Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct;71(10):5759–5764. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.5759-5764.2005

TABLE 1.

Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in artificially and naturally contaminated chicken samples

Sample type Cell concentration ± SDe (CFU/ml), as determined by:
Selective plate countsa Flotation and real-time PCRb
Spiked 2.6 × 107 ± 5.6 × 106 1.3 × 107 ± 1.5 × 106
2.6 × 106 ± 5.6 × 105 1.4 × 106 ± 1.3 × 105
2.6 × 105 ± 5.6 × 104 1.9 × 105 ± 3.3 × 104
2.6 × 104 ± 5.6 × 103 1.9 × 104 ± 0.8 × 103
2.6 × 103 ± 5.6 × 102 3.5 × 103 ± 1.8 × 102
Naturally contaminated 0.0c 0.0c
1.0 × 104 ± 7.1 × 102 1.3 × 104 ± 1.2 × 103
2.8 × 106 ± 4.2 × 105 1.1 × 106 ± 4.1 × 105
8.6 × 102 ± 8.5 × 101 2.8 × 102 ± 0.8 × 102d
a

Chicken rinse samples were plated on Preston agar and counted to acquire initial cell counts.

b

Real-time PCR measurements were calculated from a standard curve made for cells instead of DNA, since no DNA was purified after flotation. The standard curve had a linear range of amplification from 2.6 × 107 until 2.6 × 103 and was described by the equation y = −3.673x + 46.285 (R2 = 0.9944).

c

A total of 27 unspiked samples did not contain any Campylobacter spp. as determined by both methods.

d

This sample fell outside the linear range of amplification but was quantified by extrapolation of the standard curve.

e

Data are from independent triplicate measurements.