ABSTRACT
Background
Essential (EAA) and branched chain (BCAA) amino acid ingestion support whole-body anabolism after resistance exercise and can attenuate markers of postexercise myofibrillar protein breakdown (i.e. urinary 3-methylhistidine; 3MH). Leucine is often considered a primary anabolic EAA through its ability to activate the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and stimulate muscle protein synthesis. The dipeptide leucine (dileucine) has been shown to more effectively stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis than leucine in young males at rest. Therefore, we aimed to determine the effect of a dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula (DIEAA; 2 g dileucine, 1 g leucine, 9.15 g total EAA) on the anabolic and catabolic responses following resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults when compared with ingesting branched chain amino acids (BCAA; 3 g leucine, 1.5 g isoleucine, 1.5 g valine) or isonitrogenous (to DIEAA) collagen hydrolysate (COL).
Methods
In a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, 12 healthy adults (8 M, 4F, aged 24 ± 3 y) performed a 60 min bout of whole-body resistance exercise, after which they ingested DIEAA, BCAA, or COL protein beverages containing 100 mg L-[1-13C]leucine (#NCT05754125). Total exogenous leucine retention (as an estimate of whole-body anabolism) was assessed over the 6 h postprandial period by determining total leucine oxidation from 13CO2 enrichment (isotope ratio mass spectrometry) in repeated breath samples. A urinary 3MH:creatinine ratio (3MH:Cr) over 6 h was used as an estimate of skeletal muscle myofibrillar protein breakdown. To further assess the anabolic potential of nutrients, C2C12 myotubes were treated with a subset (n = 7) of human serum-conditioned media for 4 h to measure downstream mTORC1 substrate phosphorylation, protein synthesis (puromycin and L-ring-[D5]phenylalanine incorporation) and breakdown (ubiquitinated protein), and myotube hypertrophy.
Results
Total exogenous leucine retention were similar (p = 0.68) between DIEAA (215.72 ± 42.45 μmol·kg−1) and BCAA conditions (219.15 ± 45.26 μmol·kg−1), with both DIEAA and BCAA being greater (p < 0.0001) than COL (37.25 ± 8.16 μmol·kg−1). There were no differences (p = 0.58) in 3MH:Cr between supplement conditions. There was no effect of condition ex vivo on puromycin incorporation into nascent peptides (p = 0.31), total protein ubiquitination as an estimate of protein breakdown (p = 0.59), phosphorylation of downstream mTORC1 substrates p-RPS6S240/244 (p = 0.39) or p-4E-BP1T37/46 (p = 0.50), and myotube diameter (p = 0.55). Stable isotope-derived rates of mixed muscle protein synthesis (MPS) demonstrated a trend toward a main effect (p = 0.086) with pairwise comparisons revealing a large effect of DIEAA compared to COL (dz = 1.47), a medium effect of DIEAA compared to BCAA (dz = 0.81), and a trivial effect of BCAA comapred to COL (dz = 0.002).
Conclusions
Dileucine-supplemented EAA and BCAA support greater whole-body anabolism compared with COL after resistance exercise independent of attenuation in urinary estimates of myofibrillar protein breakdown. Exploratory ex vivo experiments reveal a potential anabolic effect of DIEAA in stimulating MPS. Collectively, these findings suggest that consuming dileucine with sufficient EAA and BCAA increases exogenous leucine retention to support whole-body anabolism during postexercise recovery in individuals performing resistance training.
KEYWORDS: Dileucine, essential amino acids, supplementation, resistance training, whole-body anabolism
1. Introduction
Dietary amino acids provide substrates for the synthesis of muscle and whole-body proteins [1–3]. The postexercise consumption of essential amino acids (EAA) has long been known to support a positive net muscle and whole-body net protein balance through their ability to support greater rates of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and attenuate the exercise-induced stimulation of muscle protein breakdown [4,5]. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), especially leucine, have been shown to be potent stimulators of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway [6,7] and the MPS in humans at rest [8,9] and after resistance exercise [10,11]. We have previously shown that the anabolic effects of EAA and BCAA are evident at the whole-body level, with their postexercise ingestion resulting in greater utilization of dietary leucine for the synthesis of whole-body proteins to support postexercise recovery while attenuating markers of myofibrillar catabolism [12]. Interestingly, it was recently demonstrated that the ingestion of the di-peptide dileucine elevated plasma leucine and dileucine concentrations and stimulated a greater increase in resting myofibrillar protein synthesis than did an equivalent amount of leucine [13], suggesting a potential role for bioactive peptides in the regulation of protein synthesis in humans. However, the ability of dileucine to support postexercise anabolism has yet to be determined in humans.
The measurement of muscle protein breakdown is technically and logistically challenging during the postprandial period and can be prohibitively invasive [14]. Thus, less is known about the nutritional regulation of muscle protein breakdown in humans during the postexercise recovery period. However, the methylation of histidine is a posttranslational modification of this amino acid for mature actin/myosin protein, generating 3-methylhistidine (3MH), which has been used historically [15] and recently [16] as a biomarker for myofibrillar protein breakdown. We [12] and others [17,18] have shown that EAA ingestion after exercise can lower urinary 3MH levels, suggesting attenuation of myofibrillar protein breakdown. Alternatively, providing only BCAA did not attenuate postexercise 3MH [12], suggesting that the previously observed BCAA-induced stimulation of muscle protein synthesis may need to be supported by a reciprocal increase in muscle protein breakdown to provide the necessary amino acid precursors, as previously suggested [19]. Therefore, nutritional strategies that enhance anabolism and attenuate (muscle) catabolism may represent effective means to support recovery from resistance exercise.
To further examine the mechanisms of MPS without the invasive use of muscle biopsies, an in vitro model using ex vivo human serum has been developed [20]. As human serum reflects the integrated systemic response to different nutritional and exercise conditions, it has been proposed that coculturing myotubes with ex vivo human serum may increase the physiological relevance of cell culture models [21]. Previous work has demonstrated that media conditioned with whey protein hydrolysate-fed serum elicited greater MPS and anabolic signaling compared to isonitrogenous non-essential amino acid-fed serum did [22], highlighting the ability of the ex vivo model to differentiate anabolic responses between dietary protein formulations that have been shown in vivo [23]. Therefore, by collecting blood samples in the postabsorptive and postprandial states, the ex vivo cell model may elucidate the mechanisms by which dileucine ingestion can support muscle anabolism compared with an equal amount of leucine ingestion [13].
