Skip to main content
Current Neuropharmacology logoLink to Current Neuropharmacology
. 2025 Mar 18;23(11):1423–1441. doi: 10.2174/011570159X360149250225041829

The Impact of Akkermansia muciniphila on Mouse Models of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Leila Khalili 1, Gwoncheol Park 1, Ravinder Nagpal 1, Pradeep Bhide 2, Gloria Salazar 1,*
PMCID: PMC12606656  PMID: 40108902

Abstract

Background

Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila), a bacterial species within the human gut microbiome, has shown beneficial effects on host health. Emerging research suggests that A. muciniphila also influences neurobehavioral domains through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This meta-analysis evaluates A. muciniphila’s impact on depression, anxiety, and stress in mouse models.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to March 2024, identifying 15 eligible studies.

Results

Supplementation with A. muciniphila, its outer membrane protein (Amuc_1100), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) alleviated anxiety, depressive-like behaviors, and enhanced memory in mice. Compared to controls, intervention groups exhibited reduced anxiety-like behaviors, including increased travel distance in the open-field test (OFT) and more time spent in the lightbox during the light-dark box (LDB) test and open arms in the elevated plus maze (EPM). Depression-like symptoms were reduced, with lower immobility time in the tail suspension and forced swim tests. Memory function also improved, and learning time was reduced in the Y-maze and Barnes circular maze tests. Serotonin levels increased significantly in the serum and hippocampus, while corticosterone levels decreased, though not significantly. The intervention reduced hippocampal and serum inflammatory markers (TNFα, IL1β, IL6) and altered gut microbiome composition, increasing Akkermansia, Roseburia, Caldicoprobacter, and Lachnospiraceae.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the health-promoting effects of A. muciniphila, one of the next-generation probiotics, in alleviating neuropsychiatric disorders. Given the high prevalence and clinical significance of depression, anxiety, and stress, further investigation into the therapeutic utility of A. muciniphila is warranted.

Keywords: Akkermansia muciniphila, mental health, mouse, depression, anxiety, stress, meta-analysis

1. INTRODUCTION

The gut microbiota, a diverse collection of commensal bacteria, parasites, fungi, archaea, and viruses, is essential for maintaining host health [1]. These microorganisms are integral to human physiology, metabolism, growth, immunity, and development [2] and have an active rather than a passive role in human health and disease [3]. A healthy microbiota (eubiosis) promotes host health by diverse mechanisms, including generating protective gut-derived metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)), maintaining the integrity of the gut barrier (e.g., increasing tight junction proteins), and reducing intestinal and systemic inflammation. In contrast, an unhealthy microbiota (dysbiosis) disrupts these protective mechanisms, promoting various diseases, including cardiometabolic diseases (e.g., obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis) [4]. This functional link between the gut microbiota and human health has transformed our understanding of disease development and has paved the way for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

A. muciniphila, a commensal bacterium residing in the mucus layer of the intestinal epithelium, has attracted considerable attention in recent years because of its positive effects on energy metabolism, glucose tolerance, and immune system function [5]. A. muciniphila has shown promise in managing various metabolic conditions, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, colitis, and age-related issues. Its capacity to restore the gut microbiota and preserve a healthy gut mucosal barrier underscores its significance in regulating immunity and mitigating inflammation [6-12]. A. muciniphila is typically found in healthy individuals and is upregulated by dietary patterns like the Mediterranean diet [13]. However, its levels can be reduced by age, unhealthy diets, and disease conditions [14]. Our recent meta-analysis on the effects of A. muciniphila supplementation in animal models of metabolic disorders indicates that both live and heat-killed forms of A. muciniphila, as well as its EVs and proteins, can improve lipid profiles, glucose metabolism, liver enzyme levels, gut and systemic inflammation, and body weight [15]. Thus, A. muciniphila is a potential probiotic for the management of inflammatory and metabolic disorders. Recent studies have also suggested an association between A. muciniphila and the management of neurological and psychiatric disorders symptoms, suggesting the involvement of A. muciniphila in the gut-brain axis communication via gut-derived metabolites [2].

Mental health disorders have become a considerable global health concern, affecting nearly 970 million people worldwide [16]. Conditions such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorders, and bipolar disorders can severely compromise individuals' daily functioning and quality of life and, in some cases, lead to suicide. These disorders also cause a significant economic burden to families and healthcare systems, as well as human life losses [17]. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these challenges, with quarantine measures, economic downturns, and increased unemployment contributing to a surge in mental health problems. It's anticipated that the pandemic's lasting impact on mental health, particularly in terms of anxiety, depression, and PTSD, will persist in the long term [18].

The role of the microbiota in improving mental health outcomes and the possible use of probiotics to treat the symptoms of these diseases have sparked great interest in recent years. Research in preclinical murine models has uncovered several mechanisms by which the gut microbiota can influence brain function and mental health, including the regulation of the vagus nerve tone, neuro-immune signaling, tryptophan metabolism, neuroendocrine function, and the synthesis of neuroactive compounds [19, 20]. Furthermore, the microbiota influences the activity of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate, which are essential for brain function [21]. Specific gut bacteria, such as Roseburia inulinivorans, Bacteroides uniformis, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Eubacterium rectale, stand out for their positive effects on mental health by producing SCFAs and modulating metabolic pathways [22]. Additionally, gut dysbiosis may contribute to the development and progression of mental disorders [21, 23].

Conventional treatments for mental disorders, such as pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and behavioral therapy, often encounter challenges like side effects and patient non-compliance [24, 25]. As a result, there is growing interest in alternative approaches such as acupuncture, meditation, and natural remedies [24]. Natural dietary products, including probiotics, have emerged as promising interventions for managing neuropsychiatric disorders by virtue of their potential to influence the gut microbiota [26]. Moreover, diets rich in vegetables, fruits, and fiber have been linked to improved mental health outcomes, while tryptophan-rich diets have shown associations with reduced depression and enhanced cognition [19, 27, 28].

This meta-analysis aims to provide an overview of the role of A. muciniphila in managing neurobehavioral disorders in mouse models of depression, anxiety, and stress. The findings revealed significant beneficial effects of A. muciniphila in neurobehavioral disorders.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present research was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and was registered in advance in PROSPERO (CRD42024550582).

2.1. Search Strategy

Relevant studies were identified through a search of publications available for retrieval until March 2024 in databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, and Web of Science, as we previously reported [15]. The search’s objective was to find studies examining A. muciniphila’s effects on mental health in mouse models of psychiatric disorders. The search was conducted using the following terms: (Akkermansia OR Akkermansia muciniphila OR A. muciniphila OR Akk) AND (Mental disorder OR Depression OR Anxiety OR Stress) AND (Mouse OR Mice). Only studies published in English were included in the review.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Studies were included if 1) they were conducted in mice, 2) they assessed mental disorders, and 3) they supplemented animals with any form of A. muciniphila (live, heat-killed, EVs or protein extracts). Conversely, studies were excluded if they provided insufficient information on the experimental design and mental health outcomes. Other excluded studies were narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and articles lacking original research.

2.3. Characteristics of Included Studies

The initial search yielded 7,481 articles (ranging from 2000 to 2024). After assessing the articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and removing reviews, books, clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses, 30 articles were considered for inclusion. Of these, only 18 articles provided original research investigating the effects of A. muciniphila on mental health in mouse models of mental disorders. Upon further review of titles and abstracts, 3 studies with insufficient data were excluded, leaving 15 studies presenting sufficient information for data extraction (Fig. 1).

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

The PRISMA flow diagram shows the search strategy used in this study. Studies of interest were located through extensive searches in databases such as Science Direct, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science until March 2024. Studies investigating A. muciniphila’s effect on mental health in mouse models of depression, anxiety, and stress were considered for inclusion.

Publication bias was assessed using the Egger and Begg tests, showing little to no bias, except for the time in the lightbox (Table S1). The observed bias could result from the limited studies measuring this outcome (two studies).

Table S2 shows the studies’ characteristics, including the mouse sex and age, the A. muciniphila strain and treatment conditions, and outcomes. Fourteen studies used C57BL/6 mice, and one used the APP/PS1 (Alzheimer's disease model). Regarding gender, most of the studies used males (12 studies), two were conducted in females [29, 30], and only one used both sexes [31]. The age of the animals at the beginning of the study ranged between 5 and 12 weeks. One study reported the weight but not the age of the mice [32], and one used juvenile mice (P21) [33].

