Skip to main content
. 2001 Oct 15;20(20):5626–5635. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.20.5626

graphic file with name cde561f5a.jpg

graphic file with name cde561f5b.jpg

Fig. 5. The TOM complex is sufficient for membrane translocation of apocytochrome c. (A) Liposomes with or without reconstituted TOM complex and enclosed IgG were incubated with radiolabelled apocytochrome c; import was performed and analysed as described in Figure 2. (B) Purified OMV (15 µg/sample) with and without enclosed anti-apocytochrome c IgG were incubated with radiolabelled apocytochrome c and an import reaction was performed. Half the samples were lysed with Triton X-100 and import was analysed as in Figure 2. (C) Crosslinking of apocytochrome c with the TOM complex. Isolated TOM complex (6 µg) was incubated with or without apocytochrome c (10 µg) in the presence or absence of 0.25 mM DSS for 30 min on ice. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 5 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.0. The proteins were precipitated with TCA, separated by SDS–PAGE, blotted on to nitrocellulose and immunostained with anti-Tom40 antiserum. The crosslinking products are indicated (see Rapaport et al., 1998a). The asterisk indicates the crosslinking adduct between apocytochrome c and Tom40. The apparent molecular mass of this crosslinked product (∼52 kDa) fits well to an adduct between these two proteins. We tried to confirm the identity of apocytochrome c by immunostaining. However, the presence of a cross-reacting band (possibly a tetramer of apocytochrome c) in this molecular mass region (even in the absence of TOM complex) made this analysis impossible (data not shown).