Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep;25(3):136–144. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v25i3.18

Table 3.

Comparison between study populations based on Elabela-21 and Elabela-11 according to sex

Parameters Groups Male
(Mean ± SE)
Female
(Mean ± SE)
P-Value C.S.
Elabela-21 (pg/mL) Control (n=60) 543.68 ± 5.07 541.72 ± 5.18 0.7876 P>0.05 (NS)
Prediabetes (n=60) 638.12 ± 3.76 644.36 ± 5.23 0.337 P>0.05 (NS)
T2DM (n=60) 797.19 ± 14.05 809.22 ± 18.58 0.6044 P>0.05 (NS)
Elabela-11 (pg/mL) Control (n=60) 139.65 ± 5.16 142.01 ± 5.11 0.7464 P>0.05 (NS)
Prediabetes (n=60) 335.88 ± 4.30 342.62 ± 5.40 0.334 P>0.05 (NS)
T2DM (n=60) 494.48 ± 13.51 510.86 ± 19.07 0.4817 P>0.05 (NS)