Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2025 Nov 9;10(12):1138–1142. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2025.2582528

Complete chloroplast genomes analysis of Lamium barbatum and Leucas ciliata (Lamiaceae)

Qing Du a,b,, Baoxiang Xue c, Benyi Tan d
PMCID: PMC12604122  PMID: 41230035

Abstract

The two Lamioideae species, Lamium barbatum Siebold & Zucc. 1846, is distributed across Europe, North Africa, Asia, and North America, while Leucas ciliata Hochst. ex Benth. 1829 is found in southern China and Southeast Asia. We sequenced their complete chloroplast genomes using the Illumina platform, obtaining lengths of 150,887 bp and 151,259 bp, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed Lamium barbatum is closely related to four other Lamium species, including Lamium takeshimense, Lamium album, Lamium amplexicaule, and Lamium galeobdolon. The Leucas ciliata species clusters with Leucas mollissima. These findings provide valuable data for species identification, evolutionary research, and conservation genetics.

Keywords: Lamium barbatum, Leucas ciliata, chloroplast genome, SSR analysis, phylogenetic relationship

Introduction

The Lamiaceae is the sixth-largest angiosperm family with worldwide distribution. Most genera are predominantly distributed in Asia, Africa, and Europe, with approximately 1387 species within 100 genera in China (Chang et al. 2014). Many species possess significant economic, ornamental, aromatic, and medicinal value, as well as the ability to activate blood circulation (Guzman and Molina 2018). The two species of Lamium album subsp. barbatum Siebold & Zucc. 1846 and Leucas ciliata Hochst. ex Benth. 1829 in this study belong to different genera within the Lamioideae subfamily of the Lamiaceae family, as classified by chloroplast regions (Cantino and Sanders 1986; Bendiksby et al. 2011). Previous studies have shown that Lamium album subsp. barbatum contains various bioactive compounds, including flavonoid glycosides, phenylpropanoid glycosides, sterols, steroids, and cycloartane glycosides, which can be used for the treatment of traumatic injuries, pediatric malnutrition, and diseases affecting the uterine and urinary systems (Tjendana Tjhin et al. 2024). As species of the same subfamily, Leucas ciliata and Anisomeles indica are two varieties of ‘Fang feng’ in the Lamiaceae family, including differentiated main chemicals (Gui et al. 1991). The species Leucas ciliata contains tricin, cirsilineol, daucosterol, leucasin, and 17 phenolic acid compounds, which have effects on regulating liver blood flow, removing wind, and detoxifying (Wang et al. 2012; Kuang et al. 2024).

The chloroplast genome and its key genes, due to their highly conserved structure and moderate mutation rate, play a crucial role in the biosynthesis and metabolism of plant chemical components, particularly in the phylogenetic development of biodiversity species (Wang et al. 2024). By regulating photosynthetic rates across plant species, chloroplasts significantly influence growth efficiency, reproductive success, and breeding outcomes (Zhang et al. 2023). These organelles not only act as energy production hubs but also drive carbon assimilation processes, fundamentally shaping ecosystem energy flows. Crucially, chloroplasts are deeply intertwined with plant metabolism. Many bioactive compounds in traditional medicinal plants originate from secondary metabolites synthesized within chloroplasts, demonstrating a close evolutionary connection between chloroplast evolution and their medicinal value (Gomez-Casati et al. 2022). The chloroplast genomes from 288 species in 191 genera of the Lamiaceae family were used to construct a phylogenetic relationship, which revealed new findings indicating that these species form twelve supported, updated clades (Li et al. 2016). Many species of the subfamily and genera of Lamioideae have been studied in terms of their chloroplast genome and molecular systematics, including Lamium takeshimense, Thymus mongolicus, Lycopus lucidus, and Mentha canadensis (Huaizhu et al. 2019, 2020; Park et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2021). Whereas the complete chloroplast genomes of the two species in this study have not been reported, nor have their morphological and genomic characteristics been compared. Therefore, this study addresses these gaps to explore the analysis of chloroplast genomes and their evolutionary relationships, gaining a better understanding of these species.

Materials and methods

Fresh leaves of Lamium barbatum and Leucas ciliata (Figure 1) were collected from Zuojia County (44°3′18″ N, 126°5′54″ E), Jilin City of Jilin Province, China, and Xuwen County (20°16′48ʺ N, 110°11′24ʺ E), Zhanjiang City of Guangdong Province, China. The specimens were deposited at the National Plant Specimen Resource Center (Li Zexin, pelizexin@ibcas.ac.cn) and Specimen Museum, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiangsu Province (Dong Xiaoyu, nas@cnbg.net), under the voucher numbers Duq2023013 and Duq2022080. The two plants were identified by Dr. Linqinwen, Dr. Liubing, and Dr. Limin (Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, linqinwen83@163.com and liubing@ibcas.ac.cn), Mr. Louanrui (Bozhou Planting Agriculture Technology Co., Ltd., Bozhou, China, 2281384216@qq.com), and the authors.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Morphological characteristics of the Lamium barbatum (a) and Leucas ciliata (b).

Characteristics: (a) herbs, perennial, rhizome with long underground creeping branches; stem is solitary, erect, quadrangular, hollow, and nearly hairless; the leaf is ovate or reniform to obovate; the calyx is bell-shaped, and the corolla is white or light yellow. (b) Herbs, annual, the stem is erect or twisted at the top, densely covered with golden yellow long and hard hairs; the leaves are ovate-lanceolate or lanceolate, and the corolla is white or purple with slightly soft hairs on the outside near the throat. The photographs were taken by Xue Baoxiang on 2 June 2023 (a) and by Lou Anrui on 13 April 2023 (b).

The total genomic DNA of the two species was extracted using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The quality detection of DNA purity and concentration was executed in a DNA library at the laboratory of Genepioneer Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The qualified samples were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform (San Diego, CA). The raw data were filtered (Q30 is greater than 85%), assembled, annotated, corrected, and visualized using GetOrganelle v1.7.5 and CPGview software as described in the reference, as well as the analysis of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) (http://www.1kmpg.cn/cpgview, Jin et al. 2020; Du et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2023). The sequencing depth has been aligned, acquired, treated, and represented using CPtools, Bowtie2, and ggplot2 software (Langmead and Salzberg 2012; Wickham 2016; Huang et al. 2024). After that, the annotated sequences from the two chloroplast genomes were submitted to the GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to obtain the accession numbers PV802395.1 (Lamium barbatum) and PV802396.1 (Leucas ciliata).

The phylogenetic analysis was constructed based on complete chloroplast genomes of the two species and 17 other species downloaded from the NCBI database using the Phylosuite software (version 1.2.3, http://phylosuite.jushengwu.com/, Xiang et al. 2023). The species Lithospermum erythrorhizon served as the outgroup species. The phylogenetic method of construction and illustration referred to the publication (Yuan et al. 2024) with 1000 replications as the assessing bootstrap standard.

Results

The length of the chloroplast genome of Lamium barbatum and Leucas ciliata is 150,887 bp and 151,259 bp, with the typical quadripartite structure (Figure S1), comprising a large single-copy region (LSC, 82,610 bp and 82,412 bp), a small single-copy region (SSC, 17,301 bp and 17,585 bp), and two inverted repeat regions (IR, 25,488 bp and 25,631 bp by each) (Figure 2, Table S1). The GC contents of the two total chloroplast genomes are 38.5% and 38.6% and that of IR regions (43.39% and 43.41%) is higher than LSC regions (36.84% and 36.87%) and SSC regions (32.76% and 32.55%). After mapping and calculation, the coverage ranges of the sequencing data were all 99.86%. The sequencing depth range of genomes varied from 33× to 3830× (Lamium barbatum) and from 26× to 7046× (Leucas ciliata) (Figure S2). A total of 131 genes were identified within the two species, including 87 (Lamium barbatum) and 86 (Leucas ciliata) protein-coding genes, 36 (Lamium barbatum) and 37 (Leucas ciliata) tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes (Table S1). Seven protein-coding genes are duplicated in the IR regions, including rps7, rps12, rpl2, rpl23, ndhB, ycf2, and ycf15 (Table S2). Within the two studied chloroplast genomes, cis-splicing was detected in twelve genes, and two trans-splicing rps12 genes were also identified at diverse locations (Figures S3 and S4 and Table S3), which included two introns and three exons, in addition to the other two cis-splicing genes, ycf3 and clpP.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Graphic representation in the chloroplast genomes of the Lamium barbatum (a, PV802395.1) and Leucas ciliata (b, PV802396.1) using CPGView (http://www.1kmpg.cn/cpgview).

Each map contains seven circles, each representing the distribution of repeats, microsatellite sequences, the size of the four regions, GC content, and genes (Du et al. 2022).

In this study, a total of 22 and 26 SSRs with the length range of 10–41 bp and 10–87 bp were detected in the two chloroplast genomes of Lamium barbatum and Leucas ciliata (Table S4), among which were two types of repeats, that is, most of the mono-nucleotide repeats (18 for Lamium album subsp. barbatum and 20 for Leucas ciliata), and the dinucleotide repeats (three for Lamium barbatum and four for Leucas ciliata). The number of complex repeats within the two species is one and two by each species (Table S5). The SSR sequences of each species can be amplified by designing primers at both ends through PCR to obtain the target DNA sequences. The size of the amplification products is then analyzed by gel electrophoresis to determine the genotype of each sample.

The results revealed that the two species clustered into a single larger clade, whereas they were located at different branches, with closely related species in the same genus (Figure 3). Within this framework, Lamium barbatum was found to be most closely related to the four Lamium species, including Lamium takeshimense, Lamium album, Lamium amplexicaule, and Lamium galeobdolon. The species Leucas ciliata was grouped with Leucas mollissima into a single clade. All the evolutionary clades were well-supported, united groups with high bootstrap values (99–100%). The two studied species, although both belonging to the tribe Lamiinae of the subfamily Lamioideae, exhibit evolutionary development that indicates a close relationship, and their similar morphology (leaves and flowers) also supports this kinship.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree in the 19 studied species based on the nucleotide sequences of 68 shared CDS genes within the complete genomes.

The bootstrap support value is 99–100% on each branch after 1000 bootstrap replicates. The bar of scaled branch is 0.005. The accession numbers of the two new chloroplast genomes are given as PV802395.1 (Lamium barbatum) and PV802396.1 (Leucas ciliata), listed behind their respective Latin names (in a purple square frame). The species name and accession number of the other 17 species downloaded are Lamium takeshimense (MN240520.1) (Park et al. 2019), Lamium album (NC_036971.1) (Park et al. 2019), Lamium amplexicaule (MT473770.1) (Zhao et al. 2021), Lamium galeobdolon (NC_036972.1) (Park et al. 2019), Leucas mollissima (OR565912.1), Thymus mongolicus (NC_046520.1) (Huaizhu et al. 2020), Mentha canadensis (NC_044082.1) (Huaizhu et al. 2019), Lycopus lucidus (PV558881.1) (Wang et al. 2021), Rosmarinus officinalis (NC_027259.1) (Wang et al. 2021), Lagopsis supina (NC_058246.1) (Bendiksby et al. 2011), Phlomis fruticosa (NC_065868.1) (Zhao et al. 2021), Phlomoides rotata (NC_065733.1) (Bendiksby et al. 2011), Galeopsis bifida (NC_071846.1) (Zhao et al. 2021), Anisomeles indica (NC_046781.1) (Zhao et al. 2021), Salvia przewalskii (NC_041091.1) (Du et al. 2019), Salvia miltiorrhiza (NC_020431.1) (Du et al. 2019), and Lithospermum erythrorhizon (NC_053783.1) (Park et al. 2020) selected as the outgroup.

Discussion and conclusions

This study presents the first complete sequencing and analysis of the chloroplast genomes of Lamium barbatum and Leucas ciliata, two Lamioideae species from different genera with distinct morphological features. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that Lamium barbatum is closely related to Lamium tenuifolium and Lamium album, consistent with previous findings (Park et al. 2019). Importantly, we identified a previously unknown close relationship between the two Leucas species. Additionally, five species from diverse Lamiaceae genera (Lagopsis supina, Phlomis fruticosa, Phlomoides rotata, Galeopsis bifida, and Anisomeles indica) were found to be genetically related to the studied species within a single branch. The SSR sequences identified here offer effective tools for plant variety identification, seed purity assessment, genetic relationship analysis, and molecular marker development. Complex SSR fragments, in particular, may serve as valuable genetic markers to accelerate the selection of superior varieties. The observed differences in morphology, chloroplast genome content, SSR sequences, and genetic relationships between these two species provide important resources for medicinal plant authentication, evolutionary studies, and germplasm selection.

Supplementary Material

Figure S4.png
Figure S3.jpg
TMDN_A_2582528_SM7640.jpg (115.8KB, jpg)
Figure S1.png
Table S.xlsx
Figure S2.jpg

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the team of Dr. Liuchang (Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) and Dr. Xuwenbo (China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences) for their support in developing the technological software. We extend our gratitude to Dr. Zhang F. Q., Miss Yu J. Y., and MA. Han Y., etc., affiliated to Northwest Plateau Biology Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for preparing the specimen samples.

Funding Statement

No funding was received.

Ethical approval

In accordance with the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Wild Plants Protection, Lamium barbatum and Leucas ciliata are not the key protected wild plants at the national level. The collection of samples adheres to the guidelines stipulated by national and international regulations.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The genome sequences supporting the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession numbers PV802395.1 and PV802396.1. The associated BioProject, Bio-Sample, and SRA numbers are PRJNA1276693, SAMN49081836 and SAMN49081837, and SRR33980865 and SRR33980864, respectively.

