Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2005 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov;111(11):1981–1992. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.022

Table 2.

Clinical Characteristics at Baseline

Unilateral Cases
Bilateral Cases
Observation (n = 123) Surgery (n = 128) Observation (n = 105) Surgery (n = 98)
Better-seeing eye [n (%)]
 Study eye 5 (4) 5 (4) 56 (53) 58 (59)
 Fellow eye 118 (96) 122 (95) 46 (44) 40 (41)
 Both eyes same visual acuity 0 1 (1) 3 (3) 0
Visual acuity* [median (quartiles)]
 Better-seeing eye 20/25 (20/40–20/20) 20/25 (20/32–20/20) 20/100 (20/200–20/64) 20/125 (20/200–20/64)
 Worse-seeing eye 20/200 (20/400–20/160) 20/200 (20/400–20/125) 20/400 (20/640–20/200) 20/320 (20/640–20/200)
Contrast threshold [median (quartiles)]
 Better-seeing eye (% contrast required) 3.2 (4.5–3.2) 3.2 (4.5–3.2) 4.5 (6.3–4.5) 6.3 (6.3–4.5)
 Worse-seeing eye (% contrast required) 8.9 (17.8–6.3) 8.9 (17.8–6.3) 12.6 (25.1–6.3) 12.6 (25.1–6.3)
Reading speed [median (quartiles)]
 Better-seeing eye (words/min) 109 (86–120) 105 (84–126) 72 (43–96) 69 (39–90)
 Worse-seeing eye (words/min) 37 (17–65) 35 (17–63) 17 (3–45) 30 (5–51)
Lens status [n (%)]
 Phakic 83 (67) 82 (64) 52 (50) 61 (62)
 Aphakic/pseudophakic 40 (33) 46 (36) 53 (50) 37 (38)
*

Snellen equivalent.

Unilateral cases, observation group: 1 patient did not have contrast threshold measured, and 2 patients did not have reading speed measured at baseline.