Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Microbiology Reports logoLink to Environmental Microbiology Reports
. 2025 Nov 24;17(6):e70241. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.70241

Awareness of Microbiological Safety in Playgrounds Amid Rising Antibiotic Resistance

Rafał Łopucki 1, Marcin Skowronek 1, Anna Bilokinna 2, Guillermo Martinez‐de‐Tejada 3, Ilona Sadok 4,✉
PMCID: PMC12643047  PMID: 41284386

ABSTRACT

Playgrounds are a common feature in modern cities. Although guidelines addressing safety requirements for playground equipment have been established worldwide, none include recommendations concerning microbiological safety. Given the potential public health implications, there is a growing need to develop strategies for mitigating the risk of exposure to antibiotic‐resistant pathogens in playgrounds. The objective of this paper is to present the current state of knowledge through a systematic review of the literature, regarding microbiological safety in urban playgrounds, including an overview of the most commonly used research methodologies, the types of pathogens identified, the extent of antimicrobial resistance, and geographic differences. The review revealed significant gaps in knowledge on this topic: targeted empirical studies have been conducted relatively infrequently and only in a few countries worldwide. Even less frequently has the issue of antibiotic resistance in playground‐isolated bacteria been addressed. At the same time, antibiotic‐resistant strains represent an increasingly significant global public health concern, underscoring the need to develop global strategies to better protect playgrounds from resistant pathogens. Based on the findings, we present and discuss various factors that may influence microbiological safety in playgrounds, as well as strategies that can be implemented to address this critical issue.

Keywords: antibiotics, bacteria, children safety, Escherichia coli , sandboxes

Playgrounds are identified as reservoirs for antibiotic‐resistant bacteria, posing a potential public health risk. Despite the existence of safety regulations for playground equipment, microbiological safety is treated superficially. Global strategies, including hygiene practices and antibacterial materials, are needed to reduce the spread of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria on playgrounds.

graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g006.jpg

1. Introduction

A playground is defined as an area designed for children's play, including the site, natural features, built landscape, and any manufactured equipment and surfacing (Reedy 2024). Playgrounds are a common feature in modern cities, and their presence reflects the prioritisation of child well‐being and community welfare in urban planning and development strategies. In urban environments, playgrounds are considered essential for promoting the physical and mental health of children, providing them with a safe environment to explore and develop various skills (Ayan 2013; Błaszak and Zatoń 2015; Withagen and Caljouw 2017; Schipperijn et al. 2024). Additionally, in cities, playgrounds can serve as important community hubs, fostering social cohesion among families and neighbours. The playground area typically incorporates a variety of elements that offer a comprehensive play experience, contributing to the holistic development of children (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Commonly found playground equipment.

Playground component Visual description Trained ability
Swings graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g001.jpg Balance, coordination, sensory stimulation through motion
Slides graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g004.jpg Self‐confidence, spatial awareness and coordination
Climbing structures and monkey bars graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g011.jpg Upper body strength and coordination, problem‐solving skills, perseverance and resilience
Seesaws graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g008.jpg Balance, coordination and teamwork to achieve movement
Sandboxes graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g007.jpg Creativity, development of fine motor skills
Playhouses and forts graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g009.jpg Imaginative play, social interaction, communication skills, creativity
Spinning equipment graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g010.jpg Vestibular stimulation, balance and coordination
Balancing equipment graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g005.jpg Balance, core strength, enhancement of focus and concentration
Interactive panels graphic file with name EMI4-17-e70241-g003.jpg Cognitive development and problem‐solving abilities
Open in a new tab

Note: Images designed by Freepik (www.freepik.com).

1.1. Safety Requirements for Equipment and Surfacing

The diverse range of equipment found in playgrounds, combined with activities involving moving elements and elevated structures, can lead to various accidents resulting in injuries to children (Suminski et al. 2015; Tuckel and Milczarski 2018). Therefore, playground designers and managers pay special attention to safety measures to protect children. Guidelines addressing general safety requirements for playground equipment and surfacing have been established worldwide (Table 2). They cover appropriate equipment design, layout (including requirements for falling space, free space, and the impact area ‐ also known as the fall zone ‐ around the playground equipment), protection against falls and entrapment, and maintenance of protective surfacing to prevent playground‐related injuries and deaths. However, none of them include recommendations for parasitic or microbiological safety of playgrounds. Meanwhile, playgrounds, often considered safe spaces for children, can, in fact, serve as reservoirs for a variety of harmful bacteria, viruses, and fungi. These microorganisms can be transmitted through contact with contaminated surfaces, soil, water, or other children.

TABLE 2.

Safety requirements and test methods for playground equipment and surfacing.

Region Norm (year a ) Description Reference to microbiological safety issues
European countries EN 1176–1 (2017) Playground equipment and surfacing ‐ General safety requirements and test methods NO
EN 1176 2–6 (2017–2020) Playground equipment and surfacing ‐ Additional specific safety requirements and test methods for swings, slides, cableways, carousels, rocking equipment
EN 1176–7 (2020) Playground equipment and surfacing ‐ Guidance on installation, inspection, maintenance and operation
EN 1176–10 (2008) Playground equipment and surfacing ‐ Additional specific safety requirements and test methods for fully enclosed play equipment
EN 1176–11 (2014) Playground equipment and surfacing Additional specific safety requirements and test methods for spatial network
EN 1177 (2018) Impact attenuating playground surfacing. Methods of test for determination of impact attenuation
Russia GOST R 59010 (2020) Equipment and covering for playgrounds. Additional safety requirements and test methods for universal playground devices NO
TR EAEU 042/2017 (2017) The technical regulation of the Eurasian Economic Union on safety of children's playgrounds
Australia AS 4685.0 (2017) Playground equipment and surfacing – Development, installation, inspection, maintenance and operation NO
AS 4685.1–6 (2021) Playground equipment – General safety requirements and test methods. Additional specific requirements for swings; slides; runways; carousels; rocking equipment
AS 4685.11 (2012) Playground equipment – Additional specific safety requirements and test methods for spatial network
AS 4422 (2016) Playground surfacing – Specifications, requirements and test method
United States ASTM F1487 (2021) Standard consumer safety performance specification for playground equipment for public use NO
ASTM F2373 (2011) Standard consumer safety performance specification for public use play equipment for children 6 months through 23 months
ASTM F1292 (1999) Standard specification for impact attenuation of surface systems under and around playground equipment
ASTM F2075 (2020) Standard specification for engineered wood fibre for use as a playground safety surface under and around playground equipment
ASTM F2223 (2019) Standard guide for ASTM standards on playground surfacing
ASTM F2479 (2017) Standard guide for specification, purchase, installation and maintenance of poured‐in‐place playground surfacing
ASTM F1951 (2021) Standard specification for determination of accessibility of surface systems under and around playground equipment
United States ASTM F1816 (2018) Standard safety specification for drawstrings on children's upper outerwear
NO
ASTM F2049 (2000) Standard guide for fences/barriers for public, commercial, and multi‐family residential use outdoor play areas
ASTM F1148 (2022) Standard consumer safety performance specification for home playground equipment
ASTM F1918 (2021) Standard safety performance specification for soft contained play equipment
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: ASTM, American Society of Testing and Materials Standards.

a

Year of original adoption or last revision.

1.2. Microbiological and Parasitological Safety

Studies have reported that health and safety in playgrounds and public spaces are also associated with the presence of pathogenic microorganisms or parasites. For instance, playgrounds, particularly sandpits, can harbour Toxocara spp. eggs (Düwel 1984; Otero et al. 2018; Kuśmierek et al. 2020; Tyungu et al. 2020; Ristić et al. 2020; Lorenzo‐Rebenaque et al. 2023; Matras et al. 2023). Sandpits in playgrounds may also be contaminated with Toxoplasma gondii (Pacheco‐Ortega et al. 2019), which can be transmitted to humans through the ingestion of soil containing sporulated oocysts derived from feline faeces. Additionally, playing in playgrounds poses a risk of contracting cryptosporidiosis (Gharpure et al. 2019). Furthermore, several fungal species potentially harmful to children have also been detected in sandpits (Kaltseis et al. 2009; Jain and Sharma 2012; Wójcik et al. 2016; Glushakova et al. 2024), while pathogenic respiratory viruses have been identified in public spaces (Ikonen et al. 2018). Various bacterial pathogens have also been found on different playground elements (e.g., Pérez et al. 2010; Badura et al. 2014; Błaszak and Zatoń 2015; Thapaliya et al. 2019; Caliskan et al. 2021; Simanjuntak et al. 2023).

