Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1988 Apr 15;138(8):697–703.

Guidelines for reading literature reviews.

A D Oxman 1, G H Guyatt 1
PMCID: PMC1267776  PMID: 3355948

Abstract

One strategy for dealing with the burgeoning medical literature is to rely on reviews of the literature. Although this strategy is efficient, readers may be misled if the review does not meet scientific standards. Therefore, guidelines that will help readers assess the scientific quality of the review are proposed. The guidelines focus on the definition of the question, the comprehensiveness of the search strategy, the methods of choosing and assessing the primary studies, and the methods of combining the results and reaching appropriate conclusions. Application of the guidelines will allow clinicians to spend their valuable reading time on high-quality material and to judge the validity of an author's conclusions.

Full text

PDF
697

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baylink D. J. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 1983 Aug 4;309(5):306–308. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198308043090509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chalmers T. C., Smith H., Jr, Blackburn B., Silverman B., Schroeder B., Reitman D., Ambroz A. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials. 1981 May;2(1):31–49. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Conn H. O., Blitzer B. L. Nonassociation of adrenocorticosteroid therapy and peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med. 1976 Feb 26;294(9):473–479. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197602262940905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper H. M., Rosenthal R. Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychol Bull. 1980 May;87(3):442–449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guyatt G. H., Newhouse M. T. Are active and passive smoking harmful? Determining causation. Chest. 1985 Sep;88(3):445–451. doi: 10.1378/chest.88.3.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guyatt G. H., Webber C. E., Mewa A. A., Sackett D. L. Determining causation--a case study: adrenocorticosteroids and osteoporosis. Should the fear of inducing clinically important osteoporosis influence the decision to prescribe adrenocorticosteroids? J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(5):343–352. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90100-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrington J. T., Isner J. M., Kassirer J. P. Our national obsession with potassium. Am J Med. 1982 Aug;73(2):155–159. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Fitzgerald D., Guyatt G. H., Walker C. J., Sackett D. L. How to keep up with the medical literature: I. Why try to keep up and how to get started. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Jul;105(1):149–153. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-1-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Horwitz R. I. Complexity and contradiction in clinical trial research. Am J Med. 1987 Mar;82(3):498–510. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huth E. J. Needed: review articles with more scientific rigor. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):470–471. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-470_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaplan N. M. Our appropriate concern about hypokalemia. Am J Med. 1984 Jul;77(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90427-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Labarthe D. R. Mild hypertension: the question of treatment. Annu Rev Public Health. 1986;7:193–215. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.07.050186.001205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Messer J., Reitman D., Sacks H. S., Smith H., Jr, Chalmers T. C. Association of adrenocorticosteroid therapy and peptic-ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jul 7;309(1):21–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198307073090105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mulrow C. D. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485–488. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Poynard T., Conn H. O. The retrieval of randomized clinical trials in liver disease from the medical literature. A comparison of MEDLARS and manual methods. Control Clin Trials. 1985 Dec;6(4):271–279. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90103-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Robin E. D. The cult of the Swan-Ganz catheter. Overuse and abuse of pulmonary flow catheters. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Sep;103(3):445–449. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-3-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sacks H. S., Berrier J., Reitman D., Ancona-Berk V. A., Chalmers T. C. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 19;316(8):450–455. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702193160806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sacks H. S., Chalmers T. C., Berk A. A., Reitman D. Should mild hypertension be treated? An attempted meta-analysis of the clinical trials. Mt Sinai J Med. 1985 Apr;52(4):265–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sacks H., Chalmers T. C., Smith H., Jr Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials. Am J Med. 1982 Feb;72(2):233–240. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90815-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Simes R. J. Confronting publication bias: a cohort design for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1987 Jan-Feb;6(1):11–29. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Simes R. J. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct;4(10):1529–1541. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.10.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Susser M. The logic of Sir Karl Popper and the practice of epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Nov;124(5):711–718. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Swan H. J., Ganz W. Hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice: a decade in review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Jan;1(1):103–113. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES