Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 24;26(6):272–281. doi: 10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-3-5

Table 2. Comparison of laboratory and functional parameters between nintedanib and pirfenidone treatment groups in IPF patients.

Parameter

Nintedanib (n = 41)

Pirfenidone (n = 52)

P

Arterial blood gas measurements

-

-

-

- pH

7.41±0.04

7.42±0.04

0.361

- pO2 (mmHg)

71.65±5.85

75.47±6.15

0.734

- pCO2 (mmHg)

34.85±3.94

36.13±3.92

0.391

Pulmonary function tests

-

-

-

- FVC (%)

77.37±18.68

72.00±17.67

0.160

- FEV1 (%)

82.63±19.46

77.15±16.93

0.150

- FEV1/FVC (%)

86.02±7.98

83.54±11.84

0.219

- DLCO (%)

55.21±16.64

54.06±16.70

0.493

6 minute walk test, (m)

359.89±42.23

347.91±41.47

0.565

6 minute walk test, %

65.92±14.60

65.08±15.20

0.805

GAP score

3.39±1.61

4.21±1.14

0.007

IPF: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, PFT: Pulmonary function tests, FVC: Forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC: Ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity, DLCO: Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, m: Meter, GAP: Gender, Age, Physiology Score