Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of bone metabolism and immune cell indexes in screening for tumor bone metastasis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 247 patients with malignant tumors. conducted on 247 patients with malignant tumors. According the presence of tumor bone metastasis, patients were divided into a bone metastasis group (156 cases) and a non-bone metastasis group (91 cases). Bone metabolism markers [calcium ion (Ca2+), β-Carbox-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), type I procollagen N-terminal peptide (P1NP), osteocalcin (OC)] and immune cell indicators (CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells) were compared between groups. Correlations among these indices were analyzed using Pearson correlation, and interaction effects were evaluated using multiple linear regression with interaction terms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the screening efficacy of each index for tumor bone metastasis. Results: Compared with the non-bone metastasis group, the bone metastasis group showed significantly higher levels of Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, CD3+CD4+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (P<0.05), and lower levels of OC and CD3+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05). According to the Soloway classification, levels of Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, CD3+CD4+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells increased progressively from grade I to grade III (P<0.05), whereas OC and CD3+CD8+ T cells decreased (grade I > grade II > grade III) (P<0.05). Ca2+, β-CTX and P1NP were positively correlated with CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (P<0.05) but negatively correlated with CD3+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05). In contrast, OC was negatively correlated with CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (P<0.05) and positively correlated with CD3+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05). A significant interactive effect was observed between bone metabolism and immune indicators (P<0.05). The AUC the combined model (0.899) was higher than that of individual indicators - Ca2+ (0.835), β-CTX (0.843), P1NP (0.817), OC (0.750), CD3+CD4+ T cells (0.837), CD3+CD8+ T cells (0.771), CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (0.848). Internal validation showed that the accuracy of the combined model in diagnosing tumor bone metastasis was 88.26%. Conclusions: The combined assessment of bone metabolism and immune indicators provides high clinical value for screening tumor bone metastasis.
Keywords: Bone metabolism, immune cells, malignant tumors, bone metastasis, application value
Introduction
Bone tissue is a common site of metastasis for malignant tumors. Patients with bone metastasis often develop skeletal complications, such as bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia [1]. These manifestations not only seriously impairs patients’ quality of life but also indicates a poor prognosis. At present, the diagnosis of bone metastases in malignant tumors mainly relies on imaging examinations. However, its high cost and involvement of radiation make them unsuitable for frequent monitoring [2]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for reliable biomarkers that can aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of tumor bone metastasis.
Bone metabolism markers, including β-type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide (β-CTX), type I procollagen N-terminal peptide (P1NP), osteocalcin (OC), and serum calcium ions (Ca2+), reflect bone remodeling and metabolic activity. These markers are widely used in the diagnosis of metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis [3], and are also closely associated with bone metastasis in malignant tumors [4]. Tumor bone metastasis involves both the proliferation of tumor cells at the primary site and the alteration of the bone microenvironment through the secretion of cytokines, extracellular vesicles, and other bioactive molecules. The bone microenvironment contains a variety of immune cells [5], and dynamic interactions between immune cells and tumor cells play crucial roles during bone metastasis [6].
Osteoclasts release transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) stored in the bone matrix [7]. Activated TGF-β directly inhibits T-cell receptor signaling, impairing the function of CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD3+CD8+ T cells [8]. It also induces the differentiation of naive T cells into regulatory T (Treg) cells and enhances Treg cell function [9], thereby altering the proportion of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells. However, the immune system is limited in its ability to eliminate tumor cells. Tumor cells can suppress immune function by secreting and expressing various inhibitory molecules [10], facilitating tumor adaptation and immune escape within the bone microenvironment.
Current research primarily focuses on the relationship between bone metabolism and tumor bone metastasis, whereas the involvement of immune cell subsets such as CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, this study evaluated the application value of bone metabolism markers (Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC) and immune cell indicators (CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells) in screening for tumor bone metastasis, with the goal of providing new insights into the diagnosis and treatment of this condition.
Material and methods
Sample size estimation
The sample size was calculated using the formula for cross-sectional studies: . The confidence level (Z) was set at 1.96, the expected proportion (P) was conservatively estimated at 0.7, and the allowable error (E) was set at 9.5%. Based on these parameters, the minimum required sample size was 175 cases. Assuming a 20% dropout rate of eligible medical records, the final sample size included was 247 cases.
Research subjects
A retrospective study was conducted using clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with malignant tumors at Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital between June 2023 to June 2025. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 247 patient were included. According to the presence or absence of tumor bone metastasis, patients were divided into a bone metastasis group (n = 156) and a non-bone metastasis group (n = 91). For patients with bone metastases, the Soloway classification [11] was applied based on the number of metastatic lesions. This classification system is widely used in relevant literature and is applicable to all tumor types included in this study, such as prostate cancer [12], lung cancer [13] and breast cancer [14]. According to the Soloway grading criteria, grade I: 1-2 metastatic lesions; grade II: 3-5 metastatic lesions; grade III: >5 metastatic lesions.
Figure 1.
The study flowchart.
Inclusion criteria: (1) Age ≥ 18 years; (2) Histopathologically confirmed solid malignant tumor; (3) Baseline physical condition at admission assessed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score ranging from 0 to 2; (4) Presence of mild bone pain, worsening nocturnal pain, or other symptoms suggestive of bone metastasis at admission, with active cooperation in completing bone metabolism and immune cell index detection; (5) Completion of whole-body bone scans using emission computed tomography (ECT), with further examination of suspected areas by X-rays, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Exclusion criteria: (1) Presence of comorbidities affecting bone metabolism, such as diabetes, osteoporosis, or rheumatoid arthritis; (2) History of fracture within 3 months prior to admission; (3) Patients with immunodeficiency diseases or hematological disorders; (4) Use of immunosuppressive drugs or any medication known to influence immune cell function within the past 3 months; (5) Use of medications that may affect bone metabolism, including bisphosphonates, steroids, or calcium supplements, within the past 3 months; (6) Presence of visceral metastasis (e.g., liver, kidney, brain, spleen, or pancreas).
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital.
Data collection
Baseline data
Data were collected by reviewing patients’ electronic medical records, including age, body mass index (BMI), sex, personal history (smoking and alcohol consumption), tumor type, tumor stage, maximum tumor diameter, tumor differentiation and lymph node metastasis at the time of admission.
Bone metabolism indicators
Bone metabolism data were retrieved from the patients’ bone metabolism test records. The testing procedures were as follows: Prior to confirming bone metastasis, 5 mL of fasting venous blood was collected from each patient into an EDTA anticoagulant tube. A 2 ml aliquot of peripheral blood was then allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 minutes and centrifuged at 3000 r/min for 10 minutes to isolate serum. Serum levels β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), type I procollagen N-terminal peptide (P1NP), and osteocalcin (OC) were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (β-CTX: Wenzhou Kemu Biotechnology Co., Ltd., item number: KMEHu012338; P1NP: Jiangxi Jianglan Pure Biological Reagent Co., Ltd., item number: JLC-A8374; OC: Wuhan Tiande Biotechnology Co., Ltd., item number: TD711187). Serum Ca2+ concentration was detected using the colorimetric method (Beijing Baolabio Technology Co., Ltd., item number: HR8229-CGV) with a fully automated biochemical analyzer (Cobas 8000 C702, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany).
Immune cell detection
Immune cell index data were obtained by reviewing the patient’s immune cell index test records. The testing procedures were as follows: Prior to determining bone metas-tasis status, 5 mL of fasting venous blood was collected from each patient using an EDTA anticoagulant tube.
(1) T-cell subsets analysis: A 100 μL aliquot of peripheral blood was taken from the anticoagulant tube and diluted mix an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The diluted blood was carefully layered onto 5 mL of lymphocyte separation solution in a centrifuge tube. The sample was centrifuged at 2000 r/min for 20 minutes to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The PBMCs were collected, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended. For flow cytometry, 5×105 cells per tube were incubated with fluorescently labeled antibodies against surface molecules. After centrifugation at 1650 r/min for 5 minutes, the supernatant was discarded, and each sample was resuspended in 100 μL of staining buffer containing 10 μL each of anti-hCD3 PE-Cy7, anti-hCD4 FITC, and anti-hCD8 Pacific Blue antibodies. Samples were mixed gently and incubated at 4°C in the dark for 20 minutes. Cells were washed twice with cold FACS buffer, resuspended in 500 μL of wash solution, and fixed. The proportions of CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD3+CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood were analyzed using a BD FACS Canto™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA).
(2) Regulatory T cell (Treg) analysis: 50 uL of whole blood was added to the bottom of a flow cytometry tube (avoiding contact with the tube wall). Then, 8 μL of anti-CD4, 8 μL of anti-CD25, 2 μl of anti-CD127 antibodies were added and vortexed for 5 seconds. The mixture was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 20 minutes. Subsequently, 450 μL of pre-diluted 1× FACS lysing solution was added, vortexed again for 5 seconds, and incubated for an additional 15 minutes under the same conditions. Afterward, 2 mL of saline was added, and the sample was centrifuged at 300 g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was vortexed for 5 seconds, resuspended in 300 μL of saline, and mixed thoroughly prior to acquisition. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using BD FACSDiva™ software with the Treg analysis template to determine the proportion of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells among CD4+ T cells.
Diagnosis of bone metastasis
Although biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing bone metastasis, pathological examination cannot be performed on all suspected lesions due to technical limitations and ethical constraints. Therefore, imaging findings (CT, MRI, or PET/CT) were used as the reference standard. Specifically, in the absence of pathological confirmation, bone metastasis was determined based on characteristic findings on PET/CT (e.g., extensive bone metastases) and corresponding morphological characteristics consistent with bone metastasis on CT. Lesions showing atypical manifestations on CT or MRI were considered benign. The diagnosis of bone metastasis was established when at least one of the following criteria was met [15,16]: (1) Pathological confirmation of the lesion; (2) Unexplained bony changes not attributable to causes other than tumor bone metastasis, accompanied by abnormal tracer uptake in the same region on PET/CT images; (3) Consistent evidence of bone metastasis detected by two or more imaging modalities (CT, MRI, or PET/CT).
Observation indicators
Primary outcomes
① To compare the levels of Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC, as well as the percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells between patients with tumor bone metastasis and those without bone metastasis. ② To compare the differences in Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC, and the percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells among patients with tumor bone metastasis according to Soloway classification subgroups. ③ To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the combined detection of Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC, CD3+CD4+ T cell percentage, CD3+CD8+ T cell percentage and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell percentage for identifying tumor bone metastasis.
Secondary outcome
To analyze the correlation and interaction effects between metabolism markers (Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC) and immune cell indicators (CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells) in patients with tumor bone metastasis.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0 software. Continuous variables were tested for normality and, when normally distributed, were expressed as Mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between two groups were compared using the independent-samples t-test. Categorical data were expressed as number of cases and percentage [n (%)] and compared using the χ2 test. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare differences in various indicators among subgroups with different degrees of bone metastasis. Correlations between continuous variables were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test (for bivariate normal distributions). Interaction effects between indicators were evaluated using multiple linear regression models incorporating interaction terms.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each index for tumor bone metastasis. The Delong test was used to compare differences in the area under the curve (AUC) among indicators. Based on the optimal cutoff values of each indicator, a logistic regression model was constructed to combine indicators for joint prediction of tumor bone metastasis. A two-tailed P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.
Results
Comparison of baseline data between tumor bone metastasis and non-bone metastasis groups
There were no statistically significant differences between the bone metastasis group and non-bone metastasis group in terms of age, BMI, sex, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, tumor type, maximum tumor diameter, or tumor differentiation degree (all P>0.05). However, there were significant differences in tumor stage and lymph node metastasis between the two groups (P<0.05), as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups
| Baseline information | Bone metastasis group (n = 156) | Non-bone metastasis group (n = 91) | t/χ2 value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56.34±15.95 | 55.49±14.34 | 0.419 | 0.676 |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 21.69±3.15 | 22.08±3.46 | 0.905 | 0.366 |
| Gender | 1.732 | 0.188 | ||
| Male | 95 (60.90) | 63 (69.23) | ||
| Female | 61 (39.10) | 28 (30.77) | ||
| Smoking history | 1.120 | 0.290 | ||
| Yes | 76 (48.72) | 38 (41.76) | ||
| No | 80 (51.28) | 53 (58.24) | ||
| Alcohol consumption history | 0.271 | 0.602 | ||
| Yes | 67 (42.95) | 36 (39.56) | ||
| No | 89 (57.05) | 55 (60.44) | ||
| Tumor type | 1.219 | 0.748 | ||
| Lung cancer | 71 (45.51) | 38 (41.76) | ||
| Breast cancer | 40 (25.64) | 29 (31.87) | ||
| Carcinoma of the prostate | 34 (21.80) | 19 (20.88) | ||
| Other malignant tumors | 11 (7.05) | 5 (5.49) | ||
| Tumor staging | 7.521 | 0.006 | ||
| Phase III | 9 (5.77) | 15 (16.48) | ||
| Phase IV | 147 (94.23) | 76 (83.52) | ||
| Maximum tumor diameter | 0.969 | 0.325 | ||
| >5 cm | 94 (60.26) | 49 (53.85) | ||
| ≤5 cm | 62 (39.74) | 42 (46.15) | ||
| Degree of tumor differentiation | 0.278 | 0.870 | ||
| Tall | 19 (12.18) | 11 (12.09) | ||
| Centre | 65 (41.67) | 35 (38.46) | ||
| Low | 72 (46.15) | 45 (49.45) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 4.776 | 0.029 | ||
| Yes | 70 (44.87) | 28 (30.77) | ||
| No | 86 (56.13) | 63 (69.23) |
Comparison of bone metabolism and immune cell indices between the two groups
The levels of Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells group were significantly higher in the bone metastasis group than in the non-bone metastasis group, whereas the levels of OC and CD3+CD8+ T cells were significantly lower (Table 2).
Table 2.
Comparison of bone metabolism markers and immune cell indices between the two groups
| Bone metastasis group (n = 156) | Non-bone metastasis group (n = 91) | t value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+ (mmol/L) | 2.89±0.41 | 2.16±0.32 | 14.590 | <0.001 |
| β-CTX (pg/mL) | 822.45±94.62 | 428.16±68.35 | 34.791 | <0.001 |
| P1NP (ng/mL) | 95.68±20.54 | 55.93±10.87 | 17.110 | <0.001 |
| OC (ng/mL) | 10.53±2.98 | 23.85±4.19 | 29.072 | <0.001 |
| CD3+CD4+ T cell (%) | 52.68±6.93 | 31.62±3.21 | 27.310 | <0.001 |
| CD3+CD8+ T cell (%) | 12.37±1.65 | 25.39±4.06 | 29.960 | <0.001 |
| CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell (%) | 10.38±1.52 | 4.47±1.29 | 31.120 | <0.001 |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
Representative flow cytometry analysis scatter plots further illustrate these differences. As shown in Figure 2, the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells was significantly increased in patients with bone metastasis compared with those without bone metastasis. In contrast, Figure 3 demonstrates that the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in the bone metastasis group. Moreover, Figure 4 shows that the proportion of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells was notably higher in patients with tumor bone metastasis compared with those without bone metastasis.
Figure 2.
The percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cell in the two groups. A: The percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells was 52.18% in the bone metastasis group; B: The percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells was 31.42% in the non-bone metastasis group.
Figure 3.
The percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells in the two groups. A: The percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells was 12.77% in the bone metastasis group; B: The percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells was 25.29% in the non-bone metastasis group.
Figure 4.
The percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in the two groups. A: The percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in the bone metastasis group was 10.41%; B: The percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in the non-bone metastasis group was 4.37%.
Comparison of bone metabolism and immune cell indexes among patients with different numbers of bone metastases
According to the Soloway classification, the 156 patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis were divided into grade I (n = 50), grade II (n = 54) and grade III (n = 52). The peripheral blood Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells increased progressively with the severity of bone metastasis (grade I < grade II < grade III) (P<0.05). Conversely, the expression levels of OC and CD3+CD8+ T cells decreased progressively with the increasing of disease severity (grade I > grade II > grade III) (P<0.05), as shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Comparison of bone metabolism markers and immune cell indices among patients with various metastasis lesions
| Grade I (n = 50) | Grade II (n = 54) | Grade III (n = 52) | F value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+ (mmol/L) | 2.47±0.21 | 2.87±0.23* | 3.31±0.29*,# | 148.901 | <0.001 |
| β-CTX (pg/mL) | 760.34±80.22 | 815.45±89.26* | 889.44±99.72*,# | 26.360 | <0.001 |
| P1NP (ng/mL) | 87.52±8.43 | 96.84±9.29* | 102.36±9.94*,# | 33.430 | <0.001 |
| OC (ng/mL) | 13.28±2.05 | 10.56±1.95* | 7.85±1.62*,# | 106.204 | <0.001 |
| CD3+CD4+ T cells (%) | 40.50±4.17 | 51.73±5.48* | 63.38±7.35*,# | 196.502 | <0.001 |
| CD3+CD8+ T cells (%) | 15.83±4.25 | 12.54±2.19* | 8.87±1.86*,# | 71.930 | <0.001 |
| CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (%) | 9.25±1.32 | 10.27±1.48* | 11.77±1.69*,# | 36.221 | <0.001 |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
Compared with Level I;
P<0.05;
Compared with level II;
P<0.05.
Correlation analysis between bone metabolism indicators and immune cell indicators in patients with tumor bone metastasis
All variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and were normally distributed, meeting the assumptions for Pearson correlation analysis. As shown in Figure 5, serum Ca2+ levels in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis were positively correlated with the percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (r = 0.409, 0.393, P<0.001), and negatively correlated with CD3+CD8+ T cells (r = -0.314, P<0.001). As shown in Figure 6, the serum β-CTX levels were positively correlated with the percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (r = 0.368, 0.410, P<0.001), but negatively correlated with CD3+CD8+ T cells (r = -0.341, P<0.001). Similarly, the serum level of P1NP in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis was positively correlated with the percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells (r = 0.299, P<0.001) and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (r = 0.451, P<0.001), but negatively correlated with CD3+CD8+ T cells (r = -0.209, P = 0.009), see Figure 7. The serum level of OC in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis was negatively correlated with the percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells (r = -0.298, P<0.001) and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (r = -0.309, P<0.001), but positively correlated with the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells (r = 0.201, P = 0.012), see Figure 8.
Figure 5.
Correlation analysis of serum Ca2+ levels with immune cell indices in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis. A: Correlation between Ca2+ and the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells; B: Correlation between Ca2+ and the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells; C: Correlation between Ca2+ and the percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells.
Figure 6.
Correlation analysis of serum β-CTX levels with immune cell indices in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis. A: Correlation between β-CTX and the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells; B: Correlation between β-CTX and the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells; C: Correlation between β-CTX and the percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells. Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen.
Figure 7.
Correlation analysis of serum P1NP levels with immune cell indices in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis. A: Correlation between P1NP and the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells; B: Correlation between P1NP and the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells; C: Correlation between P1NP and the percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells. Notes: P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide.
Figure 8.
Correlation analysis of serum OC levels with immune cell indices in patients with malignant tumor bone metastasis. A: Correlation between OC and the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells; B: Correlation between OC and the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells; C: Correlation between OC and the percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells. Notes: OC, Osteocalcin.
Analysis of interaction effects between bone metabolism indices and immune cell indices in tumor bone metastasis
After adjusting for age, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, tumor type, tumor stage, maximum tumor diameter, tumor differentiation, and lymph node metastasis, multiple linear regression analysis revealed significant interaction effects between bone metabolism and immune cell indicators on tumor bone metastasis. Specifically, the interaction terms between serum Ca2+ and CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells were all statistically significant (β = 0.212, -1.543, 0.195; P<0.05); Similarly, interaction terms between β-CTX and these three immune cell subsets were significant (β = 0.231, -0.168, 0.226, P<0.05); For P1NP, its interaction with CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells were all significant (β = 0.167, -0.143, 0.278, P<0.05); In contrast, OC demonstrated inverse interaction patterns with CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (β = -0.185, 0.137, -0.187, P<0.05), see Table 4.
Table 4.
Analysis of the interaction effect of bone metabolism markers and immune cell indices on tumor bone metastasis
| Item | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| β | 95% CI | P value | β | 95% CI | P value | |
| Ca2+ - immune cell index | ||||||
| Ca2+ | 0.243 | 0.128-0.431 | 0.019 | 0.254 | 0.169-0.487 | 0.005 |
| Ca2+ × CD3+CD4+ T cells | 0.174 | 0.136-0.465 | 0.013 | 0.212 | 0.113-0.431 | 0.007 |
| Ca2+ × CD3+CD8+ T cells | -0.198 | -0.264--0.059 | 0.024 | -0.154 | -0.225--0.036 | 0.009 |
| Ca2+ × CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells | 0.163 | 0.072-0.394 | 0.009 | 0.195 | 0.054-0.354 | 0.004 |
| β-CTX - immune cell index | ||||||
| β-CTX | 0.258 | 0.158-0.537 | 0.014 | 0.279 | 0.184-0.559 | 0.008 |
| β-CTX × CD3+CD4+ T cells | 0.205 | 0.114-0.403 | 0.004 | 0.231 | 0.120-0.419 | 0.002 |
| β-CTX × CD3+CD8+ T cells | -0.187 | -0.255--0.062 | 0.017 | -0.168 | -0.246--0.087 | 0.009 |
| β-CTX × CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells | 0.155 | 0.096-0.395 | 0.009 | 0.226 | 0.109-0.427 | 0.006 |
| P1NP - immune cell index | ||||||
| P1NP | 0.328 | 0.148-0.678 | 0.016 | 0.394 | 0.182-0.729 | 0.014 |
| P1NP × CD3+CD4+ T cells | 0.258 | 0.058-0.487 | 0.024 | 0.167 | 0.025-0.346 | 0.009 |
| P1NP × CD3+CD8+ T cells | -0.104 | -0.237--0.019 | 0.068 | -0.143 | -0.374--0.021 | 0.014 |
| P1NP × CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells | 0.241 | 0.105-0.786 | 0.003 | 0.278 | 0.167-0.562 | <0.001 |
| OC - immune cell index | ||||||
| OC | -0.408 | -0.745--0.186 | 0.045 | -0.398 | -0.519--0.086 | 0.037 |
| OC × CD3+CD4+ T cells | -0.295 | -0.483--0.112 | 0.017 | -0.185 | -0.340--0.058 | 0.008 |
| OC × CD3+CD8+ T cells | 0.104 | 0.029-0.334 | 0.064 | 0.137 | 0.045-0.245 | 0.019 |
| OC × CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells | -0.259 | -0.394--0.128 | 0.023 | -0.187 | -0.269--0.093 | 0.008 |
Note: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin. Model 1: Unadjusted skew variable model; model 2: Adjust the model after age, sex, smoking history, drinking history, tumor type, tumor stage, tumor maximum diameter, tumor differentiation degree and lymph node metastasis.
Efficacy analysis of bone metabolism and immune cell indicators in screening for tumor bone metastasis
ROC curve analysis showed that bone metabolism indicators, including Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, and OC, have potential clinical value in screening for bone metastasis of tumors. Among them, the AUC values for Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, and OC were 0.835, 0.843, 0.817, and 0.750, respectively (Figure 9). Based on the Youden index, the optimal cut-off values, sensitivities, and specificities for Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, and OC were calculated (Table 5). The Delong test was applied to compare the differences in AUCs among these bone metabolism indicators. AUC of Ca2+ (0.835) was significantly higher than that of OC (0.750; Z = 2.318, P = 0.020), and the AUC of β-CTX (0.843) was also significantly higher than that of OC (0.750; Z = 2.467, P = 0.014) (Table 6).
Figure 9.
ROC curve analysis for bone metabolism markers in screening bone metastasis. A: Ca2+; B: β-CTX; C: P1NP; D: OC. Notes: ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; AUC, Area Under the Curve; β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
Table 5.
ROC parameters of each bone metabolism marker in screening tumor bone metastasis
| Index | AUC | Critical value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | P value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+ | 0.835 | 2.75 mmol/L | 0.847 | 0.769 | <0.001 | 0.784-0.866 |
| β-CTX | 0.843 | 780.60 pg/mL | 0.829 | 0.783 | <0.001 | 0.789-0.896 |
| P1NP | 0.817 | 88.95 ng/mL | 0.807 | 0.729 | <0.001 | 0.762-0.872 |
| OC | 0.750 | 13.50 ng/mL | 0.748 | 0.842 | <0.001 | 0.688-0.811 |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
Table 6.
Comparison of AUC values of each bone metabolism markers in screening malignant tumor bone metastasis
| Item 1 | Item 2 | AUC difference value | Standard Error | 95% CI | Z value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+ | β-CTX | -0.008 | 0.229 | -0.064-0.049 | -0.261 | 0.794 |
| Ca2+ | P1NP | 0.018 | 0.232 | -0.044-0.081 | 0.572 | 0.567 |
| Ca2+ | OC | 0.086 | 0.239 | 0.013-0.158 | 2.318 | 0.020 |
| β-CTX | P1NP | 0.026 | 0.234 | -0.037-0.088 | 0.809 | 0.419 |
| β-CTX | OC | 0.093 | 0.242 | 0.019-0.167 | 2.467 | 0.014 |
| P1NP | OC | 0.067 | 0.244 | -0.010-0.145 | 1.705 | 0.088 |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
ROC curve analysis showed that, percentages of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells, exhibited potential discriminative power for screening bone metastasis in malignant tumors. The AUC values for CD3+CD4+ T cell, CD3+CD8+ T cell, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell were 0.850, 0.826, and 0.899, respectively (Figure 10). The optimal cutoff values and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity for each immune index were determined using the maximum Youden index (Table 7). The Delong test further showed that the AUC value for CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (0.848) was significantly higher than that of CD3+CD8+ T cells (0.771) (Z = -2.147, P = 0.032), as shown in Table 8.
Figure 10.
ROC curve analysis for immune cell indices in screening bone metastasis. A: CD3+CD4+ T cells; B: CD3+CD8+ T cells; C: CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells. Notes: ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; AUC, Area Under the Curve.
Table 7.
ROC parameters of immune cell indices in screening tumor bone metastasis
| Index | AUC | Critical value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | P value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+CD4+ T cell | 0.837 | 50.57% | 0.835 | 0.782 | <0.001 | 0.782-0.892 |
| CD3+CD8+ T cell | 0.771 | 13.78% | 0.778 | 0.851 | <0.001 | 0.704-0.838 |
| CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell | 0.848 | 10.35% | 0.845 | 0.839 | <0.001 | 0.795-0.902 |
Table 8.
Comparison of AUC values of each immune cell index in screening malignant tumor bone metastasis
| Item 1 | Item 2 | AUC difference value | Standard Error | 95% CI | Z value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3+CD4+ T cell | CD3+CD8+ T cell | 0.066 | 0.249 | -0.012-0.145 | 1.670 | 0.095 |
| CD3+CD4+ T cell | CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell | -0.011 | 0.234 | -0.073-0.051 | -0.349 | 0.727 |
| CD3+CD8+ T cell | CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell | -0.078 | 0.247 | -0.148--0.007 | -2.147 | 0.032 |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of tumor bone metastasis
Variables with P<0.05 in the univariate analysis (Table 1) were included as independent variables. Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal cutoff values of bone metabolism and immune cell indices for predicting tumor bone metastasis were determined (Tables 5 and 7). The dependent variable was the occurrence of bone metastasis in patients with malignant tumors (0 = no, 1 = yes), and the variable assignments are shown in Table 9.
Table 9.
Assignment table
| Variable | Assignment explanation |
|---|---|
| Tumor staging | Phase III = 0; Phase IV = 1 |
| Lymph node metastasis | Not have = 0; Have = 1 |
| Ca2+ (mmol/L) | ≤2.75 = 0; >2.75 = 1 |
| β-CTX (pg/mL) | ≤780.60 = 0; >780.60 = 1 |
| P1NP (ng/mL) | ≤88.95 = 0; >88.95 = 1 |
| OC (ng/mL) | ≥13.50 = 0; <13.50 = 1 |
| CD3+CD4+ T cell (%) | ≤50.57 = 0; >50.57 = 1 |
| CD3+CD8+ T cell (%) | ≥13.78 = 0; <13.78 = 1 |
| CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell (%) | ≤10.35 = 0; >10.35 = 1 |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
Multivariate Logistic regression analysis (Table 10) showed that elevated levels of Ca2+ (>2.75 mmol/L), β-CTX (>780.60 pg/mL), and P1NP (>88.95 ng/mL), as well as reduced OC (<13.50 ng/mL), were significantly associated with an increased risk of bone metastasis in tumor patients (P<0.05). In addition, immune parameters-including increased CD3+CD4+ T cells (>50.57%) and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (>10.35%), as well as CD3+CD8+ T cells (<13.78%) were also identified as independent risk factors for tumor bone metastasis (P<0.05).
Table 10.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for tumor bone metastasis
| Variable | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor staging | 0.198 | 0.110 | 3.240 | 0.074 | 1.219 (0.982-1.513) |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.203 | 0.108 | 3.533 | 0.061 | 1.225 (0.991-1.514) |
| Ca2+ >2.75 mmol/L | 0.436 | 0.174 | 6.279 | 0.012 | 1.547 (1.101-2.175) |
| β-CTX >780.60 pg/mL | 0.548 | 0.190 | 8.319 | 0.004 | 1.729 (1.192-2.509) |
| P1NP >88.95 ng/mL | 0.397 | 0.168 | 5.584 | 0.018 | 1.487 (1.070-2.067) |
| OC <13.50 ng/mL | 0.304 | 0.150 | 4.107 | 0.043 | 1.355 (1.010-1.818) |
| CD3+CD4+ T cell >50.57% | 0.479 | 0.183 | 6.851 | 0.009 | 1.614 (1.127-2.312) |
| CD3+CD8+ T cell <13.78% | 0.325 | 0.147 | 4.888 | 0.027 | 1.384 (1.038-1.846) |
| CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell >10.35% | 0.629 | 0.204 | 9.507 | 0.002 | 1.876 (1.259-2.795) |
| Constant term | -5.905 | 1.668 | 12.533 | <0.001 | - |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
The efficacy and verification of the combination model of bone metabolism and immune cell indicators for screening for malignant tumor bone metastasis
According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the predictive model for tumor bone metastasis incorporating bone metabolism and immune cell indicators was established as follows: Logit (P) = 0.436 × Ca2+ + 0.548 × β-CTX + 0.397 × P1NP + 0.304 × OC + 0.479 × CD3+CD4+ T cells + 0.325 × CD3+CD8+ T cells + 0.629 × CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells - 5.905. ROC curve analysis showed that, the combined use of Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC, CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells yielded an AUC value of 0.899 for screening tumor bone metastasis (Figure 11).
Figure 11.

ROC curve analysis for combined detection in screening tumor bone metastasis using a combination of bone metabolism indicators (Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC) and immune cell indicators (CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells). Notes: ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; AUC, Area Under the Curve.
Delong test showed that the AUC value of the combined detection for screening malignant tumor bone metastasis was significantly higher than their single use (Table 11). Based on the Youden index, the optimal critical value (Prob) for the combined model was calculated to be 0.845, with a corresponding sensitivity of 0.895 and a specificity of 0.875. When Prob ≥0.845, tumor bone metastasis is predicted to be present, and when Prob <0.845, it indicates the absence of tumor bone metastasis.
Table 11.
Comparison of AUCs between combined detection and each index alone
| Item 1 | Item 2 | AUC difference value | Standard Error | 95% CI | Z value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+ | Index combination | -0.063 | 0.219 | -0.110--0.016 | -2.644 | 0.008 |
| β-CTX | Index combination | -0.056 | 0.221 | -0.104--0.007 | -2.258 | 0.024 |
| P1NP | Index combination | -0.082 | 0.224 | -0.137--0.026 | -2.891 | 0.004 |
| OC | Index combination | -0.149 | 0.232 | -0.217--0.081 | -4.280 | <0.001 |
| CD3+CD4+ T cell | Index combination | -0.061 | 0.223 | -0.115--0.007 | -2.221 | 0.026 |
| CD3+CD8+ T cell | Index combination | -0.128 | 0.237 | -0.191--0.064 | -3.946 | <0.001 |
| CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell | Index combination | -0.050 | 0.222 | -0.100--0.001 | -1.982 | 0.047 |
Notes: β-CTX, β-carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; P1NP, Type I procollagen N-terminal peptide; OC, Osteocalcin.
Internal validation using a confusion matrix demonstrated a high level of agreement between predicted and actual outcomes. The concordance rate for identifying bone metastasis was 88.46% (138/156), and the concordance rate for excluding bone metastasis was 85.71% (78/91). The overall predictive accuracy of the combined model was 87.45% [(138+78)/247)] (Table 12).
Table 12.
Accuracy of combined detection for screening tumor bone metastasis
| Screening results | Actual results | In total | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Tumor bone metastasis | No tumor bone metastasis | |||||
| Tumor bone metastasis | 138 | 13 | 151 | |||
| No tumor bone metastasis | 18 | 78 | 96 | |||
| In total | 156 | 91 | 247 | 88.46% | 85.71% | 87.45% |
Discussions
The incidence of malignant tumors has been increasing annually. When tumor cells invade the bones via the bloodstream or lymphatic system, bone metastasis occurs, which reduces overall survival and impairs the quality of life of patients [17]. Therefore, early and effective diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis are crucial for improving the prognosis and quality of life in these patients.
The results of this study showed that the proportions of stage IV tumors and lymph node metastases in the bone metastasis group were significantly higher than those in the non-bone metastasis group, suggesting an association between tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and tumor bone metastasis. Numerous studies have also confirmed the significant correlation between tumor stage and the occurrence of bone metastasis, such as in prostate cancer [18], breast cancer [19], and others. It is possible that as the tumor stage progresses, the scope of tumor invasion expands. Tumor cells actively divide, reproduce, and grow, which increases their involvement with more distant lymph nodes, making bone metastasis more likely to occur. When lymph nodes are involved, tumor cells can escape immune-mediated cytotoxic effects and induce the production of regulatory T cells (Treg), leading to immune tolerance and promoting tumor metastasis [20]. Once tumor cells enter the bone marrow via the bloodstream, they interact with osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and bone stromal cells, thereby destroying bone tissue and releasing various factors that promote continued tumor proliferation and metastases [21]. Metabolites from bone marrow cells exhibit a chemotactic effect on tumor cells, further facilitating the spread of metastases. In cases of tumor bone metastasis, the bone remodeling process is significantly accelerated, the bone remodeling process is significantly accelerated, leading to an increased bone metabolic rate, which results in abnormalities in bone metabolism [22]. Our study found that the expression levels of Ca2+, β-CTX, and P1NP in the peripheral blood of patients with tumor bone metastasis were significantly higher than those in patients without bone metastasis. Furthermore, these markers exhibited an increasing trend with higher Soloway grade of tumor bone metastasis (grade I < grade II < grade III). In contrast, the expression level of OC in the peripheral blood of patients with tumor bone metastasis was significantly lower than in those without bone metastasis, and it decreased further with increasing Soloway grade (grade I > grade II > grade III). These findings suggest that Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP and OC in peripheral blood may serve as indicators for early screening and severity assessment of bone metastasis in malignant tumors. As a bone metabolism indicator, Ca2+ reflects conditions such as skeletal metabolic disorders, abnormal parathyroid function, and vitamin D deficiency or excess. The primary cause of elevated Ca2+ levels in tumor bone metastasis is the disruption of skeletal integrity, which leads to the release of large amount of calcium from bone into the bloodstream, thereby increasing serum calcium ion concentration [23]. Additionally, during bone metastasis, tumor-stimulated osteolytic activity results in abnormal expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), further mediating an increase in serum Ca2+ levels [24]. Consequently, patients with bone metastasis are prone to developing hypercalcemia. β-CTX, a cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, is released during bone resorption and serves as a specific biomarker of bone metabolism, reflecting the extent of bone destruction [25]. The destruction of bone cells during tumor bone metastasis can lead to osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, resulting in degradation of type I collagen (such as β-CTX) and release of β-CTX into the bloodstream. This results in increased expression levels of β-CTX in peripheral blood. Zuo et al. [26] found that the concentration of β-CTX in peripheral blood of patients with tumor bone metastasis is positively correlated with the concentration of P1NP. The increase in β-CTX also leads to an increase in P1NP. P1NP is a specific marker of type I collagen deposition and directly reflects osteoblast activity and bone formation rate. Lumachi et al. [27] confirmed that serum P1NP level in patients with tumor bone metastasis was significantly higher than in those without bone metastasis, which is consistent with the results of this study. OC, synthesized by osteoblasts, odontoblasts, and proliferating chondrocytes, regulates bone metabolism and serves as a specific and sensitive biochemical marker of bone turnover. In cases of tumor bone metastasis, the bone matrix enhances its reuptake of OC, leading to a relative decrease in OC released into the bloodstream [28]. Therefore, the expression level of OC in the peripheral blood of patients with tumor bone metastasis is reduced.
