Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 17;15:40190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-23865-4

Table 13.

Summary of evaluation of security techniques in SIoT literature.

Ref. Domain Eval. type Tools used Lang. Metrics Result
185 Smart Grid Prototype Raspberry Pi 4B, Flask Python 3.11 Auth. time (ms) Inline graphic46 ms @256-bit; scales to 2048-bit
26 Healthcare (EHRs) Simulation Hyperledger Caliper, Solidity Solidity (Eth) Throughput, cost, utilization Secure, efficient; fixed signature size
25 Social IoT Simulation + Comparative Python stack (SciPy, SKO, etc.) Python Accuracy, latency, trust, privacy 95% acc., 280 Tx/s, 2.2s latency, high trust/privacy scores
186 Healthcare Simulation Smart Contracts, IPFS, Ethereum/Polygon Solidity Doc. verify time ( 2.2s), security, automation Fast, decentralized, tamper-proof verification
187 Access Control Prototype Hyperledger Fabric/Besu, CouchDB, AWS Solidity/Go Access latency, trust accuracy, cert verify time <200ms avg. access; fast onboarding, RSA+KYC used
188 Group Decision Simulation + Case Study MATLAB (custom) Not specified GCD, ICD, preference plots GCD Inline graphic in 2 rounds; outperforms baselines
189 Cloud Offloading Conceptual projection SSIM, C2C, RMSE, diff. ops Python, MATLAB Reduction ratio, recon. accuracy High data savings; generalizable across IoT types
190 Gateway Security Real Testbed Raspberry Pi-2, Mbed OS, Wireshark C MPT, TPT, DTLS overhead, Power Scales linearly; TPT Inline graphic 2.5s; Inline graphic3.8MB/thread; low power overhead; blocks illegal clients