Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
. 2025 Nov 13;19(1):wraf240. doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wraf240

Strict gut symbiont specificity in Coreoidea insects governed by interspecies competition within Caballeronia strains

Gaëlle Lextrait 1, Srotoswini Joardar 2,3,4, Raynald Cossard 5, Yoshitomo Kikuchi 6, Tsubasa Ohbayashi 7,8,, Peter Mergaert 9,
PMCID: PMC12632191  PMID: 41230826

Abstract

Host-bacteria symbioses are specific and transgenerationaly stable. In hosts that acquire their symbionts from the environment, selective mechanisms are required to identify beneficial partners among environmental microorganisms. In Coreoidea stinkbugs, which house environmentally acquired symbionts in the midgut, bacterial competition shapes symbiont specificity whereby Caballeronia strains consistently outcompete other bacteria. Here, we show that competition within the gut also occurs among Caballeronia strains themselves, driving specificity at a finer taxonomic scale. The stinkbugs Riptortus pedestris and Coreus marginatus, when reared on the same soil sample, preferentially selected for α- and β-subclade Caballeronia, respectively. In a gnotobiotic infection system, representative strains from the α-, β-, and γ-subclades can independently colonize the midgut of both insect species in monoculture. However, in pairwise co-culture infections, each host exhibits selectivity for either α- or β-subclade strains, consistent with patterns observed in the soil inoculation experiment. In R. pedestris, we further find that both priority effects and displacement mechanisms shape interspecies competition outcomes. At the molecular level, metabolic capabilities, resistance to antimicrobial peptides, and chemotactic behavior determine symbiont competitive success. In R. pedestris, the reproductive fitness benefits conferred by the symbiosis align with the observed strain specificity in the tested strain panel, suggesting a functional link between symbiont selection and host fitness, despite these processes occurring at distinct stages of the symbiotic relationship. Our findings highlight that the gut in Coreoidea species constitutes a multifactorial, species-specific selective environment that contributes to the colonization of the symbiotic midgut region by the best-adapted Caballeronia strain.

Keywords: bacteria-bacteria competition, insect-bacteria interactions, gut symbiosis, Riptortus pedestris, Coreus marginatus, Caballeronia, chemotaxis, antimicrobial peptides, metabolic capacity

Introduction

Since their early evolutionary history, insects have developed heritable interactions with a wide range of microorganisms [1, 2]. These symbionts have expanded the repertoire of capabilities in insects and thereby contributed to their ecological success [3, 4]. To maintain beneficial partnerships, insects have evolved mechanisms that ensure reliable symbiont acquisition and partner fidelity. Most insect symbioses are stably maintained through vertical transmission, passing symbionts from parent to offspring [1, 2]. However, some insects acquire their symbionts from the environment. In such cases, each symbiont-free hatchling must identify and selectively recruit suitable symbionts but avoid harmful or non-cooperative microorganisms.

Partner choice in environmentally transmitted symbioses often involves molecular signaling between host and symbiont, as seen in well-studied systems like rhizobia-legume and Aliivibrio fischeri–squid interactions [5]. Insects from the infraorder Pentatomomorpha provide models to study mechanisms governing the establishment of symbiosis by environmental transmission. Many phytophagous Pentatomomorpha have a midgut with a distinctive architecture, which harbors dense populations of a single bacterial species in the crypts of a specialized, posterior gut region, called M4 [6]. Although species from the Pentatomoidea superfamily typically transmit their γ-proteobacterial M4 crypt symbionts vertically, members of the superfamilies Lygaeoidea, Coreoidea, and the family Largidae (within the Pyrrhocoroidea superfamily) harbor environmentally acquired species of the Burkholderia s.l. (sensu lato) that includes the genera Caballeronia, Paraburkholderia, and Burkholderia. The association of the Pentatomomorpha insects with crypt symbionts increases their fitness by enhancing developmental rate and body size, survival, reproduction, immunity, and capacity for degradation of xenobiotics [7–19].

In the bean bug Riptortus pedestris, belonging to the Coreoidea, Caballeronia dominates the gut microbiota with >95% prevalence [7]. The gut features a constricted region (CR) between midgut sections M3 and M4 that acts as a selective barrier, permitting only motile and compatible bacteria, such as Caballeronia insecticola, to colonize the crypts [20]. This gate closes shortly after initial colonization, preventing late-arriving bacteria from entering [21]. Within the crypts, bacterial competition further filters symbionts, favoring strains with robust metabolic capabilities and resistance to host-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [22–25].

Recent evidence suggests that Coreoidea species may exhibit distinct Caballeronia subclade-level specificity, possibly shaped by host-symbiont coevolution or alternatively, by environmental availability of Caballeronia subclades in soils of different geographic origin [15]. For instance, R. pedestris typically associates with Caballeronia of the α-subclade, while the western conifer seed bug Leptoglossus occidentalis harbors β- or δ-subclade species across global populations. In the dock bug Coreus marginatus, β-subclade associations dominate in Europe, while Japanese populations also carry δ-subclade symbionts (originally placed in the α-subclade, Fig. 1A) [12].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of gut symbionts of R. pedestris and C. marginatus. (A) Maximum-likelihood tree of 1285 aligned nucleotide sites of the 16S rRNA gene. Numbers at the tree nodes indicate bootstrap values (%) with 1000 replicates and bootstrap values of more than 50 are shown. Accession numbers in the DNA database (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank) are shown in square brackets. Gut symbionts of R. pedestris (Rp) and C. marginatus (Cm) identified in the soil inoculation test are shown in blue. Caballeronia strains used in insect inoculation tests are shown in red. The δ-subclade is also known as “Coreoidea-clade” [15]. GS: Gut symbiont. Scale bar refers to a phylogenetic distance of 0.01 nucleotide substitutions per site. (B) Relative abundance of α-, β-, and γ-Caballeronia, Paraburkholderia, and Pandoraea among gut symbionts of R. pedestris and C. marginatus in the soil inoculation test. The number of investigated insects is shown on top of the graphs, and the corresponding OTUs and their counts are provided in Supplementary Fig. S2 and Supplementary Table S2.

In this study, we experimentally tested whether R. pedestris and C. marginatus distinguish among Caballeronia subclades. First, we analyzed symbiont associations in both insects reared on the same soil. Next, we used gnotobiotic mono- and co-inoculations to assess host preferences for α-, β-, and γ-subclade strains. Finally, we identified key molecular pathways in α-subclade C. insecticola that promote its competitive success during gut colonization.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing and infection with symbionts

The R. pedestris TKS1 inbred line and C. marginatus captured in two distinct locations in Gif-sur-Yvette (48°42′17.0″N 2°07′42.2″E) and Bures-sur-Yvette (48°41′52.4″N 2°09′09.3″E), France were reared in the laboratory as described before [12, 26]. Bacteria are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and were cultured as described [24].

For the soil inoculation test, samples of soil from the CNRS campus (48°42′17.0″N 2°07′42.2″E), Gif-sur-Yvette, France were collected in 2019 and sieved with a 2 mm sieve to remove debris. One gram of soil was wetted with 10 ml of water and applied to a cotton pad, which was used as an inoculum for second instar nymphs that are most perceptive to infection by crypt symbionts [27]. Insects were reared until reaching the third instar (5 days postinfection (dpi) for R. pedestris and 7 dpi for C. marginatus) and their M4 midgut regions were harvested by dissection. DNA was extracted from M4 samples and a clone library analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was performed as previously described [12]. Multiple alignment of the sequences was performed to assign them to operational taxonomical units (OTU) and to construct a molecular phylogenetic tree as described in the Supplementary Information. The nucleotide sequence data of the 16S rRNA gene obtained in the present study have been deposited in the DDBJ public database with the accession numbers LC816739-LC817101.

In the gnotobiotic infection system, a defined bacterium or set of bacteria is provided to the insects. Inoculation of insects by single fluorescently labeled strains (Supplementary Table S1) or by equally abundant paired strains, each labeled with a different fluorescent protein (Supplementary Table S1), was done as previously by oral administration via cotton pads, wetted with the bacterial suspension [24]. Inoculated second instar nymphs of R. pedestris or C. marginatus were reared until third instar as above and the symbiont colonization status was assessed in dissected guts by fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry as described earlier [24]. In pairwise competitions, a competition index (CI) was calculated from the flow cytometry quantification of the competing strains as the ratio of a tested Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)-strain to a mScarlet-I-strain, normalized by the ratio of the inoculum. Statistical analysis, using a Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn post hoc test, and Benjamini–Hochberg correction, was performed with RStudio [28].

For fitness measurements in R. pedestris, insects were infected as described above with different Caballeronia strains and bacteria-free aposymbiotic (apo) insects were obtained by omitting bacteria in the drinking water. Survival rate and developmental time to reach adulthood were reported by daily observation. Morphological parameters were measured on acetone-dehydrated and air-dried 1 day old adults. Egg production in 1 week was counted for individual females each placed together with two males in a container as described before [29]. Statistical analysis, using a Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn post hoc test, and Benjamini–Hochberg correction, was performed with RStudio [28].

Phenotypic characterization of Caballeronia strains

To measure the velocity of the different strains in liquid Yeast Glucose (YG) medium, time-lapse videos of the bacteria’s movement were recorded using Leica DMI6000 B Inverted Research Microscope (Leica Camera AG, Germany). The tracking and analysis of the motility was done using the TrackMate plugin [30] of Fiji [31].

Combined chemotaxis/motility assays were performed on swimming plates (YG medium with 0.3% agar), inoculated with the tested strains by inserting a suspension of the bacteria into the soft agar layer. Images of the plates were taken at regular time points for around 60 h, and the diameter of the colony growth in the plate was measured on the pictures using Fiji.

For pairwise in vitro competition experiments, GFP- and mScarlet-tagged strains (Supplementary Table S1) were mixed together in a 1:1 ratio. Strain mixtures were inoculated either in liquid Minimal Medium (MM) with either glucose or succinate as carbon source, on standard (1.5% agar) YG plates, or on swimming plates as above. Co-cultures were grown for 24 h at 28°C. The cells were harvested in 1X posphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer from across the growth for liquid cultures and solid agar plates or from the edges only of the growth zone for the swimming plates. The relative number of GFP- and mScarlet-I-labeled bacteria in the harvested cells of each sample was measured by flow cytometry and a CI was calculated as above.

Strain metabolic profiles were analyzed using four 96-well Phenotype Microarray (PM) (Biolog Inc., USA) microplates, which consisted of two microplates of carbon substrates (PM1 and PM2A), one microplate of various nitrogen substrates (PM3B), and one microplate of different phosphorus and sulfur substrates (PM4A). The assays were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Sensitivity assays of the Caballeronia strains to AMPs were performed essentially as before and as detailed in the Supplementary Information [25].

Other methods and detailed procedures

Full descriptions of all above methods as well as the creation of fluorescent protein labeled strains are provided in Supplementary Information.

Results

Coreus marginatus and R. pedestris select Caballeronia strains of different subclades from the same soil sample

To determine whether host specificity or geographic preference of Caballeronia subclades is involved in the midgut colonization in Coreoidea insects, we performed a soil-inoculation experiment that mimics more closely the natural symbiont acquisition process than the standard laboratory gnotobiotic system of insect colonization with specific, selected bacterial strains. For this, second instar nymphs of R. pedestris and C. marginatus were reared on the same soil suspension, prepared from a natural prairie soil sample. Bacterial diversity in the midgut crypts of the third instar nymphs was investigated by generating plasmid clone libraries of 16S rRNA gene Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) products per insect specimen and sequencing of clones. In a total of 363 sequences from 22 and 17 individuals of R. pedestris and C. marginatus, respectively, 11 OTUs were obtained, which corresponded to Caballeronia, Paraburkholderia, and Pandoraea spp. (Supplementary Table S2; Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2). The data suggest that the M4 of insect individuals is mostly dominated by a single phylotype (Supplementary Fig. S2).

A molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene, including the sequences of the 11 OTUs, several type strains of Caballeronia, Burkholderia, Paraburkholderia, and Pandoraea, as well as previously reported gut symbionts of different Coreoidea insects, placed the Caballeronia OTUs in the α-, β-, and γ-subclades (Fig. 1A). No OTU from our sampling was detected within the δ-subclade (also called “Coreoidea-clade” [15]), despite the fact that all known sequences of this subclade are derived from wild specimen of Coreoidea insects, including from Japanese specimen of C. marginatus [6, 12, 15, 32]. Although this clade has been detected in the midgut of Coreoidea stinkbugs, it has been rarely detected in other environments. Hence it is considered to be very low abundant in soil. Two OTUs were placed in the Paraburkholderia but apart from the previously defined insect-associated, plant-associated beneficial and environmental (iPBE) clade, containing the gut symbionts of Largidae species [33–35]. Four other OTUs were in the Pandoraea group.

The relative proportion of the OTUs detected in the M4 midguts of R. pedestris and C. marginatus demonstrates that Caballeronia dominated in both insects with respectively 87.5% and 97.5% of the detected crypt strains (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Table S2), in agreement with the known specificity of these insects for Caballeronia spp. [7, 12]. However, strains of the α-subclade of Caballeronia occupied 56% in R. pedestris, but only 16% in C. marginatus. In contrast, β-strains showed the opposite tendency, with 61% detected in C. marginatus, but none in R. pedestris. The γ-strains showed 33% and 20% of occupancy in R. pedestris and C. marginatus, respectively. Thus, the dominant Caballeronia strains were different between R. pedestris and C. marginatus suggesting a different symbiont specificity at a fine taxonomic scale.

Colonization of gnotobiotic R. pedestris and C. marginatus by α-, β-, and γ-subclade Caballeronia strains

To investigate the ability of Caballeronia belonging to the different subclades to colonize the midguts of R. pedestris and C. marginatus, GFP-labeled strains were independently inoculated to second instar nymphs of R. pedestris and C. marginatus, and the status of midgut colonization at the third instar nymphs was surveyed by epifluorescence microscopy. The investigated strains included the α-strain C. insecticola (isolated from the gut of a R. pedestris specimen), three β-strains, Cm1876 (isolated from the gut of a C. marginatus specimen), Lo2144 (isolated from the gut of a L. occidentalis specimen), and Caballeronia sordidicola (type strain DSM17212T), and the two γ- strains Caballeronia telluris (type strain LMG22936T) and Caballeronia glathei (type strain JCM10563T) (Fig. 2A; Supplementary Table S1) [12, 15]. The gnotobiotic infection test demonstrated that the α- and β-strains displayed an almost 100% colonization ability in the midgut crypts (proportion of tested insects that were infected in the M4 crypts) of both, R. pedestris and C. marginatus, whereas the colonization rate with the γ-strains was slightly lower than the other two Caballeronia subclades, particularly in C. marginatus (Fig. 2B). Inspection of the crypt infection by fluorescence microscopy confirmed a regular infection pattern for all tested strains in the two insects except for C. telluris (γ-strain) in the C. marginatus crypts, which were only partially infected by this strain in some individuals (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). Together, these results show that strains of the three subclades have high colonization ability in the midgut of R. pedestris and C. marginatus, though γ-strains are slightly less efficient.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The crypt colonization ability of R. pedestris and C. marginatus and fitness advantages in R. pedestris provided by Caballeronia strains. (A) Phylogenetic tree, based on the 16S rRNA gene, of Caballeronia strains used in bacterial inoculation tests in R. pedestris and C. marginatus. Abbreviations of bacterial strain are provided in brackets. (B) Second instar nymphs were inoculated with single strains as indicated. The colonization rate in the midgut crypts of R. pedestris and C. marginatus is indicated. The third instar nymphs of R. pedestris (n = 20–59) and C. marginatus (n ≥ 5) were investigated at 5 dpi and 7 dpi, respectively. The bacterial names are provided in abbreviated form as indicated in A. (C–K) Fitness advantages in R. pedestris provided by Caballeronia strains. Riptortus pedestris individuals were colonized by the indicated Caballeronia strains. The following fitness parameters were determined: Insect survival rate (C); developmental time until reaching adulthood (D); number of eggs produced during the first week after commencement of egg-laying by one female reared in the presence of two males (E); body weight of males (F); body length of males (G); thorax width of males (H); body weight of females (I); body length of females (J); thorax width of females (K). Standard deviations are indicated by vertical bars. The numbers in the histograms indicate the number of analyzed samples n. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < .05) determined by a Kruskal–Wallis test with the Dunn post hoc test and P-value adjustment with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

We determined if selected strains from the α-, β-, and γ-subclades provide fitness advantages to the host insect. This analysis was limited to R. pedestris because efficient rearing conditions are available for this insect and fitness advantages derived from the crypt symbionts have been well characterized [7, 29], while the generation of offspring in C. marginatus in our rearing conditions was insufficient for multiple experiments. The survival rate, developmental time to reach adulthood, body mass and size of adults, and egg production were determined in R. pedestris apo insects or insects infected with C. insecticola (α-subclade strain), Caballeronia strain Cm1876 (β-subclade strain), or C. telluris (γ-subclade strain) (Fig. 2C–K). Insects infected with the three strains showed a nearly 100% survival rate, identical to apo insects, indicating that none of the bacteria had a negative effect on the host (Fig. 2C). The different measured fitness parameters showed that all three tested strains provided an enhanced fitness to the host, compared to apo insects (Fig. 2D–K). However, whereas the developmental time and body mass were similar for the insects infected with the three Caballeronia strains, body size and egg production were significantly lower in insects infected with Caballeronia strain Cm1876 or C. telluris compared to insects carrying the natural crypt symbiont C. insecticola (Fig. 2E–K). Thus overall, even if all the tested Caballeronia strains can provide fitness services to the host, C. insecticola provides superior advantages.

Caballeronia interspecies competition determines the crypt occupancy

Although Caballeronia of the three subclades has a good colonization ability in R. pedestris and C. marginatus, the soil inoculation test demonstrated that respectively α- and β-OTUs were dominant in these two insect species (Fig. 1). To further explore a potential selection at the Caballeronia subclade level, pairwise bacteria-bacteria competition assays were conducted. Equal amounts of GFP- and mScarlet-I-labeled strains belonging to different Caballeronia subclades (Supplementary Table S1) were inoculated in growth medium or fed to R. pedestris and C. marginatus nymphs and the relative amount of both strains was determined by flow cytometry after growth in in vitro cultures or establishment in the M4 crypts of the insects. In liquid culture, two carbon sources were used, the glycolytic carbon source glucose and the gluconeogenic carbon source succinate. The latter nutrient was used because it was demonstrated that in the crypts, the colonizing bacteria are fed with a gluconeogenic substrate [24, 26]. Besides revealing differences in growth rate between strains, competition in liquid cultures also test for secretion of compounds that are toxic for competing bacteria. Additionally, antagonism between competitors by contact-dependent mechanisms [36] was tested on solid agar plates that favor cell–cell contact.

For in vitro control competitions, GFP- and mScarlet-I-labeled C. insecticola clones, both derivatives of the Riptortus pedestris endosymbiont (RPE) RPE75 strain (Supplementary Table S1), kept each other in close balance in the two liquid media and the solid medium (Fig. 3A–C), indicating that the introduction of fluorescent markers, carried on a Tn7 transposon inserted in the genome, has no noticeable effect on the fitness of the bacteria. In all tested strain combinations in the three in vitro set-ups, strain-pairs mostly kept each other in balance with only minor deviations from equal abundance after 24 h of growth (|CI| ≤ 101) (Fig. 3A–C). Thus, the pairwise competition assays in culture revealed no strong growth differences or antagonisms between Caballeronia strains.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Competition assays of Caballeronia strains in culture and in insect midgut crypts. (A and B) CI of Caballeronia strains in culture in minimum medium with glucose (A) or succinate (B) as carbon source (n = 4). (C) CI of Caballeronia strains in growth in contact on solid agar plates with YG medium. (D and E) CI of Caballeronia strains in the midgut crypts of R. pedestris (n = 10) (D), or C. marginatus (n = 5–14) (E). Midguts of R. pedestris and C. marginatus were investigated at 5 dpi and 7 dpi, respectively. The used strains are abbreviated according to the key at the bottom right. The CI indicates the ratio of a tested β- or γ-strain to the C. insecticola (α) or C. telluris (γ) strain, normalized by the ratio of the inoculum (inocula were prepared with close to equal amounts of the two competing strains). Dots and black lines show the CI in individual insects and the mean of the replicates, respectively. Letters indicate significant differences (P < .05) using a Kruskal–Wallis test with the Dunn post hoc test and P-value adjustment with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Contrary to the cultures, pairwise combinations in the midgut crypts of the two tested insects showed mostly strong competitive interactions whereby one strain outcompeted the other (|CI| > 102). In the case of R. pedestris, the β-subclade strains were outcompeted by the α-strains in the midgut crypts in all tested cases (Fig. 3D). The same pairwise competitions provided in C. marginatus very different outcomes. Here, the β-strain Cm1876 outcompeted the α-strain C. insecticola, while the two other combinations resulted in a stochastic crypt colonization outcome wherein each insect was infected almost exclusively by either one of the paired strains in a random fashion (Fig. 3E). Also in the case of β- versus γ-competitions, the outcomes were strongly contrasted in the two insect species (Fig. 3D and E). The γ-strain was significantly outcompeted by the β-strains in C. marginatus. In contrast, the γ-strain outcompeted two of the β-strains in R. pedestris while the other γ–β confrontation between C. telluris and strain Cm1876 was the only observed case where the two strains could coexist in the crypts of the same insects. In both insect species, the γ-strains were outcompeted by the α-strain (Fig. 3D and E). Several of the competitions in C. marginatus showed a higher variability in the CI between insect individuals than in R. pedestris, suggesting a non-negligible influence of stochastic picking up of symbionts in the former species.

Collectively, the above results demonstrate that the two stinkbug species have different selectivity for the Caballeronia subclade strains that they host in the M4 midgut crypts. Overall, the specificity can be summarized as α > γ > β for R. pedestris and β > α > γ for C. marginatus (Fig. 3), which is in very good correspondence to the specificity suggested by the soil inoculation experiment (Fig. 1).

Dynamics of interspecies competitions reveal different underpinning mechanisms

Out-competition of one strain by another in co-infection could be the result of priority effects whereby the timing of arrival in the crypt area will determine which strain will win the competition or alternatively, competing strains might initially coexist in the crypts followed by displacement of one of the strains. In previous confrontation experiments between the α-strain C. insecticola and more distantly related Paraburkholderia or Pandoraea spp., it was shown that initially strains coexisted in the crypts and that C. insecticola subsequently displaced the competitor [22]. We analyzed four of the above interactions if we could detect evidence for priority effects or displacement mechanisms. The dynamics of competition during M4 crypt colonization in R. pedestris was followed over time after co-infections of the insects with C. insecticola (α-strain) together with either strain Cm1876 (β-strain), C. sordidicola (β-strain), strain Lo2144 (β-strain), or C. glathei (γ-strain) (Fig. 4). The M4 community was analyzed at an early time point (1.5 dpi), an intermediate time point (3 dpi), and a late time point (5 dpi). Overall, three patterns of colonization dynamics could be distinguished. In the case of the C. insecticola/Cm1876, initially the two strains coexist in the midgut crypts and gradually, C. insecticola displaces the Cm1876 strain (Fig. 4A). In contrast, in the case of the C. insecticola/C. sordidicola and C. insecticola/C. glathei interactions, C. insecticola dominates from the early stages, a pattern that suggests a priority effect (Fig. 4B and C). Finally, the colonization pattern of the C. insecticola/Lo2144 competition suggests a mixed mechanism whereby a priority effect leads to a majority of either one of the strains in the crypts followed by a displacement of the Lo2144 strain by C. insecticola (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Dynamics of competition of Caballeronia strains in midgut crypts of Riptortus pedestris. (A) CI of Cm versus In. (B) CI of So versus In. (C) CI of Gl versus In. (D) CI of Lo versus In. Competitions were determined in the midgut crypts of R. pedestris (n = 10) at 1.5, 3 and 5 dpi. The CI indicates the ratio of the two tested strains, normalized by one of the inoculum. Dots and black lines show the CI in individual insects and the mean of the replicates, respectively. The used strains are abbreviated according to the key at the bottom right. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < .05). Statistical significance was analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn post hoc test and P-value adjustment with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Bacterial factors contributing to interspecies competition

Several molecular mechanisms underlying the efficient R. pedestris M4 midgut colonization capacity of C. insecticola have been revealed. Among them are the use of host-derived carbon sources via gluconeogenesis, chemotaxis, and resistance to AMPs. Mutants of C. insecticola in the genes fbp and pps (gluconeogenesis) [24], cheA (chemotaxis; Supplementary Fig. S4) [37], or wzm and tpr (AMP resistance) [25] are still capable to colonize the R. pedestris M4 crypts but less efficiently than the parental wild-type strain and these mutants are fully outcompeted by the wild type. To determine whether factors controlled by these five genes are also involved in interspecific bacteria-bacteria competition in the midgut of R. pedestris, we conducted competition assays in R. pedestris confronting the five mutants with the γ-strain C. telluris. As above, the wild-type C. insecticola strongly outcompeted C. telluris while all five mutants were severely affected to various degrees (Fig. 5A). This result indicates that the superior performance of C. insecticola, compared to C. telluris, for R. pedestris midgut colonization is multifactorial, depending at least on nutritional, stress-response, and chemotactic adaptations. To further elaborate this hypothesis, we compared these three parameters directly in the members of our Caballeronia test panel.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bacterial functions contributing to interspecies competition. (A) Competition assay of C. telluris (γ) and C. insecticola (α) wild type (WT) and mutants in midgut crypts of R. pedestris. An equal mixture of mScarlet-I-labeled C. telluris (γ) and GFP-labeled C. insecticola mutants was fed to R. pedestris and the relative abundance of mScarlet-I- and GFP-labeled bacteria colonizing the midgut crypts at 5 dpi (n = 10) was determined. The CI indicates the ratio of the C. telluris strain to the tested C. insecticola WT or mutant strains, normalized by the ratio of the inoculum. The tpr and wzm mutants have reduced AMP resistance. The cheA mutant has lost chemotaxis and the fbp and pps mutants cannot perform gluconeogenesis. Dots and black lines show the CI in individual insects and the mean of the replicates, respectively. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (P < .05). Statistical significance was analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test, Dunn post hoc test, and P-value adjustment with the Benjamini–Hochberg method. (B) Combined motility and chemotaxis competition assays on 0.3% YG agar swimming plates. GFP and mScarlet-I-labeled strains were inoculated in a 1:1 ratio in the center of the plates and cells were harvested after 24 h growth at the edge of the growth zone for measurement of the relative abundance of the GFP and mScarlet-I-labeled strains. (C) Heatmaps and hierarchical cluster analysis of metabolite usage by Caballeronia strains using Biolog Phenotype MicroArrays. Metabolites are in rows and strains in columns. The top cluster shows the metabolic capacity of strains for all metabolites used by C. telluris. The middle cluster contains metabolites used by C. insecticola but not by one or more β-Caballeronia strains. The lower cluster contains the metabolites used by the β-Caballeronia strains but not by C. insecticola. The full dataset of 384 conditions is shown in Supplementary Fig. S6. The compound order in the three clusters is available in the Supplementary Data Set 1. (D) Resistance of Caballeronia strains to AMPs. The heat map shows the minimal concentrations of growth inhibition of the indicated wild-type and mutant strains by the listed AMPs. Minimal concentrations are indicated in μg/ml. The color key of the heat maps in panels C and D are indicated at their right. The used strains in all panels are abbreviated according to the key at the top right.

The swimming velocity of the six strains was determined in exponential phase bacteria growing in rich medium using videos taken by fluorescence microscopy. All strains were motile showing moderate variations in the mean velocity (Supplementary Fig. S5A). Next, the chemotactic performance of the strains was compared using swimming plates in which bacteria are inoculated in soft agar and move away from the inoculation point through their combined motility and chemotactic activity. The measurement of the diameter of growing colonies in function of time highlighted differences between strains, suggesting variable chemotactic abilities (Supplementary Fig. S5B). Pairwise competitions on swimming plates confirmed that the more efficient chemotactic strains outcompeted the less efficient ones at the front of the growing community (Fig. 5B). The CIs on the swimming plates correlated well with the corresponding CIs in the gut of R. pedestris (Fig. 3D), suggesting that chemotaxis is a strong contributor to the specificity in this species. In contrast, the pattern of CIs in the swimming plates (Fig. 5B) is different from the CIs in the C. marginatus gut (Fig. 3E), suggesting that in this insect, mechanisms, other than motility and chemotaxis, are more important in symbiont selection.

The metabolic capacities of the strains in the test panel were profiled with Biolog Phenotype MicroArrays [38]. Testing the use of hundreds of potential carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, and sulfur sources revealed that the six strains have distinguishable metabolite usage patterns whereby the three tested β-Caballeronia strains are most similar to each other while the α- and two γ-subclade strains are each different (Supplementary Fig. S6). The γ-subclade strain C. telluris seems to metabolize the largest set of compounds and only few compounds that are metabolized by the other strains are not processed by it (Fig. 5C, top cluster). Nevertheless, this strain is not dominating the α-subclade strain in R. pedestris or the β-Caballeronia strains in C. marginatus (Fig. 3D and E), indicating that the superior metabolic capacity of C. telluris is not sufficient for dominating in the crypts of the two stinkbug species. In contrast, the α-strain C. insecticola metabolizes several compounds that are not processed by the β-Caballeronia strains (Fig. 5C, middle cluster), which could contribute to the superior colonization capacity of C. insecticola in R. pedestris relative to the β-strains. At the opposite, the β-strains have also metabolic capacities that are absent in C. insecticola (Fig. 5C, bottom cluster) but as these capacities are mostly shared by the tested β-strains, while they do not have the same competitive advantage to C. insecticola in the colonization of the C. marginatus gut (Fig. 3E), it is not straightforward to correlate these metabolic capacities with gut colonization. Taken together, the Caballeronia strains have distinct metabolic activities, which could contribute to the efficiency of crypt colonization although, in the absence of knowledge on the specific identify of crypt metabolites, they are not easily correlated with the observed competitive behavior in the R. pedestris and C. marginatus crypts.

We tested the resistance of the Caballeronia strains of the test panel against a set of AMPs, including crypt-specific cysteine rich peptide (CCR) AMPs produced in the posterior midgut of R. pedestris [25], together with the innate immunity-related AMPs thanatin and riptocin [19], mammalian LL37 [39], plant NCR335 [40], and bacterial polymyxin B. The three β-strains as well as the γ-clade strain C. telluris were relatively more sensitive to the tested peptides, and in particular to the CCR peptides, than the α-strain C. insecticola or the γ-strain C. glathei (Fig. 5D). Thus, AMP resistance can contribute to the dominance of C. insecticola in the gut crypts relative to the β-strains or the γ-strain C. telluris. In contrast, the dominance of C. insecticola over C. glathei is probably independent of AMP resistance because both strains have similar resistance patterns. Moreover, the β-strain Cm1876 outcompetes C. insecticola in the crypts of C. marginatus, despite its lower resistance to AMPs. Thus, the dominance of the β-Caballeronia strain Cm1876 in the C. marginatus crypts seems to be independent of its overall metabolic performance, motility and chemotaxis, and AMP resistance, which suggests that this bacterium has a yet to be identified adaptation for the crypt colonization in this particular host.

Discussion

Field-collected R. pedestris and C. marginatus are both predominantly colonized by Caballeronia spp. in their M4 midgut region [6, 7, 12, 41], a pattern confirmed in our study in insects of these two species reared on the same French soil sample. Our result also matches earlier observations in R. pedestris with soil samples from South Korea and Japan [42]. However, even if the two insect species displayed the same specificity at the genus level, we discovered a marked difference between them at a finer taxonomic level. Whereas α-Caballeronia dominated in R. pedestris infected with soil bacteria, β-Caballeronia prevailed in C. marginatus. Gnotobiotic infection experiments corroborated these species-dependent specificities for Caballeronia subclades. Mono-inoculation experiments in the gnotobiotic system showed strains of all Caballeronia subclades could colonize either host. However, co-inoculation revealed competitive hierarchies between subclade strains: the α-Caballeronia is more competitive than the tested β- and γ-strains, and the γ-strains more than β-strains to colonize the symbiotic organ of R. pedestris; in contrast, β-strains have an advantage for the colonization of C. marginatus over α- and γ-strains, and α- over γ-strains. These findings confirm that species-specific subclade specificity, observed in natural specimens [12–15], are at least driven by host-bacteria compatibility and partner-choice mechanisms. We observed that less competitive strains still colonized some individuals reared on soil, likely due to ecological drift when environmental symbiont abundance is low and insects can pick up stochastically less-preferred symbiont strains [43]. Possibly, also in the gnotobiotic infection system in C. marginatus, stochastic symbiont selection is happening as suggested by the observed variability in the competition experiments between several of the tested strain pairs. The importance of ecological drift suggests that besides partner choice mechanisms, geographic distribution of Caballeronia subclades can also contribute to observed colonization patterns in wild insects.

Subclade-level specificity is also seen in other Coreoidea bugs. For example, Leptoglossus occidentalis typically hosts β- or δ-Caballeronia, even when co-infected with α-strains [15]. However, specificity varies within the Pentatomomorpha. Largidae species, for example, are selectively colonized by Paraburkholderia of the iPBE subclade rather than Caballeronia [33–35], whereas Blissidae and Bertidae, are more permissive, accepting species of multiple genera of the Burkholderia s.l. [6, 13, 44–47].

Symbiont specificity within the Pentatomomorpha echoes other environmentally transmitted symbioses, like rhizobia-legume or squid-Aliivibrio associations, where host-symbiont compatibility is mediated by molecular signaling and variations on the conserved theme of signals account for symbiont specificity [48, 49]. Likewise, we can expect that signal production and recognition are fundamental in the selection of the midgut crypt symbionts by the stinkbugs. Though the specific chemical cues in stinkbug-Caballeronia interactions remain unidentified and their identification is a crucial future challenge, our findings suggest that tested Caballeronia strains produce conserved signals while subtle differences in signal production and receptor recognition between subclades may guide symbiont selection. The here inferred chemotactic cues produced in the gut and their recognition by chemotaxis receptors of the gut bacteria may constitute one example of a signaling system controlling the stinkbug-Caballeronia symbiosis.

Beyond signaling, we show here that microbial competition in the gut strongly shapes the strain composition in the crypts. Crypt colonization begins with a bottleneck at the CR, limiting passage to a few thousand bacteria into the crypt region [20, 21]. Rapid expansion of this founding population to ~107 cells follows, offering two key windows for competition to operate: early priority effects during CR passage and establishment of the founding population and later displacement during outgrowth of the founding population.

Microorganisms generally compete in two ways: indirectly, through adaptation to the environment, or directly, by harming each other via chemical warfare [50]. Direct competition involves secreting antimicrobials like bacteriocins or injecting toxins using systems, such as Type VI secretion (T6SS) or contact-dependent inhibition [36]. Although culture experiments showed no clear antagonism between tested strains, antimicrobial, or toxin-mediated competition still may occur in the midgut crypts. For instance, C. insecticola possesses a T6SS that could target competing strains in the crypts, though evidence is still lacking: T6SS genes were downregulated in single-strain infections [26], and T6SS mutants showed no competitive disadvantage against Pandoraea or Paraburkholderia strains [22].

In contrast to direct competition, indirect competition likely plays a dominant role in midgut crypt colonization and here we identified three mechanisms. One of them is chemotaxis, guiding bacteria toward the M4 midgut region. Flagellar motility is essential for entry into the crypt region in R. pedestris through the CR [20, 51, 52]. We found that a cheA mutant of C. insecticola, though able to colonize alone, is outcompeted by its wild type and by C. telluris—which itself is usually outcompeted by the wild-type C. insecticola. This suggests that chemotactic efficiency influences competitive success. Supporting this, Caballeronia strains of the test panel showed significant differences in motility and chemotaxis, which correlated with competition outcomes in vitro that resembled strongly competition outcomes in the crypts of R. pedestris (Fig. 5B vs. Fig. 3D). Priority effects observed during infection may result from faster strains reaching the crypts earlier and establishing dominance, especially as the CR closes after the passage of the initial colonizers [21], preventing late arrivers from entering.

Indirect competition may also depend on the ability of strains to adapt to the crypt environment, affecting their growth within the crypt community. Because crypt bacteria feed on metabolites secreted by the crypt epithelium rather than ingested food, due to the crypt’s disconnection from the anterior digestive midgut region [20, 26], nutrient availability in crypts is probably limited in both quantity and diversity. Thus, bacterial growth competition, particularly in the case of displacement of one strain by another, likely hinges on their metabolic gene repertoire for harvesting crypt nutrients. Metabolic phenotyping of the tested Caballeronia strains indeed revealed their distinct capabilities. For example, we previously showed that gluconeogenesis and taurine and inositol harvesting contribute to C. insecticola’s gut fitness, with mutants in these pathways able to colonize but outcompeted by wild-type strains [24]. Here, we demonstrate that gluconeogenesis mutants also lose the ability to outcompete an otherwise less efficient Caballeronia strain, supporting the idea that available nutrient resources in the crypts and matching metabolic capacities in the crypt colonizers determine the outcome of competitions. Differences in crypt nutrients between R. pedestris and C. marginatus, which feed on soybean seeds [53] and Rumex seeds [54] respectively, likely contribute to their specificity for different Caballeronia subclades, as their distinct diets are expected to influence crypt metabolite composition.

Stress conditions in the crypt environment can limit bacterial growth and thus that potentially regulates interspecies competitions. The R. pedestris crypts produce massively a high variety of AMPs, known as CCRs that can kill or inhibit growth of bacteria [25]. Typical crypt colonizing bacteria are resistant to these peptides but CCR-sensitive mutants of C. insecticola, such as the here tested wzm and tpr mutants, have a strongly reduced fitness for crypt colonization and are outcompeted by wild-type C. insecticola or by a competing species [25; this study]. The tested Caballeronia strains have distinct resistance profiles to CCRs. Overall, this suggest that the adaptation of candidate gut symbionts to grow in the presence of the CCRs contributes to the selection process during competitive crypt colonization. Moreover, R. pedestris and C. marginatus possibly produce different panels of CCRs in order to select their matching microbial partners.

The majority of our tested competitions results in a “winner takes all” outcome, with one of the competitors dominating and the other one nearly eliminated (|CI| > 102). This observation reflects well the colonization pattern seen in insects reared on soil or in wild-captured insects of different bug species, which have midgut crypts that are mostly dominated by a single OTU [this work; 12, 13, 33, 29, 42, 45, 55]. Because the bacterial population in the crypts is generated by a small founding population that multiplies within the crypts [21], the nearly mono-strain composition of the final crypt population needs to be explained by either strong differences in the number of bacteria of competing strains composing the crypt founding community, despite an equal composition in the inoculum in our experimental competitions (e.g. due to different efficiency of strains in passage through the CR) or by strong differences in the growth rate of the strains within the crypts (e.g. due to differences in the adaptations to the nutritional or stress conditions in the crypts).

Although all tested strains provide an enhanced fitness to the host compared to apo insects, the most competitive symbiont of R. pedestris provides higher reproductive benefits to the insect than the less favored strains, despite the fact that the selection of the symbiont is happening in the early life of the host, well before the host can assess the benefits received from the symbiont during adulthood and reproduction. Other studies on related bug-Caballeronia associations reported a nearly the same degree of host benefit provided by more or less distantly related symbionts [8, 22, 56]. However, these studies measured fitness parameters like survival, developmental time, and body size, while the strongest difference that we have detected between strains is egg production, which was not compared between symbiont strains in the other studies. Possibly, determining the reproduction fitness in other strain comparisons, or other parameters like immune priming [19], could reveal differences in strain performances also in other cases. Admittedly, our observation of larger fitness provided by the most competitive strain is based on comparing a small number of strains comprising one competitive and two less-competitive ones. The hypothesis of a connection between symbiont selection and fitness will require further testing involving a larger panel of strains.

The possible selection of optimal symbionts by R. pedestris contrasts starkly with the selection of rhizobium symbionts by legumes, which are unable to pick out from the soil efficient nitrogen fixing symbionts from inefficient strains because the nitrogen fixation per se is not active during the selection and infection process but only at the late stage of the interaction when the nodule is formed and occupied with the selected rhizobium strain [57, 58]. However, at the level of the whole plant that carries many nodules, the host applies sanctions to the least efficient nodules. Because sanctioned nodules contain fewer viable bacteria than non-sanctioned ones, efficient nitrogen-fixing symbionts nevertheless progressively outcompete less efficient strains [59, 60]. The proposed alignment of the symbiont-host specificity with the host benefits obtained from the symbiont in R. pedestris suggests a different scenario. Contrary to the rhizobia-legume symbiosis, the insects can potentially monitor already in the infecting bacteria the capacity to produce the services that will contribute ultimately to the host fitness at a later stage. These services are at present not clearly defined at the molecular level and their identification will be helpful to better understand the details of symbiont selection in these insects. In addition, the crypt symbionts could not only deliver specific metabolites to the host but also need to provide bacterial biomass to replace crypt bacteria that are consumed in the M4B region, an anterior subregion of M4 whose function is to digest symbiont cells and absorb the derived nutrients that support insect development [26]. In that case, a Caballeronia strain with higher proliferation efficiency in the crypts could dominate the bacteria–bacteria competition within the crypts in the early stage of the interaction and supply in a late stage substantial more bacterial biomass, resulting in more nutritional benefits to the host.

Supplementary Material

Lextrait_et_al_2025_Supplementary_Information_revision_3_wraf240

Acknowledgements

We thank Minhyung Jung from the Kikuchi lab for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Gaëlle Lextrait, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Srotoswini Joardar, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), 82152 Munich, Germany; Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.

Raynald Cossard, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Yoshitomo Kikuchi, Bioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Hokkaido Center, 062-8517 Sapporo, Japan.

Tsubasa Ohbayashi, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture, and Food Research Organization (NARO), 305-8604 Tsukuba, Japan.

Peter Mergaert, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Author contributions

Peter Mergaert, Tsubasa Ohbayashi, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, and Gaelle Lextrait conceived and designed the study. Gaelle Lextrait, Srotoswini Joardar, Raynald Cossard, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, Tsubasa Ohbayashi, and Peter Mergaert performed the experiments and analysed the results. Peter Mergaert wrote the paper and all authors amended and commented on the various versions of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

This work benefited from financial support by Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS to P.M., by the ANR grant ANR-19-CE20-0007 to P.M., and by a JSPS-CNRS Bilateral Open Partnership Joint Research Project (18KK0211) and a CNRS International Research Project to Y.K. and P.M. The present work has benefited from Imagerie-Gif core facility supported by I’Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-EQPX-0029/Morphoscope, ANR-10-INBS-04/France-BioImaging; ANR-11-IDEX-0003-02/Saclay Plant Sciences). G.L. was supported by a PhD fellowship from the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and Innovation and T.O. by JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientist (14J03996, 20170267 and 19J01106).

Data availability

The nucleotide sequence data of the 16S rRNA gene obtained in the present study have been deposited in the DDBJ public database with the accession numbers LC816739-LC817101. All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  • 1. Fisher  RM, Henry  LM, Cornwallis  CK. et al.  The evolution of host-symbiont dependence. Nat Commun  2017;8:15973. 10.1038/ncomms15973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cornwallis  CK, Van't Padje  A, Ellers  J. et al.  Symbioses shape feeding niches and diversification across insects. Nat Ecol Evol  2023;7:1022–44. 10.1038/s41559-023-02058-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chouvenc  T, Šobotník  J, Engel  MS. et al.  Termite evolution: mutualistic associations, key innovations, and the rise of Termitidae. Cell Mol Life Sci  2021;78:2749–69. 10.1007/s00018-020-03728-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. García-Lozano  M, Henzler  C, Porras  MÁG. et al.  Paleocene origin of a streamlined digestive symbiosis in leaf beetles. Curr Biol  2024;34:1621–34.e9. 10.1016/j.cub.2024.01.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stubbendieck  RM, Li  H, Currie  CR. Convergent evolution of signal-structure interfaces for maintaining symbioses. Curr Opin Microbiol  2019;50:71–8. 10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kikuchi  Y, Hosokawa  T, Fukatsu  T. An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J  2011;5:446–60. 10.1038/ismej.2010.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kikuchi  Y, Hosokawa  T, Fukatsu  T. Insect-microbe mutualism without vertical transmission: a stinkbug acquires a beneficial gut symbiont from the environment every generation. Appl Environ Microbiol  2007;73:4308–16. 10.1128/AEM.00067-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hunter  MS, Umanzor  EF, Kelly  SE. et al.  Development of common leaf-footed bug pests depends on the presence and identity of their environmentally acquired symbionts. Appl Environ Microbiol  2022;88:e0177821. 10.1128/AEM.01778-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Koga  R, Moriyama  M, Onodera-Tanifuji  N. et al.  Single mutation makes Escherichia coli an insect mutualist. Nat Microbiol  2022;7:1141–50. 10.1038/s41564-022-01179-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hosokawa  T, Kikuchi  Y, Nikoh  N. et al.  Strict host-symbiont cospeciation and reductive genome evolution in insect gut bacteria. PLoS Biol  2006;4:e337. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hosokawa  T, Ishii  Y, Nikoh  N. et al.  Obligate bacterial mutualists evolving from environmental bacteria in natural insect populations. Nat Microbiol  2016;1:15011. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ohbayashi  T, Itoh  H, Lachat  J. et al.  Burkholderia gut symbionts associated with European and Japanese populations of the dock bug Coreus marginatus (Coreoidea: Coreidae). Microbes Environ  2019;34:219–22. 10.1264/jsme2.ME19011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ravenscraft  A, Thairu  MW, Hansen  AK. et al.  Continent-scale sampling reveals fine-scale turnover in a beneficial bug symbiont. Front Microbiol  2020;11:1276. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Acevedo  TS, Fricker  GP, Garcia  JR. et al.  The importance of environmentally acquired bacterial symbionts for the squash bug (Anasa tristis), a significant agricultural pest. Front Microbiol  2021;12:719112. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.719112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ohbayashi  T, Cossard  R, Lextrait  G. et al.  Intercontinental diversity of Caballeronia gut symbionts in the conifer pest bug Leptoglossus occidentalis. Microbes Environ  2022;37:ME22042. 10.1264/jsme2.ME22042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lee  JB, Park  KE, Lee  SA. et al.  Gut symbiotic bacteria stimulate insect growth and egg production by modulating hexamerin and vitellogenin gene expression. Dev Comp Immunol  2017;69:12–22. 10.1016/j.dci.2016.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kikuchi  Y, Fukatsu  T. Live imaging of symbiosis: spatiotemporal infection dynamics of a GFP-labelled Burkholderia symbiont in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. Mol Ecol  2014;23:1445–56. 10.1111/mec.12479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kikuchi  Y, Hayatsu  M, Hosokawa  T. et al.  Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2012;109:8618–22. 10.1073/pnas.1200231109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kim  JK, Lee  JB, Huh  YR. et al.  Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus pedestris. Dev Comp Immunol  2015;53:265–9. 10.1016/j.dci.2015.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ohbayashi  T, Takeshita  K, Kitagawa  W. et al.  Insect's intestinal organ for symbiont sorting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2015;112:E5179–88. 10.1073/pnas.1511454112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kikuchi  Y, Ohbayashi  T, Jang  S. et al.  Burkholderia insecticola triggers midgut closure in the bean bug Riptortus pedestris to prevent secondary bacterial infections of midgut crypts. ISME J  2020;14:1627–38. 10.1038/s41396-020-0633-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Itoh  H, Jang  S, Takeshita  K. et al.  Host-symbiont specificity determined by microbe-microbe competition in an insect gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2019;116:22673–82. 10.1073/pnas.1912397116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kim  JK, Jang  HA, Won  YJ. et al.  Purine biosynthesis-deficient Burkholderia mutants are incapable of symbiotic accommodation in the stinkbug. ISME J  2014;8:552–63. 10.1038/ismej.2013.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jouan  R, Lextrait  G, Lachat  J. et al.  Transposon sequencing reveals the essential gene set and genes enabling gut symbiosis in the insect symbiont Caballeronia insecticola. ISME Commun  2024;4:ycad001. 10.1093/ismeco/ycad001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lachat  J, Lextrait  G, Jouan  R. et al.  Hundreds of antimicrobial peptides create a selective barrier for insect gut symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2024;121:e2401802121. 10.1073/pnas.2401802121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ohbayashi  T, Futahashi  R, Terashima  M. et al.  Comparative cytology, physiology and transcriptomics of Burkholderia insecticola in symbiosis with the bean bug Riptortus pedestris and in culture. ISME J  2019;13:1469–83. 10.1038/s41396-019-0361-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kikuchi  Y, Hosokawa  T, Fukatsu  T. Specific developmental window for establishment of an insect-microbe gut symbiosis. Appl Environ Microbiol  2011;77:4075–81. 10.1128/AEM.00358-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021. https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jang  S, Ishigami  K, Mergaert  P. et al.  Ingested soil bacteria breach gut epithelia and prime systemic immunity in an insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2024;121:e2315540121. 10.1073/pnas.2315540121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ershov  D, Phan  MS, Pylvänäinen  JW. et al.  TrackMate 7: integrating state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms into tracking pipelines. Nat Methods  2022;19:829–32. 10.1038/s41592-022-01507-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schindelin  J, Arganda-Carreras  I, Frise  E. et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods  2012;9:676–82. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sullivan  LT, Kelly  SE, Ravenscraft  A. et al.  Acquisition of an obligate environmental symbiont may be limited in the arboreal environment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol  2025;101:fiaf045. 10.1093/femsec/fiaf045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Takeshita  K, Matsuura  Y, Itoh  H. et al.  Burkholderia of plant-beneficial group are symbiotically associated with bordered plant bugs (Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoroidea: Largidae). Microbes Environ  2015;30:321–9. 10.1264/jsme2.ME15153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Gordon  ER, McFrederick  Q, Weirauch  C. Phylogenetic evidence for ancient and persistent environmental symbiont reacquisition in Largidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Appl Environ Microbiol  2016;82:7123–33. 10.1128/AEM.02114-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Yashima  R, Terata  Y, Sakamoto  K. et al.  Paraburkholderia largidicola sp. nov., a gut symbiont of the bordered plant bug Physopelta gutta. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol  2024;74:006411. 10.1099/ijsem.0.006411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. García-Bayona  L, Comstock  LE. Bacterial antagonism in host-associated microbial communities. Science  2018;361:eaat2456. 10.1126/science.aat2456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ishigami  K, Lirette  A-O, Kikuchi  Y. Evolution in spatiotemporal infection patterns of Burkholderia sensu lato lineages in the gut of Riptortus pedestris. bioRxiv 2025; 2025.10.29.685444. 10.1101/2025.10.29.685444 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mackie  AM, Hassan  KA, Paulsen  IT. et al.  Biolog Phenotype MicroArrays for phenotypic characterization of microbial cells. Methods Mol Biol  2014;1096:123–30. 10.1007/978-1-62703-712-9_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Burton  MF, Steel  PG. The chemistry and biology of LL-37. Nat Prod Rep  2009;26:1572–84. 10.1039/b912533g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Farkas  A, Maróti  G, Kereszt  A. et al.  Comparative analysis of the bacterial membrane disruption effect of two natural plant antimicrobial peptides. Front Microbiol  2017;8:51. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kikuchi  Y, Meng  XY, Fukatsu  T. Gut symbiotic bacteria of the genus Burkholderia in the broad-headed bugs Riptortus clavatus and Leptocorisa chinensis (Heteroptera: Alydidae). Appl Environ Microbiol  2005;71:4035–43. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4035-4043.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gook  DH, Jung  M, Kim  S. et al.  Species diversity of environmentally-transmitted bacteria colonizing Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae) and symbiotic effects of the most dominant bacteria. Sci Rep  2023;13:15166. 10.1038/s41598-023-42419-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Chen  JZ, Kwong  Z, Gerardo  NM. et al.  Ecological drift during colonization drives within-host and between-host heterogeneity in an animal-associated symbiont. PLoS Biol  2024;22:e3002304. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Boucias  DG, Garcia-Maruniak  A, Cherry  R. et al.  Detection and characterization of bacterial symbionts in the Heteropteran, Blissus insularis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol  2012;82:629–41. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01433.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Itoh  H, Aita  M, Nagayama  A. et al.  Evidence of environmental and vertical transmission of Burkholderia symbionts in the oriental chinch bug, Cavelerius saccharivorus (Heteroptera: Blissidae). Appl Environ Microbiol  2014;80:5974–83. 10.1128/AEM.01087-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xu  Y, Buss  EA, Boucias  DG. Culturing and characterization of gut symbiont Burkholderia spp. from the southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis (Hemiptera: Blissidae). Appl Environ Microbiol  2016;82:3319–30. 10.1128/AEM.00367-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Xu  Y, Buss  EA, Boucias  DG. Environmental transmission of the gut symbiont Burkholderia to phloem-feeding Blissus insularis. PLoS One  2016;11:e0161699. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Poole  P, Ramachandran  V, Terpolilli  J. Rhizobia: from saprophytes to endosymbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol  2018;16:291–303. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Visick  KL, Stabb  EV, Ruby  EG. A lasting symbiosis: how Vibrio fischeri finds a squid partner and persists within its natural host. Nat Rev Microbiol  2021;19:654–65. 10.1038/s41579-021-00557-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ghoul  M, Mitri  S. The ecology and evolution of microbial competition. Trends Microbiol  2016;24:833–45. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kinosita  Y, Kikuchi  Y, Mikami  N. et al.  Unforeseen swimming and gliding mode of an insect gut symbiont, Burkholderia sp. RPE64, with wrapping of the flagella around its cell body. ISME J  2018;12:838–48. 10.1038/s41396-017-0010-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Yoshioka  A, Shimada  YY, Omori  T. et al.  Bacteria break through one-micrometer-square passages by flagellar wrapping. bioRxiv. 637796, 10.1101/2025.02.12.637796, 12 February 2025, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Mainali  BP, Kim  HJ, Yoon  YN. et al.  Evaluation of different leguminous seeds as food sources for the bean bug Riptortus pedestris. J Asia Pac Entomol  2014;17:115–7. 10.1016/j.aspen.2013.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Hrušková  M, Honěk  A, Pekár  S. Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera: Coreidae) as a natural enemy of Rumex obtusifolius (Polygonaceae). Acta Oecol  2005;28:281–7. 10.1016/j.actao.2005.05.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Itoh  H, Hori  T, Sato  Y. et al.  Infection dynamics of insecticide-degrading symbionts from soil to insects in response to insecticide spraying. ISME J  2018;12:909–20. 10.1038/s41396-017-0021-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Stoy  KS, Chavez  J, De Las  CV. et al.  Evaluating coevolution in a horizontally transmitted mutualism. Evolution  2023;77:166–85. 10.1093/evolut/qpac009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Bourion  V, Heulin-Gotty  K, Aubert  V. et al.  Co-inoculation of a pea core-collection with diverse rhizobial strains shows competitiveness for nodulation and efficiency of nitrogen fixation are distinct traits in the interaction. Front Plant Sci  2018;8:2249. 10.3389/fpls.2017.02249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Westhoek  A, Field  E, Rehling  F. et al.  Policing the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis: a critical test of partner choice. Sci Rep  2017;7:1419. 10.1038/s41598-017-01634-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Daubech  B, Remigi  P, Doin de Moura  G. et al.  Spatio-temporal control of mutualism in legumes helps spread symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Elife  2017;6:e28683. 10.7554/eLife.28683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Westhoek  A, Clark  LJ, Culbert  M. et al.  Conditional sanctioning in a legume-Rhizobium mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2021;118:e2025760118. 10.1073/pnas.2025760118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Lextrait_et_al_2025_Supplementary_Information_revision_3_wraf240

Data Availability Statement

The nucleotide sequence data of the 16S rRNA gene obtained in the present study have been deposited in the DDBJ public database with the accession numbers LC816739-LC817101. All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES