Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 30;79(11):1144–1148. doi: 10.1038/s41430-025-01643-9

Table 3.

Differences between indirect calorimetry variables with versus without CVVHD based on the scenario of indirect calorimetry runs.

Variable Scenario 1 (N = 32)* Scenario 2 (N = 45)a P
Delta REE
 kJ/d 36 [−759–450] −95 [−517–565] 0.69
 (kcal/d) (8.5 [−181–107]) (−23 [−124–135])
Delta RQ −0.02 [−0.04–0.01] 0.00 [−0.03–0.03] 0.14
Delta VO2 (ml/min) 1.7 [−26.5–15.3] 3.2 [−18.8–19.7] 0.71
Delta VCO2 (ml/min) −4.8 [−20.0–17.8] 4.5 [−13.2–12.5] 0.39

REE resting energy expenditure, RQ respiratory quotient, VO2 oxygen consumption, VCO2 CO2 production.

aScenario 1: Indirect calorimetry first with and then without CVVHD; scenario 2: indirect calorimetry first without and then with CVVHD.