During the early stages of tumor development, both the innate and adaptive immune systems become activated, contributing to the recognition and elimination of tumor cells, thereby inhibiting tumor initiation and progression [29]. The bone marrow microenvironment contains a diverse array of immune cells, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), Treg, helper T cell, and others, all of which play critical roles throughout the process of tumor bone metastasis [30]. CD3+CD4+ T cells are a subset of T lymphocytes that express both CD3 and CD4 antigens. Miao et al. [31] found that CD3+CD4+ T cell levels correlate with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in lung cancer patients. CD3 is a component of the T-cell receptor complex, expressed on the surface of T cells and internalized upon stimulation by certain lymphokines. CD4 is a glycoprotein expressed primarily on helper T cells, where it functions to recognize major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules on antigen-presenting cells, playing a central role in initiating immune response. Therefore, CD3+CD4+ T cells are important for immune regulation. CD3+CD8+ T cells are T cell subsets that express CD3 and CD8 antigens. CD8+ T cells, also known as cytotoxic T cells lymphocytes (CTLs), are essential for adaptive immune responses due to their ability to specifically recognize and eliminate tumor and virus-infected cells [32]. Kraemer et al. [33] found that CD3+CD8+ T cells exhibit a more sensitive response in tumor immune monitoring, suggesting that tumor progression is subject to immune surveillance. Treg cells are a subset of T lymphocytes with immunosuppressive properties and play a significant role in regulating peripheral immune responses [34]. CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells represent a specific subset of Treg cells. A study of liver cancer [35] revealed that the expression level of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in peripheral blood can serve as an important predictor of biopsy outcomes. These cells inhibit effector T cells by regulating cytokines such as interleukin 10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β). Sun et al. [36] found that a higher percentage of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in peripheral blood is associated a poorer prognosis in patients with liver cancer. Shen et al [37] showed that, in the tumor microenvironment, high expression of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in peripheral blood serves as a marker of Treg cell activity. However, the roles of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD4+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in tumor bone metastasis remain unclear. This study found that the percentages of both CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in the tumor bone metastasis group were significantly higher than those in non-bone metastasis group, with an increasing trend across the Soloway grades of bone metastasis (grade I < grade II < grade III). In contrast, the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T cells in the tumor bone metastasis group was significantly lower than that in the non-bone metastasis group and showed a decreasing trend with the increasing Soloway grade of tumor bone metastasis (grade I > grade II > grade III). These findings suggest that the expression levels of CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells in peripheral blood could serve as indicators for early screening and evaluation of bone metastasis in malignant tumors. The possible reasons are as follows: (1) In the early stages of tumor bone metastasis, the immune response initially promotes the activity of CD3+CD8+ T cells. However, as tumor progression occurs, CD3+CD8+ T cells become suppressed. The ratio of CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ T cells maintains cellular immune balance, and disruption of this balance promotes tumor bone metastasis [38]. (2) The inhibitory effect of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells on the proliferation of effector T cells and tumor infiltration is correlated [39]. In tumor bone metastasis, the enrichment of Treg cells is often associated with bone metastasis. For example, through the release of cytokines and activation of signaling pathways, Treg cells inhibit the anti-tumor immune response and promote the growth of tumor cells in bone tissue [40]. For instance, Treg cells have been shown to promote bone resorption at the bone metastasis site by affecting the activity of osteoclasts or regulating the RANKL-RANK signaling pathway [41]. These findings suggests that the increased proportion of Treg cells in tumor bone metastasis is not only associated with immune suppression but may also contribute to bone destruction by regulating the bone metabolic microenvironment.
A complex interaction exists between the immune system and the skeletal system. Immune cells and bone cells coexist in the bone marrow, where immune cells contribute to the regulation of bone homeostasis through the secretion of inflammatory factors and related ligands [42]. Conversely, bone metabolism can influence the proliferation and differentiation of immune cells [43]. The results of this study indicate a significant correlation between peripheral blood bone metabolism markers (Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC) and immunity parameters (CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells) in patients with tumor bone metastasis. Among them, the expression levels of Ca2+, β-CTX and P1NP in peripheral blood of patients with tumor bone metastasis were positively correlated with the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells, and negatively correlated with CD3+CD8+ T cells percentage. In contrast, the expression level of OC was negatively correlated with the percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells but positively with CD3+CD8+ T cells percentage. Potential mechanisms underlying these correlations include: (1) Active osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in tumor bone metastases not only releases Ca2+ and increases β-CTX levels but also releases TGF-β stored within the bone matrix [44]. Active TGF-β directly inhibits T cells receptor signaling and immune synapse formation, impairing the function of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. This subsequently affects immune cell migration and weakening anti-tumor immunity. (2) TGF-β is a key inducer of naïve T cells differentiation into Treg cells and enhances the immunosuppressive function of existing Treg cells, leading to an increased proportion of CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells. Zhao et al. [45] found that an increase in Treg cells promotes the formation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment, thereby facilitating tumor bone metastasis. Therefore, as bone destruction progresses (higher β-CTX), more TGF-β is released, potentially increasing the proportion of Treg cells. (3) The increase in P1NP and decrease in OC levels indicate osteoblast function dysregulated or an imbalance in bone formation and resorption [46,47]. This imbalance reflects the disruption of bone microenvironment homeostasis due to tumor infiltration, which correlates with immune suppression within the metastatic niche [48]. The interaction between bone metabolism and immune cells during tumor bone metastasis suggests a bidirectional relationship. We further analyzed the interaction effects between bone metabolism markers and immune cell indices, and the results revealed significant effects of these interactions on tumor bone metastasis. The underlying mechanism involves the release of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) by tumor cells upon bone infiltration. RANKL binds to RANK receptors in osteoclast precursors, leading to osteoclasts differentiation and maturation, which induces bone destruction (i.e., increased β-CTX and Ca2+) and the release of TGF-β during bone resorption. This process promotes the expansion and activation of Treg cells, inhibiting T cell function (i.e., increased CD3+CD4+ T cells and decreased CD3+ CD8+ T cells), and facilitating tumor immune escape. On the contrary, the increase in Treg cells inhibits the effector T cells, destroys the homeostasis of bone microenvironment, leads to the imbalance of bone formation and absorption (i.e., the increase of P1 NP and the decrease of OC), and promotes osteoclast activation and bone resorption (i.e., the increase of β-CTX and Ca2+). Therefore, elevated levels of β-CTX and Ca2+ may reflect not only the severity of bone metastasis but also a state of local and systemic immunosuppressive state (increased Treg, inhibited CD8+ T cell function). The increased Treg cells contribute to the process of bone destruction, exacerbating the pathological cycle. Similarly, the rise in P1NP, accompanied by reduced or dysregulated OC levels, suggests impaired bone formation and repair mechanisms. This is closely associated with a dysregulated pathological microenvironment, including enhanced immune suppression.
The high affinity of tumor cells for bone is attributed to the rich blood supply in bone marrow and the frequent high expression of adhesion molecules on tumor cells, which facilitates their adherence to bone marrow stromal cells [49]. This interaction significantly increases the likelihood of bone metastasis. Numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of bone metabolism markers in monitoring and screening for tumor bone metastasis [50,51]. However, these studies often overlook the regulation of the bone microenvironment by the immune system. This study applied ROC curve analysis and found that, the AUC for evaluating tumor bone metastasis by combining bone metabolism markers (Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC) and immune cell indicators (CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells) was 0.899, which was higher than that of individual bone metabolism indicators [Ca2+ (0.835), β-CTX (0.843), P1NP (0.817), OC (0.750)] and individual immune cell indicators [CD3+CD4+ T cells (0.837), CD3+CD8+ T cells (0.771), CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cells (0.848)]. At the same time, the overall accuracy of the combined bone metabolism and immune indicators for determining whether a tumor had bone metastasis was 88.26%. This suggests that the combination of bone metabolism markers and immune cell indicators in peripheral blood provides high diagnostic accuracy for evaluating bone metastasis in malignant tumors. This combined approach offers a promising tool for initial screening and risk stratification of patients suspected of having tumor bone metastasis, reducing unnecessary imaging procedures in certain patients. Moreover, integrating peripheral blood bone metabolism markers with immune cell markers enhances the monitoring of changes associated with tumor bone metastasis, thereby improving both diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. Thus, it is recommended that patients with malignant tumors undergo regular testing for both bone metabolism and immune markers. This strategy enables early detection and intervention of bone metastasis, ultimately improving patients’ quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.
This study has several limitations: (1) It is a single-center, retrospective study with a relatively small sample size, which limits the representativeness of the results. (2) Due to the lack of external validation, the efficacy of combined screening using bone metabolism and immune cell indicators for tumor bone metastasis has not been externally validated. Given these limitations, future research should include multicenter, prospective studies with larger sample size and additional external validation (e.g., at least 500 cases from an independent cohort) to further elucidate the pathological mechanism of tumor bone metastasis.
Conclusion
The peripheral blood levels Ca2+, β-CTX, P1NP, OC, CD3+CD4+ T cell percentage, CD3+CD8+ T cell percentage, and CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg cell percentage have certain screening value for bone metastasis in malignant tumors. The combined monitoring of these indicators provides a more comprehensive assessment of the bone metastasis burden, activity, and immune microenvironment status.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the 2025 Hospital level Youth Project of Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital (YK202514).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Okabe H, Aoki K, Yogosawa S, Saito M, Marumo K, Yoshida K. Downregulation of CD24 suppresses bone metastasis of lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:112–120. doi: 10.1111/cas.13435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Isaac A, Dalili D, Dalili D, Weber MA. State-of-the-art imaging for diagnosis of metastatic bone disease. Radiologe. 2020;60:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00117-020-00666-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tanaka H. Biochemical markers of bone turnover. New aspect. Metabolic bone markers in osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Calcium. 2009;19:1142–1147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Song B, Li X, Zhou Q, Yang X, Jiang Y, Wang A. Application of bone turnover markers PICP and beta-CTx in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer with bone metastases. Clin Lab. 2018;64:11–16. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2017.161021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu C, Wang M, Xu C, Li B, Chen J, Chen J, Wang Z. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for bone metastases: specific microenvironment and current situation. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:8970173. doi: 10.1155/2021/8970173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bui JD, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunosurveillance, immunoediting and inflammation: independent or interdependent processes? Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith HA, Kang Y. The metastasis-promoting roles of tumor-associated immune cells. J Mol Med (Berl) 2013;91:411–429. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1021-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mariathasan S, Turley SJ, Nickles D, Castiglioni A, Yuen K, Wang Y, Kadel EE III, Koeppen H, Astarita JL, Cubas R, Jhunjhunwala S, Banchereau R, Yang Y, Guan Y, Chalouni C, Ziai J, Senbabaoglu Y, Santoro S, Sheinson D, Hung J, Giltnane JM, Pierce AA, Mesh K, Lianoglou S, Riegler J, Carano RAD, Eriksson P, Hoglund M, Somarriba L, Halligan DL, van der Heijden MS, Loriot Y, Rosenberg JE, Fong L, Mellman I, Chen DS, Green M, Derleth C, Fine GD, Hegde PS, Bourgon R, Powles T. TGFbeta attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature. 2018;554:544–548. doi: 10.1038/nature25501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sun G, Wang Y, Ti Y, Wang J, Zhao J, Qian H. Regulatory B cell is critical in bone union process through suppressing proinflammatory cytokines and stimulating Foxp3 in Treg cells. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2017;44:455–462. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smith HA, Kang Y. The metastasis-promoting roles of tumor-associated immune cells. J Mol Med (Berl) 2013;91:411–429. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1021-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Soloway MS, Hardeman SW, Hickey D, Raymond J, Todd B, Soloway S, Moinuddin M. Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan. Cancer. 1988;61:195–202. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880101)61:1<195::aid-cncr2820610133>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Klaff R, Varenhorst E, Berglund A, Hedlund PO, Sjoberg F, Sandblom G SPCG-5 Study Group. Clinical presentation and predictors of survival related to extent of bone metastasis in 900 prostate cancer patients. Scand J Urol. 2016;50:352–359. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1209689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu Y, Ma H, Dong T, Yan Y, Sun L, Wang W. Clinical significance of expression level of CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in bone metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23:378–388. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02431-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leeming DJ, Koizumi M, Qvist P, Barkholt V, Zhang C, Henriksen K, Byrjalsen I, Karsdal MA. Serum N-terminal propeptide of collagen type I is associated with the number of bone metastases in breast and prostate cancer and correlates to other bone related markers. Biomark Cancer. 2011;3:15–23. doi: 10.4137/BIC.S6484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hu C, Wu J, Duan Z, Qian J, Zhu J. Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction for bone metastasis in newly diagnosed malignant tumor patients. Am J Transl Res. 2024;16:5890–5899. doi: 10.62347/MPEV9272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duan J, Fang W, Xu H, Wang J, Chen Y, Ding Y, Dong X, Fan Y, Gao B, Hu J, Huang Y, Huang C, Huang D, Liang W, Lin L, Liu H, Ma Z, Shi M, Song Y, Tang C, Wang J, Wang L, Wang Y, Wang Z, Yang N, Yao Y, Yu Y, Yu Q, Zhang H, Zhao J, Zhao M, Zhu Z, Niu X, Zhang L, Wang J. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis in lung cancer (2022 edition) J Natl Cancer Cent. 2023;3:256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cathomas R, Bajory Z, Bouzid M, El Ghoneimy A, Gillessen S, Goncalves F, Kacso G, Kramer G, Milecki P, Pacik D, Tantawy W, Lesniewski-Kmak K. Management of bone metastases in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Urol Int. 2014;92:377–386. doi: 10.1159/000358258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Afriansyah A, Hamid ARA, Mochtar CA, Umbas R. Survival analysis and development of a prognostic nomogram for bone-metastatic prostate cancer patients: a single-center experience in Indonesia. Int J Urol. 2019;26:83–89. doi: 10.1111/iju.13813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhong X, Lin Y, Zhang W, Bi Q. Predicting diagnosis and survival of bone metastasis in breast cancer using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2023;13:18301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45438-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chiappetta M, Lococo F, Leuzzi G, Sperduti I, Bria E, Petracca Ciavarella L, Mucilli F, Filosso PL, Ratto G, Spaggiari L, Facciolo F, Margaritora S. Survival analysis in single N2 station lung adenocarcinoma: the prognostic role of involved lymph nodes and adjuvant therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Riccio AI, Wodajo FM, Malawer M. Metastatic carcinoma of the long bones. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76:1489–1494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mao L, Wang L, Xu J, Zou J. The role of integrin family in bone metabolism and tumor bone metastasis. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:119. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01417-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang P, Lan M, Peng AF, Yu QF, Chen WZ, Liu ZL, Liu JM, Huang SH. Serum calcium, alkaline phosphotase and hemoglobin as risk factors for bone metastases in bladder cancer. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McCauley LK, Martin TJ. Twenty-five years of PTHrP progress: from cancer hormone to multifunctional cytokine. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:1231–1239. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Auzina D, Erts R, Lejniece S. Prognostic value of the bone turnover markers in multiple myeloma. Exp Oncol. 2017;39:53–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zuo CT, Yin DC, Fan HX, Lin M, Meng Z, Xin GW, Zhang YC, Cheng L. Study on diagnostic value of P1NP and beta-CTX in bone metastasis of patients with breast cancer and the correlation between them. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:5277–5284. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201906_18194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lumachi F, Santeufemia DA, Del Conte A, Mazza F, Tozzoli R, Chiara GB, Basso SM. Carboxy-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) of type I collagen as markers of bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:2593–2596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koizumi M, Yonese J, Fukui I, Ogata E. Metabolic gaps in bone formation may be a novel marker to monitor the osseous metastasis of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2002;167:1863–1866. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Park J, Hsueh PC, Li Z, Ho PC. Microenvironment-driven metabolic adaptations guiding CD8(+) T cell anti-tumor immunity. Immunity. 2023;56:32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.He N, Jiang J. Contribution of immune cells to bone metastasis pathogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:1019864. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1019864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miao C, Chen Y, Zhang H, Zhao W, Wang C, Ma Z, Zhu S, Hu X. Heterogeneity of lymphocyte subsets in predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment response in advanced lung cancer: an analysis across different pathological types, therapeutic drugs, and age groups. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024;13:1264–1276. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mazzaschi G, Madeddu D, Falco A, Bocchialini G, Goldoni M, Sogni F, Armani G, Lagrasta CA, Lorusso B, Mangiaracina C, Vilella R, Frati C, Alfieri R, Ampollini L, Veneziani M, Silini EM, Ardizzoni A, Urbanek K, Aversa F, Quaini F, Tiseo M. Low PD-1 expression in cytotoxic CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes confers an immune-privileged tissue microenvironment in NSCLC with a prognostic and predictive value. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:407–419. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kraemer AI, Chong C, Huber F, Pak H, Stevenson BJ, Muller M, Michaux J, Altimiras ER, Rusakiewicz S, Simo-Riudalbas L, Planet E, Wiznerowicz M, Dagher J, Trono D, Coukos G, Tissot S, Bassani-Sternberg M. The immunopeptidome landscape associated with T cell infiltration, inflammation and immune editing in lung cancer. Nat Cancer. 2023;4:608–628. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00548-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stephens LA, Barclay AN, Mason D. Phenotypic characterization of regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells in rats. Int Immunol. 2004;16:365–375. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhou W, Deng J, Chen Q, Li R, Xu X, Guan Y, Li W, Xiong X, Li H, Li J, Cai X. Expression of CD4+CD25+CD127(Low) regulatory T cells and cytokines in peripheral blood of patients with primary liver carcinoma. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17:712–719. doi: 10.7150/ijms.44088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun H, Cao Z, Zhao B, Zhou D, Chen Z, Zhang B. An elevated percentage of CD4(+)CD25(+)CD127(low) regulatory T cells in peripheral blood indicates a poorer prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25:340. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03940-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shen LS, Wang J, Shen DF, Yuan XL, Dong P, Li MX, Xue J, Zhang FM, Ge HL, Xu D. CD4(+)CD25(+)CD127(low/-) regulatory T cells express Foxp3 and suppress effector T cell proliferation and contribute to gastric cancers progression. Clin Immunol. 2009;131:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li Y, Wu Z, Ni C, Li Y, Wang P. Evaluation of the clinical significance of lymphocyte subsets and myeloid suppressor cells in patients with renal carcinoma. Discov Oncol. 2024;15:512. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01405-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fei F, Yu Y, Schmitt A, Rojewski MT, Chen B, Gotz M, Dohner H, Bunjes D, Schmitt M. Dasatinib inhibits the proliferation and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Br J Haematol. 2009;144:195–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Qianmei Y, Zehong S, Guang W, Hui L, Lian G. Recent advances in the role of Th17/Treg cells in tumor immunity and tumor therapy. Immunol Res. 2021;69:398–414. doi: 10.1007/s12026-021-09211-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ouyang J, Hu S, Zhu Q, Li C, Kang T, Xie W, Wang Y, Li Y, Lu Y, Qi J, Xia M, Chen J, Yang Y, Sun Y, Gao T, Ye L, Liang Q, Pan Y, Zhu C. RANKL/RANK signaling recruits Tregs via the CCL20-CCR6 pathway and promotes stemness and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15:437. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-06806-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xiang L, Gilkes DM. The contribution of the immune system in bone metastasis pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:999. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen S, Lei J, Mou H, Zhang W, Jin L, Lu S, Yinwang E, Xue Y, Shao Z, Chen T, Wang F, Zhao S, Chai X, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Ye Z, Li B. Multiple influence of immune cells in the bone metastatic cancer microenvironment on tumors. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1335366. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1335366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mohammad KS, Akhund SA. From tumor to bone: growth factor receptors as key players in cancer metastasis. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2024;29:184. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2905184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao E, Wang L, Dai J, Kryczek I, Wei S, Vatan L, Altuwaijri S, Sparwasser T, Wang G, Keller ET, Zou W. Regulatory T cells in the bone marrow microenvironment in patients with prostate cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:152–161. doi: 10.4161/onci.1.2.18480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang S, Huang K, Zhou T, Wang Y, Xu Y, Tang Q, Xiao G. Serum bone metabolism biomarkers in predicting tumor bone metastasis risk and their association with cancer pain: a retrospective study. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2025;6:1514459. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1514459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ying M, Mao J, Sheng L, Wu H, Bai G, Zhong Z, Pan Z. Biomarkers for prostate cancer bone metastasis detection and prediction. J Pers Med. 2023;13:705. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Owen KL, Parker BS. Beyond the vicious cycle: the role of innate osteoimmunity, automimicry and tumor-inherent changes in dictating bone metastasis. Mol Immunol. 2019;110:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen M, Fu Z, Wu C. Tumor-derived exosomal ICAM1 promotes bone metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer by inducing CD8+ T cell exhaustion. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2024;175:106637. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2024.106637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dean-Colomb W, Hess KR, Young E, Gornet TG, Handy BC, Moulder SL, Ibrahim N, Pusztai L, Booser D, Valero V, Hortobagyi GN, Esteva FJ. Elevated serum P1NP predicts development of bone metastasis and survival in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:631–636. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2374-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Takahashi S. Evaluation of cancer-induced bone diseases by bone metabolic marker. Clin Calcium. 2006;16:581–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]










