Skip to main content
Drugs in Context logoLink to Drugs in Context
. 2025 Nov 20;14:2025-8-4. doi: 10.7573/dic.2025-8-4

Biologics and small molecules for psoriasis: current and future progress

Luca Potestio 1,#, Nello Tommasino 1,#, Michela D’Agostino 1,#, Valeria Esposito 1,#, Giuseppe Lauletta 1,#, Antonio Portarapillo 1,#, Matteo Megna 1,✉,#
PMCID: PMC12657003  PMID: 41312187

Abstract

Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis have led to the development of biologic therapies that target key components of the immune system involved in the inflammatory cascade of psoriasis, revolutionizing the management of moderate-to-severe cases. Alongside biologics, small molecules have emerged as promising treatment options. However, despite significant progress, several challenges remain. Additionally, long-term safety data for many newer agents are still lacking, necessitating ongoing surveillance and real-world evidence collection. This narrative review, performed by analysing the existing medical literature using PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to 30 June 2025, explores new systemic therapies for psoriasis, including both approved and emerging biologics and small molecules, highlighting future directions in treatment. Despite advancements in psoriasis treatment, unmet needs persist, including specific clinical phenotypes such as pustular psoriasis, paradoxical reactions, patient comorbidities, treatment resistance or inefficacy, and high costs, underscoring the need for novel and emerging therapies. In the future, advances in pharmacogenetics and artificial intelligence could revolutionize psoriasis management. Artificial intelligence-driven models integrating clinical data, laboratory findings and biomarkers could enhance precision medicine by optimizing treatment selection and establishing standardized therapeutic algorithms, ensuring that patients receive the right drug at the right time.

Keywords: biologics, emerging therapies, psoriasis, small molecules, treatment


PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY .

What is psoriasis?

Psoriasis is a common, chronic skin disease that significantly affects the quality of life of those who have it due to red, scaly patches on the skin and associated health issues like psoriatic arthritis and heart disease. While the exact cause isn’t known, the IL-17–IL-23 axis – a pathway that drives chronic inflammation – is central to the disease.

Traditional treatments like topical creams, light therapy and older systemic drugs (for example, methotrexate) can be limited by effectiveness, tolerability and safety concerns. This has led to newer treatments with advanced systemic therapies, called biologics and small molecules.

Biologic therapies

Biologics are targeted treatments that inhibit specific parts of the immune system’s inflammatory response such as pro-inflammatory proteins (cytokines). They are a major advance for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

TNF inhibitors (targeting tumour necrosis factor)

This was the first class of biologics. They are effective and have a favourable long-term safety profile:

  • Etanercept: Approved in 2004, it works well and maintains responses over years. Real-world studies confirm its long-term safety.

  • Infliximab: Administered intravenously, it offers a rapid and high response rate, though some patients may develop resistance over time.

  • Adalimumab: A fully human antibody, it provides rapid and sustained skin clearance and has an extensively studied, robust safety record over many years.

  • Certolizumab pegol: Unique for its minimal transfer across the placenta, making it suitable during pregnancy and breastfeeding. It has demonstrated strong efficacy in trials.

IL-17 inhibitors (targeting IL-17)

These agents offer very high rates of skin clearance and rapid onset of action:

  • Secukinumab: The first in its class, it provides durable, long-term responses and is effective on difficult areas like the nails and scalp.

  • Ixekizumab: Shows rapid and significant clearance, often superior to older biologics and effective for difficult-to-treat areas.

  • Brodalumab: Works by blocking the IL-17 receptor, providing very rapid and profound skin clearance.

  • Bimekizumab: The newest, it blocks both IL-17A and IL-17F, demonstrating superior efficacy to other biologics in head-to-head trials, with high rates of complete skin clearance.

IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors

These target the upstream drivers of the inflammatory axis:

  • Ustekinumab: Targets both IL-12 and IL-23. It is effective and has a convenient dosing schedule (every 12 weeks) and good long-term durability.

  • Guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab: These newer agents specifically target only IL-23. They have demonstrated superior efficacy and sustained, long-term responses in clinical trials and real-world data, with risankizumab, in particular, showing excellent long-term maintenance of clearance.

Small molecules

These are orally administered drugs that target different inflammatory pathways:

  • Apremilast: A PDE4 inhibitor that is a good option for patients who prefer an oral medication and has a generally mild safety profile.

  • Deucravacitinib: A TYK2 inhibitor that offers high efficacy comparable to biologics, representing a significant step forward in oral treatment options.

Challenges and future directions

While these advanced therapies have transformed psoriasis care, challenges remain, including treatment non-response, potential side effects, the development of immunity against the drug and high costs.

This review emphasizes that the current treatment landscape for psoriasis offers a diverse and highly effective range of options, particularly with the newer anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 biologics and small molecules, ensuring that most people with moderate-to-severe psoriasis can achieve and maintain clear skin.

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder that affects approximately up to 3% of the population worldwide.1,2 The most common form, plaque psoriasis, is characterized by erythematous-desquamative plaques typically involving the scalp, elbows, knees and lower back.35 The disease significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) and is associated with multiple comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), cardiovascular disease and depression.69 Whilst its exact aetiology is still not understood, genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers seem to play a crucial role.10,11

The IL-17–IL-23 axis seems to play a central role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis by driving chronic inflammation and keratinocyte hyperproliferation.12 Traditional treatments follow a stepwise approach, including topical agents, phototherapy and conventional systemic agents (e.g. methotrexate, cyclosporine and acitretin).13,14 However, these systemic therapies may have limitations in terms of efficacy, tolerability and long-term safety, necessitating the development of more targeted and effective therapeutic options. Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis have led to the emergence of biologic therapies targeting key components of the immune system involved in the inflammatory cascade of psoriasis, which have revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.13,14 These therapies primarily inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF), IL-12–IL-23, IL-17 and IL-23.15,16 Biologics, particularly the latest approved ones (anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23), have significantly improved treatment outcomes, offering higher efficacy, durable responses and a favourable safety profile compared to conventional systemic therapies.15,16

In addition to biologics, small molecules, such as phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor (apremilast) and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor (deucravacitinib), have emerged as promising treatment options for psoriasis.15,16 Despite these advances, challenges remain: primary/secondary inefficacy, immunogenicity, paradoxical reactions, high costs and safety concerns still need to be addressed.1721 This review summarizes current and emerging systemic therapies for psoriasis, biologics and small molecules, with a focus on efficacy, safety and future perspectives.

Methods

A narrative review of the current literature was performed by analysing the existing medical literature using PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to June 30, 2025. This review focuses on available data about both currently approved and emerging advanced systemic drugs for psoriasis. The search strategy incorporated specific research terms such as “psoriasis treatments”, “guidelines”, “biologics, “small molecules”, “anti-TNF”, “anti-IL-12/23”, “anti-IL-23”, “anti-IL-17”, “clinical trial” and “real-life experiences”. The search included all fields (title, abstract, keywords and full text). Moreover, references were examined to capture any potentially overlooked manuscripts. Herein, the main results from clinical trials evaluating the investigated drugs for psoriasis management were discussed. Regarding real-world evidence, only data from the most relevant studies, selected based on the number of patients and data accuracy, were included. Non-English language manuscripts were excluded from the analysis. It is important to note that the information presented in this article is based on data from previously conducted studies. Lastly, studies were selected based on clinical relevance and quality of data, irrespective of national origin. As a result, several references from Italian author groups were included, particularly when reporting large real-life cohorts or offering insights not covered by international trials.

This review is structured into two parts: the first part focuses on anti TNF and anti-IL-17 agents, whilst the second part covers anti-IL-23 drugs, small molecules and future directions.

Review

TNF inhibitors

Etanercept

Etanercept was the first biologic approved by the FDA for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in 2004. It is a fusion protein combining the TNF receptor with the Fc fragment of IgG1, which binds soluble and transmembrane TNF as well as lymphotoxin-α.22 The recommended adult dose is 50 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for 12 weeks, followed by once weekly; in children aged ≥6 years, dosing is 0.8 mg/kg weekly (maximum 50 mg).23

Its efficacy has been demonstrated in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eight trials consistently showed superiority of both high-dose (50 mg twice weekly) and low-dose regimens (50 mg weekly or 25 mg twice weekly) over placebo, with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response rates ranging from 40% to 59% and 30% to 45%, respectively.24 Etanercept was also superior to acitretin.24 In a post hoc analysis of 506 patients, responses were maintained up to 4 years.25

Real-life data further support etanercept effectiveness. In a 36-month multicentre study of 926 patients, both continuous and intermittent regimens improved efficacy and QoL by week 12; in the intermittent group, the mean drug-free interval was 12.9±12.8 weeks and retreatment restored responses.26 The large phase IV OBSERVE-5 registry (2510 patients) confirmed long-term efficacy and safety: 22.2% experienced serious adverse events (SAEs), most commonly coronary artery disease (0.6%), osteoarthritis (0.6%), myocardial infarction (0.7%), cellulitis (0.9%) and pneumonia (1.2%). Fifty-five deaths were reported, with four considered potentially related to treatment. Malignancies occurred in 4.9% of patients, including non-melanoma skin cancer in 2.6%; lymphoma and tuberculosis were each reported in 0.1%.27

Regarding safety, long-term data confirm a favourable profile. In a post hoc analysis of 108 patients treated for 48 months, no cumulative toxicity was observed, and the rates of cardiovascular events, infections or malignancies did not increase over time.25 The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Serious infections were rare, with only nine cases reported, including appendiceal abscess and septic shock.25 Importantly, no reactivation of latent tuberculosis or opportunistic infections was observed. Across studies, the incidence of infections, malignancies and lymphoma was comparable to that expected with traditional systemic therapies such as methotrexate or cyclosporine.27

Infliximab

Infliximab is a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting soluble and transmembrane TNF, approved in 2006 for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. It is administered intravenously at 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6, then every 6–8 weeks.28 Its efficacy was demonstrated in three pivotal RCTs, with rapid onset: PASI75 was achieved in 79% of patients by week 10, and responses were maintained at 6 and 12 months in 74% and 53%, respectively. Secondary loss of efficacy occurred in ~19%, associated with antidrug antibodies.2931 In a phase III trial of 835 patients, continuous therapy was superior to intermittent dosing, with PASI75 at week 50 of 44% (3 mg/kg) and 55% (5 mg/kg) in the continuous groups versus 25% and 38% with intermittent regimens.31 Real-world evidence confirmed these findings. In the REALITY study (660 patients), 56.8% achieved PASI75 by week 50, and amongst early responders, 64.7% maintained PASI75 at week 50 and 66.3% at week 98. Patients naive to biologic therapy showed better outcomes than those previously treated.32 In a retrospective series of 63 treatment courses, combination therapy prolonged drug survival, whereas obesity and infusion reactions predicted discontinuation; PASI75 responses at 24 and 52 weeks were consistent with RCTs, though 59% discontinued after a median of 12 months for loss of efficacy.33 Regarding safety, pooled RCT data showed no cumulative toxicity after 12 months. Reported AEs included elevated liver enzymes (3–5%), lupus-like syndrome (2 cases) and infusion reactions (5 severe, 4 hypersensitivities within 14 days). Two cases of active tuberculosis were observed, highlighting the need for screening.31,34,35 The REALITY study confirmed tolerability over 2 years: infusion reactions occurred in 7.7%, serious infections in 2.3% (including three tuberculosis and two cellulitis), whilst lymphoproliferative disorders and malignancies were seen in 0.6%. Discontinuations for AEs occurred in 13.7% of patients. Most events, such as nasopharyngitis, URTIs, headaches or joint pain, were mild. No cases of demyelinating disorders or worsening heart failure were reported.32 The pattern of AEs aligned with previous data, confirming that long-term infliximab treatment for plaque psoriasis is well tolerated.36

Adalimumab

Adalimumab is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds soluble and membrane-bound TNF that was approved for plaque psoriasis in 2008 (FDA, later EMA).37 The standard dosing is 80 mg s.c. initially, followed by 40 mg at week 1 and then every other week for adults, whereas in children aged ≥4 years, it is 0.8 mg/kg (max 40 mg) weekly for two doses, then every other week.37 Its efficacy was first established in pivotal RCTs.3849 In the REVEAL study, PASI75 was achieved as early as week 4 and maintained with continued treatment; patients achieving PASI75 at week 16 showed a 92% improvement from baseline, sustained at 89% by week 33. Long-term extension confirmed maintenance of PASI75/90/100 over 3 years, with responses regained after retreatment.38,4548 The CHAMPION trial demonstrated superiority over methotrexate, with higher PASI75 and PASI90 rates independent of BMI.39,42 Health-related QoL also improved significantly, as shown by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SF-36 scores.43,44 The BELIEVE study tested adalimumab with or without topical calcipotriol/betamethasone; whilst topicals accelerated early response, by week 16, PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 were not superior to adalimumab monotherapy.49 Real-world data confirmed these findings. A single-centre retrospective study of 316 patients followed for 9 years showed rapid and sustained PASI responses even in older or biologic-experienced patients or those with obesity, consistent with trial data.50 Long-term safety was extensively assessed in REVEAL and its extension: the AE rate was 3.99 per patient-year, with SAEs at 0.06 per patient-year, and no increased risk of serious infections, malignancies, demyelinating disorders, lupus-like syndrome or lymphoma.38,45 The ESPRIT registry, a 10-year observational study including 6014 patients with 28,161 person-years of exposure, provided robust safety data. Serious infections occurred at 1.0/100 person-years, within the expected range for patients with psoriasis not on biologics (0.3–2.1). Malignancy incidence was 1.3/100 person-years, comparable to published rates (0.5–2.0).51 Cardiovascular events were rare, with acute myocardial infarction at 0.1/100 person-years and stroke at 0.2/100 person-years, both lower than general psoriasis populations.51 Importantly, >95% of patients remained free of serious infection or malignancy after 10 years. Injection-site reactions were uncommon (0.2/100 person-years), whilst tuberculosis, oral candidiasis, lupus-like reactions and demyelinating disorders each occurred at <0.1/100 person-years.51 Mortality was also lower than expected: only 60 deaths occurred versus 144 predicted, corresponding to a standardized mortality ratio 58% below that of the matched general population.51,52

Certolizumab pegol

Certolizumab pegol is a PEGylated Fab fragment of a humanized IgG4 antibody that binds soluble and transmembrane TNF. Unlike other TNF inhibitors, it lacks an Fc portion, resulting in minimal placental and breastmilk transfer, which makes it particularly suitable in pregnancy and breastfeeding.5356 It was approved in Europe in 2020 for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, administered s.c. at 400 mg at weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 200 mg every other week or 400 mg every 4 weeks; escalation to 400 mg biweekly may be considered in non-responders.53,54 Efficacy was demonstrated in pivotal trials. In CIMPASI-1/2 and CIMPACT, both 200 mg and 400 mg biweekly achieved significantly higher PASI75 and Physician’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (PGA 0/1) responses versus placebo at week 16, with PASI90 and QoL improvements maintained up to 3 years.5560 In CIMPACT, certolizumab 400 mg biweekly was superior to etanercept for PASI75 at week 12, whilst 200 mg biweekly was non-inferior.55

Real-world effectiveness has been confirmed in the CIMREAL study, a large prospective non-interventional trial including 399 patients across Europe and Canada.61 After 12 months, PASI75 and PASI90 were achieved by 77% and 56.5% of patients, respectively, whilst PASI ≤3 and ≤2 increased from 49.8% and 41.1% at 3 months to 82.0% and 75.3% at 12 months. QoL improved substantially, with mean DLQI decreasing from 12.4 to 2.3 and DLQI 0/1 rising from 28.6% to 59.4%. Treatment persistence at 1 year was ~85%. In an Italian real-life cohort (n=153), certolizumab significantly reduced PASI and improved nail and joint symptoms as early as week 12, with sustained benefits up to week 52.62

Safety across trials and real-world studies was favourable. In CIMPASI/CIMPACT, infections, injection-site reactions and skin disorders were the most frequent AEs, mostly mild; SAEs occurred in 3.5% of certolizumab patients versus 3.7% on placebo, with discontinuation rates of ~1.5%.55,57 Long-term pooled data up to 144 weeks showed an SAE incidence of 7.5/100 patient-years without cumulative risk; malignancies were rare (1.4%), serious cardiovascular events occurred at 0.4/100 patient-years, and tuberculosis was reported in one case.63 Oral candidiasis, lupus-like reactions or demyelinating disorders were very uncommon; two cases of multiple sclerosis were reported amongst nearly 1000 patient-years of exposure.63

Anti-IL-17

Secukinumab

Secukinumab is a fully human IgG1/κ monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes IL-17A. Approved in 2015, it was the first IL-17A inhibitor indicated for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults, adolescents and children aged ≥6 years.6471 It is given s.c. at 300 mg in adults, or weight-based dosing in children, with induction at weeks 0–4 followed by monthly maintenance.71 In patients ≥90 kg, biweekly dosing may be more effective.72

Its efficacy was demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials. In ERASURE (n=738) and FIXTURE (n=1306), secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg achieved significantly higher PASI75 and PASI90 responses versus placebo and etanercept.72,73 In FIXTURE, superiority over etanercept was sustained up to 52 weeks.73 Long-term efficacy was confirmed in the SCULPTURE extension: PASI75/90/100 responses at year 1 (88.9%, 68.5%, 43.8%) were maintained through year 5 (88.5%, 66.4%, 41%), with mean PASI improvement of ~90% and DLQI 0/1 in 65.5%.74 In the CLEAR study, secukinumab was superior to ustekinumab at week 16 for PASI90 and PASI100.67,70 Secukinumab also proved effective in psoriatic arthritis and difficult-to-treat sites such as nails, scalp, palms and soles.7578

Real-world studies confirmed its effectiveness and safety.7983 Responses appear higher in bio-naive patients79,80 but secukinumab is also effective in patients previously exposed to anti TNF therapy or in those in whom it failed.84,85 Registry and observational data support its use in older patients86 and in those with prior malignancy.87

The safety profile is favourable and consistent with trials. Common AEs include nasopharyngitis, URTIs, headache, diarrhoea and arthralgia.73,88 Oral candidiasis occurs but less frequently than with brodalumab or bimekizumab.89 Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been reported but appears uncommon; a pooled analyses of >3900 patients found no causal link.90,91 Rare events include eczematous eruptions, vasculitis and lupus-like reactions.88 Long-term data up to 5 years confirmed no unexpected safety signals and stable rates of infections, malignancies and cardiovascular events.88,92

Ixekizumab

Ixekizumab is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A, blocking its binding to the receptor and downstream keratinocyte activation.9395 It is approved for adults, adolescents and children aged ≥6 years (≥25 kg) with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.9396 The recommended adult dose is 160 mg s.c. at week 0, followed by 80 mg at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12, then 80 mg every 4 weeks.93,94 Pivotal phase III trials (UNCOVER-1/2/3) demonstrated rapid and significant responses: at week 12, PASI75 was achieved in 88.7% (every 2 weeks) and 81.6% (every 4 weeks) versus 4.4% placebo, whilst static PGA (sPGA) 0/1 was reached in 81.8%, 75.0% and 3.9%, respectively.97,98 Ixekizumab also achieved higher PASI90/100 rates than placebo and outperformed etanercept at week 12.97,98 Long-term extensions confirmed sustained efficacy and safety over 5 years.99101 In paediatrics, IXORA-PEDS confirmed durable efficacy and safety up to 108 weeks.101,102

Head-to-head trials have positioned ixekizumab amongst the most effective IL-17 inhibitors. IXORA-R showed faster onset and superior clearance at week 12 versus guselkumab,103 whilst IXORA-S demonstrated greater skin and nail efficacy versus ustekinumab at 1 year.104 Ixekizumab is particularly effective on difficult-to-treat sites such as nails, scalp and palmoplantar psoriasis.105109 Case reports suggest lower relapse rates than secukinumab in erythrodermic psoriasis.110113 Real-world data corroborate trial findings. In a multicentre study of 638 patients, ixekizumab outperformed secukinumab in PASI100, PASI<3 and PASI90 at weeks 12, 24 and 48, with superior DLQI improvements.114117 No significant differences emerged versus brodalumab, though both agents showed high PASI90/100 responses.117,118

Safety data are consistent with the IL-17 inhibitor class. Common AEs include injection-site reactions, nasopharyngitis and mild infections; less frequent are neutropenia, fungal infections and antidrug antibody development. Rare events (<1%) include IBD onset, candidiasis and hypersensitivity reactions.93

Brodalumab

Brodalumab is a fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA), thereby blocking multiple IL-17 cytokines (IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17A/F, IL-17C, IL-17E).119121 This broad inhibition translates into a profound molecular response, with >95% suppression of psoriatic gene expression after 12 weeks.121 It is FDA-approved for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis unresponsive to other systemic therapies, at 210 mg s.c. at weeks 0, 1 and 2, then every 2 weeks.121,122

The AMAGINE-1/2/3 phase III trials established its high efficacy, with PASI75 achieved in up to 86% versus 8% with placebo (p<0.001) and rapid onset of complete or near-complete clearance.121,123125 Benefits were sustained up to 120 weeks.124 Brodalumab was also effective in scalp126 and nail psoriasis;127 in the AMVISION-1/2 trials, it improved both skin and joint outcomes in psoriatic arthritis.128,129 In a Japanese phase III trial, it was beneficial in generalized pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis, with most patients achieving remission or improvement at week 52.130

Real-life studies further confirmed its effectiveness and safety across diverse populations.131135 Brodalumab showed high rates of rapid PASI90/100 responses, including in difficult-to-treat sites, and maintained favourable drug survival.

The safety profile is consistent with IL-17 blockade: the most common AEs are nasopharyngitis, URTIs, Candida infections, headache and arthralgia.121,122 Transient neutropenia was observed without severe infections. Although cases of suicide were reported during trials, no causal link was demonstrated; nonetheless, caution is advised in patients with depression or suicidal ideation.120 Unlike other IL-17 inhibitors, brodalumab has not shown a clear signal for IBD flares but vigilance remains warranted.

Bimekizumab

Bimekizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody neutralizing both IL-17A and IL-17F, approved in June 2023 for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The recommended dose is 320 mg (two s.c. injections of 160 mg) at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16, followed by every 8 weeks; in patients ≥120 kg with suboptimal response, maintenance every 4 weeks may be considered.136138 Dual IL-17A/F blockade provides stronger suppression of inflammatory pathways than IL-17A inhibition alone.139

In BE ABLE 1, bimekizumab achieved a dose-dependent PASI90 response at week 12, significantly higher than placebo.140 BE ABLE 2 confirmed long-term efficacy through week 60, with serious treatment-emergent AEs in 6.9%.141 In the phase III BE READY trial, PASI90 and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 were reached at week 16 by 91.0% and 93.0% of patients, compared to 1.0% with placebo (p<0.0001 for both); PASI100 was achieved in 68.0%.142

Head-to-head studies demonstrated superiority of bimekizumab over other biologics. In BE VIVID, PASI90 and IGA 0/1 at week 16 were achieved by 85.0% and 84.0% of bimekizumab-treated patients versus 50.0% and 53.0% with ustekinumab and 5.0% and 5.0% with placebo (p<0.0001 for both comparisons).143 In BE RADIANT, PASI100 at week 48 was achieved in 61.7% of patients on bimekizumab versus 48.9% on secukinumab (p=0.006), with sustained responses through week 96: PASI100 was maintained in 70.8% of patients continuing bimekizumab, whilst 76.6% of those switched from secukinumab achieved PASI100.144,145 In BE SURE, PASI90 at week 16 was achieved in 86.2% of patients on bimekizumab compared with 47.2% on adalimumab (p<0.001), whilst IGA 0/1 was reached by 85.3% versus 57.2%, respectively (p<0.001).146

Pooled safety data from BE VIVID, BE READY, BE SURE and the extension BE BRIGHT identified nasopharyngitis, URTIs and oral candidiasis as the most frequent AEs. Over 3 years, candidiasis events were almost all mild or moderate (99.3%), discontinuations due to candidiasis were rare (1.5%), and incidence was lower with maintenance every 8 weeks than every 4 weeks.139,147

Real-world experiences confirm the effectiveness and tolerability of bimekizumab in the short and long term, with comparable responses and safety with respect to clinical trials, regardless of previous exposure to biologics.148150 Real-life data also suggest bimekizumab as a valuable treatment option for difficult-to-treat areas in patients with psoriasis.148153

Anti-IL12/23

Ustekinumab

Ustekinumab is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that binds the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23. Ustekinumab involves subcutaneous administration in weeks 0 and 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter, at a dose that depends on the patient’s age and weight. In adult patients, the dose is 45 mg for body weight <100 kg or 90 mg for body weight ≥100 kg. For children aged ≥12 years, the same adult schedule applies, except for those with body weight <60 kg, who receive 0.75 mg/kg.154 This drug was approved in 2009 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.155

The PHOENIX 1 and 2 phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated its efficacy and safety. In PHOENIX 1, PASI75 was achieved in 67.1% and 66.4% of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 mg and 90 mg, respectively versus 3% treated with placebo at week 12.156 PHOENIX 2 showed similar results, with PASI75 reached in 66.7% and 75.7% of patients receiving 45 mg and 90 mg, respectively, versus 3.7% with placebo.157 AEs were comparable across groups and mostly mild (PHOENIX 1: 57.6%, 51.4% and 48.2% of patients receiving 45 mg and 90 mg of the drug and placebo, respectively; PHOENIX 2: 53.1%, 47.9% and 49.8% of patients receiving 45 mg and 90 mg of the drug and placebo, respectively). SAEs were rare and occurred at rates similar to placebo. Five-year follow-up of PHOENIX 1 showed that PASI75 was reached in 63.4% (45 mg) and 72% (90 mg) of patients, and PASI90 in 39.7% and 49%, respectively; safety remained stable over time.158 In PHOENIX 2, PASI75 at week 244 was achieved in 76.5% (45 mg) and 78.6% (90 mg) of patients, and PASI90 in 50% and 55.5%, respectively.159 Regarding safety, the data were comparable between the two groups, with no reported cases of tuberculosis activation.159

Over the past decade, numerous real-world studies have confirmed the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab. An Italian 8-year study of nearly 400 patients reported PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 rates of 76.2%, 61.9% and 57.1%, respectively, highlighting the durability of response.160 Similar long-term results were reported in Turkish cohorts, with PASI ≤3 achieved in 80% of patients after 5 years, particularly amongst biologic-naive patients.161,162 Data from China provided additional insights: one study showed that responses at week 4 could be negatively influenced by metabolic comorbidities,163 whilst another demonstrated superiority of ustekinumab over TNF inhibitors at 6 months.164 Real-life experience has also confirmed its role in difficult clinical settings. Pinheiro et al. showed meaningful responses in patients who had failed TNF inhibitors, with PASI75 achieved in 67.1%.165 Damiani et al. extended these observations, reporting that ustekinumab remained effective even in patients who had failed both secukinumab and a TNF inhibitor.166 Beyond skin clearance, improvements in QoL have been consistently observed, as highlighted by Hesselvig et al., who demonstrated significant DLQI improvement, particularly during the first months of treatment.167

Anti-IL-23

Guselkumab

Guselkumab is a human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody directed against the p19 subunit of IL-23, approved in 2017 for adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis at a dose of 100 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4, followed by every 8 weeks.168 In pivotal phase III trials, including VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, guselkumab demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo and adalimumab, with PASI90 responses in 70–73% of patients at week 16 and IGA 0/1 in more than 80% of patients.169,170 Importantly, maintenance therapy preserved efficacy in the majority of responders, and patients who switched from adalimumab or ustekinumab achieved significant improvements when moved to guselkumab, as confirmed in the NAVIGATE study.171 In the head-to-head ECLIPSE trial, guselkumab was superior to secukinumab for PASI90 at week 48, with similar safety outcomes.172 Overall, clinical trials consistently confirmed both efficacy and a favourable safety profile.

Since real-world evidence has reinforced these findings, showing that guselkumab maintains high levels of skin clearance and good tolerability in daily practice. In a multicentre Italian cohort of 112 patients with prior inadequate response to ustekinumab, the proportion achieving PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 progressively increased during follow-up, reaching 97.1%, 79.4% and 67.6% at week 104.173 Similar long-term improvements were observed in a 104-week retrospective study, where PASI90 and PASI100 rose from 49% and 32.4% at week 16 to 79.6% and 61.1% at 2 years, without new safety signals.174 Another Italian real-life experience documented marked PASI and body surface area (BSA) reductions over 44 weeks, with only one discontinuation due to liver enzyme elevation.175 The PERSIST study confirmed the beneficial impact of guselkumab on QoL, with more than half of patients reaching DLQI ≤1 at week 28.176

Evidence from other countries has been consistent. In a Chinese cohort, 88.6% of patients achieved PASI90 and nearly half reached PASI100 at week 16, with no SAEs.177 Long-term data over 148 weeks indicated lower PASI100 rates in patients with obesity and bio-experienced patients compared with those without obesity or who were bio-naive,178 although other studies did not confirm a significant influence of BMI, smoking or comorbidities.179 Importantly, guselkumab has shown strong efficacy in difficult-to-treat sites. In a prospective study, facial and genital psoriasis improved markedly, with sPGA 0/1 achieved in more than 75% of patients by week 12.180 Nail psoriasis also responded, with significant reductions in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index scores observed from week 28 onwards.181 Similarly, patients with scalp and palmoplantar involvement experienced meaningful improvements, even after failure of previous anti-IL-17 therapy.182

Risankizumab

Risankizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-23p19 subunit, approved by the FDA and EMA in 2019 for moderate-to-severe psoriasis at the dose of 150 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 and then every 12 weeks.183 In the pivotal phase III trials UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2, risankizumab demonstrated clear superiority over ustekinumab and placebo, with PASI90 achieved in ~75% of patients and sPGA 0/1 in over 80% at week 16.184 Similar results emerged in head-to-head studies against other biologics: in IMMvent, risankizumab outperformed adalimumab (PASI90 72% versus 47%),185 whilst in IMMerge it was non-inferior to secukinumab at week 16 and superior at week 52, with PASI90 rates of 86.6% versus 57.1%.186 Long-term data from the LIMMitless extension confirmed sustained responses, with more than 80% of patients maintaining PASI90 after 5 years with a low incidence of AEs.187

Beyond clinical trials, a large body of real-world evidence has confirmed both the efficacy and safety of risankizumab. In Italy, Megna et al. reported a rapid reduction of mean PASI from 12.3 at baseline to 2.7 at week 16,188 whilst a multicentre study by Gargiulo et al. showed PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 rates of 93.9%, 78.6% and 61.1% at 52 weeks, without relevant AEs.189 Similar findings were observed in Poland and the Czech Republic, where PASI90 and PASI100 rates continued to increase up to week 52, achieved in more than 80% and 65% of patients, respectively.190,191 Other studies have highlighted potential predictors of response: Borroni et al. found that high BMI and multiple biologic failures reduced the likelihood of achieving PASI90,192 whereas other real-life cohorts, including Turkish and Italian studies, reported no significant impact of prior biologic exposure.193,194

The benefit of risankizumab has also been confirmed in difficult-to-treat sites. The VESPA study demonstrated consistent improvements not only in PASI and DLQI but also in scalp, nail, palmoplantar and genital involvement.195 Bardazzi et al. noted that clearance of leg lesions may occur more slowly than global PASI improvement.196 Importantly, risankizumab has proven effective in patients in whom previous TNF or IL-17 inhibitor therapy failed, with significant improvements in PASI and BSA even in heavily pre-treated populations.197,198 Long-term observational evidence is also robust: the large IL-PSO study, including more than 1000 patients followed for 3 years, showed PASI improvements approaching 99% and PGA 0/1 achieved in over 75% of patients with difficult-to-treat sites after 1 year, with no unexpected safety signals.199

Tildrakizumab

Tildrakizumab is a humanized anti-IL-23p19 IgG1κ antibody approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, administered s.c. 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4, then every 12 weeks; escalation to 200 mg is possible in patients with high disease burden or >90 kg.200,201

In reSURFACE 1 (n=772), PASI75 at week 12 was achieved by 62% and 64% of patients receiving tildrakizumab 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively, compared to 6% with placebo. PGA 0/1 was achieved in 59%, 58% and 7%, respectively.202,203 In reSURFACE 2 (n=1090), PASI75 at week 12 was achieved by 66% (200 mg), 61% (100 mg), 48% (etanercept) and 6% (placebo), whilst PGA 0/1 responses were 59% (both tildrakizumab doses), 48% (etanercept) and 4% (placebo).202 AE and discontinuation rates were comparable across all treatment groups in both trials. Egeberg et al. presented a pooled analysis of the 5-year long-term extension of these two trials, confirming the safety of this drug.204

Real-life studies corroborate trial results. Ruggiero et al. reported PASI90 and PASI100 at week 28 in 76.1% and 61.9% of patients, sustained to week 52.205 A Spanish study (n=190) showed an 88.8% PASI reduction and DLQI drop from 12.5 to 1.2 at 24 weeks.206 The multicentre TILOT study (n=412) found PASI <5 in 88.4% of patients at week 52, with significant improvement also at scalp and nail sites.207 Other studies confirmed efficacy in difficult areas (scalp, nails, palmoplantar and genital).208210 Wei et al. reported PASI reduction from 15.8 to 1.5 after 1 year.211 Effectiveness was maintained in patients failing biologics, including anti-IL-17 or TNF agents.212,213 Dose flexibility is supported by data: in patients with obesity, 200 mg was associated with higher PASI responses.214,215 Safety in real-life was favourable, with only mild infections (nasopharyngitis, URTI) as the most common AEs.216,217 The ESTER study confirmed safety and efficacy in older patients (mean age 73), with only mild events.218 Other cohorts also demonstrated significant QoL improvements.219223

Small molecules

Apremilast

Apremilast is an oral PDE4 inhibitor that modulates inflammatory pathways involved in psoriasis. It is titrated up to 30 mg twice daily in adults and in children ≥6 years weighing >50 kg, whilst a lower dose of 20 mg BID is recommended for those between 20 and 50 kg.224 Its efficacy was established in the ESTEEM 1 and 2 trials, where PASI75 responses at week 16 were achieved in 28–33% of patients versus 5–6% with placebo, with significant improvements in DLQI.225,226 These results were confirmed in a third phase III trial227 as well as in the EMBRACE and DISCREET studies, which demonstrated benefits in difficult-to-treat areas and genital psoriasis.228,229 Paediatric efficacy was confirmed in the SPROUT trial, with superior sPGA and PASI responses versus placebo and good tolerability.230 Across trials, AEs were mostly mild gastrointestinal or respiratory events, with discontinuation rates of ~8%.225

Real-world studies have provided further support for apremilast effectiveness, particularly in patients unsuitable for treatment with biologics. The OTELO study demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements, with PASI75 achieved in 35.1% of patients at 6 months and significant benefits in patient-reported outcomes.231 An Italian multicentre cohort showed that PASI50 was obtained in 68% of patients within 4 months, with progressive gains up to month 36, including PASI90 in almost one-third.232 Another Italian study reported marked improvements in PASI, BSA and DLQI over 1 year, with only 10.6% discontinuing for lack of efficacy.233 The multinational APPRECIATE study confirmed reductions in PASI, BSA and DLQI over 6 months,234 whilst van den Reek et al. showed significant improvements in QoL and work productivity sustained at 12 months.235 Importantly, apremilast remains a therapeutic option in patients with prior malignancy, as shown by Podevin et al., although, in this setting, a higher discontinuation rate was observed due to gastrointestinal AEs.236

Deucravacitinib

Deucravacitinib is an oral selective TYK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults eligible for systemic therapy.237 TYK2 is a member of the JAK family involved in the JAK–STAT signalling pathway, crucial in inflammatory processes such as psoriasis.237 It is well established that TYK2 pairs with JAK2 for the signalling of IL-12 and IL-23, and it also pairs with JAK1 for signalling downstream of type I interferon receptors. On this basis, the therapeutic role of TYK2 inhibition has emerged in treating psoriasis.238 Deucravacitinib, the first-in-class, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor approved for psoriasis, is administered at a dose of 6 mg once daily. Its efficacy and safety were demonstrated in two pivotal phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and apremilast-controlled trials: POETYK PSO-1 and POETYK PSO-2.239 Of the 667 patients enrolled, 332 were randomized to receive deucravacitinib 6 mg OD, 168 were receiving apremilast 30 mg twice daily and 166 were in the placebo group. At week 16, PASI75 was achieved in 58.4% of patients receiving deucravacitinib compared with 35.1% on apremilast and 12.7% on placebo. Similarly, sPGA 0/1 was reached in 53.6%, 32.1% and 7.2%, respectively. Higher response rates were also observed for PASI90 (35.5%) and PASI100 (14.2%) compared to the other arms (apremilast PASI90/100: 19.6%/3%; placebo PASI90/100: 4.2%/0.6%).239 Patients initially treated with placebo or apremilast and later switched to deucravacitinib (at week 16 if PASI50 was not achieved) showed similar long-term responses, with PASI75 achieved in 65.1% and 68.3% at week 52, respectively. Deucravacitinib also led to greater improvements in QoL, with DLQI 0/1 achieved in 41% at week 16 (versus 28.6% apremilast and 10.6% placebo). Scalp-specific PGA 0/1 was reached in 70.3% versus 39.1% and 17.4% in the same arms.239 The study also evaluated the effects of deucravacitinib on safety, finding that the rate of AEs was comparable between the three groups. Specifically, AEs were detected in 53% of patients on deucravacitinib but only 2.1% were sAEs and a total of 1.8% of patients discontinued the drug due to AEs.239 The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (6.3%), URTIs (6.3%), headache (4.8%) and diarrhoea (3.9%).239 Imafuku et al. formed a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients enrolled in POETYK PSO-1 and found data consistent with those already described on both the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib.240

POETYK PSO-2, which enrolled 1020 patients, confirmed these findings. At week 16, PASI75 was achieved in 53% (deucravacitinib), 39.8% (apremilast) and 9.5% (placebo) of patients and sPGA 0/1 was achieved in 49.5%, 33.9% and 8.6% of patients, respectively.241 Amongst PASI75 responders, rerandomization showed sustained benefit in 80.4% of patients continuing therapy versus 31.3% after switch to placebo.241 The incidence of sAEs remained low (1.6%).240 Further confirmation came from POETYK PSO-3 (PASI75 at week 16: 68.8% versus 8.1% in placebo; sPGA 0/1: 55.6% versus 6.8% in placebo)242 and POETYK PSO-4, which included patients with erythrodermic and generalized pustular psoriasis, showing improvement in DLQI and symptoms.243

The long-term extension POETYK PSO-LTE reported sustained responses at week 148 (PASI75: 73.2%; PASI90: 48.1%; sPGA 0/1: 54.1%), with no new safety signals.244 Moreover, 4-year safety and efficacy results from the phase III POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2 and long-term extension trials demonstrated a consistent safety profile and durable efficacy of deucravacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis even over longer periods of treatment, including difficult-to-treat areas as scalp and fingernails.245 Results from the pooled analysis of the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials, as reported by Merola et al., indicated that deucravacitinib not only improved skin manifestations in patients with psoriasis but also significantly reduced joint pain and musculoskeletal symptoms in those who screened positive for PsA.246 Since deucravacitinib was approved in 2024, few real-life data on it are still available. A 52-week study of 104 patients also evaluated the effectiveness of deucravacitinib on psoriasis of difficult-to-treat sites such as scalp, nails and genitalia.247 At week 52, PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 were obtained in 86.0%, 62.8% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. The regional PGAs of the indicated sites and DLQI were also reduced, with no serious or lethal AEs reported.247 In a study of 33 patients, Hagino et al. also observed that deucravacitinib rapidly reduced pruritus as early as following 2 weeks of therapy, and at week 16 DLQI 0/1 was achieved by 42.9% of patients.248 A case series by Tran et al. reported high discontinuation rates of therapy with deucravacitinib following acneiform eruptions, highlighting the importance of identifying patients at risk and of prevention or early treatment.249 A prospective, single-centre study by Hagino et al.250 evaluated the effectiveness of deucravacitinib in patients with psoriasis, stratified by a history of apremilast or biologic usage. Previous use of apremilast does not appear to attenuate the clinical outcomes of treatment with deucravacitinib as previously observed in phase III clinical trials.239241 The rates of PASI75, PASI100 or absolute PASI ≤1 at week 52 in biologic-naive patients (84.4%, 24.4% or 53.3%) were slightly higher than those in biologic-experienced patients (57.1%, 14.3% or 28.6%), respectively. Globally, deucravacitinib proved a sustained 52-week effectiveness in different patient subgroups.250 Moreover, a recent report on off-label use of deucravacitinib in cases of overlapping psoriasis and atopic dermatitis refractory to conventional medical management highlighted its successful use in this type of complex disease.251

New emerging drugs

Emerging therapeutic agents for psoriasis, including their targets, key drugs under investigation, efficacy outcomes, safety profile and stage of clinical development, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of main emerging therapeutic agents for psoriasis, including their targets, key drugs under investigation, efficacy outcomes, safety profile and stage of clinical development.

Drug/class Target/mechanism Key agents Efficacy summary Safety Development stage
RORγt inhibitors Inhibition of RORγt, a transcription factor essential for T helper 17 cell differentiation Vimirogant, retezorogant, bevurogant PASI reduction up to 38% (PASI75 in 42% for retezorogant); IL-17A/F reduction Headache, nausea, flushing, transaminase elevation Phase II
ROCK2 inhibitors Inhibition of ROCK2, reducing IL-23 and IL-17 cytokine production KD025 (belumosudil) PASI50 in 46% at 12 weeks (KD025); benefit seen with lower dose regimens Reversible liver enzyme elevations in seven patients Phase II
Other IL-23 inhibitors IL-23p19 inhibition (mirikizumab, IBI112, icotrokinra) Mirikizumab, IBI112, icotrokinra PASI90 up to 86% (mirikizumab) Generally well-tolerated; rare cardiovascular AEs with mirikizumab Phase III (mirikizumab, development discontinued); icotrokinra (phase III); early phase (IBI112)
IL-36R inhibitors IL-36 receptor inhibition (spesolimab, imsidolimab) Spesolimab, imsidolimab GPPGA pustulation score = 0 in 54% (spesolimab); rapid effect in generalized pustular psoriasis No serious AEs with Imsidolimab; mild infections with spesolimab Approved (spesolimab); phase III (imsidolimab)
JAK inhibitors Inhibition of JAK–TYK2 pathway (e.g. zasocitinib, VTX958, tofacitinib, upadacitinib) Zasocitinib, VTX958, tofacitinib, upadacitinib PASI75 up to 68% (zasocitinib), 67% (VTX958); JAK inhibitor (e.g. upadacitinib) effective in PsA and eczematous psoriasis Mostly mild/moderate AEs; long-term safety concerns for tofacitinib Phase II–III (zasocitinib, VTX958); off-label/approved for PsA (others)

AEs, adverse events; GPPGA, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; ROCK2, Rho-associated protein kinase 2; RORγt, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γt.

RORγt inhibitors

Retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor-γt (RORγt), a transcription factor essential for the differentiation of T helper 17 (TH17) cells, is overexpressed and plays a critical role in the occurrence of several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including psoriasis. Several inhibitors that specifically target RORγt have been discovered and may represent promising drugs by inhibition of RORyt through ligand domain binding.252,253

Vimirogant (VTP-43742), an oral inhibitor of the RORγt protein, was compared to placebo in a phase II trial and demonstrated reductions of 29% and 23% in PASI score after 4 weeks in patients taking 700 mg and 350 mg of the drug, respectively. A significant decrease in levels of IL-17A and IL-17F was also observed.254 AEs reported included headache, flushing, nausea and transaminase elevation. Retezorogant (JTE-451) was studied in a population of 152 patients in a placebo-controlled phase II trial (IMPACT-PS). After 4 weeks, an average PASI reduction of 30% and 38% was observed in patients administered 200 mg twice daily, and 33% and 42% of patients administered 400 mg twice daily achieved PASI75; a reduction in PASI was observed in only 17% of the patients in the placebo group.255 Furthermore, the percentage of patients achieving PGA 0/1 was 25%, 28% and 9%, respectively. Another oral RORγt inhibitor, bevurogant was assessed in a randomized, double-blinded phase II study, with oral administration of 25, 50, 100 or 200 mg resulting in PASI75 in 5%, 7.7%, 10.3% and 30% of patients, respectively.255

ROCK2 inhibitors

Rho-associated protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitors have emerged as potential candidates for psoriasis treatment by reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and downregulating the TH7 cell-driven autoimmune response. The phase II study by Zanin-Zhorov et al.256 demonstrated that oral administration of a specific ROCK2 inhibitor, KD025, lead to PASI50 in 46% of patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Reduced levels of IL-23 and IL-17 were also found, whilst IL-6 and TNF levels remained unchanged. Clinical benefit, defined as any decrease from the baseline PASI score, has been observed in 85% of patients. Approximately 46% of patients achieved PASI50 gradually during therapy; after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment 14%, 29% and 71% of patients in the 200 mg twice daily cohort achieved PASI50. PASI50 was achieved in 42% and 29% of patients taking 400 mg once daily or 400 mg twice daily, suggesting a potential clinical benefit of using a lower KD025 dosage regimen. No SAEs were reported, except for an increase in liver enzymes, which was reversible with the discontinuation of the drug (as reported in seven patients).256

Although ROCK2 inhibitors represent an innovative therapy, further scientific evidence regarding efficacy and safety is needed to provide a future therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Other IL-23 inhibitors

Mirikizumab is a monoclonal antibody selective for IL-23p19 acting on the IL-23–TH17 pathway.257 In the phase III OASIS-1 trial (n=530), PASI75/PASI90/PASI100 responses at week 16 were 82.5%, 64.3% and 32.4% versus 9.3%, 6.5% and 0.9% with placebo (p<0.001); sPGA 0/1 was achieved in 69.3% versus 6.5% of patients.257,258 Responders rerandomized to different maintenance regimens maintained high responses at week 52 (PASI90 up to 86%).258 In OASIS-2 (n=1465), PASI90 at week 16 was 74.4% with mirikizumab versus 6.3% with placebo but not superior to secukinumab.259 Safety data included rare cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction.260 Development of mirikizumab for psoriasis was discontinued in 2021, though results confirm the efficacy of IL-23p19 blockade.258

IBI112, another IL-23p19 antibody, showed efficacy in preclinical models,261 and a phase I trial in 46 patients showed no SAEs.262 A phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with randomized discontinuation and retreatment has recently been completed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous injection of IBI112 in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.263

Icotrokinra is an oral peptide with high affinity for the IL-23 receptor.263 The FRONTIER-1 (NCT05223868) trial, a phase IIb study evaluating the efficacy and safety of icotrokinra in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, showed a significant dose–response effect at week 16 and a greater efficacy of icotrokinra than placebo.263 FRONTIER-1 participants received icotrokinra at doses from 25 mg daily to 100 mg twice daily or placebo through week 16. Subsequently, patients completing FRONTIER-1 could enrol in FRONTIER-2 and continue icotrokinra at the same dose through week 52. Those on placebo crossed over to icotrokinra 100 mg daily for weeks 16–52. High response rates and improved patient-reported outcomes observed with icotrokinra in FRONTIER-1 were maintained throughout the year of treatment in FRONTIER-2. At week 52, 76% of patients achieved PASI75 with 100 mg twice daily.264 The percentages of patients who achieved a PASI90 and PASI100 response at week 16 (e.g. 60% and 40%, respectively, in the group treated with 100 mg twice daily) were mostly unchanged at week 52 (e.g. 64% and 40%, respectively, in the group treated with 100 mg twice daily); SAEs occurred in 4% of patients.264 Due to the positive results obtained in FRONTIER-1 and FRONTIER-2, two phase III clinical trials are currently under way (ICONIC-LEAD and ICONIC-TOTAL).265,266

IL-36R inhibitors

IL-36 is a member of the IL-1 family, which activates NF-κB and MAPK pathways through the MyD88–IRAK complex.267 The IL-36 family of cytokines includes the three agonists (IL-36α, IL36β and IL-36γ) and one antagonist (IL-36RA).268 Loss-of-function mutations in the Il36ra gene have been detected in a severe form of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and plaque psoriasis.269 Todorović et al. demonstrated that A-552, a small-molecule inhibitor of IL-36, effectively inhibits IL-36γ and the production of other IL-36γ-induced cytokines in human and murine cells.270 Spesolimab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-36 receptor and is currently approved by both the FDA (September 2022) and EMA for the treatment of GPP flares in adults. Its approval was based on the pivotal phase II Effisayil-1 trial, in which 53 patients experiencing a moderate-to-severe GPP flare were enrolled. After 1 week of treatment, 54% of patients receiving spesolimab achieved a GPP Physician Global Assessment pustulation score of 0, compared with only 6% in the placebo group (p<0.001). Moreover, 43% of treated patients achieved a clear or almost clear overall GPP Physician Global Assessment score versus 11% with placebo (p=0.02).271 A 5-year open-label extension study (Effisayil-2) is ongoing to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of spesolimab in preventing GPP flares.272 The low incidence of GPP and limited evidence regarding treatment with spesolimab pose a challenge in determining its efficacy in a real-life setting. A review of real-world experience by Cardenas-de la Garza et al.273 included a total of 62 patients with GPP who were treated with spesolimab. Of these, 6% of patients were aged >75 years and 8% patients were aged <18 years, with a mean age of 49.3 years (SD 20.5); 30 patients showed concomitant plaque psoriasis. Complete GPP remission was observed in 35/62 (56%) patients, 21 of whom achieved it within a week. Partial remission was defined in 27 of the 62 (44%) patients. GPP recurrence after treatment was observed in seven patients. There was a low incidence of AEs, with only eight patients reporting laboratory abnormalities, infections and erythema multiforme. Moreover, spesolimab showed the potential to provide significant and rapid symptom resolution even in patients resistant to conventional therapies. However, data on the impact of spesolimab in patients with concomitant plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are still limited, and it remains unclear whether the recurrence of plaque psoriasis can be effectively prevented with spesolimab.273

Currently, imsidolimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-36 receptor, is in phase III clinical trials. An open-label, single-arm, multiple-dose study was conducted in eight patients affected by GPP (of whom six completed the entire treatment cycle) who received an intravenous dose of imsidolimab 750 mg on day 1, followed by three subcutaneous doses of 100 mg administered on days 29, 57 and 85. The first responses were observed as early as day 3, with continuous improvement until day 113. Only two SAEs were reported.274 The phase III clinical trial GEMINI-1 pointed out that 53.3% of patients receiving a single 750 mg IV dose of imsidolimab achieved clear or almost clear skin by week 4, compared to the 13.3% response rate in the placebo group (p=0.0131), also associated with a strong safety profile for imsidolimab.275

Therefore, anti-IL-36 agents hold significant potential in the treatment of psoriasis, and further research is needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety.

JAK inhibitors

JAKs represent intracellular kinases that activate STAT proteins, which translocate to the nucleus and are responsible for the synthesis of inflammatory nuclear factors. The JAK family includes JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2, whilst STAT signalling involves STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5 (STAT5A and STAT5B) and STAT6. In psoriasis, a key role is played by the IL-23 receptor, which relies on a heterodimer of JAK2 and TYK2 as well as on STAT3 for signal transduction.264

TAK-279 (zasocitinib), a highly selective oral TYK2 inhibitor, is approximately 1.3 million times more selective for TYK2 than JAK1 and is currently in a phase IIb, randomized placebo-controlled trial (NCT04999839).276 In this study, 259 patients were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) between five zasocitinib dosage groups of 2, 5, 15 and 30 mg QD, and placebo to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zasocitinib in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. At week 12, a significantly higher percentage of patients treated with zasocitinib achieved PASI75 (44%, 68% and 67% taking 5 mg, 15 mg and 30 mg, respectively) and PASI90 (21%, 45% and 46%, respectively) compared to the placebo group (PASI75 6%; PASI90 0%). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the 2 mg group in terms of PASI75 (18%) and PASI90 (8%) at 12 weeks compared to placebo. The majority of AEs were mild to moderate. To date, three phase III clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of zasocitinib in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis compared to deucravacitinib, apremilast and placebo.277281

VTX958 is a selective allosteric inhibitor of Tyk2. Bank conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral VTX958 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.282 Patients were divided into four treatment groups (50 mg BID, 300 mg QD, 225 mg BID and 300 mg BID) or placebo. At week 16, the two high doses of VTX958 (225 mg BID and 300 mg BID) achieved significantly superior PASI75 response rates than placebo, without SAEs.280 However, the study is currently terminated.283

Tofacitinib is a JAK inhibitor that demonstrated superiority over placebo in the treatment of plaque psoriasis in phase III studies (OPT Pivotal 1 and 2; OPT Retreatment) but never received FDA approval due to long-term efficacy and safety concerns.284 However, it received approval in 2017 for the treatment of PsA resistant to methotrexate or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs following evidence of its efficacy in the phase III OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond studies.284 Upadacitinib is a JAK inhibitor used against PsA whose efficacy has been demonstrated in the phase III studies SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2. In these studies, the American College of Rheumatology’s criterion for a 20% improvement in the condition of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis was achieved by a higher percentage of patients receiving upadacitinib compared to the placebo group.285288 Furthermore, improvements in PASI75 were also recorded. In the literature, there are case reports demonstrating the efficacy of upadacitinib in the treatment of eczematous psoriasis unresponsive to biological drugs.283,284 However, data are currently lacking, so it remains only a potentially valid strategy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.285288

Jaktinib is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that was evaluated in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study, which has been completed, where patients were divided into four groups, receiving two daily doses of 50, 75 or 100 mg of jaktinib or placebo for 24 weeks.289,290 ESK-001 is a highly selective allosteric inhibitor of TYK2. It was first evaluated in phase I trial, with promising results.291 The STRIDE phase II clinical trial on ESK-001 met its primary end point, showing significant improvements in PASI75 at week 12 for all clinically relevant doses. The maximal efficacy was observed in the highest dose arm (40 mg BID). The drug exhibited a favourable safety profile.292 Currently, a phase II clinical trial open-label extension study is under way to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ESK-001 in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.293 Since the TYK2 inhibition pathway appears promising, several molecules are currently being studied to evaluate their effectiveness in treating psoriasis;289 amongst these are BMS-986322 (NCT05730725 phase II study, completed)294 and BMS-986202 (NCT02763969 phase I study, completed),295 both of which are TYK2 inhibitors, and TLL-018 (NCT05772520 phase II study, completed), which is a highly specific inhibitor of JAK1 and TYK2.296

PDE4 inhibitors

PDE4 inhibitors are being investigated for use against moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Orismilast, an oral PDE4 inhibitor, has shown promising results in psoriasis treatment. In a phase IIa trial with 36 patients, 44.4% of those receiving orismilast 30 mg twice daily reached PASI75 after 16 weeks compared to 5.6% with placebo; reported side-effects included nausea (61.1% versus 5.6% with placebo) and diarrhoea (50% versus 0%).297 A larger phase IIb study with 202 patients tested doses of 20, 30 and 40 mg twice daily, achieving PASI reductions of 52.6%, 61.2% and 63.7% versus 17.3% with placebo. The most frequent AEs were diarrhoea, nausea and headache, with higher doses linked to more treatment discontinuations.298 Currently, no phase III trials have been initiated to further confirm long-term safety and effectiveness.

Mufemilast, an oral PDE4 inhibitor, has been studied for its potential in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. A phase II trial with 216 patients compared doses of 15, 30 and 60 mg twice daily against placebo but the findings have not been published despite completion in 2021.299 A subsequent phase III trial enrolled 306 participants, with 204 receiving 60 mg twice daily and 102 receiving placebo for 16 weeks, after which PASI75 response rates were to be assessed. The placebo group later switched to active treatment for an additional 36 weeks. This trial was completed in July 2023 but the efficacy and safety outcomes remain undisclosed.300

Roflumilast, a PDE4 inhibitor already approved for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and in topical form for psoriasis, has also been tested orally in this disease. In the PSORRO phase II trial with 46 participants, 35% of those on roflumilast reached PASI75 after 12 weeks, whilst none in the placebo group did. After 24 weeks, PASI50, PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 were achieved by 65%, 44%, 22% and 9% of patients, respectively. The most frequent side-effects included gastrointestinal issues, headaches, insomnia and weight loss, leading to discontinuation in 8.7% of patients.301 No further studies are currently ongoing.

Preclinical data of ME3183, another PDE4 inhibitor, indicated that it was markedly more effective than apremilast in suppressing inflammatory cytokines. A phase II study in 132 patients with plaque psoriasis tested several regimens over 16 weeks: PASI75 was achieved in 58.3% (5 mg BID), 61.5% (7.5 mg BID) and 52.0% (15 mg OD) versus 14.8% with placebo, whilst the 10 mg OD group showed no clear benefit. Reported AEs mainly included nausea, diarrhoea and headaches.302 At present, no further trials of ME3183 are ongoing in psoriasis.

Oral IL-17 inhibitors

Secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab and bimekizumab are biologic drugs already approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and have achieved considerable results in terms of efficacy and safety. The goal of future studies for this class is to obtain molecules that can be taken orally.

DC-806 is an oral IL-17A inhibitor that has shown encouraging early results in psoriasis. In a phase I trial with 40 participants, those receiving 800 mg twice daily achieved a PASI reduction of 43.7% on average after 4 weeks, compared to 13.3% in the placebo group. Reported side-effects were all mild or moderate and showed no relation to dosage.303 A phase IIb study involving 229 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis was launched in May 2023 to assess multiple dosing regimens over 12 weeks but its findings have not yet been released.304 DC-853, a next-generation oral IL-17A inhibitor derived from DC-806, entered a phase I trial in March 2024 to test single and multiple doses in 30 healthy volunteers, with results still pending.305 Similarly, LEO 153339, another oral IL-17 inhibitor, was studied in a phase I trial with 108 healthy participants assessing safety and tolerability at different dose levels. This trial ended in July 2022 but no data have been disclosed so far.306

Others

Piclidenoson, an oral A3AR agonist, has undergone several clinical trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis and Crohn’s disease, overexpression of A3AR on the lymphocyte membrane has been observed.307 In a phase II study with 76 patients, the 2 mg twice-daily group showed the best outcome, reaching a 35.3% PASI50 rate at week 12, with statistically significant improvements over placebo.308 A larger phase II/III trial with 293 participants later demonstrated that, by week 32, 63.5%, 35.5%, 24.7% and 10.6% of patients achieved PASI50, PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100, respectively, with good tolerability and no major side-effects.309 A subsequent phase III trial including 528 patients compared piclidenoson (2 and 3 mg), apremilast and placebo; whilst early results in 2022 were encouraging, quality control concerns were raised by the FDA.310 In 2023, both FDA and EMA approved new phase III trials to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in psoriasis.

Vibozilimod (SCD-044) is an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 1 (S1PR1) modulator being developed for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. S1PR1 is highly expressed in lymphocytes, and binding with S1P is involved in the migration of these cells to inflamed tissues, as occurs in psoriasis.307 In an unpublished phase I study, it showed activity by lowering lymphocyte counts in healthy volunteers.311 A phase II trial (SOLARES-PsO-1) is currently ongoing in 240 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, testing three different dosing regimens against placebo. The study aims to assess both efficacy and safety but results are not yet available as completion is still pending.312

RGRN-305 (CUDC-305) is an oral HSP90 inhibitor. In preclinical models, it reduced inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF and IL-23, and showed promising efficacy in a xenograft mouse model.313 A phase Ib proof-of-concept trial enrolled 11 patients treated with 250 mg or 500 mg daily: after 12 weeks, six participants achieved ≥50% PASI improvement (71–94% reduction from baseline).314 Whilst four patients on the higher dose developed an exanthematous rash, no SAEs occurred. Transcriptome analysis further confirmed downregulation of TNF and IL-17-related inflammatory pathways.314 Therefore, HSP90 inhibition is considered a potential therapeutic avenue for psoriasis and other immune-mediated skin diseases.

Several studies are demonstrating the relationship between alterations in the gut microbiota and systemic inflammatory diseases.307 Therefore, certain oral antimicrobials are being investigated for the treatment of psoriasis. KBL697 is an oral probiotic derived from a live strain of Lactobacillus gasseri developed to modulate the gut microbiome. A phase I trial in 36 healthy volunteers tested its safety and tolerability,307 and a phase II study in 80 patients with plaque psoriasis compared low and high doses for efficacy and safety.307 Results from these trials have not yet been released. EDP1815 is a non-live preparation of Prevotella histicola that modulates the immune system in the small intestine to promote anti-inflammatory responses. Preclinical studies in murine models of TH1-mediated and TH17-mediated inflammation showed reductions in systemic inflammation.307 In a phase I trial, patients with psoriasis receiving low-dose or high-dose EDP1815 had average Lesion Severity Score reductions of 23% and 15% after 4 weeks, compared to a 1% increase in placebo, with no significant AEs.315 In a phase II trial with 249 patients, daily doses of 1, 4 or 10 capsules led to PASI50 response rates of 29.7%, 31.9% and 25.0% versus 12.1% in placebo; 60% of responders maintained improvement at 24 weeks. No SAEs were reported, and no further trials are currently ongoing.316

Discussion

This review presents a comprehensive analysis of currently approved biologics and small molecules for the management of psoriasis, providing an in-depth assessment of the existing treatment landscape whilst highlighting its limitations, such as the lack of biomarkers, which could predict treatment response and AEs. Despite the advancements in the psoriasis armamentarium, unmet needs persist, necessitating the exploration of novel and emerging therapies. In this context, new and emerging drugs have been discussed herein to offer readers a wide overview on currently available and forthcoming therapeutic innovations in the psoriasis landscape.

The advent of biologic therapies has significantly revolutionized the management of psoriasis; particularly, the latest biologic classes approved (anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23) have demonstrated high effectiveness and safety profiles. These treatments have set new standards in achieving long-term disease control (complete or almost complete clear skin) with minimal side-effects, making them preferable options for many patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Similarly, despite their lower effectiveness compared to certain biologics, deucravacitinib and apremilast offer a valuable option in patients preferring oral administration, especially those experiencing injection site reactions or with needle phobia. Notably, real-life data on deucravacitinib are still emerging due to its recent approval. Moreover, the future introduction of RORγt and ROCK2 inhibitors, as well as oral anti-IL-23 agents, may provide new oral therapeutic options.

Despite the wide range of available therapies, unmet needs still exist, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and in specific clinical phenotypes such as pustular psoriasis, where a different pathogenesis has been identified, highlighting the need for drugs targeting the IL-36 axis, such as spesolimab, alongside other investigational therapies.

Globally, new drugs are desirable to offer patients a more personalized approach. This patient-centred approach is in line with the current trend in dermatology towards individualized therapy, where the goal is not only to achieve skin clearance but also to improve overall QoL.

Paradoxical reactions may occur during psoriasis treatment with biologics. Amongst these, eczematous paradoxical reactions are more frequently observed with anti-IL-17, often requiring treatment switching. JAK inhibitors appear to be a valuable option in individuals developing eczematous reactions or patients affected by both psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. A key immunological consideration is the shift between TH1 and TH2 pathways during cytokine-targeting treatments. Blocking specific cytokine axes can lead to imbalances and rebound loops, which may contribute to paradoxical reactions or secondary inefficacy. This phenomenon underscores the urgent need for predictive biomarkers to optimize treatment selection and minimize AEs. In the future, advances in pharmacogenetics and artificial intelligence could revolutionize psoriasis management. Artificial intelligence-driven models integrating clinical data, laboratory findings and biomarkers could provide a more objective approach to therapy selection. This would enhance precision medicine by guiding treatment choices and helping establish standardized therapeutic algorithms for first-line, second-line and third-line options.

As regards topical therapies, the introduction of novel topical agents may overcome the limitations associated with the use of topical corticosteroids, particularly for sensitive areas such as the genital region, face or skin folds, where their use is contraindicated. Additionally, new topical drugs could offer more effective and safer solutions as compared with currently available treatments.273

It should be considered that there are still patients with psoriasis unresponsive to currently available biologics and small molecules, or with contraindications to these drugs, where the treatment opportunity landscape is limited. Unfortunately, there are no biomarkers that can predict therapeutic outcomes, leading to the considerations of several factors before starting treatment. In this context, a diverse therapeutic armamentarium is essential to ensuring that patients receive the right treatment at the right moment. These biomarkers would be also desirable for the collection of evidence-based data to guide the dermatologist in treatment switching (intra-class or inter-class switching) as well as to support treatment selection for the prevention of transition from psoriasis to psoriatic arthritis and of cardio-metabolic comorbidities. Psoriasis management may be challenging, particularly in complex cases. Therefore, the availability of new drugs, both systemic and topical, will be crucial in overcoming current limitations, and providing patients with the most personalized and precise therapeutic approach possible.

Supplementary Information

dic.2025-8-4-PLS.pdf (83.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

None.

Footnotes

Contributions: All authors contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosure and potential conflicts of interest: The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. MM is an Associate Editor for Drugs in Context. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests form for the authors is available for download at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/dic.2025-8-4-COI.pdf

Funding declaration: There was no funding associated with the preparation of this article.

Correct attribution: Copyright © 2025 Potestio L, Tommasino N, D’Agostino M, Esposito V, Lauletta G, Portarapillo A, Megna M. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2025-8-4. Published by Drugs in Context under Creative Commons License Deed CC BY NC ND 4.0.

Provenance: Invited; externally peer reviewed.

Drugs in Context is published by BioExcel Publishing Ltd. Registered office: 6 Green Lane Business Park, 238 Green Lane, New Eltham, London, SE9 3TL, UK.

BioExcel Publishing Limited is registered in England Number 10038393. VAT GB 252 7720 07.

For all manuscript and submissions enquiries, contact the Editorial office editorial@drugsincontext.com

For all permissions, rights, and reprints, contact David Hughes david.hughes@bioexcelpublishing.com

Data availability statement

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Boehncke WH, Schön MP. Psoriasis. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):983–994. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61909-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rendon A, Schäkel K. Psoriasis pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1475. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iznardo H, Puig L. Beyond plaque psoriasis - pathogenesis and treatment of other psoriasis phenotypes. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2022;34(4):225–234. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vasudevan B, Das P, Bhatt S. Pustular psoriasis: a distinct aetiopathogenic and clinical entity. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023;90(1):19–29. doi: 10.25259/IJDVL_542_2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maronese CA, Valenti M, Moltrasio C, et al. Paradoxical psoriasis: an updated review of clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment options. J Invest Dermatol. 2024;144(11):2364–2376. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nabieva K, Vender R. Quality of life and body region affected by psoriasis: a systematic review. [Artículo traducido] Calidad de vida y región corporal afectada por la psoriasis: una revisión sistemática. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2023;114(1):T33–T38. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2022.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Šmejkalová J, Borská L, Hamáková K, Hodačová L, Čermáková E, Fiala Z. Quality of life of patients with psoriasis. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020;28(3):219–225. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a5611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamazaki F. Psoriasis: comorbidities. J Dermatol. 2021;48(6):732–740. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Taliercio M, Lebwohl M. Psoriasis comorbidities and their treatment impact. Dermatol Clin. 2024;42(3):405–416. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2024.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kamiya K, Kishimoto M, Sugai J, Komine M, Ohtsuki M. Risk factors for the development of psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(18):4347. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van de Kerkhof PC. From empirical to pathogenesis-based treatments for psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142(7):1778–1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Potestio L, Martora F, Lauletta G, Vallone Y, Battista T, Megna M. The role of interleukin 23/17 axis in psoriasis management: a comprehensive review of clinical trials. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:829–842. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S462797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nast A, Smith C, Spuls PI, et al. EuroGuiDerm guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris - Part 1: treatment and monitoring recommendations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(11):2461–2498. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nast A, Smith C, Spuls PI, et al. EuroGuiDerm guideline on the systemic treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris - Part 2: specific clinical and comorbid situations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(2):281–317. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naidu H, Karagaiah P, Patil A, et al. New biologics and oral drugs in treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):826–831. doi: 10.36849/JDD.6443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Portarapillo A, Potestio L, Tommasino N, et al. Novel pharmacotherapies and breakthroughs in psoriasis treatment: 2024 and beyond. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2024;25(9):1187–1198. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2373354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Megna M, Lauletta G, Tommasino N, et al. Management of psoriasis patients with serious infectious diseases. Adv Ther. 2024;41(6):2099–2111. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02873-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Potestio L, Tommasino N, Lauletta G, Martora F, Megna M. Psoriasis and molecular target therapies: evidence of efficacy in preventing cardiovascular comorbidities. Dermatol Ther. 2024;14(4):841–852. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01152-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kofoed K, Skov L, Zachariae C. New drugs and treatment targets in psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(2):133–139. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Calabrese L, Malvaso D, Antonelli F, Mannino M, Peris K, Chiricozzi A. Investigational systemic drugs for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: what’s new? Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2023;32(3):229–243. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2023.2184684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Campa M, Ryan C, Menter A. An overview of developing TNF-α targeted therapy for the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2015;24(10):1343–1354. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2015.1076793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tracey D, Klareskog L, Sasso EH, Salfeld JG, Tak PP. Tumor necrosis factor antagonist mechanisms of action: a comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;17(2):244–279. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Enbrel® (etanercept) [prescribing information] Thousand Oaks, CA: Immunex Corporation; [Accessed January 10, 2025]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/103795s5591lbl.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schmitt J, Rosumeck S, Thomaschewski G, Sporbeck B, Haufe E, Nast A. Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(2):274–303. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Papp KA, Poulin Y, Bissonnette R, et al. Assessment of the long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis in an adult population. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(2):e33–e45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Luger T, Schopf RE, Schwanke A, Langhammer S, Meng T, Löschmann PA. An observational study to evaluate the long-term outcomes of treatment with etanercept in patients with plaque-type psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(10):1730–1741. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kimball AB, Leonardi C, Stahle M, et al. Demography, baseline disease characteristics and treatment history of patients with psoriasis enrolled in a multicentre, prospective, disease-based registry (PSOLAR) Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(1):137–147. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Remicade® (infliximab) [prescribing information] Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc; 2015. [Accessed January 10, 2025]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/remicade-epar-product-information_en.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gottlieb AB, Evans R, Li S, et al. Infliximab induction therapy for patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(4):534–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, et al. Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9494):1367–1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Menter A, Feldman SR, Weinstein GD, et al. A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(1):31e1–31.e315. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shear NH, Hartmann M, Toledo-Bahena M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab maintenance therapy in patients with plaque-type psoriasis in real-world practice. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(3):631–641. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spertino J, Lopez-Ferrer A, Vilarrasa E, Puig L. Long-term study of infliximab for psoriasis in daily practice: drug survival depends on combined treatment, obesity and infusion reactions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(11):1514–1521. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Amerio P, Amoruso G, Bardazzi F, et al. Detection and management of latent tuberculosis infections before biologic therapy for psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2013;24(4):305–311. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2011.654107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Megna M, Lauletta G, Tommasino N, et al. Management of psoriasis patients with serious infectious diseases. Adv Ther. 2024;41(6):2099–2111. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02873-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rustin MH. Long-term safety of biologics in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: review of current data. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(Suppl 3):3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Humira® (adalimumab) [Prescribing information] North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc; [Accessed January 10, 2025]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/overview/humira-epar-medicine-overview_en.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Menter A, Tyring SK, Gordon K, et al. Adalimumab therapy for moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomized, controlled phase III trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(1):106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Saurat JH, Stingl G, Dubertret L, et al. Efficacy and safety results from the randomized controlled comparative study of adalimumab vs. methotrexate vs. placebo in patients with psoriasis (CHAMPION) Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(3):558–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Asahina A, Nakagawa H, Etoh T, Ohtsuki M Adalimumab M04-688 Study Group. Adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from a phase II/III randomized controlled study. J Dermatol. 2010;37(4):299–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2009.00748.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kimball AB, Bensimon AG, Guerin A, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab among patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with co-morbidities: subanalysis of results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011;12(1):51–62. doi: 10.2165/11530640-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Prussick R, Unnebrink K, Valdecantos WC. Efficacy of adalimumab compared with methotrexate or placebo stratified by baseline BMI in a randomized placebo-controlled trial in patients with psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(8):864–868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Revicki DA, Willian MK, Menter A, et al. Impact of adalimumab treatment on patient-reported outcomes: results from a Phase III clinical trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007;18(6):341–350. doi: 10.1080/09546630701646172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Revicki D, Willian MK, Saurat JH, et al. Impact of adalimumab treatment on health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes: results from a 16-week randomized controlled trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(3):549–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gordon K, Papp K, Poulin Y, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated continuously over 3 years: results from an open-label extension study for patients from REVEAL. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(2):241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Papp K, Menter A, Poulin Y, Gu Y, Sasso EH. Long-term outcomes of interruption and retreatment vs. continuous therapy with adalimumab for psoriasis: subanalysis of REVEAL and the open-label extension study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(5):634–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Papp K, Crowley J, Ortonne JP, et al. Adalimumab for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety of retreatment and disease recurrence following withdrawal from therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(2):434–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gordon KB, Gottlieb AB, Langely RG, et al. Adalimumab retreatment successfully restores clinical response and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who undergo therapy interruption. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(4):767–776. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thaci D, Ortonne JP, Chimenti S, et al. A phase IIIb, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab with and without calcipotriol/betamethasone topical treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: the BELIEVE study. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(2):402–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09791.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chiricozzi A, Zangrilli A, Bavetta M, Bianchi L, Chimenti S, Saraceno R. Real-life 9-year experience with adalimumab in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: results of a single-centre, retrospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(2):304–311. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu JJ, Abramovits W, Valdecantos WC, et al. 14030 Ten-year interim results from the ESPRIT registry: real-world safety, effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes of adalimumab for moderate to severe psoriasis. J Amer Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:AB17. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0198-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Menter A, Thaçi D, Papp KA, et al. Five-year analysis from the ESPRIT 10-year postmarketing surveillance registry of adalimumab treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(3):410–9e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.UCB Inc. [Accessed January 10, 2025];Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia): US prescribing information. http://www.cimzia.com . [Google Scholar]
  • 54.European Medicines Agency. [Accessed January 10, 2025];Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia): EU summary of product characteristics. http://www.ema.europa.eu . [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lebwohl M, Blauvelt A, Paul C, et al. Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: results through 48 weeks of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, etanercept and placebo-controlled study (CIMPACT) J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):266e5–276.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mariette X, Förger F, Abraham B, et al. Lack of placental transfer of certolizumab pegol during pregnancy: results from CRIB, a prospective, postmarketing, pharmacokinetic study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(2):228–233. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gottlieb AB, Blauvelt A, Thaci D, et al. Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: results through 48 weeks from 2 phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies (CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2) J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):302e6–314.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gisondi P, Gottlieb AB, Elewski B, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life in patients with plaque psoriasis treated with certolizumab pegol: three-year results from two randomised phase 3 studies (CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2) Dermatol Ther. 2023;13(1):315–328. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00861-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Warren RB, Lebwohl M, Sofen H, et al. Three-year efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: results from the randomized phase 3 CIMPACT trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(12):2398–2408. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gordon KB, Warren RB, Gottlieb AB, et al. Long-term efficacy of certolizumab pegol for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: 3-year results from two randomized phase III trials (CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2) Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(4):652–662. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Korge B, Vanhooteghem O, Lynde CW, et al. Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in routine clinical practice: one-year results from the CIMREAL study. Dermatol Ther. 2024;14(8):2077–2092. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dattola A, Balato A, Megna M, et al. Certolizumab for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a real-world multicentre Italian study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(12):2839–2845. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Blauvelt A, Paul C, van de Kerkhof P, et al. Long-term safety of certolizumab pegol in plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis over 3 years from three phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(4):640–651. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fletcher JM, Moran B, Petrasca A, Smith CM. IL-17 in inflammatory skin diseases psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020;201(2):121–134. doi: 10.1111/cei.13449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Senra L, Stalder R, Alvarez Martinez D, Chizzolini C, Boehncke WH, Brembilla NC. Keratinocyte-derived IL-17E contributes to inflammation in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(10):1970–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Blauvelt A, Chiricozzi A. The immunologic role of IL-17 in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pathogenesis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Dec;55(3):379–390. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8702-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Potestio L, Martora F, Lauletta G, Vallone Y, Battista T, Megna M. The role of interleukin 23/17 axis in psoriasis management: a comprehensive review of clinical trials. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:829–842. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S462797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Krueger JG, Wharton KA, Jr, Schlitt T, et al. IL-17A inhibition by secukinumab induces early clinical, histopathologic, and molecular resolution of psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(3):750–763. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Blauvelt A. Safety of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(10):1413–1420. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1221923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.European Medicines Agency. Cosentyx, INN secukinumab European Medicines Agency Product information. [Accessed January 10, 2025]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/cosentyx .
  • 71.Malagoli P, Dapavo P, Amerio P, et al. Secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis: a narrative review on early treatment and real-world evidence. Dermatol Ther. 2024;14(10):2739–2757. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01255-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Augustin M, Reich K, Yamauchi P, et al. Secukinumab dosing every 2 weeks demonstrated superior efficacy compared with dosing every 4 weeks in patients with psoriasis weighing 90 kg or more: results of a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186(6):942–954. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis – results of two phase 3 trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):326–338. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bissonnette R, Luger T, Thaçi D, et al. Secukinumab demonstrates high sustained efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis through 5 years of treatment (SCULPTURE Extension Study) J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(9):1507–1514. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Blair HA. Correction to: secukinumab: a review in psoriatic arthritis. Drugs. 2021;81(4):483–494. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01513-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Reich K, Sullivan J, Arenberger P, et al. Secukinumab shows high and sustained efficacy in nail psoriasis: 2.5-year results from the randomized placebo-controlled TRANSFIGURE study. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(3):425–436. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bagel J, Duffin KC, Moore A, et al. The effect of secukinumab on moderate-to-severe scalp psoriasis: results of a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(4):667–674. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gottlieb A, Sullivan J, van Doorn M, et al. Secukinumab shows significant efficacy in palmoplantar psoriasis: results from GESTURE, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(1):70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chiricozzi A, Balato A, Conrad C, et al. Secukinumab demonstrates improvements in absolute and relative psoriasis area severity indices in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from a European, multicentric, retrospective, real-world study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31(5):476–483. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1671577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Acer E, Erdoğan HK, Ağaoğlu E, Baştürk H, Bilgin M, Saraçoğlu ZN. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in psoriasis: five-year real life experience. An Bras Dermatol. 2024;99(6):840–846. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2023.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tada Y, Morita A, Yamanaka K, et al. Real-world retention rates and effectiveness of secukinumab in psoriasis: results from a multicenter cohort study (RAILWAY) J Dermatol. 2023;50(11):1415–1426. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mastorino L, Dapavo P, Cariti C, et al. Drug survival, safety, and effectiveness of secukinumab for up to 5 years in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a long-term real-life experience. J Pers Med. 2024;14(7):718. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Russo F, Galluzzo M, Stingeni L, et al. Long-term drug survival and effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: 42-month results from the SUPREME 2.0 study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:3561–3574. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S416149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ak T, Mustafayeva L, Ayla AY, Celik Y, Can G, Ugurlu S. Secukinumab after first-line tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy in psoriatic arthritis: a real-world retrospective cohort study. Arch Rheumatol. 2024;39(1):71–80. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Warren RB, Barker JNWB, Finlay AY, et al. Secukinumab for patients failing previous tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy: results of a randomized open-label study (SIGNATURE) Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(1):60–70. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Megna M, Camela E, Cinelli E, Fabbrocini G. Real-life efficacy and safety of secukinumab in elderly patients with psoriasis over a 2-year period. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45(7):848–852. doi: 10.1111/ced.14258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pellegrini C, Esposito M, Rossi E, et al. Secukinumab in patients with psoriasis and a personal history of malignancy: a multicenter real-life observational study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;12(11):2613–2626. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00797-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Eshwar V, Kamath A. Assessment of safety profile of secukinumab in real-world scenario using United States food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50013-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bilal H, Khan MN, Khan S, et al. Risk of candidiasis associated with interleukin-17 inhibitors: implications and management. Mycology. 2023;15(1):30–44. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2023.2265664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.van de Kerkhof PC, Griffiths CE, Reich K, et al. Secukinumab long-term safety experience: a pooled analysis of 10 phase II and III clinical studies in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75(1):83–98e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sun R, Bustamante M, Gurusamy VK, et al. Safety of secukinumab from 1 million patient-years of exposure: experience from post-marketing setting and clinical trials. Dermatol Ther. 2024;14(3):729–743. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01122-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gottlieb AB, Deodhar A, Mcinnes IB, et al. Long-term safety of secukinumab over five years in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: update on integrated pooled clinical trial and post-marketing surveillance data. Acta Derm Venereol. 2022;102:adv00698. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Preuss CV, Quick J. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Ixekizumab. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28613740/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.European Medicines Agency. [Accessed January 10, 2025];Taltz, INN ixekizumab European Medicines Agency Product information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/taltz . [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Syed YY. Ixekizumab: a review in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:147–158. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hebert AA, Bobonich MA, Rodriguez Capriles C, et al. Higher rates of skin clearance and efficacy in challenging body areas are associated with better health-related quality of life following ixekizumab maintenance treatment in pediatric patients with plaque psoriasis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2022;39(1):55–60. doi: 10.1111/pde.14892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Farahnik B, Beroukhim K, Zhu TH, et al. Ixekizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a review of phase III trials. Dermatol Ther. 2016;6(1):25–37. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0102-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Gordon KB, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, et al. Phase 3 trials of ixekizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):345–356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1512711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Blauvelt A, Lebwohl MG, Mabuchi T, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab: a 5-year analysis of the UNCOVER-3 randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(2):360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Leonardi C, Reich K, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 5 years in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: long-term results from the UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 phase-3 randomized controlled trials. Dermatol Ther. 2020;10(3):431–447. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00367-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Paller AS, Seyger MMB, Alejandro Magariños G, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IXORA-PEDS) Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):231–241. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Paller AS, Seyger MMB, Magariños GA, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of up to 108 weeks of ixekizumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: the IXORA-PEDS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(5):533–541. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Blauvelt A, Papp K, Gottlieb A, et al. A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 12-week efficacy, safety and speed of response from a randomized, double-blinded trial. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(6):1348–1358. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wasel N, Thaçi D, French LE, et al. Ixekizumab and ustekinumab efficacy in nail psoriasis in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase 3, head-to-head study (IXORA-S) Dermatol Ther. 2020;10(4):663–670. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00383-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.van de Kerkhof P, Guenther L, Gottlieb AB, et al. Ixekizumab treatment improves fingernail psoriasis in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the randomized, controlled and open-label phases of UNCOVER-3. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(3):477–482. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Valenti M, Gargiulo L, Ibba L, et al. Effectiveness of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with involvement of difficult-to-treat areas: A 52-week multicenter retrospective study. J Dermatol. 2024;51(6):839–843. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Guenther L, Potts Bleakman A, Weisman J, et al. Ixekizumab results in persistent clinical improvement in moderate-to-severe genital psoriasis during a 52 week, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(1):adv00006. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Reich K, Conrad C, Kristensen LE, et al. Network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of biologic treatments for achieving complete resolution of nail psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(3):1652–1660. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1892024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Saeki H, Nakagawa H, Nakajo K, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis and generalized pustular psoriasis: results from a 52-week, open-label, phase 3 study (UNCOVER-J) J Dermatol. 2017;44(4):355–362. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Trovato E, Orsini C, Russo F, Cortonesi G, Rubegni P. Ixekizumab as treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(2):e14868. doi: 10.1111/dth.14868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Megna M, Gallo L, Balato N, Balato A. A case of erythrodermic psoriasis successfully treated with ixekizumab. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(2):e12825. doi: 10.1111/dth.12825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pinto-Pulido EL, Polo-Rodríguez I, González-Cañete M, García-Verdú E, Piteiro-Bermejo AB, Medina-Montalvo S. Ixekizumab treatment for drug-induced erythrodermic psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(11):e15863. doi: 10.1111/dth.15863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lo Y, Tsai TF. Clinical experience of ixekizumab in the treatment of patients with history of chronic erythrodermic psoriasis who failed secukinumab: a case series. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(5):1106–1107. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Caldarola G, Chiricozzi A, Megna M, et al. Real-life experience with ixekizumab in plaque psoriasis: a multi-center, retrospective, 3-year study. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2023;23(4):365–370. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2193288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Malagoli P, Dapavo P, Pavia G, et al. Real life long-term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 192 weeks multicentric retrospective study-IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis) Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(8):e15608. doi: 10.1111/dth.15608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Magdaleno-Tapial J, Carmena-Ramón R, Valenzuela-Oñate C, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in a real-life practice: a retrospective bicentric study. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2019;110(7):585–589. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Mastorino L, Cariti C, Susca S, et al. Comparison between brodalumab, secukinumab and ixekizumab effectiveness and drug survival: a real-life experience on 638 patients with psoriasis. Exp Dermatol. 2023;32(9):1591–1594. doi: 10.1111/exd.14874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Megna M, Potestio L, Camela E, Fabbrocini G, Ruggiero A. Ixekizumab and brodalumab indirect comparison in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from an Italian single-center retrospective study in a real-life setting. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(9):e15667. doi: 10.1111/dth.15667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Galluzzo M, D’adamio S, Bianchi L, Talamonti M. Brodalumab for the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016;12(12):1255–1271. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2016.1246957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.European Medicines Agency. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Kyntheum INN brodalumab European Medicines Agency Product information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/kyntheum . [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Facheris P, Valenti M, Pavia G, et al. Brodalumab: a new way to inhibit IL-17 in psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(3):e13403. doi: 10.1111/dth.13403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Golbari NM, Basehore BM, Zito PM. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Brodalumab. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29261896/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Papp KA, Reich K, Paul C, et al. A prospective phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of brodalumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(2):273–286. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Papp K, Menter A, Leonardi C, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of brodalumab in psoriasis through 120 weeks and after withdrawal and retreatment: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III trial (AMAGINE-1) Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(6):1037–1048. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lebwohl M, Strober B, Menter A, et al. Phase 3 studies comparing brodalumab with ustekinumab in psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1318–1328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Gregoriou S, Tsiogka A, Tsimpidakis A, Nicolaidou E, Kontochristopoulos G, Rigopoulos D. Treatment of nail psoriasis with brodalumab: an open-label unblinded study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(4):e299–e301. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Elewski B, Rich P, Lain E, Soung J, Lewitt GM, Jacobson A. Efficacy of brodalumab in the treatment of scalp and nail psoriasis: results from three phase 3 trials. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(1):261–265. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1749546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Mease PJ, Helliwell PS, Hjuler KF, Raymond K, McInnes I. Brodalumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from the randomised phase III AMVISION-1 and AMVISION-2 trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(2):185–193. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kim TH, Kishimoto M, Wei JC, Jeong H, Nozaki A, Kobayashi S. Brodalumab, an anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody, in axial spondyloarthritis: 68-week results from a phase 3 study. Rheumatology. 2023;62(5):1851–1859. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Yamasaki K, Nakagawa H, Kubo Y, Ootaki K Japanese Brodalumab Study Group. Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis and psoriatic erythroderma: results from a 52-week, open-label study. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(3):741–751. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Rigopoulos D, Angelakopoulos C, Apalla Z, et al. Real world experience of brodalumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the Greek population: results from an interim analysis of the BrIDGE study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(12):e15886. doi: 10.1111/dth.15886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Schaeffer L, Ben-Anaya N, Sorbe C, Rustenbach SJ, Mrowietz U, Augustin M. Real-world outcomes and drug survival of brodalumab: results from the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2340107. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2340107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Gaudet V, Yap B, Hassan S, Barbeau M. Brodalumab for plaque psoriasis: a Canadian real-world experience at 2-years post-launch. J Cutan Med Surg. 2023;27(3):226–235. doi: 10.1177/12034754231168851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.von Kiedrowski R, Hinz T, Mauer G, et al. Management of moderate to severe psoriasis with brodalumab – real-world evidence from the LIBERO study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38(11):2156–2166. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kojanova M, Turkova B, Gkalpakiotis S, et al. Real-world data on brodalumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: an observational study from the Czech Republic BIOREP registry. Adv Ther. 2024;41(10):3951–3971. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02952-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ruggiero A, Potestio L, Camela E, Fabbrocini G, Megna M. Bimekizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a review of the current knowledge. Psoriasis. 2022;12:127–137. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S367744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.European Medicines Agency. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Bimzelx INN bimekizumab European Medicines Agency Product information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/bimzelx . [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Mitrić MM. Bimekizumab-bkzx. Clin Ther. 2024;46(4):379–380. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Freitas E, Blauvelt A, Torres T. Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Psoriasis. Drugs. 2021;81(15):1751–1762. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01612-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Papp KA, Merola JF, Gottlieb AB, et al. Dual neutralization of both interleukin 17A and interleukin 17F with bimekizumab in patients with psoriasis: results from BE ABLE 1, a 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):277–286e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Merola JF, et al. Bimekizumab for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: 60-week results from BE ABLE 2, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1367–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Gordon KB, Foley P, Krueger JG, et al. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10273):475–486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00126-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10273):487–498. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Reich K, Warren RB, Lebwohl M, et al. Bimekizumab versus Secukinumab in Plaque Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):142–152. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Strober B, Paul C, Blauvelt A, et al. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: two-year interim results from the open-label extension of the randomized BE RADIANT phase 3b trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(3):486–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Bagel J, et al. Bimekizumab versus adalimumab in plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(2):130–141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Gordon KB, Langley RG, Warren RB, et al. Bimekizumab safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled data from up to 3 years of treatment in randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2024;190(4):477–485. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Gargiulo L, Narcisi A, Ibba L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a real-life multicenter study-IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis) Front Med. 2023;10:1243843. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1243843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Potestio L, Ruggiero A, Martora F, Megna M. Long-term efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in real-world setting: a 52-week prospective study. Arch Dermatol Res. 2024;317(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03594-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Hagino T, Saeki H, Fujimoto E, Kanda N. Effectiveness of long-term bimekizumab treatment and predictive factors for responders in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 52-week real-world study. J Dermatol. 2024 doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Orsini D, Malagoli P, Balato A, et al. Bimekizumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis with involvement of genitalia: a 16-week multicenter real-world experience - IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis) Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024;14(2):e2024052. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1402a52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hagino T, Onda M, Saeki H, Fujimoto E, Kanda N. Effectiveness of bimekizumab for genital, nail, and scalp lesions with psoriasis: a 24-week real-world study. J Dermatol. 2024;51(12):1658–1664. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Megna M, Ruggiero A, Torta G, Martora F, Bianco M, Potestio L. Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in real-world psoriasis management: data from patients who are biologic-naive vs. biologic-experienced. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2024;49(10):1186–1189. doi: 10.1093/ced/llae147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Stelara: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/stelara-epar-product-information_en.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Savage LJ, Wittmann M, McGonagle D, Helliwell PS. Ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2015;2(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s40744-015-0010-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1) Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1665–1674. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60725-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2) Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1675–1684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60726-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Kimball AB, Papp KA, Wasfi Y, et al. Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(12):1535–1545. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, with and without dosing adjustment, in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 2 study through 5 years of follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1371–1383. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Galluzzo M, D’Adamio S, Silvaggio D, et al. Ustekinumab treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: eight-year real-life experience. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20(1):95–104. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1684472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Babuna Kobaner G, Polat Ekinci A, Kutlay A. Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 9-year real-life experience from a tertiary referral center in Turkey. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(4):e15042. doi: 10.1111/dth.15042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Acer E, İğrek A, Erdoğan HK, Saracoğlu ZN. Ustekinumab in psoriasis: five-year real-life experience from a single tertiary centre. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(2):e13224. doi: 10.1111/dth.13224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Li X, Xie X, Li J, et al. Short-term effectiveness and potential factors of ustekinumab based on real-world data in Chinese psoriasis patients. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2321188. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2321188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Guo B, Jin X, Fan L, Zhang Y, Xu B, Yang T. Treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction of ustekinumab compared with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a real-world study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2405554. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2405554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Pinheiro RR, Duarte B, Ferreira A, Cabete J. Ustekinumab in patients previously treated with TNFα inhibitors: a real-life study. Eur J Dermatol. 2018;28(1):89–91. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2017.3154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Damiani G, Conic RRZ, de Vita V, et al. When IL-17 inhibitors fail: real-life evidence to switch from secukinumab to adalimumab or ustekinumab. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(2):e12793. doi: 10.1111/dth.12793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Hesselvig JH, Egeberg A, Loft ND, Zachariae C, Kofoed K, Skov L. Correlation between dermatology life quality index and psoriasis area and severity index in patients with psoriasis Treated with Ustekinumab. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018;98(3):335–339. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.European Medicines Agency. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Tremfya. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/tremfya . [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):418–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Langley RG, Tsai TF, Flavin S, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double-blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(1):114–123. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Reich K, Armstrong AW, Langley RG, et al. Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10201):831–839. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31773-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Megna M, Balato A, Caccavale S, et al. Real-life effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: a 3-year multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2552. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Gargiulo L, Ibba L, Cortese A, et al. Real-life effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a 104-week retrospective single-center study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):632–639. doi: 10.36849/JDD.7486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Megna M, Fabbrocini G, Cinelli E, Camela E, Ruggiero A. Guselkumab in moderate to severe psoriasis in routine clinical care: an Italian 44-week real-life experience. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(2):1074–1078. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1800577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Gerdes S, Bräu B, Hoffmann M, et al. Real-world effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis: health-related quality of life and efficacy data from the noninterventional, prospective, German multicenter PERSIST trial. J Dermatol. 2021;48(12):1854–1862. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Zhuang JY, Li JS, Zhong YQ, et al. Evaluation of short-term (16-week) effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis: a prospective real-life study on the Chinese population. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(5):e15054. doi: 10.1111/dth.15054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Galluzzo M, Marcelli L, Vellucci L, et al. Guselkumab for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: real-life effectiveness and drug-survival for up to 148 weeks. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2023;23(4):371–381. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2194485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Bardazzi F, Viviani F, Merli Y, et al. Guselkumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a 60-week real-life multicenter retrospective experience. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22(12):1561–1566. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2064216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Bonifati C, Lembo S, Richetta AG, et al. Effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: interim analysis results at week 12 from the GULLIVER study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 doi: 10.1111/jdv.20187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Megna M, Potestio L, Ruggiero A, Camela E, Fabbrocini G. Guselkumab is efficacious and safe in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a 52-week real-life study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(5):2560–2564. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2036674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Megna M, Ruggiero A, Martora F, Vallone Y, Guerrasio G, Potestio L. long-term efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a two-year real-life study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(9):2691. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Skyrizi: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/skyrizi-epar-product-information_en.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):650–661. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Reich K, Gooderham M, Thaçi D, et al. Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10198):576–586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30952-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Poulin Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, efficacy-assessor-blinded clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(1):50–59. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Puig L, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: interim analysis of the LIMMitless open-label extension trial up to 5 years of follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(6):1149–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.07.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Megna M, Cinelli E, Gallo L, et al. Risankizumab in real life: preliminary results of efficacy and safety in psoriasis during a 16-week period. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022;314(6):619–623. doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02200-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Gargiulo L, Ibba L, Pavia G, et al. Real-life effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in 131 patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a 52-week retrospective study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;12(10):2309–2324. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00795-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Adamczyk M, Bartosińska J, Raczkiewicz D, et al. Risankizumab therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis-a multi-center, long-term, real-life study from Poland. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1675. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Gkalpakiotis S, Cetkovska P, Arenberger P, et al. Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: real-life multicenter experience from the Czech Republic. Dermatol Ther. 2021;11(4):1345–1355. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00556-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Borroni RG, Malagoli P, Gargiulo L, et al. Real-life effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a 40-week multicentric retrospective study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021;101(11):adv00605. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v101.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Gönülal M, Balcı DD, Öztürkcan S. Risankizumab for the treatment of the patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis during a 24-week period: real-life experience. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:3653–3659. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S442427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Caldarola G, Zangrilli A, Bernardini N, et al. Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a multicenter, retrospective, 1 year real-life study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(6):e15489. doi: 10.1111/dth.15489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Orsini D, Assorgi C, Bonifati C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in VEry severe plaque psoriasis: a real-life retrospective study (VESPA-Study) J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2358150. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2358150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Bardazzi F, Filippi F, Mussi M, et al. Psoriasis with Leg Involvement as the new difficult-to-treat area: a cohort study of patients treated with risankizumab. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024;14(3):e2024171. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1403a171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Megna M, Fabbrocini G, Ruggiero A, Cinelli E. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL-17, anti-12/23 and/or anti IL-23: preliminary data of a real-life 16-week retrospective study. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14144. doi: 10.1111/dth.14144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Megna M, Potestio L, Ruggiero A, Camela E, Fabbrocini G. Risankizumab treatment in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17: a 52-week real-life study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(7):e15524. doi: 10.1111/dth.15524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Gargiulo L, Ibba L, Malagoli P, et al. Effectiveness, tolerability, and drug survival of risankizumab in a real-world setting: a three-year retrospective multicenter study-IL PSO (ITALIAN LANDSCAPE PSORIASIS) J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):495. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Ilumetri: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/ilumetri-epar-product-information_en.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Dapavo P, Burlando M, Guarneri C, et al. Tildrakizumab: the value of a personalized and flexible approach for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients with high body weight or high disease burden. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2024;24(3):133–138. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2325547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):276–288. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31279-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Thaci D, Piaserico S, Warren RB, et al. Five-year efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who respond at week 28: pooled analyses of two randomized phase III clinical trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(2):323–334. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Egeberg A, Jullien D, Gaarn Du Jardin K, Thaçi D. Five-year safety of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis from two phase 3 trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): number needed to harm for occurrence of adverse events of special interest. J Dermatolog Treat. 2023;34(1):2220447. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2220447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Ruggiero A, Fabbrocicni G, Cacciapuoti S, Potestio L, Gallo L, Megna M. Tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from 52 weeks real-life retrospective study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:529–536. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S402183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Berenguer-Ruiz S, Aparicio-Domínguez M, Herranz-Pinto P, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of psoriasis in real-world settings at 24 weeks: a retrospective, observational, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(12):2517–2525. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Tsianakas A, Schwichtenberg U, Pierchalla P, Hinz T, Diemert S, Korge B. Real-world effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab in long-term treatment of plaque psoriasis: results from the non-interventional, prospective, multicentre study TILOT. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(1):85–92. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Cacciapuoti S, Potestio L, Gallo L, et al. Short-term efficacy of tildrakizumab on difficult-to-treat areas: a real-world experience. Int J Dermatol. 2025;64(2):319–324. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Galluzzo M, Talamonti M, Cioni A, et al. Efficacy of tildrakizumab for the treatment of difficult-to-treat areas: scalp, nail, palmoplantar and genital psoriasis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2631. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Megna M, Tommasino N, Potestio L, et al. Real-world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab: results from an Italian 28-week retrospective study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(6):2813–2820. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2081655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Wei NW, Chi S, Lebwohl MG. Retrospective analysis in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab: real-life clinical data. J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2022;7(2):55–59. doi: 10.1177/24755303221077211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Di Brizzi EV, Buononato D, Benvenuto P, et al. Effectiveness and safety after a switch to tildrakizumab: a real world multicenter italian study in psoriasis. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(4):e2023215. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1304a215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Megna M, Ruggiero A, Tommasino N, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL17 treatment: a 28-week real-life study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:1037–1042. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S464326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Dattola A, Bernardini N, Svara F, et al. Effectiveness of tildrakizumab 200 mg: an Italian multicenter study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2420825. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2420825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Di Brizzi EV, Caccavale S, Di Caprio R, et al. A prospective real-life multicenter study of tildrakizumab 200 mg in patients with moderate-severe psoriasis: who is the ideal patient? Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024;14(4):e2024284. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1404a284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Narcisi A, Valenti M, Gargiulo L, et al. Real-life effectiveness of tildrakizumab in chronic plaque psoriasis: a 52-week multicentre retrospective study-IL PSO (Italian landscape psoriasis) J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(1):93–103. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Maul JT, Ak M, Cerminara SE, et al. Tildrakizumab treatment for psoriasis in real-world practice: an analysis from the swiss registry (SDNTT) Acta Derm Venereol. 2024;104:adv40946. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Orsini D, Caldarola G, Dattola A, et al. Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in elderly patients: real-world multicenter study (ESTER – study) J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2319304. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2319304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Bhatia N, Heim J, Schenkel B, Vasquez JG. Quality of life and patient-reported symptoms in a Phase 4, real-world study of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: week 28 interim analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2023;34(1):2200872. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2200872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Cacciapuoti S, Battista T, Potestio L, Scalvenzi M, Megna M, Ruggiero A. The impact of tildrakizumab on quality of life in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 36-week prospective, monocentric, real-life, observational study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025;50:544–550. doi: 10.1093/ced/llae433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Bhatia N, Heim J, Vasquez JG, et al. Long-term quality of life outcomes from a phase 4 study of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a real-world setting. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2310631. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2310631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Drerup KA, Seemann C, Gerdes S, Mrowietz U. Effective and safe treatment of psoriatic disease with the anti-IL-23p19 biologic tildrakizumab: results of a real-world prospective cohort study in nonselected patients. Dermatology. 2022;238(4):615–619. doi: 10.1159/000519924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Augustin M, Sommer R, Daudén E, et al. Patient-reported well-being in value-based care using tildrakizumab in a real-world setting: protocol of a multinational, phase IV, 1-cohort prospective observational study (the POSITIVE study) BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e060536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Otezla: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/it/documents/product-information/otezla-epar-product-information_it.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Papp K, Reich K, Leonardi CL, et al. Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM] 1) J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(1):37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Paul C, Cather J, Gooderham M, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized controlled trial (ESTEEM 2) Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(6):1387–1399. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Stein Gold L, Papp K, Pariser D, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis: results of a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Mrowietz U, Barker J, Conrad C, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with limited skin involvement, plaque psoriasis in special areas and impaired quality of life: results from the EMBRACE randomized trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(2):348–355. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Merola JF, Parish LC, Guenther L, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe genital psoriasis: results from DISCREET, a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(3):485–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Fiorillo L, Becker E, de Lucas R, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 16-week results from SPROUT, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(6):1232–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.11.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Ghislain PD, Lambert J, Lam Hoai XL, et al. Real-life effectiveness of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis in Belgium: results from the observational OTELO study. Adv Ther. 2022;39(2):1068–1080. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01981-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Filippi F, Patrizi A, Iezzi L, et al. Use of apremilast in the psoriasis treatment: a real-life multicenter Italian experience. Ital J Dermatol Venerol. 2022;157(4):313–317. doi: 10.23736/S2784-8671.21.07125-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Malara G, Politi C, Trifirò C, et al. Effectiveness of apremilast in real life in patients with psoriasis: a longitudinal study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021;101(9):adv00545. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Cetkovská P, Dediol I, Šola M, et al. Apremilast use in severe psoriasis: real-world data from Central and Eastern Europe. Adv Ther. 2023;40(4):1787–1802. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02468-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.van den Reek JMPA, van der Leest RJT, Thomas SE, et al. Improved quality of life in patients with psoriasis receiving apremilast: real-world data from the Netherlands. Adv Ther. 2024;41(4):1594–1605. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02759-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Podevin P, Cottencin AC, Becquart C, et al. Real-life use of apremilast for the treatment of psoriasis in patients with oncological comorbidities: a retrospective descriptive multicentre study in France. Eur J Dermatol. 2023;33(1):34–40. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2023.4407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Potestio L, Tommasino N, Lauletta G, et al. Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib for the management of psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024;23(6):677–685. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2351462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Abduelmula A, Gooderham MJ. TYK2 inhibition: changing the treatment landscape for psoriasis? Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18(3):185–187. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2008240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Armstrong AW, Gooderham M, Warren RB, et al. Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(1):29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Imafuku S, Tada Y, Hippeli L, Banerjee S, Morita A, Ohtsuki M. Efficacy and safety of the selective TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global phase 3 trial. J Dermatol. 2023;50(5):588–595. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Strober B, Thaçi D, Sofen H, et al. Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 program for evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor psoriasis second trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(1):40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.08.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Zhang J, Ding Y, Wang P, et al. Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients from China mainland, Taiwan, and South Korea with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2025;192:402–409. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Tada Y, Armstrong AW, Imafuku S, et al. Deucravacitinib in Japanese patients with plaque, generalized pustular, or erythrodermic psoriasis: patient-reported outcomes in the POETYK PSO-4 study. J Dermatol. 2024 doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Squibb Bristol Myers. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Sotyktu (deucravacitinib) long-term data demonstrate durable efficacy and consistent safety for up to three years in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [media release] 2023 http://news.bms.com/news/details/2023/Sotyktu-deucravacitinib-Long-Term-Data-Demonstrate-Durable-Efficacy-and-Consistent-Safety-for-up-to-Three-Years-in-Moderate-to-Severe-Plaque-Psoriasis/default.aspx . [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Armstrong AW, Lebwohl M, Warren RB, et al. Deucravacitinib in plaque psoriasis: four-year safety and efficacy results from the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2 and long-term extension trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025;39(7):1336–1351. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Merola JF, Mease PJ, Armstrong AW, et al. Deucravacitinib in patients with plaque psoriasis who screened positive for psoriatic arthritis: improvements in joint pain and the impact of musculoskeletal symptoms. Dermatol Ther. 2025;15(8):2281–2293. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01428-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Hagino T, Saeki H, Fujimoto E, Kanda N. Long-term effectiveness and safety of deucravacitinib in psoriasis: a 52-week real-world study of genital, scalp, and nail lesions. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025;50:952–959. doi: 10.1093/ced/llae530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Hagino T, Saeki H, Fujimoto E, Kanda N. Effectiveness and safety of deucravacitinib treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in real-world clinical practice in Japan. J Dermatolog Treat. 2024;35(1):2307489. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2307489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Tran V, Wong C, Lee S, Rodrigues M. Acneiform eruption secondary to deucravacitinib: a case series and review of the literature. Australas J Dermatol. 2025;66(3):157–161. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Hagino T, Saeki H, Fujimoto E, Kanda N. Long-term real-world effectiveness of deucravacitinib in psoriasis: a 52-week prospective study stratified by prior apremilast or biologic therapy. J Dermatol. 2025;52(4):634–641. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Tang JT, Xu MY, Wu NH, Wu F, Liu YQ. Rapid clinical improvement with tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor deucravacitinib in overlapping psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol. 2025;64(7):1270–1273. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Zeng J, Li M, Zhao Q, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of RORγt for Th17 regulation in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. J Pharm Anal. 2023;13(6):545–562. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Tang L, Yang X, Liang Y, Xie H, Dai Z, Zheng G. Transcription factor retinoid-related orphan receptor γt: a promising target for the treatment of psoriasis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1210. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Pandya VB, Kumar S, Sachchidanand, Sharma R, Desai RC. Combating autoimmune diseases with retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor-γ (RORγ or RORc) inhibitors: hits and misses. J Med Chem. 2018;61(24):10976–10995. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Zeng J, Li M, Zhao Q, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of RORγt for Th17 regulation in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. J Pharm Anal. 2023;13(6):545–562. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2023.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Zanin-Zhorov A, Weiss JM, Trzeciak A, et al. Cutting edge: selective oral ROCK2 inhibitor reduces clinical scores in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and normalizes skin pathology via concurrent regulation of IL-17 and IL-10. J Immunol. 2017;198(10):3809–3814. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Blauvelt A, Kimball AB, Augustin M, et al. Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in psoriasis: results from a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal, phase III trial (OASIS-1) Br J Dermatol. 2022;187(6):866–877. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Mirikizumab: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/omvoh-epar-product-information_en.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Papp K, Warren RB, Green L, et al. Safety and efficacy of mirikizumab versus secukinumab and placebo in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (OASIS-2): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(9):e542–e552. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00120-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Di Lernia V, Casanova DM, Ricci C. Apremilast in patients with history of malignancy: a real-life, single-center experience. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60(1):e22–e24. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Li L, Wu Z, Wu M, et al. IBI112, a selective anti-IL23p19 monoclonal antibody, displays high efficacy in IL-23-induced psoriasiform dermatitis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;89(Pt B):107008. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.He J, Du W, Yang H, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of IBI112, an IL-23 monoclonal antibody, in Chinese healthy volunteers: a first-in-human phase 1 study. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2023;32(7):669–675. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2023.2230122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];IBI112 in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Re-treatment. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06049810?intr=IBI112&rank=1 . [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Ferris LK, Bagel J, Huang YH, et al. FRONTIER-2: a phase 2b, long-term extension, dose-ranging study of oral JNJ-77242113 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;92(3):495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.10.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.National Library of Medicine. A study of JNJ-77242113 in adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-LEAD) [Accessed September 10, 2025]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06095115?term=ICONIC-LEAD&rank=5 .
  • 266.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];A study of JNJ-77242113 for the treatment of participants with plaque psoriasis involving special areas (scalp, genital, and/or palms of the hands and the soles of the feet) (ICONIC-TOTAL) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06095102 . [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Madonna S, Girolomoni G, Dinarello CA, Albanesi C. The significance of IL-36 hyperactivation and IL-36R targeting in psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3318. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Sachen KL, Arnold Greving CN, Towne JE. Role of IL-36 cytokines in psoriasis and other inflammatory skin conditions. Cytokine. 2022;156:155897. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2022.155897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Hussain S, Berki DM, Choon SE, et al. IL36RN mutations define a severe autoinflammatory phenotype of generalized pustular psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:1067–1070e1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Todorović V, Su Z, Putman CB, et al. Small molecule IL-36γ antagonist as a novel therapeutic approach for plaque psoriasis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45626-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Ali F, Smith CH, Mahil SK. Spesolimab in the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis: a critically appraised research paper. Br J Dermatol. 2023;188:328–329. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.National Library of Medicine. A study to test whether BI 655130 (spesolimab) prevents flare-ups in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis. [Accessed March 20, 2025]. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399837 .
  • 273.Cardenas-de la Garza JA, Dominguez-Chapa E, Garza-Elizondo AK, et al. Treatment with spesolimab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: a review of real-world experience. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025;50(9):1733–1740. doi: 10.1093/ced/llaf238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Warren RB, Reich A, Kaszuba A, et al. Imsidolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis: results from the phase II GALLOP trial. Br J Dermatol. 2023;189(2):161–169. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Vilaça J, Yilmaz O, Torres T. New and emerging treatments for generalized pustular psoriasis: focus on IL-36 receptor inhibitors. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(7):908. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Krueger JG, McInnes IB, Blauvelt A. Tyrosine kinase 2 and Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling and inhibition in plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];A Study Comparing Zasocitinib (TAK-279) With Deucravacitinib in Adults With Plaque Psoriasis. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06973291 . [Google Scholar]
  • 278.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];A Study About How Well TAK-279 Works and Its Safety in Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis During 52 Weeks of Treatment. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06088043 . [Google Scholar]
  • 279.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];Study About How Well TAK-279 Works and Its Safety in Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis During 60 Weeks of Treatment With a Withdrawal and Retreatment Period. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06108544 . [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Leit S, Greenwood J, Carriero S, et al. Discovery of a potent and selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor: TAK-279. J Med Chem. 2023;66(15):10473–10496. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Takeda Announces Positive Results in Phase 2b Study of Investigational TAK-279, an Oral, Once-Daily TYK2 Inhibitor, in People with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Takeda Pharmaceuticals. [Accessed March 20, 2025]. [Accessed March 20, 2025]. https://www.takeda.com/newsroom/newsreleases/2023/takeda-announces-positive-results-in-phase-2b-study-of-investigational-tak-279/
  • 282.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];VTX958 Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis (Serenity PsO) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05655299?intr=VTX958&rank=3&tab=history . [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Bank P. Ventyx Biosciences announces results from the phase 2 trial of VTX958 in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and provides corporate update. [Accessed March 20, 2025];Ventyx Biosciences. https://ir.ventyxbio.com/news-releases/news-release-details/ventyx-biosciences-announces-results-phase-2-trial-vtx958/ [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Berekmeri A, Mahmood F, Wittmann M, et al. Tofacitinib for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Expert Rev ClinImmunol. 2018;14(9):719–730. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1512404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Yatsuzuka K, Muto J, Kohri N, Yoshida S, Shiraishi K, Fujisawa Y. The use of upadacitinib to successfully treat eczematized psoriasis. Int J Dermatol. 2024 doi: 10.1111/ijd.17528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Ibba L, Gargiulo L, Vignoli CA, et al. Practical use of upadacitinib in patients with severe atopic dermatitis in a real-world setting: a systematic review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024;17:593–604. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S329442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Megna M, Potestio L, Ruggiero A, et al. JAK inhibitors in psoriatic disease. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023;16:3129–3145. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S433367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Caiazzo G, Caiazzo A, Napolitano M, et al. The use of JAK/STAT inhibitors in chronic inflammatory disorders. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):2865. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Drakos A, Torres T, Vender R. Emerging oral therapies for the treatment of psoriasis: a review of pipeline agents. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(1):111. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.National Library of Medicine. A Phase2 Study of Jaktinib in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis (PSO) [Accessed September 10, 2025]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04612699 .
  • 291.Ucpinar S, Kwan JK, Hoffman JD, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the oral allosteric TYK2 inhibitor ESK-001 using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. Clin Transl Sci. 2024;17(12):e70094. doi: 10.1111/cts.70094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Blauvelt A, Arenberger P, Sauder MB, et al. Highly selective, allosteric inhibition of TYK2 with oral ESK-001 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from STRIDE, a 12-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.National Library of Medicine. Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of ESK-001 in Plaque Psoriasis. [Accessed September 10, 2025]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05739435 .
  • 294.National Library of Medicine. A Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of BMS-986322 in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis. [Accessed September 10, 2025]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05730725 .
  • 295.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];Safety Study of BMS-986202 in Healthy Subjects and to Treat Psoriasis. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02763969 . [Google Scholar]
  • 296.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed September 10, 2025];The Efficacy and Safety of TLL018 in Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05772520 . [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Warren RB, Strober B, Silverberg JI, et al. Oral orismilast: efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe psoriasis and development of modified release tablets. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(4):711–720. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Warren RB, French LE, Blauvelt A, et al. Orismilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: efficacy and safety from a 16-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, and phase 2b trial (IASOS) J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(3):494–503. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed April 22, 2024];Efficacy and safety study of Hemay005 in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04102241 . [Google Scholar]
  • 300.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed April 22, 2024];A phase III efficacy and safety study of Hemay005 in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04839328 . [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Gyldenløve M, Meteran H, Sørensen JA, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral roflumilast for moderate-to-severe psoriasis-a randomized controlled trial (PSORRO) Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;30:100639. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. Meiji Seika Pharma presents positive findings from phase II study of ME3183, novel highly-potent selective PDE4 inhibitor, in patients with plaque psoriasis at EADV Congress 2023. [Accessed April 22, 2024]. https://www.meiji.com/global/news/2023/pdf/231013_01.pdf .
  • 303.GlobeNewswire. [Accessed April 22, 2024];DICE therapeutics announces positive topline data from phase 1 clinical trial of lead oral IL-17 antagonist, DC-806, for psoriasis. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/10/11/2531642/0/en/DICE-Therapeutics-Announces-Positive-Topline-Data-from-Phase-1-Clinical-Trial-of-Lead-Oral-IL-17-Antagonist-DC-806-for-Psoriasis.html . [Google Scholar]
  • 304.National Library of Medicine. A study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DC-806 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (Illuminate) [Accessed April 22, 2024]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05896527 .
  • 305.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed May 21, 2024];A study to evaluate safety, tolerability of LY4100511 (DC-853) in healthy Asian and non-Asian participants. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06311656 . [Google Scholar]
  • 306.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed April 22, 2024];A single and multiple ascending-dose trial of LEO 153339 in healthy adults. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04883333 . [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Yilmaz O, Pinto JP, Torres T. New and emerging oral therapies for psoriasis. Drugs Context. 2024;13:2024–5-6. doi: 10.7573/dic.2024-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.David M, Akerman L, Ziv M, et al. Treatment of plaque-type psoriasis with oral CF101: data from an exploratory randomized phase 2 clinical trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(3):361–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.David M, Gospodinov DK, Gheorghe N, et al. Treatment of plaque-type psoriasis with oral CF101: data from a phase II/III multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(8):931–938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed April 27, 2024];CF101 therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03168256 . [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. [Accessed April 27, 2024];Sun Pharma announces initiation of phase 2 clinical trial of SCD-044 in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. https://sunpharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Press-Release-Initiation-of-Phase-2-clinical-trial-of-SCD-044.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 312.National Library of Medicine. [Accessed April 27, 2024];To assess the effect of SCD-044 treatment on moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (SOLARES-PsO-1) https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04566666 . [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Hansen RS, Thuesen KKH, Bregnhøj A, et al. The HSP90 inhibitor RGRN-305 exhibits strong immunomodulatory effects in human keratinocytes. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30:773–781. doi: 10.1111/exd.14302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Bregnhøj A, Thuesen KKH, Emmanuel T, et al. HSP90 inhibitor RGRN-305 for oral treatment of plaque-type psoriasis: efficacy, safety and biomarker results in an open-label proof-of-concept study. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186:861–874. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Itano A, Maslin D, Ramani K, et al. Clinical translation of anti-inflammatory effects of Prevotella histicola in TH1, TH2, and TH17 inflammation. Front Med. 2023;10:1070433. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1070433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.National Library of Medicine. A Phase 2 Study Investigating the Effect of EDP 1815 in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis. [Accessed April 27, 2024]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04603027 .

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

dic.2025-8-4-PLS.pdf (83.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.


Articles from Drugs in Context are provided here courtesy of BioExcel Publishing Ltd

RESOURCES