The overarching objective of the current study was to investigate the anabolic and catabolic response to the ingestion of a dileucine-containing EAA formula (DIEAA) compared with branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) and an isonitrogenous nonessential amino acid collagen (COL) control in young healthy adults. Based on our previous observation of an attenuation in 3MH with EAA compared to BCAA ingestion after exercise [12], our primary objective was to determine whether an EAA formulation enriched with dileucine reduced urinary 3MH compared to BCAA and COL. Furthermore, using our noninvasive oral leucine tracer model [24], we aimed to determine whether leucine retention (as a proxy for whole-body protein synthesis) was enhanced by the ingestion of EAA in DIEAA or BCAA compared to a primarily nonessential amino acid-based COL protein control. Finally, as an exploratory arm, we aimed to determine the impact of postexercise amino acid ingestion on intracellular signaling, muscle protein synthesis and breakdown, and hypertrophy in C2C12 myotubes conditioned with postprandial serum ex vivo. We hypothesized that urinary 3MH would be lowest in DIEAA and that leucine retention would be greater in DIEAA compared with BCAA and COL. We also hypothesized that the ex vivo cell model would show enhanced anabolic signaling, puromycin incorporation, and cellular hypertrophy in DIEAA compared with BCAA and COL.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants and ethics approval
Twelve healthy adults (8 M, 4F; Table 1) provided informed written consent after being informed of the study purpose, protocols, and risks. Participants were recruited through postings at the University of Toronto and were deemed eligible to participate if they were (i) recreationally active (i.e. performed structured exercise ≥2× per week for the previous 6 months); (ii) considered physically fit to perform strength tests based on the responses to a Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire [25] and an International Physical Activity Questionnaire [26]; and (iii) not taking oral contraceptives. Individuals were excluded if they were (i) currently using tobacco products; (ii) currently using or had a history of anabolic steroid use; (iii) unable to abstain from supplement use for ≥3 weeks prior to metabolic trials (e.g. creatine, BCAA); (iv) diagnosed with a medical condition (e.g. type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and cancer); (v) amenorrheic (females only); and (vi) currently using medications known to affect protein metabolism (e.g. statins, prescription anti-inflammatories). The study protocol was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board (#37843). The present study was registered as a clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT05754125).
Table 1.
Participant characteristics.
| Characteristics | Mean SD |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 27.0 4.7 |
| Height (cm) | 172.0 9.8 |
| Body mass (kg) | 72.0 17.5 |
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 58.3 11.7 |
| Body fat (%) | 18.3 6.7 |
| Habitual protein intake (g·kg−1·d−1) | 1.7 0.7 |
| Habitual energy intake (kcal·d−1) | 2103 478 |
2.2. Experimental design
The present study used a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design. All testing procedures and data collection took place at the Goldring Center for High Performance Sport at the University of Toronto. The participants reported to the laboratory ≥4 days prior to the first metabolic trial for baseline testing, which included a body composition assessment and exercise familiarization. The participants were instructed to arrive after a 10-h overnight fast and to avoid ingesting fluids on the morning of the body composition assessment. Participants' fat-free mass was estimated using the Brozek equation [27] by measuring body density via air displacement plethysmography (BOD POD, Cosmed USA Inc., Concord, CA, USA) and body mass with a calibrated weight scale. Following the body composition assessment, participants were provided a carbohydrate beverage containing 1 g CHO·kg−1 body weight (1:1 ratio of maltodextrin and Gatorade powder; PepsiCo, Inc., Harrison, NY, USA) and allowed time to rehydrate (~30 min). The participants were then familiarized with the whole-body resistance exercise protocol and guided through one-repetition maximum (1RM) testing as previously described [28].
2.3. Metabolic trial
Prior to the first metabolic trial, the participants were instructed to record their habitual dietary intake for 72 h using MyFitnessPal (San Francisco, CA, USA). The participants were then instructed to replicate the final 24 h of the diet log on the day before the second and third metabolic trials. The participants were prohibited from engaging in structured physical activity and alcohol for 48 and 24 h, respectively, prior to each trial. Upon arrival, after an overnight fast, baseline (t = −60 min) breath and urine samples were collected in 10 mL Vacutainers (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and spot urine containers, respectively, before participants began the whole-body bout of resistance exercise (described below). An additional baseline breath sample was collected halfway (t = −30 min) through the exercise protocol. Immediately following resistance exercise, an intravenous catheter was inserted into an antecubital vein by a trained phlebotomist, and two baseline serum samples were collected into 10 mL serum separator tube incubators (BD; #367988), alongside a final baseline breath sample. Subsequently, participants ingested the trial supplement (t = 0 min), and breath samples were collected every 20 min for the first 3 h and every 30 min thereafter over a 6-h measurement period. This period was selected as it corresponds with the expected peak concentrations of dileucine and EAA [11,13,24]. During this 6-h period, all urine excreted by participants was collected into a 2 L container from which a representative sample was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Additionally, serum samples were collected at 15 and 30 min of the measurement period for ex vivo screening. Serum samples were allowed to clot at room temperature for 30 min and then centrifuged at 1500 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.
2.4. Resistance exercise protocol
The exercise protocol was designed to target all major muscle groups and has been previously shown to support whole-body anabolism and reduce exercise performance during recovery [29]. The protocol included upper body supersets (two exercises performed consecutively with no dedicated rest between the two exercises) and isolated lower body exercises as follows: 1) bench press and cable row superset; 2) shoulder press and latissimus pulldown supersets; 3) leg press; and 4) knee extension. Following a 5-min warm-up on a cycle ergometer, participants completed four working sets of 8−12 repetitions at 75% 1RM for each exercise with ~90 s of rest between sets. During rest, the participants were asked to provide their rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for the previous set using the Borg CR10 scale [30]. The investigator adjusted the weight throughout the session to ensure that the 8−12 repetition range was met while achieving a high RPE (≥7), close to volitional failure.
2.5. Trial supplements
All three supplements were prepared in powder form and provided by Iovate Health Sciences International (Iovate Health Sciences Inc., Oakville, ON, Canada). The supplement order for each participant was determined by block randomization, and the supplements were provided in a double-blinded fashion. The dileucine-containing EAA supplement (DIEAA) used in the present study contained a total of 9.15 g of EAA, 2 g of which was dileucine and 1 g of which was leucine. The 2 g dileucine was selected because it has previously been shown to support resting myofibrillar protein synthesis [13] as well as training-induced increases in muscle strength [31] to a greater extent than 2 g of leucine does. The additional leucine and EAA doses were provided to approximate the content of 20–25 g of whey protein, which enhances postexercise muscle protein synthesis [32,33]. The branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplement consisted of 3 g of leucine, 1.5 g of isoleucine and 1.5 g of valine to be equivalent to the BCAA content of DIEAA. The placebo supplement (COL) consisted of collagen protein and was designed to be nitrogen-matched to DIEAA but to provide low-EAA control, which would have little effect on muscle protein synthesis [22,23]. All the supplements were enriched by the addition of 100 mg of 99% [1-13C]leucine (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Tewksbury, MA, USA) to measure exogenous leucine oxidation at each time point.
2.6. Analysis of urine samples
The urinary 3MH concentration was measured with a commercially available ELISA kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA). The urine samples were subsequently centrifuged (1000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C). To remove insoluble debris, the supernatant was used for the analysis. To account for sample dilution due to hydration status, urinary 3MH measures were normalized to urinary creatinine [34,35], as measured by a QuantiChrom Creatinine Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA).
2.7. Analysis of breath samples
Breath samples were collected into sterile 10 mL vacutainers and stored at room temperature before analysis of 13CO2 enrichment by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (Compact Science Systems, Newcastle, UK), as previously described [24].
2.8. Calculations
Exogenous leucine oxidation (Exo Ox) was calculated as previously described [24], with the exception that a correction factor for the retention of 13C in the bicarbonate pool was not applied. Total exogenous leucine oxidation (in μmol/kg) over the 6-h postprandial period was calculated using the trapezoidal area under the curve (AUC) of Exo Ox divided by the change in time. As a marker of anabolic sensitivity, total exogenous leucine retention (in μmol/kg) was calculated as the difference between leucine intake and total exogenous leucine oxidation.
2.9. Serum amino acid concentrations
Serum amino acid concentrations for a subset of participants whose serum was used for ex vivo FSR experiments were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS; Thermo Altis Triple Quadrupole, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) as described previously [36]. For each participant, a fasted serum sample was pooled from all three metabolic trials, and three postprandial samples (one for each metabolic trial) were combined with 15- and 30-min serum.
2.10. Ex vivo experiments
C2C12 myoblasts (CRL−1772) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and expanded in growth media consisting of high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; #D5796--500ML, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; #F1051--500ML, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS; #15140122, Gibco) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified environment. Prior to the experiments, the cells were seeded into 6-well tissue culture plates in growth media. Once cells reached >90% confluence, the medium was changed to differentiation media comprised of low-glucose DMEM (#D6046-500ML, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 2% horse serum (#16050122, Gibco) and 1% PS to induce differentiation into myotubes for 5 days. The differentiation media was changed every 48 h, and all experiments were performed prior to passage 10.
After 5 days of differentiation, 24 h after the most recent media were changed, the myotubes were washed once in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS; #D8537--500ML, Sigma-Aldrich) and then starved of amino acids and serum in amino acid-free DMEM (#D9800−13, United States Biological) supplemented with 3.7 g/L sodium bicarbonate (#SOB308, BioShop), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (#11360070; Gibco), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (#2503008; Gibco) for 1 h [37,38]. Following starvation, the cells were refed in amino acid-free DMEM supplemented with 20% (v/v) human serum, pooled with fasted serum from all three metabolic trials, or combined with 15 and 30 min of postprandial serum from each metabolic trial (i.e. 1 starvation and 3 feeding conditions per participant) for 4 h at 37 °C [39]. Puromycin (#PUR333, BioShop) was added dropwise to a concentration of 1 µM for the final 30 min of the refeeding period. At 4 h of refeeding, the plates were placed on an ice block, rinsed twice in ice-cold DPBS and collected in ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 1% Triton-X100; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) supplemented with a 1x protease inhibitor tablet (#11836170001, Roche) and a 1x phosphatase inhibitor tablet (#A32957, Thermo-Scientific) per 10 mL of RIPA buffer. Two wells per condition were pooled, and experiments were repeated in duplicate on separate passages. Lysates were kept on ice for 1 h and then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until processing.
In a separate single experiment using the same conditions, 200 μM L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine (#DLM−1258, Cambridge Isotopes) was added to the refeeding media from a 10 mM stock in DPBS to measure protein synthesis (described below) over the course of the 4 h serum stimulation period. Two wells per condition were pooled, and the lysates were kept on ice for 1 h and then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until processing (described in “Protein Synthesis Analysis” below).
2.11. Myotube diameter experiments
C2C12 myoblasts were seeded into 24-well plates and allowed to proliferate until >90% confluent prior to being differentiated in low glucose differentiation medium. On day 5 of differentiation, the myotubes were starved of amino acids and serum and refed for 4 h, as described above. Following refeeding, the myotubes were washed 1× in ice-cold DPBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature (RT). Fixed cells were rinsed twice in DPBS, permeabilized and blocked in 0.3 M glycine/0.3% Triton X−100/5% normal goat serum (#16210064, Gibco) diluted in DPBS for 60 min. The myotubes were then incubated with anti-Desmin primary antibody (1:100, #D8281, Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.3% Triton X−100/1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in DPBS for 1 h at RT. The myotubes were subsequently rinsed twice in DPBS and incubated with secondary antibody (1:300; Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG H + L; #A−11008, Invitrogen) in 1% BSA/DPBS in the dark. The cells were then rinsed once in DPBS and incubated with DAPI (1:5,000 in PBS; #4083; Cell Signaling Technology) for 5 min in the dark. Finally, the cells were rinsed twice in DPBS, stored in DPBS at 4 °C in the dark overnight and imaged the next day. Images of at least five random fields per condition were taken at 10× magnification using an EVOS FL Auto Cell imaging microscope (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Myotube images were analyzed using ImageJ FIJI (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), where the means of three measurements along the length of each myotube were used to calculate diameter, and an over 100 fibers per condition (range: 100−108 fibers) were analyzed [37,39].
2.12. Immunoblotting
The cell lysates were homogenized on ice using a polytron for 30 s, and then clarified via centrifugation at 8000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (#23227, Thermo Scientific), and the lysates were diluted to equal concentrations with 4X Laemmli sample buffer and RIPA buffer prior to being heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Equal amounts of protein (20 μg) from each sample were loaded onto precast 8%−16% gradient Criterion™ TGX Stain-Free™ gels (#5678105, Bio-Rad) and separated by SDS‒PAGE for ~40 min at 200 V. Protein gels were imaged using Bio-Rad Stain-Free™ technology (45 s activation) as a loading control for normalization to total protein. Proteins were then transferred at 100 V for 1 h onto 0.45 µm nitrocellulose membranes (#1620115, Bio-Rad) using a wet transfer. The membranes were then blocked in 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween−20 (TBST) for 1 h at RT prior to incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were all diluted 1:1000 in TBST with 5% BSA and were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST; Danvers, MA), unless stated otherwise. Antibodies consisted of P-RPS6Ser240/244 (#5364), p-4E-BP1Thr37/46 (#2855), anti-ubiquitin (#3936), and anti-puromycin (1:2000; #MABE343, Millipore). The next day, the membranes were washed in TBST (3 × 5 min) and then incubated with either anti-rabbit (#7074) or anti-mouse (#7076) HRP-conjugated antibodies (both 1:10,000 in TBST) for 1 h at RT. The membranes were then washed in TBST (3 × 5 min), and with Clarity™ Western ECL substrate (#1705061, Bio-Rad), they were imaged using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc imaging system. Bands were quantified using ImageLab software (Bio-Rad), and the Stain-Free image was used to control for potential differences in total protein between lanes.
2.13. Protein synthesis analysis
Lysates from cells treated with L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine were homogenized with a polytron on ice for 30 s. Proteins were precipitated with 1 M PCA and centrifuged at 1500 × g for 15 min. The resulting protein pellet was gently rinsed once in ice-cold 70% ethanol before centrifugation at 1500 g for 15 min, and the ethanol supernatant was discarded. Subsequently, 750 μL of 0.1 M HCl and 750 μL of Dowex resin (#Dowex50W-X8–200; Sigma-Aldrich) in 1 M HCl were added to the protein pellet, and the proteins were hydrolyzed for 36 h at 110 °C before being purified over cation exchange columns constructed from glass wool in 5 mL syringes. Purified amino acids were dried down under a steady stream of nitrogen at 80 °C, resuspended in 0.1% Formic acid, and analyzed at the Analytic Facility for Bioactive Molecules at SickKids (Toronto, Canada) by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) monitored at mass to charge ratios (m/z) of 171.1/125 for L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine and 166.1/131 for natural phenylalanine, as previously described for human skeletal muscle [40].
Fractional synthetic rates (FSR) for a mixed fraction were calculated as previously described [41] using the equation:
where Eincorp is the enrichment of protein-bound L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine, Emedium is the enrichment of the media calculated from serum phenylalanine concentrations (above), adjusted to 20% to account for the volume of serum used during the refeeding period, and t is time (4 h). The FSR is expressed as a percentage per hour.
2.14. Statistical analysis
The primary outcome for the present study was urinary 3MH:Cr (3-methylhistidine to creatinine ratio). An a priori power analysis, with α = 0.05 and 1-β = 0.80, was performed using previous methods [12], which revealed that a sample size of 12 is sufficient to detect a 23% lower postexercise 3MH:Cr concentration following the ingestion of EAA compared with BCAA. The data were analyzed via GraphPad Prism (version 9.3.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), with significance set at P < 0.05. Values were classified as outliers if they exceeded both two standard deviations from the group mean and the 1.5 × IQR bounds. One participant whose serum dileucine concentration met both criteria was excluded from the serum dileucine analysis. The final sample size for serum dileucine analysis was n = 6, as indicated in the figure legend. Urinary 3MH:Cr, serum amino acid concentration AUC, total exogenous leucine oxidation, and total exogenous leucine retention for all conditions were analyzed by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, with Tukey's post hoc correction for multiple comparisons used to identify differences between conditions when there was a main effect. The Exo Ox for all conditions was analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA (condition × time). Where sphericity was violated, a Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied to all main effects and interactions. Where significant effects were identified in the ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc adjustment was performed to determine differences between conditions. Serum from a subset of 7−10 participants was used for ex vivo experiments depending on serum availability and sample hemolysis (see figure descriptions for exact sample sizes). This sample size is in line with previous work using the ex vivo model [20,22,37–39]. Ex vivo outcomes were analyzed by one-way repeated measures ANOVA, with post hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey's HSD correction. Effect size was calculated as Cohen's dz (mean of paired differences divided by the standard deviation of those differences), with thresholds of <0.2 for trivial, 0.2–0.6 for small, 0.6–1.2 for medium, and >1.2 for large. P-values are presented as corrected, exact values, unless less than 0.001. The data are reported as mean ± SD, unless stated otherwise.
3. Results
3.1. Urinary 3-methylhistidine
There were no differences in urinary 3MH:Cr across the supplement conditions (P = 0.584; Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Pooled 8 h urinary 3-methylhistidine (3MH) and creatinine (Cr) were measured via ELISA for each trial. There was no main effect of supplement condition (P = 0.584). Data are expressed as the 3MH:Cr ratio and presented as the means ± SD. COL, Collagen; DIEAA, Dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula; BCAA, Branched-chain amino acids.
3.2. Serum amino acid concentrations
There was a main effect of the supplement condition on serum concentrations of EAA (P = 0.003), BCAA (P < 0.001), non-EAA (P = 0.011), and leucine (P < 0.001). Tukey's post hoc testing revealed that serum concentrations of EAA, BCAA, and leucine were significantly greater in the DIEAA and BCAA conditions compared to both COL and fasted levels, with no differences observed between DIEAA and BCAA (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Serum concentrations of essential amino acids (A; n = 7), branched-chain amino acids (B; n = 7), nonessential amino acids (C; n = 7), leucine (D; n = 7), and dileucine (E; n = 6), expressed as the means ± SD. Data are presented for the fasted state (pooled from all three metabolic trials) and for the combined 15- and 30-min postprandial serum samples from each metabolic trial (COL, DIEAA, BCAA). EAA main effect, P = 0.003. BCAA main effect, P < 0.001. NEAA main effect, P = 0.011. Leucine main effect, P < 0.001. Dileucine main effect, P = 0.011. Conditions that do not share a letter are significantly different (P < 0.05). COL, Collagen; DIEAA, Dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula; BCAA, Branched-chain amino acids.
For the serum dileucine concentrations, there was a trend towards a main effect of supplement condition (P = 0.079). However, after removing a potential outlier (n = 6), the main effect was statistically significant (P = 0.011). As shown in panel E of Figure 2, post hoc testing revealed that dileucine concentrations were significantly greater in the DIEAA condition compared to fasted (P = 0.003) and COL (P = 0.002) conditions. Furthermore, the dileucine concentrations in the BCAA condition were significantly greater compared to COL condition (P = 0.047).
3.3. 13CO2 breath test
There were significant time, condition, and interaction effects for Exo Ox (Figure 3A; all P < 0.0001). Exo Ox was greater in both DIEAA and BCAA compared with COL between t = 20−240 min (P < 0.05), with no difference between DIEAA and BCAA. There was a significant main effect of supplement condition for total exogenous leucine oxidation (P < 0.0001; Figure 3B). Total exogenous leucine oxidation was similar between DIEAA (130.36 ± 48.24 μmol·kg−1) and BCAA (126.93 ± 53.74; P = 0.678), whereas DIEAA and BCAA were both greater than those of COL (7.98 ± 4.51; both P < 0.0001). When expressed as a percentage of the ingested leucine (Figure 3C), total exogenous leucine oxidation was similar between DIEAA (36.94% ± 5.23%) and BCAA (35.84% ± 7.21%; P = 0.583) and greater for DIEAA and BCAA than for COL (16.92% ± 6.92%; both P < 0.001). Leucine retention (leucine intake—total exogenous leucine oxidation; Figure 3D) was similar between DIEAA (215.72 ± 42.45 μmol·kg−1) and BCAA (219.15 ± 45.26; P = 0.678) and greater in DIEAA and BCAA compared with COL (37.35 ± 8.16; both P < 0.0001).
Figure 3.
Exogenous leucine oxidation over the 6 h postprandial period (A), where #denotes a significant difference between DIEAA and COL and *denotes a significant difference between BCAA and COL. Total exogenous leucine oxidation is expressed as the area under the curve (B) or the percentage of total leucine intake (C). Total exogenous leucine letention area under the curve (D). P < 0.0001 for all main effects of condition, time, or conditiontime interaction. The conditions that do not share a letter are significantly different (P < 0.0001). COL, Collagen; DIEAA, Dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula; BCAA, Branched-chain amino acids.
3.4. Ex vivo serum does not influence protein ubiquitination, or markers of cell anabolism
There was no effect of supplement condition ex vivo on puromycin incorporation into nascent peptides (P = 0.31; Figure 4A) or total protein ubiquitination (P = 0.59; Figure 4B), as determined by immunoblot. There was no effect of condition on the phosphorylation of the downstream mTORC1 substrates P-RPS6S240/244 (P = 0.39; Figure 4C) or P-4E-BP1T37/46 (P = 0.50; Figure 4D). Additionally, there was no effect of supplement condition on myotube diameter (P = 0.55; Figure 5D).
Figure 4.
Ex vivo immunoblot analysis. Following 1 h of amino acid deprivation, C2C12 myotubes were treated with ex vivo human serum (20% v/v) in low-glucose amino acid-free DMEM for 4 h before collection and analysis via immunoblotting. Puromycin (1 µM) was added for the last 30 min of the serum period. A) Puromycin incorporation into nascent peptides. B) Protein ubiquitination. C) Phosphorylation of RPS6S240/244. D) Phosphorylation of 4E-BP1T37/46. E) Representative blots. (n = 7). COL, Collagen; DIEAA, Dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula; BCAA, Branched-chain amino acids.
Figure 5.
Ex vivo myotube diameter. Following 1 h of amino acid deprivation, C2C12 myotubes were treated with ex vivo human serum (20% v/v) in low-glucose amino acid-free DMEM for 4 h before being fixed and stained for desmin and DAPI. A–C) Representative images obtained with a 10× objective. D) Myotube diameter (n = 10). COL, Collagen; DIEAA, Dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula; BCAA, Branched-chain amino acids.
3.5. Dileucine-containing serum tends to stimulate protein synthesis ex vivo
Mixed FSR (Figure 6) demonstrated a trend toward a main effect (P = 0.086). Pairwise comparisons revealed a large effect of DIEAA compared to COL (dz = 1.47 [95% CI: 0.08, 2.85]), a medium effect of DIEAA compared to BCAA (dz = 0.81 [–0.28, 1.89]), and a trivial effect of BCAA comapred to COL (dz = 0.002 [–0.92, 0.93]).
Figure 6.
Ex vivo stable-isotope derived measurements of mixed-protein fractional synthetic rate (FSR) samples expressed in %/hour (n = 7). Following 1 h of amino acid deprivation, C2C12 myotubes were treated with ex vivo human serum (20% v/v) in low-glucose amino acid-free DMEM supplemented with 200 µM [2H5]phenylalanine for 4 h to measure protein synthesis. Effect sizes (Cohen's dz) are shown for each pairwise comparison. COL, Collagen; DIEAA, Dileucine-containing essential amino acid formula; BCAA, Branched-chain amino acids.
4. Discussion
The present study demonstrated that the ingestion of a dileucine-containing essential amino acid supplement stimulated total exogenous leucine oxidation and leucine retention, similar to leucine-matched BCAA supplementation, and BCAA and DIEAA increased leucine retention to a greater extent than did collagen protein control after whole-body resistance exercise. The differences in postexercise leucine kinetics were independent of changes in urinary 3MH:Cr, an indicator of myofibrillar protein breakdown. Furthermore, using an ex vivo cell model, we demonstrated that DIEAA had a greater effect on mixed muscle protein synthesis (measured by tracer incorporation) compared to COL, potentially due to the postprandial increase in EAA, leucine, and dileucine concentrations.
3MH, formed by the methylation of peptide-bound histidine in actin and myosin, is a nonproteogenic amino acid that is excreted in urine following protein breakdown [15]. Owing to the high 3MH content in skeletal muscle relative to other tissues [42], the urinary 3MH concentration has been used as a surrogate marker of skeletal muscle myofibrillar protein breakdown [43]. We have previously shown that higher daily EAA intake can attenuate plasma 3MH in response to endurance training [44]. We have also shown that 6 g of leucine-enriched EAA, which is expected to attenuate the normal resistance exercise-induced rise in tracer-derived rates of mixed muscle protein breakdown [4], reduces urinary 3MH relative to BCAA and carbohydrate-only ingestion after a bout of high-intensity, high-volume body weight resistance exercise [12]. In contrast to our hypothesis and these previous observations, there were no differences in urinary 3MH between any of the tested supplementation conditions in the present study. As we did not have a control, we are unable to determine whether our exercise stimulus elicited an increase in myofibrillar protein catabolism, which may have been similarly attenuated by all nutritional conditions. Alternatively, given that muscle protein breakdown may be elevated for up to 24 h during recovery from resistance exercise [45], our 6-h measurement period may not have captured the full postexercise catabolic response to dietary amino acid supplementation that other studies using EAA did over a 24-h measurement period [17]. Furthermore, the present study compared postexercise urinary 3MH with isonitrogenous amino acid/protein ingestion rather than amino acid-free 3MH [12] or nonnutritive fasted controls [17]. Consequently, we cannot discount the possibility that DIEAA or BCAA may attenuate urinary 3MH:Cr after resistance exercise relative to the fasted postexercise state if measured over a longer period.
Using repeated breath sampling in combination with an oral [1-13C]leucine tracer that is primarily metabolized within the lean tissues of the body [46], we assessed the post-exercise retention of dietary leucine as a proxy for whole-body protein synthesis [24]. Exogenous leucine oxidation (ExoOx; Figure 3A) peaked at 60 min for DIEAA and BCAA, which is in line with our previous work using crystalline EAA [12]. Moreover, exogenous leucine oxidation returned to baseline values by 360 min, suggesting that the 6-h measurement period was sufficient to recover the 13C tracer from the bicarbonate pool. Consistent with previous observations showing that postexercise leucine oxidation increases with increasing leucine intake [12,47], the present study demonstrated that total exogenous leucine oxidation was higher with DIEAA and BCAA compared to COL. Since the proportion of leucine oxidized was similar between DIEAA and BCAA, the total exogenous leucine retention in these groups was also similar, and both had greater total exogenous leucine retention compared to COL. The negligible effect of COL supplementation on postexercise leucine retention for whole-body anabolism is ultimately due to its limited essential amino acid and leucine contents [48]. While it has previously been shown that dileucine ingestion results in greater myofibrillar protein synthesis than does an equivalent dose of leucine in rested skeletal muscle [13], we did not observe any difference between DIEAA and BCAA at the whole-body level after exercise. As the leucine content of a meal impacts postprandial whole-body leucine oxidation and nonoxidative leucine disposal [49], the similar retention between DIEAA and BCAA may be related to the comparable leucine content and plasma leucinemia.
To further assess the anabolic potential of the nutritional beverages, we treated C2C12 myotubes with human serum-conditioned media as an ex vivo model of muscle anabolism [20]. There were no differences across conditions in myotube diameter, puromycin incorporation, or total protein ubiquitination, indicating that the treatments did not significantly impact muscle cell growth or the processes involved in protein degradation over the 4-h refeeding period. Moreover, there were no differences in the phosphorylation of the mTORC1 downstream signaling proteins P-RPS6S240/244 or P-4E-BP1T37/46 across conditions. Our results are in general contrast to those of previous studies demonstrating that media conditioned with serum from older adults fed complete protein at rest increased myotube hypertrophy [39]. The absence of differences between the effects of supplement conditions on mTORC1 substrate phosphorylation may be due to the serum in our study being obtained from young adults during the early postexercise period (<1 h) that is characterized by postexercise increases in anabolic hormones (e.g. testosterone, insulin-like growth factor 1, etc.) [50,51], which can support muscle growth and attenuate protein breakdown in this cell model [52,53] and therefore potentially minimize subtle nutrient-induced changes in hypertrophy. Additionally, we investigated the muscle protein synthetic response by measuring the incorporation of puromycin into immature peptides using the SUnSET technique [54] and into mature proteins via stable isotope incorporation (i.e. FSR) over the 4-h refeeding period. There were no statistical differences in puromycin incorporation across all conditions despite ~25% higher puromycin incorporation in DIEAA compraed to COL and BCAA. The inability to detect statistical differences with puromycin incorporation may be due to variability in the method, as previous work has also observed [39]. Utilization of puromycin for measuring protein synthesis is also limited in that puromycin is only added to the culture media for 30 min prior to cell collection and only serves as a proxy measurement, as puromycin incorporation into nascent peptides truncates their synthesis, resulting in nonfunctional peptides. Conversely, the direct measurement of MPS utilizing a stable isotope tracer over the entire 4-h serum-stimulation period demonstrated a large and medium effect for DIEAA compared to COL and BCAA, respectively, with a trivial effect of BCAA compared to COL. As leucine (and other EAA, to a lesser extent) have been demonstrated to be potent activators of mTORC1 and protein synthesis in vitro [6] and in vivo [55], the greater capacity of serum from the DIEAA condition to stimulate MPS (as measured with a tracer) compared to the COL condition is likely due to the increased substrate availability of EAA, as evidenced by serum concentrations (Figure 2). Overall, while confirmatory experiments with larger sample sizes and a true control are needed, our minimally invasive ex vivo approach suggests that DIEAA-containing serum may have an anabolic effect when supplemented into amino acid-free media at a 20% concentration. These experiments provide proof-of-principle to explore muscle anabolism in vivo in the future.
Notably, BCAA resulted in postprandial dileucine concentrations that were similar to those observed in DIEAA, despite lacking any dileucine in its formulation. This finding could suggest that BCAA ingestion stimulates endogenous dileucine production, albeit with a high degree of interindividual variability and a low absolute serum concentration. This effect may reflect a bioactive property of leucine, as previous research has shown that 2 g of leucine induces a subtle increase in plasma dileucine concentrations above fasting levels within the first 60 min after ingestion [13]. Thus, the potential that dileucine may be synthesized endogenously from ingested leucine and that it has important anabolic bioactivity may warrant further investigation.
In contrast to our hypothesis, we demonstrated that DIEAA stimulated postexercise whole-body protein anabolism to a similar extent as BCAA. While previous research has indicated that 2 g of dileucine can enhance myofibrillar protein synthesis more than 2 g of leucine alone at rest [13], our study showed no significant difference in postexercise whole-body protein anabolism between DIEAA and BCAA. This discrepancy may be attributed to the distinct differences between whole-body protein dynamics and localized myofibillar protein synthesis [56–59]. While BCAAs can stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis [11], previous work suggests that the presence of other all the EAAs maximizes the magnitude and duration of myofibrillar protein synthesis to a greater extent than BCAAs alone [19,60]. Our ex vivo data further support this notion, showing a greater effect of DIEAA compared to COL for mixed muscle protein synthesis, suggesting that the additional EAAs support newly synthesized proteins at the muscle level. Considering the amino acid-induced stimulation of protein synthesis in an ex vivo model [20] is muted relative to the robust in vivo myofibrillar protein synthesis [32,33], ex vivo trends highlight the future need to examine how DIEAAs can support post-exercise muscle protein synthesis in humans.
In conclusion, dileucine-enriched essential amino acids and branched-chain amino acids supported greater leucine retention for whole-body anabolism compared with COL after resistance exercise independent of attenuation in estimates of myofibrillar protein breakdown. Moreover, our ex vivo experiments demonstrated a potential anabolic role of dileucine-enriched essential amino acids in stimulating MPS compared to a collagen-based amino acid composition. Collectively, our findings suggest that consuming dileucine within an EAA supplement is an effective strategy to support leucine retention for whole-body anabolism during recovery from resistance exercise in trained athletes.
Funding Statement
Funding was provided by Iovate Health Sciences International Inc. MJL is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship award (Funding Reference Number 187773). Tannenbaum Institute for Science in Sport.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, D.R.M., M.J.L. S.A.S., M.G., R.B.; data collection, J.A.A., C.T.T.G., M.J.L., I.K.; data analysis, J.J.L., C.T.T.G., M.J.L., D.W.D.W., N.A.B.; manuscript draft, J.A.A. C.T.T.G. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
S.A.S., M.S. and R.B. are employees of Iovate Health Sciences and developed the investigational supplements. S.A.S., M.S and R.B were not involved in data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or the decision to publish the results but did review the final manuscript draft.
References
- [1].Groen BBL, Horstman AM, Hamer HM, et al. Post-prandial protein handling: you are what you just ate. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141582. PMID: 26556791. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0141582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Pennings B, Koopman R, Beelen M, et al. Exercising before protein intake allows for greater use of dietary protein–derived amino acids for de novo muscle protein synthesis in both young and elderly men. AJCN. 2011;93:322–331. PMID: 21084649. doi: 10.3945/AJCN.2010.29649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Boirie Y, Gachon P, Corny S, et al. Acute postprandial changes in leucine metabolism as assessed with an intrinsically labeled milk protein. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:E1083–E1091. PMID: 8997229. doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.1996.271.6.E1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Børsheim E, Tipton KD, Wolf SE, et al. Essential amino acids and muscle protein recovery from resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;283:E648–E657. PMID: 12217881. doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.00466.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Wolfe RR. Regulation of muscle protein by amino acids. J Nutr. 2002;132:3219S–3224S. PMID: 12368421. doi: 10.1093/JN/131.10.3219S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Atherton PJ, Smith K, Etheridge T, et al. Distinct anabolic signalling responses to amino acids in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Amino Acids. 2010;38:1533–1539. PMID: 19882215. doi: 10.1007/S00726-009-0377-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Holowaty MNH, Lees MJ, Abou Sawan S, et al. Leucine ingestion promotes mTOR translocation to the periphery and enhances total and peripheral RPS6 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle. Amino Acids. 2023;55:253–261. PMID: 36474017. doi: 10.1007/s00726-022-03221-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Smith K, Barua JM, Watt PW, et al. Flooding with L-[1-13C]leucine stimulates human muscle protein incorporation of continuously infused L-[1-13C]valine. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1992;262:E372–E376. PMID: 1550230. doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.1992.262.3.E372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Fujita S, Dreyer HC, Drummond MJ, et al. Nutrient signalling in the regulation of human muscle protein synthesis. J Physiol. 2007;582:813–823. PMID: 17478528. doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2007.134593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Dreyer HC, Drummond MJ, Pennings B, et al. Leucine-enriched essential amino acid and carbohydrate ingestion following resistance exercise enhances mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in human muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;294:E392–E400. PMID: 18056791. doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.00582.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Jackman SR, Witard OC, Philp A, et al. Branched-chain amino acid ingestion stimulates muscle myofibrillar protein synthesis following resistance exercise in humans. Front Physiol. 2017;8:390. PMID: 28638350. doi: 10.3389/FPHYS.2017.00390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Waskiw-Ford M, Hodson N, Fung HJW, et al. Essential amino acid ingestion facilitates leucine retention and attenuates myofibrillar protein breakdown following bodyweight resistance exercise in young adults in a home-based setting. Nutrients. 2022;14:3532. PMID: 36079790. doi: 10.3390/nu14173532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Paulussen KJM, Alamilla RA, Salvador AF, et al. Dileucine ingestion is more effective than leucine in stimulating muscle protein turnover in young males: a double blind randomized controlled trial. J Appl Physiol. 2021;131:1111–1122. PMID: 34323596. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00295.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Tipton KD, Hamilton DL, Gallagher IJ. Assessing the role of muscle protein breakdown in response to nutrition and exercise in humans. Sports Med. 2018;48:53–64. PMID: 29368185. doi: 10.1007/S40279-017-0845-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Young VR, Munro HN. Ntau-methylhistidine (3-methylhistidine) and muscle protein turnover: an overview. Fed Proc. 1978;37:2291–2300. PMID: 350635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cegielski J, Wilkinson DJ, Brook MS, et al. Combined in vivo muscle mass, muscle protein synthesis and muscle protein breakdown measurement: a “combined oral stable isotope assessment of muscle (COSIAM)” approach. GeroScience. 2021;43:2653–2665. PMID: 34046811. doi: 10.1007/S11357-021-00386-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Liquid carbohydrate/essential amino acid ingestion during a short-term bout of resistance exercise suppresses myofibrillar protein degradation. Metabolism. 2006;55:570–577. PMID: 16631431. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Independent and combined effects of liquid carbohydrate/essential amino acid ingestion on hormonal and muscular adaptations following resistance training in untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;97:225–238. PMID: 16456674. doi: 10.1007/S00421-005-0127-Z/FIGURES/7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Wolfe RR. Branched-chain amino acids and muscle protein synthesis in humans: myth or reality? J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:1–7. PMID: 28852372. doi: 10.1186/S12970-017-0184-9/FIGURES/1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Carson BP, Patel B, Amigo-Benavent M, et al. Regulation of muscle protein synthesis in an in vitro cell model using ex vivo human serum. Exp Physiol. 2018;103:783–789. PMID: 29607575. doi: 10.1113/EP086860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Allen SL, Elliott BT, Carson BP, et al. Improving physiological relevance of cell culture: the possibilities, considerations, and future directions of the ex vivo coculture model. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2023;324:C420–C427. PMID: 36571441. doi: 10.1152/AJPCELL.00473.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Patel B, Pauk M, Amigo-Benavent M, et al. A cell-based evaluation of a non-essential amino acid formulation as a non-bioactive control for activation and stimulation of muscle protein synthesis using ex vivo human serum. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0220757. PMID: 31743341. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0220757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Aussieker T, Hilkens L, Holwerda AM, et al. Collagen protein ingestion during recovery from exercise does not increase muscle connective protein synthesis rates. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023;55:1792–1802. PMID: 37202878. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Mazzulla M, Hodson N, West DWD, et al. Non-invasive13 CO2 breath test detects differences in anabolic sensitivity with feeding and heavy resistance exercise in healthy young males: a randomized control trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2022;47:860–870. PMID: 35609328. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2021-0808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17:338–345. PMID: 1330274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395. PMID: 12900694. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Brožek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, et al. Densitometric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative assumptions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963;110:113–140. PMID: 14062375. doi: 10.1111/J.1749-6632.1963.TB17079.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Mazzulla M, Hodson N, Lees M, et al. LAT1 and SNAT2 Protein expression and membrane localization of LAT1 are not acutely altered by dietary amino acids or resistance exercise nor positively associated with leucine or phenylalanine incorporation in human skeletal muscle. Nutrients. 2021;13:3906. PMID: 34836160. doi: 10.3390/NU13113906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].West DWD, Sawan SA, Mazzulla M, et al. Whey protein supplementation enhances whole body protein metabolism and performance recovery after resistance exercise: a double-blind crossover study. Nutrients. 2017;9:735. PMID: 28696380. doi: 10.3390/NU9070735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Borg Gunnar. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- [31].Hagele AM, Krieger JM, Gaige CJ, et al. Dileucine ingestion, but not leucine, increases lower body strength and performance following resistance training: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0312997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Churchward-Venne TA, Breen L, Di Donato DM, et al. Leucine supplementation of a low-protein mixed macronutrient beverage enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis in young men: a double-blind, randomized trial. AJCN. 2014;99:276–286. PMID: 24284442. doi: 10.3945/AJCN.113.068775. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Witard OC, Jackman SR, Breen L, et al. Myofibrillar muscle protein synthesis rates subsequent to a meal in response to increasing doses of whey protein at rest and after resistance exercise. AJCN. 2014;99:86–95. PMID: 24257722. doi: 10.3945/AJCN.112.055517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Neuhäuser M, Bässler KH. Endogenous 3-methylhistidine excretion in healthy women and men with reference to muscle protein metabolism. Z Ernahrungswiss. 1984;23:171–180. PMID: 6506809. doi: 10.1007/BF02021471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Sjolin J, Stjernstrom H, Henneberg S, et al. Evaluation of urinary 3-methylhistidine excretion in infection by measurements of 1-methylhistidine and the creatinine ratios. AJCN. 1989;49:62–70. PMID: 2912013. doi: 10.1093/AJCN/49.1.62. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Salvador AF, Askow AT, McKenna CF, et al. Resistance exercise-induced regulation of muscle protein synthesis to intraset rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52:1022–1030. PMID: 31703023. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002213 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Allen SL, Marshall RN, Edwards SJ, et al. The effect of young and old ex vivo human serum on cellular protein synthesis and growth in an in vitro model of aging. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;321:C26–C37. PMID: 33909501. doi: 10.1152/AJPCELL.00093.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Allen SL, Seabright AP, Quinlan JI, et al. The effect of ex vivo human serum from liver disease patients on cellular protein synthesis and growth. Cells. 2022;11:1098. PMID: 35406665. doi: 10.3390/CELLS11071098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Lees MJ, Nolan D, Amigo-Benavent M, et al. A fish-derived protein hydrolysate induces postprandial aminoacidaemia and skeletal muscle anabolism in an in vitro cell model using ex vivo human serum. Nutrients. 2021;13:1–17. PMID: 33671235. doi: 10.3390/nu13020647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Hannaian SJ, Hodson N, Sawan SA, et al. Leucine-enriched amino acids maintain peripheral mTOR-Rheb localization independent of myofibrillar protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling postexercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020;129:133–143. PMID: 32525432. doi: 10.1152/JAPPLPHYSIOL.00241.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Atherton PJ, Szewczyk NJ, Selby A, et al. Cyclic stretch reduces myofibrillar protein synthesis despite increases in FAK and anabolic signalling in L6 cells. J Physiol. 2009;587:3719–3727. PMID: 19470773. doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2009.169854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Elia M, Carter A, Smith R. The 3-methylhistidine content of human tissues. Br J Nutr. 1979;42:567–570. PMID: 508716. doi: 10.1079/BJN19790149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Young VR, Alexis SD, Suren Baliga B, et al. Metabolism of administered 3-methylhistidine. lack of muscle transfer ribonucleic acid charging and quantitative excretion as 3-methylhistidine and its n-acetyl derivative. J Biol Chem. 1972;247:3592–3600. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)45182-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Williamson E, Kato H, Volterman KA, et al. Greater plasma essential amino acids and lower 3-methylhistidine with higher protein intake during endurance training: a randomised control trial. Amino Acids. 2023;55:1285–1291. PMID: 36477889. doi: 10.1007/S00726-022-03210-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Phillips SM, Tipton KD, Aarsland A, et al. Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:E99–E107. PMID: 9252485. doi: 10.1152/AJPENDO.1997.273.1.E99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Tessari P, Garibotto G, Inchiostro S, et al. Kidney, splanchnic, and leg protein turnover in humans. insight from leucine and phenylalanine kinetics. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1481–1492. PMID: 8823315. doi: 10.1172/JCI118937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Moore DR, Robinson MJ, Fry JL, et al. Ingested protein dose response of muscle and albumin protein synthesis after resistance exercise in young men. AJCN. 2009;89:161–168. PMID: 19056590. doi: 10.3945/AJCN.2008.26401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [48].McKendry J, Lowisz CV, Nanthakumar A, et al. The effects of whey, pea, and collagen protein supplementation beyond the recommended dietary allowance on integrated myofibrillar protein synthetic rates in older males: a randomized controlled trial. AJCN. 2024;120:34–46. PMID: 38762187. doi: 10.1016/J.AJCNUT.2024.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Dangin M, Guillet C, Garcia-Rodenas C, et al. The rate of protein digestion affects protein gain differently during aging in humans. J Physiol. 2003;549:635–644. PMID: 12665610. doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2002.036897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].West DWD, Kujbida GW, Moore DR, et al. Resistance exercise-induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signalling in young men. J Physiol. 2009;587:5239–5247. PMID: 19736298. doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2009.177220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].West DWD, Burd NA, Churchward-Venne TA, et al. Sex-based comparisons of myofibrillar protein synthesis after resistance exercise in the fed state. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1805–1813. PMID: 22383503. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00170.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Latres E, Amini AR, Amini AA, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) inversely regulates atrophy-induced genes via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:2737–2744. PMID: 15550386. doi: 10.1074/JBC.M407517200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].White JP, Gao S, Puppa MJ, et al. Testosterone regulation of Akt/mTORC1/FoxO3a signaling in skeletal muscle. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;365:174–186. PMID: 23116773. doi: 10.1016/J.MCE.2012.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Goodman CA, Mabrey DM, Frey JW, et al. Novel insights into the regulation of skeletal muscle protein synthesis as revealed by a new nonradioactive in vivo technique. FASEB J. 2011;25:1028–1039. PMID: 21148113. doi: 10.1096/FJ.10-168799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Churchward-Venne TA, Burd NA, Mitchell CJ, et al. Supplementation of a suboptimal protein dose with leucine or essential amino acids: effects on myofibrillar protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in men. J Physiol. 2012;590:2751–2765. PMID: 22451437. doi: 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.2012.228833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Churchward-Venne TA, Pinckaers PJM, Smeets JSJ, et al. Dose-response effects of dietary protein on muscle protein synthesis during recovery from endurance exercise in young men: a double-blind randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112:303–317. PMID: 32359142. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Gwin JA, Church DD, Hatch-McChesney A, et al. Effects of high versus standard essential amino acid intakes on whole-body protein turnover and mixed muscle protein synthesis during energy deficit: a randomized, crossover study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:767–777. PMID: 32768315. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Holwerda AM, Paulussen KJM, Overkamp M, et al. Dose-dependent increases in whole-body net protein balance and dietary protein-derived amino acid incorporation into myofibrillar protein during recovery from resistance exercise in older men. J Nutr. 2019;149:221–230. PMID: 30722014. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Kim I-Y, Schutzler S, Schrader A, et al. The anabolic response to a meal containing different amounts of protein is not limited by the maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in healthy young adults. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016;310:73–80. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00365.2015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Kaspy MS, Hannaian SJ, Bell ZW, et al. The effects of branched-chain amino acids on muscle protein synthesis, muscle protein breakdown and associated molecular signalling responses in humans: an update. Nutr Res Rev. 2024;37:273–286. PMID: 37681443. doi: 10.1017/S0954422423000197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






