Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 29;151(12):307. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06358-9

Table 2.

Clinical factors associated with PFS and OS in MCL patients on COX analysis

Variable Groups Univariate COX analysis Multivariate COX analysis
OS HR (95% CI P value) PFS HR (95% CI P value) OS HR (95% CI P value) PFS HR (95% CI P value)
Age  > 60 vs. ≤  60 0.50 (0.16–1.55, p = 0.230) 0.70 (0.28–1.71, p = 0.429)
Ann Arbor I/II vs. III/IV 4.11 (1.27–13.30, p = 0.018) 3.10 (1.18–8.13, p = 0.022)
LDH Normal vs. abnormal 3.60 (1.33–9.76, p = 0.012) 4.97 (2.00–12.37, p < 0.001) 2.98 (1.03–8.64, p = 0.044) 5.00 (1.79–13.96, p = 0.002)
Extranodal sites  < 2 vs. ≥ 2 2.28 (0.85–6.12, p = 0.101) 3.14 (1.34–7.35, p = 0.008)
ECOG 0–1 vs. ≥ 2 4.17 (0.90–19.26, p = 0.068) 4.65 (1.32–16.38, p = 0.017)
B symptom Without vs. with 6.52 (2.42–17.58, p < 0.001) 4.47 (1.91–10.48, p < 0.001) 5.80 (2.08–16.21, p = 0.001) 4.38 (1.67–11.46, p = 0.003)
Laterality Unilateral vs. bilateral 2.44 (0.78–7.56, p = 0.124) 3.26 (1.27–8.39, p = 0.014) 7.55 (2.56–22.32, p < 0.001)

Abbreviations: ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase