Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Dec 15;31(24):5137–5144. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-0197

Facts and Hopes of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Redirected Natural Killer T cells

Amy N Courtney 1,*, Xin Zhou 2,3,*, Gengwen Tian 1,*, Ying Wang 1,*, Leonid S Metelitsa 1,#, Gianpietro Dotti 2,4,#
PMCID: PMC12616409  NIHMSID: NIHMS2115852  PMID: 41118265

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered invariant natural killer T cells (CAR-NKTs) are a novel cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Unlike conventional T cells, NKTs are characterized by innate antitumor properties, minimal alloreactivity, and a unique ability to modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME). This article provides a comprehensive overview of preclinical and early clinical studies evaluating CAR-NKTs in both autologous and allogeneic clinical settings. We discuss the contributions of CAR signaling domains, cytokine co-expression, and other functional measures that correlate with CAR-NKT persistence, function, and metabolic fitness. We also discuss the critical role of immunocompetent animal models in elucidating the interactions of CAR-NKTs with the TME and other components of the immune system. Finally, we review strategies that combine CAR-NKTs with other therapeutic approaches to promote potential synergistic benefits in cancer patients.

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells have achieved remarkable success as a breakthrough cancer immunotherapy for patients with hematologic malignancies. However, progress in solid tumors remains limited due to key challenges including a scarcity of targetable tumor-associated antigens, physical barriers to tumor infiltration, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) (13). Additionally, the prohibitive cost of manufacturing autologous CAR-T cells (CAR-Ts) has hindered their broader clinical application. In this context, innate immune cells such as natural killer cells (NKs) (4,5), γδT cells (6,7), and invariant natural killer T cells (NKTs) (8,9) are emerging as promising alternative platforms. These cells possess intrinsic antitumor properties and offer “off-the-shelf” potential due to their limited alloreactivity.

NKTs are evolutionarily conserved innate lymphocytes that significantly differ from conventional CD4 and CD8 T cells (Table 1). NKTs are a small fraction of the circulating immune cells (on average less than 0.1% of peripheral blood mononuclear cells), and are characterized by the unique expression an invariant T cell receptor alpha chain (iTCR) (10). In contrast to conventional αβTCRs expressed by CD4 and CD8 T cells, iTCR is not restricted by the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), but recognizes α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer) and other glycolipids presented by the monomorphic CD1d molecule (11). They play a critical role in mediating protective immune responses against several pathogens (12). Further, an increased frequency of NKTs in the peripheral blood and at tumor sites has been shown to correlate with better clinical outcomes in several human malignancies, suggesting that NKTs participate in the antitumor immune response (1315). In models of neuroblastoma (NB), NKTs migrate to tumors in response to certain chemokines such as CCL2 and CCL20 (14,16). Tumor-infiltrating NKTs also co-localize with CD1d-expressing tumor-associated macrophages (17), which they eliminate or polarize to the M1-like phenotype thereby remodeling the TME to be less immunosuppressive (1719). Similarly, NKTs have been shown to block myeloid-derived suppressor cells (2023), and donor-derived NKTs have also been reported to mitigate the occurrence of graft versus host disease (GvHD) in the allogeneic stem cell transplant setting (2426). These intrinsic properties have motivated our groups and others to exploit this unique cell subset for the development of CAR-NKT cell products that target both specific tumor antigens and elements of the TME and can also be used as “off-the-shelf” cell therapy products. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the latest pre-clinical and clinical advances in CAR-NKT engineering for the treatment of cancer and future directions in the field.

Table 1.

Biological and clinical characteristics of T cells and NKT cells for CAR-based immunotherapy.

T cells NKT cells
Frequency in PBMCs 45–70% 0.01–1%
TCR αβ TCR Invariant TCR
MHC restriction Yes No
Target antigens MHC-peptide CD1d-glycolipid
Tissue trafficking ability Low High
Proliferation rate post-activation High High
Alloreactive Yes No
Manufacturing strategy Protocol established/consistent across field Starting material & stimulation techniques vary
Clinical development Multiple FDA-approved products Phase I trials
Safety profile CRS, ICANS, TLS reported frequently Low-grade CRS/one DLT reported

MHC, major histocompatibility complex. CRS, cytokine release syndrome. DLT, dose-limiting toxicity.

ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

TCR, T cell receptor. TLS, tumor lysis syndrome.

Human CAR-NKTs from pre-clinical models to phase I clinical studies

CAR-redirected human NKTs were first studied in the context of NB models using a CAR that targets the ganglioside GD2 (GD2.CAR) (27). This study provided proof-of-concept that human NKTs can be transduced, expanded to clinical scale, and redirected to eliminate GD2+ NB cells while maintaining the cytotoxic function of the native iTCR (Figure 1). Additionally, GD2.CAR-NKTs were found to traffic more effectively to tumor sites than GD2.CAR-Ts in a xenogeneic NB mouse model (27). Similarly, human NKTs expressing a CD19.CAR mediated cytotoxicity against both CD19+ lymphoma cell lines and CD1d+ lymphoma cell lines (28,29). Through dual targeting of tumor antigen and CD1d, CD19.CAR-NKTs have also been shown to eliminate CD19+CD1d+ primary mantle cell lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma cells more effectively than CD19.CAR T cells (29). More recently, human NKTs have been engineered to express CARs that target multiple myeloma antigens such as BCMA and CD38. Redirected human NKTs demonstrated anti-tumor activity when cultured with bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated from multiple myeloma patients, with one patient sample also showing activity against CD1d+ malignant cells (30). CAR-NKTs have also been developed to target clonal TCRVβ chains expressed by T cell malignancies. Engineered CAR-NKTs effectively lysed T cell lymphoma and leukemia cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from two patients while sparing the remaining normal T cells (31). Beyond CAR-NKTs generated from peripheral blood cells, there is growing interest in genetically manipulating hematopoietic stem cells to differentiate into CAR-NKTs. Specifically, CD34+ cells isolated from cord blood units have been engineered to express the iTCR and a CAR of interest followed by an extended culturing process that leads to NKT differentiation (32). This system has been used to generate “off-the-shelf” NKTs expressing CARs specific for BCMA, CD19, CD33, GD2, and GPC3, all of which have demonstrated anti-tumor activity in vitro and in tumor-bearing immunodeficient mouse models (32).

