ABSTRACT
Diagnostic delays prevent most Chagas disease patients from receiving timely therapy during the acute phase when treatment is effective. Quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based diagnostic methods provide high sensitivity during this phase but require specialized equipment and complex protocols. More simple and cost-effective tools are urgently needed to expand early Chagas disease diagnosis in low-income endemic regions. Here, we present a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) that targets a highly conserved region in the HSP70 gene of Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease. This assay demonstrates species-specific amplification across multiple parasite genetic lineages while maintaining stability after 1 hour of incubation and at least 8 months of storage at −20°C. Moreover, the assay is at least 12 times less expensive than the TaqMan qPCR that is currently routinely used for acute Chagas diagnostics and is compatible with a low-cost CTAB-based DNA extraction method. Population-based validation in 100 infants born to Chagas-positive mothers in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, yielded a specificity of 100% and sensitivity exceeding 77% when compared to a TaqMan qPCR that targets satellite DNA. This cost-effective DNA extraction method and LAMP assay demonstrate potential for diagnosing Chagas disease in resource-limited endemic regions, particularly where qPCR is unavailable.
IMPORTANCE
Chagas disease, caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is a life-threatening illness that disproportionately affects resource-limited communities. Congenital Chagas disease, if diagnosed early, presents a unique opportunity for intervention, as treatment in newborns is highly effective with minimal side effects. However, early diagnosis is hindered by the high cost and limited availability of current molecular diagnostic methods in endemic regions. Our study introduces a simple, low-cost, and highly specific LAMP assay targeting the HSP70 gene of T. cruzi. This assay is user-friendly, stable under varying storage and incubation conditions, and designed for accessibility in underserved areas. By providing a detailed, open-access protocol and primers, we aim to facilitate the widespread adoption of this diagnostic assay, enabling earlier detection and treatment. This assay lays the groundwork for a new approach to Chagas disease management, potentially reducing the spread of Chagas disease and improving public health outcomes in vulnerable populations globally.
KEYWORDS: molecular diagnosis, LAMP-PCR, cost-effective method, HSP70 gene, acute chagas, congenital transmission
INTRODUCTION
Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease, is endemic to the Americas, primarily affecting vulnerable populations and perpetuating poverty (1). Annually, about 30,000 new cases are reported, with ~6 million people estimated to be infected (2). This devastating disease can cause severe clinical manifestations, including megaesophagus, megacolon, and dilated cardiomyopathy, leading to an estimated 12,000 deaths per year (2).
Chagas disease is transmitted through various routes, including vectorial (via triatomine bugs), oral, congenital, blood transfusion, organ transplantation, and lab accidents (3). Despite successful vector control and blood screening, congenital transmission remains a key source of new T. cruzi infections, accounting for approximately 22% of cases and serving as the primary source of new infections in non-endemic regions (4, 5). Once infected, patients enter an acute phase characterized by high parasitemia (6). During this phase, available treatments (benznidazole or nifurtimox) are highly effective and are well-tolerated in infants but can cause mild to severe side effects in adults (7, 8). The acute phase, especially in the context of congenital infection, offers a crucial window for intervention to prevent severe disease progression (7). Unfortunately, the absence of symptoms or the presence of non-specific ones often delays diagnosis. Consequently, it is estimated that fewer than 1% of people with Chagas disease receive treatment, largely due to delayed detection (9, 10).
Serological tests are routinely used to diagnose Chagas disease in the chronic phase, which is characterized by very low parasitemia (11). These tests, however, which rely on the presence of anti-T. cruzi antibodies, cannot reliably detect acute infections, including congenital infections, where anti-parasite antibody levels are typically low. Therefore, molecular diagnosis represents an ideal strategy for acute phase infection when parasitemia is high and infection is treatable (12–16). The most common molecular diagnostics for acute phase infection are quantitative PCRs (qPCRs) targeting nuclear satellite DNA (SatDNA) (13, 17, 18), but these are expensive and require sophisticated equipment that is often unavailable in the low- and middle-income regions affected by Chagas disease (19, 20). This highlights the urgent need for cost-effective, robust, and simple DNA-based diagnostic assays. Without such tools, the timely diagnosis of congenital Chagas and other acute forms of the disease will remain challenging, leaving infections untreated and increasing the risk of irreversible chronic Chagas complications (21, 22).
To help address the limitations of existing molecular diagnostics, two major isothermal DNA amplification technologies have emerged as alternatives to standard qPCR: loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), introduced in 2000 (23), and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), introduced in 2006 (24). Though it utilizes a more complex primer design, LAMP is notably less expensive than RPA (25) and has been widely used in diagnosing other infectious diseases such as COVID-19 and malaria, demonstrating its potential as a tool for population level diagnosis (26–28). Additionally, compared to qPCR, LAMP requires less hardware and is more tolerant of amplification inhibitors (29).
Although LAMP assays have been developed for Chagas diagnosis previously (30–33), existing assays have shown some limitations, including false positives (30), inability to discriminate between infection with T. cruzi and infection with other trypanosomatids (31, 34), and restricted access to protocols (30, 32). Additionally, there is some evidence that the extreme genetic variability of T. cruzi strains might affect LAMP assay performance (35). The limitations of existing LAMP assays highlight the need for alternative targets.
A promising alternative is to target the conserved protein-coding genes of T. cruzi, which have yet to be explored in LAMP assays for Chagas disease. Protein-coding genes are particularly appealing because of their greater genetic stability, a critical factor for reliable primer alignment (36). While often overlooked in diagnostics due to their low copy numbers, protein-coding genes in T. cruzi often exist as multigene families, affording both the high copy numbers required for test sensitivity as well as the sequence conservation needed to develop a sufficiently specific diagnostic.
In this study, we developed a novel LAMP assay targeting a highly conserved region in the multicopy, protein-coding HSP70 gene family of T. cruzi. Our LAMP protocol successfully amplified T. cruzi DNA from five distinct parasite genetic lineages without amplifying DNA from the related parasites Trypanosoma rangeli and Leishmania spp. The assay proved robust and stable under various conditions, including a variety of incubation times, medium-term storage at +4°C, and long-term storage at −20°C. It also produced consistent results across various sample types. Evaluating congenital Chagas in a population of Santa Cruz, Bolivia, the assay showed optimal specificity and high sensitivity. This portable method could enable large-scale diagnosis and patient monitoring in endemic regions lacking economic or infrastructural resources.
RESULTS
The T. cruzi HSP70 subfamily genes, which serve as molecular chaperones involved in protein folding and transport, are an appealing target for a LAMP assay. In T. cruzi, there are an average of 88 HSP70 genes per genome (TriTryp DB, Release 68). Moreover, the gene appears to be highly species-specific, in terms of both organization and sequence, potentially allowing for the specific discrimination of T. cruzi from other trypanosomatid parasites (37, 38). To assess the potential of T. cruzi HSP70 as a diagnostic target, we performed a neighbor-joining tree analysis to compare the HSP70 sequences across various T. cruzi strains (n = 36) and two closely related trypanosomatids, Leishmania spp. (n = 11), and T. rangeli (n = 4), which infect humans in the same geographic region as T. cruzi. The T. cruzi HSP70 sequences cluster in a distinct clade compared to the HSP70 of T. rangeli and Leishmania spp. (Fig. 1; File S1). The T. cruzi HSP70 sequences exhibited a high identity of 98.63% (File S1), indicating that this sequence is highly conserved and serves as a feasible target for designing LAMP primers.
Fig 1.
The HSP70 sequence is a molecular marker that differentiates T. cruzi from closely related trypanosomatids. Neighbor-joining tree analysis based on HSP70 sequences discriminates Leishmania spp. (blue), T. rageli (purple), and T. cruzi (green). The horizontal scale represents the evolutionary distance. A scale of 0.03 means an average of three substitutions per 100 nucleotides.
Next, the LAMPTcHSP70 primers were designed along a region of 236 bp at the end of the HSP70 open reading frame. This region was conserved across T. cruzi strains but included sequence variations in Leishmania spp. and T. rangeli to minimize primer binding to these other species. Eight subregions were defined (F3, F2, FLc, F1, B1c, BL, B2c, and B3c), resulting in six primers, the forward outer primer (F3), the backward outer primer (B3), the forward loop primer (FL), the backward loop primer (BL), the forward inner primer (FIP), and the backward inner primer (BIP). The FIP and BIP primers create the forward and backward loop, respectively, and align in two regions each. FIP aligns in F2 and F1c, while BIP aligns in B2c and B1c (Fig. 2; File S2 and S3). The designed primers showed Gibbs free energy (ΔG) values between −3.61 and −11.49, with primers F3 and F1c showing moderate risk for self and heterodimers (File S4).
Fig 2.
Primers for LAMPTcHSP70 align to regions that distinguish T. cruzi from Leishmania and T. rangeli. The HSP70 sequences from 12 representative strains of Leishmania, T. rangeli, and T. cruzi were aligned using the Clustal Omega algorithm. The regions where the primers align in forward and reverse are shown as purple and orange bars, respectively. The inner primers (FIP and BIP) align to two distinct regions, connected by red lines. Nucleotide variants are depicted as small colored bars over the sequences represented as horizontal gray bars. All T. cruzi sequences, except T. cruzi marinkellei, which does not infect humans, show 100% identity in the primer-targeted regions. The figure was generated using Geneious Prime software. Sequences named on the left: (1) L. braziliensis, (2) T. rangeli, (3) T. cruzi marinkellei, (4) T. cruzi Dm28c, (5) T. cruzi G, (6) T. cruzi Sylvio, (7) T. cruzi YC6, (8) T. cruzi Berenice, (9) T. cruzi Brasil A4, (10) T. cruzi TCC, (11) T. cruzi Tulahuen, and (12) T. cruzi CL.
To test the LAMPTcHSP70 primers, we conducted a preliminary reaction evaluating the amplification under the conditions established by Ordoñez et al.(33). This involved incubating for 60 minutes at 65°C and adapting it to the SYBR Green-based one-pot system (39) (Fig. 3A). We evaluated two representative T. cruzi strains (Sylvio and G) and two negative controls (no template control and human DNA control). A positive result was visible as a color change from orange to green under visible light or as green fluorescence under UV light (Fig. 3B). The results were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis, which showed amplification bands for both T. cruzi strains and no bands for the negative controls. Additionally, the agarose gel did not show significant formation of primer dimers (Fig. 3C).
Fig 3.
LAMPTcHSP70 amplifies T. cruzi DNA. (A) Workflow for LAMPTcHSP70 amplification. (B) Visualization of the amplified products by visible light and UV light. 1 ng DNA was loaded per sample. (C) Visualization of the amplified products by electrophoresis. Representative agarose gel of three replicates showing the classic pattern of LAMP product. Three microliters of the amplified products was visualized on a 2% agarose gel pre-stained with 0.2 µg/mL ethidium bromide. A 100 bp DNA ladder was used as a reference for determining Amplicon sizes. Created in BioRender (2025). https://BioRender.com/8h9gegb.
Next, we evaluated the specificity of the LAMPTcHSP70 assay for T. cruzi and its ability to amplify various distinct strains. We tested 40 samples, including two negative controls, two Leishmania species, T. brucei, T. rangeli, and 34 T. cruzi strains. The LAMPTcHSP70 did not amplify DNA from any species other than T. cruzi. The LAMPTcHSP70 showed a preliminary sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85% to 100%), and a specificity of 100% (95% CI:40% to 100%). Only the isolate T. cruzi Mg TcI from Colombia did not show positive amplification (Fig. 4). These results may be influenced by several factors, including sample integrity, the presence of inhibitors, and potential genomic sequence variation.
Fig 4.
LAMPTcHSP70 shows high specificity and sensitivity using parasite-derived DNA. Forty samples were run in parallel. representative captures of two replicates evaluated by visible and UV light. For all samples, 1 ng of purified DNA was seeded.
After confirming that the LAMPTcHSP70 has good specificity and promising sensitivity, we assessed the analytical limit of detection (LoD). To achieve this, we serially diluted T. cruzi DNA to identify the lowest DNA amount yielding a positive amplification. We evaluated seven reference strains representing the five different T. cruzi lineages known as discrete typing units (DTUs). DTUs broadly represent the parasite’s genomic variability. Initial 10-fold serial dilutions established a preliminary LoD of 0.01 ng (Fig. 5A and B). To refine this estimate, we conducted further twofold dilutions for two representative strains, resulting in a final LoD of 1.25 pg. The LoD was consistent across different T. cruzi lineages and is equivalent to 0.068 ± 0.032 parasites (Fig. 5C and D; File S5). When comparing the LAMPTcHSP70 to the routine TaqMan SatDNA qPCR used for acute Chagas diagnosis (40), the LAMPTcHSP70 was able to detect DNA in samples with a SatDNA qPCR Ct value up to 28.37 ± 0.26 (File S6). These results suggest that LAMPTcHSP70 might have optimal sensitivity for detecting acute Chagas infections characterized by high parasitemia.
Fig 5.
The LAMPTcHSP70 assay shows a consistent LoD across multiple strains and DTUs, with a LoD in the order of picograms. (A) LoD after the first round of serial DNA dilutions using a factor of 10. (B) LoD after the first round of serial DNA dilutions using a factor of 2. (C) Design of CRISPR-Cas12a system. (D) LoD after using LAMPTcHSP70 coupled to CRIPRcas12a system. Three independent replicates per strain. Mean fluorescence intensity was estimated using the ROI manager tool of fiji two software. (A and B) Error bars indicate standard error. The horizontal red line highlights the mean fluorescence intensity reached by the negative control.
We next evaluated whether the addition of CRISPR-Cas12a to the LAMPTcHSP70 could improve the LoD as demonstrated in previous studies targeting different pathogens (39, 41–44). We designed a gRNA to specifically recognize a sequence between the B1 and F1c regions, where the inner primers align to form the loops (Fig. 5C). As shown in Fig. 5D, although the CRISPR-Cas12a system improved the discrimination between positive and negative amplification, it did not significantly extend the LoD. Our cost analysis revealed that the standard TaqMan SatDNA PCR is 14.3 times more expensive than LAMP with SYBR Green and 12.9 times more expensive than LAMP with the Cas12a system, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of the LAMP approach (File S7).
Once the LoD for our system was established, we then assessed the minimum incubation time required for optimal amplification of 2 pg of DNA of the template. Our findings demonstrate that incubation at 65°C for 60 minutes is needed to detect low-abundance targets (Fig. 6A; File S9). Although our preliminary analysis did not reveal nonspecific amplification after 120 minutes of incubation (Fig. 6A; File S9), we further evaluated this by including a set of 24 reactions using only human DNA. These reactions revealed nonspecific products at 2 hours, but stable results were still observed at 60 minutes (Fig. S1). When storing the complete master mix at 4°C, we found it remained stable for up to 4 weeks, with a significant decline in signal intensity observed after 5 weeks, indicating a loss of performance (Fig. S2). We then evaluated the long-term stability of the complete master mix at −20°C. After 8 months, the master mix showed no significant difference in mean fluorescence intensity (Fig. 6B; File S8). These results indicate that LAMPTcHSP70 is stable for prolonged incubation and storage at −20°C. The reaction can thus be prepared in large batches to streamline daily sample processing.
Fig 6.
The LAMP targeting T. cruzi HSP70 remains stable even after extended incubation and storage times. (A) Extended incubation times do not reveal non-specific amplification in negative controls. Data represent four technical replicates per incubation period. Human DNA (negative control) was seeded at 50 ng, while T. cruzi DNA was seeded at 2 pg. (B) Master mix storing for 8 months does not affect LAMP performance. Data represent three technical replicates per storing period. One reaction was used for negative control. Human DNA (negative control) was seeded at 50 ng, while T. cruzi DNA was seeded at 1 ng. Error bars indicate standard error. Mean fluorescence intensity was estimated by ROI area using Fiji software.
Having demonstrated good specificity, sensitivity, and stability of our LAMPTcHSP70 assay with parasite isolates, we then evaluated its performance with clinical samples. A total of 100 infants born to Chagas-positive mothers were analyzed; for each infant, DNA was extracted from peripheral and/or umbilical cord blood. Ninety-two infants had a single sample tested, while eight infants (infant IDs: 1, 2, 15, 19, 27, 31, 34, and 76) had more than one sample evaluated, resulting in a total of 109 samples (File S9). We compared both the sample-based and patient-based performance of LAMPTcHSP70 with the TaqMan-based SatDNA-qPCR, the routine diagnostic test for congenital Chagas disease, using a blinded approach. For the 109 samples evaluated, LAMP demonstrated a sensitivity of 77.27% (95% CI: 54.63% to 92.18%) identifying 17 out of 22 positive samples by qPCR, a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 95.85% to 100.00%), an accuracy of 98.86% (94.63% to 99.95%), and a Kappa agreement of 84% (95% CI: 71.12% to 97.76%) (Fig. 7A). When analyzing results per patient, where at least one positive sample classified the infant as positive, LAMP showed a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI: 61.65% to 98.45%) identifying 14 out of 16 positives by qPCR, a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 95.7% to 100.00%), an accuracy of 99.37% (95% CI: 95.2% to 100%), and a Kappa agreement of 92% (95% CI: 81.41% to 100%)(Fig. 7B). Notably, LAMPTcHSP70 performed better with samples with high parasitemia but also detected samples with low parasitemia, as shown in Fig. 7C. These findings suggest that LAMPTcHSP70 is a viable alternative to SatDNA-qPCR for diagnosing acute Chagas, especially in resource-limited settings.
Fig 7.
The LAMPTcHsp70 assay exhibits high specificity and accuracy but lower sensitivity compared to SatDNA-qPCR. (A) Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy per test. (B) Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy per patient diagnosis. (C) Positive and negative LAMPTcHSP70 results in relation to parasitic load (parasites/mL) as estimated by the qPCR calibration curve. (D) Alignment of HSP70 sequences from clinical isolates.
Besides sensitivity and variability in sample quality, the failure of LAMP to amplify certain samples may also stem from issues with primer alignment. HSP70 is a highly conserved gene, but T. cruzi parasites exhibit significant genomic plasticity (45). The inability of our LAMP to amplify certain samples detected by standard PCR (e.g., infant IDs: 4, 19) might also be the result of genomic variations, such as mutations or low gene dose, that affect LAMP performance. Additional DNA from the patients tested was unavailable to investigate HSP70 sequence variations potentially impacting primer alignment, so we analyzed the HSP70 sequence of 15 clinical T. cruzi isolates from additional patients from the same population in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. The analysis confirmed that the HSP70 sequence is generally highly conserved, revealing only one variant (p1575 T - > G). This variant does not affect the 3′ or 5′ primer ends, suggesting a likely low impact on primer performance (Fig. 7D). However, these findings underscore that local parasite populations may harbor low-frequency variants that could impact primer alignment for the LAMP and other assays.
Finally, to enable LAMP-PCR implementation in low-resource settings, we evaluated the compatibility of a cost-effective DNA extraction method with the LAMP-PCR assay. DNA extracted using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) buffer-based protocol was compared to the reference commercial kit (Roche High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit). The CTAB-based method takes about 50 minutes to complete, and non-significant differences were observed in DNA yield or LAMP-PCR performance between the two methods (Fig. S3). After a cost analysis, the CTAB-based method was at least four times cheaper than the previously mentioned commercial kit (File S7). These results indicate that the CTAB-based DNA extraction method can be considered as a viable alternative for DNA extraction in LAMP-PCR protocols targeting blood-borne pathogens such as T. cruzi.
DISCUSSION
Early diagnosis is critical for the treatment of Chagas disease, but is hampered by the high cost of traditional methods. Here, we present a new specific, stable, and accessible LAMP assay based on the detection of T. cruzi HSP70 gene.
LAMP has emerged as a cost-effective method for expanding the use of molecular diagnostics at the population level (25), yet only a few assays exist for detecting T. cruzi. Primarily focused on established qPCR targets, these assays show variable sensitivity (69.2%–97%) (30–32) and frequently suffer from non-specific amplification, resulting in false positives (30) or an inability to distinguish T. cruzi infection from infection with related trypanosomatids (31, 34), leading to a reduced specificity. Moreover, the primer sequences for one of the most promising SatDNA-targeting LAMP have not been made publicly available, limiting its use and independent validation (30, 32, 46). Given these limitations, we sought to develop an open-access LAMP assay targeting a novel, highly specific T. cruzi sequence.
Our phylogenetic analysis confirmed the effectiveness of HSP70 in distinguishing T. cruzi from related species, enabling the design of LAMP primers targeting eight highly conserved regions. Using this primer set, we found that our LAMPTcHSP70 assay demonstrated 100% specificity when tested with reference strains and clinical samples, with no false positives even after 1 hour of incubation time. This indicates a lack of non-specific primer interactions, a common issue in LAMP assays exceeding 30 minutes of incubation (47, 48). Furthermore, unlike 18S rRNA targeting assays, our HSP70-based assay avoids cross-amplification with Leishmania, further highlighting its high specificity. Additionally, we showed that the LAMPTcHSP70 master mix is highly stable during long-term freezing and shorter-term storage 4°C, facilitating large batch preparations and streamlining master mix preparation. Future experiments with very low-input DNA will be valuable to refine the impact of master mix storage on assay performance.
Despite having a lower copy number compared to SatDNA, kDNA, or 18S rRNA, the HSP70 targeted by our LAMP demonstrates high analytical sensitivity with a LoD equivalent to less than 0.07 parasites per reaction. This sensitivity is reasonable for diagnosing acute Chagas, especially congenital Chagas, which is characterized by high parasitemia, particularly after the first month of birth. When analyzing clinical samples, the LAMPTcHsp70 showed a sensitivity of 87.5%. This somewhat reduced sensitivity relative to existing qPCR assays (0.01–0.1 parasite/mL of blood) is likely at least in part the result of differences in target copy number: while parasites harbor an average of 88 copies of HSP70 per genome, they harbor 104 to 105 copies of the DNA satellite region (49). Notably, other LAMP-PCR assays targeting the high-copy satellite DNA show variable concordance with qPCR. Besuschio et al. (32) reported 92% agreement, while more recently, Rojas et al. (30) found 77%–88%. Despite targeting a lower-copy gene, our LAMP-TcHSP70 assay shows an agreement of 84% and thus promising performance for diagnosing acute Chagas disease when qPCR is not available.
Although we cannot rule out the fact that mutations affected the assay performance, our evidence suggests HSP70 mutations are unlikely to be the cause of false-negative results. Preliminary sequencing of a subset of clinical isolates from Santa Cruz, Bolivia, did not reveal any mutations in the parasites circulating locally that would interfere with primer amplification. T. cruzi reproduces asexually, primarily through binary fission, so we would not anticipate rapid accumulation of mutations in this gene under normal conditions. Nevertheless, our understanding of the genetic diversity of T. cruzi in the clinical setting is limited. Additional genome sequencing from clinical samples tested with the LAMP-PCR assay is needed to ensure the optimal design of LAMP primers and to clarify whether gene variants or copy number variations in the HSP70 gene affect the sensitivity of the LAMP-TcHSP70 assay
Another explanation for the lower sensitivity of LAMPTcHsp70 when compared to qPCR is the possibility that some samples contained LAMP inhibitors. Notably, in this study, we used the Bst 2.0 polymerase, a reliable enzyme for DNA amplification in LAMP assays. The advent of more advanced polymerases, which amplify not only DNA but also RNA templates, could significantly enhance both the sensitivity and reaction speed of the assay.
Because our assay failed to detect T. cruzi DNA in 2/16 infants, we explored the integration of a CRISPR-Cas12a system to improve the assay’s sensitivity. Though it did not improve sensitivity, CRISPR-Cas12a did improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the assay, with a more refined readout compared to SYBR Green, which interacts non-specifically with any DNA in the reaction. Thus, the incorporation of the Cas12a system could be valuable in circumstances where samples are suffering from high background amplification.
Regardless of the detection method (SYBR Green or Cas12a), our LAMPTcHSP70 remains at least 12 times cheaper than traditional qPCR assays. Complementarily, using a CTAB buffer-based extraction method, it was possible to isolate DNA directly from whole blood without compromising LAMP-PCR performance at ¼ of the cost. This streamlined workflow enabled both DNA extraction and LAMP-PCR to be completed in under 2 hours. Moreover, we have made the entire LAMPTcHSP70 and CTAB-based protocols publicly available (50, 51). The assay’s ease of use, low cost, and open protocol not only facilitate independent validation of the method but also provide a promising option for large-scale, low-cost diagnosis of suspected acute Chagas infection.
Such large-scale diagnosis is particularly critical in the context of congenital Chagas, an especially important avenue for control of Chagas disease. Approximately 22% of new cases are congenitally transmitted. As a form of acute infection, congenital Chagas is uniquely treatable (5). When diagnosed and treated within the first year of life, congenital T. cruzi infection has a >90% cure rate (4). Therefore, large-scale diagnosis of newborns in endemic regions could significantly increase the number of detected and thus treated cases of acute Chagas. Such population-level diagnosis has been infeasible until now, for reasons related to both logistics and cost. LAMPTcHSP70 overcomes these challenges, being stable and specific and exhibiting good sensitivity when applied to clinical samples.
This study highlights a new target for detecting acute Chagas disease and reinforces LAMP as a promising, low-cost tool to expand diagnosis and treatment in low-income regions. Although not yet a replacement for standard qPCR, LAMP-TcHSP70 offers a valuable alternative where qPCR is unavailable and stands to benefit from continued optimization of enzymes, primers, and reagents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA and strains of reference
We used DNA from reference strains obtained from american type culture collection (ATCC) and biodefense and emerging infections research resources repository (BEI) resources, including T. cruzi strains representative of DTU I (Dm28c NR-49380, Sylvio-X10 ATCC-50823, G NR-49382), DTU II (Y NR-46429, Peru LacZ Clone 4 NR-18960), DTU IV (TcVT-1 NR-46428), and DTU VI (Tulahuen LacZ clone C4 NR-18959, CL). Additionally, we used DNA from Leishmania amazonensis (NR-49247) and Leishmania braziliensis (NR-50608). DNA from T. cruzi Mg Tc I, T. cruzi TcIII col, and T. cruzi TcIV col strains was provided by Dr. Juan David Ramirez from Universidad del Rosario. DNA from the reference strain T. rangeli 078 KP1(-) was donated by Dr. Daniel Urrea from the LIPT laboratory at Universidad del Tolima. All remaining isolates were obtained from Dr. Gilman’s repository (IRB00007176).
Population of study
Sample collection was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (IRB 19-3014) and Hospital De La Mujer Dr. Percy Boland (Protocol 036). Pregnant women were recruited at Hospital De La Mujer Dr. Percy Boland in Santa Cruz, Bolivia, over 12 months between June 2023 and June 2024. A total of 1,344 mothers were enrolled, 252 of whom were seropositive for Chagas disease. Umbilical cord blood samples were collected at birth, and infant peripheral blood was obtained post-delivery. Based on routine TaqMan SatDNA qPCR, 16 infants were diagnosed with congenital Chagas. This study evaluated samples from 100 infants, including 84 controls and 16 cases of congenital Chagas that had sufficient DNA left over after performing the routine diagnostics. All samples/patient IDs were deidentified and not known to anyone outside the research group.
Commercial kit DNA extractions
DNA from parasite pellets was purified using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Catalog number or CN: 51104) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA from patient samples was purified using the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany; REF: 11796828001) as previously described (40). An internal amplification control (IAC) was prepared at 40 pg/µL. For blood samples, 300 µL of blood was mixed with Guanidine/EDTA and 5 µL of IAC (40 pg/µL). Additionally, 40 µL of Proteinase K (20 mg/mL) was added for lysis and incubated at 70°C for 10 minutes. All DNA samples were resuspended in 50 µL of DNAse/RNAse-free water.
Validatory satDNA TaqMan qPCR
A duplex qPCR was conducted for all clinical samples following the protocol previously published by Mayta et al. (40). Briefly, the PCR targets the satellite sequence of the nuclear genome of T. cruzi and IAC. The qPCR was performed according to published methods, using primers Cruzi 1 (5′–ASTCGGCTGATCGTTTTCGA–3′) and Cruzi 2 (5′–AATTCCTCCAAGCAGCGGATA–3′) to amplify a 166 bp fragment of nuclear satellite DNA. The probe cruzi 3 (5′–CACACACTGGACACCAA–3′) was labeled with 5′FAM (6–carboxyfluorescein) and 3′MGB (minor groove binder)(40).
Alignment of HSP70 gene sequences
The HSP70 sequence of T. cruzi Brazil A4 (TcBrA4_0077200, TriTryps DB) was used as input for a BLAST search against T. cruzi strains, Leishmania, and T. rangeli strains available in the TriTryps and National Center for Biotechnology Information databases. Representative sequences with the highest identity were retained for each strain. A total of 51 representative sequences were evaluated: 36 from T. cruzi, 11 from Leishmania, and four from T. rangeli. The HSP70 sequences were analyzed using a neighbor-joining tree with Geneious Prime 2024.0.5 software. The parameters used were global alignment with free gaps, a cost matrix of 70% similarity (IUB) (5.0/−4.5), and the Tamura-Nei genetic distance model.
LAMPTcHSP70 primer design
Upon sequence alignment, primers were manually designed in regions with high coverage and identity for T. cruzi strains. Sequence alignment and primer annotation were completed using the Geneious Prime 2024.0.5 software. The primers were designed to maximize variants in Leishmania or T. rangeli homologous sequences. The likelihood of self-dimer and heterodimers was evaluated by the Oligoanalyzer IDT tool using default parameters.
LAMP master mix and incubation
The master mix preparation was adapted from a protocol by Ordóñez et al. (33). The master mix was prepared in batches of 50–100 reactions in 23 µL and contained: 40 pmol FIP primer, 40 pmol BIP primer, 0.5 pmol F3 primer, 0.5 pmol B3 primer, 0.5 pmol LF primer, 0.5 pmol LB primer, 2.5 mM dNTPs (NEB, CN: N0447S), 0.8 mM MgSO₄ (NEB, CN: B1003S), 1 M Betaine (Sigma-Aldrich, CN: B0300-5VL), 1× Isothermal Amplification Buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.8, NEB, CN: B0537S), and 8 U Bst Polymerase 2.0 WarmStart (NEB, CN: M0537L).
Two microliters of DNA template were added to the master mix to achieve a total volume of 25 µL. SYBR Green I dye (2 µL of a 1:10 dilution) (Invitrogen, CN: S-7567) was then added to the tube lid of the tube. By default, the reaction was incubated at 65°C for 60 minutes. After incubation, the vials were centrifuged to mix the dye with the amplified product.
LAMP visualization
The amplified products were initially visualized by the eye using a black background. For quantitative analysis, the amplified products were imaged using an Azure Biosystems 200 gel imager with a 365 nm light source and a 595 nm emission filter. The mean fluorescence intensity was calculated using the ROI manager function of Fiji2 software.
Additionally, during standardization, the amplified products were also visualized on agarose gel. The products were pre-incubated at 80°C for 10 minutes to deactivate the enzyme and stop the reaction. Then, 3 µL of the amplified products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel (Invitrogen, CN: 16-500-500), pre-stained with 0.2 µg/ml ethidium bromide. The electrophoresis was performed at 100V for 35 minutes.
Analytical LoD LAMPTcHSP70
DNA from seven T. cruzi strains (Dm28c_DTU-I, Sylvio_DTU-I, Perú_DTU-II, Y-DTU-II, TcIII_Col_DTU-III, VT-1_DTU-II, Tulahuen_DTU-VI, CL-DTU-VI) was purified and quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher, CN: Q32850). The DNA concentrations were normalized to 0.5 ng/µL, resulting in a total of 1 ng in 2 µL when added to the master mix. The DNA stocks were initially subjected to a broad 1:10 dilution. Two representative strains (Dm28c_DTU-I and Perú_DTU-II) were then further diluted in a series of 1:2 dilutions to refine the LoD. The analytical LoD was defined as the lowest DNA concentration that resulted in positive amplification.
To calculate the equivalent number of genome/parasite copies, we used the formula:
The genome size for nine strains (G, Dm28c, Tc1161, Y, Esmeraldo, SO3-cl5, CL, CL14, and CL Brener) was obtained from Souza et al. (52). The LoD was fixed at 0.00125 ng. The estimated number of copies was then divided by the median gene dose for HSP70 in T. cruzi, which is 88, as determined using the gene copy number tool of TriTrypDB (https://tritrypdb.org/tritrypdb/app/search/transcript/GenesByCopyNumber).
Stability of LAMP-TcHSP70 across different incubation times
The LAMP-TcHSP70 reaction was incubated at 65°C for 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, and 120 minutes. Each incubation time was tested in at least four replicates. Reactions were seeded with 2 μL containing ~2 pg of T. cruzi (Dm28c strain) DNA as a positive control and 50 ng of human DNA as a negative control. For no-template controls, DNA was replaced with molecular-grade water. Immediately after incubation, samples were spun down, and the amplification was detected by eye and fluorescence.
