Table 4.
Summary of the themes related to each research question.
| Research Question | Theme | Description | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| RQ1: Current trends in cyberbullying detection for Arabic language and dialects | ML and DL Approaches | ML models (e.g., SVM, Naïve Bayes) and DL models (e.g., CNN, BERT) are common for cyberbullying detection, with ensemble methods improving accuracy. | Haidar et al. (2017); Alakrot et al. (2018); Alrashidi et al. (2023) |
| Sentiment Analysis and Lexicon-Based Methods | Sentiment analysis and lexicon-based approaches capture emotional tones and harmful language, essential for handling Arabic’s diverse dialects. | AlHarbi et al. (2019); Farid and El-Tazi (2020) | |
| Handling Arabic Dialects and Complexity | Specialized datasets and models (e.g., AraBERT, multilingual BERT) address dialectal variability, enhancing model accuracy for Arabic. | Mubarak and Darwish (2019); AbdelHamid et al. (2022); Khezzar et al. (2023) | |
| RQ2: Standards used for detecting cyberbullying based on its characteristics | Development of Cyberbullying Datasets | Creation of Arabic-specific datasets that include dialectical variations and cyberbullying characteristics, though issues like imbalanced datasets (few cyberbullying instances) impact model performance. | Bashir and Bouguessa (2021); Khairy et al. (2023); AbdelHamid et al. (2022) |
| Evaluation Standards and Metrics | Precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy are commonly used metrics, supplemented by specialized metrics tailored to Arabic-language characteristics to ensure reliable detection performance. | Haidar et al. (2017); Alakrot et al. (2021); Boulouard et al. (2022) | |
| Linguistic and Psychological Standards | Integration of linguistic and psychological insights, such as personality inference, allows a deeper understanding of user behavior, helping to identify cyberbullying based on more human-centered behavioral traits. | Elzayady et al. (2023); Omar et al. (2021); Shannaq et al. (2022) | |
| Contextual and Cultural Considerations | Incorporation of cultural sensitivity, including the use of dialect-specific language features, emojis, and contextual sentiment, provides a more nuanced and culturally accurate detection of offensive language. | AlHarbi et al. (2019); Farid and El-Tazi (2020); Khezzar et al. (2023) | |
| RQ3: Future research directions for Arabic cyberbullying detection | Dialect-Specific Datasets and Multilingual Models | Expansion of dialect-specific datasets and multilingual models to enhance detection across Arabic dialects and improve cross-linguistic applicability. | Ali and Kurdy (2022); Rachidi et al. (2023); Shannaq et al. (2022) |
| Advanced Feature Engineering and Hybrid Models | Development of hybrid models (e.g., CNN-LSTM-BERT) and advanced feature engineering, such as attention mechanisms and personality-based features, for richer context and improved detection accuracy. | Mouheb et al. (2019); Elzayady et al. (2023); Boulouard et al. (2022) | |
| Real-Time Detection and Privacy Considerations | Focus on real-time cyberbullying detection models for immediate response, with privacy-preserving techniques to ensure user data protection and ethical AI application. | Amer Hamzah and Dhannoon (2023); Omar et al. (2021); Kanan et al. (2021) | |
| Cross-Disciplinary Research | Integration of psychological, sociological, and linguistic insights for a more comprehensive understanding of the social and behavioral dynamics underlying Arabic cyberbullying. | Farid and El-Tazi (2020); Omar et al. (2021); Elzayady et al. (2023) |