Figure 1. CAR-NKT and armored CAR-NKTs exploit direct antitumor effects and remodel the tumor microenvironment.

Figure 1.

CAR engineered NKTs can directly exploit cytotoxic activity against tumor cells upon engaging the antigen. CAR-NKTs retain the physiologic function of the native invariant TCR (iTCR) and remodel the tumor microenvironment by engaging CD1d expressing cells such as M2-like tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and dendritic cells (DCs). Cross-talk with DCs promotes epitope spreading and activation of endogenous T cells recognizing neoantigens. CAR-NKTs can be further engineered to express cytokines such as IL-15, IL-12, and IL-19 that can promote expansion and survival and improve metabolic fitness. Similarly, overexpression of specific transcription factors (TFs) such as LEF, BTG1 and PRMD1 can promote CAR-NKT survival. CD62L expression characterizes a subset of NKTs and CAR-NKTs with superior proliferative potential. CD62L expression is regulated by the TF FOXO1 and can be promoted by IL-12. (Created in BioRender. Zhou, X. [2025] https://BioRender.com/0xghixb.)

Role of signaling endodomains in CAR-NKTs.

The incorporation of co-stimulatory endodomains such as CD28 and 4–1BB into CAR constructs has been crucial to the clinical success of CAR-Ts in patients with hematologic malignancies (33). The role of these endodomains in shaping the activity of CAR-NKTs has been studied in multiple contexts. For example, GD2.CAR-NKTs encoding CD28 or 4–1BB (second-generation) or both CD28 and 4–1BB in tandem (third-generation) produced high levels of IFNγ (27). NKTs expressing both constructs demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity in an in vivo NB xenotransplant model, and the third-generation construct mediated durable tumor control after repeat dosing. In the context of multiple myeloma, NKTs expressing a CD38.CAR with the same second- and third-generation co-stimulatory endodomain arrangements showed a similar in vitro Th1-biased cytokine profile (30). In lymphoma models, NKTs expressing a third-generation CD19.CAR with CD28 and OX40 proliferated better than NKTs with a CD28-only second-generation construct after in vitro stimulation (29). Overall, these data support the inclusion of co-stimulatory endodomains in CAR constructs to promote a prominent Th1 phenotype in human CAR-NKTs.

Role of cytokine co-expression in CAR-NKTs.

Early in the course of pre-clinical studies, CAR-Ts and CAR-NKs cells co-expressing cytokines like IL-15 were shown to be superior to cells without cytokine co-expression in terms of in vivo persistence and antitumor activity (3436) (Figure 1). This has also been demonstrated clinically in multiple trials; for example, IL-15 co-expressing CAR-NKs derived from cord blood units showed clinical activity in a phase I/II clinical study in patients with relapsed B cell malignancies (4), and GPC3.CAR-Ts with IL-15 co-expression mediated responses in children with solid tumors while GPC3.CAR-Ts alone did not (37). In human NKTs, IL-15 co-expression induces more robust proliferation and promotes a Th1-like cytokine profile (38) while also protecting against hypoxia in the TME of xenogeneic NB mice (16). GD2.CAR-NKTs with CD28 co-stimulation and IL-15 co-expression produced higher levels of IFNγ, persisted better after chronic in vitro stimulation, and demonstrated superior persistence and anti-tumor activity in a xenogeneic NB model compared to NKTs expressing the CAR alone (39). Beyond IL-15, other cytokines have been shown to enhance CAR-NKT functionality through transgenic co-expression or incorporation into culture conditions during in vitro CAR-NKT expansion. For example, Ngai et al showed that supplementing CAR-NKT growth medium with IL-21 boosts NKT in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo anti-tumor activity (40). Liu et al showed that CAR-NKTs co-expressing IL-21 persisted better than CAR-NKTs without the cytokine in a xenogeneic renal tumor model, though improvement in anti-tumor activity in this model was modest (41). O’Neal et al demonstrated that co-administering recombinant human IL-7 with an extended half-life (rhIL-7-hyFc) with CAR-NKTs increased their persistence and anti-tumor activity (42). Finally, co-expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 has been shown to polarize human NKTs to polyfunctional Th1 cells characterized by long-term persistence while decreasing expression of exhaustion markers (43). Co-expression of secreted or membrane-bound IL-12 in CAR-NKTs enhanced in vivo antitumor activity in xenogeneic tumor models beyond levels observed in cells co-expressing IL-15 (43). In our most recent study, we found that IL-18 co-expression in CAR-NKTs broadly reprograms NKT cell metabolism and boosts CAR-NKT antitumor activity in vivo without toxicity.

Role of transcription factors in CAR-NKTs.

In human CAR-Ts, the impact of modulating transcription factors associated with T cell differentiation and exhaustion has been well-studied (44). In murine NKTs, transcription factors such as PLZF, Gata3, RORγ-t, and T-bet have been shown to be essential for growth and differentiation (45). The impact of manipulating specific transcription factors in CAR-NKTs to modulate persistence, exhaustion, and metabolic fitness remains an area of active interest. We showed that CD62L expression in human NKTs characterizes a central-memory-like phenotype associated with superior persistence and anti-tumor activity in vivo (28) (Figure 1). We then identified the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) as a transcriptional driver of this central-memory phenotype in NKTs and showed that LEF1 co-expression in CAR-NKTs enhances in vitro proliferation and in vivo anti-tumor activity (46) (Figure 1). Of note, we also observed that IL-12 plays a critical role in influencing the NKT phenotype by increasing CD62L expression through upregulation of the transcription factor FOXO1 and by generating Th1-polarized cells with memory properties (43). To identify additional regulators of NKT functional fitness, we recently developed a limited CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen through which we identified PRDM1 as a negative regulator of CAR-NKT memory differentiation and effector function (47). Further, using patient data from the GINAKIT2 trial evaluating GD2.CAR-NKTs co-expressing IL-15 in relapsed/refractory NB, we discovered that the BTG anti-proliferation factor 1 (BTG1) drives hyporesponsiveness in exhausted NKTs and T cells and that knocking down BTG1 boosts GD2.CAR-NKT cell anti-tumor activity (9). Thus, there is a growing body of evidence showing that CAR-NKT antitumor activity and persistence can be enhanced by modulating the expression of transcriptional master regulators.

CAR-NKTs and early-stage clinical trials.

Adoptive transfers of ex vivo expanded either autologous or allogeneic NKTs without genetic manipulation have been explored in multiple early phase clinical studies in a variety of human malignancies (Table 2)(4858). These studies demonstrated safety of cellular products either alone or in combination with other treatment modalities. However, objective clinical responses are limited. Based on compelling preclinical data with NKTs engineered to express a CAR, we and others initiated clinical trials to evaluate the use of CAR-NKTs in human subjects in both autologous and allogeneic “off-the-shelf” settings (Table 2)(8,9,59,60). The development of clinical grade CAR-NKT products as well as the design of the Phase I clinical studies followed regulatory approval procedure previously developed for CAR-T cell products. GINAKIT2 is a dose-escalation phase I clinical study of autologous GD2.CAR-NKTs co-expressing IL-15 on which 12 pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory NB have been treated. Patients undergo lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. We have shown that GD2.CAR-NKTs are well tolerated with adverse events limited to mostly grade 1 and one case of grade 2 cytokine release syndrome. Interim results have yielded a 25% objective response rate (3/12) including two partial responses and one complete response, with two additional patients showing evidence of anti-tumor activity (9). The clinical study continues to enroll patients, and we recently reported the occurrence of a lethal adverse event in a patient who received 3×108 CAR-NKT/m2 (61). Lethal toxicity was associated with severe hyperleukocytosis and multi-organ deterioration attributed to leukostasis and extensive vascular occlusion confirmed by post-mortem autopsy. The observed hyperleukocytosis was not associated with insertional mutagenesis or any known genetic predisposition and was likely of multifactorial origin (61). Despite the small patient sample size, GINAKIT2 correlative studies identified a significant correlation between CAR-NKT expansion/persistence in vivo and clinical response. The study has also confirmed the critical role of NKT central-memory differentiation associated with stemness in predicting CAR-NKT expansion/persistence. Specifically, CAR-NKT expansion/persistence correlated with the percentage of CD62L expressing cells in the infused product (9). In the allogeneic “off-the-shelf” setting, we initiated the phase I ANCHOR trial (NCT03774654) in which allogeneic CD19.CAR-NKTs are administered to patients with relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies. We generated five lots of allogeneic CD19.CAR-NKTs co-expressing IL-15 and a small hairpin (sh)RNA targeting β2-microglobulin and CD74 to downregulate the MHC. To date, nine patients have been infused on three dose levels (1×107, 3×107, 1×108 CAR-NKTs/m2) without evidence of GvHD, and three patients have achieved complete responses (60). Additionally, there are currently several ongoing trials testing CD70.CAR-NKTs in patients with multiple types of solid tumors (NCT06394622, NCT06182735, NCT06728189), but safety and efficacy data from these studies have not yet been reported.

Table 2.

Clinical trials evaluating non-genetically modified and CAR-engineered NKTs in cancer patients.

Trial ID Indication Therapy Clinical response Toxicity Ref.
N/A Lung, head & neck cancer Autologous NKT-enriched PBMCs PR in 9/25 No DLT 48
N/A Melanoma Autologous NKTs SD in 6/9 No DLT 49
UMIN000000722 Head & neck carcinoma Autologous NKTs + αGalCer-pulsed APCs PR in 3/8 No DLT 50
UMIN000000852 Head & neck carcer Autologous NKTs + αGalCer-pulsed APCs PR in 5/10 No DLT 51
NCT02619058 Melanoma Autologous NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT02562963 Solid tumors Autologous NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT03198923 Non-small cell lung cancer Autologous NKTs + NK cells N/A N/A N/A
NCT03175679 Hepato-cellular carcinoma Autologous NKTs SD in 10/10 No DLT 52
NCT00909558 Solid tumors Autologous NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT03093688 Solid tumors Autologous NKTs + CD8 Ts + DCs SD in 3/3 after 4 cycles No DLT 53
NCT05962450 Hepato-cellular carcinoma Autologous NKTs + Regorafenib + anti-PD-1 N/A N/A N/A
NCT04011033 Hepato-cellular carcinoma Autologous NKTs + TAE/CE CR in 5/27 1/27 grade 3 AE 54
NCT07055568 Pancreatic cancer Allogeneic NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT04754100 Multiple myeloma and solid tumors Allogeneic NKTs + anti-PD-1 N/A No DLT 55
RCT2033200116 Head & neck cancer Allogeneic iPS-NKTs SD in 5/10 DLT at higher dose level 56
NCT05108623 Solid tumors Allogeneic NKTs + anti-PD-1 PR in 1/29 No DLT 57
NCT06251973 Gastro-esophageal cancer Allogeneic NKTs + CTLA-4 inhibitor + anti-PD-1 + anti-VEGF N/A N/A 58
NCT06394622 Solid tumors Autologous CD70.CAR NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT06182735 Renal cell carcinoma Autologous CD70.CAR NKTs PR in 2/4 No DLT 59
NCT06728189 Solid tumors Autologous CD70.CAR NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT06870279 Renal cell carcinoma Autologous CD70.CAR NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT03294954 Neuroblastoma Autologous GD2.CAR NKTs CR in 1/12, PR in 2/12 No DLT 8,9
NCT04814004 B cell malignancies Autologous CD19.CAR.IL15 NKTs N/A N/A N/A
NCT03774654 B cell malignancies Allogeneic CD19.CAR.IL15 NKTs CR in 3/9 No DLT or GvHD 60
NCT04814004 B cell malignancies Allogeneic CD19.CAR.IL15 NKTs N/A N/A N/A

AE, adverse event. APC, antigen-presenting cell. CE, chemoembolization. CR, complete response. DC, dendritic cells.

DLT, dose-limiting toxicity. GvHD, graft versus host disease. iPS, induced pluripotent stem cell. N/A, not available.

PR, partial response. SD, stable disease. TAE, transarterial embolization.

Modeling CAR-NKTs in the tumor microenvironment

It is generally accepted that the intrinsic immunosuppressive characteristics of the TME constitute a significant obstacle to exploiting the full potential of tumor-specific adoptive cell therapies. However, the complexity of the TME is poorly recapitulated in commonly used immunodeficient mouse models, which provide an accurate context for evaluating the effector function and persistence of engineered human immune cells but do not support interrogation of how adoptively transferred cells interact with an intact immune system or elements of the TME. A more accurate approach to studying the potential interactions of CAR-engineered immune cells with the TME is represented by the development of syngeneic tumor models. A study utilizing an allogeneic murine B cell lymphoma model, for example, demonstrated that murine CD19.CAR-NKTs showed superior anti-tumor activity compared to CAR-Ts through cross-priming of host CD8+ T cells (62). In another study, murine NKTs engineered to express a tumor-specific αβTCR outperformed αβTCR-T cells, demonstrating robust control of multiple solid tumor types due to better tumor infiltration, cross-priming of host T cells, and CD1d-dependent modulation of the TME (63). Similarly, we recently reported that CAR-NKTs are superior to CAR-Ts in syngeneic models of melanoma, colon, and ovarian cancer (64). We showed that this can be explained mechanistically as CAR-NKTs directly target tumor cells and CD1d+ pro-tumoral macrophages while sparing M1-like macrophages and that they transactivate endogenous T cell responses via enhanced epitope spreading mediated by CD1d+ dendritic cell activation (64) (Figure 1). Another study assessed the antitumor effects of CAR-Ts, CAR-NKTs, CAR-NKs, and macrophages in a syngeneic glioma mouse model (65). CAR-NKTs and CAR-Ts showed similar antitumor effects, partly attributed to the “immune-cold” characteristics of this glioma model. Interestingly, the combination of CAR-Ts and CAR-NKTs enhanced tumor control, but mechanistic studies are needed to better dissect the crosstalk between these cells in the context of “immune-cold” tumors. Beyond syngeneic murine tumor models, results from a canine animal model used to evaluate unedited allogeneic NKTs showed that enrichment of central-memory signature and telomerase-related gene expression in NKT products infused into animals represent favorable biomarkers correlating with superior persistence in MHC-mismatched recipients (66). This canine platform offers a valuable alternative to murine syngeneic models for evaluating engineered NKTs in a translational context. These studies underscore the importance of using immunocompetent animal models for preclinical evaluation of ex vivo-expanded and engineered NKTs. Further, the indirect antitumor effects mediated by CAR-NKTs such as modulation of the TME and activation of endogenous immune responses highlight their potential for clinical applications in solid tumors.

Combination of CAR-NKTs with other agents

While adoptive transfer of ex vivo-engineered CAR-Ts, CAR-NKTs, and CAR-NKs has generated clinical activity in patients, the limited durability of these responses is of concern and combination therapies may be needed to improve their length.

Combination of CAR-NKTs with immune checkpoint blockade.

Chronic antigen stimulation causes CAR-T cell dysfunction and exhaustion, leading to therapy failure in patients (6769). To counteract this effect, CAR-Ts are being combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in both pre-clinical models and early-phase trials (7073). We observed that GD2.CAR-NKTs isolated from GINAKIT2 patients express PD1 and TIM3, suggesting that adoptively transferred CAR-NKTs may undergo exhaustion (9). Our syngeneic tumor models recapitulated this observation showing that CAR-NKTs upregulate PD1 in the TME, especially in the context of high tumor burden (64). In this model, combination with PD-1 blockade enhanced the antitumor effects of CAR-NKTs (64). Targeting PD-L1 has also been proven to promote Th1 cytokine release, boost cytotoxicity, and enhance antitumor immunity via activation of NKTs (74). These studies provide a strong rationale for combining CAR-NKTs with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, additional studies are needed to evaluate the potential utility of other available checkpoint inhibitors that block LAG3, TIM3, and TIGIT to determine the optimal agent to synergize with CAR-NKTs in patients.

Combination with CD1d “regulators.”

The level of CD1d expression in target cells affects how NKTs recognize CD1d-expressing cells and mediate cytotoxicity (64,75). CD1d is expressed by monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, B lymphocytes, and thymocytes (76,77). Epithelial cells, adipocytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells have also been reported to express CD1d (78). Some human malignancies such as multiple myeloma, glioblastoma, medulloblastoma and lymphoma (7982) are reported to express CD1d, and CD1d expression in tumor cells can be epigenetically modulated by histone deacetylase inhibitors or retinoic acid (29,83). Based on this evidence, pharmacologic agents that induce CD1d upregulation in tumor cells may promote dual-targeting of tumor cells by CAR-NKTs, reducing the risk of tumor escape due to antigen loss. For example, the RARα ligand all-trans retinoic acid has been reported to induce CD1d upregulation in chronic lymphocytic B cell leukemia (29,84). This highlights the potential of using CD1d modulators to enhance the effectiveness of CAR-NKT-based immunotherapies.

Combination with NKT cell agonists.

We showed that in vivo expansion and persistence of adoptively transferred CAR-NKTs correlate with anti-tumor activity in NB patients (9). Therefore, strategies to boost CAR-NKT in vivo persistence using NKT-specific antigens could potentially improve anti-tumor activity. Administration of antigen presenting cells pulsed with the NKT ligand αGalCer in patients with non-small cell lung cancer was shown to be safe and increased the number of circulating NKTs (85). Similarly, irradiated tumor cells or microparticles used to deliver αGalCer increased circulating NKT numbers (86,87). However, αGalCer monotherapy and administration of dendritic cells pulsed with αGalCer have generated limited anti-tumor activity in patients (51,88,89). Combining αGalCer-loaded microparticles with CAR-NKTs or αβTCR-engineered NKTs was shown to result in superior antitumor activity compared to engineered NKTs alone (20,64). Synthetic NKT ligands including ABX196 and 7DW8–5 have also been shown to safely promote NKT activation and expansion and are currently being investigated in phase I clinical studies (90,91). This evidence underscores the potential benefits of combining CAR-NKTs with NKT agonists to enhance persistence and therapeutic efficacy.

Combination with other agents.

In addition to pharmacologic agents, other immunomodulatory agents with broader immune effects have been shown to directly or indirectly improve NKT cell functions. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide increases NKT expansion in combination with αGalCer in both healthy donors and patients with multiple myeloma (92,93). Armed oncolytic viruses that release IL-21 have been shown to synergize with NKTs in a humanized NSG mouse model of small cell lung cancer (94). Additionally, oncolytic viruses targeting PGE2 have been shown to reduce immunosuppression in the TME, in turn improving the trafficking of NKTs to tumor sites (95). Collectively, this evidence indicates that CAR-NKTs can be combined with multiple therapeutic modalities to safely enhance their therapeutic effects.

Conclusions and future directions

NKTs have unique properties that can be harnessed for cellular therapy applications, giving them an edge over conventional T cells. In particular, their ability to target CD1d+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells and to transactivate CD8+ T cell responses situate NKTs as promising candidates for solid tumor cellular immunotherapy, given that modulation of the TME and epitope spreading are central to the elimination of solid tumors. CAR-NKTs have produced promising clinical results in ongoing phase 1 trials, but more work is needed to improve their persistence in patients and the durability of responses. While IL-15 co-expression was confirmed to be important for CAR-NKT expansion and persistence in patients, other cytokines have shown even greater potential in pre-clinical studies and could be tested in the clinical setting. Therapeutic combinations with other agents that can counter CAR-NKT exhaustion and boost expansion could be rapidly tested in the clinic with existing CAR-NKTs co-expressing IL-15. Finally, since NKTs naturally do not cause alloreactivity, they represent an appealing platform for allogeneic “off-the-shelf” products, and early clinical data seem to support their safety profile. Further, the unique possibility of stimulating NKTs in vivo using NKT agonists could be used to enhance persistence in both autologous and allogeneic settings. In conclusion, NKTs are a versatile cellular immunotherapy platform with innate antitumor properties and minimal alloreactivity.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the NIH, National Cancer Institute grants R01-CA243543 (G.D), R01-CA262250 (L.S.M). X.Z. is supported by the Chinese for Medical Research, Beijing.

Footnotes

Competing Interests Statement

G.D. serves in the SAB of NanoCells, Estrella, Arovella and Outspace Bio. G.D is cofounder of Persistence Bio. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