Children are particularly vulnerable to severe health consequences when exposed to the aforementioned parasites and pathogens due to their underdeveloped immune systems. The primary transmission pathways involve incidental hand‐to‐mouth, hand‐to‐nose, and hand‐to‐eye contact (Chatziprodromidou et al. 2021). Furthermore, during play, children may transfer microbial pathogens from their hands to playground equipment and vice versa (Martínez‐Bastidas et al. 2014). Examples of risk factors contributing to children's exposure to microbial pathogens in playgrounds are presented in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Main risk factors for children's exposure to microbial pathogens in playgrounds.

Despite these risks, the issue of microbiological safety for children on playgrounds is typically not governed by specific regulations. In most cases, the legal basis for hygiene requirements on playgrounds is derived from general regulations concerning the prevention and control of infections and communicable diseases in humans. For instance, in Poland (a member of the European Union), these matters are regulated by the Act (Dz. U. 2008 Nr 234, poz. 1570), which broadly stipulates that property owners, possessors, or managers are required to maintain their premises in proper sanitary and hygienic conditions to prevent infections and communicable diseases. Specifically, they must: (1) manage waste and sewage appropriately; (2) control rodents, insects, and pests; (3) remove dead animals from the property; and (4) clean up animal excrement. Although not explicitly stated, these regulations substantiate practices aimed at reducing pathogen transmission, such as regular sand replacement in sandboxes, cleaning of these areas, installation of fences to keep animals out of playgrounds, and inspections by the local Sanitary and Epidemiological Station.

1.3. Antimicrobial Resistance of Pathogenic Microorganisms as an Emerging Risk Factor

Microbiological hazards present in playgrounds have been significantly exacerbated in recent years by the spread of antimicrobial resistance among pathogenic microorganisms. Antimicrobial resistance occurs when bacteria develop mechanisms to survive exposure to drugs intended to eliminate them. The rise in antimicrobial resistance has been driven by several factors, including the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human medicine, veterinary practice, and agriculture (Podolsky 2018; WHO 2021). This has led to the selection of resistant strains of microorganisms that can persist in the presence of drugs that would normally inhibit their growth or eradicate them, allowing these strains to persist and spread, thereby complicating their removal from the environment (Akram et al. 2023).

The presence of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria in playgrounds means that common infections could potentially lead to more severe health outcomes, including prolonged illnesses, increased treatment costs, and a higher likelihood of complications (Salam et al. 2023). Moreover, a recent study suggests that patients colonised with antibiotic‐resistant bacteria (ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli ) may act as durable reservoirs for ongoing transmission of ESBLs, and that they are at prolonged risk of recurrent infection with colonising strains (Aguilar‐Bultet et al. 2023). However, it remains unclear whether bacteria with resistance mechanisms can survive longer than antibiotic‐sensitive strains on surfaces commonly found in playgrounds, and whether this consequently increases the risk of exposure for children.

1.4. Aim and Scope of the Literature Review

Given the potential public health implications, there is a growing need to develop strategies for mitigating the risk of exposure to antibiotic‐resistant pathogens in playgrounds. However, creating such strategies requires a comprehensive understanding of the issue based on scientific evidence. Therefore, the objective of this review is to present the current state of knowledge regarding microbiological safety in urban playgrounds, including an overview of the most commonly used research methodologies, the types of pathogens identified, the extent of antibiotic resistance, and geographic differences. This objective was achieved through a systematic review of the literature on microbiological studies conducted within playground areas.

Additionally, based on the general microbiology literature, we present and discuss various factors influencing microbiological safety in playgrounds, as well as strategies that can be implemented to enhance it.

2. Methods ‐ Literature Search and Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

To gather literature data on microbiological research conducted in playgrounds, the PRISMA method (Page et al. 2021) was employed. This method involves the preliminary identification of articles through selected databases, screening the results obtained, assessing their eligibility, and ultimately including them in the review.

A literature search was conducted using the scientific databases Scopus and PubMed. For the initial identification of articles, the search terms “playground” (or “playgrounds”) and “bacteria” were used. No time constraints were applied to the search results. In Scopus, the search was performed using the “title‐abstract‐keywords” option, while in PubMed, the “all fields” option was used. The search was carried out in October 2023 and subsequently refined in October 2025. The search yielded 151 records in Scopus and 112 records in PubMed.

The search results from both databases were combined, and duplicates were removed. Subsequently, using the title and abstract, all entries were assessed for relevance to the topic under consideration (i.e., articles specifically addressing empirical studies on the prevalence and/or characteristics of bacteria on playgrounds). The suitability of the selected articles was then finalized based on a full‐text review. Only articles published in English and in peer‐reviewed journals were included (i.e., grey literature, dissertations, and conference papers were excluded).

Ultimately, the selected pool of articles (15 items) was analysed for the chosen topics and summarised in tables discussed later in the text (Tables 3 and 4). Specifically, attention was given to which materials or surfaces were assessed for bacterial presence, which bacterial species were investigated, how frequently bacteria were found on the examined surfaces or materials, whether the bacteria were tested for antibiotic resistance, and, if so, which antimicrobial agents were used, as well as the geographical regions in which the studies were conducted.

TABLE 3.

Relevant epidemiological data obtained from publications on microbial safety of playgrounds.

Sample Sampling site Bacteria Ntotal Npositive (mean concentration) Positivity rate Country (city) References
Sand Sandboxes Escherichia coli 45 22 (2.6 × 103 CFU/g) 48.9% Austria (Graz) (Badura et al. 2014)
Coliform bacteria a 45 44 (3.0 × 104 CFU/g) 97.8%
Sand Sandboxes Enterococci 42 42 (111 MPN/g (d)) 100% USA (New York) (Leri et al. 2024)
Escherichia coli 42 42 (13 MPN/g (d)) 100%
Sand Sandboxes Escherichia coli 32 19 59.4% Poland (Szczecin, Gorzów Wielkopolski) (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015)
Coliform bacteria 32 26 81.3%
Sand Artificial beaches (areas of playground for children) Salmonella 18 0 — Poland (Szczecin) (Zatoń and Błaszak 2015)
Escherichia coli 18 2 11.1%
Coliform bacteria b 18 10 55.6%
Sand Sandboxes Clostridium difficile (current official name—Clostridioides difficile) 40 21 52.5% Spain (Madrid) (Orden et al. 2017)
Sand Playground zone Escherichia coli 140 N.a. (129.96 CFU/g (d), 6.1 × 103 CFU/g (w)) N.a. Greece (Patras and Pyrgos) (Chatziprodromidou et al. 2021)
Staphylococcus aureus 140 N.a. (0 CFU/g (d), 5.06 × 103 CFU/g (w)) N.a.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 140 N.a. (32.81 CFU/g (d), 691.781 CFU/g (w)) N.a.
Soil (sand, gravel, loam, clay) Playground surface (swings, slides) Salmonella 79 24 30.4% USA (Island of Guam) (Haddock and Nocon 1986)
Soil Playground surface Helicobacter pylori 78 7 9% Spain (Barcelona) (Pérez et al. 2010)
Soil Playground area Escherichia coli 140 17 12.1% Turkey (Ankara) (Caliskan et al. 2021)
Swab Playground equipment Staphylococcus aureus 280 89 31.8% USA (Northeast Ohio) (Thapaliya et al. 2019)
Swab Playground equipment Staphylococcus aureus 355 10 2.81% Hungary (16 cities) (Horváth et al. 2024)
Swab Slides, swings, wheels, seesaws, other toys Escherichia coli 414 23 5.6% Turkey (Ankara) (Caliskan et al. 2021)
Swab Children's hands Gram‐negative bacteria c 160 65 40.6% Germany (Göttingen) (Simanjuntak et al. 2023)
180 97 53.9% Indonesia (Medan)
171 114 66.7% Indonesia (Siberut)
Swab Playground slides Acinetobacter pittii 39 2 5.1% Northern Jordan (Ababneh et al. 2022)
Wild‐bird faecal samples Playground area Campylobacter spp. 200 35 17.5% Iran (Mashhad) (Abdollahpour et al. 2015)
Canine faecal samples Playground area Escherichia coli 50 20 40.0% Ecuador (Quito) (Ortega‐Paredes et al. 2019)
Open in a new tab
a

Klebsiella pneumoniae , Klebsiella oxytoca , Citrobacter freundii , Enterobacter amnigenus , Enterobacter aerogenes , Serratia marcescens .

b

Not specified.

c

Enterobacterales, Pseudomonadales, and others; MPN ‐ most probable number of microorganisms; n.a. ‐ data not available; d ‐ dry season; w ‐ wet season.

