Figure 2.
Impact of trauma exposure on affective symptoms across resilience groups and longitudinal changes in symptom severity. (a) Line plot of affective symptom scores (BL: PHQ-4; FU1, FU2: PHQ-9 + GAD-7) by trauma exposure levels, with individuals grouped by resilience scores; resilient group showed the smallest symptom increase. (b) Bar plot of correlation coefficients (error bars: 95% CI) between trauma exposure and affective symptoms (BL, FU1, FU2) across resilience groups; resilient group had weaker associations than vulnerable group. (c) Dumbbell plot of correlations between general adverse factors and affective symptoms at BL in resilient and vulnerable groups; significant differences (pfdr<0.05) are marked. (d) Line plot of affective symptom scores (PHQ-9 + GAD-7) at FU1 and FU2; resilient group showed greater symptom reduction. (e) Line plot of affective symptom scores at FU1 and FU2 in resilient and vulnerable groups, matched for covariates (age, sex, ethnicity, education, BMI, FU1 PHQ-9, GAD-7) to ensure identical profiles. (f) Left: Sankey diagram of depression severity (PHQ-9) changes from FU1 to FU2 in resilient and vulnerable groups, matched for covariates and FU1 scores. Right: Bar plot of recovery and worsening proportions by FU1 depression severity. (g) Left: Sankey diagram of anxiety severity (GAD-7) changes from FU1 to FU2 in resilient and vulnerable groups, matched for covariates and FU1 scores. Right: Bar plot of recovery and worsening proportions by FU1 anxiety severity.
Error bars represent mean ± SE, and significant differences are marked as * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.