Appendix 2—table 4. Correlations between the volumes of MTL subregions and changes in learning rate from pre-test to post-test in the Verbal Memory Transfer task.

Condition	ROI	r	p	Method
Verbal Memory N = 25	Ant-HIP	0.248	0.232	Pearson
	Post-HIP	–0.043	0.837	Spearman
	CA1	0.138	0.51	Pearson
	CA23DG	0.532	0.006*	Pearson
	SUB	0.025	0.907	Pearson
	ERC	0.069	0.743	Pearson
	PRC	0.162	0.438	Pearson
	PHC	–0.068	0.748	Spearman
Navigation N = 27	Ant-HIP	–0.064	0.751	Spearman
	Post-HIP	0.183	0.362	Pearson
	CA1	0.084	0.676	Pearson
	CA23DG	–0.012	0.953	Pearson
	SUB	0.035	0.863	Pearson
	ERC	–0.142	0.48	Pearson
	PRC	0.023	0.91	Pearson
	PHC	0.223	0.264	Pearson
Video N = 21	Ant-HIP	–0.105	0.651	Pearson
	Post-HIP	0.035	0.88	Pearson
	CA1	–0.131	0.572	Pearson
	CA23DG	–0.083	0.719	Pearson
	SUB	–0.24	0.294	Pearson
	ERC	0.149	0.52	Spearman
	PRC	0.121	0.6	Pearson
	PHC	–0.292	0.198	Pearson

^*Significant results after FDR correction. Ant: anterior; Post: posterior.