Skip to main content
Genes & Diseases logoLink to Genes & Diseases
. 2025 Jun 22;13(2):101731. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101731

Mechanotransduction and musculoskeletal regeneration: Molecular mechanisms and interdisciplinary applications

Xiajie Huang a,b,e, Wenjun Hao a,e, Yangzhou Mo a, Xinyun Liang a, Xiaomei Wu a, Daofu Zeng a, Yubin Mo a, William Lu c, Di Chen d, Yan Chen a,b,
PMCID: PMC12681786  PMID: 41362672

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis, or the Illizarov technique, induces bone regeneration using distractive mechanical forces. Nevertheless, Wolff's law holds that bone adapts to reverse compressive mechanical loads, growing denser in areas of high pressure and resorbing in zones of low pressure. These two forms of new bone formation together suggest that mechanical stimuli play an important role in bone remodeling and regeneration. The therapeutic efficacy of distraction osteogenesis has been recognized in orthopedics and maxillofacial surgeries. Distraction osteogenesis was even used for the regeneration of various other tissues/organs, such as blood vessels and skin (e.g., in the treatment of limb ischemic diseases and foot ulcers), suggesting the principle of distraction histogenesis. However, the underlying mechanisms, particularly those of the cross-organ effects and in terms of mechanotransduction, remain poorly understood. Thus, this review aims to explore the recent advances in research on musculoskeletal regeneration and its association with mechanosensitive channels from a new interdisciplinary application perspective. The contents can provide insights into potential research directions for understanding the molecular mechanisms of musculoskeletal regeneration and its clinical applications.

Keywords: Cross-organ regeneration, Distraction histogenesis, Distraction osteogenesis, Interdisciplinary applications, Law of tension-stress, Mechanosensitive channels, Mechanotransduction

Introduction

Distraction osteogenesis (DO), which was introduced by Dr. Ilizarov in the mid-20th century and also known as bone transport, the law of tension-stress, or Ilizarov technique, induces bone regeneration via an osteotomy followed by distracted mechanical forces.1,2 Interestingly, Wolff's law, developed by Julius Wolff in the 19th century, states that bone remodels itself to the mechanical loads (i.e., the reverse compressive forces), growing denser in areas of high pressure and resorbing in areas of low pressure.3,4 Nevertheless, no matter whether the new bone is mediated by distraction according to the DO principle or by compression based on Wolff's law, there is a consensus that mechanical stimuli play an important role in bone remodeling and regeneration.5

DO has been successfully used in many fields such as bone defect repair, deformity correction, limb lengthening, and orthodontics.6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Moreover, the principles and applications of DO have extended to the regeneration of blood vessels, skin, nerves, and other tissues.11 This leads to the purpose of the distraction histogenesis (DH) theory, which holds that the distraction of any living tissues leads to the regeneration of the tissues themselves. Furthermore, recently, we and other groups have found that tibial cortex transverse transport (TTT) facilitates the healing of recalcitrant ulcers at remote sites, such as the foot.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 These interdisciplinary and cross-organ effects underscore the universal importance of mechanical stimulation in tissue regeneration. During DH, bones serve as sites for mechanical force stimulation and formation of multiple osteokines, showing the central role of mechanical signals in promoting regeneration and repair.17,18 To promote tissue regeneration, mechanical signals need to be converted into biological signals by mechanosensitive channels, a process known as mechanotransduction.19 Understanding the mechanism of mechanotransduction in DH is crucial for advancing its application.18,20 Despite the widespread clinical application of DH, the mechanistic pathways, particularly those involving mechanosensitive channels, are not well documented in the existing literature. Hence, this review explores the recent advances in research on DH and its relationship with mechanosensitive channels, highlighting their roles in mechanotransduction.

Research progress in distraction histogenesis

Development of DH

DO was initially used for the treatment of complex fractures and bone defects10,21 (Fig. 1). This technique gained international recognition in the 1980s and began to be used for a wide range of clinical settings, including bone defect repair, limb lengthening, and various bone deformity corrections.10,22,23 In 1989, Dr. Ilizarov elaborated the law of tension-stress, which states that applying continuous, stable, and slow distraction forces to living tissues can stimulate their own regeneration and growth.1,2 DO was then used for human mandibular elongation in 1991.24,25 Subsequently, DO has been widely used for the reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects and deformities, limb deformity correction, and lengthening26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The development of DO and DH. DO, distraction osteogenesis; DH, distraction histogenesis; TTT, tibial cortex transverse transport; CBT, cranial bone transport.

Recently, Chinese scholars developed the TTT.12, 13, 14, 15, 16,32 Unlike the traditional longitudinal bone transport, in TTT, the bone fragments were distracted horizontally/transversely (Fig. 2A, B). Furthermore, the bone traction frame used in TTT is unilateral, which simplifies the procedure compared with the more complex circular frame used in the Ilizarov technique. This simplicity benefits both the surgical process and postoperative management, making it more accessible and acceptable to patients. The primary aim of TTT is not to stimulate bone formation, but rather, the regeneration of the soft tissues or organs, including skin, vessels, nerves, and muscle.15 This technique is particularly effective in treating chronic ischemic diseases of the lower extremities, such as diabetic foot ulcers, thromboangiitis obliterans, and arteriosclerotic obliterans.32,33 This is a key focus of our group's research and efforts.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 In addition, cranial bone transport was found to enhance angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and meningeal lymphatic drainage in rats with cerebral ischemia34 (Fig. 2C), suggesting that DO could serve as a novel therapeutic approach for cerebral ischemic diseases. Together, the prior findings indicate that the distraction of any living tissues leads to the regeneration of the tissues themselves. Thus, the term distraction histogenesis (DH) is coined for this theory.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparative models of Ilizarov technique, tibial cortex transverse transport, and cranial bone transport. (A) The traditional Ilizarov technique employs circular external fixators to gradually apply longitudinal tension to osteotomized bone segments, promoting regeneration of bone itself and the surrounding soft tissues. (B) TTT technique utilizes unilateral external fixators to slowly laterally transport tibial bone segments, fostering regeneration of vascular tissues and skin at the foot wounds. (C) Cranial bone transport enhanced angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and meningeal lymphatic drainage in rats with cerebral ischemia, suggesting it is a potential therapeutic approach for cerebral ischemic diseases.

DO consists of continuous microinjuries (microinjury-new bone formation cycles).35 Injury can trigger in situ tissue repair, leading to the restoration of tissue structure and functions at the injury site through a series of well-orchestrated biological events.36 More intriguing is the concept that microinjury can mediate localized tissue regeneration without resulting in severe trauma or scarring.37 This concept is supported by evidence that microinjuries can stimulate the body's natural repair mechanisms, activating cellular responses and tissue growth in a localized manner, similar to larger injuries, but with less risk of fibrosis or adverse side effects.36,37

Based on the findings of prior studies, we propose a theory of microinjury-induced remote repair.35 This theory holds that remote continuous microinjuries performed intentionally in normal tissues (e.g., bone) can trigger the intrinsic repair/regeneration ability of the body, which facilitates the repair/regeneration of not only the in situ tissues (e.g., bone and the surrounding soft tissues) but also the target tissues (e.g., foot ulcers).35 The microinjuries created should follow some instructions as summarized in Table 1. Nevertheless, this theory needs to be validated, and our studies are ongoing.

Table 1.

Key characteristics of the microinjury-induced remote repair (MIRR) theory.

Characteristics Description
Microinjuries Injuries should be small enough to trigger pro-regenerative cytokine production while not causing severe local damage or scar formation.
Continuous injuries
Controlled injuries
Injuries must be persistent to sustain cytokine release, aligning with the prolonged healing process of target tissues.
Injuries should be controllable by doctors and/or patients or self-administrable (e.g., using external distraction system).
Remote location Injuries should be distant from the target damaged tissues to avoid further trauma and minimize infection risk of the surgical site.
Injury purpose Mimics the body's intrinsic repair mechanisms to enhance tissue regeneration at both local and distant sites.

Traditional applications of DH

Bone defect repair

DH is extensively used for bone defect repair, particularly in craniofacial and orthopedic surgeries (Fig. 3). This technique is valuable in cases of severe bone loss caused by trauma, infections, or tumor resection, as it can regenerate bone at major defect sites without extensive bone grafts.38, 39, 40

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The traditional applications of distraction histogenesis.

Limb lengthening

Limb lengthening surgery involves gradual distraction of the osteotomized bone segments, promoting abundant new bone formation at the gap, thus achieving an increase in bone length.41,42 This technique has been successfully used for various congenital and acquired conditions affecting the clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, and phalanges (Fig. 3). Common indications for limb lengthening include chondrodysplasia, radial longitudinal deficiency, multiple hereditary exostoses, short metacarpal bones, and symbrachydactyly, as well as post-traumatic and post-infection growth disturbances.43,44

Deformity correction

DH effectively corrects complex bone deformities and can be applied to various anatomical locations, including craniofacial areas, the spine, and long bones45,46 (Fig. 3). This technique allows precise control over the extent and direction of bone growth. In craniofacial reconstruction, DH is used for patients with conditions such as cleft lip and palate, improving their appearance and functionality.47, 48, 49 In orthognathic surgery, this technique is used for mandibular advancement procedures to improve occlusion and facial aesthetics, particularly useful for treating temporomandibular joint disorders and jaw asymmetry.25 Additionally, DH can be utilized in orthodontic treatments to adjust the shape and position of the alveolar bone to correct tooth alignment.50,51

Treatment of nonunion and malunion

In the treatment of nonunion and malunion, DH offers significant advantages (Fig. 3). DH effectively stimulates bone generation through sustained mechanical traction and improves the blood supply and metabolism of bone tissue, thereby accelerating the healing process. Compared with traditional methods such as bone grafting and internal fixation, DH not only reduces the risks of rejection and infections but also significantly increases the bone healing rate by utilizing the patient's own ability for regeneration.52, 53, 54, 55

The recent applications of DH

Management of ischemic diseases

DH can be used to improve ischemic diseases of the lower limbs by gradually lengthening the bone around the ischemic area, thereby increasing vascular generation and blood supply and improving tissue repair and symptom relief56,57 (Fig. 4). For severe arteriosclerosis obliterans of the lower limbs, traditional treatments primarily involve interventional surgery to reopen the large blood vessels near the proximal limb. However, it is technically challenging to reopen smaller blood vessels in the distal limb (e.g., below the ankle), and the treatment results are frequently unsatisfactory. DH can promote microvascular regeneration, achieving significant therapeutic effects in the treatment of severe arteriosclerosis obliterans of the lower limbs.56,57

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The recent applications of distraction histogenesis to soft tissue regeneration.