TABLE 4.

Antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus isolates from playground elements and surfacing.

Agents Escherichia coli Staphylococcus aureus
Sample type: soil Sample type: swab Sample type: sand Sample type: swab Sample type: swab
(n = 17) (n = 23) (n = 96) (n = 10) (n = 280)
Amikacin (AK)

R (0%)

I (5.8%)

S (94.2%)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (AMC) — —

R/I (9.4%)

S (90.6%)

 — —
Ampicillin (AMP)

R (11.7%)

I (0%)

S (88.3%)

R (21.8%)

I (4.3%)

S (73.9%)

R/I (12.5%)

S (87.5%)

 — —
Aztreonam (ATM)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (4.3%)

S (95.7%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Cefepime (FEP) — —

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Cefotaxime (CTX)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (4.3%)

S (95.7%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Cefoxitin (FOX) — —

R/I (3.1%)

S (96.9%)

R (0%)

S (100%)

 —
Ceftazidime (CAZ)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (4.3%)

S (95.7%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Cefuroxime (CXM) — —

R/I (3.1%)

S (96.9%)

 — —
Chloramphenicol (CHL) — —

R/I (2.1%)

S (97.9%)

 — —
Ciprofloxacin (CIP)

R (0%)

I (5.8%)

S (94.2%)

R (8.7%)

I (8.7%)

S (82.6%)

R/I (1%)

S (99%)

R (40%)

S (60%)

 —
Clindamycin (DA) — — —

R (20%)

S (80%)

 —
Ertapenem (ETP)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

 — — —
Erythromycin (ERY) — — —

R (20%)

S (80%)

 —
Fosfomycin (FOS) — —

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Gentamycin (CN)

R (0%)

I (88.3%)

S (11.7%)

R (8.7%)

I (91.3%)

S (0%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

S (100%)

 —
Imipenem (IPM)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Levofloxacin (LEV) — — —

R (0%)

S (100%)

 —
Meropenem (MEM)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Moxifloxacin (MXF) — —

R/I (2.1%)

S (97.9%)

 — —
Nalidixic acid (NAL) — —

R/I (4.2%)

S (95.8%)

 — —
Oxacillin (OX) — — —

R (0%)

S (100%)

R (3.9%)

S (96.1%)
Penicillin (PCN) — — —

R (20%)

S (80%)

 —
Piperacillin (PIP) — —

R/I (10.4%)

S (89.6%)

 — —
Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TPZ)

R (0%)

I (0%)

S (100%)

R (0%)

I (8.7%)

S (91.3%)

R/I (5.2%)

S (94.8%)

 — —
Streptomycin (STR)

R (17.6%)

I (64.7%)

S (17.6%)

R (8.7%)

I (73.9%)

S (17.4%)

 — — —
Tetracycline (TET) — —

R/I (6.3%)

S (93.7%)

R (0%)

S (100%)

 —
Tigecycline (TGC) — —

R/I (0%)

S (100%)

 — —
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (SXT)

R (5.8%)

I (0%)

S (94.2%)

R (21.8%)

I (0%)

S (78.2%)

 — — —
Tobramycin (TOB)

R (0%)

I (100%)

S (0%)

R (8.7%)

I (91.3%)

S (0%)

 — —
Vancomycin (VAN) — — —

R (0%)

S (100%)

 —
Ref. (Caliskan et al. 2021) (Caliskan et al. 2021) (Badura et al. 2014) (Horváth et al. 2024) (Thapaliya et al. 2019)
The location of the studies Turkey Turkey Austria Hungary USA
Open in a new tab

Note: I ‐ intermediate susceptibility; R ‐ resistant; S ‐ sensitive.

3. Results ‐ Current Knowledge on Microbiological Safety of Playgrounds

The systematic literature review revealed that the topic of microbiological safety in playgrounds is rarely addressed, with only 15 relevant articles identified. The earliest studies on this topic found in the analysed databases date back to 1986, while the most recent are from 2025.

Geographic distribution of research sites worldwide is presented in Figure 2. As shown, studies have been conducted only in certain countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America. Data from many regions of the world are lacking, highlighting the significant need for a more comprehensive global assessment of this phenomenon.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Global distribution of countries with published data on playground‐associated bacteria.

3.1. Types of Samples Analysed

Most studies focus on analysing only selected sites within the playground areas, while there is a significant lack of research that comprehensively maps the distribution of microorganisms across entire playgrounds. The most commonly analysed samples are sand from sandboxes (Badura et al. 2014; Zatoń and Błaszak 2015; Orden et al. 2017; Chatziprodromidou et al. 2021) or soil (Haddock and Nocon 1986; Pérez et al. 2010; Caliskan et al. 2021). Less frequently, swabs are taken from the surfaces of playground equipment (Thapaliya et al. 2019; Ababneh et al. 2022; Caliskan et al. 2021). Very rarely, other types of samples are examined, such as those collected directly from the bodies of playground users (e.g., children's hands) (Simanjuntak et al. 2023) or faecal samples from animals (wild birds and canines) found on playgrounds (Abdollahpour et al. 2015; Ortega‐Paredes et al. 2019) (Table 3 and Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Number of publications reporting data on playground‐associated microbes, classified by sample origin. Data are based on (Table 3).

3.2. Laboratory Procedures

The collected samples were typically analysed using standard laboratory procedures commonly employed in microbiology. These procedures included culturing bacteria isolated from the environment, plating them on selected microbiological media, isolating single colonies, conducting species identification and testing for antimicrobial susceptibility.

A common procedure involved using enrichment culturing, which consists of pre‐cultivating the collected samples on nutrient‐rich standard growth media, followed by inoculating the obtained bacteria on appropriate selective media (Badura et al. 2014; Caliskan et al. 2021; Ababneh et al. 2022). Another frequently used approach was to inoculate the collected samples directly onto appropriate selective media, such as Burkholderia cepacia selective agar for Burkholderia cepacia (Miller et al. 2002) or CHROMagar Staph aureus for Staphylococcus aureus (Horváth et al. 2024). If isolation of single bacterial colonies was not required, culturing was omitted, and the organism was identified directly from collected samples by real‐time PCR assays. This is the method used to identify Helicobacter pylori (Pérez et al. 2010), Chlamydophila spp. and Salmonella spp. (Tarsitano et al. 2010). Studies that included preliminary bacterial isolation onto appropriate media often used PCR‐based methods for molecular identification (Miller et al. 2002; Thapaliya et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2020; Ababneh et al. 2022; Horváth et al. 2024). In more recent reports, MALDI‐TOF‐based procedures were increasingly used (Badura et al. 2014; Ortega‐Paredes et al. 2019; Caliskan et al. 2021; Simanjuntak et al. 2023), whereas older studies sometimes relied on biochemical test kits for bacterial identification (Davis et al. 1999; Ayan 2013).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was usually performed using the disk diffusion method (Badura et al. 2014; Ortega‐Paredes et al. 2019; Caliskan et al. 2021; Ababneh et al. 2022) or the VITEK 2 automated system (BioMérieux) (Badura et al. 2014; Thapaliya et al. 2019; Chatziprodromidou et al. 2021). Other techniques, such as the agar dilution method or those involving ETEST strips (BioMerieux), were used less frequently (Orden et al. 2017; Horváth et al. 2024).

3.3. The Most Commonly Studied Bacterial Taxa

Most studies focus on confirming specific bacterial taxa, estimating contamination frequency, or measuring bacterial load. The representativeness of these results depends largely on sample size, which was substantial ‐ reaching hundreds of repetitions ‐ in only a few studies (e.g., Caliskan et al. 2021) (Table 3).

The most frequently studied bacteria were potentially pathogenic species that could pose health risks to playground users (Table 3). These bacteria included (in alphabetical order): Acinetobacter pittii, Campylobacter spp., Clostridium difficile, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Helicobacter pylori, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus.

Acinetobacter pittii is not considered as highly pathogenic as the closely related, carbapenem‐resistant strains of A. baumannii . Nevertheless, A. pittii is increasingly associated with several types of severe hospital infections and is becoming an emergent pathogen of concern (Bello‐López et al. 2024). The emergence of carbapenem resistance in A. pittii is particularly worrisome.

Campylobacter spp. (primarily C. jejuni ) and Clostridium difficile cause gastrointestinal diseases that can lead to serious diarrheal infections. Campylobacter infections are one of the two most common causes of foodborne illness in the United States, with children under 5 years of age being particularly at risk. The most common illness caused by C. jejuni is gastroenteritis, which can lead to severe complications, including reactive arthritis and Guillain‐Barré syndrome (Same and Tamma 2018).

C. difficile is the pathogen most commonly responsible for healthcare‐associated diarrhoea. This organism can colonise the large intestine under specific conditions (e.g., after broad‐spectrum antibiotic therapy), causing varying degrees of damage, from mild diarrhoea to toxic megacolon (Dop et al. 2023). A particularly problematic feature of C. difficile is its ability to produce heat‐resistant and aero‐tolerant spores, which allows it to persist on surfaces for several months (Rexach et al. 2006). This pathogenic trait significantly increases the risk of infection in public places such as playgrounds.

Enterococcus faecalis is a natural inhabitant of the human gut microbiota, but when immune suppression occurs, it can cause a variety of pathologies, including urinary tract infections, endocarditis, septicemia, and wound infections. Because E. faecalis develops resistance to many common antibiotics, treating these diseases is often challenging (Singh et al. 2019).

Although Escherichia coli is a common constituent of the human gastrointestinal microbiota, pathogenic variants of this organism can cause various diseases, including diarrhoea, urinary tract infections, sepsis, and meningitis (Kaper et al. 2004). Diarrheal disease caused by pathogenic E. coli variants leads to high mortality, especially among children under 5 years of age in sub‐Saharan African and South Asian countries (Croxen et al. 2013).

Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium that colonises the gastric mucosa and, although often asymptomatic, is the leading cause of peptic ulcers and gastritis worldwide. Persistent colonisation of H. pylori in adults increases the risk of stomach cancer, while early infections of this pathogen in children are associated with nodular gastritis (Mehrabani 2019).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen associated with severe infections, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections, wound infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and ear infections. These bacteria are among the most important etiological agents of pneumonia in children under 12 years of age. Due to multiple complementary antibiotic resistance mechanisms, they cause high morbidity and mortality (Chen et al. 2018; Sathe et al. 2023).

Salmonella species cause foodborne illnesses manifested by gastroenteritis with diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and fever. The main representative is S. enterica , a species comprising more than 2600 serotypes, including those causing typhoid fever or paratyphoid fever (Chen et al. 2023).

Staphylococcus aureus causes a wide range of infections, from skin abscesses and endocarditis to respiratory infections and severe bloodstream infections. Methicillin‐resistant strains pose a particular threat due to their resistance to standard antibiotics (Tong et al. 2015). These bacteria are among the 15 antibiotic‐resistant species listed by the World Health Organization (WHO 2024) as causative agents of acute infections that pose high risks of mortality and morbidity.

3.4. Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria Collected From Playgrounds

The antibiotic resistance profile of bacteria isolated from playgrounds has been rarely studied. Table 4 summarises data from publications that have addressed this issue. The studies are compared according to the antibiotics used and the level of susceptibility of the bacteria tested. Notably, susceptibility to each specific antibiotic varied significantly depending on the location of the study. In this respect, it would be interesting to investigate a possible correlation between antibiotic use in each particular country and the level of resistance to that agent displayed by bacterial isolates. The most frequently tested isolates, E. coli , exhibited resistance to ampicillin (12%–22%), ciprofloxacin (0%–8.7%), gentamycin (0%–8.7%), streptomycin (8.7%–17.6%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (5.8%–21.8%). No resistance was detected to amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ertapenem, fosfomycin, imipenem, meropenem, or tigecycline (Table 4). In the case of S. aureus , the highest prevalence of MRSA was found in swabs from crawl tunnels (15%), spring riders (11.1%), and slide edges (10.5%) (Thapaliya et al. 2019). Strains isolated from playground elements also showed resistance to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and penicillin (Horváth et al. 2024) (Table 4).

4. Factors Influencing Microbiological Safety in Playgrounds

Studies indicate that playgrounds can harbour potentially pathogenic bacteria, some of which may exhibit varying degrees of antibiotic resistance. It is reasonable to assume that, even if the overall level of bacterial contamination in playgrounds remains constant at current levels, the proportion of antibiotic‐resistant strains will continue to increase. This is due to the growing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the environment, with various sources and transmission vectors being continually identified. In light of this, the following sections examine the factors that may contribute to the elevated presence of bacteria on playgrounds, thereby impacting the microbiological safety of playground users.

4.1. Influence of Material Type and Surface Characteristics on Microbial Contamination

The selection of construction materials is a critical factor influencing the microbiological safety of playgrounds, as bacterial survival and affinity for different materials vary widely and depend primarily on surface energy and charge, topography, and wettability (Wilks et al. 2005; Tomičić et al. 2020; Iyer et al. 2023). For examples, surfaces with moderate wettability, rough topography, and higher surface energy are more prone to bacterial attachment and cell accumulation, whereas smoother and less porous materials generally support lower microbial loads (Yuan et al. 2017).

Although loosely attached microbes are readily removed by shear forces and swept away, they become tightly bound to the surface through the secretion of extracellular polymeric substances (mainly exopolysaccharides). The subsequent formation of a microbial biofilm ensures an irreversible attachment to the material surface (Cookson et al. 2002). Biofilm composition varies among microbial species, and the abiotic surface properties may trigger different colonisation mechanisms (Iyer et al. 2023). Many biofilms are sufficiently thick to be visible to the naked eye, but their formation on the playground equipment and surfaces could lead to disease transmission. Furthermore, biofilms are challenging to remove and exhibit increased resistance to antimicrobial agents compared with planktonic bacteria. The application of surfacing and materials with antibacterial properties or poor bacterial adherence characteristics could help prevent cross‐contamination events during play if standard hygiene practices fail.

Different construction materials commonly used in playgrounds ‐ such as metals, plastics, and wood ‐ differ considerably in their susceptibility to microbial colonisation, biofilm formation, and long‐term pathogen survival. A brief overview of these materials in the context of microbiological safety is presented below.

4.1.1. Metals

Stainless steel ‐ either coated or painted ‐ is commonly used for slide surfaces, fasteners, and structural components. However, E. coli and Salmonella spp. can adhere to both stainless steel, and E. coli is capable of surviving on stainless steel for over 28 days at both 20°C and 4°C (Merritt et al. 2000; Carvalho et al. 2023; Wilks et al. 2005). While stainless steel offers excellent mechanical strength and corrosion resistance, it lacks intrinsic antimicrobial properties. In contrast, copper possess antibacterial properties against various microorganisms, including E. coli and MRSA (Wilks et al. 2005; Salah et al. 2021). However, it exhibits poor corrosion resistance and limited durability making it unsuitable as a surface material for outdoor applications (Wilks et al. 2005). Copper‐containing alloys (such as brass, bronze, copper‐nickel, and copper‐silver alloys) also demonstrate antimicrobial activity (depending on their copper content) and are more suitable for general use due to enhanced durability and corrosion resistance (Salah et al. 2021).

4.1.2. Plastics

UV‐stabilised high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) and rotationally moulded low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) are widely employed for activity panels, signs, slides, and tubes due to their durability, resistance to corrosion, low maintenance requirements, and favourable aesthetic properties. Nevertheless, these polyethylene surfaces are also prone to microbial contamination (Merritt et al. 2000; Carvalho et al. 2023; Wilks et al. 2005).

4.1.3. Wood

It is considered an environmentally friendly material commonly used in city parks and playgrounds. Bacteria such as E. coli , P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus can adhere to wooden surfaces, but differences have been observed depending on the test strain and type of wood (Tomičić et al. 2020). It was also shown that wood treated with a combination of oil (bioimpregnation agent) and a disinfectant enhances the adhesion of P. aeruginosa on the beech surfaces while inhibiting the attachment of E. coli and S. aureus (Tomičić et al. 2020). Notably, some wood types exhibit antibacterial and antifungal properties, likely due to their chemical composition (Vainio‐kaila et al. 2015). For example, pine extracts have demonstrated strong antibacterial effects against methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE), and Streptococcus pneumoniae but weaker on E. coli (Vainio‐kaila et al. 2015). Thus, the application of this type of wood in a playground environment may offer additional hygienic benefits.

4.2. Influence of Green Spaces and Wildlife on Playground Microbiological Safety

Urban green spaces provide opportunities for socialisation and have a positive effect on the well‐being of their visitors (Ayala‐Azcárraga et al. 2019). This is likely due to the presence of trees and natural sounds, which contribute to stress reduction and improved mood, for example, by creating a pleasant environment (Ayala‐Azcárraga et al. 2019). Access to nature improves children's psychological well‐being and encourages environmental stewardship (Reedy 2024). The presence of natural elements in playgrounds also encourages children to develop risk management skills and adapt their behaviour to the surroundings (Reedy 2024). Consequently, any feature that promotes contact with nature ‐ such as environmental elements, natural shapes, and forms ‐ is becoming increasingly popular in modern playground design (Russo and Andreucci 2023). Maintaining natural substrates is also important, as replacing natural soil with artificial materials (rubber mats) alters the microbial balance of play environments (Manninen et al. 2025).

Conversely, green areas harbour greater animal diversity (e.g., pigeons, rats, mice, squirrels, or dogs and cats), which may serve as reservoirs or transmitters of diseases, not to mention the pet owners who may also act as vectors of zoonotic illnesses such as skin and nail fungal infections, diarrhoea, salmonellosis, toxocarosis and toxoplasmosis (Haddock and Nocon 1986; Abdollahpour et al. 2015; Otero et al. 2018; Pacheco‐Ortega et al. 2019). Additionally, the presence of dense vegetation may favour the accumulation of garbage on the site (Ayala‐Azcárraga et al. 2019), whereas contamination of sand in playground areas or sandpits with animal faeces or dead animals increases the risk of infection with parasites (Otero et al. 2018; Pacheco‐Ortega et al. 2019) and Salmonella, respectively (Haddock and Nocon 1986).

Furthermore, multidrug‐resistant E. coli were isolated from animal faeces collected from playground zones (Ortega‐Paredes et al. 2019). Thus, enclosing the playground with fencing is generally required to protect it from animals (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015). Food waste and garbage, however, attract animals and promote bacterial and fungal growth, as they provide organic compounds for these microorganisms (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015; Zatoń and Błaszak 2015). Despite installing fences and nets, certain animals (e.g., cats, birds, dogs) still have occasional access to the playground area. However, these physical barriers reduce pollution derived from waste and plant material in the sandpits (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015). Interestingly, studies on the microbiological safety of sandpits revealed that the presence of fencing, shading, nearby aquatic habitats and contamination with waste or animal faeces does not fully account for the presence of E. coli and coliform bacteria in sand samples (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015; Caliskan et al. 2021). However, in unfenced sandpits, a significantly higher number of bacteria and fungi were detected compared with the fenced ones (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015).

4.3. Influence of Ambient Conditions and Environmental Factors on Microbial Survival

Ambient conditions influence the survival of microbiomes outside their host environment. Faecal bacteria such as Enterococcus spp. and E. coli exhibit varying abilities to cope with environmental stressors such as large fluctuations in temperature and pH, salinity, sunlight, and limited nutrient availability (Halliday and Gast 2011). Sudden changes in moisture are stressful for microorganisms, which must expend energy to regulate osmotic pressure in their microenvironment (Scoullos et al. 2019). It was also demonstrated that exposure to light promotes the die‐off of E. coli on the surface of dark‐coloured urban materials (such as rubber and asphalt) and sand due to temperature increases (Scoullos et al. 2019). In contrast, UV irradiation for up to 6 min. does not destroy E. coli in a 30 cm deep sand plot (Beversdorf et al. 2007). Furthermore, this organism can survive for several weeks in the sand, especially at lower temperatures (15°C) (Staley et al. 2016). These observations are in line with data reporting a lower survival rate of E. coli at higher temperatures (Scoullos et al. 2019).

It has also been documented that faecal bacteria persist longer in wet sand than in water (Halliday and Gast 2011). Furthermore, the number of bacteria and fungi in sand may vary widely throughout the year and depend on climate conditions. In Greece, a higher number of E. coli , P. aeruginosa , and S. aureus in soil collected in the playground zone was reported during the wet season (temperature about 9°C) compared with the dry one (temperature about 48°C) (Chatziprodromidou et al. 2021). In contrast, in Poland (Central Europe), a similar content of bacteria and fungi was detected both in spring and autumn in sand from fenced sandpits. On the other hand, monitoring of unfenced sandpits revealed higher contamination levels with bacteria and fungi in autumn compared with spring (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015). In line with this observation, higher bacterial and fungal loads were determined in autumn than in springtime in sand collected from the playground zone of Polish artificial beaches (Zatoń and Błaszak 2015). Finally, factors such as air temperature and water content appear not to influence the concentration of E. coli in sand, whereas sand's water content affects coliform bacteria's content (Zatoń and Błaszak 2015).

Concerning microbial adhesion, both humidity and temperature significantly affect the ability of microorganisms such as P. aeruginosa , E. coli , S. aureus , and the yeast Pichia membranifaciens to adhere to wooden surfaces (Tomičić et al. 2020). Notably, the highest degree of adhesion to this biomaterial was observed at a relative humidity of 98% and temperatures ranging from 20°C to 37°C for bacteria, or from 20°C to 27°C for yeast (Tomičić et al. 2020).

4.4. Operational Factors ‐ Children's Age‐Related Behaviour and Play Preferences

When playing in public areas, children acquire microbial contamination from soil, toys, and other fomites, as well as from their playmates. Children themselves contribute to the contamination of playground equipment and surfaces with their own microbiota, transferring microorganisms from the soles of their shoes, hands, and other body parts to their surroundings (Błaszak and Zatoń 2015). Furthermore, during play, opportunistic and pathogenic microorganisms are transferred from soil to children's hands and toys and vice versa (Martínez‐Bastidas et al. 2014). Thus, surfaces frequently touched by children's hands should be considered important transmission points of resistant bacteria between humans.

Undoubtedly, children's age plays an important role when evaluating risk factors for exposure to microbial pathogens. In fact, children engage in age‐specific activities in playgrounds (Simanjuntak et al. 2023). Specifically, children aged 1–10 years are more prone to exposure to microbial pathogens (e.g., bacteria causing diarrhoea and/or nosocomial infections), as they tend to explore and seek new experiences. Furthermore, toddlers require special attention due to their high activity levels and oral exploratory behaviour, which increases the likelihood of ingesting contaminants (including soil and faeces) during crawling (Simanjuntak et al. 2023; Cantrell et al. 2023). For example, a study conducted in Greece showed that children aged 6–9 have a higher risk of infection by certain pathogens ‐ P. aeruginosa  >  E. coli  >  S. aureus ‐ when playing in the playground for 1 h each day (Chatziprodromidou et al. 2021).

Importantly, children's preferences for certain playground materials also influence their exposure to microbes. Survey data indicate that children aged 5–12 years favour plastic elements, followed by wood rather than metal, in play zones (Kus Sahin and Onay 2020). As a result, surfaces made of plastic and wood are more frequently touched and contacted, potentially increasing the likelihood of microbial contamination and transmission.

Hands are important intermediaries in the transmission of faecal indicator bacteria as well as enteric and opportunistic pathogens such as E. coli , faecal coliforms, enterococci, adenovirus, and norovirus (Cantrell et al. 2023). The presence of Giardia lamblia cysts, faecal coliforms, E. coli , S. aureus , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Salmonella spp., and Serratia spp. has been detected on the hands and toys of children playing in parks and/or on sidewalks (Martínez‐Bastidas et al. 2014). In another study, the highest burden of hand contamination with Gram‐negative bacteria was observed in children aged 1–4 and 5–9 years, compared with younger (< 1 year) and older children (10–14 years) (Simanjuntak et al. 2023). In this study, Pseudomonas species were the predominant organisms. It was also demonstrated that E. coli strains isolated from swab samples of different playground equipment (slides, swings, ferris wheels, seesaws) exhibited higher resistance rates to antibiotics such as ampicillin, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, and streptomycin than isolates obtained from soil samples (Caliskan et al. 2021).

4.5. Hand Hygiene and Education

Education, living conditions, and hygiene‐related practices are examples of factors influencing children's exposure to faecal bacteria (Simanjuntak et al. 2023). There is a higher prevalence of hand contamination with E. coli and faecal coliforms in low‐income countries than in high‐income countries (Cantrell et al. 2023), which can be at least partially attributed to differences in access to handwashing facilities. Interestingly, no significant differences in the prevalence of E. coli and faecal coliforms between the hands of children under 5 years old and adult hands have been reported, suggesting similar hand hygiene practices in adults and children (Cantrell et al. 2023).

5. Strategies for Improving Microbiological Safety in Playgrounds

Determination of new strategies against antibiotic resistance requires intersectoral collaboration and efforts encompassing all possible opportunities for science and technology. Cleaning with water, soap (or a neutral detergent), and some form of mechanical action (brushing or scrubbing) removes and reduces dirt, debris, and other organic matter, but does not necessarily eliminate microorganisms (WHO 2020). Classical methods such as chemical disinfection and sterilisation are used to remove pathogens, but environmental protection calls for alternative approaches (Isopencu and Mocanu 2022). Thus, the development of antibacterial materials for personal protection and environmental security has rapidly progressed to address the problem of the spread of multidrug‐resistant bacteria (Luo et al. 2021). These materials are designed either to exhibit bactericidal activity (killing microorganisms) or to display bacteriostatic properties (preventing their attachment, survival, growth, and biofilm formation) (Mahanta et al. 2021).

According to available standards (Table 2), materials with good shock‐absorbing capacity, low toxicity, and a suitable level of protection against corrosion and insect intrusion are preferable for playground applications. Although it is well documented that bacterial accumulation onto surfaces occurs in almost any environment (Cookson et al. 2002), recommendations for selecting materials with good antibacterial properties or low affinity for microbial attachment and biofilm formation have not been included in any legal norm.

One of the current trends is the fabrication of antibacterial polymeric materials by combining various microbicidal agents such as N‐halamine, antibiotics, nitric oxide, natural essential oils, and quaternary ammonium compounds (Luo et al. 2021). These materials can be produced using different synthesis strategies and then manufactured into products such as nanoparticles, fibres, membranes, or coatings (Luo et al. 2021). In particular, antibacterial coatings have been applied to various substrates, including stainless steel, to prevent bacterial colonisation (Luo et al. 2021) and might be useful for outdoor applications. Furthermore, the organic biocides could be replaced by nanomaterials with antimicrobial activity such as silver, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide (Ganguli and Chaudhuri 2021). For instance, silver nanoparticles have been shown to inhibit or reduce microbially induced degradation of household paints, gypsum, grout and other outdoor assets (da Silva et al. 2019; Ganguli and Chaudhuri 2021).

Despite the ability of biocidal polymers to inactivate bacteria, the accumulation of debris from dead microorganisms can facilitate secondary contaminations. Therefore, materials with antifouling properties are also desirable for playground surfacing (Luo et al. 2021). Among these, antifouling paints ‐ commonly used to prevent the attachment and growth of marine organisms on ship and boat hulls ‐ typically contain copper or zinc as biocides (Lagerström et al. 2020). However, leaching of these biocides from coating to the environment is a real threat (Lagerström et al. 2020). Furthermore, there is concern that not only antibiotics but also heavy metals and biocides contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance through co‐selection mechanisms (Flach et al. 2017). For example, biofilm bacteria collected from plastic panels painted with a copper and zinc‐containing antifouling pigment have shown increased resistance to both heavy metals and tetracycline (Flach et al. 2017).

While advances in the development of new construction and surface materials for playgrounds contribute to improved microbiological safety, these technological solutions should be complemented by effective hygiene practices and targeted educational interventions. Practicing effective hand‐washing techniques by children might significantly reduce the risk of diarrheal disease in children (Cantrell et al. 2023). Moreover, cleaning and disinfecting toys and playground equipment might be crucial to reducing microbial dispersion. Many non‐hazardous and non‐toxic products (also with biodegradable ingredients) effective for cleaning or disinfecting surfaces (including children's toys) are available commercially (Jimenez et al. 2010). Detergents with enzymes and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) have also been found to be effective at removing pathogenic organisms from contaminated surfaces (Cookson et al. 2002).

6. Conclusions

A systematic literature review revealed that targeted empirical studies on the presence of pathogenic bacteria in playgrounds have been conducted relatively infrequently and in only a few countries worldwide. Even less frequently has the issue of antibiotic resistance in playground‐isolated bacteria been addressed. We highlight significant gaps in knowledge regarding this topic and the lack of dedicated legal regulations governing microbiological safety on playgrounds.

However, existing data clearly indicate that pathogenic bacteria, from various species, are present in areas where children play and that these bacteria can exhibit diverse antibiotic resistance traits. Given that antibiotic‐resistant strains represent an increasingly serious global public health issue, there is a need to develop global strategies to better protect playgrounds from resistant pathogens. We propose that the most common and globally applicable approach would be the introduction and use of appropriate materials with antibacterial properties. This recommendation stems, in part, from the fact that various environmental factors responsible for increasing bacterial loads cannot always be fully controlled. Finally, we also emphasize the importance of hygiene practices and public education regarding existing risks, without discouraging the use of playgrounds by children.

Author Contributions

Rafał Łopucki: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition. Marcin Skowronek: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, formal analysis. Anna Bilokinna: writing – review and editing, formal analysis. Guillermo Martinez‐de‐Tejada: writing – review and editing, formal analysis. Ilona Sadok: investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, data curation, funding acquisition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The project was financed by the Minister of Education and Science and the Minister of Science and Higher Education of Poland under the program “Student Science Clubs Create Innovations” (SKN/SP/570395/2023 and SKN/SN/630602/2025).

Łopucki, R. , Skowronek M., Bilokinna A., Martinez‐de‐Tejada G., and Sadok I.. 2025. “Awareness of Microbiological Safety in Playgrounds Amid Rising Antibiotic Resistance.” Environmental Microbiology Reports 17, no. 6: e70241. 10.1111/1758-2229.70241.

Funding: This work was supported by Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki, SKN/SP/570395/2023. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, SKN/SN/630602/2025.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ababneh, Q. , Abu Laila S., and Jaradat Z.. 2022. “Prevalence, Genetic Diversity, Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Formation of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated From Urban Environments.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 133: 3617–3633. 10.1111/jam.15795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdollahpour, N. , Zendehbad B., Alipour A., and Khayatzadeh J.. 2015. “Wild‐Bird Feces as a Source of Campylobacter jejuni Infection in Children's Playgrounds in Iran.” Food Control 50: 378–381. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.09.00. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguilar‐Bultet, L. , García‐Martín A., Vock I., et al. 2023. “Within‐Host Genetic Diversity of Extended‐Spectrum Beta‐Lactamase‐Producing Enterobacterales in Long‐Term Colonized Patients.” Nature Communications 14: 8495. 10.1038/s41467-023-44285-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akram, F. , Imtiaz M., and ul Haq I.. 2023. “Emergent Crisis of Antibiotic Resistance: A Silent Pandemic Threat to 21st Century.” Microbial Pathogenesis 174: 105923. 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayala‐Azcárraga, C. , Diaz D., and Zambrano L.. 2019. “Characteristics of Urban Parks and Their Relation to User Well‐Being.” Landscape and Urban Planning 189: 27–35. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayan, S. 2013. “The Hidden Danger for the Users of Playgrounds and Sport Complexes.” Life Science Journal 10: 2884–2890. [Google Scholar]
  7. Badura, A. , Luxner J., Feierl G., et al. 2014. “Prevalence, Antibiotic Resistance Patterns and Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli From Austrian Sandpits.” Environmental Pollution 194: 24–30. 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bello‐López, E. , Escobedo‐Muñoz A. S., Guerrero G., et al. 2024. “ Acinetobacter pittii : The Emergence of a Hospital‐Acquired Pathogen Analyzed From the Genomic Perspective.” Frontiers in Microbiology 15: 1412775. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1412775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beversdorf, L. , Bornstein‐Forst S., and McLellan S.. 2007. “The Potential for Beach Sand to Serve as a Reservoir for Escherichia Coli and the Physical Influences on Cell Die‐Off.” Applied Microbiology 102: 1372–1381. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Błaszak, M. , and Zatoń K.. 2015. “Effectiveness of the Sandpits Security System Against Microorganisms and Intestinal Parasites Sand Contamination.” Journal of Ecological Engineering 16: 215–223. 10.12911/22998993/59376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Caliskan, D. , Bakkaloğlu Z., Numanoglu Cevik Y., Suzuk Yildiz S., and Kaskatepe B.. 2021. “Maldi‐TOF MS Identification and Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli Isolated From Playground.” Microbial Pathogenesis 159: 105155. 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cantrell, M. , Sylvestre E., Wharton H., et al. 2023. “Hands Are Frequently Contaminated With Fecal Bacteria and Enteric Pathogens Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” ACS Environmental Au 3: 123–134. 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carvalho, D. , Chitolina G., Wilsmann D., et al. 2023. “Adhesion Capacity of Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia Coli and Campylobacter jejuni on Polystyrene, Stainless Steel, and Polyethylene Surfaces.” Food Microbiology 114: 104280. 10.1016/j.fm.2023.104280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chatziprodromidou, I. P. , Chatziantoniou S., Vantarakis G., and Vantarakis A.. 2021. “Risk Factor Analysis of Children's Exposure to Microbial Pathogens in Playgrounds.” Risk Analysis 42: 334–343. 10.1111/risa.13752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, H. , Qiu H., Zhong H., Cheng F., Wu Z., and Shi T.. 2023. “Non‐Typhoidal Salmonella Infections Among Children in Fuzhou, Fujian, China: A 10‐Year Retrospective Review From 2012 to 2021.” Infection and Drug Resistance 16: 2737–2749. 10.2147/IDR.S408152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, J. , Chen Y., Hu P., Zhou T., Xu X., and Pei X.. 2018. “Risk Assessment of Infected Children With Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia by Combining Host and Pathogen Predictors.” Infection, Genetics and Evolution 57: 82–87. 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, P. , Wang D., Ren O., et al. 2020. “ Bacillus Aerolatus sp. Nov., Isolated From Bioaerosols in a School Playground.” Archives of Microbiology 202: 2373–2378. 10.1007/s00203-020-01955-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cookson, A. L. , Cooley W. A., and Woodward M. J.. 2002. “The Role of Type 1 and Curli Fimbriae of Shiga Toxin‐Producing Escherichia coli in Adherence to Abiotic Surfaces.” International Journal of Medical Microbiology 292: 195–205. 10.1078/1438-4221-00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Croxen, M. , Law R., Scholz R., Keeney K., Wlodarska M., and Finlay B.. 2013. “Recent Advances in Understanding Enteric Pathogenic Escherichia coli .” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 26: 822–880. 10.1128/CMR.00022-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. da Silva, G. , Guidelli E., de Queiroz‐Fernandes G., Chaves M. R., Baffa O., and Kinoshita A.. 2019. “Silver Nanoparticles in Building Materials for Environment Protection Against Microorganisms.” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 16: 1239–1248. 10.1007/s13762-018-1773-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Davis, S. G. , Corbitt A. M., Everton V. M., et al. 1999. “Are Ball Pits the Playground for Potentially Harmful Bacteria?” Pediatric Nursing 25: 151–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dop, D. , Marcu I., Padureanu V., et al. 2023. “ Clostridium difficile Infection in Pediatric Patients (Review).” Biomedical Reports 20: 18. 10.3892/br.2023.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Düwel, D. 1984. “The Prevalence of Toxocara Eggs in the Sand in Children's Playgrounds in Frankfurt/M.” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 78: 633–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Flach, C.‐F. , Pal C., Svensson C., et al. 2017. “Does Antifouling Paint Select for Antibiotic Resistance?” Science of the Total Environment 590: 461–468. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ganguli, P. , and Chaudhuri S.. 2021. “Nanomaterials in Antimicrobial Paints and Coatings to Prevent Biodegradation of Man‐Made Surfaces: A Review.” Materials Today: Proceedings 45: 3769–3777. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gharpure, R. , Perez A., Miller A., Wikswo M., Silver R., and Hlavsa M.. 2019. “Cryptosporidiosis Outbreaks ‐ United States, 2009‐2017.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 68: 568–572. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6825a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Glushakova, A. , Rodionova E., and Kachalkin A.. 2024. “Evaluation of Opportunistic Yeasts Candida Parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis in Topsoil of Children's Playgrounds.” Biologia 79: 1585–1597. 10.1007/s11756-024-01643-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Haddock, R. , and Nocon F.. 1986. “ Salmonella Contamination of Soil in Children's Play Areas on Guam.” Journal of Environmental Health 49: 158–160. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44536255. [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, E. , and Gast R.. 2011. “Bacteria in Beach Sands: An Emerging Challenge in Protecting Coastal Water Quality and Bather Health.” Environmental Science & Technology 45: 370–379. 10.1021/es102747s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Horváth, A. , Tormássi Á., Hajósi‐Kalcakosz S., Huber A., Sahin‐Tóth J., and Dobay O.. 2024. “High Clonal Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates From Children's Playgrounds in Hungary.” Scientific Reports 14: 10021. 10.1038/s41598-024-60481-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ikonen, N. , Savolainen‐Kopra C., Enstone J., et al. 2018. “Deposition of Respiratory Virus Pathogens on Frequently Touched Surfaces at Airports.” BMC Infectious Diseases 18: 437. 10.1186/s12879-018-3150-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Isopencu, G. , and Mocanu A.. 2022. “Recent Advances in Antibacterial Composite Coatings.” Coatings 12: 1504. 10.3390/coatings12101504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Iyer, D. , Laws E., and LaJeunesse D.. 2023. “ Escherichia coli Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Polymeric Nanostructured Surfaces.” ACS Omega 8: 47520–47529. 10.1021/acsomega.3c04747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jain, N. , and Sharma M.. 2012. “Biodiversity of Keratinophilic Fungal Flora in University Campus, Jaipur, India.” Iranian Journal of Public Health 41: 27–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jimenez, M. , Martinez C. I., and Chaidez C.. 2010. “Disinfection Alternatives for Contact Surfaces and Toys at Child Care Centers.” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 20: 387–394. 10.1080/09603123.2010.491851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaltseis, J. , Rainer J., and De Hoog G.. 2009. “Ecology of Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium Species in Human‐Dominated and Natural Environments and Their Distribution in Clinical Samples.” Medical Mycology 47: 398–405. 10.1080/13693780802585317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaper, J. , Nataro J., and Mobley H.. 2004. “Pathogenic Escherichia coli .” Nature Reviews. Microbiology 2: 123–140. 10.1038/nrmicro818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kus Sahin, C. , and Onay B.. 2020. “Alternative Wood Species for Playgrounds Wood From Fruit Trees.” Wood Research 65: 149–160. 10.37763/wr.1336-4561/65.1.149160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuśmierek, N. , Babecka M., Osak O., and Popiołek M.. 2020. “Occurrence of Geohelminths in the Soil of Children's Playgrounds and Green Areas in the City of Wrocław, Poland.” Annals of Parasitology 66: 231–236. 10.17420/ap6602.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lagerström, M. , Ytreberg E., Wiklund A.‐K. E., and Granhag L.. 2020. “Antifouling Paints Leach Copper in Excess ‐ Study of Metal Release Rates and Efficacy Along a Salinity Gradient.” Water Research 186: 116383. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Leri, A. , Fassihi G., Lundquist M., Khan M., and Arguin M.. 2024. “Vertical Stratification and Seasonality of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in New York City Playground Sandboxes.” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 273: 16152. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lorenzo‐Rebenaque, L. , López‐Fernández S., Marco‐Jiménez F., et al. 2023. “Zoonotic Parasites in Playgrounds in Southern Spain: A One Health Approach.” Microorganisms 10: 721. 10.3390/microorganisms11030721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo, H. , Yin X.‐Q., Tan P.‐F., Gu Z.‐P., Liu Z.‐M., and Tan L.. 2021. “Polymeric Antibacterial Materials: Design, Platforms and Applications.” Journal of Materials Chemistry B 9: 2802–2815. 10.1039/D1TB00109D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mahanta, U. , Khandelwal M., and Deshpande A.. 2021. “Antimicrobial Surfaces: A Review of Synthetic Approaches, Applicability and Outlook.” Journal of Materials Science 56: 17915–17941. 10.1007/s10853-021-06404-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Manninen, J. , Saarenpää M., Roslund M., Galitskaya P., and Sinkkonen A.. 2025. “Microbial Communities on Dry Natural Rocks Are Richer and Less Stressed Than Those on Man‐Made Playgrounds.” Microbiology Spectrum 13: e01930‐24. 10.1128/spectrum.01930-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Martínez‐Bastidas, T. , Castro‐del Campo N., Mena K., Castro‐del Campo N., León‐Félix J., and Gerba C. C.. 2014. “Detection of Pathogenic Micro‐Organisms on Children's Hands and Toys During Play.” Journal of Applied Microbiology 116: 1668–1675. 10.1111/jam.12473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Matras, A. , Stasiak A., Chmielewski T., and Kaczmarek A.. 2023. “Testing of Sand From Recreational Areas and Sandpits in Warsaw, for Presence of Ascaris Lumbricoides and Toxocara spp.” Przegla̧d Epidemiologiczny 77: 53–58. 10.32394/pe.77.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mehrabani, S. 2019. “ Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children: A Comprehensive Review.” Maedica 14: 292–297. 10.26574/maedica.2019.14.3.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Merritt, K. , Hitchins V. M., and Brown S. A.. 2000. “Safety and Cleaning of Medical Materials and Devices.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 53: 131–136. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller, S. C. M. , LiPuma J. J., and Parke J. L.. 2002. “Culture‐Based and Non‐Growth‐Dependent Detection of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex in Soil Environments.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68: 3750–3758. 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3750-3758.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Orden, C. , Neila C., Blanco J. L., et al. 2017. “Recreational Sandboxes for Children and Dogs Can Be a Source of Epidemic Ribotypes of Clostridium difficile .” Zoonoses and Public Health 65: 88–95. 10.1111/zph.12374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ortega‐Paredes, D. , Haro M., Leoro‐Garzón P., et al. 2019. “Multi‐Drug Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated From Canine Feces in a Public Park in Quito, Ecuador.” Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 18: 263–268. 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Otero, D. , Alho A., Nijsse R., Roelfsema J., Overgaauw P., and Madeira de Carvalho L.. 2018. “Environmental Contamination With Toxocara spp. Eggs in Public Parks and Playground Sandpits of Greater Lisbon, Portugal.” Journal of Infection and Public Health 11: 94–98. 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pacheco‐Ortega, G. A. , Chan‐Pérez J. I., Ortega‐Pacheco A., et al. 2019. “Screening of Zoonotic Parasites in Playground Sandboxes of Public Parks From Subtropical Mexico.” Journal of Parasitology Research 2019: 7409076. 10.1155/2019/7409076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Page, M. , McKenzie J., Bossuyt P., et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 372: 1–9. 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pérez, L. M. , Codony F., López Leyton D., Fittipaldi M., Adrados B., and Morató J.. 2010. “Quantification of Helicobacter pylori Levels in Soil Samples From Public Playgrounds in Spain.” Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 11: 27–29. 10.1631/jzus.B0900238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Podolsky, S. 2018. “The Evolving Response to Antibiotic Resistance (1945‐2018).” Palgrave Communications 4: 124. [Google Scholar]
  58. Reedy, A. 2024. “A Guide to the Australian Playground Standards.” https://www.natureplaywa.org.au/wp‐content/uploads/2021/02/Guide‐to‐the‐2021‐Playground‐Standards.pdf.
  59. Rexach, C. , Tang‐Feldman Y., Cantrell M., and Cohen S.. 2006. “Epidemiologic Surveillance of Clostridium difficile Diarrhea in a Freestanding Pediatric Hospital and a Pediatric Hospital at a University Medical Center.” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 56: 109–114. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ristić, M. , Miladinović‐Tasić N., Dimitrijević S., et al. 2020. “Soil and Sand Contamination With Canine Intestinal Parasite Eggs as a Risk Factor for Human Health in Public Parks in Niš (Serbia).” Helminthologia 57: 109–119. 10.2478/helm-2020-0018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Russo, A. , and Andreucci M.. 2023. “Raising Healthy Children: Promoting the Multiple Benefits of Green Open Spaces Through Biophilic Design.” Sustainability 15: 1982. 10.3390/su15031982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Salah, I. , Parkin I., and Allan E.. 2021. “Copper as an Antimicrobial Agent: Recent Advances.” RSC Advances 11: 18179–18186. 10.1039/D1RA02149D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Salam, M. , Al‐Amin M., Salam M., et al. 2023. “Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health.” Healthcare (Basel) 11: 1946. 10.3390/healthcare11131946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Same, R. , and Tamma P.. 2018. “Campylobacter Infections in Children.” Pediatrics in Review 39: 533–541. 10.1542/pir.2017-0285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sathe, N. , Beech P., Croft L., Suphioglu C., Kapat A., and Athan E.. 2023. “ Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Infections and Novel Approaches to Treatment “Knowing the Enemy” the Threat of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Exploring Novel Approaches to Treatment.” Infectious Medicine 2: 178–194. 10.1016/j.imj.2023.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Schipperijn, J. , Madsen C., Toftager M., et al. 2024. “The Role of Playgrounds in Promoting Children's Health – A Scoping Review.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 21: 72. 10.1186/s12966-024-01618-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Scoullos, I. M. , Lopez Vazquez C. M., van de Vossenberg J., and Brdjanovic D.. 2019. “Die‐Off of E. coli as Fecal Indicator Organism on Different Surfaces After Urban Floods.” Journal of Environmental Management 250: 109516. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Simanjuntak, D. F. , Kusumawati R. L., Bader O., Lüder C. G. K., Zimmermann O., and Groß U.. 2023. “A Comparative Pilot Study on Gram‐Negative Bacteria Contaminating the Hands of Children Living in Urban and Rural Areas of Indonesia Versus Germany – A Suitable Monitoring Strategy for Diarrhea Risk Assessment?” Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1152411. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1152411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Singh, H. , Das S., Yadav J., Srivastava V., Jyoti A., and Kaushik S.. 2019. “In Search of Novel Protein Drug Targets for Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Infections.” Chemical Biology & Drug Design 94: 1721–1739. 10.1111/cbdd.13582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Staley, Z. R. , Robinson C., and Edge T. A.. 2016. “Comparison of the Occurrence and Survival of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Recreational Sand Between Urban Beach, Playground and Sandbox Settings in Toronto, Ontario.” Science of the Total Environment 541: 520–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Suminski, R. , Presley T., Wasserman J., Mayfield C., McClain E., and Johnson M.. 2015. “Playground Safety Is Associated With Playground, Park, and Neighborhood Characteristics.” Journal of Physical Activity & Health 12: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Tarsitano, E. , Greco G., Decaro N., et al. 2010. “Environmental Monitoring and Analysis of Faecal Contamination in an Urban Setting in the City of Bari (Apulia Region, Italy): Health and Hygiene Implications.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7: 3972–3986. 10.3390/ijerph7113972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Thapaliya, D. , Kadariya J., Capuano M., et al. 2019. “Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus Aureus and Methicillin‐Resistant S. aureus on Children's Playgrounds.” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 38: e43–e47. 10.1097/INF.0000000000002095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tomičić, R. , Tomičić Z., Thaler N., Humar M., and Raspor P.. 2020. “Factors Influencing Adhesion of Bacteria Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus Aureus and Yeast Pichia Membranifaciens to Wooden Surfaces.” Wood Science and Technology 54: 1663–1676. 10.1007/s00226-020-01222-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tong, S. , Davis J., Eichenberger E., Holland T., and Fowler V.. 2015. “ Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management.” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 28: 603–661. 10.1128/CMR.00134-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tuckel, P. , and Milczarski W. S.. 2018. “Injuries Caused by Falls From Playground Equipment in the United States.” Clinical Pediatrics 57: 563–573. 10.1177/0009922817732618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tyungu, D. , McCormick D., Lau C., et al. 2020. “ Toxocara Species Environmental Contamination of Public Spaces in New York City.” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14: e0008249. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Vainio‐kaila, T. , Kyyhkynen A., Rautkari L., and Siitonen A.. 2015. “Antibacterial Effects of Extracts of Pinus Sylvestris and Picea abies Against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia Coli, and Streptococcus pneumoniae .” BioResources 10: 7763–7771. 10.15376/BIORES.10.4.7763-7771. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. WHO . 2020. “Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces in the Context of COVID‐19.” https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/332096/WHO‐2019‐nCoV‐Disinfection‐2020.1‐eng.pdf?sequence=1.
  80. WHO . 2021. “Antimicrobial Resistance Fact Sheet.” World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/docs/default‐source/antimicrobial‐resistance/amr‐factsheet.pdf.
  81. WHO . 2024. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wilks, S. , Michels H., and Keevil C.. 2005. “The Survival of Escherichia coli O157 on a Range of Metal Surfaces.” International Journal of Food Microbiology 105: 445–454. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Withagen, R. , and Caljouw S.. 2017. “Aldo Van Eyck's Playgrounds: Aesthetics, Affordances, and Creativity.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1130. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wójcik, A. , Błaszkowska J., Kurnatowski P., and Góralska K.. 2016. “Sandpits as a Reservoir of Potentially Pathogenic Fungi for Children.” Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 23: 542–548. 10.5604/12321966.1226843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Yuan, Y. , Hays M., Hardwidge P., and Kim J.. 2017. “Surface Characteristics Influencing Bacterial Adhesion to Polymeric Substrates.” RSC Advances 7: 14254–14261. 10.1039/C7RA01571B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zatoń, K. , and Błaszak M.. 2015. “The Microbiological and Sanitary State of Sand in the Municipal Bathing Beach in Szczecin.” Journal of Ecological Engineering 15: 40–45. 10.12911/22998993/60452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Environmental Microbiology Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES