Table 2.
Statistical Comparison of PB Free Energy Prediction Errors between the GB Model and PBGNN on the AMBER PBSA and PBSMALL Benchmarks, Measured by MAPEa
| method | Q1 (%) | median (%) | Q3 (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBER PBSA | |||||
| GB (igb = 1) | 1.94 | 3.18 | 5.65 | 4.19 | 3.21 |
| GB (igb = 2) | 2.35 | 3.40 | 5.17 | 3.97 | 2.32 |
| GB (igb = 5) | 2.09 | 3.54 | 4.66 | 3.57 | 1.98 |
| PBGNN | 1.10 | 2.59 | 5.17 | 3.82 | 3.71 |
| PBSMALL | |||||
| GB (igb = 1) | 2.55 | 5.45 | 12.96 | 13.68 | 28.97 |
| GB (igb = 2) | 4.69 | 8.20 | 13.63 | 17.43 | 35.42 |
| GB (igb = 5) | 2.73 | 6.31 | 15.41 | 17.43 | 33.73 |
| PBGNN | 2.18 | 4.62 | 8.57 | 8.50 | 12.55 |
Reported metrics include the first quartile (Q1), median, third quartile (Q3), mean (), and standard deviation ().