Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov;25(21):9427–9434. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9427-9434.2005

TABLE 2.

Genetic interactions with cbp-1(ku258)a

Genotypeb Muv (%) (n) Induction (n) Vul (%) (n) Egl (%) (n) Sterility (%) (n)
Wild type (N2) 0 (many) 3.0 (29) 0 (29) 0 (many) 0 (many)
cbp-1(ku258) 0 (233) 2.94 (40) 8 (40) 8 (53) 19 (65)
lin-1(e1275 ts) 88 (357) 4.65 (31) 0 (31) 53 (36) 12 (41)
cbp-1(ku258); lin-1(e1275 ts) 39 (492)e NDc NDc 100 (34) 24 (45)
lin-31(n301 lf) 86 (314) NDd 33 (21) 21 (33) 0 (33)
lin-31(n301 lf); cbp-1(ku258) 83 (197) NDd 40 (22) 39 (36) 36 (56)
lin-1(n2515 gf) 0 (131) 2.97 (27) 4 (27) 11 (36) 0 (36)
lin-1(n2515 gf); cbp-1(ku258) 1 (212) 2.43 (25) 56 (25) 79 (28) 24 (37)
sur-6(ku123 lf) 0 (117) 2.97 (26) 2 (26) 6 (34) 0 (34)
sur-6(ku123 lf); cbp-1(ku258) 0 (129) 2.91 (21) 10 (21) 10 (31) 11 (35)
pry-1(mu38) 20°C 21 (106) 3.21 (14) 0 (14) ND ND
pry-1(mu38); cbp-1(ku258) 20°C 8 (127)e 3.09 (22) 5 (22) ND ND
pry-1(mu38) 15°C 64 (108) 3.96 (19) 0 (19) ND ND
pry-1(mu38); cbp-1(ku258) 15°C 19 (108)e 3.18 (18) 0 (18) ND ND
huls1 + HS 66 (76) 4.53 (15) 0 (15) ND ND
cbp-1(ku258); huls1 + HS 65 (78) 4.32 (18) 0 (18) ND ND
lin-15(n765 ts) 100 (343) 5.82 (24) 0 (24) 13 (32) 3 (33)
cbp-1(ku258); lin-15(n765 ts) 98 (229) 5.67 (12) 0 (12) 19 (26) 30 (37)
a

Unless otherwise indicated, all strains were grown at 20°C. Phenotypic definitions are as defined in Table 1, footnotes c to g. See Gleason et al. (14) for a detailed description of huls1 and heat shock conditions used. The number of animals scored (n) is indicated in parentheses. ND, not determined.

b

gf indicates gain of function. lf indicates loss of function. ts indicates temperature sensitive. lin-1(n2515) was linked to unc-17(e113) in these strains, and sur-6(ku123 lf) was linked to unc-29(e403) in these strains. huIs1 contains a gain-of-function mutation in bar-1 under the control of a heat shock promoter (hs::delNTbar-1).

c

Abnormal morphology and location of the VPCs and their descendants made accurate scoring of induction difficult.

d

The presence of extra VPCs as well as an abnormal morphology and location of the VPCs and their descendents made accurate scoring of induction difficult.

e

Significantly different from the value for single-mutant controls (P < 0.01 by Fisher's exact test).