Table 2.
Studies evaluating circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease
|
Ref.
|
Title
|
Clinical relevance
|
| Alcaide et al[73], 2020 | Evaluating the quantity, quality and size distribution of cell-free DNA by multiplex droplet digital PCR | Presents a novel droplet digital PCR assay to identify suboptimal samples and aberrant cfDNA size distributions, the latter typically associated with high ctDNA levels |
| King et al[76], 2023 | Prospectivelongitudinal tumor-informed ctDNA in resectable biliary tract cancers | Assesses the utility of ctDNA levels in evaluating response in the absence of radiographically visible disease. ctDNA showed a higher detection rate than CA 19-9 prior to resection |
| Park et al[77], 2024 | Ultrashort cell-free DNA fragments and vimentin-positive circulating tumor cells for predicting early recurrence in patients with biliary tract cancer | Investigates the effectiveness of cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells in predicting early recurrence after curative surgery and adjuvant therapy in patients with BTC |
| Yoo et al[78], 2024 | Circulating tumor DNA status and dynamics predict recurrence in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | Evaluates superiority of ctDNA over conventional biomarkers in predicting recurrence and informing adjuvant chemotherapy in resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
| Yu et al[79], 2025 | Detecting early recurrence with circulating tumor DNA in stage I-III biliary tract cancer after curative resection | Evaluates serial ctDNA testing for surveillance after curative resection in early-stage BTC. Identified recurrence in 93.8% of cases, with a median lead time of 3.7 months |
BTC: Biliary tract cancer; cfDNA: Cell free DNA; ctDNA: Circulating tumor DNA.