Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 25;16:2159. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03935-9

Table 3.

Associations with overall survival and clinicopathologic characteristics in TCGA patients using Cox regression, and results of proportional hazards (PH) assumption testing

Characteristics Total (N) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p-value PH test p-value HR (95% CI) p-value PH test p-value
Gender Male vs Female 1.180 (0.885–1.574) 0.261 0.695 0.695
Weight > 70 vs < = 70 0.649 (0.389–1.083) 0.098 0.769 0.769
Height >= 170 vs < 170 0.855 (0.556–1.316) 0.477 0.161 0.161
BMI > 25 vs < = 25 0.827 (0.513–1.333) 0.436 0.346 0.346
Tumor tissue site Trunk vs Extremities 0.945 (0.697–1.283) 0.719 0.068 0.068
Head and Neck vs Extremities 1.276 (0.760–2.143) 0.357
Other vs Extremities 2.113 (1.097–4.067) 0.025
Radiation therapy Yes vs No 0.980 (0.696–1.381) 0.909 0.055 0.055
Age > 60 vs < = 60 1.663 (1.256–2.201) < 0.001 0.854 1.088 (0.751–1.576) 0.654 0.854
Pathologic T stage T2 vs T1 1.523 (0.826–2.806) 0.178 0.695 2.079 (0.933–4.630) 0.073 0.695
T3 vs T1 2.135 (1.179–3.867) 0.012 1.704 (0.745–3.897) 0.207
T4 vs T1 3.780 (2.109–6.776) < 0.001 2.994 (1.094–8.192) 0.033
Pathologic N stage N1 vs N0 1.503 (1.018–2.220) 0.04 0.769 1.619 (1.007–2.603) 0.047 0.769
N2 vs N0 1.540 (0.977–2.429) 0.063 2.424 (1.349–4.358) 0.003
N3 vs N0 2.744 (1.777–4.236) < 0.001 3.952 (2.201–7.097) < 0.001
Pathologic M stage M1 vs M0 1.902 (1.032–3.506) 0.039 0.161 1.362 (0.521–3.560) 0.528 0.161
Breslow depth > 3 vs < = 3 2.665 (1.948–3.644) < 0.001 0.346 1.333 (0.688–2.584) 0.394 0.346
Melanoma ulceration Yes vs No 2.099 (1.506–2.927) < 0.001 0.591 1.316 (0.883–1.963) 0.178 0.591
Global PH test 0.282