Treatment of refractory wounds

Refractory wounds are traumatic wounds that cannot heal or cure on their own.58,59 They can be caused by various factors such as infection, ischemia, or diabetes.60 DH can accelerate the healing process of such refractory wounds by altering the structure of surrounding tissues and promoting vascular generation (Fig. 4). In some cases, DH can provide sufficient regenerated tissues to ultimately facilitate wound healing, thereby avoiding complications such as infection or necrosis.12, 13, 14, 15,61

In addition, studies have shown that TTT has demonstrated good efficacy in the treatment of lower limb lymphedema62 (Fig. 4). Other reports indicate that with the assistance of a simple Ilizarov external fixator, sufficient skin can be gradually stretched to reconstruct web spaces and cover lateral defects of the fingers63 (Fig. 4). Through structured functional rehabilitation, patients not only regained hand function but also achieved satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.63 Remarkably, the application of DH technology has also been extended to the management of osteoarthritis. Joint distraction surgery, which uses an external fixator to maintain joint space and reduce cartilage loading, has shown promising long-term results in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (Fig. 4). Compared with total knee arthroplasty, knee joint distraction has provided a satisfactory joint-preserving alternative based on long-term follow-up studies.64,65 Overall, DH is a versatile medical technique that has been widely applied across various fields and continues to drive advancements in the medical sector.

Cellular responses during DH

During DH, mechanical distraction stimuli activate various cell types to participate in the repair and regeneration of both bone and soft tissues (including vessels, skin, and nerves). The following summarizes the specific responses and mechanisms of different cellular populations involved in this process (Table 2).

Table 2.

Cellular responses during distraction histogenesis.

Cell type Cellular responses and mechanisms during distraction histogenesis References
Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Respond to mechanical tension with chemotaxis, leading to proliferation and differentiation toward osteogenic and angiogenic lineages; secrete exosomes to support angiogenesis and osteogenesis. 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
Osteoblasts Directly participate in new bone formation; mechanical tension enhances their proliferation, matrix secretion, and mineralization. 70, 71, 72
Osteocytes Act as primary mechanosensors embedded in bone matrix; detect mechanical stretch via Piezo1, triggering downstream osteogenic signals. 68
Chondrocytes Involved in both intramembranous and endochondral ossification; promote cartilaginous callus formation and extension via chondromodulin expression. 73,74
Endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells Undergo proliferation, migration, and lumen formation in response to mechanical stimulation; endothelial progenitor cells mobilize to injury sites to promote angiogenesis. 16,35,75, 76, 77
Fibroblasts Proliferate and synthesize collagen and fibronectin; contribute to extracellular matrix remodeling and provide structural support and mechanical cushioning. 61,78,79
Myogenic cells Activated by mechanical stretch; promote muscle tissue repair, muscle fiber formation, and regeneration. 80
Macrophages and immune cells Mechanical forces promote M2 polarization; M2 macrophages suppress excessive inflammation, enhance angiogenesis and osteogenesis; mechanical stimuli activate immune cells to modulate the microenvironment. 70,77,81, 82, 83
Neural cells (Schwann cells) Activated by distraction forces; secrete neurotrophic factors that promote axonal regeneration and myelin repair. 84, 85, 86, 87

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are one of the key mechanosensitive multipotent stem cell populations and serve as the critical starting point for distraction osteogenesis and multi-tissue regeneration.66,67 Mechanical tension stimulates the chemotaxis, proliferation, and differentiation of BMSCs toward osteogenic and angiogenic lineages.66,67 This differentiation process is primarily mediated through the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathways.66,67 In addition, the piezoelectric element-type mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 plays an essential role in enabling BMSCs to sense mechanical stretch; its activation enhances the osteogenic potential of BMSCs and promotes new bone formation.68 Recent research also suggests that BMSCs contribute to angiogenesis and osteogenesis by secreting exosomes, playing a vital role throughout the entire process of distraction-induced tissue regeneration.69,70

Osteoblasts, osteocytes, and chondrocytes

During DH, osteoblasts serve as key effector cells directly responsible for new bone formation.70, 71, 72 Mechanical tensile forces significantly enhance their proliferation, bone matrix secretion, and mineralization.70, 71, 72 Simultaneously, osteocytes, embedded within the bone matrix as primary mechanosensors, can detect tensile forces via the activation of Piezo1 ion channels.68 This mechanotransduction process further stimulates the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs, thereby promoting bone regeneration.68 In parallel, chondrocytes also play an essential role during DH. They are involved in both intramembranous and endochondral ossification and further contribute to tissue regeneration by up-regulating chondromodulin expression, which promotes the formation and extension of cartilaginous callus.73,74

Endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells

Angiogenesis is an essential process during DH. Studies showed that mechanical stimulation can activate the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1α), and phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathways, inducing endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and lumen formation.16,75,76 In addition, during transverse bone transport in the rat tibia, bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells can be activated and proliferate, subsequently mobilizing into the peripheral circulation to reach diabetic foot ulcers, where they promote vascular regeneration.35,77

Fibroblasts and myogenic cells

During DH, in addition to the regeneration of bone and vessels, the repair of soft tissues such as skin and muscle is equally critical. Fibroblasts proliferate under mechanical distraction stimuli and synthesize collagen and fibronectin, contributing to extracellular matrix remodeling and providing structural support and mechanical buffering for newly formed tissues.61,78,79 Meanwhile, myogenic cells are also activated by mechanical stretch, promoting muscle tissue repair and facilitating the formation and regeneration of muscle fibers.80

Macrophages and immune cells

Mechanical forces play a crucial role in tissue repair and regeneration by regulating macrophage polarization in DH. These forces promote the polarization of macrophages from M1 toward the M2 phenotype, which helps suppress excessive inflammatory responses while enhancing angiogenesis and osteogenesis.77,81 In addition, micro-injuries and continuous mechanical stimulation during the distraction process synergistically activate immune cells, modulate the local microenvironment, and thereby facilitate tissue remodeling and regeneration70,82,83

Neural cells

In recent years, studies have found that mechanical distraction can also influence the regeneration of the peripheral nervous system.84, 85, 86, 87 Schwann cells are activated under distraction conditions and secrete neurotrophic factors, such as nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which promote axonal growth and myelin repair.84, 85, 86, 87

Mechanosensitive channels

Mechanosensitive channels are a specialized class of protein channels that sense physical forces such as pressure, stretch, or tactile stimuli and convert them into intracellular signals, which are crucial for bone and tissue regeneration.88, 89, 90 These channels are embedded in the cell membrane and open in response to physical deformation caused by external forces, allowing ions like sodium and calcium to flow in or out of the cell, thereby initiating intracellular signal transduction and other physiological responses.88, 89, 90 These channels are widespread among bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, playing a significant role in evolutionary history and signal transduction.91 The mechanosensitive channels have four widely accepted standards: i) the channels must be expressed in mechanosensory organs; ii) removing mechanosensitive channels results in the direct loss of mechanical responses; iii) mutation of these channels alters their physical properties and reflects in mechanical response changes; and iv) heterologous expression of channels can be mechanically activated.92

Historically, most knowledge about the gating mechanisms of mechanosensitive channels came from studies on bacterial channels. However, recent advances in identifying and understanding the structure of eukaryotic two-pore domain K+ (K2P) channels, Twik-related K+ (TREK) and Twik-related acid-arachidonic activated K+ (TRAAK), as well as Piezo1 and Piezo2 mechanosensitive channels, have greatly enhanced our understanding of the biophysical principles of these fascinating membrane proteins and their evolutionary origins.91 To date, several mechanogated channel families, such as degenerin/epithelial sodium (DEG/ENaC), transient receptor potential (TRP), K2P, transmembrane channel-like (TMC), and Piezo channels, have been identified in eukaryotes.92 The following sections will mainly introduce three mechanosensitive channels closely related to DH: Piezo channels, TRP channels, and ENaCs.93 We summarize the key mechanosensitive channels and their functions in DH in Table 3.

Table 3.

Key mechanosensitive channels and their functions in distraction histogenesis.

Mechanosensitive channels Key channel Stimulus Ions involved Functions Location Discovery year References
Piezo Piezo1 Mechanical force, physical stimuli K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+ Activating downstream osteogenic pathways Osteoblasts, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, osteocytes, chondrocytes, periodontal ligament cells, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts 2010 20,98, 99, 100,121,132
TRP TRPV4, TRPM7 Mechanical stimulation Ca2+ Activating downstream osteogenic pathways Osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and chondrocytes 1997 136,139, 140, 141,143,135,155, 156, 157
ENaC / Shear force, PH Na+ Still unclear Osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and chondrocytes 1993 93,160, 161, 162,166

Note: Piezo, piezoelectric element; ENaC, epithelial sodium; TRP, transient receptor potential.

Piezo channels

Identified firstly in 2010, the Piezo channel family primarily consists of Piezo1 and Piezo2, both of which play a crucial role in mechanotransduction.20,94 In humans, Piezo1 and Piezo2 consist of 2521 and 2752 amino acids, respectively, while in mice, these channels have 2547 and 2822 amino acids.95,96 Piezo channels are highly sensitive to mechanical stimuli and are extensively distributed among mammalian cells.20,97 Upon activation by mechanical stimuli, Piezo ion channels allow the influx of various ions such as K+, Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ into the cell97, 98, 99, 100, 101 (Fig. 5). This influx occurs because the Piezo1 channel forms a pore that opens in response to mechanical forces, permitting these extracellular ions to enter the cell and thereby initiating various downstream signaling pathways.98, 99, 100 Despite sharing a similar trimeric structure, there are differences between Piezo1 and Piezo2, as revealed by cryo-electron microscopy studies on mouse Piezo1 and Piezo2.95,96,102,103 Consequently, their functions and roles also vary. In lung expansion and blood flow, Piezo1 plays a more critical role than Piezo2.103, 104, 105, 106, 107 Studies on mice with Piezo1 and Piezo2 knockouts found Piezo1 to be a key channel in responding to mechanical stimuli to enhance osteogenesis, in which mechanical forces triggered Piezo1 to enhance family with sequence similarity 20 member C (FAM20C) kinase production and dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) secretion.108 Experiments under simulated microgravity conditions further confirmed the importance of Piezo1 in maintaining osteoblastic cell function.109 Notably, patients with osteoporosis exhibit reduced Piezo1 expression, suggesting its necessity in normal osteoblastic cell functions.109 Studies have also found that activation of the Piezo1-Akt pathway plays a critical role in the mechanical stretch-induced down-regulation of sclerostin (Sost) expression, thereby reducing osteocyte apoptosis.110,111 Another study on mouse models with endothelial-specific loss of Piezo1 showed that its absence not only affected fracture repair but also inhibited the maturation process of osteoblastic cells, suggesting Piezo1 as a potential target for promoting bone regeneration and fracture healing.112 In addition, Piezo1-mediated mechanotransduction activates calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) signaling in ankylosing spondylitis patients, promoting pathological new bone formation at the attachment points.113 Recent studies further indicate that Piezo1 can promote osteogenesis by activating the CaMKII signaling pathway in response to mechanical stimulation.109,113, 114, 115, 116 These findings collectively highlight Piezo1 as a critical mechanical sensor.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

During the distraction histogenesis process, the Piezo1, TRPM7, and TRPV4 channels are activated in BMSCs and trigger downstream osteogenic pathways. Piezo, piezoelectric element; TRP, transient receptor potential; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Piezo1 is expressed in various cell types within bone tissue.117 In osteoblasts, Piezo1 plays a critical role, particularly in regulating bone formation under mechanical stimulation.118 Osteoblasts are the primary cells responsible for bone generation, and when Piezo1 senses mechanical stress, it activates downstream signaling pathways, promoting the deposition and mineralization of the bone matrix.109,119,120 Piezo1 is also expressed in BMSCs and may promote osteogenic differentiation through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.121 Studies have shown that Piezo1 promotes the differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts in response to mechanical stimulation while inhibiting adipocyte differentiation.119,122,123 Research indicates that in the context of BMSCs, under mechanical stimulation, Piezo1/2 regulates the coordinated activation of nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1), Yes-associated protein-1 (YAP1), and catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1) via protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit alpha (Ppp3ca), promoting osteoblast differentiation.124 Additionally, in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), Piezo1 further enhances osteogenesis by activating the Ras homolog family member A (RhoA) pathway in response to mechanical forces.125 Additionally, in periodontal ligament stem cells, mechanical force activates Piezo1 protein, which mediates osteogenic differentiation through the Notch signaling pathway.126 In chondrocytes, Piezo1 is involved in mechanosensing and the regulation of cellular metabolism, particularly in the growth plate region and cartilage tissue.127 It plays an important role in bone development and the mechanical properties of the skeleton.127 Piezo1 also has a crucial function in osteocytes, which are located within the bone matrix and are continuously exposed to mechanical stress. Through Piezo1, osteocytes can sense and respond to mechanical forces, thereby regulating bone remodeling. Overall, Piezo1 plays a vital role in mechanosensing across different cell types in bone tissue, helping to regulate bone formation and remodeling processes.

In the field of orthodontics, the key role of the Piezo1 channel in orthodontic tooth movement has been identified.128 Activation of this channel not only promotes new alveolar bone formation during orthodontic procedures but also plays a key role in maintaining tooth movement speed.129 Additionally, the study found that Piezo1 may be involved in the mechanotransduction of periodontal ligament cells through the MAPK signaling pathway.130,131 When periodontal ligament fibroblasts are subjected to mechanical stimulation, Piezo1 can also regulate osteoclastogenesis.132 These discoveries underscore the importance of the Piezo1 channel in mechanotransduction, particularly in periodontal ligament cells, and will provide a foundation for future orthodontic treatment methods.129

The identification of Piezo channels not only enriches our understanding of mechanotransduction mechanisms but also highlights the ubiquitous essence and multifunctionality of mechanosensitive channels in organisms.91 Although the specific role of Piezo channels in the DH process is not yet fully understood, research on Piezo channels and their relationship with DH remains a hot topic, particularly in the context of osteogenesis.133 Exploring how Piezo channels participate in and regulate the DH process presents a promising direction for future research.

TRP channels

TRP channels constitute a family of non-selective cation channels, many of which are highly permeable to calcium ions.134,135 Under mechanical force stimulation, TRP channels open, allowing calcium ions to enter the cell, thereby increasing intracellular calcium concentration and regulating cellular functions and signal transduction93,136, 137, 138 (Fig. 5). The TRP channels were first discovered in the 1990s, with the TRPV1 channel identified by Caterina et al in 1997, opening the way to discovering other TRP channels involved in sensory processes.139 Based on the sequence similarity of TRP proteins, they can be divided into seven subfamilies of channels (TRPA, TRPC, TRPML, TRPM, TRPN, TRPP, TRPV), which are tetrameric cation channels.140 The TRPV (vanilloid) subfamily includes six different subtypes, TRPV1–6, closely associated with the mechanotransduction process.141 Current research primarily focuses on TRPV1 and TRPV4, especially TRPV4, due to its extensive expression in bone, cartilage, and synovial tissues.136,141 TRPV4 channels, expressed in both osteoblastic and osteoclastic cells, can regulate bone morphology and density, and mice lacking TRPV4 exhibit resistance to bone loss under non-load-bearing conditions.142 Previous studies highlighted the expression of TRPV4 in Caenorhabditis elegans PCA-type sensory neurons, emphasizing its role as a crucial mechanosensor involved in mating behavior.143 The role of TRPV4 as a critical mechanosensitive ion channel has gained attention in recent research.144 TRPV4 is involved in mediating oscillatory fluid shear-induced mechanotransduction in MSCs, particularly localizing to the primary cilium, which is essential for mechanical sensing.145 Study shows that TRPV4 is necessary for translating mechanical forces into calcium signaling, thereby promoting early osteogenic gene expression and contributing to MSC differentiation into osteoblasts, a process vital for skeletal homeostasis and bone regeneration.146 In MSCs with defective primary cilia, the osteogenic response is significantly impaired, emphasizing the importance of this structure in mechanotransduction.145 These findings provide promising therapeutic opportunities for targeting stem cell mechanotransduction in bone and musculoskeletal regeneration. Recent studies demonstrate that mechanosensitive osteocytes adapt to mechanical stimuli by regulating sclerostin, a bone formation inhibitor. A microtubule-dependent mechanotransduction pathway links fluid shear stress to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and calcium (Ca2+) signaling, reducing sclerostin levels.147,148 Microtubule stabilization through detyrosination influences osteocyte mechanosensitivity, while nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 2 (NOX2) activation generates ROS that stimulates the TRPV4 calcium channel, leading to calcium influx and further activation of CaMKII.147,148 These insights reveal potential targets for enhancing osteocyte mechanotransduction and improving bone quality. Additionally, a study using mechanical tooth movement and a rat in vitro compression force model found that mechanical force regulated the characteristics of MSCs (periodontal ligament stem cells) during bone remodeling through TRPV4 activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway.149 Recent studies indicate that TRPV4 mutations are associated with a range of skeletal dysplasias and arthropathies.150 The absence of TRPV4 channels can lead to the development of osteoarthritis and a decline in osteocyte function.151, 152, 153, 154 These findings underscore the pivotal role of TRPV4 as a mechanosensitive ion channel in bone formation and metabolic regulation.151, 152, 153, 154

Additionally, transient receptor potential melastatin 7 (TRPM7) is increasingly recognized for its crucial role in mechanotransduction and the promotion of osteogenesis155 (Fig. 5). TRPM7 plays a critical role in MSCs' mechanotransduction by directly sensing membrane tension. Mechanical stimulation activates Ca2+ influx through TRPM7, which further triggers calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum via the inositol trisphosphate receptor type 2 (IP3R2).156 This cascade leads to the translocation of NFATc1 into the nucleus, promoting the expression of osteogenic genes and driving bone formation. This pathway underscores the central role of TRPM7 in MSC mechanical stimulation-induced osteogenesis, highlighting its importance in bone regeneration.156 In addition, TRPM7 has been shown to mediate osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stromal cells under intermittent fluid shear stress through the TRPM7-osterix axis, highlighting its importance in mechanotransduction pathways that regulate mesenchymal stromal cell fate decisions.155 Recent preliminary findings have shown that the TRPM8 channel promotes osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs.157 This study suggests a potential role for TRPM8 in mechanotransduction-mediated osteogenesis, although current research on this topic is limited, and further investigations are needed.

In summary, TRP channels like TRPV4 and TRPM7 are key in mechanotransduction, converting mechanical signals into cellular responses that promote bone regeneration through calcium signaling and osteogenic pathways. Their roles in osteocyte function and BMSC differentiation make them critical targets for DH. Future research could explore the therapeutic potential of modulating TRP channels for enhancing bone healing and treating skeletal disorders, opening new avenues for interdisciplinary applications in regenerative medicine.

ENaCs

The ENaC family represents a crucial group of sodium channels, which include not only vertebrate ENaCs and acid-sensitive channels (ASICs) but also DEGs in nematodes, pickpocket (PPK) in fruit flies, and peptide-gated sodium channels (HyNaCs) in hydra.18,158,159 Under mechanical force stimulation, ENaCs open, followed by entry of sodium ions to the cell, leading to membrane depolarization, changes in ion balance, and regulation of cellular functions and signal transduction.93,160 ENaC was discovered in the late 1980s and cloned by Canessa et al in 1994, significantly advancing the understanding of sodium balance and fluid homeostasis.161 These channels are assembled from α, β, γ, and δ, four homologous subunits, into a heterotrimeric structure, and their activity is regulated by proteolytic action and mechanical forces.162 A previous study demonstrated that ASICs responded to shear stress and acidic pH, manifesting as transient current increases, highlighting their potential as mechanical sensors.163 Other studies found ENaC activity regulated by calpain-2 proteolysis of the myristoylated alanine rich protein kinase C substrate (MARCKS) protein.164 In the regulation of bone formation, nitric oxide synthases, voltage-sensitive calcium channels, and cyclooxygenase-2 have been shown to be involved in the functioning of ENaCs.160 ENaCs may also play a role in regulating functional changes in osteoblastic cells driven by sodium under low osmotic pressure.160,165,166 In addition, in rat osteoblastic cells, 8-pCPT-cGMP through the cGMP/PKG II pathway regulates the expression of ENaCs, promoting the proliferation, differentiation, and expression of osteogenic genes in osteoblastic cells.167 Recent studies have shown that ENaCs play a significant role in diseases such as osteoporosis, skeletal muscle atrophy, and fractures.160

Overall, although ENaCs are one of the main mechanosensitive channels, there is little research on ENaCs in relation to osteogenesis or DH. Their role remains largely unknown and requires further exploration in future studies.

Translating mechanical signals into histogenesis signals

The extracellular matrix in signal transduction

The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays a pivotal role in converting mechanical signals into biochemical signals that promote bone growth, acting as a crucial physical medium between cells and their external environment.168,169 The ECM is composed of a network of proteins produced by cells, including major components like collagen, fibronectin, fibrin, and elastin, which form fibrous structures that endow it with unique mechanical properties.169, 170, 171 These assembled fibers allow cells to modify the mechanical signals they receive by converting soluble ECM proteins into insoluble fibers with distinct mechanical properties.168 Current research indicates that the ECM activates a series of intracellular signaling pathways that convert mechanical signals into internal biochemical signals, often involving cellular cytoskeletal actin, cell adhesion molecules, and extracellular signal-regulated kinases.172

Despite extensive studies on the ECM's role as a mediator of mechanical signal transduction, the mechanisms by which ECM sensitivity to mechanical signals is regulated remain unclear. Furthermore, the specific roles of different ECM components in mechanical signal transduction and how cells adjust the composition and function of ECM to adapt to various mechanical environments are to be elucidated.

