Abstract
Background
Patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) typically have fewer retrieved oocytes and lower pregnancy rates than normal responders. Therefore, maximizing oocyte yield is particularly important to improve their reproductive outcomes.
Aim
The purpose of this study was to improve reproductive outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) by determining the optimal follicle size to induce final oocyte maturation in patients with DOR.
Methods
A total of 430 follicles from 98 DOR patients were included in this study. Controlled ovarian stimulation was conducted by a GnRH antagonist protocol, with ovulation triggered when the leading follicle reached ≥ 17 mm, followed by oocyte retrieval 36 h later. On the day of oocyte retrieval, in the operating theatre, all follicles were carefully measured, one by one, by a second trained individual just before aspiration. Then, each follicle was aspirated separately and collected in a separate tube. Throughout the laboratory process, oocytes were tracked and managed based on the size of the follicle from which they originated. Based on follicle size, 11–14 mm, 15–17 mm, and ≥ 18 mm, the follicles were divided into three groups. Reproductive outcomes in this study were included Cumulus Oocyte Complex (COC) retrieval rate, metaphase II (MII) oocyte rate, fertilization rate, and top-quality embryo (TQE) rate.
Results
The final analysis included a total of 430 follicles were measured and aspirated. Follicles measuring 15–17 mm exhibited a significantly higher COC retrieval rate (88.1%), MII oocyte rate (83.3%), fertilization rate (97.1%), and TQE rate (65.4%), in comparison to follicles measuring 11–14 mm and ≥ 18 mm (p < 0.05). The COC retrieval rate and the MII retrieval rate were 79.16% and 66.66%, for follicles measuring 14 mm, and were 45.09% and 33.33%, for follicles measuring 13 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). ROC analysis identified an optimal follicle size of 14.5–15.5 mm for COC retrieval. The incidence of premature ovulation was 13.27% and the mean size of the leading follicle on the day of trigger was 18.6 mm in patients with premature ovulation.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that oocyte retrieval, maturation and embryo development are optimized by triggering final oocyte maturation at a follicle size of 15–17 mm. In addition, there is a need to reconsider the standard trigger criteria in these patients.
Keywords: Diminished ovarian reserve, Follicle size, Final trigger, Oocyte maturation, In vitro fertilization
Background
Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR) is generally characterized by a reduced number and declined quality of oocytes, which can lead to a poor response in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles to ovarian stimulation [1]. Patients with DOR often represent a challenge for assisted reproductive technology (ART) due to the low number of oocytes and premature ovulation. Therefore, there is a higher probability of cycle cancellation, and the pregnancy rate is lower compared to those of normal responders [2, 3]. In IVF, multiple follicles of different sizes are allowed to grow during a controlled ovarian stimulation cycle. Therefore, follicle growth monitoring is critical to obtain a high number of mature oocytes [4]. The relationship between oocyte maturation and follicle size is well known [4]. Determining the optimal follicle size for triggering is crucial because the administration of HCG for triggering causes LH surge, leading to the resumption of meiosis and final oocyte maturation [5].
While several studies demonstrated that follicle size is correlated with IVF outcome in normal responders, it remains uncertain in patients with DOR [6]. Early triggering results in an immature oocyte, whereas a delayed triggering increases the post mature oocyte and premature ovulation [7]. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) concludes that a lead follicle size of 16–22 mm is appropriate to trigger final oocyte maturation in normal responders, but this threshold is still controversial for DOR patients [8].
In patients with DOR, decreased antral follicle numbers, accelerated follicular recruitment, and higher levels of early follicular phase FSH result in faster follicular development. This leads to early ovulation and shorter follicular phases and menstrual cycles [9]. Therefore, in patients with DOR who have fewer follicles available for oocyte retrieval, the relationship between follicle size and oocyte maturation is critical for optimizing reproductive outcomes [10]. Consequently, it has been proposed that women with normal ovarian reserve are basically different from poor responder women, therefore cannot be assessed in the same way during stimulation of the ovaries [11]. It appears a small follicle size should be used to induce final oocyte maturation in these patients [12].
Currently, the POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) grouping system has been introduced for improvement of pregnancy rates in poor responders [13]. Group 1 and 2 patients have sufficient parameters of the ovarian reserve, antral follicular count (AFC) >5 and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) >1.2 ng/mL, but with an unexpectedly poor or suboptimal response from the ovaries. Group 3 was defined as patients < 35 years of age with AFC < 5 and AMH < 1.2 ng/mL and group 4 patients ≥ 35 years of age with AFC < 5 and AMH < 1.2 ng/mL [14].
In this study, we set out to determine the optimal leading follicle size to induce final oocyte maturation in DOR patients.
Methods
The present single-center cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2023 and December 2024 at the Shahid Beheshti infertility clinic in Isfahan, Iran. A total of 116 patients aged between 22 and 44 years with DOR undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)/IVF treatment based on the POSEIDON criteria were included. Patients were in groups 3 and 4 poor responders.
Exclusion criteria included (i) having endocrine disorders: hyperprolactinemia and hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, (ii) endometriosis, (iii) male or female chromosomal abnormalities, (iv) Genetic disorder, (v) body mass index more than 29 kg/m2, (vi) azoospermia in male partner.
