No.	Reference No.	Brief Description	Reason for Exclusion
1	Brady 2014 [44], Brady 2015 [45]	Two proceedings reporting identical content; [44] retained temporarily. Later matched to Cassidy et al., 2015 [29] with nearly identical authors and study population but different outcome; insufficient data in proceeding to extract effect estimates.	Duplicate content; insufficient data
2	Kosaka 2011 [46], Kosaka 2012 [32]	Two proceedings with identical content; [47] retained temporarily. Subsequently published as [32] by overlapping authors with similar population and outcomes.	Duplicate content; subsequent peer-reviewed publication
3	Cassidy 2012 [48]	Compared an intervention outside the scope of the review.	Irrelevant intervention