Skip to main content
. 2025 Nov 21;11:e71767. doi: 10.2196/71767

Table 2.

Comparison of demographics between respondents who had and had not used artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots.


Had used AI chatbots (n=59), n (%) Had not used AI chatbots (n=135), n (%) P value
Age (years), mean (SD) 38.7 (9.1) 38.7 (9.5) >.99
Gender .40

Woman 39 (66.1) 103 (76.3)

Man 19 (32.2) 29 (21.5)

Nonbinary or third gender 0 (0.0) 1 (0.7)

Preferred not to self-describe 1 (1.7) 2 (1.5)
Years of practice .41

0-5 15 (25.4) 40 (29.6)

6-10 16 (27.1) 62 (45.9)

11-15 11 (18.6) 21 (15.6)

>15 17 (28.8) 39 (28.9)
Area of practice .002

Hospital 38 (64.4) 74 (54.8)

Community 4 (6.8) 25 (18.5)

Ambulatory 12 (20.3) 24 (17.8)

Academia 11 (18.6) 5 (3.7)

Specialty 0 (0.0) 6 (4.4)
Coworker use of AI chatbots <.001

Yes 25 (42.4) 9 (6.7)

No 9 (15.3) 69 (51.1)

Unsure 25 (42.4) 57 (42.2)
AI policy at practice site .02

Yes 11 (18.6) 8 (5.9)

No 30 (50.8) 82 (60.7)

Unsure 18 (30.5) 45 (33.3)
How likely would you be to make a health care (ie, patient care or treatment) related recommendation based on the information an AI Chatbot (eg, ChatGPT) provides you?” .33

Extremely unlikely 32 (54.2) 57 (42.2)

Somewhat unlikely 16 (27.1) 41 (30.4)

Neither likely nor unlikely 9 (15.3) 25 (18.5)

Somewhat likely 2 (3.4) 12 (8.9)

Extremely likely 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
How likely would you be to make a policy related decision based on the information an AI Chatbot (eg, ChatGPT) provides you?” .25

Extremely unlikely 17 (28.8) 49 (36.3)

Somewhat unlikely 15 (25.4) 37 (27.4)

Neither likely nor unlikely 16 (27.1) 34 (25.2)

Somewhat likely 11 (18.6) 12 (8.9)

Extremely likely 0 (0.0) 3 (2.2)