Skip to main content
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health logoLink to Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
. 2025 Nov 19;16:21501319251394192. doi: 10.1177/21501319251394192

Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality: Insights From Electronic Health Record Data in an Academic Medical Center

Cherise R Chin Fatt 1, Manish K Jha 1, Srividya Vasu 1, Amber E Deane 1, Jane A Foster 1, Madhukar H Trivedi 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12638667  PMID: 41261787

Abstract

Introduction:

In 2023, 14.6 million adult Americans had serious mental illness, including Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders. Further, 12.3 million adult Americans had serious suicidal thoughts and behaviors. This report examined mental health screening in non-psychiatry clinics to identify gaps in screening practices using electronic health record (EHR) data.

Methods:

De-identified data were accessed from the Epic EHR from 2016 to 2022. All participants with a recorded encounter with a mental health screening within 5 years of the first encounter date were included. The screening tools included Patient Health Questionnaire – 9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder – 7 (GAD-7), and Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR7).

Results:

The frequency of self-report use (% of total encounters) increased from 2016 to 2022. During this period, the internal medicine department consistently screened for anxiety using the GAD-7 scale in over 35% of total encounters and for suicidality using the CHRT-SR7 scale in over 20% of total encounters. Other non-psychiatry departments used these scales less frequently.

Conclusions:

This report highlights the increase in the use of key mental health questionnaires by non-psychiatric practitioners over time after implementation. EHR data enables the identification of gaps in screening for depression, anxiety, and suicidality across departments in a medical center.

Keywords: depression, anxiety, suicidality, screening, healthcare systems, electronic health record

Introduction

In 2023, 58.7 million adult Americans reported having a mental illness, including mental, behavioral, or emotional disorders, in the past year. 1 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), one of the most prevalent mental health disorders and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide,2-5 is a chronic/recurrent illness affecting 8.5% of adults in the United States in 2023. 1 MDD is characterized by a sad mood, a loss of interest or inability to enjoy or derive pleasure from activities, changes in body weight, insomnia or hypersomnia, fatigue, feeling worthless, a lack of concentration, or suicidal ideation persistently for at least 2 weeks. MDD is diagnosed if an individual reports at least five of these symptoms, with one being sad mood or loss of interest in activities (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).6,7 Major depression often co-occurs with anxiety, which is associated with severe symptoms and treatment resistance, significantly affecting quality of life.8,9 Depression severity is associated with a progressive worsening of work productivity, 10 psychosocial functioning, 11 health-related quality of life,8,9 and life satisfaction. 12 In addition, the prevalence of depression is higher in patients with chronic medical conditions, including chronic kidney disease (CKD; 26.5%), 13 diabetes (28%), Parkinson’s disease (23%), myocardial infarction (29%), stroke (18%), and cancer (16%).14,15 Comorbid depression in patients with chronic diseases increases healthcare services utilization.16,17

Despite the higher prevalence of depression in patients with chronic medical conditions, many depression cases remain undiagnosed and untreated. Among those screened for depression in the World Health Organization (WHO) study on global AGEing and adult health (Sage) Wave 1, 6% presented with clinical depression. However, 87% of these screen-positive individuals reported no history of diagnosis or treatment at study enrollment. 18 Other studies have observed the prevalence of undiagnosed depression in the general population.18-21 Undiagnosed and untreated depression exacerbates existing medical conditions, including diabetes and cancer. 22 Untreated depression in individuals with medical conditions is associated with poor quality of life, disease-related complications, increased risk of functional disability, and increased risk of all-cause mortality22-26 and untreated depression during pregnancy is associated with preterm birth, perinatal complications, and postpartum depression. 27 With this growing appreciation of undetected and untreated depression and the associated adverse health outcomes, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended routine screening for depression in 2009. 28 In 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) started to cover annual screening for depression for Medicare beneficiaries in primary care settings. The current recommendations by the USPSTF include depression and suicide risk screenings for adults, including pregnant and postpartum women and older adults over 65 years.22,29 Despite these efforts, depression, anxiety, and suicide risk screening rates remained low in primary care settings.30-32 Further, little is known about depression, anxiety, and suicide risk screening practices in specialty departments. Identifying gaps in screening practices in primary care settings and specialty departments will help develop strategies to improve mental health screening and service utilization.

Electronic health records (EHR) are widely used in the United States’ healthcare systems to record and track an individual’s utilization of healthcare services. The HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability) Act of 1996 requires that medical records be readily available to patients. 33 This resulted in the development of patient portals, providing patients with easy EHR access. These applications provide a direct and confidential channel for patients to receive and convey information to their doctors. 34 EHR systems effectively improve documentation and data availability, streamline order entry, reduce medical errors, and offer reminders for recommended screenings, including depression and anxiety.30,35 MyChart, an electronic patient portal, provides a secure online portal for patients to access their patient health records within Epic’s EHR system. Each division or department can customize the health screening surveys system for activation in the MyChart portal before a healthcare visit. Many of these screenings are used to rule out symptoms, assign assessments based on the patient population, or assign additional assessments, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), based on prior responses.

This report examined screening practices in non-psychiatry departments in a large academic medical center and associated health resource systems to identify where patients are being screened for depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. This study is the first step toward identifying opportunities to advocate for widespread depression, anxiety, and suicide risk screening in non-psychiatry clinical settings and to integrate evidence-based training in non-psychiatric clinical areas.

Methods

Data Source

The medical center’s Clinical Research Information System (utCRIS) data warehouse, modeled after the i2b2 system at the National Center for Biomedical Computing Partners HealthCare, incorporates extensive inpatient and outpatient data from the Epic Electronic Medical Record. Access to the MyChart data stored in the utCRIS data warehouse was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB; STU092015-01). The inclusion criteria for these analyses were: (1) adults (age ≥ 18 years old) who had engaged with the healthcare system and completed assessments on MyChart between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. (2) adults who completed at least one mental health assessment within 5 years of the visit date. Data extraction included encounter dates, provider and department information, annual depression screening, results, and additional ordered and completed screening measures. Before analyses, all data were de-identified.

Clinical Measures

Three self-report measures were used in this analysis:

Patient Health Questionnaire — 9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered measure of depression severity, with nine items corresponding to the nine symptoms of depression. 36 Each item inquires about the frequency of depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks, with scores ranging from 0 (“not at all”) to 3 (“nearly every day”). The PHQ-9 has a total score between 0 and 27.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder — 7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item self-report measure of anxiety symptoms, and a total score ≥ 8 represents probable generalized anxiety disorder. 37

Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR7). consists of 7 self-report measures used to detect and monitor suicidal risk. The responses range from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). 38

Data Analyses

MyChart data were first segmented by encounter visit year, and the data were summarized by number of unique patients, number of unique encounters, and total number of encounters. Due to the large number of clinical departments, departments were summarized into eight categories: internal medicine, specialties, physical medicine, surgery, oncology, other clinics, family medicine, and OB/GYN. The number of encounters where patients completed either PHQ-9, GAD-7, or CHRT-SR7 was summarized by encounter year and department category.

Results

The analytical sample included MyChart data from 82 943 individuals and their unique encounters from 2016 to 2022. Individuals were predominantly female, white, and non-Hispanic (Table 1). The total number of encounters where self-report questionnaires were administered to assess depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), or suicidal risk (CHRT-SR7) increased from 9798 encounters in 2016 to 106 775 encounters in 2022 (Table 1). The use (% of total encounters) of PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression increased from 2016 to 2022 (Figure 1). The use (% of total encounters) of CHRT-SR7 and GAD-7 increased from 2016 to 2019, decreased in 2020, and increased until 2022 (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Demographics of the Study Population.

Characteristics of the Study Population 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Sex
 Male 2950 11 345 7757 8408 9763 10 407 11 800 12 101 11 087
 Female 4981 22 473 16 414 16 220 18 011 18 709 21 967 23 366 23 159
 Unknown 0 2 1 1 2 2 6 5 3
Race
 White 5801 24 478 17 837 18 350 20 201 21 105 24 108 24 916 23 725
 Black 944 3664 2707 2818 3444 3631 4472 4991 5150
 Asian 351 1479 1045 1028 1267 1314 1561 1892 1829
 American Indian 25 100 74 72 69 85 97 115 107
 Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 6 28 25 17 15 12 15 17 26
 More than one race 804 4071 2484 2344 2780 2971 3520 3541 3412
Ethnicity
 Hispanic 565 2665 1834 1969 2416 2567 3147 3551 3469
 Non-Hispanic 6931 28 914 20 998 21 360 23 851 24 945 28 747 30 153 29 064
 Unknown 435 2241 1340 1300 1509 1606 1879 1768 1716
 Total number of encounters 9798 68 489 49 690 52 921 62 554 67 520 88 938 105 418 106 775

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Total number of encounters registered in EPIC during the study window for data collection. A graphical representation of the total encounters where mental health self-reports were administered between 2016 and 2022. Abbreviations: CHRT-SR7, Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report; GAD-7, generalized anxiety disorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire — 9.

PHQ-9 use (% of total encounters) increased over time (less than 5% of total encounters) in physical medicine, surgery, oncology, family medicine, OB/GYN departments, and other clinics from 2016 to 2022 (Figure 2). During this time, the internal medicine department consistently used the GAD-7 tool for screening anxiety in patients in over 35% of total encounters (Figure 3). Other departments used GAD-7 in under 20% of total encounters. The internal medicine department consistently used CHRT-SR7 in over 30% of total encounters from 2016 to 2022. Other departments used CHRT-SR7 in under 25% of total encounters (Figure 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Total number of encounters that measured depression severity. The percent of total encounters where depression severity was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) across different medical departments over time.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Total number of encounters that measured anxiety symptoms. The percent of total encounters where depression severity was assessed using the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) self-report questionnaire across different medical departments over time.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Total number of encounters that measured suicidality. The percent of total encounters where depression severity was assessed using the Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR7) across different medical departments over time.

Discussion

The bidirectional associations between depression and physical health are well-documented.39,40 Comorbid depression in patients with chronic medical conditions is associated with poor quality of life, poor health outcomes, 41 increased healthcare utilization, 17 increased risk of premature death,42,43 and increased economic burden. 2 Thus, depression screening as a routine practice in non-psychiatry departments will help identify patients most at risk of poor health outcomes. Between 2016 and 2022, screening rates for depression using PHQ-9 in non-psychiatric clinics increased in frequency of use across total encounters in the system. The first step in depression screening in clinical practice was administering PHQ-2, which assesses anhedonia and the frequency of depressed mood. PHQ-9 is then administered to those patients with PHQ-2 scores equal to or over 3. The frequency of PHQ-9 administration across departments was relatively low. In contrast, anxiety screening using the GAD-7 questionnaire and suicidality screening using CHRT-SR7 were much higher. Notably, screening rates were over 35% of total encounters in the Department of Internal Medicine and remained stable and consistently under 20% of all encounters in other departments. Overall, the systematic introduction and clinical availability of these self-report questionnaires increased mental health screening across the system.

To understand how these data fit into the broader clinical context, we reviewed previous reports on using EHR data in clinical systems with a longer history of collecting comparable data. EHR data has been used to determine depression prevalence, 44 depression and suicidality screening rates in primary care settings,45,46 suicide risk rates, 1-year follow-up care in a large pediatric primary care system, 47 depression and medical comorbidities, 48 and study medical comorbidity and healthcare utilization in patients with treatment-resistant depression. 16 EHR data integrated with molecular-genetic tools have been used to study polygenic liability to depression in a large population49,50 and duration of buprenorphine treatment 51 previously. Medication prescription patterns for anxiety and depressive symptoms in pediatric patients 52 and antidepressant use53,54 were monitored using EHR systems previously. EHR data has also been used to discern depression subphenotypes based on medical comorbidities and medication use,55,56 and predict postpartum depression.57,58 Combined, these studies highlight the utility of EHR data in evaluating mental health screening practices.

Mental health screening questionnaires are typically administered during the precheck process for medical appointments. In the case of a particular patient who has been screened using these tools, their EHR data can be used to follow up with patients during the appointments or after the first encounter to establish continuity of care across system-wide encounters. Patient access to their MyChart health account also allows them to track their activities and could lead to more routine remote screening sessions that could be integrated into the standard of care. Thus, incorporating mental health screening in primary and specialty care settings will help identify those requiring mental health services, improve health outcomes, and reduce the burden of mood disorders.

Several limitations exist in the current analyses using EHR data. The EHR data extraction did not include PHQ-2 data, which limited our understanding of the lower frequency of PHQ-9 use across the departments, particularly in internal medicine and OB/GYN departments. As the PHQ-2 is administered as the first step in depression screening in clinical practice, recording this information in EHR systems would help identify gaps in screening practices. Additionally, clinics may have administered these measures in paper format without recording the data in the patients’ EHRs (especially if the patients screened negative), thus introducing data collection bias.

Our current analysis using MyChart data enables the identification of gaps in screening for depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation across departments in a medical center. It provides an opportunity to introduce education services, to increase screening, and to provide clinical guidelines for treatment. Implementation of routine screening tests for depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in non-psychiatry departments is vital in standardizing mental healthcare across specialties. In large healthcare systems, clinician training in the use of mental health scales and innovative strategies is an excellent strategy to reach individuals who may not directly seek out care for mental health issues.

Footnotes

Ethical Considerations: The Institutional Review Board (IRB # STU092015-01) at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, approved the study.

Author Contributions: CCF: Formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing; MKJ: Conceptualization, data access, review & editing; SV: Writing – original draft, writing - review & editing; AD: Conceptualization, data curation, writing – review & editing. JAF: Conceptualization, methodology, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing, supervision; MHT: Funding acquisition, conceptualization, writing – review & editing, and supervision.

Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield/ Healthcare Services Corporation.

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Cherise Chin Fatt has served as an advisor for Janssen Research & Development. Dr. Manish K. Jha has received contract research grants from Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus, and Janssen Research & Development; honorarium to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network and as Guest Editor for Psychiatric Clinics of North America from Elsevier; consultant fees from Janssen Scientific Affairs and Boehringer Ingelheim; fees for serving on Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Worldwide Clinical Trials (Eliem and Inversargo), Vicore Pharma and IQVIA (Click); and honoraria for educational presentations from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, Physicians’ Education Resource, and H.C. Wainwright & Co. Dr. Jane A. Foster has served on the Scientific Advisory Board for MRM Health NL and has received consulting/speaker fees from Takeda Canada, Rothman, Benson, Hedges Inc., and WebMD. Dr. Trivedi has provided consulting services to Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alkermes Inc., Alto Neuroscience Inc., Axsome Therapeutics, BasePoint Health Management LLC, Biogen MA Inc., Cerebral Inc., Circular Genomics Inc., Compass Pathfinder Limited, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., GH Research, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc., Heading Health, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Legion Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine Inc., Myriad Neuroscience, Naki Health Ltd., Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Otsuka Europe LTD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Praxis Precision Medicines Inc., PureTech LYT Inc, Relmada Therapeutics Inc., Sage Therapeutics, Seaport Therapeutics Inc., Signant Health, Sparian Biosciences, Titan Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc., WebMD. He has received grant/research funding from NIMH, NIDA, NCATS, American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, SAMHSA, and the DoD. Additionally, he has received editorial compensation from Elsevier and Oxford University Press. Dr. Srividya Vasu and Dr. Amber Deane do not have conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement: Data are available upon request and written approval from Dr. Madhukar H. Trivedi.

References

  • 1. SAMHSA. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality SAaMHSA; 2024. NSDUH Series H-59. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2023-nsduh-annual-national-report [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, et al. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018). Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39(6):653-665. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01019-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcoholism and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(10):1097-1106. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.10.1097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. The epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder. JAMA. 2003;289(23):3095-3105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Murray CJL, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197-2223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR. 5th, text revision ed. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2022:lxix. 1050 pages. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. American Psychiatric Association D, Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5, Vol. 5. American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Daly EJTM, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, et al. Health-related quality of life in depression: a STAR*D report. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2010;22(1):43-55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a STAR*D report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(02):185-195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Beck A, Crain AL, Solberg LI, et al. Severity of depression and magnitude of productivity loss. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(4):305-311. doi: 10.1370/afm.1260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Trivedi MH, Corey-Lisle PK, Guo Z, Lennox RD, Pikalov A, Kim E. Remission, response without remission, and nonresponse in major depressive disorder: impact on functioning. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;24(3):133-138. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283277614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jha MK, Minhajuddin A, Thase ME, Jarrett RB. Improvement in self-reported quality of life with cognitive therapy for recurrent major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2014;167:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Adejumo OA, Edeki IR, Sunday Oyedepo D, et al. Global prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol. 2024;37:2455-2472. doi: 10.1007/s40620-024-01998-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Arnaud AM, Brister TS, Duckworth K, et al. Impact of major depressive disorder on comorbidities: a systematic literature review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(6). pii: 21r14328. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21r14328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gold SM, Köhler-Forsberg O, Moss-Morris R, et al. Comorbid depression in medical diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0200-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Adekkanattu P, Olfson M, Susser LC, et al. Comorbidity and healthcare utilization in patients with treatment resistant depression: a large-scale retrospective cohort analysis using electronic health records. J Affect Disord. 2023;324:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Papaioannou AI, Bartziokas K, Tsikrika S, et al. The impact of depressive symptoms on recovery and outcome of hospitalised COPD exacerbations. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(4):815-823. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00013112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lotfaliany M, Bowe SJ, Kowal P, Orellana L, Berk M, Mohebbi M. Depression and chronic diseases: co-occurrence and communality of risk factors. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Olfson M, Blanco C, Marcus SC. Treatment of adult depression in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1482-1491. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Trivedi MH, Jha MK, Kahalnik F, et al. VitalSign(6): a primary care first (PCP-first) model for universal screening and measurement-based care for depression. Pharmaceuticals. 2019;12(2):1-18. doi: 10.3390/ph12020071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Handy A, Mangal R, Stead TS, Coffee Rl, Jr., Ganti L. Prevalence and impact of diagnosed and undiagnosed depression in the United States. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28011. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, et al. Screening for depression and suicide risk in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2023;329(23):2057-2067. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. de Groot M. Diabetes and depression: Strategies to address a common comorbidity within the primary care context. Am J Med Open. 2023;9:100039. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gallo JJ, Hwang S, Joo JH, et al. Multimorbidity, depression, and mortality in primary care: randomized clinical trial of an evidence-based depression care management program on mortality risk. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(4):380-386. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3524-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gilman SE, Sucha E, Kingsbury M, Horton NJ, Murphy JM, Colman I. Depression and mortality in a longitudinal study: 1952–2011. Can Med Assoc J. 2017;189(42):E1304-e1310. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kissane DW. Unrecognised and untreated depression in cancer care. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(5):320-321. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70345-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jahan N, Went TR, Sultan W, et al. Untreated depression during pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17251. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression in adults: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(11):784-792. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Depression and Suicide Risk in Adults: Screening . 2023. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/screening-depression-suicide-risk-adults
  • 30. Akincigil A, Matthews EB. National rates and patterns of depression screening in primary care: results from 2012 and 2013. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(7):660-666. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bhattacharjee S, Goldstone L, Vadiei N, Lee JK, Burke WJ. Depression screening patterns, predictors, and trends among adults without a depression diagnosis in ambulatory settings in the United States. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(10):1098-1100. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Siniscalchi KA, Broome ME, Fish J, et al. Depression screening and measurement-based care in primary care. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720931261. doi: 10.1177/2150132720931261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Office for Civil Rights. Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Health Information Privacy. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html. 2025. Accessed April 2025.
  • 34. Ramsey A, Lanzo E, Huston-Paterson H, Tomaszewski K, Trent M. Increasing patient portal usage: preliminary outcomes from the MyChart genius project. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Janett RS, Yeracaris PP. Electronic medical records in the american health system: challenges and lessons learned. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(4):1293-1304. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020254.28922019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606-613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Morris DW, et al. Concise health risk tracking scale: a brief self-report and clinician rating of suicidal risk. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(6):757-764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Berk M, Köhler-Forsberg O, Turner M, et al. Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(3):366-387. doi: 10.1002/wps.21110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Momen NC, Plana-Ripoll O, Agerbo E, et al. Association between mental disorders and subsequent medical conditions. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1721-1731. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Lichtman JH, Froelicher ES, Blumenthal JA, et al. Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and recommendations: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(12):1350-1369. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Park M, Katon WJ, Wolf FM. Depression and risk of mortality in individuals with diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(3):217-225. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zhu J, Fang F, Sjölander A, Fall K, Adami HO, Valdimarsdóttir U. First-onset mental disorders after cancer diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1964-1969. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Davidson AJ, Xu S, Oronce CIA, et al. Monitoring depression rates in an urban community: use of electronic health records. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018;24(6):E6-E14. doi: 10.1097/phh.0000000000000751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bruni T, LaLonde L, Maragakis A, et al. The use of electronic health record tools to improve evidence-based treatment of adolescent depression in primary care. Acad Pediatr. 2021;21(7):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Valuck RJ, Anderson HO, Libby AM, et al. Enhancing electronic health record measurement of depression severity and suicide ideation: a Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):582-593. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Davis M, Rio V, Farley AM, Bush ML, Beidas RS, Young JF. Identifying adolescent suicide risk via depression screening in pediatric primary care: an electronic health record review. Psychiatr Serv. 2021;72(2):163-168. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mayer MA, Gutierrez-Sacristan A, Leis A, De La Peña S, Sanz F, Furlong LI. Using electronic health records to assess depression and cancer comorbidities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:236-240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Coombes BJ, Landi I, Choi KW, et al. The genetic contribution to the comorbidity of depression and anxiety: a multi-site electronic health records study of almost 178 000 people. Psychol Med. 2023;53(15):7368-7374. doi: 10.1017/s0033291723000983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Fang Y, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B, Sen S, Richmond-Rakerd LS. Polygenic liability to depression is associated with multiple medical conditions in the electronic health record: phenome-wide association study of 46,782 individuals. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;92(12):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Niarchou M, Sanchez-Roige S, Reddy IA, Reese TJ, Marcovitz D, Davis LK. Medical and genetic correlates of long-term buprenorphine treatment in the electronic health records. Transl Psychiatry. 2024;14(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02713-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lester TR, Bannett Y, Gardner RM, Feldman HM, Huffman LC. Medication management of anxiety and depression by primary care pediatrics providers: a retrospective electronic health record study. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:794722. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.794722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Gill JM, Chen YX, Lieberman MI. Management of depression in ambulatory care for patients with medical co-morbidities: a study from a national electronic health record (EHR) network. Int J Psychiatr Med. 2008;38(2):203-215. doi: 10.2190/PM.38.2.g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Matthews EB, Akincigil A. The impact of electronic health record functions on patterns of depression treatment in primary care. Inform Health Soc Care. 2022;47(3):295-304. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1990933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Boakye M, Sharma M, Adams S, et al. Patterns and impact of electronic health records-defined depression phenotypes in spine surgery. Neurosurg. 2021;89(1):E19-E32. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Xu Z, Wang F, Adekkanattu P, et al. Subphenotyping depression using machine learning and electronic health records. Learn Health Syst. 2020;4(4):e10241. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Slezak J, Sacks D, Chiu V, et al. Identification of postpartum depression in electronic health records: validation in a large integrated health care system. JMIR Med Inform. 2023;11:e43005. doi: 10.2196/43005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wang S, Pathak J, Zhang Y. Using electronic health records and machine learning to predict postpartum depression. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:888-892. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Primary Care & Community Health are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES