Appendix 2—table 12. Correlations between the volumes of MTL subregions and changes in between-environment pointing error from pre-test to post-test in the Navigation Pointing Error Task.

Condition	ROI	r	p	Method
Verbal Memory N=24	Ant-HIP	–0.120	0.576	Pearson
	Post-HIP	0.190	0.373	Spearman
	HIP	–0.285	0.177	Pearson
	LHIP	–0.211	0.323	Pearson
	RHIP	–0.321	0.127	Pearson
	CA1	–0.014	0.948	Pearson
	CA23DG	–0.327	0.119	Pearson
	ERC	–0.172	0.423	Pearson
	PHC	–0.183	0.391	Spearman
	PRC	0.227	0.286	Pearson
	SUB	–0.261	0.218	Pearson
Navigation N=27	Ant-HIP	–0.145	0.468	Spearman
	Post-HIP	–0.295	0.136	Pearson
	HIP	–0.125	0.534	Pearson
	LHIP	–0.169	0.400	Pearson
	RHIP	–0.084	0.676	Pearson
	CA1	–0.291	0.141	Pearson
	CA23DG	0.063	0.756	Pearson
	ERC	–0.042	0.834	Pearson
	PHC	–0.210	0.294	Pearson
	PRC	–0.011	0.955	Pearson
	SUB	–0.275	0.165	Pearson
Video N=21	Ant-HIP	–0.248	0.278	Pearson
	Post-HIP	–0.047	0.838	Pearson
	HIP	0.182	0.430	Pearson
	LHIP	0.243	0.290	Pearson
	RHIP	–0.021	0.930	Spearman
	CA1	–0.003	0.989	Pearson
	CA23DG	0.049	0.835	Pearson
	ERC	–0.183	0.425	Spearman
	PHC	0.318	0.160	Pearson
	PRC	0.044	0.850	Pearson
	SUB	0.382	0.087	Pearson