Skip to main content
. 2002 Feb;68(2):569–575. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.569-575.2002

TABLE 1.

Surface water samples that tested positive for Cryptosporidium spp.

Sample (date)a Location Sample identification MDCb Molecular results
Nested PCR NdeI digestc Sequence resultsd
3/1/99 Brook SF SF NDe + 3/C. muris
7/12/99 Quinapoxet River QR + + 3/C. muris
2/1/00 Stillwater River SR ND + 1/+ 1/C. parvum
11/− 2/C. muris
2/22/00 Quinapoxet River +
3/7/00 Quinapoxet River + ND
4/3/00 Quinapoxet River + ND
4/4/00 Gates Brook GB ND + 11/− 5/C. parvum
4/4/00 Brook JF ND + QNSf QNSf
10/23/00 Stillwater River + ND
11/7/00 Quinapoxet River QR1.5, QR2 + 6/− 2/C. parvum
12/5/00 Stillwater River SR1.5, SR2 + 10/− 6/C. baileyi
12/5/00 Quinapoxet River +
a

That is, month/day/year.

b

Results of MDC samples processed by IFA: +, presumptive positive for C. parvum; −, not found.

c

1/+, One nested PCR clone was cut with NdeI; 11/−, eleven nested PCR clones were not cut with NdeI. For samples 3/1/99 and 7/12/99, the complete nested-PCR products were not cut with NdeI (the nested-PCR clones were not digested individually).

d

3/C. muris, the nucleotide sequences of three nested-PCR clones were most closely related to those of C. muris.

e

ND, not done.

f

QNS, quantity not sufficient.