Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 4;13:1672415. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1672415

Table 3.

Post hoc pairwise comparisons of 12-min run performance between assessment time points.

Variable Group Comparison Mean change SD of difference t-value p-value Hedges’ g (95% CI)
12-min run distance (m) Weekly feedback Baseline vs. mid-test 229.73 151.29 6.28 <0.001*** 1.58 (0.81, 2.32)
Baseline vs. post-test 358.00 249.78 7.10 <0.001*** 1.78 (0.95, 2.59)
Mid-test vs. post-test 128.27 182.99 5.03 <0.001*** 1.26 (0.57, 1.93)
Monthly feedback Baseline vs. mid-test 78.93 148.66 2.06 0.059 0.52 (−0.02, 1.04)
Baseline vs. post-test 249.33 170.02 5.68 <0.001*** 1.43 (0.70, 2.13)
Mid-test vs. post-test 170.40 131.75 5.01 <0.001*** 1.26 (0.57, 1.92)
12-min run score Weekly feedback Baseline vs. mid-test 23.00 14.37 6.20 <0.001*** 1.56 (0.79, 2.30)
Baseline vs. post-test 34.33 20.95 6.35 <0.001*** 1.60 (0.82, 2.35)
Mid-test vs. post-test 11.33 9.54 4.60 <0.001*** 1.16 (0.50, 1.79)
Monthly feedback Baseline vs. mid-test 5.33 14.33 1.44 0.171 0.36 (−0.15, 0.86)
Baseline vs. post-test 24.00 15.38 6.05 <0.001*** 1.52 (0.76, 2.25)
Mid-test vs. post-test 18.67 14.57 4.96 <0.001*** 1.25 (0.56, 1.91)

Data are presented as mean change ± SD of the difference. Simple effects were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests with Bonferroni correction. Effect sizes are reported as Hedges g with 95% confidence intervals. ***p < 0.001.