Table 1.

Mean ratings of implementation determinants in the five identified subgroups and the total group

Determinant		RCCAN collaboration issues	RCCAN collaboration and organizational issues	Limited implementation issues	CP-client interaction issues	Indifferent attitudes towards implementation	ANOVA	Total
		n = 66, 11.7%	n = 28, 5.0%	n = 53, 9.4%	n = 212, 37.7%	n = 203, 36.1%	F-value	n = 562
Innovation	Compatibility	4.21	2.56	3.86	4.23	3.21	57.922***	3.75
	Observability	1.19	1.19	3.74	3.33	2.85	170.302***	2.83
	Procedural clarity	4.14	2.94	3.36	4.45	3.47	45.630***	3.88
	Relative priority	3.20	4.18	3.34	2.39	2.84	29.135***	2.83
Organization	Access to knowledge	3.96	2.56	3.96	4.04	2.95	47.662***	3.56
	Coordinator	2.87	2.09	3.21	3.63	2.90	20.017***	3.16
	Financial resources	3.31	1.34	3.80	3.85	3.06	36.015***	3.37
	Formal ratification	4.18	1.98	3.99	4.35	3.17	71.434***	3.76
	Partnership & connections	1.96	1.76	3.73	3.74	3.04	94.892***	3.17
	Time	4.01	2.10	4.30	4.11	2.96	70.760***	3.61
Professional	Client cooperation Childcheck	3.33	4.59	3.56	2.31	2.80	59.028***	2.85
	Client cooperation RCCAN	4.27	4.51	2.59	2.89	3.25	47.725***	3.24
	Communication skills	2.79	3.68	3.60	2.31	2.58	30.230***	2.66
	Descriptive norm	3.94	3.15	4.16	3.66	3.05	31.794***	3.50
	General skills	4.16	3.12	3.58	4.46	3.54	40.719***	3.94
	Implementation needs	2.16	3.11	2.72	2.28	3.27	35.298***	2.70
	Knowledge	3.85	2.23	3.21	4.23	2.94	90.140***	3.53
	Outcome expectations	2.26	1.88	3.60	3.35	2.85	35.298***	2.99
	Professional obligation	3.76	3.10	3.14	4.20	4.08	31.312***	3.95
	Relationship client	3.03	3.94	3.93	2.32	2.68	49.702***	2.77
	Routine	3.85	1.49	3.60	3.92	2.55	102.224***	3.27
	Social support	3.90	1.52	3.94	4.32	3.32	66.272***	3.73

Bold values represent the lowest value for each determinant or a value lower than 2.50: Italic values represent the highest value for each determinant

RCCAN Reporting Center for Child Abuse and Neglect, CP Care Professional

*** = p<0.001