TABLE 2.
Humic isolate no. | Treatment | Avg ± SE value
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Respiration (μg C liter−1 h−1) | BCP (μg C liter−1 h−1) | BGEa (%) | C utilizationa (μg C liter−1 h−1) | ||
3 | Dark | 7.3 ± 0.1b | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 20.6 ± 2.3b | 9.3 ± 0.3b |
UV | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 26.2 ± 1.8 | 13.3 ± 0.4 | |
10 | Dark | 8.8 ± 0.2b | 4.1 ± 0.3b | 31.8 ± 0.9 | 13.0 ± 0.2b |
UV | 9.8 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 33.8 ± 1.1 | 14.9 ± 0.2 | |
11 | Dark | 8.0 ± 0.2b | 1.7 ± 0.2b | 17.6 ± 0.9b | 9.7 ± 0.1b |
UV | 8.9 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 26.7 ± 1.0 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | |
12 | Dark | 7.4 ± 0.1b | 1.9 ± 0.2b | 20.1 ± 0.8b | 9.2 ± 0.1b |
UV | 8.6 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 2.0 | 12.2 ± 0.5 | |
Avg | Dark | 7.9 ± 0.4c | 2.4 ± 0.6c | 22.6 ± 3.2c | 10.3 ± 0.9c |
UV | 9.3 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 28.8 ± 1.7 | 13.1 ± 0.7 | |
Avg enhancement (% relative to dark) | 18 ± 5c | 71 ± 16c | 32 ± 10c | 29 ± 6c |
BGE and carbon utilization are averages of all possible combinations between the independent measurements of respiration and production (i.e., n = 3 for bacterial production and respiration and n = 9 for BGE and carbon utilization). The average percent enhancement was calculated as [(irradiated−dark)/dark] × 100 ± standard error (n = 4). The numerical identification of the humic isolates is given in Table 1.
Indicates statistically significant differences between dark and UV treatments (t test for BCP and respiration and U test for BGE and carbon utilization, P < 0.05).
Indicates statically significant differences in average values and enhancement (paired t test, P < 0.05).