References

  • 1.Fuca G, Reppel L, Landoni E, Savoldo B, Dotti G. Enhancing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Efficacy in Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11):2444–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Flugel CL, Majzner RG, Krenciute G, Dotti G, Riddell SR, Wagner DL, et al. Overcoming on-target, off-tumour toxicity of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023;20(1):49–62 doi 10.1038/s41571-022-00704-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rafiq S, Hackett CS, Brentjens RJ. Engineering strategies to overcome the current roadblocks in CAR T cell therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020;17(3):147–67 doi 10.1038/s41571-019-0297-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, Macapinlac HA, Thompson P, Basar R, et al. Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors. The New England journal of medicine 2020;382(6):545–53 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1910607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Myers JA, Miller JS. Exploring the NK cell platform for cancer immunotherapy. Nature reviews Clinical oncology 2021;18(2):85–100 doi 10.1038/s41571-020-0426-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rischer M, Pscherer S, Duwe S, Vormoor J, Jürgens H, Rossig C. Human gammadelta T cells as mediators of chimaeric-receptor redirected anti-tumour immunity. British journal of haematology 2004;126(4):583–92 doi 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05077.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Capsomidis A, Benthall G, Van Acker HH, Fisher J, Kramer AM, Abeln Z, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered Human Gamma Delta T Cells: Enhanced Cytotoxicity with Retention of Cross Presentation. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2018;26(2):354–65 doi 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heczey A, Courtney AN, Montalbano A, Robinson S, Liu K, Li M, et al. Anti-GD2 CAR-NKT cells in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: an interim analysis. NatMed 2020;26(11):1686–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heczey A, Xu X, Courtney AN, Tian G, Barragan GA, Guo L, et al. Anti-GD2 CAR-NKT cells in relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: updated phase 1 trial interim results. NatMed 2023;29(6):1379–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bendelac A, Savage PB, Teyton L. The biology of NKT cells. Annual review of immunology 2007;25:297–336 doi 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brossay L, Chioda M, Burdin N, Koezuka Y, Casorati G, Dellabona P, et al. CD1d-mediated recognition of an alpha-galactosylceramide by natural killer T cells is highly conserved through mammalian evolution. The Journal of experimental medicine 1998;188(8):1521–8 doi 10.1084/jem.188.8.1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kronenberg M, Gapin L. The unconventional lifestyle of NKT cells. NatRevImmunol 2002;2(8):557–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schneiders FL, de Bruin RC, van den Eertwegh AJ, Scheper RJ, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH, et al. Circulating invariant natural killer T-cell numbers predict outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: updated analysis with 10-year follow-up. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2012;30(5):567–70 doi 10.1200/jco.2011.38.8819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Metelitsa LS, Wu HW, Wang H, Yang Y, Warsi Z, Asgharzadeh S, et al. Natural killer T cells infiltrate neuroblastomas expressing the chemokine CCL2. The Journal of experimental medicine 2004;199(9):1213–21 doi 10.1084/jem.20031462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tachibana T, Onodera H, Tsuruyama T, Mori A, Nagayama S, Hiai H, et al. Increased intratumor Valpha24-positive natural killer T cells: a prognostic factor for primary colorectal carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11(20):7322–7 doi 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-05-0877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu D, Song L, Wei J, Courtney AN, Gao X, Marinova E, et al. IL-15 protects NKT cells from inhibition by tumor-associated macrophages and enhances antimetastatic activity. JClinInvest 2012;122(6):2221–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Song L, Asgharzadeh S, Salo J, Engell K, Wu HW, Sposto R, et al. Valpha24-invariant NKT cells mediate antitumor activity via killing of tumor-associated macrophages. J Clin Invest 2009;119(6):1524–36 doi 10.1172/jci37869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gorini F, Azzimonti L, Delfanti G, Scarfò L, Scielzo C, Bertilaccio MT, et al. Invariant NKT cells contribute to chronic lymphocytic leukemia surveillance and prognosis. Blood 2017;129(26):3440–51 doi 10.1182/blood-2016-11-751065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cortesi F, Delfanti G, Grilli A, Calcinotto A, Gorini F, Pucci F, et al. Bimodal CD40/Fas-Dependent Crosstalk between iNKT Cells and Tumor-Associated Macrophages Impairs Prostate Cancer Progression. Cell Reports 2018;22(11):3006–20 doi 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Delfanti G, Cortesi F, Perini A, Antonini G, Azzimonti L, de Lalla C, et al. TCR-engineered iNKT cells induce robust antitumor response by dual targeting cancer and suppressive myeloid cells. 2022;7(74):eabn6563 doi doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abn6563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gebremeskel S, Clattenburg DR, Slauenwhite D, Lobert L, Johnston B. Natural killer T cell activation overcomes immunosuppression to enhance clearance of postsurgical breast cancer metastasis in mice. Oncoimmunology 2015;4(3):e995562 doi 10.1080/2162402x.2014.995562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.De Santo C, Salio M, Masri SH, Lee LY, Dong T, Speak AO, et al. Invariant NKT cells reduce the immunosuppressive activity of influenza A virus-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice and humans. J Clin Invest 2008;118(12):4036–48 doi 10.1172/jci36264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ko HJ, Lee JM, Kim YJ, Kim YS, Lee KA, Kang CY. Immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells can be converted into immunogenic APCs with the help of activated NKT cells: an alternative cell-based antitumor vaccine. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2009;182(4):1818–28 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.0802430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chaidos A, Patterson S, Szydlo R, Chaudhry MS, Dazzi F, Kanfer E, et al. Graft invariant natural killer T-cell dose predicts risk of acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012;119(21):5030–6 doi 10.1182/blood-2011-11-389304 %J Blood. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rubio MT, Bouillié M, Bouazza N, Coman T, Trebeden-Nègre H, Gomez A, et al. Pre-transplant donor CD4(−) invariant NKT cell expansion capacity predicts the occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease. Leukemia 2017;31(4):903–12 doi 10.1038/leu.2016.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schneidawind D, Baker J, Pierini A, Buechele C, Luong RH, Meyer EH, et al. Third-party CD4+ invariant natural killer T cells protect from murine GVHD lethality. Blood 2015;125(22):3491–500 doi 10.1182/blood-2014-11-612762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Heczey A, Liu D, Tian G, Courtney AN, Wei J, Marinova E, et al. Invariant NKT cells with chimeric antigen receptor provide a novel platform for safe and effective cancer immunotherapy. Blood 2014;124(18):2824–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tian G, Courtney AN, Jena B, Heczey A, Liu D, Marinova E, et al. CD62L+ NKT cells have prolonged persistence and antitumor activity in vivo. J Clin Invest 2016;126(6):2341–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rotolo A, Caputo VS, Holubova M, Baxan N, Dubois O, Chaudhry MS, et al. Enhanced Anti-lymphoma Activity of CAR19-iNKT Cells Underpinned by Dual CD19 and CD1d Targeting. Cancer Cell 2018;34(4):596–610.e11 doi 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Poels R, Drent E, Lameris R, Katsarou A, Themeli M, van der Vliet HJ, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Invariant Natural Killer T Cells Modified with CD38 or BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Multiple Myeloma. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(3) doi 10.3390/ijms22031096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rowan AG, Ponnusamy K, Ren H, Taylor GP, Cook LBM, Karadimitris A. CAR-iNKT cells targeting clonal TCRVbeta chains as a precise strategy to treat T cell lymphoma. Front Immunol 2023;14:1118681 doi 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1118681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li YR, Zhou Y, Yu J, Zhu Y, Lee D, Zhu E, et al. Engineering allorejection-resistant CAR-NKT cells from hematopoietic stem cells for off-the-shelf cancer immunotherapy. MolTher 2024;32(6):1849–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. NEnglJMed 2014;371(16):1507–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hoyos V, Savoldo B, Quintarelli C, Mahendravada A, Zhang M, Vera J, et al. Engineering CD19-specific T lymphocytes with interleukin-15 and a suicide gene to enhance their anti-lymphoma/leukemia effects and safety. Leukemia 2010;24(6):1160–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu E, Tong Y, Dotti G, Shaim H, Savoldo B, Mukherjee M, et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia 2018;32(2):520–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen Y, Sun C, Landoni E, Metelitsa L, Dotti G, Savoldo B. Eradication of Neuroblastoma by T Cells Redirected with an Optimized GD2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor and Interleukin-15. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(9):2915–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Steffin D, Ghatwai N, Montalbano A, Rathi P, Courtney AN, Arnett AB, et al. Interleukin-15-armoured GPC3 CAR T cells for patients with solid cancers. Nature 2025;637(8047):940–6 doi 10.1038/s41586-024-08261-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baev DV, Peng XH, Song L, Barnhart JR, Crooks GM, Weinberg KI, et al. Distinct homeostatic requirements of CD4+ and CD4− subsets of Valpha24-invariant natural killer T cells in humans. Blood 2004;104(13):4150–6 doi 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xu X, Huang W, Heczey A, Liu D, Guo L, Wood M, et al. NKT Cells Coexpressing a GD2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor and IL15 Show Enhanced In Vivo Persistence and Antitumor Activity against Neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(23):7126–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ngai H, Tian G, Courtney AN, Ravari SB, Guo L, Liu B, et al. IL-21 Selectively Protects CD62L(+) NKT Cells and Enhances Their Effector Functions for Adoptive Immunotherapy. J Immunol 2018;201(7):2141–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu Y, Dang Y, Zhang C, Liu L, Cai W, Li L, et al. IL-21-armored B7H3 CAR-iNKT cells exert potent antitumor effects. iScience 2024;27(1):108597 doi 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.O’Neal J, Cooper ML, Ritchey JK, Gladney S, Niswonger J, Gonzalez LS, et al. Anti-myeloma efficacy of CAR-iNKT is enhanced with a long-acting IL-7, rhIL-7-hyFc. Blood Adv 2023;7(20):6009–22 doi 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Landoni E, Woodcock MG, Barragan G, Casirati G, Cinella V, Stucchi S, et al. IL-12 reprograms CAR-expressing natural killer T cells to long-lived Th1-polarized cells with potent antitumor activity. NatCommun 2024;15(1):89. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lynn RC, Weber EW, Sotillo E, Gennert D, Xu P, Good Z, et al. c-Jun overexpression in CAR T cells induces exhaustion resistance. Nature 2019;576(7786):293–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim EY, Lynch L, Brennan PJ, Cohen NR, Brenner MB. The transcriptional programs of iNKT cells. SeminImmunol 2015;27(1):26–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ngai H, Barragan GA, Tian G, Balzeau JC, Zhang C, Courtney AN, et al. LEF1 Drives a Central Memory Program and Supports Antitumor Activity of Natural Killer T Cells. Cancer ImmunolRes 2023;11(2):171–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tian G, Barragan GA, Yu H, Martinez-Amador C, Adaikkalavan A, Rios X, et al. PRDM1 Is a Key Regulator of the NKT-cell Central Memory Program and Effector Function. Cancer Immunol Res 2025;13(4):577–90 doi 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-24-0259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Motohashi S, Okamoto Y, Yoshino I, Nakayama T. Anti-tumor immune responses induced by iNKT cell-based immunotherapy for lung cancer and head and neck cancer. Clin Immunol 2011;140(2):167–76 doi 10.1016/j.clim.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Exley MA, Friedlander P, Alatrakchi N, Vriend L, Yue S, Sasada T, et al. Adoptive Transfer of Invariant NKT Cells as Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma: A Phase I Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(14):3510–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kunii N, Horiguchi S, Motohashi S, Yamamoto H, Ueno N, Yamamoto S, et al. Combination therapy of in vitro-expanded natural killer T cells and alpha-galactosylceramide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells in patients with recurrent head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2009;100(6):1092–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yamasaki K, Horiguchi S, Kurosaki M, Kunii N, Nagato K, Hanaoka H, et al. Induction of NKT cell-specific immune responses in cancer tissues after NKT cell-targeted adoptive immunotherapy. Clin Immunol 2011;138(3):255–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gao Y, Guo J, Bao X, Xiong F, Ma Y, Tan B, et al. Adoptive Transfer of Autologous Invariant Natural Killer T Cells as Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase I Clinical Trial. Oncologist 2021;26(11):e1919–e30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cheng X, Wang J, Qiu C, Jin Y, Xia B, Qin R, et al. Feasibility of iNKT cell and PD-1+CD8+ T cell-based immunotherapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial. Clin Immunol 2022;238:108992 doi 10.1016/j.clim.2022.108992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guo J, Bao X, Liu F, Guo J, Wu Y, Xiong F, et al. Efficacy of Invariant Natural Killer T Cell Infusion Plus Transarterial Embolization vs Transarterial Embolization Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2023;10:1379–88 doi 10.2147/JHC.S416933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stevens DMC, Garmezy B, Hamm J, Carneiro B, Wilky B, et al. Phase I studies of AgenT-797, a novel allogeneic invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cell therapy, for the treatment of patients with solid tumors or multiple myeloma. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 2022;10:647 doi doi 10.1136/jitc-2022-SITC2022.0647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Biotherapeutics B Topline Results of Phase I Clinical Trial of iPS-NKT in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Head and Neck Cancer. 2024.
  • 57.Carneiro BGB, Hamm JT, Sanborn RE, Wise-Draper T, Khoueiry AE-, et al. Phase 1 clinical update of allogeneic invariant natural killer T cells (iNKTs), agenT-797, alone or in combination with pembrolizumab or nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Research 2023;83:CT275 doi CT275-CT doi 10.1158/1538-7445.Am2023-ct275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cytryn SL EP SJ, Hieronymi S, Segal M, Tsai C, Mcgriskin R, Yaqubie A, Lam J, Maron S, Ilson D, Ku G, Janjigian Y.. Biomarker Analysis From a Phase II Study of AgenT-797 (invariant natural killer T cells) with Botensilimab (Fc-enhanced CTLA-4 inhibitor) and Balstilimab (anti-PD-1) in PD-1 Refractory Gastroesophageal Cancer.. 2025; Los Angeles, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Genetics C Cure Genetics Announced Promising Safety and Efficacy Data of CAR-NKT Product CGC729 for RCC at ASGCT 2024 Suzhou, China. 2024.
  • 60.Ramos CA CA, Lulla PD, Hill LC, Kamble RT, Carrum G, et al. Off-the-Shelf CD19-Specific CAR-NKT Cells in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Malignancies. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Official Publication of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy 2024 2024;30 doi doi 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.12.072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tian G, Courtney AN, Yu H, Bhar S, Xu X, Barragan GA, et al. Hyperleukocytosis in a neuroblastoma patient after treatment with natural killer T cells expressing a GD2-specific chimeric antigen receptor and IL-15. J Immunother Cancer 2025;13(1) doi 10.1136/jitc-2024-010156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Simonetta F, Lohmeyer JK, Hirai T, Maas-Bauer K, Alvarez M, Wenokur AS, et al. Allogeneic CAR Invariant Natural Killer T Cells Exert Potent Antitumor Effects through Host CD8 T-Cell Cross-Priming. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(21):6054–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Delfanti G, Cortesi F, Perini A, Antonini G, Azzimonti L, de LC, et al. TCR-engineered iNKT cells induce robust antitumor response by dual targeting cancer and suppressive myeloid cells. SciImmunol 2022;7(74):eabn6563. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhou X, Wang Y, Dou Z, Delfanti G, Tsahouridis O, Pellegry CM, et al. CAR-redirected natural killer T cells demonstrate superior antitumor activity to CAR-T cells through multimodal CD1d-dependent mechanisms. NatCancer 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hatae R, Watchmaker PB, Yamamichi A, Kyewalabye K, Okada K, Phyu S, et al. Comparative evaluation of CAR-expressing T-, NK-, NKT-cells, and macrophages in an immunocompetent mouse glioma model. Neurooncol Adv 2025;7(1):vdaf074 doi 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rotolo A, Whelan EC, Atherton MJ, Kulikovskaya I, Jarocha D, Fraietta JA, et al. Unedited allogeneic iNKT cells show extended persistence in MHC-mismatched canine recipients. Cell Rep Med 2023;4(10):101241 doi 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Scholler N, Perbost R, Locke FL, Jain MD, Turcan S, Danan C, et al. Tumor immune contexture is a determinant of anti-CD19 CAR T cell efficacy in large B cell lymphoma. Nat Med 2022;28(9):1872–82 doi 10.1038/s41591-022-01916-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nastoupil LJ, Jain MD, Feng L, Spiegel JY, Ghobadi A, Lin Y, et al. Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020;38(27):3119–28 doi 10.1200/jco.19.02104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jain MD, Zhao H, Wang X, Atkins R, Menges M, Reid K, et al. Tumor interferon signaling and suppressive myeloid cells are associated with CAR T-cell failure in large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2021;137(19):2621–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Grosser R, Cherkassky L, Chintala N, Adusumilli PS. Combination Immunotherapy with CAR T Cells and Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. Cancer cell 2019;36(5):471–82 doi 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.John LB, Devaud C, Duong CP, Yong CS, Beavis PA, Haynes NM, et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody therapy potently enhances the eradication of established tumors by gene-modified T cells. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2013;19(20):5636–46 doi 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-13-0458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chong EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Ambrose DE, Gonzalez V, Levine BL, et al. PD-1 blockade modulates chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells: refueling the CAR. Blood 2017;129(8):1039–41 doi 10.1182/blood-2016-09-738245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Heczey A, Louis CU, Savoldo B, Dakhova O, Durett A, Grilley B, et al. CAR T Cells Administered in Combination with Lymphodepletion and PD-1 Inhibition to Patients with Neuroblastoma. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2017;25(9):2214–24 doi 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kamata T, Suzuki A, Mise N, Ihara F, Takami M, Makita Y, et al. Blockade of programmed death-1/programmed death ligand pathway enhances the antitumor immunity of human invariant natural killer T cells. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII 2016;65(12):1477–89 doi 10.1007/s00262-016-1901-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Metelitsa LS. Anti-tumor potential of type-I NKT cells against CD1d-positive and CD1d-negative tumors in humans. ClinImmunol 2011;140(2):119–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chaudhry MS, Karadimitris A. Role and regulation of CD1d in normal and pathological B cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2014;193(10):4761–8 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1401805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Exley M, Garcia J, Wilson SB, Spada F, Gerdes D, Tahir SM, et al. CD1d structure and regulation on human thymocytes, peripheral blood T cells, B cells and monocytes. Immunology 2000;100(1):37–47 doi 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00001.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Canchis PW, Bhan AK, Landau SB, Yang L, Balk SP, Blumberg RS. Tissue distribution of the non-polymorphic major histocompatibility complex class I-like molecule, CD1d. Immunology 1993;80(4):561–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Haraguchi K, Takahashi T, Nakahara F, Matsumoto A, Kurokawa M, Ogawa S, et al. CD1d expression level in tumor cells is an important determinant for anti-tumor immunity by natural killer T cells. Leuk Lymphoma 2006;47(10):2218–23 doi 10.1080/10428190600682688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liu D, Song L, Brawley VS, Robison N, Wei J, Gao X, et al. Medulloblastoma expresses CD1d and can be targeted for immunotherapy with NKT cells. Clin Immunol 2013;149(1):55–64 doi 10.1016/j.clim.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hara A, Koyama-Nasu R, Takami M, Toyoda T, Aoki T, Ihara F, et al. CD1d expression in glioblastoma is a promising target for NKT cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021;70(5):1239–54 doi 10.1007/s00262-020-02742-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Spanoudakis E, Hu M, Naresh K, Terpos E, Melo V, Reid A, et al. Regulation of multiple myeloma survival and progression by CD1d. Blood 2009;113(11):2498–507 doi 10.1182/blood-2008-06-161281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yang PM, Lin PJ, Chen CC. CD1d induction in solid tumor cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors through inhibition of HDAC1/2 and activation of Sp1. Epigenetics 2012;7(4):390–9 doi 10.4161/epi.19373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Allan LL, Stax AM, Zheng D-J, Chung BK, Kozak FK, Tan R, et al. CD1d and CD1c Expression in Human B Cells Is Regulated by Activation and Retinoic Acid Receptor Signaling. The Journal of Immunology 2011;186(9):5261–72 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1003615 %J The Journal of Immunology. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Toyoda T, Kamata T, Tanaka K, Ihara F, Takami M, Suzuki H, et al. Phase II study of α-galactosylceramide-pulsed antigen-presenting cells in patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 2020;8(1) doi 10.1136/jitc-2019-000316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Shimizu K, Goto A, Fukui M, Taniguchi M, Fujii S-i. Tumor Cells Loaded with α-Galactosylceramide Induce Innate NKT and NK Cell-Dependent Resistance to Tumor Implantation in Mice1. The Journal of Immunology 2007;178(5):2853–61 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2853 %J The Journal of Immunology. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dölen Y, Kreutz M, Gileadi U, Tel J, Vasaturo A, van Dinther EA, et al. Co-delivery of PLGA encapsulated invariant NKT cell agonist with antigenic protein induce strong T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. Oncoimmunology 2016;5(1):e1068493 doi 10.1080/2162402x.2015.1068493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nieda M, Okai M, Tazbirkova A, Lin H, Yamaura A, Ide K, et al. Therapeutic activation of Valpha24+Vbeta11+ NKT cells in human subjects results in highly coordinated secondary activation of acquired and innate immunity. Blood 2004;103(2):383–9 doi 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chang DH, Osman K, Connolly J, Kukreja A, Krasovsky J, Pack M, et al. Sustained expansion of NKT cells and antigen-specific T cells after injection of alpha-galactosyl-ceramide loaded mature dendritic cells in cancer patients. J Exp Med 2005;201(9):1503–17 doi 10.1084/jem.20042592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Padte NN, Li X, Tsuji M, Vasan S. Clinical development of a novel CD1d-binding NKT cell ligand as a vaccine adjuvant. Clinical Immunology 2011;140(2):142–51 doi 10.1016/j.clim.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Tefit JN, Crabé S, Orlandini B, Nell H, Bendelac A, Deng S, et al. Efficacy of ABX196, a new NKT agonist, in prophylactic human vaccination. Vaccine 2014;32(46):6138–45 doi 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chang DH, Liu N, Klimek V, Hassoun H, Mazumder A, Nimer SD, et al. Enhancement of ligand-dependent activation of human natural killer T cells by lenalidomide: therapeutic implications. Blood 2006;108(2):618–21 doi 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Richter J, Neparidze N, Zhang L, Nair S, Monesmith T, Sundaram R, et al. Clinical regressions and broad immune activation following combination therapy targeting human NKT cells in myeloma. Blood 2013;121(3):423–30 doi 10.1182/blood-2012-06-435503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Chen T, Ding X, Liao Q, Gao N, Chen Y, Zhao C, et al. IL-21 arming potentiates the anti-tumor activity of an oncolytic vaccinia virus in monotherapy and combination therapy. 2021;9(1):e001647 doi 10.1136/jitc-2020-001647 %J Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hou W, Sampath P, Rojas Juan J, Thorne Steve H. Oncolytic Virus-Mediated Targeting of PGE2 in the Tumor Alters the Immune Status and Sensitizes Established and Resistant Tumors to Immunotherapy. Cancer cell 2016;30(1):108–19 doi 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES