ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The advancement of the digital technology has fundamentally transformed orthodontic treatment, particularly through the utilization of transparent aligner therapy and remote monitoring devices. This study assesses the efficiency, patient compliance, and clinical results of digital orthodontic monitoring compared to conventional in-office visits.
Materials and methods:
Patients receiving clear aligner treatment participated in a retrospective study comparing those monitored remotely with AI-assisted applications to those monitored using traditional methods. The analyzed primary components included treatment duration, frequency of in-person appointments, patient compliance, and overall satisfaction.
Results:
The findings indicated that while treatment efficacy remained consistent, computerized monitoring substantially decreased the number of in-office appointments.
Conclusion:
The digital monitoring group demonstrated increased patient satisfaction and compliance, highlighting the potential of remote orthodontic therapy to enhance access and treatment efficiency.
KEYWORDS: Aligner therapy, digital orthodontics, remote monitoring
INTRODUCTION
Apart from a correct diagnostic and treatment schedule, effective orthodontic treatment depends on ideal retention as the continuance of any active orthodontic phase.[1] This is so since every orthodontic treatment depends on retention in great part. Retention is achieved either by bonding fixed retainers—mostly for the lower teeth—or by using removable appliances—mostly for the upper dentition.[2] Patient compliance is the foundation of this process, and over time it tends to decrease. If removable retainers are utilized inconsistently in orthodontic therapy, relapse in that regard may follow.
By routinely evaluating patients’ degree of adherence to the use of their removable appliance, one can reduce the frequency of orthodontic relapse. This is why during the past 10 years several various remote systems have been developed.[3] Due to the introduction of digital orthodontic treatment monitoring, doctors may now remotely track the advancement of orthodontic treatment. This helps to lower the number of in-person visits and raise patient compliance. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of digital monitoring on the efficacy of treatment, patient compliance, and clinical results in the framework of clear aligner therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty individuals undergoing clear aligner treatment were enrolled within the framework of a retroactive study. Two groups were formed out of the participants, namely as follows: Group A, Digital Monitoring Group, n = 20: Frequent intraoral scans were provided and patients were under remote monitoring using AI-assisted apps. Group B, the Conventional Monitoring Group, had 20 patients assessed via frequent office visits.
Included in the study were patients between the ages of 18 and 40 undergoing complete orthodontic treatment with clear aligners who had satisfactory periodontal health and no underlying systemic disease influencing bone metabolism. Patients also must show up for scheduled follow-up visits or digital filings.
Patients with past non-compliance or orthodontic recurrence were not let to take part in the trial. Patients with significant skeletal malocclusions requiring surgical intervention were likewise excluded to take part.
The outcome measures were the length of treatment—measured in months—the number of in-office visits required for treatment adjustments, patient compliance—evaluated using an artificial intelligence-based tracking system for aligner wear time, treatment efficacy—evaluated based on final occlusion and alignment scores, and patient satisfaction—measured using a standardized questionnaire.
RESULTS
The results showed that although still receiving the same degree of treatment efficacy, patients in the digital monitoring group needed less visits to the office [Table 1]. The group that used digital monitoring had somewhat shorter therapy times, most likely because of better patient adherence and the possibility to track development in real-time. Artificial intelligence-driven reminders and automated progress tracking help to explain the considerably higher patient compliance rates in the digital group. Furthermore, the somewhat higher ratings of patient satisfaction reflect the efficiency and ease of digital monitoring.
Table 1.
Comparison between 2 groups
| Variable | Digital monitoring group (n=20) | Conventional monitoring group (n=20) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Treatment Duration (months) | 9.6±1.6 | 10.9±2.1 | <0.05 |
| Number of In-Person Visits | 2.5±1.2 | 6.7±1.9 | <0.05 |
| Patient Compliance Rate (%) | 95.5% | 82.3% | <0.05 |
| Treatment Accuracy (%) | 91.2% | 90.7% | >0.05 |
| Patient Satisfaction Score (1−10) | 9.4±0.8 | 8.0±1.2 | <0.05 |
DISCUSSION
One of the building blocks of artificial intelligence-driven remote monitoring are remote monitoring systems.[4] A study conducted recently confirmed patients’ positive attitude toward this expanding digital technology.[5] The market has made orthodontic treatments more easily available in recent years, hence improving remote monitoring and adherence. Besides, the market has made these uses more practical.
The results of this study highlight how well remote orthodontic monitoring improves therapy efficiency and reduces the need for regular office visits. Real-time tracking of aligner use made possible by AI-assisted tools helps orthodontists identify non-compliance early on and act preemptively.[6] Furthermore, digital monitoring shortens chairside time so doctors may better allocate resources and schedule visits.
Previous studies have shown similar trends that show teleorthodontics increases patient adherence and reduces therapy delays.[7] Digital orthodontic monitoring helps patients with demanding schedules or remote places to have access to orthodontic treatment. Remote monitoring does, however, have a drawback in that it depends on patient compliance to produce intraoral images and follow-through instructions.[8] Moreover, complex orthodontic treatments requiring consistent changes could still call for in-person visits.
Not with standing these challenges, digital orthodontic monitoring marks a revolution in orthodontic treatment and enables a hybrid paradigm combining online monitoring with in-person consultations as needed.[9,10] Constant developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning could help digital monitoring systems become even better by automating small changes to increase treatment results and refining therapy forecasts.
CONCLUSION
Remote aligner therapy and digital orthodontic treatment monitoring have demonstrated quite great benefits in reducing in-office visits, improving patient compliance, and maintaining treatment efficacy. This study supports the practical replacement for conventional monitoring methods—AI-assisted digital monitoring—in orthodontic therapy. Digital orthodontic treatment is expected to greatly improve access, efficiency, and patient satisfaction in orthodontic treatment given the continuous development of technology.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Feu D. Orthodontic treatment of periodontal patients: Challenges and solutions, from planning to retention. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020;25:79–116. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.6.079-116.sar. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lyros I, Tsolakis IA, Maroulakos MP, Fora E, Lykogeorgos T, Dalampira M, et al. Orthodontic retainers-A critical review. Children (Basel) 2023;10:230. doi: 10.3390/children10020230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sangalli L, Savoldi F, Dalessandri D, Visconti L, Massetti F, Bonetti S. Remote digital monitoring during the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A prospective feasibility study. Korean J Orthod. 2022;52:123–30. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dubey A, Tiwari A. Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: A literature review. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023;11:2205618. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Senbekov M, Saliev T, Bukeyeva Z, Almabayeva A, Zhanaliyeva M, Aitenova N, et al. The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in healthcare: A review. Int J Telemed Appl 2020. 2020:8830200. doi: 10.1155/2020/8830200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thurzo A, Kurilová V, Varga I. Artificial intelligence in orthodontic smart application for treatment coaching and its impact on clinical performance of patients monitored with Ai-telehealth system. Healthcare (Basel) 2021;9:1695. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Almoammar S. The role of tele-orthodontics in enhancing patient compliance and treatment monitoring. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16((Suppl 3)):S2676–8. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_368_24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Torres DK, Santos MC, Normando D. Is teledentistry effective to monitor the evolution of orthodontic treatment?A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Press J Orthod. 2023;28:e2322195. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.4.e2322195.oar. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Logan S, Riedy CA, Hargett K, Katebi N. Orthodontists'use of remote monitoring platforms pre-, amid, and post-COVID-19: A survey study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:480. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04245-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gala D, Behl H, Shah M, Makaryus AN. The role of artificial intelligence in improving patient outcomes and future of healthcare delivery in cardiology: A narrative review of the literature. Healthcare (Basel) 2024;12:481. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