Stability of the complete LAMPTcHSP70 master mix at 4°C
Twenty-four LAMP reactions were prepared and stored at 4°C. Four reactions were randomly selected and subjected to amplification at six time points (weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8 post-storage). At each time point, three reactions were seeded with 1 ng of T. cruzi DNA (Dm28c_DTU-I), and the remaining vial was loaded with 50 ng of human DNA (negative control). Immediately after incubation, samples were spun down to mix the SYBR Green, and fluorescence was measured using a 365 nm excitation light source and a 595 nm emission filter.
Stability of the complete LAMPTcHSP70 master mix at −20°C
Twenty-four LAMP reactions were prepared and stored at −20°C. Four reactions were randomly selected, thawed, and subjected to amplification at six time points (months 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 post-storage). At each time point, three vials were seeded with 1 ng of T. cruzi DNA (Dm28c_DTU-I), and the remaining vial was loaded with 50 ng of human DNA (negative control). Immediately after incubation, samples were spun down to mix the SYBR Green, and fluorescence was measured using a 365 nm excitation light source and a 595 nm emission filter.
One-pot visual detection using Alt-R CRISPR-Cas12a
The Cas12a-LAMP one-pot detection system was adapted from Qin et al. (39). In a vial containing the previously described LAMP master mix, 2 µL of DNA template was added, followed by 35 µL of PCR-grade mineral oil. On top of the vial, 20 µL of the Cas12a reaction mix was added, which included 2× NEB Buffer r2.1 (NEB, CN: B6002S), 8 U RNAase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher, CN: N8080119), and 0.125 µM gRNA (5′- /AlTR1/rUrArArUrUrUrCrUrArCrUrArArGrUrGrUrArGrArUrCrGrUrCrArArUrGrCrGrCrUrCrGrCrGrCrUrGrU/AlTR2/−3′), 0.125 µM Alt-R L.b. Cas12a (Cpf1) Ultra (IDT, CN: 430891851), and 0.4 µM ssDNA probe (/56-FAM/TTATTATT/3IABkFQ/). The reaction was incubated at 65°C for 40 minutes. After incubation, the reaction was briefly spun down for 10 seconds to mix the Cas12a reaction mix with the LAMP amplified products. The mixture was then incubated again at 37°C for 20 minutes. Products were imaged under LED blue light using an Azure Biosystems 200 imaging system.
Comparison of CTAB-based and commercial kit DNA extraction for LAMP-PCR
Fresh EDTA-treated human blood was spiked with T. cruzi (1 × 10⁴ parasites/mL), followed by three serial 10-fold dilutions in blood. Two T. cruzi strains (Tulahuen-DTU VI and Y-DTU II) were tested across eight independent dilution series. DNA was extracted from 300 µL of whole blood using two methods: (i) the Roche High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (commercial method), following the manufacturer’s protocol, and (ii) a CTAB-based protocol (proposed alternative). For CTAB extraction, 500 µL of CTAB lysis buffer (2% CTAB, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl) was added to blood, vortexed, and incubated at 65°C for 10 minutes, followed by 1 minutes on ice. Protein precipitation was performed with 500 µL of 5 M NaCl, followed by centrifugation (12,000 × g, 2 minutes). The supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of cold isopropanol, centrifuged (12,000 × g, 5 minutes), and the pellet was washed with 70% and 100% ethanol, dried at 70°C for 3 minutes, and resuspended in 50 µL of pre-heated nuclease-free water. DNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer.
LAMPTcHSP70 reactions were performed using 5 µL containing ~100 ng DNA, incubated at 65 °C for 1 h, and visually assessed with SYBR Green. Differences in DNA yield were assessed with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. To evaluate how the extraction method affected LAMP-PCR performance, we fitted a logistic-regression model: Detection ~ Method × log₁₀(Concentration). The CTAB-based method was used only for this comparison, while the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit was the default for all other blood samples.
Diagnostic test performance metrics
The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa agreement were estimated using the epiR (version 2.0.76) package in R, using a confidence level of 95%.
Cost estimation for LAMPTcHSP70, TaqMan SatDNA qPCR, and CTAB protocol
To calculate the total cost per reaction, the following categories were considered: reagents, disposable materials, personnel time, and permanent materials. All prices were based on costs in the United States. Annual depreciation for permanent materials was estimated using the formula:
HSP70 amplicon sequencing
Parasites were isolated from patients in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. The parasites were grown in culture for 3–4 months before cryopreservation. Parasites were then extracted with QIAmp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QIAGEN, CN: 51104), and Illumina sequencing libraries were prepared with NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, E7645L) and barcoded with unique dual indexes for multiplexing. Libraries were sequenced in an Illumina NovaseqX with PE 150 bp reads. Reads aligned to T. cruzi were assembled using Spades v4.0.0 (53), with kmer lengths of 21,33,55,77,99, and 127 in paired-end mode. Heat shock protein sequences from these genomes were extracted from assemblies using a BLAST search against HSP70.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health R01AI151295 awarded to N.B.
We thank Dr. Daniel Urrea from the Universidad del Tolima in Colombia, and Dr. Juan David Ramirez from the Universidad del Rosario in Colombia for donating some of the DNA samples evaluated in this study.
Contributor Information
Monica R. Mugnier, Email: mmugnie1@jhu.edu.
Denis Sereno, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Montpellier, France.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. A detailed protocol for the LAMP-PCR assay is available at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvwbpqzvmk/v1. A detailed protocol for the CTAB DNA extraction protocol is available at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.rm7vz9mnrgx1/v1. R code used to estimate the specificity, sensitivity, and Kappa agreement is available at http://rpubs.com/sgutierr/1262176.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00172-25.
T. cruzi HSP70 distance and identity.
Primer sequences.
Representative alignment for HSP70 sequences.
Heterodimer evaluation.
Analytical limit of detection.
Comparison of the limit of detection between LAMP and qPCR.
Cost estimation for DNA extraction and LAMP-PCR.
LAMP extended incubation and long-term storage.
LAMP performance in clinical samples.