Regarding mental health outcomes, anxiety and depression phenotypes were induced in a variety of experimental models, including depression induced by alcohol and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment (mALSP) [29], antibiotic-induced anxiety and depression [34], chronic restraint stress (CRS) depression [32, 33], healthy mice [34, 35], chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) [36, 37], learning and memory impairment in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity [38], traumatic brain injury (TBI) [39], National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) model [32], chronic alcohol via gavage [32], depressive-like behavior induced by CUMS [32], sleep-deprived [40], HFD-induced metabolic disorders [30], neonatal maternal separation (NMS) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [31], Citrobacter rodentium infection, post-infectious-IBD model [31], Alzheimer’s disease [41], and antibiotic-treated [42] models.

Regarding treatment with A. muciniphila, eight of the included studies utilized A. muciniphila ATCC® BAA-835™ strain, one used the DMS 22959 strain [32], one used a Chinese strain [41], and five did not report the strain of A. muciniphila used [29, 32, 34, 36, 39]. Only one study used pasteurized A. muciniphila; three studies used the membrane protein Amuc_1100; two studies used EVs and the rest of the included studies used live A. muciniphila.

Behavioral outcomes were measured for anxiety, depression, and learning. Anxiety was measured using the following tests: the light-dark box (LDB), open field test (OFT), and the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. For the OFT, most of the studies measured the total distance traveled. Some studies also measured the number of entries into the center, the time spent in the center, and the time spent in the periphery of the box. For the LDB test, outcomes were measured for time spent in the light chamber and the number of entries into the lightbox. For the EPM test, outcomes were measured for time spent in the open arms and the frequency of entry into the open arms. One study also used the hole board test to assess anxiety and stress responses to an unfamiliar environment [31]. Depression-like behavior was assessed based on the immobility time in assays of learned helplessness, such as the tail suspension test (TST) and the forced swim test (FST). Two studies also measured hedonic behaviors using a sucrose preference test [30, 43].

Memory outcomes were measured using the Y-maze for working memory [30, 31], novel object recognition (NOR) [31, 40], contextual fear-conditioning test, and Barnes circular maze test [38]. The novel location recognition (NLR) test was used in only one study [31]. Moreover learning was measured by Y-maze [41] and Barnes circular maze [38] tests.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Data analysis was performed as previously reported [15] using STATA18 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) by following PRISMA guidelines recommended for systematic reviews and meta-analyses [44]. We used a restricted maximum likelihood method with a random-effects model [45] for the meta-analysis. The random-effects model was chosen to account for the possibility of missing, unidentified, or unregistered studies. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's I-squared, Q tests, and Tau-squared with substantial heterogeneity defined as an I-squared value greater than 75% [46]. The combined effect size of each study was reported using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval. (CI). Furthermore, funnel plots, as well as Egger's and Begg's tests, were used to assess publication bias [47, 48]. Figs. (1-8) were generated using STATA18.

Fig. (8).

Fig. (8)

Effect of A. muciniphila on tight junction proteins expression in the gut. Forest plot of individual SMD of gut Ocl and claudin 1 expression in mice receiving A. muciniphila. The white diamond indicates a non-statistical difference.

3. RESULTS

3.1. A. muciniphila Alleviates Anxiety-like Behavior

As we previously reported [15], the data are presented using the common SMD and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the behavioral tests, based on a random-effects model, as shown in Table S3. The data show that A. muciniphila supplementation significantly increases the total travel distance in the OFT, time spent and entries into the lightbox in the LDB test, and time spent and entries in the open arm in the EPM test (Fig. 2). Other assessments for the OFT measured in some studies also showed significant alleviation of anxiety-like behavior. For example, there was a reduction in the time in which mice were at the periphery [29] and an increase in the entries and time spent at the center of the field in the OFT [34, 41].

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Effect of A. muciniphila on anxiety. Forest plot of individual SMD of anxiety tests including total travel distance in the OFT, time spent in light box and number of entries into the lightbox in the LDB test, and time and entries in the open arm in EPM tests of mice receiving A. muciniphila. The green diamond represents p < 0.05.

Sub-group analysis of anxiety tests revealed that the effect of Amuc-1100 on improving OFT outcome was stronger than that of live bacteria (Fig. S1). Moreover, interventions with both live and non-live interventions (Amuc_1100 and EVs) significantly improved lightbox entries in the LDB test (Fig. S2A), though only non-live interventions were significantly effective in increasing the time spent in the lightbox (Fig. S2B). However, it should be noted that only one study measured time spent in the lightbox. Sub-group analysis for time spent in the open arms of the EPM showed significant effectiveness of both live and non-live interventions (Fig. S3). All studies measuring entries into the open arms (EPM) used non-live interventions (Amuc_1100 and pasteurized bacteria). More studies are needed to conclude that live bacteria are equally effective for these measures.

3.2. A. muciniphila Improves Depression-like Behavior

The immobility time observed in the TST and FST was reduced significantly by A. muciniphila supplementation (Fig. 3). The sucrose preference test was used in only two studies [30, 43], showing non-significant improvement in sucrose intake in the A. muciniphila groups.

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Effect of A. muciniphila on depression symptoms. Forest plot of individual SMD of depression tests including tail-suspension test (TST), forced swim test (FST), and sucrose preference test in mice receiving A. muciniphila. The green diamond represents p < 0.05, and the white diamond represents non-statistical significance.

Sub-group analysis showed that all interventions (live and non-live) improved TST immobility time (Fig. S4A), but only the non-live interventions significantly improved immobility time in the FST (Fig. S4B).

3.3. A. muciniphila Improves Cognition Function and Memory

Memory was evaluated by combining the measurements for the time spent exploring a novel object in the NOR test, spontaneous alternations in the Y-maze test, and percent of freezing time in the contextual fear-conditioning test. Learning was assessed using the Y-maze and Barnes circular maze tests by measuring the time spent learning the task (Fig. 4). A. muciniphila supplementation significantly improved memory and learning outcomes of the combined tests.

Fig. (4).

Fig. (4)

A. muciniphila improved memory and learning outcomes. The forest plot shows the standardized mean difference (SMD) for memory, measured by the NOR and Y-maze tests, and learning, assessed using the Y-maze and Barnes circular maze tests, in mice receiving A. muciniphila. The green diamond indicates p < 0.05.

Sub-group analysis of memory tests showed that all interventions (live and non-live) improved memory in mice (Fig. S5). All studies measuring learning outcomes used live bacteria; thus, no sub-group analysis was performed for this outcome.

3.4. A. muciniphila Improves Serotonin Levels in the Hippocampus, Serum, and Gut

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) is a neurotransmitter implicated in regulating mood, anxiety, memory, as well as gastrointestinal function [49]. Serotonin levels in the serum, hippocampus (HIPP), and gut were evaluated in mouse models of stress, anxiety, and depression-like behavior following A. muciniphila administration. Serotonin levels were elevated significantly in the serum and the HIPP, showing an upward trend (P = 0.08) in the gut of A. muciniphila-treated mice (Fig. 5). Similarly, the serum level of corticosterone, a stress hormone, was reduced, but the reduction did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.08).

Fig. (5).

Fig. (5)

A. muciniphila regulates serotonin and corticosterone levels. Forest plot of individual SMD of serotonin levels in serum, HIPP and gut, and serum corticosterone in mice receiving A. muciniphila. The green diamond represents p < 0.05, and the white diamond non-statistical difference.

Sub-group analysis showed that all interventions (live and non-live) improved serum and HIPP serotonin levels (Figs. S6A and C). Neither live nor non-live interventions were effective in improving serum corticosterone and gut serotonin levels (Figs. S6B and D).

3.5. A. muciniphila Influences Signaling Molecules Associated with Neurotransmitter Function in the Hippocampus, Serum, and Gut

A. muciniphila’s effects on factors regulating neuronal plasticity, like brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [50] were analyzed in several of the included studies. BDNF regulates serotonin levels and synaptic transmission by regulating serotonin transporter (SERT) expression [51]. Corticosterone, the major glucocorticoid expressed in mice, binds to glucocorticoid receptors (GR) to induce a stress response in the brain. Inflammatory responses induced by stress conditions negatively affect tryptophan metabolism, which is involved in serotonin synthesis. In physiologic conditions, serotonin is synthesized from tryptophan via tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1). Inflammation increases tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), an enzyme that diverts tryptophan into kynurenine synthesis, reducing serotonin expression and causing depression-like symptoms. Furthermore, the ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1) was used as a marker of microglia activation, and the diamine oxidase (DAO), an enzyme expressed in the intestinal epithelium, was used as a marker of intestinal permeability.

Although not all the included studies measured the expression of all these markers, A. muciniphila supplementation showed improvement in several of them, including upregulation of BDNF and downregulation of GR in the HIPP (Fig. 6). cAMP-responsive element-binding protein1 (CREB1), another regulator of neuronal plasticity, showed an upward trend close to significance (P = 0.05) in the HIPP. DAO was reduced in the serum, and TPH1 was upregulated in the gut by A. muciniphila, trends that did not reach statistically significant.

Fig. (6).

Fig. (6)

Effect of A. muciniphila on neurotransmitter-related factors in the hippocampus, serum, and gut. Forest plot of individual SMD of HIPP BDNF, GR, CREB1, and serum DAO, and gut TPH1 in mice receiving A. muciniphila. The green diamond represents p < 0.05, and the white diamond non-statistical difference.

Sub-group analysis indicated that all interventions (live and non-live) improved BDNF and GR levels in the HIPP (Figs. S7A and B); however, only non-live interventions significantly improved gut TPH1 levels (Fig. S7C). All the studies measuring hippocampus CREB1 used Amuc-1100, and all the studies measuring serum DAO used live bacteria.

3.6. A. muciniphila Alleviates Inflammation in the Hippocampus, Serum, and Gut

Consistent with improvements in serotonin and its regulatory network, A. muciniphila supplementation significantly decreased HIPP (Fig. 7A) and serum (Fig. 7B) levels of inflammatory markers, including TNFα, IL1β, IL6, and Iba1. However, the reductions in TNFα and Iba1 levels were insignificant (P = 0.07 and P = 0.08, respectively). The level of serum IL1β was measured only in two studies that showed a significant reduction in its level.

Fig. (7).

Fig. (7)

Effect of A. muciniphila on inflammation. Forest plot of individual SMD of the hippocampus (A) and serum (B) inflammatory markers in mice receiving A. muciniphila. The green diamond represents p < 0.05, and the white diamond non-statistical difference.

Sub-group analysis showed that all A. muciniphila interventions (live and non-live) reduced IL1β and IL6 levels in the HIPP; however, only non-live interventions could significantly reduce HIPP TNFα levels (Figs. S8A-C). There were not enough studies to perform a sub-group analysis for the inflammatory markers in the serum.

3.7. A. muciniphila Influences Tight-junction Protein Expression in the Gut

Reductions in serum DAO, a marker of intestinal permeability, suggest that A. muciniphila may improve intestinal permeability. This was evaluated by measuring the mRNA expression of tight junction proteins in the gut. Surprisingly, A. muciniphila showed no effect on occludin (Ocl) expression and reduced claudin 1, which did not reach significance (P = 0.16) (Fig. 8). However, the sub-group analysis revealed that live A. muciniphila significantly increased Ocl, while the non-live interventions reduced claudin 1 (Figs. S9A and B).

3.8. A. muciniphila and Gut Microbiome

A. muciniphila's role in mental health is largely mediated through the microbiome-gut-brain axis by facilitating neurotransmitter production in the gut and modulating central nervous system signals. Due to the ecological dynamics within the gut microbiome, administering specific bacteria induces significant shifts in microbial composition and interactions, which in turn influences signaling via the gut-brain axis. Therefore, understanding the changes in the overall gut microbiome following A. muciniphila intervention and deciphering the crosstalk between the altered microbiome and the host is crucial to uncovering the mechanisms underlying A. muciniphila's effects on mental health. To assess these changes, we analyzed three studies in which microbiome data was available, as we previously reported [15]. Two studies focused on depressive disorders and one on other psychiatric disorders, all utilizing live bacterium administration (Table 1).

Table 1.

Studies with publicly available data for microbiome analysis.

Study Disease Treatment No. of Samples
Guo et al. [29] Depressive disorders Live Akkermansia CTL (n=4), AKK (n=4)
Chen et al. [32] Psychological disorder Live Akkermansia CTL (n=9), AKK (n=9)
Ding et al. [33] Depressive-like behavior Live Akkermansia CTL (n=5), AKK (n=5)

Note: Control (CTL): 18 samples, Akkermansia (AKK) 18 samples.

Microbial diversity was evaluated using Shannon and Chao1 metrics. Although there were no significant differences between controls (CTL) and A. muciniphila-administrated (AKK) groups, the Chao1 diversity of the AKK group was marginally lower than that of the CTL group, suggesting a slight reduction in richness in the AKK group (Fig. 9A). Subsequently, we compared the composition of microbes at the phylum and genus levels between controls and AKK groups. At the phylum level, three major phyla-Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Proteobacteria-accounted for more than 80% of the total bacterial composition in both the CTL and AKK groups. Among them, Verrucomicrobiota, to which Akkermansia belongs, and Bacteroidota were more abundant in the AKK group, while Proteobacteria was significantly higher in the CTL group (Fig. 9B). Specifically, Akkermansia, Roseburia, Caldicoprobacter, and Lachnospiraceae were significantly increased in the AKK mice. In contrast, various genera within the Proteobacteria phylum, including Klebsiella, Morganella, Providencia, Dokdonella, Luteimonas, Stenotrophomonas, Photobacterium, and Lysobacter, were enriched in the CTL mice. Additionally, Streptomyces and Acidimicrobiia, belonging to Actinobacteria, were more abundant in the CTL mice (Figs. 9C, D).

Fig. (9).

Fig. (9)

A. muciniphila remodels the microbiome. The data was analyzed for microbial alpha diversity, including Shannon and Chao1 (A) and microbiome composition at the phylum (B) and genus (C) levels. Differential abundance analysis results with LEfSe (LDA>2.0, P-value < 0.05) (D). Significantly correlated genus with Akkermansia (Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) > 0.6) (E). Distinct differences between genera in CTL (F) and AKK (G) groups were observed in correlational networks. Each node in (F and G) represents one genus, and only significant links between genera are shown (Spearman coefficient (ρ) > 0.75, Benjamini-Hochberg corrected P-value < 0.05). The figures were generated using Python (version 3.8.16) package.

Next, correlational and network analyses were conducted to explore possible functional associations between A. muciniphila and other microbes and to evaluate how A. muciniphila treatment alters the microbial ecological niche in the gut (Figs. 9E-G). Correlational analysis revealed that A. muciniphila positively correlated with several SCFA-producing bacteria, including Butyricimonas, Eubacterium, Lachnospiraceae, and Faecalitalea, as well as with Flavonifractor, a flavonoid-degrading bacterium. Conversely, Candidatus Saccharimonas, Odoribacter, and Lactobacillus negatively correlated with A. muciniphila (Fig. 9E). Network analysis, performed separately for the CTL and AKK groups, revealed distinct microbial associations following A. muciniphila administration. Interestingly, A. muciniphila formed more significant networks with other microbes in the CTL group than in the AKK group. In the CTL group, A. muciniphila exhibited co-occurrence associations with Romboutsia, Bacteroides, and Enterococcus, and mutually exclusive associations with an uncultured genus in the Peptococcaceae family, Candidatus Saccharimonas, Lactobacillus, and Enterorhabdus. In contrast, in the AKK group, A. muciniphila demonstrated positive correlations with Coriobacteriaceae UCG-002, Faecalitalea, and Flavonifractor. Notably, Faecalitalea and Flavonifractor, which showed mutually exclusive associations with Candidatus Saccharimonas in the CTL group, were potentially suppressed by Candidatus Saccharimonas but were replenished with the help of A. muciniphila in the AKK group (Figs. 9F, G).

4. DISCUSSION

The findings of this meta-analysis provide compelling evidence for the positive impact of A. muciniphila, its outer membrane protein (Amuc_1100), and EVs on behavioral outcomes in mouse models of depression, anxiety, and stress. The results show that A. muciniphila produced significant improvements in several conditions, including alcohol abuse, antibiotic-induced anxiety and depression, chronic stress, HFD-induced memory impairment, TBI, sleep deprivation, neonatal maternal separation, IBD, and Alzheimer’s disease. Fig. (10) summarizes the behavioral outcomes assessed in the included studies and proposed mechanisms by which A. muciniphila improves brain function. A. muciniphila supplementation ameliorated anxiety-like symptoms measured in the OFT, LDB, and EPM tests and improved memory, which was evaluated using the NOR, Y-maze, and Barnes circular maze tests. It also reduced depression-like behavior by reducing the freezing time in the TST and FST tests. Several mechanisms by which A. muciniphila improved these outcomes were explored, which implicated factors such as the expression of serotonin and neuronal plasticity-related molecules, inflammation, intestinal epithelial permeability, and microbiome composition.

Fig. (10).

Fig. (10)

Model for the proposed mechanism by which A. muciniphila improved behavioral outcomes. Consumption of A. muciniphila and its by-products, such as EVs and Amuc-1100, can lead to improvements in neuropsychiatric function. A. muciniphila increases the activity of Tph1 in the gut, leading to an increase in serotonin levels, which plays a role in improving gastrointestinal (GI) function. Additionally, A. muciniphila affects the levels of gut-tight junction proteins and enhances the integrity of the gut epithelium, thereby preventing the access of toxic molecules (e.g., LPS) to blood circulation. Furthermore, A. muciniphila increases the abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria in the gut. By reducing LPS levels and increasing SCFAs in circulation, A. muciniphila exerts an anti-inflammatory effect. Inhibiting inflammatory markers in circulation can positively affect neural function by inhibiting neuroinflammation. In the hippocampus, A. muciniphila increases Tph2 activity, leading to elevated serotonin levels that reduce behavioral manifestations of anxiety and depression. Additionally, by reducing NLRP3 activity in the hippocampus, A. muciniphila reduces neuroinflammation, thereby improving memory. Red and blue arrowheads indicate increased and decreased expression, respectively. The figure was created by BioRender.

A. muciniphila elevated serotonin levels in the hippocampus, serum, and gut (Fig. 10). In the gut, it increased tight junction gene expression, while in circulation, it reduced biomarkers of inflammation (TNFα, IL1β, and IL6) and intestinal permeability (LPS and DAO) while increasing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 and the SCFAs acetate and butanoic acid. In the brain, reduced inflammation was associated with reduced expression of NLRP3, leading to IL1β downregulation. The upregulation of BDNF may explain improved memory outcomes, while elevated serotonin may explain the reduction in symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Serotonin is produced in the gut (Fig. 11A) and the brain (Fig. 11B). Most of the serotonin in the body is found in the gut, being secreted into circulation by enterochromaffin cells (ECs) in the intestinal epithelium. This serotonin pool regulates gastrointestinal function and contributes to serum serotonin (Fig. 11A). At the protein level, serotonin is regulated by protein synthesis and degradation. Tryptophan is a precursor in two closely related metabolic pathways: serotonin synthesis and the kynurenine pathway, which are regulated by the rate-limiting enzymes TPH1 (TPH1 in the gut and TPH2 in neurons) and IDO, respectively [52]. Serotonin degradation is mediated by the monoamine oxidase (MAO), producing metabolites that are excreted in the urine. Serotonin is transported through the serotonin transporter SERT, which is encoded by the Slc6a4 gene, representing the main mechanism for serotonin reuptake. Lastly, serotonin acts by binding to G-protein-couple serotonin transporters (Htrs). Regarding these genes, several studies showed increased serotonin and Tph1 gene expression in the gut, which is crucial for serotonin biosynthesis [35, 53]. Other genes were also examined; however, they were only examined in one study. For example, Yaghoubfar et al. [35] saw increased colonic expression of Slc6a4 and Htr4 and reduced MAO expression (Fig. 11A).

Fig. (11).

Fig. (11)

Model for the proposed mechanism by which A. muciniphila regulates intestinal and brain function. A. muciniphila increases the number of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria by degrading mucin and providing energy for these bacteria. The produced SCFAs can be absorbed and transported to the brain, where they reduce microglia phagocytic activity by inhibiting Iba1 and CD68 in the hippocampus. Additionally, A. muciniphila influences the expression of gut-tight junction proteins, preventing the leakage of LPS and other toxic molecules into the circulation, thereby controlling systemic inflammation. EVs produced by A. muciniphila can pass through the gut epithelium, enter circulation, and cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) (A). In the hippocampus, these EVs inhibit C1q, a marker of microglial pruning and synapse engulfment, as well as phagocytosis, inflammation, Iba1, and astrocyte activity (B). The figure was created by BioRender.

Slc6a4 is expressed in intestinal epithelial cells and mediates the reuptake of serotonin. Once inside the cells, serotonin can be degraded by the enzyme MAO. Serotonin transporters, such as Htr4, are found in gut serotonergic neurons, which mediate gut motility [54]. This study also used Caco-2 cells to assess serotonergic genes. A. muciniphila and EVs increased Slc6a4 expression, and only EVs upregulated serotonin and TPH1 in CaCo2 cells. The enzyme DAO, important for metabolizing histamine and maintaining intestinal barrier integrity, shows elevated levels when the barrier is compromised [41], but treatment with A. muciniphila restores barrier function.

A. muciniphila increased serotonin levels in the brain (Fig. 11B). This effect was associated with reduced inflammatory markers, including TNFα, IL1β and IL6. Furthermore, A. muciniphila can inhibit stress-induced microglial overactivation, reduce Iba1 expression, and prevent synaptic damage in the hippocampus [40, 55]. As with the gut, other markers were also measured in the brain, but only in one study. For example, Li et al. [40] reported that sleep deprivation upregulated C1q, a marker of microglia pruning and synapse engulfment, and CD68, a lysosomal marker associated with phagocytic activity. Along with the upregulation of Iba1 observed in this study, these findings indicate that sleep deprivation profoundly impairs microglial function. However, all these markers were reduced following A. muciniphila intervention.

Beyond its effects on serotonin levels, A. muciniphila also affected other key molecules in the HIPP and serum crucial for neural function. BDNF is a critical growth factor involved in neural development, regeneration, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis, particularly in brain regions like the HIPP, which are linked to mood disorders. Reduced BDNF is associated with depression, while increased levels are necessary for antidepressant effects [56, 57]. A. muciniphila has been shown to elevate BDNF mRNA expression in the HIPP, potentially improving neuronal connectivity and alleviating depression [2, 33]. Additionally, GRs in the HIPP are activated by stress-induced glucocorticoids, leading to negative effects such as impaired neurogenesis, which can contribute to depression; however, treatment with Amuc_1100 reduces GR levels in chronic stress models [36]. CREB1, a transcription factor regulating depression-related genes, is influenced by stress and inflammatory responses [58-61], with Amuc_1100Δ80 potentially modulating the 5-HTR1A-CREB-BDNF pathway via toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) interactions [36].

Li et al. [40] also showed that sleep deprivation reduced the expression of synaptic proteins, including the vesicular glutamate transporter (Vglut1), the postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95), a scaffolding protein in excitatory neurons, and synaptophysin (SYP), an integral protein of presynaptic vesicles. The level of these proteins was also restored by A. muciniphila, suggesting that the intervention prevented synapse loss due to sleep deprivation. Interestingly, this study also measured SCFAs, finding that acetate and butanoic acid were reduced by sleep deprivation and restored by A. muciniphila. Furthermore, treatment of sleep-deprived mice with acetate and butanoic acid reduced Iba and CD68 in microglia and increased Vglut1 and PSD-95SYP in the HIPP of mice. Regarding behavior, a positive correlation was found between acetate and butanoic acid levels and exploration time in the NOR test.

Similarly, Yang, et al. [38] also explored mechanisms that were not measured in the other studies. The authors used HFD (60%kcal of fat) to induce cognitive impairment in young mice. HFD reduced the amplitude of the miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC), showing no effects on the frequency or amplitude of the miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current (mIPSC) in hippocampal CA1 neurons. HFD also altered long-term potentiation (LTP) in the HIPP, reduced marker of proliferation, neuronal dendrite length in the dentate gyrus, and expression of the AMPAR receptor GLuA1 and GluA2. In the gut, HFD promoted leaky gut and endotoxemia. A. muciniphila restored the levels of these molecules, improving neuronal plasticity and cognitive impairment. The authors further demonstrated that LPS injection causes microglia activation, neuroinflammation in the HIPP, and cognitive impairment. Blockade of TLR4 receptor reduced LPS-induced effects. Regarding BDNF signaling, Sun et al. [34] saw an increase in tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), a receptor tyrosine kinase that binds BDNF, and the downstream target c-Fos in the HIPP with both A. muciniphila and Amuc_1100. The intervention also restored astrocyte activation, measured by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).

