Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 10;26(6):bbaf586. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf586

Table 2.

Benchmark results of ProjectSVR and other reference mapping algorithms.

Task Method Accuracy ARI Model building (seconds) Reference mapping (seconds)
PBMC De novo integration (scVI) 0.791 0.649 NA NA
ProjectSVR 0.733 0.585 70.24 21.35
symphony 0.694 0.577 304.04 3.52
projectTILs 0.487 0.412 4943.19 1106.34
Seurat 0.753 0.600 1351.65 677.13
scArches 0.797 0.689 373.53 156.81
iNMF 0.640 0.532 100.20 3.53
SCALEX 0.685 0.527 568.68 99.07
MFI De novo integration (fastMNN) 0.895 0.848 NA NA
ProjectSVR 0.697 0.556 77.07 10.89
symphony 0.626 0.492 85.97 1.95
projectTILs 0.107 0.259 1454.18 326.04
Seurat 0.740 0.577 88.46 862.62
scArches 0.739 0.553 316.77 110.17
iNMF 0.566 0.394 74.90 2.54
SCALEX 0.523 0.401 493.47 61.11
mTCA De novo integration (scANVI) 0.993 0.995 NA NA
ProjectSVR 0.930 0.952 663.98 83.82
symphony 0.782 0.772 261.56 3.26
projectTILs 0.690 0.750 4192.72 1081.52
Seurat 0.916 0.949 960.07 1705.35
scArches 0.895 0.955 329.19 135.79
iNMF 0.726 0.671 200.96 5.26
SCALEX 0.778 0.906 498.32 192.24

Note: ARI: Adjusted rand index, Bold values indicate results from the present method; italic values indicate the best result among all comparison methods.