Table 9.
Comparative performance evaluation of the OEMPTER-ISCSO methodology through ablation study against existing techniques.
| Methodology | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBN (without ISCO) | 92.22 | 78.31 | 57.56 | 61.96 |
| DBN (with ISCO) | 92.75 | 78.86 | 58.41 | 62.69 |
| ENN (without ISCO) | 93.61 | 79.39 | 59.06 | 63.52 |
| ENN (with ISCO) | 94.38 | 79.95 | 59.84 | 64.02 |
| TCNN (without ISCO) | 95.02 | 80.79 | 60.63 | 64.87 |
| TCNN (with ISCO) | 95.84 | 81.44 | 61.19 | 65.45 |
| OEMPTER-ISCSO (Fusion Model with hyperparameter selection) | 95.93 | 96.68 | 95.93 | 96.30 |



