Table 4.
Comparison of segmentation models.
| Model | Pyramid pooling | Edge detection focus | Boundary precision | Computational efficiency | Key strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNet | ✗ | ✗ | Moderate | High | Strong performance in small datasets |
| SegNet | ✗ | ✗ | Moderate | Moderate | Memory-efficient decoding |
| PSPNet | ✓ | ✗ | Moderate to High | Moderate | Multiscale context understanding |
| DeepLabv3 | ✓ | ✗ | Moderate to High | Moderate to Low | Captures large context without resolution loss |
| Swin-Unet | ✓ | ✗ | High | High | Good for dense prediction tasks |
| Light weight transformer model based on ViT | ✗ | ✗ | Moderate | Low | Excellent for classification and transfer learning |
| PSPEdgeWeedNet | ✓ | ✓ | High | Moderate | Improved boundary localization, efficient deep feature extraction, better fine-grained segmentation |