Most of the sub-group analyses showed significant effects of both live and non-live interventions; however, some factors such as time in lightbox (anxiety test), FST (depression test), serum and hippocampus serotonin level, hippocampus GR level, and hippocampus TNFα level were significantly affected by non-live interventions.

Our findings indicate a significant effect of A. muciniphila on reducing biomarkers of inflammation in both serum and HIPP. The significant decrease in neuroinflammatory markers, including TNFα, IL1β, and IL6 in the HIPP, highlights another potential pathway through which A. muciniphila exerts its effects. Chronic neuroinflammation has been associated with the pathophysiology of depression and anxiety [62-64], and reducing inflammation in the brain may help alleviate these conditions. Haapakoski et al. [65] found significant associations between depression and increased levels of peripheral inflammatory markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL6. Likewise, Su et al. [66] identified a connection between interferon-α (IFNα) in the brain parenchyma and the onset of depression. Moreover, in mouse models displaying depressive-like behaviors, elevated expression of genes related to inflammation and injury repair was noted in the HIPP [67]. A. muciniphila downregulates pro-inflammatory pathways in the central nervous system (CNS) and the bloodstream, notably by suppressing systemic inflammatory biomarkers, including IL6 [68]. Overproduction of IL6 can reduce neurogenesis and impair neurotransmission in brain regions such as the HIPP and prefrontal cortex, both of which are crucial for cognitive function. Zhu et al. [68] showed that A. muciniphila treatment significantly downregulated the expression of genes involved in the T helper (Th17) cell differentiation induced by the IL6 pathway. Moreover, by suppressing Th17 cell activity and diminishing microglial hyperactivity in the brain, A. muciniphila lowers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, improving cognitive function. Both A. muciniphila and its protein Amuc_1100 effectively suppress the recruitment and activation of CD16/32+ M1 macrophages by decreasing the number of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes [69]. M1 macrophages are known for their rapid inflammatory response to infections and tissue damage, so reducing their numbers can help mitigate inflammatory symptoms throughout the body [70, 71]. Chen et al. [39] found that administering A. muciniphila orally led to decreased microglia activation and Nlrp3 inflammasome activity in the brain, which improved outcomes related to neuroinflammation and nerve injury following TBI. Neuroinflammation impairs neurogenesis in the HIPP, negatively impacting cognition and memory, resulting in symptoms such as impaired working memory, inattention, and heightened negative cognitive biases [72, 73]. Therefore, the improvement in memory status may partly result from the positive effects of A. muciniphila on neuroinflammation.

The analysis of the data related to gut barrier function showed a non-significant effect of A. muciniphila on tight junction protein expression when all studies were combined. However, sub-group analysis shows that improvement in these markers depends on the intervention (live vs. non-live bacterium). The overall non-significant results might stem from the limited number of included studies. Our recent meta-analysis on cardiometabolic outcomes found that A. muciniphila supplementation significantly improved tight junction protein expression in the gut [15]. Improved gut barrier function is significant to neuropsychiatric disorders because disruption of this barrier is linked to anxiety, depression, and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In fact, A. muciniphila supplementation can significantly increase the mucus layer thickness by increasing mucin 2 expression and the number of goblet cells [32]. As this bacterium resides in the mucus layer, it can activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to repair and maintain the gut mucosal barrier [74]. Additionally, Amuc_1100 activates TLR2-mediated signaling pathways, increasing the expression of tight junction proteins [9]. Similarly, administration of EVs increased Ocl expression, improving gut barrier function [75].

The microbiome analyses revealed a strong correlation between A. muciniphila and SCFA-producing bacteria. A. muciniphila has been shown to enhance intestinal homeostasis by promoting intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development following mucin degradation [76, 77]. Mucin degradation by A. muciniphila has been found to increase the availability of health-promoting oligosaccharides, including O-linked glycans and SCFAs, within the gut [78]. This alters the gut microbial niches and modulates the abundance of specific microbes that consume and utilize these metabolic products for their metabolism [79]. Studies have demonstrated that mucin-derived O-linked glycans increase the intestinal population of butyrate-producing bacteria while elevating the levels of butyrate and acetate in the cecum of mice [79]. One such butyrate-producing bacterium, Faecalitalea, showed a positive correlation with A. muciniphila in our analysis [80]. In prior research, Faecalitalea showed a negative correlation with brain aging factors [81] and exerted an indirect mediating effect on impulsivity, reducing impulsivity in methamphetamine abusers with higher Faecalitalzea abundance [82]. Although direct evidence linking Faecalitalea to brain function and mental health is limited, its role in producing butyrate—a compound known for its neuroprotective functions and contribution to brain homeostasis—suggests that Faecalitalea may be associated with the positive effects of A. muciniphila on mental health through its metabolic products [83].

The capacity of A. muciniphila to increase butyrate can have several consequences for key physiological processes in mood and anxiety conditions. First, butyrate inhibits the nuclear translocation of GRα, preventing the effects of stress and circadian cortisol/corticosteroids [84], including upregulation of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), which, like IDO, converts tryptophan to kynurenine [85]. Second, butyrate regulates epigenetic modifications by inhibiting the activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs) [86]. HDACs regulate excitatory amino acid transporters, like excitatory amino acid transporter (EEAAT) 2 [87], that show alterations in mood/anxiety disorders [88]. Third, butyrate can promote mitochondrial function, at least in part, by activation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex implicated in melatonin synthesis [89]. Fourth, butyrate is an important metabolic substrate not only for intestinal epithelial cells but also for astrocytes [90], with recent work indicating the important role of astrocytes in the pathophysiology of depression via the mitochondrial melatonergic pathway [91].

Another bacterium associated with A. muciniphila is Flavonifractor, which has been found to exhibit ambivalent health effects. While oral administration of Flavonifractor has been shown to attenuate inflammatory responses and play a protective role in cardiovascular health [92, 93], a high prevalence of this bacterium has been observed in affective disorders, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder [94-96]. Most studies reporting negative effects of Flavonifractor attribute these effects to degradation of beneficial flavonoids during metabolism, which may be the primary reason for its detrimental impact. However, Flavonifractor is also an SCFA producer, including propionate and valerate [97]. Considering that flavonoids have been found to enhance the growth of Proteobacteria in the gut in some studies [98], the reduction in Proteobacteria by A. muciniphila may possibly be due to decreased flavonoid levels resulting from increased Flavonifractor activity. Nevertheless, further studies would be needed to validate and elucidate the specific role of Flavonifractor in brain function.

In summary, the findings of this study showed that consumption of A. muciniphila could ameliorate behavioral symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. A. muciniphila interventions (live, heat-killed, Amuc_1100, and EVs) alleviate symptoms of neuropsychiatric disorders through several mechanisms, including reduced gut, systemic, and brain inflammation, gut microbiota remodeling, and improvement of the gut mucosal barrier. The observed effects on neurobehavioral outcomes and biochemical markers suggest that A. muciniphila could be developed as a novel therapeutic intervention for neuropsychiatric disorders. Additionally, the observed reduced serum cortisol levels by A. muciniphila indicate a modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which is involved in stress responses. Dysregulation of this system is often implicated in anxiety and depressive disorders. The attenuation of cortisol levels suggests that A. muciniphila may help normalize the stress response, potentially offering a protective effect against stress-related disorders.

5. LIMITATIONS

This meta-analysis has several limitations, including the heterogeneity in study designs. For example, differences in mouse strains, models of induced stress or depression, dosages, and duration of A. muciniphila administration may introduce variability in the outcomes. Additionally, the exclusive focus on preclinical models limits the generalizability of the findings to human populations. While animal models provide valuable insights into biological mechanisms, they do not fully replicate the complexity of human neuropsychiatric conditions. Furthermore, the relatively small number of included studies may limit the statistical power of the analysis, particularly for detecting small effect sizes or non-significant trends. Future meta-analyses with a larger pool of studies and more consistent methodologies would strengthen the evidence base.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis provide strong preliminary evidence that A. muciniphila can ameliorate behavioral symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, and stress in mouse models, likely through modulation of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, serotonergic pathways, HPA axis regulation, and reduction of neuroinflammation. These findings suggest that A. muciniphila could serve as a novel therapeutic intervention for mental health disorders, offering a potential alternative to traditional pharmacological treatments. The prospect of using probiotics to modulate mental health represents an exciting frontier in neuroscience and microbiome research, with significant implications for developing new, biologically based therapies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ASD

Autism Spectrum Disorders

BDNF

Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor

CRP

C-reactive Protein

CNS

Central Nervous System

CSF

Cerebrospinal Fluid

CRS

Chronic Restraint Stress

CUMS

Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress

DAO

Diamine Oxidase

EPM

Elevated Plus Maze

FST

Forced Swim Test

HFD

High-fat Diet

IBD

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

NMS

Neonatal Maternal Separation

OFT

Open Field Test

PTSD

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

SCFAs

Short-chain Fatty Acid

TST

Tail Suspension Test

TBI

Traumatic Brain Injury

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: Conceptualization, G.S., L.K., G.P. B.P., and R.N.; methodology, L.K. and G.P.; software, L.K. and G.P.; validation, L.K. and G.P.; formal analysis, G.S., L.K., G.P., B.P., and R.N; investigation, G.S., L.K., G.P., B.P., and R.N.; resources, G.S.; data curation, L.K. and G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K. and G.P.; writing—review and editing, G.S., L.K., G.P., B.P., and R.N.; visualization, L.K. and G.P.; supervision, G.S.; project administration, G.S.; funding acquisition, G.S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

PRISMA guidelines and methodology were followed.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the Florida Department of Health, James, and Esther King Biomedical Research Program (Award# 24K08 to G.S. and Award# 23A02 and 24A05 to R.N.), Florida State University College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences (FSU-CEHHS, to G.S., and R.N.), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS #440658 to R.N.), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA to R.N), the National Watermelon Promotion Board (NWPB to R.N), Almond Board of California (ABC; ECP-Nagpal-NR-001 to R.N.), and The Peanut Institute (TPI to R.N.).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr. Pradeep Bhide is the Editorial Advisory Board member of the journal Current Neuropharmacology.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

PRISMA checklist is available as supplementary material on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

Supplementary material is available on the publisher's website along with the published article.

CN-23-11-1423_SD1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ling Z., Xiao H., Chen W. Gut microbiome: The cornerstone of life and health. Adv Gut Microbiome Res. 2022;2022:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2022/9894812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lei W., Cheng Y., Gao J., Liu X., Shao L., Kong Q., Zheng N., Ling Z., Hu W. Akkermansia muciniphila in neuropsychiatric disorders: Friend or foe? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023;13:1224155. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1224155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zheng D., Liwinski T., Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020;30(6):492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Afzaal M., Saeed F., Shah Y.A., Hussain M., Rabail R., Socol C.T., Hassoun A., Pateiro M., Lorenzo J.M., Rusu A.V., Aadil R.M. Human gut microbiota in health and disease: Unveiling the relationship. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:999001. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.999001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Derrien M., Vaughan E.E., Plugge C.M., de Vos W.M. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004;54(5):1469–1476. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02873-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dao M.C., Everard A., Aron-Wisnewsky J., Sokolovska N., Prifti E., Verger E.O., Kayser B.D., Levenez F., Chilloux J., Hoyles L., Dumas M.E., Rizkalla S.W., Doré J., Cani P.D., Clément K. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut. 2016;65(3):426–436. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li J., Zhao F., Wang Y., Chen J., Tao J., Tian G., Wu S., Liu W., Cui Q., Geng B., Zhang W., Weldon R., Auguste K., Yang L., Liu X., Chen L., Yang X., Zhu B., Cai J. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0222-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abot A., Brochot A., Pomié N., Astre G., Druart C., de Vos W.M., Knauf C., Cani P.D. Pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila improves glucose metabolism is linked with increased hypothalamic nitric oxide release. Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e18196. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plovier H., Everard A., Druart C., Depommier C., Van Hul M., Geurts L., Chilloux J., Ottman N., Duparc T., Lichtenstein L., Myridakis A., Delzenne N.M., Klievink J., Bhattacharjee A., van der Ark K.C.H., Aalvink S., Martinez L.O., Dumas M.E., Maiter D., Loumaye A., Hermans M.P., Thissen J.P., Belzer C., de Vos W.M., Cani P.D. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat. Med. 2017;23(1):107–113. doi: 10.1038/nm.4236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bian X., Wu W., Yang L., Lv L., Wang Q., Li Y., Ye J., Fang D., Wu J., Jiang X., Shi D., Li L. Administration of Akkermansia muciniphila ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2259. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Depommier C., Everard A., Druart C., Plovier H., Van Hul M., Vieira-Silva S., Falony G., Raes J., Maiter D., Delzenne N.M., de Barsy M., Loumaye A., Hermans M.P., Thissen J.P., de Vos W.M., Cani P.D. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: A proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat. Med. 2019;25(7):1096–1103. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grajeda-Iglesias C., Durand S., Daillère R., Iribarren K., Lemaitre F., Derosa L., Aprahamian F., Bossut N., Nirmalathasan N., Madeo F., Zitvogel L., Kroemer G. Oral administration of Akkermansia muciniphila elevates systemic antiaging and anticancer metabolites. Aging (Albany NY) 2021;13(5):6375–6405. doi: 10.18632/aging.202739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tagliamonte S., Laiola M., Ferracane R., Vitale M., Gallo M.A., Meslier V., Pons N., Ercolini D., Vitaglione P. Mediterranean diet consumption affects the endocannabinoid system in overweight and obese subjects: possible links with gut microbiome, insulin resistance and inflammation. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021;60(7):3703–3716. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02538-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhai Q., Feng S., Arjan N., Chen W. A next generation probiotic, Akkermansia muciniphila. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019;59(19):3227–3236. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1517725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khalili L., Park G., Nagpal R., Salazar G. The role of Akkermansia muciniphila on improving gut and metabolic health modulation: A meta-analysis of preclinical mouse model studies. Microorganisms. 2024;12(8):1627. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12081627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Collaborators G.M.D. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiong R.G., Li J., Cheng J., Zhou D.D., Wu S.X., Huang S.Y., Saimaiti A., Yang Z.J., Gan R.Y., Li H.B. The role of gut microbiota in anxiety, depression, and other mental disorders as well as the protective effects of dietary components. Nutrients. 2023;15(14):3258. doi: 10.3390/nu15143258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pan K.Y., Kok A.A.L., Eikelenboom M., Horsfall M., Jörg F., Luteijn R.A., Rhebergen D., Oppen P., Giltay E.J., Penninx B.W.J.H. The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A longitudinal study of three Dutch case-control cohorts. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(2):121–129. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30491-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Godos J., Currenti W., Angelino D., Mena P., Castellano S., Caraci F., Galvano F., Del Rio D., Ferri R., Grosso G. Diet and mental health: Review of the recent updates on molecular mechanisms. Antioxidants. 2020;9(4):346. doi: 10.3390/antiox9040346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kennedy P.J., Murphy A.B., Cryan J.F., Ross P.R., Dinan T.G., Stanton C. Microbiome in brain function and mental health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016;57:289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bhatia N.Y., Jalgaonkar M.P., Hargude A.B., Sherje A.P., Oza M.J., Doshi G.M. Gut-brain axis and neurological disorders-how microbiomes affect our mental health. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2023;22(7):1008–1030. doi: 10.2174/1871527321666220822172039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hao Z., Meng C., Li L., Feng S., Zhu Y., Yang J., Han L., Sun L., Lv W., Figeys D., Liu H. Positive mood-related gut microbiota in a long-term closed environment: A multiomics study based on the “Lunar Palace 365” experiment. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01506-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu L., Wang H., Chen X., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Xie P. Gut microbiota and its metabolites in depression: From pathogenesis to treatment. EBioMedicine. 2023;90:104527. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Asher G.N., Gerkin J., Gaynes B.N. Complementary therapies for mental health disorders. Med. Clin. North Am. 2017;101(5):847–864. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lakhan S.E., Vieira K.F. Nutritional therapies for mental disorders. Nutr. J. 2008;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meher A.K., Acharya B., Sahu P.K. Probiotics: Bridging the interplay of a healthy gut and psychoneurological well‐being. Food Bioeng. 2024;3(1):126–147. doi: 10.1002/fbe2.12081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pferschy-Wenzig E.M., Pausan M.R., Ardjomand-Woelkart K., Röck S., Ammar R.M., Kelber O., Moissl-Eichinger C., Bauer R. Medicinal plants and their impact on the gut microbiome in mental health: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2022;14(10):2111. doi: 10.3390/nu14102111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yılmaz C., Gökmen V. Neuroactive compounds in foods: Occurrence, mechanism and potential health effects. Food Res. Int. 2020;128:108744. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guo D., Park C., Li Y., Li B., Yang Q., Deng Y., Gao N.L., Li R., Wang X., Yi L., Liu Z. Akkermansia muciniphila ameliorates depressive disorders in a murine alcohol-LPS (mALPS) model. Food Funct. 2022;13(24):12766–12776. doi: 10.1039/D2FO01478E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu F., Guo X., Zhang M., Ou Z., Wu D., Deng L., Lu Z., Zhang J., Deng G., Chen S., Li S., Yi J., Peng Y. An Akkermansia muciniphila subtype alleviates high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders and inhibits the neurodegenerative process in mice. Anaerobe. 2020;61:102138. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meynier M., Daugey V., Mallaret G., Gervason S., Meleine M., Barbier J., Aissouni Y., Lolignier S., Bonnet M., Ardid D., De Vos W.M., Van Hul M., Suenaert P., Brochot A., Cani P.D., Carvalho F.A. Pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila improves irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms and related behavioral disorders in mice. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1):2298026. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2298026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen T., Wang R., Duan Z., Yuan X., Ding Y., Feng Z., Bu F., Liu L., Wang Q., Zhou J., Zhu L., Ni Q., Shi G., Chen Y. Akkermansia muciniphila protects against psychological disorder-induced gut microbiota-mediated colonic mucosal barrier damage and aggravation of colitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:723856. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.723856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ding Y., Bu F., Chen T., Shi G., Yuan X., Feng Z., Duan Z., Wang R., Zhang S., Wang Q., Zhou J., Chen Y. A next-generation probiotic: Akkermansia muciniphila ameliorates chronic stress–induced depressive-like behavior in mice by regulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021;105(21-22):8411–8426. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11622-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sun Y., Zhu H., Cheng R., Tang Z., Zhang M. Outer membrane protein Amuc_1100 of Akkermansia muciniphila alleviates antibiotic-induced anxiety and depression-like behavior in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2023;258:114023. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.114023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yaghoubfar R., Behrouzi A., Ashrafian F., Shahryari A., Moradi H.R., Choopani S., Hadifar S., Vaziri F., Nojoumi S.A., Fateh A., Khatami S., Siadat S.D. Modulation of serotonin signaling/metabolism by Akkermansia muciniphila and its extracellular vesicles through the gut-brain axis in mice. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):22119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79171-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cheng R., Zhu H., Sun Y., Hang T., Zhang M. The modified outer membrane protein Amuc_1100 of Akkermansia muciniphila improves chronic stress-induced anxiety and depression-like behavior in mice. Food Funct. 2022;13(20):10748–10758. doi: 10.1039/D2FO01198K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cheng R., Xu W., Wang J., Tang Z., Zhang M. The outer membrane protein Amuc_1100 of Akkermansia muciniphila alleviates the depression-like behavior of depressed mice induced by chronic stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;566:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yang Y., Zhong Z., Wang B., Xia X., Yao W., Huang L., Wang Y., Ding W. Early-life high-fat diet-induced obesity programs hippocampal development and cognitive functions via regulation of gut commensal Akkermansia muciniphila. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(12):2054–2064. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0437-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen Y., Chen J., Wei H., Gong K., Meng J., Long T., Guo J., Hong J., Yang L., Qiu J., Xiong K., Wang Z., Xu Q. Akkermansia muciniphila-Nlrp3 is involved in the neuroprotection of phosphoglycerate mutase 5 deficiency in traumatic brain injury mice. Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1172710. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1172710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li N., Tan S., Wang Y., Deng J., Wang N., Zhu S., Tian W., Xu J., Wang Q. Akkermansia muciniphila supplementation prevents cognitive impairment in sleep-deprived mice by modulating microglial engulfment of synapses. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(2):2252764. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2252764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ou Z., Deng L., Lu Z., Wu F., Liu W., Huang D., Peng Y. Protective effects of Akkermansia muciniphila on cognitive deficits and amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nutr. Diabetes. 2020;10(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41387-020-0115-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang J., Xu W., Wang R., Cheng R., Tang Z., Zhang M. The outer membrane protein Amuc_1100 of Akkermansia muciniphila promotes intestinal 5-HT biosynthesis and extracellular availability through TLR2 signalling. Food Funct. 2021;12(8):3597–3610. doi: 10.1039/D1FO00115A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guo H., Liu X., Chen T., Wang X., Zhang X. Akkermansia muciniphila improves depressive-like symptoms by modulating the level of 5-HT neurotransmitters in the gut and brain of mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024;61(2):821–834. doi: 10.1007/s12035-023-03602-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., Clarke M., Devereaux P.J., Kleijnen J., Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009;151(4):W. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hardy R.J., Thompson S.G. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. Stat. Med. 1996;15(6):619–629. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6&#x0003c;619::AID-SIM188&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat. Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Duval S., Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.White I.R. Multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J. 2009;9(1):40–56. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0900900103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bamalan O.A., Moore M.J., Al Khalili Y. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2019. Physiology, serotonin. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Caracciolo L., Marosi M., Mazzitelli J., Latifi S., Sano Y., Galvan L., Kawaguchi R., Holley S., Levine M.S., Coppola G., Portera-Cailliau C., Silva A.J., Carmichael S.T. CREB controls cortical circuit plasticity and functional recovery after stroke. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):2250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04445-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Deltheil T., Guiard B.P., Guilloux J.P., Nicolas L., Deloménie C., Repérant C., Maitre E.L., Leroux-Nicollet I., Benmansour S., Coudoré F., David D.J., Gardier A.M. Consequences of changes in BDNF levels on serotonin neurotransmission, 5-HT transporter expression and function: Studies in adult mice hippocampus. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2008;90(2):174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2007.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Roth W., Zadeh K., Vekariya R., Ge Y., Mohamadzadeh M. Tryptophan metabolism and gut-brain homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(6):2973. doi: 10.3390/ijms22062973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mushtaq R., Tarfarosh S.F.A., Dar M.M., Hussain A., Shoib S., Shah T., Shah S., Manzoor M. Is there a link between depressive disorders and tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) gene polymorphism?-study from a distressed area, Kashmir (India). Cureus. 2016;8(7):e673. doi: 10.7759/cureus.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Banskota S., Ghia J.E., Khan W.I. Serotonin in the gut: Blessing or a curse. Biochimie. 2019;161:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2018.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tynan R.J., Naicker S., Hinwood M., Nalivaiko E., Buller K.M., Pow D.V., Day T.A., Walker F.R. Chronic stress alters the density and morphology of microglia in a subset of stress-responsive brain regions. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010;24(7):1058–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yu H., Chen Z. The role of BDNF in depression on the basis of its location in the neural circuitry. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2011;32(1):3–11. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yohn C.N., Gergues M.M., Samuels B.A. The role of 5-HT receptors in depression. Mol. Brain. 2017;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13041-017-0306-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Böer U., Alejel T., Beimesche S., Cierny I., Krause D., Knepel W., Flügge G. CRE/CREB-driven up-regulation of gene expression by chronic social stress in CRE-luciferase transgenic mice: Reversal by antidepressant treatment. PLoS One. 2007;2(5):e431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ohsawa K., Imai Y., Sasaki Y., Kohsaka S. Microglia/] macrophage‐specific protein Iba1 binds to fimbrin and enhances its actin‐bundling activity. J. Neurochem. 2004;88(4):844–856. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dias B., Banerjee S.B., Duman R.S., Vaidya V.A. Differential regulation of brain derived neurotrophic factor transcripts by antidepressant treatments in the adult rat brain. Neuropharmacology. 2003;45(4):553–563. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00198-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gass P., Riva M.A. CREB, neurogenesis and depression. BioEssays. 2007;29(10):957–961. doi: 10.1002/bies.20658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yao H., Zhang D., Yu H., Yuan H., Shen H., Lan X., Liu H., Chen X., Meng F., Wu X., Zhang G., Wang X. Gut microbiota regulates chronic ethanol exposure-induced depressive-like behavior through hippocampal NLRP3-mediated neuroinflammation. Mol. Psychiatry. 2023;28(2):919–930. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01841-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang J., Xue B., Jing B., Tian H., Zhang N., Li M., Lu L., Chen L., Diao H., Chen Y., Wang M., Li X. LPS activates neuroinflammatory pathways to induce depression in Parkinson’s disease-like condition. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:961817. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.961817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Won E., Na K.S., Kim Y.K. Associations between melatonin, neuroinflammation, and brain alterations in depression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;23(1):305. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Haapakoski R., Mathieu J., Ebmeier K.P., Alenius H., Kivimäki M. Cumulative meta-analysis of interleukins 6 and 1β, tumour necrosis factor α and C-reactive protein in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015;49:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Su K.P., Lai H.C., Peng C.Y., Su W.P., Chang J.P.C., Pariante C.M. Interferon-alpha-induced depression: Comparisons between early- and late-onset subgroups and with patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019;80:512–518. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stankiewicz A.M., Goscik J., Majewska A., Swiergiel A.H., Juszczak G.R. The effect of acute and chronic social stress on the hippocampal transcriptome in mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhu X., Shen J., Feng S., Huang C., Wang H., Huo F., Liu H. Akkermansia muciniphila, which is enriched in the gut microbiota by metformin, improves cognitive function in aged mice by reducing the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01567-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang L., Tang L., Feng Y., Zhao S., Han M., Zhang C., Yuan G., Zhu J., Cao S., Wu Q., Li L., Zhang Z. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurised bacterium blunts colitis associated tumourigenesis by modulation of CD8 + T cells in mice. Gut. 2020;69(11):1988–1997. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu P.S., Wang H., Li X., Chao T., Teav T., Christen S., Di Conza G., Cheng W.C., Chou C.H., Vavakova M., Muret C., Debackere K., Mazzone M., Huang H.D., Fendt S.M., Ivanisevic J., Ho P.C. α-ketoglutarate orchestrates macrophage activation through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18(9):985–994. doi: 10.1038/ni.3796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Na Y.R., Stakenborg M., Seok S.H., Matteoli G. Macrophages in intestinal inflammation and resolution: A potential therapeutic target in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16(9):531–543. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0172-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Papakostas G.I., Culpepper L. Understanding and managing cognition in the depressed patient. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2015;76(4):418–425. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13086ah1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Noworyta K., Cieslik A., Rygula R. Neuromolecular underpinnings of negative cognitive bias in depression. Cells. 2021;10(11):3157. doi: 10.3390/cells10113157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ring A., Kim Y.M., Kahn M. Wnt/catenin signaling in adult stem cell physiology and disease. Stem Cell Rev. 2014;10(4):512–525. doi: 10.1007/s12015-014-9515-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chelakkot C., Choi Y., Kim D-K., Park H.T., Ghim J., Kwon Y. Akkermansia muciniphila-derived extracellular vesicles influence gut permeability through the regulation of tight junctions. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50(2):e450. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kim S., Shin Y.C., Kim T.Y., Kim Y., Lee Y.S., Lee S.H., Kim M.N., Eunju O., Kim K.S., Kweon M.N. Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila accelerates intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1):1892441. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1892441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.González-Morelo K.J., Vega-Sagardía M., Garrido D. Molecular insights into O-linked glycan utilization by gut microbes. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:591568. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.591568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu M.J., Yang J.Y., Yan Z.H., Hu S., Li J.Q., Xu Z.X., Jian Y.P. Recent findings in Akkermansia muciniphila-regulated metabolism and its role in intestinal diseases. Clin. Nutr. 2022;41(10):2333–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hino S., Mizushima T., Kaneko K., Kawai E., Kondo T., Genda T., Yamada T., Hase K., Nishimura N., Morita T. Mucin-derived O-glycans act as endogenous fiber and sustain mucosal immune homeostasis via short-chain fatty acid production in rat cecum. J. Nutr. 2020;150(10):2656–2665. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.De Maesschalck C., Van Immerseel F., Eeckhaut V., De Baere S., Cnockaert M., Croubels S. Faecalicoccus acidiformans gen. nov., sp. nov., Isolated from the chicken caecum, and reclassification of Streptococcus pleomorphus (Barnes et al. 1977), Eubacterium biforme (Eggerth 1935) and Eubacterium cylindroides (Cato et al. 1974) as Faecalicoccus pleomorphus comb. nov., Holdemanella biformis gen. nov., comb. nov. and Faecalitalea cylindroides gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively, within the family Erysipelotrichaceae. Int. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014;64(Pt_11):3877–3884. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.064626-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang H., Liu L., Cheng S., Jia Y., Wen Y., Yang X., Meng P., Li C., Pan C., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Zhang J., Zhang F. Assessing the joint effects of brain aging and gut microbiota on the risks of psychiatric disorders. Brain Imaging Behav. 2022;16(4):1504–1515. doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00630-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Liu W., Liu L., Deng Z., Liu R., Ma T., Xin Y., Xie Y., Zhou Y., Tang Y. Associations between impulsivity and fecal microbiota in individuals abstaining from methamphetamine. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024;30(2):e14580. doi: 10.1111/cns.14580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Alpino G.C.Á., Pereira-Sol G.A., Dias M.M., Aguiar A.S., Peluzio M.C.G. Beneficial effects of butyrate on brain functions: A view of epigenetic. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024;64(12):3961–3970. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2137776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Anderson G. Physiological processes underpinning the ubiquitous benefits and interactions of melatonin, butyrate and green tea in neurodegenerative conditions. Melatonin Res. 2024;7(1):20–46. doi: 10.32794/mr112500167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Morris G., Anderson G., Maes M. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal hypofunction in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as a consequence of activated immune-inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative pathways. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;54(9):6806–6819. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0170-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Marinova Z., Leng Y., Leeds P., Chuang D.M. Histone deacetylase inhibition alters histone methylation associated with heat shock protein 70 promoter modifications in astrocytes and neurons. Neuropharmacology. 2011;60(7-8):1109–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Alam M.A., Datta P.K. Epigenetic regulation of excitatory amino acid transporter 2 in neurological disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10:1510. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Miyagishi H., Tsuji M., Saito A., Miyagawa K., Takeda H. Inhibitory effect of yokukansan on the decrease in the hippocampal excitatory amino acid transporter EAAT2 in stress-maladaptive mice. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017;7(4):371–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Anderson G., Maes M. Gut dysbiosis dysregulates central and systemic homeostasis via suboptimal mitochondrial function: Assessment, treatment and classification implications. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020;20(7):524–539. doi: 10.2174/1568026620666200131094445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ameen A.O., Nielsen S.W., Kjær M.W., Andersen J.V., Westi E.W., Freude K.K. Metabolic preferences of astrocytes: Functional metabolic mapping reveals butyrate outcompetes acetate. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2025;45(3):528–541. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241270457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Anderson G. Depression pathophysiology: Astrocyte mitochondrial melatonergic pathway as crucial hub. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;24(1):350. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Luo S., Zhao Y., Zhu S., Liu L., Cheng K., Ye B., Han Y., Fan J., Xia M. Flavonifractor plautii protects against elevated arterial stiffness. Circ. Res. 2023;132(2):167–181. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ogita T., Yamamoto Y., Mikami A., Shigemori S., Sato T., Shimosato T. Oral administration of Flavonifractor plautii strongly suppresses Th2 immune responses in mice. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:379. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Coello K., Hansen T.H., Sørensen N., Ottesen N.M., Miskowiak K.W., Pedersen O., Kessing L.V., Vinberg M. Affective disorders impact prevalence of Flavonifractor and abundance of Christensenellaceae in gut microbiota. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2021;110:110300. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Obi-Azuike C., Ebiai R., Gibson T., Hernandez A., Khan A., Anugwom G., Urhi A., Prasad S., Souabni S.A., Oladunjoye F. A systematic review on gut–brain axis aberrations in bipolar disorder and methods of balancing the gut microbiota. Brain Behav. 2023;13(6):e3037. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhang Q., Yun Y., An H., Zhao W., Ma T., Wang Z., Yang F. Gut microbiome and daytime function in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder. J. Psychosom. Res. 2022;157:110787. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Braune A., Blaut M. Bacterial species involved in the conversion of dietary flavonoids in the human gut. Gut Microbes. 2016;7(3):216–234. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1158395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pan L., Ye H., Pi X., Liu W., Wang Z., Zhang Y., Zheng J. Effects of several flavonoids on human gut microbiota and its metabolism by in vitro simulated fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1092729. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1092729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

PRISMA checklist is available as supplementary material on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

Supplementary material is available on the publisher's website along with the published article.

CN-23-11-1423_SD1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Current Neuropharmacology are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES