Table 4.
For the BraTs dataset, comparison of different multi-modal fusion methods in the image domain.
| Domain | Fusion method | T2WI (4×) | T1WI (Low-field) | T2WI (4×, Low-field) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSNR ↑ | SSIM ↑ | PSNR ↑ | SSIM ↑ | PSNR ↑ | SSIM ↑ | ||
| Single Domain | Raw input | 30.04±1.51 | 0.748±0.034 | 22.27±2.08 | 0.226±0.020 | 25.39±1.15 | 0.217±0.017 |
| Concatenation | 38.12±1.66 | 0.976±0.006 | 37.03±2.02 | 0.961±0.004 | 34.92±1.48 | 0.959±0.010 | |
| w/o dilated window | 38.34±1.67 | 0.977±0.006 | 37.40±2.03 | 0.967±0.007 | 35.23±1.53 | 0.960±0.010 | |
| w/o deep-level HWAF | 39.35±1.70 | 0.981±0.007 | 37.46±2.02 | 0.968±0.007 | 35.32±1.52 | 0.961±0.009 | |
| Ours | 39.95±1.72 | 0.982±0.005 | 37.52±2.03 | 0.968±0.007 | 35.57±1.53 | 0.962±0.009 | |
|
| |||||||
| Dual Domain | K-space refined input | 35.45±1.60 | 0.957±0.008 | 36.68±1.87 | 0.956±0.009 | 33.37±1.45 | 0.937±0.026 |
| Concatenation | 38.26±1.69 | 0.976±0.006 | 38.85±1.93 | 0.975±0.005 | 35.86±1.52 | 0.964±0.008 | |
| w/o dilated window | 38.56±1.67 | 0.978±0.006 | 39.09±1.92 | 0.977±0.005 | 36.04±1.54 | 0.965±0.008 | |
| w/o deep-level HWAF | 39.56±1.70 | 0.981±0.007 | 39.10±1.92 | 0.977±0.005 | 36.13±1.53 | 0.966±0.014 | |
| Ours | 40.25±1.71 | 0.983±0.005 | 39.21±1.93 | 0.977±0.005 | 36.55±1.54 | 0.968±0.008 | |