Table 3.
Differences between indirect calorimetry variables with versus without CVVHD based on the scenario of indirect calorimetry runs.
| Variable | Scenario 1 (N = 32)* | Scenario 2 (N = 45)a | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delta REE | |||
| kJ/d | 36 [−759–450] | −95 [−517–565] | 0.69 |
| (kcal/d) | (8.5 [−181–107]) | (−23 [−124–135]) | |
| Delta RQ | −0.02 [−0.04–0.01] | 0.00 [−0.03–0.03] | 0.14 |
| Delta VO2 (ml/min) | 1.7 [−26.5–15.3] | 3.2 [−18.8–19.7] | 0.71 |
| Delta VCO2 (ml/min) | −4.8 [−20.0–17.8] | 4.5 [−13.2–12.5] | 0.39 |
REE resting energy expenditure, RQ respiratory quotient, VO2 oxygen consumption, VCO2 CO2 production.
aScenario 1: Indirect calorimetry first with and then without CVVHD; scenario 2: indirect calorimetry first without and then with CVVHD.