Abstract
The pervasive presence of microplastics and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the environment has raised growing concerns regarding their potential health impacts. While research has progressively revealed the toxicological effects of MNPs, limited attention has been given to their specific influence on the cardiovascular system, particularly in human models. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on MNP-induced cardiotoxicity, highlighting both physiological outcomes and underlying mechanisms.
A total of 72 studies—including in vivo experiments on aquatic species and rodents, and in vitro assays on human cardiovascular cells—were analyzed. The findings consistently demonstrate that MNPs can impair cardiac function by altering heart rate, inducing pericardial edema, and promoting myocardial fibrosis. These effects are mediated by mechanisms such as oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and disruptions in cellular signaling pathways.
Toxicity outcomes vary based on particle characteristics (type, size, and surface chemistry), exposure dose and duration, organismal factors (age, sex, species), and co-exposure to other pollutants. Notably, smaller particles (< 100 nm) exhibit greater bioaccumulation and systemic penetration, correlating with higher cardiovascular toxicity.
Despite growing evidence, standardized protocols for evaluating MNP cardiotoxicity remain lacking, and human-based data are scarce. This review underscores the urgent need for long-term, mechanistic studies and regulatory frameworks to assess cardiovascular risks posed by environmental MNPs. Advancing this research frontier is critical to understanding the public health implications of chronic plastic particle exposure.
Graphical abstract
Keywords: Microplastics, Nanoplastic, Cardiovascular, Fibrosis
Introduction
Plastic is one of the most important goods in modern civilization [1–3]. It is a material with very lightweight, very long life, is cheap price, and contains many properties with wide applications worldwide [4, 5]. From bottle caps to dolls, cosmetics to electronics, and chocolate wrappers to food packages, the kingdom of plastic has spread everywhere [6, 7]. Most of these plastics are left in the environment without decomposition and are turned into smaller pieces due to environmental factors such as weathering or photodegradation [8, 9]. Pieces of plastic smaller than 5 mm are called micro- and nano-plastics (MNPs) [10, 11]. This term was first mentioned in 2004, and since then, many researchers have been interested in researching these particles [2]. MNPs are divided into two general groups, primary and secondary [12, 13]. Primary MPs are plastics that are produced in micro and nano sizes [8]. The secondary type is obtained from the fragmentation of large plastics into smaller pieces. MNPs are found in various forms such as spheres, fibers, irregular shapes, pellets, and fragments [14]. Research shows that MNPs have been found in Air, seas [15], beaches [16], deserts [17], snow [18], and rainwater [19], animal bodies [20, 21], and humans [22].
Ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact are among the main routes of human exposure to MNPs. The presence of MNPs in the human body has led to increasing concerns about health risks. Their presence in the human body has been reported in colectomy samples [23], saliva [24], lung tissue [25, 26], liver, kidney [27], breast milk, feces, urine, and human heart arteries [28]. Studies show that long-term contact with MNPs can have destructive effects on the functioning of the immune and hormonal systems, the thyroid gland, and the cardiovascular system, as well as causing oxidative stress and cell disorders [29–32]. However, human studies still require further work and a definitive determination of relevant health effects.
A wide range of studies on animal and human cell models show the effect of these MNPs on the cardiovascular system [33–35]. The term heart disease is usually used to refer to a heart attack, however, heart disease includes other heart diseases such as coronary artery disease, heart failure [36],, cardiac arrhythmia, and [37, 38]. Despite rapid advances in diagnosis and treatment, one-third of heart attack patients still die, and two-thirds of those who survive never fully recover and return to normal life [39]. These diseases impose a huge cost on the healthcare systems of the countries. However, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the most preventable non-communicable diseases of humans. Nearly 18 million people died due to cardiovascular diseases in 2016 [40]. Factors such as smoking, drinking alcohol, diabetes, high blood pressure, and stress are risk factors for CVDs [41, 42]. But researchers also consider other factors to be involved, such as unhealthy diet, inactivity, and air pollution [43]. In addition, scientists are establishing a link between MNPs and cardiovascular risk factors. For example, studies have shown the effect of these particles on abnormal blood velocity [44], decreased cardiac output [45], altered heart rate (HR) [46], and Myocardial fibrosis [47], have reported.
These effects depend on the shape and size and structural characteristics, duration of exposure, and dose of exposure to MNPs [48]. Based on global statistics, more than 8 billion tons of plastic have been produced in the world since 1950. The problem is that the leap in plastic production is increasing every year and has now reached 400 million tons per year. This increasing growth is alarming.
In the last decade, plastic waste pollution has been twice as much as in the previous decade. Estimates show that this amount will increase to three times by 2060. According to these statistics, some harmful consequences may appear in the cardiovascular systems of humans and animals. In vitro and in vivo studies investigated the potential risks of MNPs for the cardiovascular system. However, there are gaps regarding the adverse effects of MNPs on the cardiovascular system and the behavior of these particles [49]. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically investigate the potential effects of MNPs on cardiovascular toxicity and CVDs in humans. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the problems caused by MNPs on cardiovascular toxicity.
Materials and methods
In this literature, on 04-03-2024, a search was made from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the following keywords. This systematic review was completed by the PRISMA statement [50] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram
PubMed: (“microplastic*“[Title/Abstract] OR “nanoplastic*“[Title/Abstract] OR “Microplastics“[MeSH Terms]) AND (“Cardiovascular system“[Title/Abstract] OR “Cardiovascular Diseases“[MeSH Terms] OR “Cardiotoxicity“[MeSH Terms] OR “Cardiovascular toxicity“[Title/Abstract] OR “Cardiovascular health“[Title/Abstract] OR “Heart“[Title/Abstract] OR “Heart“[MeSH Terms])
Web of science: (TS=(microplstic* OR nanoplastic*)) AND (TS=(“ Cardiovascular system " OR " Cardiovascular Diseases *” OR " Cardiotoxicity " OR " Cardiovascular toxicity " OR " Cardiovascular health " OR " Heart “)).
Scopus: TITLE-ABS-KEY (microplastic* OR nanoplastic*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Cardiovascular system " OR " Cardiovascular Diseases " OR " Cardiotoxicity " OR " Cardiovascular toxicity " OR " Cardiovascular health " OR " Heart “).
A total of 415 articles were initially retrieved from the mentioned databases. After removing 153 duplicate articles using software tools, the authors conducted a more detailed screening. This process led to the exclusion of 71 review articles, 12 editorial notes, comments, and letters, as well as non-English articles. Following the evaluation of titles and abstracts, 94 articles were deemed irrelevant as they focused on pollutants other than MNPs affecting the cardiac system or the effects of MNPs on organs other than the heart and blood vessels.
Inclusion criteria
Peer-reviewed original studies published in English.
Studies investigating the cardiovascular effects (e.g., cardiotoxicity, arrhythmia, blood pressure, myocardial damage) of microplastics and/or nanoplastics (MNPs).
In vivo studies conducted on aquatic animals, terrestrial animals, or rodents.
In vitro studies using human or mammalian cardiovascular-related cells (e.g., cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells).
Studies that report dose, duration, and particle characteristics (size, type, concentration) of MNP exposure.
Studies published between January 2000 and March 2024.
Exclusion criteria
Review articles, meta-analyses, editorials, letters to the editor, and conference abstracts.
Non-English publications.
Studies focusing solely on non-cardiovascular outcomes (e.g., reproductive, hepatic, or neurological effects) without reporting cardiovascular endpoints.
Articles evaluating plastic-associated chemicals (e.g., phthalates, BPA) without direct exposure to MNPs.
Studies with unclear methodology, lacking adequate data on MNP characteristics or experimental design.
From the initial pool of 415 articles, after removing duplicates and irrelevant studies, 72 articles specifically addressing the impact of MNPs on the cardiovascular system were selected for review(Fig. 1). These studies were categorized as follows:
-
In Vivo Studies on Aquatic Animals (43 studies):
These studies primarily focused on the exposure of various aquatic species to MNPs. The findings indicated that MNPs can cause significant cardiovascular stress in these animals, leading to inflammation, oxidative stress, and tissue damage in the heart and blood vessels.
-
In Vivo Studies on Mice (22 studies):
Research on mice revealed that exposure to MNPs can result in increased blood pressure, atherosclerosis, and arrhythmias. The studies also showed that MNPs can induce oxidative stress and inflammation, which are critical factors in the development of cardiovascular diseases.
-
In Vitro Studies on Human Cells (7 studies):
These studies examined the effects of MNPs on cultured human cardiovascular cells. The results demonstrated that MNPs can cause cellular damage, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses in heart cells, which may contribute to the development of cardiovascular diseases.
Overall, the review highlights the potential cardiovascular risks associated with MNPs exposure, emphasizing the need for further research to fully understand the mechanisms and long-term effects of MNPs on human health.
Results and discussion
Toxic effects of MPs on the cardiovascular system
MNPs pose significant risks to the cardiovascular system. Once they enter the bloodstream, these minute particles can reach the heart and blood vessels, leading to inflammation and tissue damage. Research indicates that MPs can contribute to higher blood pressure, the development of atherosclerosis, and irregular heart rhythms. Furthermore, MPs in the body can cause oxidative stress, harming heart cells and thereby elevating the likelihood of cardiovascular diseases.
Impact of MPs on aquatic animals and terrestrial animals’ heart rate
Alterations in heart rate, including both bradycardia and tachycardia, are among the earliest and most consistent physiological responses observed in aquatic species exposed to micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) [51–56]. These effects are particularly evident in zebrafish (Danio rerio) models, where PS-NPs and MPs disrupt normal cardiac rhythms through multiple interconnected pathways (Table 1).
Table 1.
Impact of MPs on the cardiovascular of aquatic animals
| Species | Type | Size | Dose | Duration | Impact | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zebrafish embryo | PE | - | 25, 50, 100, 200 µg/ml | 96 hpf |
NOAEL is 50 µg/mL Severe pericardial edema Increase NOAEL: decrease CO, decrease blood flow velocity Decrease angiogenesis |
[45] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 700 nm | - | 24 h | Accumulation in heart | [57] |
| Zebrafish (Danio rerio) | PS | 10 nm | 0.04, 34 ng L-1, and 34 µg L-1 | 144 h | Decrease HR | [52] |
| Zebrafish | Polylactic acid | 5–50 μm | 0.1, 1, 10, and 25 mg/L | 90 days |
Oxidative stress Myocyte damage |
[58] |
| Zebrafish embryo | Polyacrylonitrile microfibers | 60 μm | 10 µg/L, 100 µg/L, 1 mg/L, and 10 mg/L | 7 days |
Increase HR Pericardial edema |
[59] |
| Marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma) | PS | 10 μm | 2, 20, and 200 mg/L | 60 days | Decrease HR of the offspring | [60] |
| Zebrafish embryo | PS | 1 μm, 3 μm | 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mgL-1 | 72 h |
Increase HR Phenotypic changes |
[61] |
| D. magna | PS | 2.0–2.9 μm | 15 mg/L |
Acute dietary exposure:72 h chronic dietary exposure:21days |
Increase HR Induced oxidate stress |
[62] |
| Cyprinus carpio (carp) | PS | 1–10 μm | 1000 ng/L | 21 days | Myocardial tissue damage via the TLR4 \NF-κB pathway | [63] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 42 nm | 0.1, 1 and 10 mg/mL | 5 days | Decreased HR | [64] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 100 nm | (0, 100, 200, and 400 mg/L) | 96 h | Decrease HR | [55] |
| Carp | PS | 50 nm, 100 nm and 400 nm | 1000 µg/L | 28 days |
Induced oxidative stress Induced inflammation and apoptosis |
[65] |
| Zebrafish (Danio rerio) | PS, PCB | 80 nm | PS (0.2 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 5 mg/L)- PCB (0.01 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L, 1 mg/L) | 24 h | PCBs can seriously damage the bone and heart development of zebrafish, while the presence of NPs significantly enhanced the toxicity of PCBs in zebrafish | [66] |
| Zebrafish (Danio rerio) | PS | 15 nm | 50 mg/L- | 96 h | Down-regulation in cardiac, vascular, and immunogenic pathways | [67] |
| Zebrafish embryo | PS | 50 nm | 1 mg/L | 96 h |
Decrease HR Decrease Bmp4 gene expression Decrease Gata4 gene expression Cardiac deformities |
[68] |
| Zebrafish embryo | PS, PE | From 10 to 1000 | From 2000–200,000 MP L− 1 to 12.5–100 mg L− 1 | 96 h | Decrease HR | [69] |
| Zebrafish | PE | 0.5 μm |
1, 10 and 100 µg/ml |
96 hpf |
Structural heart alternation Impaired cardiac function |
[70] |
| Marine medaka, Oryzias melastigma | PS | 50 nm | 55 µg/L | 21 days | Decreased embryonic HR | [71] |
| Zebrafish (Danio rerio) | PS |
30 nm 50 nm 51 nm |
30 and 50 mg/L | 120 hpf | Decrease HR | [72] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 0.2, 1.0, and 10 μm | 20 µg/mL | - | Greater cardiotoxicity by small-size vs. large-size particles | [73] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 10 μm |
0.05, 0.1 mg/L 1, 5, 10 mg/L |
8, 24, 32, 48 and 96 hpe (HPF) | Increase HR in zebrafish embryo and larvae | [56] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 100 nm |
250 items of µ-PS or 2 × 104 item of n-PS suspended in 50 mL exposure solution |
72 hpf | Accelerated HR and blood flow velocity in the embryo | [44] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 3–12 μm | 10 mg/g dry food | 21 days |
Decline heart function DNA damage Induce oxidative stress |
[74] |
| Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) | PP | - | 100 and 500 µg/body weight | 30 days |
Increase cholesterol Increase heart mass |
[75] |
| Zebrafish |
PGA PBAT |
3 μm | from 0.24 to 12.72 mg plastic/L | 3 months |
Heartbeat suppression Pericardial edema |
[76] |
|
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo |
PS | 20–100 nm | 0 (control), 0.1, 1, and 10 ppm PS NPs | 114 h |
No change in pericardial area Decrease HR Accumulation in pericardium |
[77] |
|
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryo |
PS, PHE | 80 nm |
5 mg/L PS, 10 mg/L PS, 0.1 mg/L PHE, 0.2 mg/L PHE, 5 mg/L PS + 0.1 mg/L PHE, 5 mg/L PS + 0.2 mg/L PHE |
- |
Pericardial edema Increase HR |
[78] |
| Daphnia magna | PS | 154.1 ± 2.9 nm | 5 µg/L | Lifelong | Decrease HR | [79] |
| Goldfish Carassius auratus Larvae | PS | 70 nm and 5 μm | 10, 100 and 1000 µg/L | 1, 3, and 7 days |
Increase HR Elevated ROS level |
[46] |
| Zebrafish embryo | PS | 50 nm | 5.0 mg/L | 72 h | Pericardial edema | [80] |
| Zebrafish embryo | PET |
Particles (150 μm) Fibers (3–5 mm in length and 20 μm in diameter) |
0.5gr/100 ml | 72 h | Increase HR | [81] |
| Lates calcarifer | PS | 1 μm | 0.5 µg and 1 µg/ml | 48 h | Heart tissue damage | [82] |
| Tadpoles | PS | 10 μm | 125–1250 mg/L | 12 h | Accumulation in heart tissue | [83] |
| Zebrafish embryo | PS | 80 nm | 50 µg/L, 100 µg/L, 1 mg/L, 5 mg/L, 10 mg/L | 120 h |
No significant change in HR Pericardial edema Accumulation in heart tissue |
[84] |
|
Zebrafish embryo |
PET | 5 mm | 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 20 mg/L) | 144 h | Increase HR | [85] |
| Oryzias melastigma embryo | PVC | 53–106 μm | 1 × 106 particles/L | 25 days |
Pericardial edema Changing in the phenotype of the heart Up-regulation of the cardiac development genes (GATA4 and NKX2.5) Increase HR |
[86] |
| Zebrafish | PE | 200 nm |
Embryo (10 mg/L) Adult (2 mg/L) |
Embryo (120 hpf) Adult (7days) |
Accumulation in the heart of larvae but not adult | [87] |
| Daphnia magna | PE | 20 nm |
1 mg/L 50 mg/L |
- | Decrease HR | [88] |
| Mytilus galloprovincialis | PS | 14–20 μm | 10 mg/ml | 96 h | Increase HR | [89] |
| Zebrafish | PE, PE, PP, PS | 52–74 μm |
Embryo: 102, 103, 104, 106 particles/L Larvae: 102, 104 particles/L |
Acute toxicity test: 4 h to 5 days Chronic toxicity test: 10 days to 28 days |
Embryo: no impact on development at 102 particles/L; accelerated heartbeat and increased death at 104 and 106 particles/L for PE, and PS Larvae: No impact on feeding, growth, or oxidative stress; locomotion and AChE activity inhibited by MNPs at 104 particles/L |
[90] |
| Daphnia magna | PE | 32–38 μm | 0, 5, 40, and 160 mg/L | 1, 3, and 5 h | Decrease HR | [54] |
| Zebrafish | PS | 20 nm | 3nl | 4 h |
Increase HR in offspring Increase blood flow rate in offspring |
[91] |
| Medaka | PS | 10 μm | 20 and 200 µg/L | [92] | ||
| Medaka | PS | 0.05, 0.50 and 6.00 μm | 0.1, 1 × 103,and 1 × 106 particles/mL | 4 hpf |
Heart rates significantly increased from 3 to 4 days post-fertilization Heart rates decreased from 8 to 9 days of post-fertilization underexposure Dose dependent effect: 0.1 particles/mL: Initial increase followed by a decrease in heart rates 1 × 10^3 particles/mL: Consistently stronger heart rates from 3 to 9 days of post fertilization 1 × 10^6 particles/mL: Significant decrease in heart rates |
[93] |
Bradycardia and depressed cardiac output
Exposure to PS-NPs has been shown to induce bradycardia, suggesting interference with cardiac pacemaking and autonomic regulation. Several mechanisms contribute to this effect:
-
Neurotoxicity:
Decreased spontaneous contraction frequency and impaired neural regulation of cardiac tissue have been reported, indicating that PS-NPs may interfere with cholinergic or adrenergic signaling pathways [52].
-
Oxidative Stress:
Elevated levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and decreased antioxidant enzyme activity (e.g., SOD, GPx) suggest that redox imbalance impairs mitochondrial function, leading to slower cardiac activity and reduced perfusion [60].
-
Histological Damage:
PS-NPs have been shown to cause histological damage in various tissues, including gills, liver, and gonads. Notably, damage to the gills could affect oxygen uptake, which may, in turn, impact heart rate. Structural changes in these organs can disrupt overall physiological balance, including cardiac function [60].
-
Endocrine Disruption:
The study also indicates that PS-NPs disrupt the reproductive endocrine system in a sex-dependent manner. While the primary focus was on reproductive effects, endocrine disruptions can have broader physiological impacts, including on heart rate. Alterations in hormonal balance can influence cardiovascular function, as sex hormones are involved in regulating heart rate and other processes [60].
Tachycardia and other alterations induced by MPs
The research reveals that exposure to MPs leads to notable alterations in heart rate among zebrafish larvae. At higher concentrations, MPs can accelerate the heart rate, deviating from normal developmental patterns. This change, coupled with pericardial edema (fluid accumulation around the heart), suggests that MPs may induce physiological stress, possibly due to inflammatory responses or direct interference with cardiac tissue [59, 61]. The mechanisms behind this tachycardia include:
-
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress:
Increased ROS levels and mitochondrial quantity in larvae exposed to MPs indicate heightened oxidative stress. This stress can disrupt cellular and tissue functions, including those of the heart, potentially leading to abnormal heart rate patterns [59, 61].
-
Signal transduction pathways:
MPs affect lipid metabolism and calcium ion signaling pathways, which are crucial for normal cardiac function. Disruptions in these pathways can alter how signals are transmitted and processed within the heart, impacting heart rate [59].
-
Antioxidant response:
In response to PS-MP exposure, the antioxidant system adapts, showing increased activity of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme. This may serve as a compensatory mechanism to counteract oxidative stress. However, the balance between ROS and antioxidant activity, including enzymes like SOD and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), can vary with concentration and particle size, influencing overall heart rate effects [61].
Micromitophagy and apoptosis:
High concentrations of MPs trigger micromitophagy and apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells via the Kras/MAPK signaling pathway. Although the primary focus was on the intestines, these cellular processes could have systemic effects, including on cardiac function [59, 61].
Overall, the data suggest that both PS-NPs and MPs can significantly disrupt normal cardiac function in aquatic organisms, with various mechanisms contributing to observed changes in heart rate. As depicted in Fig. 2, ROS-mediated oxidative stress and NF-κB-driven inflammation are central mechanisms in MNP-induced cardiovascular damage.
Fig. 2.
Mechanistic pathways of MNP-Induced cardiotoxicity
Impact of MPs on aquatic animals and terrestrial animals’ edema
Now, let’s discuss the potential efficacy of MNPs in inducing pericardial edema. The pericardium is an important structure surrounding the heart. Its primary function is to secrete serous fluid, which facilitates cardiac function. Pathological conditions can cause excessive fluid to flow into the pericardial cavity, resulting in pericardial edema. More fluid in the pericardial region can exert pressure on the heart and impact its function. Some of the pathological disorders that can induce pericardial edema include bacterial, fungal, and viral infections; other causes include chest trauma, inflammatory diseases, and heart failure. However, environmental factors are one of the most prominent causes of pericardial edema, particularly in animal species [94, 95]. MNPs, a global concern today, present significant environmental and health risks due to their ability to infiltrate the body, penetrate tissue barriers, and move through the bloodstream to reach other organs. They can put more stress on cells and cause inflammatory responses, damaging vascular endothelial cells and letting fluid leak into the tissues and pericardial cavity. Leakage and fluid accumulation around the heart cause pericardial edema [76].
Zebrafish embryos are one species used to study the influence of MNPs. Studies suggested that MNPs accumulate in the yolk sac within 24 hpf and move to the heart across development, causing pericardial edema and a decrease in heart rate [96].
A study conducted by SUN et al. indicated that exposing embryo zebrafish to different concentrations of polyethylene NPs at specific concentrations of 100 and 200 µg/ml caused pericardial edema and yolk sac degeneration. Despite the presence of pericardial edema and yolk sac disintegration, there was no change in heart rate, which can be explained by the fact that different factors might influence heart rate. Based on this experiment, no detrimental consequences were observed at a concentration of 50 µg/mL [96]. Another study by Zhang et al. also demonstrated that pericardial edema was observed in zebrafish larvae exposed to 100 µg/ml, 1, and 10 mg/l of polyacrylonitrile microfibers [59]. Both studies indicate a trend that depends on the dose.
It’s important to know that MNPs can absorb harmful environmental chemicals and release them into biological systems. The chorionic membrane in zebrafish serves as a protective barrier against contaminants, hence influencing the level of toxicity experienced by the embryo. There are pores in them that exchange oxygen and nutrients. If MNPs can’t pass through these pores, they stick to the cell membrane and it should be noted that the buildup of chemicals in an organism impacts its level of toxicity [97, 98].
Since the heart is the first organ to develop and function in fish, its development is particularly susceptible to chemical pollutants, resulting in pericardial edema [99]. Based on the Wang et al. study, exposure to various doses of polystyrene could cause pericardial edema, which is an important indicator of cardiotoxicity in this animal species. This study stated that doses lower than 50 µg/L failed to cause adverse cardiac effects directly [84]. Researchers conducted another study to investigate the impacts of phenanthrene and polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish embryos. The findings revealed that while both of these pollutants were capable of inducing cardiac edema, polystyrene had a more significant impact on the occurrence of this disorder [100].
In this regard, other studies showed that microplastics (PS), PMP (primary MP), and SMP (secondary MP) derived from PVC could enter the yolk sac and damage the zebrafish embryo’s heart, leading to pericardial edema [55, 101].
Our systematic review provided further depth to our understanding of the relationships between the impact of MNPs on pericardial edema.
Impact of MPs on aquatic animals and terrestrial animals’ fibrosis
MPs pollution is an emerging environmental problem that not only causes environmental pollution but also makes a vast threat to living organisms. Because of their high distribution and complicated effects on living organisms. A summary of the collected studies is given in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Table 2.
Impact of MPs on the cardiovascular of terrestrial animals
| Species | Type | Size | Dose | Duration | Impact | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | PET | 5–10 μm | 0.5, 5, and 50 µg/mL | 90 days | Cardiomyocyte destruction and fibrosis | [102] |
| Pig(Pietrain x Duroc) | PET | Average size 153.09 μm |
0.1 g/pig/day 1 g/pig/day |
4 weeks | Increase the prevalence of heart diseases | [103] |
| Mouse | PE | 10–45 μm | 0, 6, and 60 µg | Gestational day 9 to postnatal day (PND) 7 | Increase cardiac mass | [104] |
| Mice | PS | 100 nm | 10–100 µg/mL | 30 and 180 days | Increase vascular accident incidence | [105] |
| Rats | PS | 0.5 mm | 0.5, 5 and 50 mg/L | 90 days | Elevated cTnI level | [106] |
| Mice | PS | (0.5 μm and 5 μm) | (0.1 µg/ml and 1 µg/ml) | 12 weeks | Increase cardiovascular events incidence | [107] |
| Mice | PS | 0.5 μm MP1 and 5 μm MP2 | 5 g/L | 8 weeks |
Induced inflammation Structural heart damage |
[108] |
| Mice | PS | 0.7918 ± 0.00273 μm | 30 mg/kg | 35 days | Accumulation of MNPs in heart | [109] |
| Mice | PS | 300 nm | 1 mg/kg | 35 days | Structural heart alternation | [110] |
| Chicken | PS | 5 μm |
1 mg/L 10 mg/L 100 mg/L |
42 days |
Induced inflammation ATP production pathway disruption |
[111] |
| Mice | PS | - | 5 µg/g | 2 weeks |
Induced oxidative stress TGF-β1/Smad pathway activation Collagen accumulation |
[112] |
| Chick | PS | 5 μm | 10 mg/L and 100 mg/L | 42 days |
Down-regulation of TnnT2, Nkx2-5, Gata4, TBX5 and ACTN2 Up-regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress markers GRP78, PERK, eIF2α, IRE1, ATF4, ATF6 and CHOP |
[113] |
| ApoE(-/-) Mice | PS | 50 nm | 2.5–250 mg kg(−1) | 19 weeks |
Increase total cholesterol in foam cells Up-regulation of MARCO gene/protein expression Exacerbated the artery stiffness and promoted the formation of atherosclerotic plaque |
[114] |
| Wistar Rat | PS | 0.5 mm | 0.5, 5, and 50 mg/L | 90 days |
Elevated Creatine kinase-MB and cardiac troponinI Increase MDA Increase SOD, GPx, and CAT Up-regulation of interleukin (IL)−1β, IL-18 Up-regulation of Nfkb Activation of NLRP3 Activation of NLRP3 Inhibition of Caspase-1-dependent signaling pathway Morphological changes in cardiac tissue |
[47] |
| Male Wistar Rats | PET | 160 μm | 1.4, 35, or 125 mg/kg | 24 h | Elevated TG level | [115] |
| Mice | PS | - | 10%, 1%, and 0.1% by weight of the feed | 42 days | Decrease heart mass index | [116] |
| Mice | PET | 5–10 μm | 5–50 µg/mL | 90 days |
Capillary congestion Myocardial fiber breakage and fibrosis |
[117] |
| C57BL/6 Mice | PS | 10 μm | 1000 µg/L | 6 months |
Intramyocardial lipid deposition Disruption of myocardial arrangement Nuclear swelling Enhanced dissolution Inflammatory damage Severe cardiac fibrosis Elevated CK-MB and LDH Elevated AST level (marker of myocardial infarction and myocarditis) Elevated cTnI level Elevated TC, TG, and LDL-C levels Decrease HDL-C level Increase chronic cardiotoxicity |
[118] |
| C57BL/6 Mice | PET | 5 μm | 1000 µg/L | 180 days |
Induced oxidative stress and hyperlipidemia Aggravated vascular lesions Cardiac tissue structure damage Lipid and collagen deposition in heart Elevated AST and CK levels Differentially expressed genes in the mouse aorta |
[119] |
| Pregnant Rats | PS | 20 nm | 8.8 × 1014 particles/mL; 10 mg/mL | 24 h |
Increase in gross maternal heart weight Increase aortic vascular smooth muscle responsivity Impaired endothelial function Increase aorta mean velocity Increase LVOT mean velocity Increase LVOT mean pressure gradient Increase LVOT stroke distance |
[120] |
| Mice | PS | 1–100 nm |
3 mg/kg 6 mg/kg 10 mg/kg |
8 weeks |
Significant cardiac aging Induced oxidative stress Significant inflammatory damage |
[121] |
| Frog | PE | - | 60 mg/L | 168 h |
No significant differences in heart rates No cardiotoxicity |
[122] |
| Chicken | PS | 25 nm |
5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml, 0.01 mg/ml. |
24 h, 4 days, and 8 days |
Congenital heart defects Impaired cardiac function |
[123] |
| Mice | PS | 10 μm | Mice were exposed to MPs in drinking water at a concentration of 1000 g/L | 180 days | Induced myocyte apoptosis | [124] |
| Mice | PS | 40 nm | 0 µg/day, 16 µg/day, 40 µg/day, and 100 µg/day. | 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks |
Dose-dependent and time-dependent cardiac injury Oxidative stress and inflammation Heart structural damage |
[125] |
| Mice | PS | 1 μm |
25 µg 50 µg |
4 weeks | Structural heart alternation | [126] |
Table 3.
Impact of MPs on the cardiovascular of human cells
| Cell model | Type | Size | Dose | Duration | Impact | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) | PS | - | - | 60 min |
Decrease intracellular Ca Impaired electrophysiological activity Impaired myocardial contractility |
[127] |
| Chicken embryo cardiomyocytes | PS | 5 μm | 0.5 mg/mL | 24 h | Down-regulation of LC3, ATG5, Beclin1 and P62 and P53 (autophagy-related genes) | [113] |
| Porcine coronary artery endothelial cell | PS | 20 nm |
0.1, 1, and 10 µg/mL |
24 h |
Endothelial dysfunction Oxidative stress Up-regulation of NADPH oxidases gene Elevated P53, P21, P22, P16, and NOX protein levels |
[128] |
| Human ESC lines H1 | PS | - | 5 µg/mL, 20 µg/mL | 24 h and 48 h |
Induced cell injury and apoptosis in hESCs (dose- and time-dependent) Mitochondrial damage Elevated Cyt-c, Bax and Caspase-3 levels Decrease Bcl-2 level Induced apoptosis |
[129] |
| H9C2 cells | PET | 5–10 μm | 5–50 µg/mL | 90 days |
Induced oxidative stress Cardiomyocyte apoptosis Myocardial fibrosis |
[117] |
| H9c2 and AC16 | PS | 1–100 nm |
0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg/mL |
60 min | Induced cardiomyocyte senescence | [121] |
| Human pluripotent stem cell-derived three-dimensional cardiac organoid (CO) model | PS | 1 μm | 0.025 µg/mL, 0.25 µg/mL, and 2.5 µg/mL | 72 h |
Induced oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis Collagen accumulation Cardiac dysfunction and hypertrophy |
[126] |
Although, current studies mostly focus on the biogenic risks of MPs to aquatic organisms, there is an urgent need to provide a review of studies related to health risks to terrestrials such as mammals.
MPs are potential threat to both terrestrial and marine ecosystems by directly affecting the organs and activating a plethora of intracellular signaling, that may lead to cell death. There is accumulating evidence that supports the serious toxicity caused by MPs at all levels of biological complexities (biomolecules, organelles, cells, tissues, organs, and organ systems) and the involvement of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in this process [130, 131]. Intracellular ROS production by MPs have been shown by multiple groups using various model systems [130, 131].
Formation of ROS is the molecular initiating event, leading to oxidative stress and inflammation [131].
MPs in the environment can be ingested by organisms through the food chain, and can cause many toxic effects on different organs of the body including cardiovascular system [132]. Cardiotoxicity is one the main toxic effects of MPs in the body [133].
MPs could accumulate in cardiomyocytes of rats and induce cardiac tissue damage and apoptosis of myocardial cells. there are relatively few studies on the cardiotoxicity caused by MPs, which can be used as directions in future research [47].
In mammals, reported studies showed impaired heart contractility, neonatal cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and activation of fibrotic processes [134].
As a consequence of oxidative stress caused by the MPs, different types of organ damage are observed in living species, such as cardiotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, etc.
A study published by Wang et al. also demonstrated the role of MP-induced mitochondrial depolarization in the enhancement of cellular oxidative stress in Caco-2 cells. Another study by Florance et al. revealed that MPs promote lipid accumulation in macrophages, which eventually leads to a decrease in MMP and increased oxidative stress [135, 136].
mitochondria serve as a major target for the MPs to induce oxidative stress in cells and tissues, by modulating a wide array of downstream signaling cascades [130].
The MPs also measurably induced pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α.
Lu et al. investigate the toxic effects of PET MPs on ICR mice and H9C2 cells by different treatment groups. The results indicated the cardiac tissue of mice in the PET-H (50 µg/mL) group showed significant capillary congestion, myocardial fiber breakage, and even significant fibrosis compared to the PET-C (control) group (P < 0.01). Results of the TUNEL assay demonstrated significant apoptosis in myocardial tissue in the PET-H and PET-M (5 µg/mL) groups (P < 0.01) [117].
Another study published by Zhang et al. invested the induction of myocardial inflammation and cell death via the TLR4/NF-κB pathway in carp. In this study they showed that PS-MPs exposure could induce inflammation, apoptosis, and necrosis in carp myocardial tissue and cardiomyocytes [63].
Zhang et al. in 2022, also published a study which showed PS-MPs exposure triggered oxidative stress and ROS overload in myocardium. Detailed mechanistic investigation indicated that PS-MPs triggered pyroptosis via NF-κB-NLRP3-GSDMD axis and exacerbated myocardial inflammation (NLRP3, Caspase-1, IL-1β, IL-18, ASC, GSDMD, NF-κB, COX-2, iNOS and IL-6 overexpression). Additionally, PS-MPs induced mitochondrial damage (TFAM, OPA1, MFN1 and MFN2 down-expression, DRP1 and Fis1 overexpression) and energy metabolism disorders (HK2, PKM2, PDHX and LDH up-regulation) by inhibiting AMPK-PGC-1α pathway [111].
Zhou et al. in 2023 showed that Low-dose of polystyrene MPs induce cardiotoxicity in mice and human-originated cardiac organoids [126].
Yang et al. in 2020 showed that MPs at higher concentrations can cause damage to fish larvae and MPs are potentially more hazardous [46].
A study investigated in October 2020, indicated that Polystyrene MNPs cause cardiac fibrosis by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats. The results showed that polystyrene MNPs could cause cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction, induce oxidative stress and apoptosis [106].
Hemodynamic dysregulation and pro-thrombotic effects of MNPs
Beyond direct cardiomyocyte toxicity, emerging evidence suggests that micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) profoundly affect systemic cardiovascular physiology. Critical pathways include dysregulation of blood pressure, endothelial barrier impairment, vascular smooth muscle dysfunction, and thrombogenesis. These effects are increasingly recognized as central to the cardiovascular burden of MNPs, expanding the focus from myocardial injury to whole-organism vascular health.
Vascular tone and blood pressure alterations
The vascular system appears to be a primary and highly sensitive target of MNP exposure. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that MNPs interfere with vascular tone regulation through multiple converging mechanisms:
Nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability
Several endothelial cell models have shown that exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs) suppresses endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity and reduces NO production, a key mediator of vasodilation and vascular homeostasis. Reduced NO levels impair endothelium-dependent relaxation, favoring vasoconstriction and elevated blood pressure.
Oxidative stress and endothelial senescence
MNP exposure increases intracellular ROS generation and NADPH oxidase activation, which not only promotes vascular oxidative stress but also accelerates endothelial senescence. Senescent endothelial cells lose their ability to regulate vascular tone, further contributing to arterial stiffness and impaired vasodilation.
Microvascular leakage and barrier dysfunction
Evidence from zebrafish and rodent models indicates that MNPs compromise endothelial barrier integrity, causing microvascular leakage and impaired microcirculatory perfusion. These alterations may lead to tissue hypoxia and hemodynamic instability.
Hemodynamic load and vascular smooth muscle reactivity
In rodent models, exposure to PS-NPs has been linked to increased aortic mean velocity, elevated left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) pressure gradients, and enhanced stroke distance. These changes suggest that MNPs alter vascular smooth muscle contractility and systemic resistance, imposing a higher hemodynamic load on the heart.
Taken together, these findings indicate that endothelial dysfunction and vascular dysregulation are not secondary phenomena but rather pivotal mechanisms of MNP-induced cardiovascular toxicity. Persistent vascular injury may contribute to hypertension, microvascular ischemia, and increased susceptibility to long-term cardiovascular disease [137].
Endothelial dysfunction via redox imbalance
In vitro analysis of porcine coronary endothelial cells showed that exposure to PS-NPs induces endothelial senescence and eNOS downregulation, accompanied by increased ROS production and enhanced NADPH oxidase expression [138]. These changes impair nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, crucial for vasodilation and blood pressure regulation [128]. Importantly, antioxidant treatment with N‑acetylcysteine (NAC) or apocynin reversed both oxidative and senescence markers, highlighting a redox-sensitive mechanism.
Thrombogenesis and platelet activation
Polystyrene nanoplastics have been shown to enhance platelet aggregation in vitro and in vivo, with severity depending on particle size and surface chemistry [139]. For instance, amine-modified PS‑NPs (50 nm) strongly activate platelets via αIIbβ3 integrin-mediated mechanisms, both through direct membrane interaction and bridging adjacent platelets [140].
Moreover, PS-NPs can adsorb coagulation proteins such as factor XII and plasminogen activator inhibitor‑1, promoting thrombus formation in vivo.
A hamster model further confirmed that positively charged PS‑NPs cross the pulmonary capillary barrier and significantly increase thrombosis at blood concentrations of ≥ 50 µg/kg, while neutral or negatively charged particles had minimal effects.
These findings collectively suggest that MNPs may contribute to hypertension, endothelial activation, and thrombotic events, expanding the implications of plastic exposure from cellular to whole-organism cardiovascular dysfunction [128].
MPs impact on cardiovascular in human cells
Herein, we will talk about how MNPs affect different cells, such as H9C2, AC16, H1 derived from ESC, Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes, Chicken embryos cardiomyocytes, porcine endothelial cells, and RAW264.7 [113, 114, 117, 121, 127–129].
First of all, when it comes to the impact of MNPs on cells, the main question that crosses the mind is how MNPs internalize and entire the cells. Studies reported that NPs were able to transfer into different cells according to dose and time-dependent manner, however, the precise mechanism is also uncertain [121, 129]. As a result, they have a tremendous impact on cell function and shape by altering gene expression, enhancing oxidative stress and inflammation, mitochondrial disruption, and subsequent apoptosis. Furthermore, high serum concentration in culture media was considered an effective way to avoid particle penetration [128].
In terms of oxidative stress and inflammation, numerous studies have figured out that MNPs can induce oxidative stress contributing to senescence. MNPs can accomplish this in a variety of ways, Firstly, Substantial decrease in antioxidant enzymes, like SOD, catalase, and GSH. Secondly, promoting peroxidation and ROS production. To prove this, lots of evaluations were done that revealed a significant increase in TNFα, IL-1β, IL6, IL8, NF-κB, Hmox1, Ngo1, and Nrf2 levels [117, 121, 126, 129]. whereas, observations showed that pretreatment with N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) resulted in a relative decrease in oxidative stress after MNP exposure [117].
It has been believed that aging is an unstoppable process that occurs in cells second by second. Cardiac aging is the most common cause of death among elderly people. MNPs can make room to facilitate this process. Studies have demonstrated an upregulation in p53, p16, and p21 expression indicating the aging process acceleration. Further evaluation also revealed the propagation of Sa-β-gal expression, a prominent senescence marker. Taken together, these findings suggest that cells exposed to MNPs experience cell cycle arrest [121, 128]. Moreover, utilizing neferine, NF-κB inhibitor, alleviated MNPs-induced senescence [121].
It is interesting to note that mitochondria play a substantial role in cardiac cells due to their high demand for ATP. MNPs disrupt mitochondrial function through the following descriptions: Excessive calcium influx into mitochondria, decline in oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and ATP production, and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, following these events, cytochrome-C (Cyt-c) is released into the cytoplasm, Bax expression is promoted and Bcl-2 and Caspase3 are decreased, All these together cause activation of the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway [117, 121, 126, 127, 129].
Another debatable issue is how MNPs affect calcium metabolism in cells [126]. It was already said that the influx of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum into the cytoplasm can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and ultimately cell death. Treating cells with the inositol 1, 4, and 5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) inhibitor (2-APB) was able to attenuate mitochondrial damage and augment cell viability [121]. In addition, MNPs can interfere with intracellular calcium homeostasis and consequently impair the contractility of cardiomyocytes [127, 129].
Interestingly, PS-MPs significantly correlate with concentration, inducing myocardial dysplasia. The myocardial dysplasia in chicken embryo cardiomyocytes was observed through 3 pathways. The first pathway involved the downregulation of TnnT2, Nkx2-5, Gata4, TBX5, and ACTN2. Another is to increase endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers such as GRP78, PERK, eIF2α, IRE1, ATF4, ATF6, and CHOP expression, and the last is Deactivation of autophagy-induced genes LC3, ATG5, Beclin1 and P62. Furthermore, the addition of 4 PB illustrated the reversibility of all the above mechanisms [6].
While pathways such as NLRP3 inflammasome activation, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and cGAS-STING activation have been proposed, few studies have utilized genetically modified or knock-out models to confirm causality. Future investigations employing transgenic animals or CRISPR-mediated knockdowns are critical to validate these mechanisms and identify therapeutic targets.
Factors affecting the accumulation of MPs in the circulatory system
MNPs particles of different sizes can enter the body in different ways. Smaller particles are easily absorbed through the respiratory and digestive systems and can enter the bloodstream. These particles can then be transported to various organs, including the heart. Studies have shown that MNPs particles with sizes less than 10 micrometers can easily pass through biological barriers and penetrate into heart tissues.
The entry of MNPs into the heart can have negative effects on cardiovascular health. These particles may cause inflammation and damage to heart cells and affect heart function. Also, MNPs can act as carriers of harmful chemicals and transfer these substances to heart tissues.
In general, the size of MNPs plays an important role in their ability to penetrate biological systems and cause negative health effects.
Studies show that the size and dose of MNPs can affect the severity of cardiovascular diseases. For example, in one study, MNPs were detected in more than 50% of fatty deposits in arteries, and a correlation between the level of MNPs and the severity of cardiovascular diseases was observed¹². Also, the presence of MNPs in plaques blocking blood vessels in the neck increases the risk of heart attack and stroke.
When injected at the blastula stage, polystyrene nanoparticles (PS-NPs) accumulated around the heart region and within the bloodstream at three days post-injection (dpi) [44, 77]. In contrast, no PS-NPs were observed in the ducts of Cuvier when injected at a later developmental stage. This indicates that the bioaccumulation and distribution of MNPs in the circulatory system are dependent on the particle sizes of MNPs [77].
For instance, when zebrafish embryos and larvae were separately exposed to PS-NPs (100 nm) and polystyrene microparticles (PS-MPs) (157 ± 52 μm), only the PS-NPs migrated through the bloodstream and reached the heart at 48–120 h post-fertilization (hpf) [141]. Similarly, PS-NPs (34.5 ± 10.8 nm) were first detected accumulating in the yolk sac as early as 24 hpf, and then in the pericardium by 48 hpf.
A recent study on Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) living in a realistic environment reported an accumulation of MPs in internal organs such as the gills, heart, kidneys, and digestive system. Some MPs were retained in the circulation due to mechanical blockage in the capillaries [141]. MPs detected in the heart and its luminal blood were significantly smaller than those in other organs. The average diameter of suspected MPs in the cut organs in the gills was about 11 μm, in the heart 6.8 μm, and the digestive system 26 μm. Interestingly, MPs in the heart were of the same size range as hematocytes, corroborating the role of the circulatory system in the distribution of MNPs [141].
Besides fish, the movement of MNP to the heart via the circulatory system has also been observed in rodents [142]. For example, oral exposure of Wistar rats to PS-NPs (0.5 μm) for 90 days led to the presence of NPs in the myocardial cells at doses of 5 and 50 mg/L [142]. Similarly, after a 30 mg/kg body weight (BW) PS-NP treatment (0.79 μm) for 35 days, orally exposed mice exhibited prominent PS-NP accumulation in the blood, followed by blood-rich organs such as the spleen, lungs, kidneys, liver, small intestine, and heart. Similar findings have also been reported in C57BL/6 J mice, where PS-MNPs accumulated in the spleen, kidneys, heart, liver, lungs, and blood in a size-dependent manner after oral exposure to PS-MNPs (50–5,000 nm; 125–500 mg/kg BW) for 24 h [143].
The wide biodistribution of MNPs in various organs could be due to epithelial cell apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated intestinal barrier dysfunction caused by MNPs, which promoted MNP absorption and biodistribution. The passage of MNPs from the environment to the heart is influenced not only by particle size but also by surface modification. In a rodent study, amine-PS-NPs (60 nm) crossed the pulmonary blood barrier and caused thrombosis and pulmonary inflammation in hamsters. Additionally, when Fischer 344 rats were orally exposed to three differently charged (neutrally, positively, and negatively) PS-NPs (50 nm) for six hours, higher bioaccumulation of negatively charged PS-NPs was observed in the heart compared to those with neutral or positive charges [35, 144].
Overall, MNPs can penetrate the intestinal epithelium or pulmonary blood barrier, enter the bloodstream through the portal vein, redistribute in the blood, and then accumulate around the heart. MNPs larger than 0.5 mm are less likely to pass through the intestinal epithelium, and MNPs larger than 400 nm cannot penetrate the pulmonary blood barrier. When larger than 150 μm–10 μm in diameter, MPs cannot be absorbed into the blood or penetrate blood vessels, respectively. Subsequently, MNPs are distributed in internal organs with blood flow in a size-dependent manner, where smaller particles exhibit greater biodistribution [144].
Looking at Fig. 3, we can see that Severe Toxicity is most pronounced in the smallest size range (1–50 nm), with a count close to 12. Moderate Toxicity is Distributed across all sizes, peaking in the 100–500 nm range. Low Toxicity is Present across various sizes, highest in the > 10 μm category. This graph suggests that smaller MNPs are more likely to cause severe cardiotoxic effects.
Fig. 3.
Size-dependent graph of cardiotoxic effects of MNPs based on Tables 1 and 2
Emerging human evidence of MNP-associated cardiovascular risk
Although most of the existing data on MNP-induced cardiotoxicity is derived from in vivo and in vitro experimental models, recent human studies have begun to reveal compelling links between MNP presence and cardiovascular disease outcomes.
A pivotal study reported the presence of microplastic particles in more than 50% of carotid atherosclerotic plaques excised from patients undergoing endarterectomy. Notably, patients with detectable plastic particles in plaques had higher rates of past myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular events, suggesting that MNPs may contribute to plaque instability and thrombotic risk [145].
Similarly, demonstrated elevated levels of circulating polystyrene nanoplastics in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to healthy controls. These findings correlated with elevated biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (e.g., ICAM-1, VCAM-1) and pro-thrombotic cytokines [146].
Furthermore, a cross-sectional environmental cohort study in urban China identified a positive association between airborne MNP exposure and blood pressure elevation, raising the possibility that inhaled particles may influence vascular tone and autonomic regulation.
These early findings suggest that MNPs are not just laboratory hazards but plausible contributors to human cardiovascular morbidity. Although causality has yet to be definitively established, the translational relevance of experimental models is strongly supported by these real-world observations.
Potential interventions and therapeutic strategies
Given the central role of oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulation disturbances in MNP-induced cardiotoxicity, several therapeutic strategies have emerged based on experimental evidence:
Antioxidant therapy (NAC, Resveratrol, Apocynin, CoQ10)
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is shown to significantly attenuate ROS production and restore NO bioavailability and eNOS activity in endothelial models and in vivo assays—indicating its potential to counteract MNP-induced redox imbalance [147].
Resveratrol, a polyphenolic antioxidant, demonstrated reduced expression of inflammatory markers (IL-8, VCAM-1, ICAM-1) and improved endothelial function in human clinical studies, supporting its potential for in vivo cardioprotection [148].
Apocynin, a NADPH oxidase (NOX) inhibitor, effectively reduced ROS and increased NO levels in endothelial (HUVEC) and hypertensive rat models, improving vascular reactivity [149].
Notably, NAC and apocynin represent promising agents to mitigate MNP-driven endothelial injury.
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), though not yet directly tested against MNPs, has robust cardioprotective effects (via antioxidant and mitochondrial support) in heart disease, and could be explored in MNP contexts [150, 151].
ER stress modulation and autophagy restoration
In models of embryonic cardiomyocyte exposure to PS-MPs, treatment with 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA) successfully reversed ER stress marker upregulation and restored autophagy balance, leading to improved cell morphology and gene expression. This highlights ER stress inhibition as a potential therapeutic pathway.
Endothelial coagulation inhibitors
As discussed in Sect. 3.8, amine-modified PS-NPs trigger platelet activation via integrin αIIbβ3. This suggests that anti-platelet agents (e.g., integrin inhibitors) or heparin-like substances may prevent thrombogenesis when co-administered with plastically exposed subjects.
Targeted nanocarrier treatment
Innovative nanoparticles conjugated to GP Ibα, mimicking platelet targeting, have demonstrated selective uptake by activated endothelial cells, opening avenues for targeted delivery of antioxidants or anti-inflammatory drugs to diseased vascular sites [152].
Beyond mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic strategies, the implications of MNP-induced cardiovascular toxicity extend to public health and regulatory domains. The detection of MNPs in human cardiovascular tissues underscores the urgent need for standardized monitoring and risk assessment frameworks. From a regulatory perspective, development of exposure guidelines and incorporation of MNPs into environmental health policies will be essential. Clinically, the identification of early biomarkers (e.g., endothelial dysfunction, elevated cardiac enzymes) may support preventive screening and risk stratification in exposed populations. These aspects highlight that the cardiovascular burden of MNPs is not only an experimental concern but also a matter of public health importance.
Conclusions
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have increasingly emerged as systemic toxicants capable of inducing a broad spectrum of cardiovascular disturbances. As detailed in this review, MNPs can translocate across biological barriers and accumulate in cardiac tissues, where they initiate molecular cascades involving oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, cellular senescence, and apoptosis. These events ultimately contribute to structural and functional cardiac damage, including bradycardia, fibrosis, and vascular injury.
Experimental studies in aquatic and terrestrial animals, as well as human cell models, consistently demonstrate that smaller particles and higher exposure doses correlate with more severe cardiotoxic effects. Recent clinical findings further support the translational relevance of these models, with MNPs now being detected in human atherosclerotic plaques and associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Additionally, the ability of MNPs to adsorb and transport other environmental toxicants raises concern for synergistic toxicity, a factor that may amplify their impact on human health.
Despite these advances, critical gaps remain in understanding the full extent of cardiovascular risks posed by MNPs. There is an urgent need for studies simulating chronic, low-dose exposure at environmentally relevant levels, as well as further investigations into how particle characteristics, aging, and co-exposures influence biological outcomes. Standardized methodologies and sensitive biomarkers for cardiovascular toxicity will be essential to generate comparable data and enable risk assessment.
Considering the global burden of cardiovascular disease, the growing evidence linking MNP exposure to cardiac dysfunction calls for proactive scientific and regulatory responses. Future interdisciplinary research efforts must bridge experimental data with population-level findings, facilitating the development of preventive strategies and therapeutic interventions aimed at mitigating the cardiovascular consequences of MNP exposure.
In addition to experimental evidence, the translational relevance of MNP cardiotoxicity calls for proactive public health measures and regulatory oversight. Standardized exposure monitoring, integration into cardiovascular risk assessments, and early diagnostic strategies are critical steps toward mitigating the potential clinical impact of MNP exposure.
Limitations
This systematic review has several limitations that must be acknowledged:
Lack of Human Clinical Data: Despite growing concern about MNP exposure, direct evidence from human clinical studies remains extremely limited. Most available data are derived from in vitro or animal models, which may not fully replicate human physiological responses.
Heterogeneity of Study Designs: Included studies varied widely in terms of exposure duration, particle type, concentration, and organism model, which made quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis unfeasible.
Non-Standardized Testing Protocols: The absence of standardized protocols for assessing cardiovascular toxicity of MNPs limits the comparability and reproducibility of findings across studies.
Focus on Acute Effects: Most studies examined short-term or high-dose exposures, providing limited insight into the chronic, low-dose exposure scenarios that are more relevant to human environmental exposure.
Potential Publication Bias: Studies with positive or significant findings may be overrepresented in the literature, while negative or null results may remain unpublished.
Limited Scope of Pollutants: This review focused exclusively on microplastics and nanoplastics. However, real-world exposures often involve complex mixtures with co-contaminants, whose combined effects remain underexplored.
This review did not apply a formal risk-of-bias tool due to methodological heterogeneity among included studies. Nevertheless, many reports exhibited small sample sizes, incomplete particle characterization, and variable exposure protocols, which may affect reproducibility. Future systematic reviews could benefit from structured appraisal frameworks such as SYRCLE for animal studies.
This review was limited to English-language publications, reflecting a predefined inclusion criterion based on the linguistic capacity of the research team. While this ensured consistency and reliability in data extraction, it may have introduced language bias by excluding potentially relevant studies published in other languages. Moreover, no formal publication bias assessment was performed, and therefore studies with null or negative results may be underrepresented.
Future directions
To advance our understanding of MNP-induced cardiovascular toxicity and improve health risk assessment frameworks, we recommend the following:
Standardization of Methodologies: Development of internationally accepted protocols for evaluating MNP toxicity—especially for cardiovascular outcomes—is urgently needed.
Long-term and Low-dose Exposure Studies: Future research should focus on chronic exposure at environmentally relevant doses to better mimic real-life human exposure conditions.
Mechanistic Insights in Human Models: Utilization of human-derived cardiac organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and organ-on-a-chip platforms can bridge the gap between animal studies and human relevance.
Inhalation and Airborne Exposure Studies: Given the rising concern over airborne MNPs, more in vivo studies focusing on inhalation routes and their cardiovascular effects are warranted.
Multi-pollutant Interactions: Investigations should explore the synergistic or antagonistic effects of MNPs with other environmental pollutants such as heavy metals, PAHs, and endocrine disruptors.
Biomarker Identification: Identification of early biomarkers (e.g., altered heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac enzymes) associated with MNP-induced cardiovascular stress may support early diagnosis and monitoring strategies.
Epidemiological Studies: Large-scale human cohort studies are essential to establish a causal link between MNP exposure and cardiovascular morbidity or mortality.
Acknowledgements
The authors received no funding for this work. However, they are grateful for the technical support Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences provided. The authors also appreciate the support from the Student Research Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.
Abbreviations
- MNPs
Micro- and Nanoplastics
- MPs
Microplastics
- NPs
Nanoplastics
- PS-NPs
Polystyrene Nanoparticles
- ROS
Reactive Oxygen Species
- eNOS
Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase
- NO
Nitric Oxide
- NAC
N-Acetylcysteine
- LVOT
Left Ventricular Outflow Tract
- NLRP3
NOD-, LRR- and Pyrin Domain-containing Protein 3 (inflammasome)
- NF-κB
Nuclear Factor Kappa B
- Wnt/β-catenin
Wingless/Integrated Pathway with β-catenin
- cGAS-STING
Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase – Stimulator of Interferon Genes
- PAI-1
Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1
- αIIbβ3
Integrin αIIbβ3 (platelet receptor)
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Authors’ contributions
F. J: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Preparation of article figure, N. J: Writing – review & editing. M.K: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. P.R. and Z.M: Writing. Sobhan Nardast: Writing – review & editing. B.A and A.Z: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
N/A.
Data availability
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wright SL, Kelly FJ. Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(12):6634–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thompson RC, et al. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science. 2004;304(5672):838–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.MacLeod M, et al. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science. 2021;373(6550):61–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Mello A. Focus: plastic fantastic? Lab Chip. 2002;2(2):N31–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams AT, Rangel-Buitrago N. The past, present, and future of plastic pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;176:113429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alam O, Billah M, Yajie D. Characteristics of plastic bags and their potential environmental hazards. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;132:121–9. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hawkins G. Plastic bags: living with rubbish. Int J Cult Stud. 2001;4(1):5–23. [Google Scholar]
- 8.An L, Liu Q, Deng Y, Wu W, Gao Y, Ling W. Sources of microplastic in the environment. In: He D, Luo Y. (eds) Microplastics in terrestrial environments. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer, Cham; 2020:vol 95. 10.1007/698_2020_449.
- 9.Crawford CB, Quinn B. Microplastic pollutants. Elsevier Limited; 2016.
- 10.Connors KA, Dyer SD, Belanger SE. Advancing the quality of environmental microplastic research. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017;36(7):1697–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jahedi F, et al. Characterization of airborne microplastics and exposure assessment in the Mahshahr special economic zone, Northern Persian Gulf. Atmos Pollut Res. 2025. 10.1016/j.apr.2025.102585. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee H-S, Kim Y-J. Estimation of microplastics emission potential in South Korea-For primary source. Volume 22. The Sea: JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF OCEANOGRAPHY; 2017. pp. 135–49. 3. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu W-M, Yang J, Criddle CS. Microplastics pollution and reduction strategies. Front Environ Sci Eng. 2017;11:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kooi M, Koelmans AA. Simplifying microplastic via continuous probability distributions for size, shape, and density. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 2019;6(9):551–7. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Van Cauwenberghe L, et al. Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments. Environ Pollut. 2013;182:495–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Turra A, et al. Three-dimensional distribution of plastic pellets in sandy beaches: shifting paradigms. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parolini M, et al. Microplastic contamination in snow from Western Italian Alps. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang F, et al. Microplastic abundance and distribution in a central Asian desert. Sci Total Environ. 2021;800:149529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sang W, et al. The abundance and characteristics of microplastics in rainwater pipelines in Wuhan, China. Sci Total Environ. 2021;755:142606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Prokić MD, et al. Studying microplastics: lessons from evaluated literature on animal model organisms and experimental approaches. J Hazard Mater. 2021;414:125476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fard NJH, et al. Systematic review of pulmonary toxicity induced by microplastics and nanoplastics: insights from in vivo and in vitro studies. Toxicol Anal Clin. 2025. 10.1016/j.toxac.2024.12.002. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Braun T, et al. Detection of microplastic in human placenta and meconium in a clinical setting. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(7):921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ibrahim YS, et al. Detection of microplastics in human colectomy specimens. JGH Open. 2021;5(1):116–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Przekop R, et al. Effect of microplastic particles on the rheological properties of human saliva and mucus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(22):7037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Amato-Lourenço LF, et al. Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue. J Hazard Mater. 2021;416:126124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jahedi F, et al. Exploring the presence of microplastics in lung lavage of respiratory patients and correlation with airborne microplastics. Atmos Environ. 2025;362:121560. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Horvatits T, et al. Microplastics detected in cirrhotic liver tissue. EBioMedicine. 2022. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ragusa A, et al. Raman microspectroscopy detection and characterisation of microplastics in human breastmilk. Polymers. 2022;14(13):2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alomar C, et al. Microplastic ingestion by mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 fish and its potential for causing oxidative stress. Environ Res. 2017;159:135–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yu P, et al. Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver. Aquat Toxicol. 2018;200:28–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Qiao R, et al. Microplastics induce intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress, and disorders of metabolome and microbiome in zebrafish. Sci Total Environ. 2019;662:246–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jahedi F, et al. Nano and microplastics: unveiling their profound impact on endocrine health. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2025. 10.1080/15376516.2025.2509745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Galloway TS, Cole M, Lewis C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1(5):0116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gewert B, Plassmann MM, MacLeod M. Pathways for degradation of plastic polymers floating in the marine environment. Volume 17. Environmental science: processes & impacts; 2015. pp. 1513–21. 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liang B, et al. Underestimated health risks: polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics jointly induce intestinal barrier dysfunction by ROS-mediated epithelial cell apoptosis. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2021;18(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Avis NE, Smith KW, McKinlay JB. Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can they be changed? Am J Public Health. 1989;79(12):1608–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goodwin J. The frontiers of cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J. 1982;48(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barker DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ. 1995;311(6998):171–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gaziano T et al. Cardiovascular disease. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edition, 2006.
- 40.Wright, S.L., et al. Atmospheric microplastic deposition in an urban environment and an evaluation of transport. Environ Int. 2020;136:105411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lakier JB. Smoking and cardiovascular disease. Am J Med. 1992;93(1):S8-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Steptoe A, Kivimäki M. Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9(6):360–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Araujo JA, et al. Ambient particulate pollutants in the ultrafine range promote early atherosclerosis and systemic oxidative stress. Circ Res. 2008;102(5):589–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Duan Z, et al. Barrier function of zebrafish embryonic chorions against microplastics and nanoplastics and its impact on embryo development. J Hazard Mater. 2020;395:122621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sun M, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity assessment of polyethylene nanoplastics on developing zebrafish embryos. Chemosphere. 2021;282:131124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang H, et al. Toxicity comparison of nano-sized and micron-sized microplastics to goldfish Carassius auratus larvae. J Hazard Mater. 2020;388:122058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wei J, et al. The impact of polystyrene microplastics on cardiomyocytes pyroptosis through NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling pathway and oxidative stress in Wistar rats. Environ Toxicol. 2021;36(5):935–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Aggarwal P, et al. Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(6):428–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nguyen B, et al. Separation and analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics in complex environmental samples. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(4):858–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Takkouche B, Norman G. PRISMA statement. Epidemiology. 2011;22(1):128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hu QL, et al. Polystyrene nanoparticles trigger the activation of p38 MAPK and apoptosis via inducing oxidative stress in zebrafish and macrophage cells. Environ Pollut. 2021. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Santos AL, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics induce developmental impairments and vasotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Hazard Mater. 2024;464:132880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang J, et al. Polystyrene microplastics cause tissue damages, sex-specific reproductive disruption and transgenerational effects in marine Medaka (Oryzias melastigma). Environ Pollut. 2019;254Pt B:p113024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pan Y, et al. Microplastics can affect the trophic cascade strength and stability of plankton ecosystems via behavior-mediated indirect interactions. J Hazard Mater. 2022;430:128415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Feng M, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastic exposure induces developmental toxicity by activating the oxidative stress response and base excision repair pathway in zebrafish (Danio rerio). ACS Omega. 2022;7(36):32153–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang R, et al. Combined toxicity of microplastics and cadmium on the zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio). Sci Total Environ. 2020;743:140638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Veneman WJ, et al. Pathway analysis of systemic transcriptome responses to injected polystyrene particles in zebrafish larvae. Aquat Toxicol. 2017;190:112–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang X, et al. Photolytic degradation elevated the toxicity of polylactic acid microplastics to developing zebrafish by triggering mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. J Hazard Mater. 2021;413:125321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang Y, et al. Polyacrylonitrile microfibers pose a significant threat to the early-stage survival of zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol. 2023;265:106755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang J, et al. Polystyrene microplastics cause tissue damages, sex-specific reproductive disruption and transgenerational effects in marine Medaka (Oryzias melastigma). Environ Pollut. 2019;254:113024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.La Pietra A, et al. Polystyrene microplastics effects on zebrafish embryological development: comparison of two different sizes. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024;106:104371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Guo J, et al. Polystyrene microplastics facilitate the biotoxicity and biomagnification of ZnO nanoparticles in the food chain from algae to daphnia. Environ Pollut. 2023;324:121181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang Q, et al. Polystyrene microplastics induce myocardial inflammation and cell death via the TLR4/NF-κB pathway in carp. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023;135:108690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hu Q, et al. Polystyrene nanoparticles trigger the activation of p38 MAPK and apoptosis via inducing oxidative stress in zebrafish and macrophage cells. Environ Pollut. 2021;269:116075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wu H, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial inflammation in carp by promoting ROS production. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022;125:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li Y, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics aggravated ecotoxicological effects of polychlorinated biphenyls in on zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Geosci Front. 2022;13(3):101376. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Varshney S, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics enhance the toxicological effects of DDE in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. Sci Total Environ. 2023;859:160457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bhagat J, et al. Effects of nanoplastic on toxicity of Azole fungicides (ketoconazole and fluconazole) in zebrafish embryos. Sci Total Environ. 2021;800:149463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Prata JC, et al. Effects of virgin and weathered polystyrene and polypropylene microplastics on Raphidocelis subcapitata and embryos of Danio rerio under environmental concentrations. Sci Total Environ. 2022;816:151642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Aishwarya V, et al. Determination of microplastics in the wetlands of specific regional area and unveiling the toxic properties of predominant HDPE particle on animal and plant models. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2024;182:1047–59. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yu F, et al. Bisphenol A decreases the developmental toxicity and histopathological alterations caused by polystyrene nanoplastics in developing marine medaka Oryzias melastigma. Chemosphere. 2023;336:139174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Teng M, et al. Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior. Environ Int. 2022. 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sim Y, et al. Combined effects of microplastics and benz[a]anthracene on cardiotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae: size matters. Chemosphere. 2023;330:138723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dimitriadi A, et al. Adverse effects polystyrene microplastics exert on zebrafish heart – molecular to individual level. J Hazard Mater. 2021. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.do Nascimento LS, et al. Deleterious effects of polypropylene microplastic ingestion in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2023;111(1):13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yan X, et al. Chemical features and biological effects of degradation products of biodegradable plastics in simulated small waterbody environment. Sci Total Environ. 2023;904:166829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pitt JA, et al. Uptake, tissue distribution, and toxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat Toxicol. 2018;194:185–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Xu KH, et al. Toxicological effects of nanoplastics and phenanthrene to zebrafish (Danio rerio). Gondwana Res. 2022;108:127–32. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chang M, et al. Warming, temperature fluctuations and thermal evolution change the effects of microplastics at an environmentally relevant concentration. Environ Pollut. 2022. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Park IH, Geum SW, Yeo MK. Reduced cellular process and developmental process genotoxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics in zebrafish embryogenesis using Aurelia aurita proteins. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2023;19(4):829–42. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cheng H, et al. Toxicities of microplastic fibers and granules on the development of zebrafish embryos and their combined effects with cadmium. Chemosphere. 2021;269:128677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sai S, et al. Risk assessment of potential toxicity induced by bio and synthetic plastic microspheres in lates calcarifer. Chemosphere. 2022;298:134269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zhang Q, et al. Size matters either way: Differently-sized microplastics affect amphibian host and symbiotic microbiota discriminately. Environ Pollut. 2023;328:121634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wang Q, et al. Toxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics and polybrominated diphenyl ethers to zebrafish (Danio rerio). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022;126:21–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.de Souza Teodoro L, et al. Toxic effects of environmental-relevant exposure to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) micro and nanoparticles in zebrafish early development. NanoImpact. 2024;33:100497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Xia B, et al. Secondary PVC microplastics are more toxic than primary PVC microplastics to Oryzias melastigma embryos. J Hazard Mater. 2022. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhang P, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering labeled nanoplastic models for reliable bio-nano interaction investigations. J Hazard Mater. 2022. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Xu EG, et al. Primary and secondary plastic particles exhibit limited acute toxicity but chronic effects on daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(11):6859–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kolarević S, et al. Single and combined potential of polystyrene microparticles and fluoranthene in the induction of DNA damage in haemocytes of mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Mutagenesis. 2023;38(1):3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Chen Y, et al. Multi-biomarkers hazard assessment of microplastics with different polymers by acute embryo test and chronic larvae test with zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat Toxicol. 2023. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sulukan E, et al. Nano-sized polystyrene plastic particles affect many cancer-related biological processes even in the next generations; zebrafish modeling. Sci Total Environ. 2022;838(Pt 3):156391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Li Y, et al. Low level of polystyrene microplastics decreases early developmental toxicity of phenanthrene on marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma). J Hazard Mater. 2020. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Chen JC, et al. Microplastics negatively impact embryogenesis and modulate the immune response of the marine medaka Oryzias melastigma. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;158:111349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Jaworska-Wilczynska M, et al. Pericardium: structure and function in health and disease. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2016;54(3):121–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Yamani N, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and management of pericardial effusion- review. Ann Med Surg. 2022;80:104142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wiegand J, et al. Triphenyl phosphate-induced pericardial edema in zebrafish embryos is reversible following depuration in clean water. Aquat Toxicol. 2023;263:106699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bhagat J, et al. Zebrafish: an emerging model to study microplastic and nanoplastic toxicity. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Guzzetti E, et al. Microplastic in marine organism: environmental and toxicological effects. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;64:164–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cherr GN, Fairbairn E, Whitehead A. Impacts of petroleum-derived pollutants on fish development. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2017;5:185–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Xu K, et al. Toxicological effects of microplastics and phenanthrene to zebrafish (Danio rerio). Sci Total Environ. 2021;757:143730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Xia B, et al. Secondary PVC microplastics are more toxic than primary PVC microplastics to Oryzias melastigma embryos. J Hazard Mater. 2022;424:127421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Lu T et al. Potential Effects of Orally Ingesting Polyethylene Terephthalate Microplastics on the Mouse Heart. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2024;1–11. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 103.Mierzejewski K, et al. New insights into the potential effects of PET microplastics on organisms via extracellular vesicle-mediated communication. Sci Total Environ. 2023;904:166967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Han Y, et al. No prominent toxicity of polyethylene microplastics observed in neonatal mice following intratracheal instillation to dams during gestational and neonatal period. Toxicol Res. 2021. 10.1007/s43188-020-00086-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhang M, et al. A novel tiRNA-Glu-CTC induces nanoplastics accelerated vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching and vascular injury through mitochondrial damage. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:169515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Li Z, et al. Polystyrene microplastics cause cardiac fibrosis by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats. Environ Pollut. 2020;265:115025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Zhao J, et al. Polystyrene bead ingestion promotes adiposity and cardiometabolic disease in mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;232:113239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Zhang Z, et al. Polystyrene microplastics induce size-dependent multi-organ damage in mice: insights into gut microbiota and fecal metabolites. J Hazard Mater. 2024;461:132503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liu Z, et al. Polystyrene microplastics induced female reproductive toxicity in mice. J Hazard Mater. 2022;424:127629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Ye J, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics and cadmium co-exposure aggravated cardiomyocyte damage in mice by regulating PANoptosis pathway. Environ Pollut. 2024;347:123713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhang Y, et al. Polystyrene microplastics-induced cardiotoxicity in chickens via the ROS-driven NF-κB-NLRP3-GSDMD and AMPK-PGC-1α axes. Sci Total Environ. 2022;840:156727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Lin P, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics exacerbate lipopolysaccharide-induced myocardial fibrosis and autophagy in mice via ROS/TGF-β1/Smad. Toxicology. 2022;480:153338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Zhang Y, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-controlled autophagic pathway promotes polystyrene microplastics-induced myocardial dysplasia in birds. Environ Pollut. 2022. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Wang B, Liang B, Huang Y, Li Z, Zhang B, Du J, Ye R, Xian H, Deng Y, XiuJ, Yang X, Ichihara S, Ichihara G, Zhong Y, Huang Z. Long-Chain Acyl Carnitines Aggravate Polystyrene Nanoplastics-Induced Atherosclerosis by Upregulating MARCO. Adv. Sci. 2023;10:2205876. 10.1002/advs.202205876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 115.Guševac Stojanović I, et al. Acute toxicity assessment of orally administered microplastic particles in adult male Wistar rats. Toxics. 2024. 10.3390/toxics12030167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bilan MV, Lieshchova MA, Brygadyrenko VV. The effect of polystyrene foam in different doses on the blood parameters and relative mass of internal organs of white mice. Biosyst Divers. 2022;30(4):436–41. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lu T, et al. Potential effects of orally ingesting polyethylene terephthalate microplastics on the mouse heart. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2024;24(3):291–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Zhang M, Shi J, Deng H. Transcriptome-wide m6A modification mediates cardiotoxicity in mice after chronic exposure to microplastics. Chemosphere. 2023. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Shi J, Deng H, Zhang M. Whole transcriptome sequencing analysis revealed key RNA profiles and toxicity in mice after chronic exposure to microplastics. Chemosphere. 2022. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Cary CM, et al. Single pulmonary nanopolystyrene exposure in late-stage pregnancy dysregulates maternal and fetal cardiovascular function. Toxicol Sci. 2024. 10.1093/toxsci/kfae019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Wang K, et al. Nanoplastics causes heart aging/myocardial cell senescence through the Ca(2+)/mtDNA/cGAS-STING signaling cascade. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Salla RF, et al. Microplastics and TiO(2) nanoparticles mixture as an emerging threat to amphibians: a case study on bullfrog embryos. Environ Pollut. 2024;346:123624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Wang M, et al. Nanoplastics causes extensive congenital malformations during embryonic development by passively targeting neural crest cells. Environ Int. 2023;173:107865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Zhang M, et al. N6-methyladenosine methylation mediates non-coding RNAs modification in microplastic-induced cardiac injury. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;262:115174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zhang T, et al. Multi-dimensional evaluation of cardiotoxicity in mice following respiratory exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2023;20(1):46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Zhou Y, et al. Low-dose of polystyrene microplastics induce cardiotoxicity in mice and human-originated cardiac organoids. Environ Int. 2023;179:108171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Roshanzadeh A, et al. Exposure to nanoplastics impairs collective contractility of neonatal cardiomyocytes under electrical synchronization. Biomaterials. 2021;278:121175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Shiwakoti S, et al. Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on endothelium senescence and its underlying mechanism. Environ Int. 2022;164:107248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Li J, et al. Embryonic exposure of polystyrene nanoplastics affects cardiac development. Sci Total Environ. 2024;906:167406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Das A. The emerging role of microplastics in systemic toxicity: involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Sci Total Environ. 2023. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Hu M, Palić D. Micro-and nano-plastics activation of oxidative and inflammatory adverse outcome pathways. Redox Biol. 2020;37:101620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.da Araujo C, A.P. and, Malafaia G. Microplastic ingestion induces behavioral disorders in mice: A preliminary study on the trophic transfer effects via tadpoles and fish. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Liu M, et al. Research advances of microplastics and potential health risks of microplastics on terrestrial higher mammals: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. Environ Geochem Health. 2023;45(6):2803–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Persiani E, et al. Microplastics: a matter of the heart (and vascular system). Biomedicines. 2023;11(2):264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Florance I, Ramasubbu S. Current Understanding on the role of lipids in macrophages and associated diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;24(1):589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Florance I, et al. Exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics impairs lipid metabolism in human and murine macrophages in vitro. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;238:113612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Nemmar A, et al. Ultrafine particles affect experimental thrombosis in an in vivo hamster model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(7):998–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Smyth E, et al. Induction and enhancement of platelet aggregation in vitro and in vivo by model polystyrene nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9(3):356–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Sheng C, et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics enhance thrombosis through adsorption of plasma proteins. J Hazard Mater. 2024;480:136168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Huo C, et al. Polystyrene microplastics induce injury to the vascular endothelial through NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis. Environ Toxicol. 2024;39(11):5086–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Prata JC, et al. Suspected microplastics in Atlantic horse mackerel fish (Trachurus trachurus) captured in Portugal. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;174:113249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Li Z, et al. Polystyrene microplastics cause cardiac fibrosis by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats. Environ Pollut. 2020;265Pt A:p115025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Liu Z, et al. Polystyrene microplastics induced female reproductive toxicity in mice. J Hazard Mater. 2022;424Pt C:p127629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Nemmar A, et al. Size effect of intratracheally instilled particles on pulmonary inflammation and vascular thrombosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003;186(1):38–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Marfella R, et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(10):900–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Prattichizzo F, et al. Micro-nanoplastics and cardiovascular diseases: evidence and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(38):4099–110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Zheng H, et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in cardiovascular disease—a narrative review with worrying links. Front Toxicol. 2024;6:1479292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Gal R, et al. The effect of resveratrol on the cardiovascular system from molecular mechanisms to clinical results. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. 10.3390/ijms221810152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Graton ME, et al. Comparative study between Apocynin and Protocatechuic acid regarding antioxidant capacity and vascular effects. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1047916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Młynarska E, et al. The role of antioxidants in the therapy of cardiovascular diseases—a literature review. Nutrients. 2024;16(16):2587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Wedgwood S, et al. Apocynin improves oxygenation and increases eNOS in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302(6):L616–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Lin A, et al. Shear-regulated uptake of nanoparticles by endothelial cells and development of endothelial-targeting nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93(3):833–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.