References

  1. Bendiksby M, Thorbek L, Scheen AC, Lindqvist C, Ryding O.. 2011. An updated phylogeny and classification of Lamiaceae subfamily Lamioideae. Taxon. 60(2):471–484. 10.1002/tax.602015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantino PD, Sanders RW.. 1986. Subfamilial classification of Labiatae. Syst Bot. 11(1):163–185. 10.2307/2418955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang M, Chen X, Chen S, Ma L.. 2014. Analysis of the diversity and geographical pattern of wild Lamiaceae species in China. Subtrop Plant Sci. 53(3):234–242. [Google Scholar]
  4. Du Q, et al. 2022. Complete chloroplast genomes of two medicinal Swertia species: the comparative evolutionary analysis of Swertia genus in the Gentianaceae family. Planta. 256(4):73. 10.1007/s00425-022-03987-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Du Y, Wang YY, Xiang CL, Yang MQ.. 2019. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Salvia przewalskii Maxim. (Lamiaceae), a substitute for Dan-Shen Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 4(1):981–982. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1581107 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gomez-Casati DF, Barchiesi J, Busi MV.. 2022. Mitochondria and chloroplasts function in microalgae energy production. PeerJ. 10:e14576. 10.7717/peerj.14576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gui J-S, Wei Q-H, Yang S-D.. 1991. Discussion on Leucas varieties in Yunnan. J Yunnan Coll Tradit Chin Med. 2:23–25. 10.19288/j.cnki.issn.1000-2723.1991.02.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guzman E, Molina J.. 2018. The predictive utility of the plant phylogeny in identifying sources of cardiovascular drugs. Pharm Biol. 56(1):154–164. 10.1080/13880209.2018.1444642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huaizhu L, et al. 2019. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Mentha canadensis (Labiatae), a traditional Chinese herbal medicine. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5(1):55–56. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1687031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huaizhu L, et al. 2020. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Thymus mongolicus (Labiatae), a special spice plant. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5(3):2597–2598. 10.1080/23802359.2020.1778573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang L, Yu H, Wang Z, Xu W.. 2024. CPStools: a package for analyzing chloroplast genome sequences. iMetaOmics. 1(2):e25. 10.1002/imo2.25 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jin JJ, et al. 2020. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21(1):241. 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuang K, et al. 2024. Research on phenolic acid components and their anti-inflammatory activity in Leucas ciliata. Chin J Tradit Chin Med. 49(11):2940–2946. 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20240218.201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Langmead B, Salzberg SL.. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9(4):357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li B, et al. 2016. A large-scale chloroplast phylogeny of the Lamiaceae sheds new light on its subfamilial classification. Sci Rep. 6(1):34343. 10.1038/srep34343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu S, et al. 2023. CPGView: a package for visualizing detailed chloroplast genome structures. Mol Ecol Resour. 23(3):694–704. 10.1111/1755-0998.13729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Park I, Yang S, Song JH, Moon BC.. 2020. Dissection for floral micromorphology and plastid genome of valuable medicinal borages Arnebia and Lithospermum (Boraginaceae). Front Plant Sci. 11:606463. 10.3389/fpls.2020.606463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Park KT, Shin J, Park S.. 2019. Complete chloroplast genome of Lamium takesimese Nakai (Lamiaceae): an endemic species in South Korea. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3216–3217. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1667899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tjendana Tjhin V, et al. 2024. Baseline data collections of lipopolysaccharide content in 414 herbal extracts and its role in innate immune activation. Sci Rep. 14(1):15394. 10.1038/s41598-024-66081-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang J, et al. 2024. Plant organellar genomes: much done, much more to do. Trends Plant Sci. 29(7):754–769. 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang Q, Luo S, Xu Y.. 2012. Study on the chemical composition of Leucas ciliata. Chin Herb Med. 43(1):27–31. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang Y, Wang H, Zhou B, Yue Z.. 2021. The complete chloroplast genomes of Lycopus lucidus and Agastache rugosa, two herbal species in tribe Mentheae of Lamiaceae family. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(1):89–90. 10.1080/23802359.2020.1847617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xiang CY, et al. 2023. Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. Imeta. 2(1):e87. 10.1002/imt2.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yuan L, et al. 2024. Comparative chloroplast genomes study of five officinal Ardisia species: unraveling interspecific diversity and evolutionary insights in Ardisia. Gene. 912:148349. 10.1016/j.gene.2024.148349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang Y, Tian L, Lu C.. 2023. Chloroplast gene expression: recent advances and perspectives. Plant Commun. 4(5):100611. 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao F, et al. 2021. An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics. BMC Biol. 19(1):2. 10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S4.png
Figure S3.jpg
TMDN_A_2582528_SM7640.jpg (115.8KB, jpg)
Figure S1.png
Table S.xlsx
Figure S2.jpg

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences supporting the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession numbers PV802395.1 and PV802396.1. The associated BioProject, Bio-Sample, and SRA numbers are PRJNA1276693, SAMN49081836 and SAMN49081837, and SRR33980865 and SRR33980864, respectively.


Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES