Appendix 2—table 8. Correlations between the volumes of MTL subregions and changes in slope from pre-test to post-test in the Verbal Memory Transfer task.

Condition	ROI	r	p	Method
Verbal Memory N = 26	Ant-HIP	0.30	0.15	Pearson
	Post-HIP	–0.14	0.51	Spearman
	HIP	0.39	0.05	Pearson
	LHIP	0.32	0.12	Pearson
	RHIP	0.42	0.04	Pearson
	CA1	0.13	0.54	Pearson
	CA23DG	0.50	0.01	Pearson
	SUB	0.15	0.46	Pearson
	ERC	0.11	0.59	Pearson
	PRC	0.19	0.37	Pearson
	PHC	0.01	0.95	Spearman
Navigation N = 27	Ant-HIP	0.04	0.83	Spearman
	Post-HIP	0.23	0.26	Pearson
	HIP	0.09	0.67	Pearson
	LHIP	0.10	0.63	Pearson
	RHIP	0.07	0.71	Pearson
	CA1	0.18	0.36	Pearson
	CA23DG	0.02	0.92	Pearson
	SUB	0.06	0.75	Pearson
	ERC	–0.10	0.63	Pearson
	PRC	0.01	0.97	Pearson
	PHC	0.21	0.30	Pearson
Video N = 21	Ant-HIP	–0.23	0.32	Pearson
	Post-HIP	–0.05	0.82	Pearson
	HIP	–0.29	0.20	Pearson
	LHIP	–0.28	0.21	Pearson
	RHIP	–0.28	0.21	Spearman
	CA1	–0.16	0.50	Pearson
	CA23DG	–0.15	0.51	Pearson
	SUB	–0.31	0.17	Pearson
	ERC	0.09	0.71	Spearman
	PRC	0.05	0.82	Pearson
	PHC	–0.33	0.14	Pearson

Ant: anterior; Post: posterior.