Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 25;151(3):205–218. doi: 10.1007/s10633-025-10049-8

Table 2.

Correlation analysis between percentage changes in ERG responses and RBF in the FLS and SLS groups

ERG measures (%Δ) %Δ ABF %Δ VBF
FLS group SLS group FLS group SLS group
r-value p-value r-value p-value r-value p-value r-value p-value
%Δ a-wave amplitude  −0.342 0.333 0.072 0.853 0.257 0.474 0.022 0.955
%Δ a-wave implicit time  −0.142 0.695 0.402 0.284 0.175 0.628 0.539 0.135
%Δ b-wave amplitude 0.655 0.040  −0.042 0.914 0.638 0.047  −0.132 0.735
%Δ b-wave implicit time 0.338 0.339 0.476 0.195 0.223 0.536 0.334 0.380
%Δ PhNR amplitude  −0.334 0.346 0.259 0.501  −0.496 0.145 0.312 0.414
%Δ PhNR implicit time  −0.08 0.827 -0.039 0.921  −0.423 0.224  −0.154 0.693
%Δ ΣOPs amplitude  −0.121 0.739 0.196 0.613 0.072 0.844 0.297 0.440