Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 2;25:493. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04529-2

Table 4.

Comparison of safety outcomes between patients treated with rt-PA and patients treated with TNK

Overall (n = 139) All patients (n = 139) rt-PA group (n = 65) TNK group (n = 74) p-value
Any ICH within 24 h (n (%)) 17 (12.2) 7 (10.8) 10 (13.5) 0.601
sICH (n (%)) 6 (4.3) 1 (1.5) 5 (6.8) 0.213
Parenchymal hematoma (PH 2) 3 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 3 (4.1) 0.248
Death by day 7 (n (%)) 9 (6.5) 2 (3.1) 7 (9.5) 0.172
Subgroup of patients with EVT ( n  = 41) ( n  = 41) ( n  = 24) ( n  = 17)
Any ICH within 24 h (n (%)) 10 (24.4) 5 (20.8) 5 (29.4) 0.529
sICH (n (%)) 4 (9.8) 1 (4.2) 3 (17.6) 0.290
Parenchymal hematoma (PH 2) 2 (4.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (11.8) 0.455
Death by day 7 (n (%)) 4 (9.8) 1 (4.2) 3 (17.6) 0.290
Subgroup of patients with EVT ( n  = 98) ( n  = 98) ( n  = 41) ( n  = 57)
Any ICH within 24 h (n (%)) 7 (7.1) 2 (4.9) 5 (8.8) 0.695
sICH (n (%)) 2 (2.1) 0 (0.0) 2 (3.6) 0.507
Parenchymal hematoma (PH 2) 1 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.8) 1.000
Death by day 7 (n (%)) 5 (5.1) 1 (2.4) 4 (7.0) 0.393

rt-PA Alteplase, TNK Tenecteplase, (s)ICH (symptomatic) intracerebral hemorrhage,  EVT  Endovascular thrombectomy

Numbers written in bold indicate statistically significant group comparisons