On day 2 of the cycle, all patients underwent vaginal ultrasound examination to roll out the presence of follicle size more than 10 mm in size. Baseline hormonal profiles were also part of the evaluation. Controlled ovarian induction was performed using an antagonist protocol, with the administration of gonadotropins 300 IU/day of recombinant FSH (Gonal F, Merck, Germany) and/or human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG; Menopur, Merck, Germany) starting on the second day of the cycle. The GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day (Cetrotide, Merck, Germany) was started in a fixed antagonist protocol on day 6 of stimulation. Vaginal ultrasound was used to measure follicles, and the size of follicles was calculated as the mean of the two largest diameters. Administration of 0.2 mg of GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl, Ipsen) and 5,000 IU HCG (Pregnyl; Organon, Vienna, Austria) in a double trigger form was used when at least one follicle had reached 17 mm for ovulation. Hormonal tests including estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), and progesterone (P) were assessed on the day of the trigger. Thirty-six hours after trigger administration, ovum pickup (OPU) was performed. Ultrasonography was conducted prior to surgery and OPU has been cancelled due to premature ovulation. Premature ovulation was defined as at least one of the leading follicles ruptured on the day of egg retrieval. In the operating theatre, following the induction of general anesthesia, a transvaginal ultrasound was performed to evaluate the ovaries and assess the number of follicles. All follicles were carefully measured, one by one, by a second trained individual. The size of follicles was calculated using the mean of the largest vertical and horizontal diameters. A 17-gauge double-lumen aspiration needle was then inserted into each follicle. Follicular fluid was aspirated under a pressure of 110 mmHg and collected in a separate tube. The aspirated fluid was immediately transferred to the embryology laboratory to examine to identify the presence of a cumulus-oocyte complex (COC). If a COC was recovered, the next follicle was similarly measured and aspirated into a new tube, if the oocyte was not retrieved with the native follicular fluid, the follicle was flushed with media (Modified Ham’s F-10; Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA). In cases where no oocyte was obtained after flushing, the aspiration system was rinsed with media to recover any oocyte that might have been retained within the lumen of the needle or tubing. This procedure was repeated for all accessible follicles. Each retrieved COC was placed in a pre-labeled 60 × 15 mm culture dish, with each droplet corresponding to the original follicular size. The incubation was done for COCs, 2–3 h before denudation. After removing the cumulus cells, the maturation status of each oocyte was assessed and classified as germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (MI), or metaphase II (MII).
Mature (MII) oocytes were injected via ICSI and placed in individually labeled culture droplets, to preserve the identity of each follicle. Fertilization was assessed 16 to 20 h post-injection, with normal fertilization defined by the presence of two polar bodies and two pronuclei (2PN) [15]. Each embryo was cultured and evaluated after 72 h. A top-quality embryo (TQE) was defined as an 8-cell embryo with blastomeres of uniform size and no more than 5% fragmentation [16]. Development of each embryo was carefully assessed to correlate its quality with the size of its originating follicle.
On the basis of follicle size, the follicles were separated into three groups; Group 1: mean diameter of 11–14 mm, Group 2: mean diameter of 15–17 mm, and Group 3: mean diameter of ≥ 18 mm. This classification was based on the statistical distribution of the data to enhance the power of the analysis.
The reproductive outcomes of this study included the COC retrieval rate, the MII oocyte rate, the rate of fertilization, and the TQE rate. The rate of COC retrieval was calculated as the number of COCs retrieved to the number of follicles aspirated. The rate of MII oocyte is the result of the number of MII oocytes obtained per aspirated follicles, while the ratio of MII oocyte was determined as the number of MII oocytes to the total number of obtained COCs. The fertilization rate was determined by 2PN fertilized oocytes to the number of MII oocytes. Finally, the rate of TQE is the result of the number of TQE obtained from the total number of 2PN fertilized oocytes. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee (NO. IR.MUI.REC.1403.043). This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort tracking outcomes from standard procedures without therapeutic intervention or randomization; therefore, it was not registered as a clinical trial.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 28, Chicago, IL, USA). For assess the normality of the data distribution, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used. Mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the median and the interquartile range were applied for parametric variables and nonparametric data, respectively. Chi-square test (χ²) was used for comparisons of categorical variables where appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between follicle size and reproductive outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders. An ROC curve was created to predict COC retrieval. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Of the 116 patients who were included during the study period, 18 subjects were excluded from the study due to inadequate response to stimulation in 3 patients and premature ovulation in 15 patients. In the final analysis, 98 patients were part of the study and a total of 430 follicles were available for measurement and aspiration. The basic characteristics of 98 patients who were retrieved are shown in Table 1. The average age of the patients was 36.03 ± 5.16 years, ranging from 23 to 43, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.45 ± 1.59, the mean AMH level was 0.73 ± 0.28. The mean levels of LH, E2 and P on the trigger day were 4.81 ± 2.61, 922.11 ± 401.65, and 0.68 ± 0.32, respectively. Other variables are summarized in the Table 1.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the study population (N = 98 patients)
| Variables | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36.03 ± 5.16 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 22.45 ± 1.59 |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 6.21 ± 3.90 |
| AMH (ng/mL) | 0.73 ± 0.28 |
| Basal FSH (mIU/mL) | 8.10 ± 2.59 |
| Basal LH (mIU/mL) | 5.50 ± 1.48 |
| Basal Estradiol (pmol/L) | 31.51 ± 3.61 |
| Basal Progesterone (ng/mL) | 0.57 ± 0.15 |
| LH on trigger day (mIU/mL) | 4.81 ± 2.61 |
| Estradiol on trigger day (pmol/L) | 922.11 ± 401.65 |
| Progesterone on trigger day (ng/mL) | 0.68 ± 0.32 |
| Total gonadotropin dose (IU) | 3042 ± 559.04 |
| Duration of stimulation (days) | 8.17 ± 1.36 |
The number of aspirated follicles in each group were 155 (36.04%) 11–14 mm (group 1), 168 (39.06%) 15–17 mm (group 2), and 107 (24.88%) ≥ 18 mm (group 3).
The COC retrieval rate was significantly higher in the group 2 (88.1%) in comparison with group 1 (45.8%) and group 3 (66.4%), while the probability of retrieving MII oocytes was lower in group 1 (33.5%) and group 3 (58.9%) compared to group 2 (83.3%). Moreover, the likelihood of retrieving an MII oocyte among patients with COC in the group 2 (94.6%) was more than the group 1 (73.2%) and the group 3 (88.7%). Furthermore, fertilization rate among those who had a MII oocyte, were significantly higher in the group 2 (97.1%) compared with the group 1 (59.6%) and the group 3 (57.1%).
In addition, group 2 (97.1%) compared to group 1 (59.6%) and group 3 (57.1%) had a significantly higher fertilization rate among those with an MII oocyte (Table 2).
Table 2.
Reproductive outcomes based on follicle size.
| Outcomes | 11–14 mm | 15–17 mm | ≥ 18 mm | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COC retrieval rate, % | 71/155 (45.8%) | 148/168 (88.1%) | 71/107 (66.4%) | 0.001 |
| MII oocyte rate, % | 52/155 (33.5%) | 140/168 (83.3%) | 63/107 (58.9%) | 0.001 |
| MII/COC ratio, % | 52/71 (73.2%) | 140/148 (94.6%) | 63/71 (88.7%) | 0.001 |
| Fertilization rate, % | 31/52 (59.60%) | 136/140 (97.1%) | 36/63 (57.1%) | 0.001 |
| TQE rate, % | 13/31 (38.7%) | 89/136 (65.4%) | 21/36 (58.3%) | 0.001 |
In the adjusted multivariable analysis, these statically significant differences were also observed, as shown in table (Table 3)
Table 3.
Multivariable analysis of stimulation outcomes based on follicle size
| Outcomes | Follicle size | OR, 95% CI, p-value (crude) |
Adjusted OR, 95% CI, p-value (multivariable) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COC | 11–14 mm | - | - |
| 15–17 mm | 8.75 (4.98–15.38, P = 0.000) | 8.51 (4.79–15.11, P = 0.000) | |
| ≥ 18 mm | 2.33 (1.40–3.88, P = 0.001) | 2.24 (1.33–3.79, P = 0.002) | |
| MII | 11–14 mm | - | - |
| 15–17 mm | 9.90 (5.85–16.74, P = 0.000) | 10.02(5.82–17.25, P = 0.000) | |
| ≥ 18 mm | 2.83 (1.70–4.72, P = 0.000) | 2.69 (1.59–4.54, P = 0.000) | |
| 2PN | 11–14 mm | - | - |
| 15–17 mm | 14.25 (6.69–30.35, P = 0.000) | 15.66 (7.13–34.40, P = 0.000) | |
| ≥ 18 mm | 1.29 (0.66–2.51, P = 0.446) | 1.30 (0.66–2.58, P = 0.444) | |
| TQE | 11–14 mm | - | - |
| 15–17 mm | 6.84 (3.45–13.57, P = 0.000) | 6.47 (3.31–13.72, P = 0.000) | |
| ≥ 18 mm | 1.90 (0.86–4.19, P = 0.108) | 1.87 (0.83–4.21, P = 0.128) |
Ref group was: 11–14
In addition, an analysis was conducted on Group 2 to determine the COC retrieval rate, MII oocyte rate, fertilization rate and TQE rate for follicles measuring 15, 16, and 17 mm. The findings are summarized in Table 4. The findings revealed no statistically significant differences within this group.
Table 4.
Reproductive outcomes in follicles 15–17 mm in size (group 2)
| Outcomes | 15 mm | 16 mm | 17 mm | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COC retrieved rate, % | 53/56 (94.6%) | 49/55 (89.1%) | 46/57 (80.7%) | 0.07 |
| MII retrieved rate, % | 48/56 (85.7%) | 46/55 (83.6%) | 46/57 (80.7%) | 0.77 |
| MII/COC ratio, % | 48/53 (90.56%) | 46/49 (93.8%) | 46/46 (100%) | 0.82 |
| Fertilization rate, % | 46/48 (95.83%) | 44/46 (95.65%) | 46/46 (100%) | 0.72 |
| TQE rate, % | 30/46 (65.21%) | 31/44 (70.45%) | 28/46 (60.86%) | 0.86 |
Furthermore, follicles 11–14 mm in diameter were analyzed separately. MII oocyte rate were 4.54% for follicles 11 mm in size and were 5.88%, for follicles 12 mm in size (P > 0.05), but none of the oocytes retrieved from follicles resulted in successful fertilization or TQE. In addition, the COC retrieval rate and MII oocyte rate were 79.16% and 66.66%, for follicles 14 mm in size and were 45.09% and 33.33%, respectively, for follicles 13 mm in size (p ≤ 0.05), but the rate of fertilization and rate of TQE were not significant.
We conducted subgroup analysis to compare outcomes between POSEIDON group 3 (less than 35 years) and POSEIDON group 4 (35 years and older). There were no statistically significant differences in subgroup analysis of POSEIDON 3 and 4 based on the age groups. we found that optimum follicle size for good outcomes (15–17 mm) was similar in both groups. More details are shown in Table 5.
Table 5.
Comparison between POSEIDON group 3 and 4
| Outcomes | POSEIDON group III (age < 35) | POSEIDON group IV (age ≥ 35) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 35(35.72%) | 63(64.28%) | |
| Number of follicles | 164(38.14%) | 266(61.86%) | |
| COC retrieval rate, % | 113/164(68.9%) | 218/266(81.9%) | 0.61 |
| MII oocyte rate, % | 99/164(60.3%) | 156/266(58.6%) | 0.72 |
| Fertilization rate, % | 79/99(79.7%) | 124/156(79.4%) | 0.75 |
| TQE rate, % | 49/79(62%) | 78/124(62.9%) | 0.91 |
The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was 0.647 (95%CI: 0.580–0.713, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off point for follicle size was found to be 14.5 mm, giving a sensitivity of 75.5% and a specificity of 60.0%. Alternatively, a cut-off of 15.5 mm resulted in a sensitivity of 57.2% and a specificity of 62.1%. The ROC curve showed that an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was observed for follicles 14.5–15.5 mm in size. These results suggest that follicle size can be a moderate predictor of COC retrieval (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
The ROC curve analysis results for predicting retrieval of COC
Among those who were scheduled for oocyte retrieval, 15 (13.27%) had premature ovulation. More details about the comparisons between the patients with premature ovulation and the controls are shown in Table 6. In the premature ovulation group, serum FSH levels were significantly higher (14.30 ± 1.98 vs. 7.10 ± 2.59), while AMH was significantly lower compared to control group (0.43 ± 0.20 vs. 0.93 ± 0.28). The mean serum progesterone and LH levels on the day of trigger were significantly higher in the premature ovulation group compared to control subjects (Table 6). The mean size of the leading follicle on the day of trigger was 18.6 mm in premature ovulation group.
Table 6.
Comparison of baseline parameters between premature ovulation and control groups
| Variables | Control group N = 98 |
Premature ovulation N = 15 |
p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36.03 ± 5.16 | 38.07 ± 5.04 | 0.26 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.45 ± 1.59 | 22.65 ± 1.53 | 0.78 |
| Duration of Infertility (years) | 6.21 ± 3.90 | 6.72 ± 1.70 | 0.93 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 0.93 ± 0.28 | 0.43 ± 0.20 | < 0.05 |
| Basal FSH (mIU/mL) | 7.10 ± 2.59 | 14.30 ± 1.98 | < 0.05 |
| Basal LH (mIU/mL) | 5.50 ± 1.48 | 7.22 ± 2.20 | 0.89 |
| Basal Estradiol (pmol/L) | 31.51 ± 3.61 | 33.60 ± 6.65 | 0.64 |
| Basal Progesterone (ng/mL) | 0.57 ± 0.15 | 0.68 ± 0.16 | 0.77 |
| LH on trigger day (mIU/mL) | 4.81 ± 2.61 | 20.27 ± 2.93 | < 0.05 |
| Progesterone on trigger day (ng/mL) | 0.68 ± 0.32 | 1.32 ± 0.28 | < 0.05 |
| Estradiol on trigger day (pmol/L) | 922.11 ± 401.65 | 861.93 ± 282.73 | 0.60 |
| Duration of Stimulation (day) | 8.17 ± 1.36 | 7.47 ± 0.64 | 0.79 |
| Total gonadotropin dose (IU) | 3042.73 ± 559.04 | 2941.65 ± 239.98 | 0.18 |
| GnRh Antagonist duration (day) | 2.76 ± 0.90 | 1.93 ± 0.70 | 0.69 |
Discussion
DOR patients typically have fewer retrieved oocytes and lower pregnancy rates than normal responders. Therefore, maximizing oocyte yield is particularly important to improve their reproductive outcomes [3]. On the other hand, one of the main concerns in these patients is premature ovulation, which can lead to cycle cancelation. Consequently, determining the optimal leading follicle size for triggering final oocyte maturation in DOR patients is critical to maximize oocyte yield and prevent premature ovulation. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the optimal leading follicle size for triggering final oocyte maturation in these patients based on POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 poor responders.
Our study shows that the probability of rate of COC retrieval, MII oocyte, fertilization, and TQE were significantly higher in follicle size 15–17 mm in DOR patients. Also, follicles 13 and 14 mm in diameter were significant for the COC retrieval rate and the MII oocyte rate, but not for the fertilization rate and the TQE rate. In addition, we demonstrated that among all aspirated follicles, the highest sensitivity and specificity for COC were observed at 14.4–15.5 mm by ROC curve analysis.
In ART cycles, accurate measurement of follicles and the timing of triggering for maturation of final oocyte is crucial to obtain the maximum number of mature oocytes and TQE [17]. The current protocol is that when 2 or 3 lead follicles have reached a diameter of 17–18 mm, final oocyte maturation is induced in normal responders [18]. In a normal responder population, the ESHRE guidelines recommend that a lead follicle size of 16–22 mm be used for triggering [19].
Several studies have found that size of follicle is related to oocyte maturity. Mehri et al. have shown that follicles larger than 18 mm at the time of retrieval predominantly contain a greater number of mature oocytes and have a higher rate of fertilization [20]. Another research by Rosen et al. showed that in an unselected IVF population, follicles 16–18 mm had significantly lower mature oocytes rates and fertilization than follicles larger than 18 mm [21]. Other studies have indicated that MII oocytes are more likely to be found in medium and large follicle groups, suggesting that follicles larger than 15 mm are most likely to contain mature oocytes [4, 22, 23]. It is important to note that an early trigger will result in the yielding of immature oocytes and a fewer mature oocytes [7].Therefore, in order to obtain a larger follicular pool and more viable embryos, it is reasonable to prolong the stimulation period [24].
On the contrary, Kolibianakis et al. reported that in IVF cycle, large follicles (≥ 17 mm) may result in follicular luteinization, leading to a lower ongoing pregnancy rate [25]. On the other hand, delayed triggering results in more follicle growth and subsequent high levels of P, which negatively influence pregnancy rates in fresh embryo transfer cycles [26]. However, all of mentioned studies mainly focused on normal responders, which is in contrast to the results obtained in the present study in patients with DOR. It seems that in patients with DOR, due to physiological changes, postponement of triggering, cause premature ovulation and cycle cancellation [27]. Our results revealed that follicles measuring 18 mm or larger were associated with poorer outcomes in DOR patients. Specifically, both fertilization rates and TQE formation were significantly lower in the ≥ 18 mm group compared to the 15–17 mm group.
Distinctive features can be observed when comparing the ovarian physiology of patients with DOR and normal responders. Pre-antral and small antral follicles produce AMH, which inhibit FSH-induced aromatase activity and regulate follicular recruitment [28]. In DOR patients, reduced in the antral follicles and AMH level results in a decrease in luteal phase inhibition of FSH-induced aromatase activity, recruitment of early dominant follicle, and accelerated follicular development [24]. This progression leads to early ovulation, a shorter follicular phase, and a shorter menstrual cycle length [29]. Increasing basal FSH levels in women with DOR has a critical role in shaping follicular development. High FSH levels promote earlier maturation of granulosa cells, which leads to premature expression of LH receptors. As a result, follicles in DOR patients may be competent for ovulation at smaller sizes in comparison with those seen in women with normal ovarian reserve [30]. This altered physiology suggests that follicles in these patients may achieve functional maturity sooner, which emphasize the need for adjusted timing when triggering final oocyte maturation. Recognizing this shift is essential in tailoring individualized stimulation and trigger strategies to optimize clinical outcomes in this challenging patient population.
Therefore, considering the pathophysiological changes in patients with DOR, adjusting the trigger time to a smaller than normal follicle size may be advisable. This approach could potentially better mimic the natural physiology of these patients [12].
Few studies have examined relationship between follicle size and oocyte maturity in patients with DOR. Akgün and colleagues demonstrated that in order to prevent premature ovulation and optimize cycle outcomes in poor responders in POSEIDON groups 3 and 4, triggering should be done when the leading follicle reaches 16.5–17 mm [31]. Similarly, we indicated that follicles with a size of 15–17 mm had better reproductive outcomes.
Conversely, Tian and colleagues reported that the rate of fertilization was dramatically higher in follicles sized 16–17 mm compared to those sized 12–15 mm or ≥ 18 mm. However, other indices, such as the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of good-quality embryos, showed no significant variation between groups [6]. In the current study, rate of fertilization in follicles with a size of 15–17 mm was significantly higher than other groups. Lawrenz et al. found that the probability of oocyte retrieval was comparable between follicles larger and smaller than 15 mm. However, the highest maturation rates were observed in the 13–17 mm range, with a decrease in maturation rates at both extremes of follicle size [12]. Another study showed that among patients older than 35 years of age, there was a positive effect on the mature oocyte rate and fertilization rate in medium group (16–18 mm) [18]. Our data suggest that oocytes tend to mature earlier in women with DOR, resulting in accelerated follicular growth. This suggests that a follicle size of 15 to 17 mm, rather than 18 mm, may be the optimum size for triggering ovulation. Although the ROC analysis identified an optimal cut-off of 14.5–15.5 mm for predicting COC retrieval, our results showed that follicles measuring 15–17 mm yielded significantly higher rate of mature oocyte (MII), fertilization, and high-quality embryo formation. These findings suggest that while follicles in a size of 14.5 mm can be successfully retrieved, the likelihood of obtaining a mature and developmentally competent oocyte is highest in the 15–17 mm range.
Our findings indicated that in DOR patients, the optimal follicle size for triggering oocyte maturation and supporting embryo development consistently falls within the 15–17 mm range, regardless of chronological age. We found no significant differences in clinical outcomes within this follicle size range in comparison between POSEIDON group 3 (< 35 years) and group 4 (≥ 35 years). Rates of oocyte competence, including COC retrieval and MII maturation, along with fertilization (2PN) and TQE formation, were remarkably similar across both age groups. These findings suggest that, in the context of low ovarian reserve, the biological behavior of follicles, characterized by accelerated granulosa cell maturation and earlier LH receptor expression, may play a more decisive role than age alone in determining follicular readiness for ovulation. Therefore, in DOR patients, relying solely on chronological age to guide the timing of final oocyte maturation may be inadequate. Instead, individualized monitoring of follicular development offers a more precise and effective approach to optimize clinical outcomes.
One important limitation of the current study was that follicular size was recorded on the day of OPU, rather than at the time of trigger. However, based on retrospective chart reviews, we observed that follicular diameter typically increased by approximately 1 to 1.5 mm between the trigger and OPU.
The most favorable outcomes, particularly regarding mature oocyte yield, were seen in follicles 15–17 mm on the day of retrieval. This showed that the size of follicles was likely around 13.5–15.5 mm at the time of trigger. As such, the findings imply that optimal trigger timing in women with DOR may need to occur earlier than current standards suggest. Nonetheless, given the relatively small sample size in this study, we cannot definitively conclude that the ideal trigger size is 13.5–15.5 mm. Larger and prospective researches are needed to validate this hypothesis and refine trigger protocols for this population. Our interpretation is further supported by the study of Lawrenz et al. They showed that even when triggers were administered at smaller follicle sizes (≤ 15 mm), mature oocytes were still retrieved and outcomes were improved in DOR patients [12]. All in all, these results highlight the potential clinical benefit of earlier and individualized trigger strategies, especially in poor responders, and are in line with our observations when accounting for the expected follicular growth between trigger and retrieval.
Premature ovulation remains a key concern in patients with DOR. In the current study, 13.27% of patients experienced premature ovulation, characterized by significantly higher basal FSH, lower AMH, and elevated LH and progesterone on trigger day. Also, the mean follicular size in these patients was 18.6 mm on trigger day. This result was consistent with results of Akgün et al., who reported that patients with premature ovulation had significantly larger leading follicles, averaging 19.8 ± 2.4 mm on trigger day and the mean serum progesterone and LH levels on the day of hCG trigger were significantly higher in the premature ovulation group compared to control subjects [31]. Similarly, Lawrenz et al. demonstrated that triggering ovulation at smaller follicular sizes (≤ 15 mm) was associated with significantly lower rates of premature ovulation and higher oocyte retrieval (OPU) rates, compared to triggering at sizes >15 mm [12].
In a normal ovarian cycle, granulosa cells within developing follicles initially express only the FSH receptor. The expression of the LH receptor typically occurs much later, in a tightly regulated manner, and is confined to preovulatory follicles under the synergistic influence of FSH and estrogen. This precise timing is crucial for preparing the follicle to respond to the mid-cycle LH surge and initiate ovulation [28]. In patients with DOR, this physiological sequence is disrupted. DOR is characterized by a compensatory rise in basal FSH. Since one of the established roles of FSH is to induce LH receptor expression in granulosa cells, the elevated FSH exposure in DOR delivers a disproportionately strong signal, leading to the premature expression of LH receptor. Consequently, follicles enter a luteinized state at a smaller diameter, leading to premature progesterone rise and an increased risk of ovulation before or shortly after the scheduled trigger [30]. Concurrently, low AMH reduces the inhibition on follicular maturation, exacerbating this accelerated development [28]. This altered follicular physiology necessitates a paradigm shift in trigger timing in DOR patients. Therefore, considering earlier trigger at slightly smaller follicle sizes may improve outcomes and reduce premature ovulation and cycle cancellations in these patients.
One of the major challenges in DOR patients is low antral follicle count, which results in fewer retrieved oocytes and lower pregnancy rates compared to normal responders [32]. For these patients, maximizing of the number of oocytes retrieved is critical. In standard clinical IVF practice, follicles >13–14 mm are usually aspirated during ovum pickup, while follicles smaller than 12 mm are often ignored [3]. However, some studies have suggested that follicles 12 mm in size may yield mature oocytes and TQE suitable for transfer, which help aspirate of follicles larger than 12 mm in DOR patients [12, 33]. On the contrary, Yagüe-Serrano et al. showed that follicles in size of 11.5 mm was able to produce mature oocytes, but only those that were larger than 13.5 mm produced transferable embryos [3]. Similarly, in our study, we observed that follicles 11 and 12 mm produced mature (MII) oocytes, but none of the oocytes retrieved from follicles smaller than 13 mm resulted in successful fertilization or TQE. This finding suggests that although these oocytes have achieved nuclear competence, nuclear maturation alone is not sufficient to improve IVF outcomes [34]. It has been established that both nuclear maturation and cytoplasmic maturation are prerequisites for full oocyte competence [35]. The absence of developmental potential in these mature oocytes, as seen in our study, suggests that they lack cytoplasmic competence. As a result, these oocytes are unable to undergo chromosomal rearrangements, epigenetic modifications, fertilization, and subsequent embryonic development [36]. Based on these findings, the lower rate of oocytes fertilization obtained from follicles ≤ 12 mm in size may be explained by nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation disrupted [37]. Therefore, for mature oocytes obtained from follicles ≤ 12 mm in size, IVM protocols aimed at improving oocyte quality and competence may be appropriate [38]. Our finding suggests that to optimize reproductive success in patients with DOR, all developed ovarian follicles should be punctured.
The novelty of this study was the separate incubation of the collected oocytes and the labeling of the MII oocytes,2PN and TQE based on follicle of origin. This methodological approach allowed the assessment of oocyte fertilization potential and embryo quality according to follicle size. Limitations of the current study were the small sample size, measurement of follicles size on day of OPU, and also the lack of information on pregnancy outcomes due to the short duration of the study.
Further investigation is needed to determine the most effective trigger strategy for women with DOR. In poor responders who do not meet standard criteria for ovulation induction, these findings may help guide clinical decision making and avoid cycle cancellation. In addition, to provide evidence that can inform guidelines and enable more personalized care for these patients, studies focused on low-responder populations are essential.
Conclusion
Our study suggested that in women with DOR, triggering oocyte maturation when follicles measure 15–17 mm leads to the best outcomes in terms of oocyte yield, maturity, fertilization, and embryo quality. These findings were consistent across both younger and older DOR patients, indicating that age alone is not a reliable guide for trigger timing. Instead, the altered follicular physiology in DOR groups such as early LH receptor expression may require earlier trigger decisions. Notably, follicle measurements were taken on the day of oocyte retrieval, and retrospective data suggest a growth of 1–1.5 mm between trigger and retrieval. Thus, optimal trigger size may actually be closer to 13.5–15.5 mm. Given the study’s limitations, including sample size and timing of measurements, larger prospective studies are needed. Still, these results support more individualized and earlier trigger strategies in women with DOR. We propose a hypothesis to be tested in a prospective trial, comparison of trigger at lead follicle of 17 mm versus 15 mm.
Acknowledgements
The authors are deeply grateful to all the patients who participated in this study. The authors are also grateful to the directors and staff of the participating hospitals for their valuable assistance.
Abbreviations
- DOR
Diminished ovarian reserve
- ART
Assisted reproductive technology
- IVF
In vitro fertilization
- ICSI
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
- ESHRE
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
- POSEIDON
Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number
- AFC
Antral follicular count
- AMH
Anti-mullerian hormone
- OPU
Ovum pickup
- COC
Cumulus oocyte complex
- MII
Metaphase II
- 2PN
Two pronuclei
- TQE
Top-quality embryo
- BMI
Body mass index
- FSH
Follicle stimulating hormone
- LH
Luteinizing hormone
- P
Progesterone
- E2
Estradiol
- HCG
Human chorionic gonadotropin
- HMG
Human menopausal gonadotropin
- AUC
Area under the curve
Authors’ contributions
*Elham Naghshineh: * Validation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - Original Draft. *Hatav Ghasemi Tehrani: * Data curation, Methodology, Software. *Ferdous Mehrabian: * Software, Visualization, Investigation. *Farahnaz Mardanian: * Software, Writing - Original Draft. *Marzieh Rezaei: * Supervision, Validation, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.
Funding
Not applicable.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study could become available through the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran under the ethics code of IR.MUI.REC.1403.043. In addition, all subjects signed an informed consent form to participate in the study and a consent form for publication.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Liang C, Zhang X, Qi C, Hu H, Zhang Q, Zhu X, et al. UHPLC-MS-MS analysis of oxylipins metabolomics components of follicular fluid in infertile individuals with diminished ovarian reserve. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19(1):143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cohen J, Chabbert-Buffet N, Darai E. Diminished ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, poor ovarian responder—a plea for universal definitions. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(12):1709–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yagüe-Serrano R, Palomar A, Quiñonero A, Gómez VH, de Los Santos MJ, Vidal C, et al. Oocyte competence, embryological outcomes and miRNA signature of different sized follicles from poor responder patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(19):10237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wirleitner B, Okhowat J, Vištejnová L, Králíčková M, Karlíková M, Vanderzwalmen P, et al. Relationship between follicular volume and oocyte competence, blastocyst development and live-birth rate: optimal follicle size for oocyte retrieval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):118–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gan R, Huang X, Zhao J, Zhang Q, Huang C, Li Y. Time interval between hCG administration and oocyte retrieval and ART outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21(1):61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tian T, Li Y, Lv J, Chen L, Wang Y, Yang R, et al. The potential influence of follicle diameter on natural cycle in vitro fertilization among women with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2023;16(1):195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Taylor HS, Pal L, Sell E. Speroff’s clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stimulation EGGO, Bosch E, Broer S, Griesinger G, Grynberg M, Grynberg M, et al. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod Open. 2025;202(2):hoaa009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Santoro N, Isaac B, Neal-Perry G, Adel T, Weingart L, Nussbaum A, et al. Impaired folliculogenesis and ovulation in older reproductive aged women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5502–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vuong LN. Alteration of final maturation and laboratory techniques in low responders. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(4):675–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maghraby H, Saleh H, Fourtia IL, Rasheed S, Elmahdy M, Abdelbadie AS, et al. The dilemma of the trigger timing in IVF: a review. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2024;29(1):8. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lawrenz B, Kalafat E, Ata B, Melado L, Del Gallego R, Elkhatib I, et al. Do women with severely diminished ovarian reserve undergoing modified natural-cycle in‐vitro fertilization benefit from earlier trigger at smaller follicle size? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;64(2):245–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1452–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Fischer R, Conforti A, Dahan MH, Marca AL, et al. Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024;22(1):122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bartolacci A, Marzanati D, Barbagallo BM, Solano Narduche L, D’Alessandro G, Esposito S, et al. To assess or not to assess: reconsidering day 3 embryo quality in planned freeze-all blastocyst cycles. J Pers Med. 2024;14(6):624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cai J, Liu L, Chen J, Liu Z, Jiang X, Chen H, et al. Day-3-embryo fragmentation is associated with singleton birth weight following fresh single blastocyst transfer: a retrospective study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:919283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Clewes J, Joergner I, Bonaki SD, et al. Automated follicle tracking improves measurement reliability in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(5):658–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang J, Gao J, Wang Y, Liu H, Lian X. Impact of follicular size categories on oocyte quality at trigger day in young and advanced-age patients undergoing GnRH-ant therapy. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1167395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Morley L, Tang T, Yasmin E, Hamzeh R, Rutherford A, Balen A. Timing of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone administration in IVF protocols using GnRH antagonists: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Fertil. 2012;15(3):134–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mehri S, Levi Setti P, Greco K, Sakkas D, Martinez G, Patrizio P. Correlation between follicular diameters and flushing versus no flushing on oocyte maturity, fertilization rate and embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(1):73–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rosen MP, Shen S, Dobson AT, Rinaudo PF, McCulloch CE, Cedars MI. A quantitative assessment of follicle size on oocyte developmental competence. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(3):684–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mohr-Sasson A, Orvieto R, Blumenfeld S, Axelrod M, Mor-Hadar D, Grin L, et al. The association between follicle size and oocyte development as a function of final follicular maturation triggering. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(6):887–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shapiro BS, Rasouli MA, Verma K, Raman A, Garner FC, Aguirre M, et al. The effect of ovarian follicle size on oocyte and embryology outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(6):1170–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nogueira D, Friedler S, Schachter M, Raziel A, Ron-El R, Smitz J. Oocyte maturity and preimplantation development in relation to follicle diameter in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist treatments. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):578–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kolibianakis EM, Albano C, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Prolongation of the follicular phase in in vitro fertilization results in a lower ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(1):102–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Tarlatzis BC, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Is earlier administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated with the probability of pregnancy in cycles stimulated with Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists? A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1112–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Inaudi P, Barra V, Vellucci FL, Regini C, Luisi S. GnRH antagonist does not prevent premature luteinization and ovulation in stimulated cycles with gonadotropins for IVF: two case reports. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(3):189–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):370–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Harris BS, Steiner AZ, Jukic AM. Ovarian reserve biomarkers and menstrual cycle length in a prospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metabolism. 2021;106(9):e3748–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.La Marca A, Longo M, Sighinolfi G, Grisendi V, Imbrogno MG, Giulini S. New insights into the role of LH in early ovarian follicular growth: a possible tool to optimize follicular recruitment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;47(6):103369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Akgün N, Şükür YE, Aslan B, Kaplan NB, Acun OA, Özmen B et al. Optimal leading follicle size for final oocyte maturation in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 poor responders undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles. Authorea Preprints. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi N, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(3):155–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ectors F, Vanderzwalmen P, Van Hoeck J, Nijs M, Verhaegen G, Delvigne A, et al. Relationship of human follicular diameter with oocyte fertilization and development after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(9):2002–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sanchez F, Le AH, Ho VN, Romero S, Van Ranst H, De Vos M, et al. Biphasic in vitro maturation (CAPA-IVM) specifically improves the developmental capacity of oocytes from small antral follicles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(10):2135–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Conti M, Franciosi F. Acquisition of oocyte competence to develop as an embryo: integrated nuclear and cytoplasmic events. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(3):245–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cadenas J, la Cour Poulsen L, Mamsen LS, Andersen CY. Future potential of in vitro maturation including fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(4):550–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Triwitayakorn A, Suwajanakorn S, Pruksananonda K, Sereepapong W, Ahnonkitpanit V. Correlation between human follicular diameter and oocyte outcomes in an ICSI program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(4):143–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Urrutia AG, Cuevas MM, Giner AM, Carmona JM, Insua MF, Pellicer A, et al. Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) in vitro supplementation improves deficiencies in nuclear and cytoplasmic competence of germinal vesicle oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(4):e145–6. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study could become available through the corresponding author on reasonable request.

