Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 25;13(11):e7281. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007281

Table 1.

Two Risk Assessment Tools for Sternal Complications After Cardiac Surgery: (1) Deep Sternal Wound Dehiscence Risk Score and (2) MUST Score

Deep Sternal Wound Dehiscence Risk Score MUST Score
Variable (points) Variable (points)
BMI, kg/m2 BMI, kg/m2
 <26 (0)  >35 (4)
 26–29 (2)  25–35 (1)
 30–37 (4) Sex
 >38 (7)  Male (1)
Sex Diabetes
 Male (0)  Noninsulin-dependent (1)
 Female (4)  Insulin-dependent (2)
HbA1c Smoking
 <5.7 (0)  Current (2)
 5.7–6.6 (2)  Former (1)
 6.7–9 (3) COPD (1)
 >9 (8) Age > 60 y (2)
Current or recent smoker Reexploration (5)
 No (0) Operative duration > 300 min (1)
 Yes (2) Previous cardiac operation >6 mo (−1)
PVD
 No (0)
 Yes (3)
Creatinine
 ≤1.2 (0)
 >1.2 (1)
Score interpretation: Score interpretation:
 0–7: Minimal risk  0–4: Low risk
 → Standard closure (wires)  Single wires
 8–10: Low risk  5–7: Intermediate risk (<1%)
 → Standard closure with incisional wound VAC  Special wiring method
 11–13: Intermediate risk  8–10: High risk (<5%)
 → Incisional wound VAC + enhanced closure (SRPF) at clinician’s discretion if:  Wires + bands or SRPF
  • Mechanical concerns (eg, macromastia, morbid obesity, barrel chest)  11–13: Very high risk (<15%)
  • Poor bone quality  SRPF
 14–25: High risk  14–18: Extremely high risk (<30%)
 → Incisional wound VAC + strongly consider enhanced closure (SRPF)  SRPF

Both scores provide risk categories with corresponding recommended interventions.

HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; VAC, vacuum-assisted closure.