Table 2.
Comparison of PSPNet and PSPEdgeWeedNet variants.
| Aspect | PSPNet | PSPEdgeWeedNet without CRF | PSPEdgeWeedNet with CRF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boundary definition | Poor; boundaries between crops and weeds are blurred | Improved boundary sharpness compared to PSPNet | Well-defined and continuous boundaries |
| Weed leaf structure preservation | Inadequate; leaf structures are not clearly captured | Partial preservation; leaf edges are still not sharply structured | Good preservation; leaf morphology is maintained |
| Misclassification | Present; crops misclassified as weeds | Minimal; misclassifications largely eliminated | No significant misclassification observed |
| Edge sharpness | Low; edges appear soft and diffused | Moderate; improved but not optimal | High; edges are sharp and detailed |
| Tiny weed detection | Missed frequently | Slight improvement, but still limited | Some very small weeds missed, but overall better retention |
| Overall segmentation quality | Suboptimal | Moderate; better than baseline | Significantly improved |