Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 12;16:1612215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1612215

Table 2.

Physicians' perspectives on GenAI in clinical practice.

Statement Strongly disagree No. (%) Disagree No. (%) Neutral No. (%) Agree No. (%) Strongly agree No. (%)
Physicians’ perceptions of GenAI
GenAI will be a useful tool to increase the time physicians have for patient interaction. (N=289) 13 (4.50) 20 (6.92) 66 (22.84) 129 (44.64) 61 (21.11)
GenAI will be a useful tool to support empathetic care. (N=289) 29 (10.03) 70 (24.22) 102 (35.29) 58 (20.07) 30 (10.38)
GenAI and the patient-physician relationship
Physicians' use of genAI will positively affect patients' trust in their clinical decisions. (N=281) 18 (6.41) 66 (23.49) 129 (45.91) 48 (17.08) 20 (7.12)
Physicians' use of genAI will enhance the development of a strong patient-physician relationship. (N=281) 18 (6.41) 68 (24.20) 126 (44.84) 50 (17.79) 19 (6.76)
Physicians' use of genAI can augment the placebo effect, by increasing patient confidence in their treatment. (N=281) 19 (6.76) 70 (24.91) 128 (45.55) 54 (16.93) 10 (3.56)
GenAI in clinical decision-making and patient interaction
GenAI in clinical settings (eg., generative AI chatbots) can aid patients in selecting treatments. (N=263) 10 (3.80) 45 (17.11) 90 (34.22) 104 (39.54) 14 (5.32)
The placebo effect could be elicited through genAI-human interaction alone (eg., chatbots) ie., without the physician. (N=261) 17 (6.51) 68 (26.05) 105 (40.23) 63 (24.14) 8 (3.07)
Concerns regarding GenAI integration in patient care
Are you concerned about the advances and integration of genAI into the healthcare system? (N=265) 21 (7.92) 63 (23.77) 100 (37.74) 61 (23.02) 20 (7.55)