Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2005 Jul 21;47(2):307–320. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.006

Table 1.

Strategy effects. Cells showing a significant effect of strategy (three-way ANOVA, p<0.05), IS, or choice (i.e., saccade direction). Both monkeys, combined. Task periods are defined in Experimental Procedures and illustrated in Fig. 1A. Top three rows: Numbers (and percentages of N, bottom row) of neurons with a significant main effect of each row’s factor. Fourth row: numbers (and percentages) of neurons with either main or interactive effects involving strategy. Suppl. Table 5 shows these data by monkey and the specific interactive terms, and Suppl. Fig. 2 illustrated these data.

Factors IS1 IS2 RMT Pre-reward Post-reward
Strategy 145 (16%) 152 (20%) 89 (12%) 136 (16%) 113 (13%)
IS 105 (12%) 82 (11%) 72 (9%) 53 (6%) 56 (6%)
Choice 156 (17%) 141 (18%) 129 (17%) 209 (25%) 122 (14%)
Strategy, incl. interactive 372 (41%) 288 (38%) 263 (34%) 309 (37%) 264 (30%)
N 907 766 765 825 867