Skip to main content
. 2002 Aug 1;21(15):4196–4205. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf396

Table I. Contour length and protein volumes of UvrB–DNA and UvrB*–DNA complexes.

  No. of molecules Class I Class II
    No. of molecules Volume (kDa) Wrap (nm) No. of molecules Volume (kDa) Wrap (nm)
A. UvrB–DNA complexes              
Washed with ATP              
 Wrapped 50 0/50 (0%) 50/50 (100%) 185 ± 26 25
 Not wrapped 6 3/6 (50%) n.d.a 0 3/6 (50%) n.d.a
Washed without ATP              
 Wrapped 0
 Not wrapped 115 45/115 (39%) 76.4 ± 11 0 70/115 (61%) 151 ± 28 0
Reintroduction of ATP              
 Wrapped 64 24/64 (37%) 87.4 ± 10 26 40/64 (63%) 168 ± 14 22
 Not wrapped 0
B. UvrB*–DNA complexes              
Washed with ATP              
 Wrapped 27 0/27 (0%) 27/27 (100%) 135 ± 18 23
 Not wrapped 56 50/56 (89%) 61.7 ± 9 0 6/56 (11%) n.d.a 0
Washed without ATP              
 Wrapped 0
 Not wrapped 36 33/36 (92%) 61.7 ± 10 0 3/36 (8%) n.d.a 0
Reintroduction of ATP              
 Wrapped 20 17/20 (85%) 77.1 ± 5 23 3/20 (15%) 161 ± 9 24
 Not wrapped 51 43/51 (84%) 68.2 ± 8 0 8/51 (16%) 143 ± 6 0

All measured molecules were first divided in two groups; one group containing wrapped complexes, the other containing unwrapped complexes. Of both these, the protein volume and the amount of DNA involved in the wrapping were determined.

aAmount of complexes too low to determine size accurately.