Appendix 2—table 5. Correlations between the volumes of MTL subregions and changes in learning rate from pre-test to post-test in the Navigation Transfer task.

Condition	ROI	r	p	Method
Verbal Memory N = 26	Ant-HIP	–0.328	0.102	Pearson
	Post-HIP	–0.147	0.471	Spearman
	HIP	–0.314	0.119	Pearson
	LHIP	–0.291	0.149	Pearson
	RHIP	–0.305	0.129	Pearson
	CA1	–0.181	0.377	Pearson
	CA23DG	–0.261	0.198	Pearson
	SUB	–0.257	0.205	Pearson
	ERC	0.027	0.897	Pearson
	PRC	–0.018	0.931	Pearson
	PHC	–0.243	0.23	Spearman
Navigation N = 27	Ant-HIP	–0.482	0.012	Spearman
	Post-HIP	–0.042	0.837	Pearson
	HIP	–0.266	0.181	Pearson
	LHIP	–0.247	0.214	Pearson
	RHIP	–0.274	0.167	Pearson
	CA1	–0.246	0.215	Pearson
	CA23DG	–0.334	0.088	Pearson
	SUB	0.087	0.665	Pearson
	ERC	0.008	0.967	Pearson
	PRC	–0.021	0.917	Pearson
	PHC	0.028	0.891	Pearson
Video N = 19	Ant-HIP	–0.101	0.681	Pearson
	Post-HIP	0.048	0.846	Pearson
	HIP	0.124	0.612	Pearson
	LHIP	0.246	0.31	Pearson
	RHIP	0.028	0.911	Spearman
	CA1	0.02	0.934	Pearson
	CA23DG	0.128	0.6	Pearson
	SUB	0.053	0.828	Pearson
	ERC	0.194	0.425	Pearson
	PRC	0.24	0.322	Pearson
	PHC	–0.089	0.716	Pearson

Ant: anterior; Post: posterior.