Extended LAMP stability and alternative DNA extraction method performance.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. WHO . 2010. Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. World Health Organ. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/242316/WER9006_33-44.PDF [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. PAHO . 2024. Chagas disease. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/topics/chagas-disease#:~:text=In%20the%20Americas%2C%20Chagas%20disease
- 3. WHO . 2023. Chagas disease (also known as American Trypanosomiasis). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis)#:~:text=Chagas%20disease%2C%20also%20known%20as,cruzi
- 4. Messenger LA, Bern C. 2018. Congenital chagas disease: current diagnostics, limitations and future perspectives. Curr Opin Infect Dis 31:415–421. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Edwards MS, Montgomery SP. 2021. Congenital chagas disease: progress toward implementation of pregnancy-based screening. Curr Opin Infect Dis 34:538–545. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nguyen T, Waseem M. 2024. Chagas Disease. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Edwards MS, Stimpert KK, Bialek SR, Montgomery SP. 2019. Evaluation and management of congenital chagas disease in the United States. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 8:461–469. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piz018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jackson Y, Wyssa B, Chappuis F. 2020. Tolerance to nifurtimox and benznidazole in adult patients with chronic chagas’ disease. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:690–696. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ribeiro I, Sevcsik A-M, Alves F, Diap G, Don R, Harhay MO, Chang S, Pecoul B. 2009. New, improved treatments for chagas disease: from the R&D pipeline to the patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3:e484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pecoul B, Batista C, Stobbaerts E, Ribeiro I, Vilasanjuan R, Gascon J, Pinazo MJ, Moriana S, Gold S, Pereiro A, Navarro M, Torrico F, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ. 2016. The BENEFIT Trial: where do we go from here? PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Gomes YM, Lorena VMB, Luquetti AO. 2009. Diagnosis of chagas disease: what has been achieved? what remains to be done with regard to diagnosis and follow up studies? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104 Suppl 1:115–121. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000900017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. de Freitas VLT, da Silva SCV, Sartori AM, Bezerra RC, Westphalen EVN, Molina TD, Teixeira ARL, Ibrahim KY, Shikanai-Yasuda MA. 2011. Real-time PCR in HIV/Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection with and without chagas disease reactivation: association with HIV viral load and CD4 level. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e1277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Piron M, Fisa R, Casamitjana N, López-Chejade P, Puig L, Vergés M, Gascón J, Gómez i Prat J, Portús M, Sauleda S. 2007. Development of a real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood samples. Acta Trop 103:195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bua J, Volta BJ, Velazquez EB, Ruiz AM, Rissio AMD, Cardoni RL. 2012. Vertical transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection: quantification of parasite burden in mothers and their children by parasite DNA amplification. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 106:623–628. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hagström L, Marques ALP, Nitz N, Hecht MM. 2019. The use of qPCR in human chagas disease: a systematic review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 19:875–894. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1659729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Messenger LA, Gilman RH, Verastegui M, Galdos-Cardenas G, Sanchez G, Valencia E, Sanchez L, Malaga E, Rendell VR, Jois M, Shah V, Santos N, Abastoflor MDC, LaFuente C, Colanzi R, Bozo R, Bern C. 2017. For the working group on chagas disease in Bolivia and Peru. 2017. toward improving early diagnosis of congenital chagas disease in an endemic setting. Clin Infect Dis 65:268–275. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schijman AG, Bisio M, Orellana L, Sued M, Duffy T, Mejia Jaramillo AM, Cura C, Auter F, Veron V, Qvarnstrom Y, et al. 2011. International study to evaluate PCR methods for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lopez-Albizu C, Rivero R, Ballering G, Freilij H, Santini MS, Bisio MMC. 2023. Laboratory diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection: a narrative review. Front Parasitol 2:1138375. doi: 10.3389/fpara.2023.1138375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pascual-Vázquez G, Alonso-Sardón M, Rodríguez-Alonso B, Pardo-Lledías J, Romero Alegría A, Fernández-Soto P, Muñoz Bellido JL, Muro A, Belhassen-García M. 2023. Molecular diagnosis of chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty 12:95. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01143-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Qvarnstrom Y, Schijman AG, Veron V, Aznar C, Steurer F, da Silva AJ. 2012. Sensitive and specific detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in clinical specimens using a multi-target real-time PCR approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Oliveira I, Torrico F, Muñoz J, Gascon J. 2010. Congenital transmission of chagas disease: a clinical approach. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:945–956. doi: 10.1586/eri.10.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. CDC . 2012. Phases and forms of chagas disease. Cent dis control prev. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/cme/chagas/lesson_2/1.html#:~:text=However%2C%20approximately%2020%25%20to%2030,referred%20to%20as%20Chagas%20cardiomyopathy
- 23. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T. 2000. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28:E63. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Piepenburg O, Williams CH, Stemple DL, Armes NA. 2006. DNA detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol 4:e204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Yan S, Li C, Lan H, Pan D, Wu Y. 2024. Comparison of four isothermal amplification techniques: LAMP, SEA, CPA, and RPA for the identification of chicken adulteration. Food Control 159:110302. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Antinori S, Ridolfo AL, Grande R, Galimberti L, Casalini G, Giacomelli A, Milazzo L. 2021. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the diagnosis of imported malaria: a narrative review. Infez Med 29:355–365. doi: 10.53854/liim-2903-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Qian J, Boswell SA, Chidley C, Lu Z-X, Pettit ME, Gaudio BL, Fajnzylber JM, Ingram RT, Ward RH, Li JZ, Springer M. 2020. An enhanced isothermal amplification assay for viral detection. Nat Commun 11:5920. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19258-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Puri M, Kaur Brar H, Madan E, Srinivasan R, Rawat K, Gorthi SS, Kumari G, Sah R, Ojha SB, Panigrahi S, Dhangadamajhi G, Muthuswami R, Singh S, Madhubala R. 2022. Rapid diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria using a point-of-care loop-mediated isothermal amplification device. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:961832. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.961832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Nwe MK, Jangpromma N, Taemaitree L. 2024. Evaluation of molecular inhibitors of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Sci Rep 14:5916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55241-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rojas Panozo L, Rivera Nina S, Wehrendt DP, Casellas A, Pinto L, Mendez S, Kuo C-W, Lozano DF, Ortiz L, Pinazo M-J, Picado A, Sanz S, Abril M, Gascon J, Wong S, Schijman AG, Torrico F, Alonso-Padilla J. 2024. Evaluation and validation of a PrintrLab-based LAMP assay to identify Trypanosoma cruzi in newborns in Bolivia: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Microbe 5:100887. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00110-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bisio MMC, Rivero R, Gonzalez N, Ballering G, D’Amico I, Kessler C, Moroni S, Moscatelli G, Ruiz AM, Altcheh J. 2021. Diagnostic accuracy of two molecular tools for diagnosis of congenital chagas disease. Mol Diagn Ther 25:791–801. doi: 10.1007/s40291-021-00553-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Besuschio SA, Picado A, Muñoz-Calderón A, Wehrendt DP, Fernández M, Benatar A, Diaz-Bello Z, Irurtia C, Cruz I, Ndung’u JM, Cafferata ML, Montenegro G, Sosa Estani S, Lucero RH, Alarcón de Noya B, Longhi SA, Schijman AG. 2020. Trypanosoma cruzi loop-mediated isothermal amplification (Trypanosoma cruzi Loopamp) kit for detection of congenital, acute and chagas disease reactivation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14:e0008402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ordóñez D, Fernández-Soto P, Fernández-Martín AM, Crego-Vicente B, Febrer-Sendra B, Diego J-B, Vicente B, López-Abán J, Belhassen-García M, Muro A, Patarroyo MA. 2020. A Trypanosoma cruzi genome tandem repetitive satellite DNA sequence as a molecular marker for a LAMP assay for diagnosing chagas’ disease. Dis Markers 2020:8074314. doi: 10.1155/2020/8074314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rivero R, Bisio M, Velázquez EB, Esteva MI, Scollo K, González NL, Altcheh J, Ruiz AM. 2017. Rapid detection of Trypanosoma cruzi by colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a potential novel tool for the detection of congenital Chagas infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 89:26–28. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, Tibayrenc M, Macedo AM, Teixeira MMG, Schijman AG, Llewellyn MS, Lages-Silva E, Machado CR, Andrade SG, Sturm NR. 2012. The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol 12:240–253. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mu XJ, Lu ZJ, Kong Y, Lam HYK, Gerstein MB. 2011. Analysis of genomic variation in non-coding elements using population-scale sequencing data from the 1000 genomes project. Nucleic Acids Res 39:7058–7076. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Yu E-M, Yoshinaga T, Jalufka FL, Ehsan H, Mark Welch DB, Kaneko G. 2021. The complex evolution of the metazoan HSP70 gene family. Sci Rep 11:17794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97192-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Drini S, Criscuolo A, Lechat P, Imamura H, Skalický T, Rachidi N, Lukeš J, Dujardin J-C, Späth GF. 2016. Species- and strain-specific adaptation of the HSP70 super family in pathogenic trypanosomatids. Genome Biol Evol 8:1980–1995. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Qin C, Liu J, Zhu W, Zeng M, Xu K, Ding J, Zhou H, Zhu J, Ke Y, Li LY, Sheng G, Li Z, Luo H, Jiang S, Chen K, Ding X, Meng H. 2022. One-pot visual detection of African Swine Fever virus using CRISPR-Cas12a. Front Vet Sci 9:962438. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.962438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Mayta H, Romero YK, Pando A, Verastegui M, Tinajeros F, Bozo R, Henderson-Frost J, Colanzi R, Flores J, Lerner R, Bern C, Gilman RH. 2019. For the chagas working group in Perú and Bolivia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13:e0007024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lee S-Y, Oh S-W. 2022. Filtration-based LAMP-CRISPR/Cas12a system for the rapid, sensitive and visualized detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Talanta 241:123186. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wang Y, Li J, Li S, Zhu X, Wang X, Huang J, Yang X, Tai J. 2021. LAMP-CRISPR-Cas12-based diagnostic platform for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using real-time fluorescence or lateral flow test. Microchim Acta 188:347. doi: 10.1007/s00604-021-04985-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Yu Z, Liu H, Chen Z, Shao Y, Wang Z, Cheng F, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Tu J, Song X, Qi K. 2024. LAMP assay coupled with a CRISPR/Cas12a system for the rapid and ultrasensitive detection of porcine circovirus-like virus in the field. Anal Bioanal Chem 416:363–372. doi: 10.1007/s00216-023-05020-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nguyen LT, Rananaware SR, Pizzano BLM, Stone BT, Jain PK. 2022. Clinical validation of engineered CRISPR/Cas12a for rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection. Commun Med 2:7. doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00066-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hakim JMC, Guiterrez SAG, Duran A, Malaga-Machaca E, Duque C, Singer L, Colanzi R, Sherbuk JE, Bern C, Gilman RH, Messenger LA, Mugnier MR, Working Group on Chagas Disease in Bolivia and Peru . 2025. Clinical Trypanosoma cruzi isolates share a common antigen repertoire that is absent from culture adapted strains. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.04.657671 [DOI]
- 46. Besuschio SA, Llano Murcia M, Benatar AF, Monnerat S, Cruz I, Picado A, Curto M de LÁ, Kubota Y, Wehrendt DP, Pavia P, Mori Y, Puerta C, Ndung’u JM, Schijman AG. 2017. Analytical sensitivity and specificity of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit prototype for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in human blood samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11:e0005779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Amaral C, Antunes W, Moe E, Duarte AG, Lima LMP, Santos C, Gomes IL, Afonso GS, Vieira R, Teles HSS, Reis MS, da Silva MAR, Henriques AM, Fevereiro M, Ventura MR, Serrano M, Pimentel C. 2021. A molecular test based on RT-LAMP for rapid, sensitive and inexpensive colorimetric detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Sci Rep 11:16430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95799-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. de Oliveira Coelho B, Sanchuki HBS, Zanette DL, Nardin JM, Morales HMP, Fornazari B, Aoki MN, Blanes L. 2021. Essential properties and pitfalls of colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification as a point-of-care test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Mol Med 27:30. doi: 10.1186/s10020-021-00289-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Duffy T, Bisio M, Altcheh J, Burgos JM, Diez M, Levin MJ, Favaloro RR, Freilij H, Schijman AG. 2009. Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3:e419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gutierrez S, Condori J, Equilia S, Malaga E, Karla Velarde J, Basma L. 2025. LAMP-PCR targeting HSP70 for screening chagas disease v1. Protocols.io. doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvwbpqzvmk/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gutierrez S, Condori J. 2025. Blood DNA extraction protocol compatible with LAMP-PCR for T. cruzi detection. v1. Protocols.io. doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.rm7vz9mnrgx1/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Souza RT, Lima FM, Barros RM, Cortez DR, Santos MF, Cordero EM, Ruiz JC, Goldenberg S, Teixeira MMG, da Silveira JF. 2011. Genome size, karyotype polymorphism and chromosomal evolution in Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS One 6:e23042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. 2020. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 70:e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
T. cruzi HSP70 distance and identity.
Primer sequences.
Representative alignment for HSP70 sequences.
Heterodimer evaluation.
Analytical limit of detection.
Comparison of the limit of detection between LAMP and qPCR.
Cost estimation for DNA extraction and LAMP-PCR.
LAMP extended incubation and long-term storage.
LAMP performance in clinical samples.
Extended LAMP stability and alternative DNA extraction method performance.
Data Availability Statement
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. A detailed protocol for the LAMP-PCR assay is available at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvwbpqzvmk/v1. A detailed protocol for the CTAB DNA extraction protocol is available at dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.rm7vz9mnrgx1/v1. R code used to estimate the specificity, sensitivity, and Kappa agreement is available at http://rpubs.com/sgutierr/1262176.