Mechanical signal transduction through the cell membrane

The cell membrane acts as a crucial interface that mediates the cell's response to external and internal mechanical stimuli and the subsequent biochemical signal transduction.173 Singer et al first proposed the fluid mosaic model, emphasizing the fluid nature of the cell membrane.174 This model was further refined later on, to emphasize that it consists primarily of a mosaic of phospholipids, cholesterol, and proteins, all highly fluid.175 This fluidity allows the cell membrane to adapt to changes in mechanical conditions, maintaining cellular morphology and mechanical performance.173 Simultaneously, this fluid nature is essential for the function of mechanosensitive channels, as it allows them to respond dynamically to mechanical stimuli. Mechanosensitive channels, such as ENaC, TRP, and Piezo, located on the cell membrane, form ion-conductive pathways that respond to changes in mechanical forces.88,176 The known eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels include ENaC, TRP, and Piezo,18 which play key roles in mechanical force transduction. These cell membrane channels recognize, convert, and transmit external mechanical signals, thereby regulating various physiological processes.177 In addition to mechanosensitive channels, other components of the cell membrane, such as integrins, fibronectins, and osteocalcin receptors, also participate in the transduction of mechanical signals.168

Conduction of mechanical force signal pathways

Cells' perception of and response to mechanical forces involve the activation and regulation of multiple signaling pathways, covering many molecular mechanisms from the cell membrane to the cytoplasm, and further, to the nucleus. Many of these mechanisms have been studied and involve multiple signaling pathways and molecular routes178 (Fig. 6). We summarize the key signaling pathways in DH in Table 4.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Mechanotransduction and signalings during distraction histogenesis. The mechanical force acts on the extracellular matrix and cell membranes, subsequently affecting mechanosensitive channels (such as Piezo1, TRPM7, TRPV4). These channels, upon receiving mechanical signals, activate corresponding signaling molecules. These molecules promote cell proliferation and differentiation by activating a series of complex signaling pathways (such as Wnt/β-catenin, Smad, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and mTOR) and secrete growth factors like TGF-β1, PDGF-BB, and VEGF. Subsequently, these growth factors are transported through the peripheral blood to distant sites of injury, facilitating bone elongation or reconstruction, as well as the formation and repair of vascular and skin tissues. Piezo, piezoelectric element; TRP, transient receptor potential; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-beta 1; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor-BB; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Table 4.

Summary of key signaling pathways in distraction histogenesis.

Signaling pathway Role in distraction histogenesis Main components References
Wnt/β-catenin Promotes osteoblast differentiation, bone formation, and fracture healing. WNT ligands (WNT4, WNT10A), receptors (FZD1, FZD2, LRP5, LRP6), β-catenin, DKK1, sFRP1, sFRP2, 181,182,185,186
Smad Mediates TGF-β and BMP signaling, crucial for osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. TGF-β, BMP-2, BMP-4, Smad2/3, Smad4 200,203,204,207,208
MAPK Regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis during bone regeneration ERK, JNK, p38 213, 214, 215, 216
PI3K/AKT and mTOR Controls cell growth, survival, metabolism, and angiogenesis, vital for bone regeneration. PI3K, AKT, mTORC1, mTORC2 76,218,220,222
HIF-1 Enhances osteogenesis and angiogenesis under hypoxic conditions. HIF-1 16,224, 225, 226
CXCR4/SDF-1 Recruit mesenchymal stem cells to promote bone and tissue regeneration. CXCR4, SDF-1 227, 228, 229, 230
RhoA/ROCK-TAZ Regulating the osteogenesis process. RhoA, ROCK, TAZ 231
YAP/TAZ-Notch Regulation of H-type endothelial cells to promote osteogenesis. YAP, TAZ, Notch 232
PGE2-hypothalamic neuroendocrine Regulating bone formation, integrating mechanical stimuli, and modulating metabolic processes. PGE2, EP receptors, NPY, CREB, sympathetic nervous system 233, 234, 235

Note: MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; HIF-1, hypoxia inducible factor-1; CXCR4, chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 4; SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor 1; RhoA, Ras homolog family member A; ROCK, Rho-associated kinase; TAZ, tafazzin; YAP, Yes-associated protein; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; EP, prostaglandin E2 receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; BMP: bone morphogenetic protein; FZD, Frizzled; LRP, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein; sFRP, secreted frizzled-related protein; DKK1, Dickkopf-related protein 1; NPY, neuropeptide Y; CREB, cAMP-response element binding protein.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is one of the most critical cellular biological pathways in the osteogenic mechanotransduction process. The earliest study of the role of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in mechanotransduction was on mouse mammary tumor formation in the early 1980s.179,180 Subsequent research revealed that Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a central regulatory role in establishing and remodeling bone morphology, particularly in bone tissue's response to mechanical loads.181, 182, 183 This pathway positively influences the conversion of MSCs to osteoblasts and their maturation, directly participating in callus remodeling and bone repair.184 Studies showed that induced expression of Wnt7b promoted bone formation in aged mice and enhances fracture healing.182,185 Kasaai et al, in 2012, first revealed the activation of the Wnt pathway during the DH process in mice.186 They found that WNT ligands (WNT4 and WNT10A), receptors (FZD1, FZD2, LRP5, and LRP6), β-catenin, and its antagonists (DKK1, CTBP1, CTBP2, sFRP1, sFRP2, and sFRP4) were up-regulated during DH and down-regulated during consolidation, providing clues that WNT could be a potential therapeutic target to accelerate bone regeneration.186 Further studies showed that the chitosan/si-CKIP-1 silencing technique could activate the Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling pathway in a rat mandibular DH model, thereby promoting bone formation.187

Additionally, another study verified the role of notoginsenoside in promoting endothelial progenitor cell angiogenesis and emphasized the importance of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in resolving blood supply issues in DH, opening new research and clinical application directions in the field of bone regeneration.188 Furthermore, a previous study highlighted the significant role of the Wnt pathway in DH.189 By establishing a DH model in rats and using the Wnt pathway inhibitor recombinant rat Dickkopf-related protein 1 (rrDkk1), the authors observed an increased expression of Wnt pathway components during the DH process.189 However, the application of rrDkk1 inhibited these signaling components and limited the healing process, indicating that inhibiting the Wnt pathway should be avoided in DH treatment.189 Moreover, recent studies indicate that thrombin peptide 508 or epidermal growth factor-like domain-containing protein 6 (EGFL6) can promote bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.67,190, 191, 192 In addition, the large tumor suppressor 1 (LATS1)/YAP1 axis has also been found to control bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis through activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.193 These findings reveal novel molecular mechanisms, suggesting that specific growth factors and proteins play crucial roles in enhancing bone formation and tissue repair through modulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. This provides potential targets and new therapeutic strategies for improving the efficacy of distraction osteogenesis therapy.

Similarly, in experiments on orthodontic tooth movement, the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway was observed. Studies found that orthodontic forces can elevate the levels of Runx2 mRNA and β-catenin in osteoblastic cells.194 In a study of the DH rat model, the authors found that the gene expression of some components of the Wnt pathway changed during the DH process.195 These findings highlight the activating role of the Wnt pathway in DH and its potential as a target for accelerating bone regeneration.

Smad signaling pathway

The Smad protein family, discovered through genetic screening in invertebrates, consists of eight members, classified into three types: receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads): Smad1, 2, 3, 5, and 8; the common mediator Smad (Co-Smad): Smad4; and inhibitory Smads (I-Smads): Smad6 and Smad7.196, 197, 198, 199 The receptor-regulated Smads are closely related to osteogenesis. Smad2 and Smad3 are specific to TGF-β and activin signals, whereas Smad1, Smad5, and Smad8 respond to BMP signals.200,201 The Smad protein family acts as intermediary molecules that transmit signals from the cytoplasm to the nucleus following the binding of TGF-β to its receptor, playing a significant role in signal transduction and regulating downstream target gene transcription.202,203

BMP is a subgroup of the TGF-β superfamily that plays a crucial role in bone healing and traction-induced osteogenesis.204 Research indicates that during DH, mechanical tensile stress induces the expression of BMP-2 and BMP-4, but does not trigger the expression of BMP-6, BMP-7, or growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF-5) mRNA.205 Radomisli et al established a femoral distraction model in rats, revealing that the early stages of distraction osteogenesis under mechanical load led to the elevated expression of type I and type II collagen, BMP-2/4, and osteocalcin.206 Then, Farhadieh and colleagues established a sheep mandibular distraction model and found high expression of BMP-2, BMP-4, and Smads.207 Subsequently, Haque et al established a rabbit tibial DH model and observed high expression of BMP signaling during the DH process.208 In addition, Khanal et al, using a rat mandibular bone DH model, found that the expression of BMP-2, -4, and Smads 1, 5, 8 increased significantly during distraction and gradually decreased during consolidation, suggesting that the Smad signaling pathway might play an important role in mandibular distraction.200 In two recent studies, high expression of BMP and Smads during DH was also observed.203,204 The above studies suggest that DH may promote osteoblast proliferation and participate in traction-induced osteogenesis by regulating the expression of BMP/Smad signaling molecules.

Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway

The MAPK pathway is a critical link between the cell surface and the nucleus. It regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and death, as well as bone formation.209, 210, 211 This pathway encompasses various cellular signaling pathways, including ERK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38. Studies compared the use of the p38 activator anisomycin and p38 inhibitors in a rat mandibular bone distraction model and found that anisomycin promoted new bone formation during DH, while p38 inhibitors reduced new bone formation.212 This result indicates that anisomycin promotes the recruitment of MSCs in the distraction gap, providing a new strategy for bone regeneration. Moreover, using in vivo and in vitro distraction models, they explored how static strain affects the migration of BMSCs and the role of the p38/matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) axis in this process.213 They first demonstrated the importance of the p38/MMP-2 axis in regulating BMSC migration under static mechanical strain.213 Additionally, Tang et al found that Fibroblast growth factor 9 (Fgf9) negatively regulates osteoblast and osteoclast formation through MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways, confirming the role of the MAPK pathway in osteogenesis.214 Further, research has shown that interleukin 17F (IL-17F) or ZINC40099027 mediates osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization through the MAPK/ERK1/2 pathway, a critical step in bone regeneration, suggesting that IL-17F or ZINC40099027 may be a potential target for treating bone loss diseases.107,215 Additionally, in orthodontic treatment, periodontal tissue remodeling is closely related to the activation of the ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways and the up-regulation of bone-related genes, providing a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of periodontal tissue changes during orthodontic treatment.216 Moreover, a study involving cyclic tensile stress applied to rat calvarial osteoblasts revealed that ERK1/2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) are sequentially activated by tensile loading, both contributing to osteogenesis during this process.72 These findings underline the multifaceted role of the MAPK signaling pathway in DH, providing a theoretical basis for future use of this pathway to promote bone regeneration and treat related diseases.

PI3K/AKT and mTOR signaling pathways

In DH, the interaction between the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways has significant biological significance, as these pathways jointly regulate key processes in bone regeneration.182,217 mTOR is a special serine/threonine protein kinase belonging to the family of PI3K-related kinases, forming two different complexes: mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2).182,217 AKT is not only a component of the PI3K pathway but also closely associated with the activation of mTORC1.218 AKT can directly or indirectly activate mTORC1 by inhibiting tuberous sclerosis complex 1/2 (TSC1/2), while on the other hand, mTORC2 is also involved in the phosphorylation and activation of AKT, indicating the role of mTORC2 in the PI3K/AKT pathway.218

The mTOR signaling pathway plays a key role in cell division and the differentiation of MSCs. Animal models of DH have shown a significant increase in the expression of the mTOR gene in the new bone formation area, confirming the activation of the mTOR signaling pathway in DH.219 Wang et al demonstrated how mechanical stretching promoted the expression of osteogenic differentiation markers in MG-63 osteoblast-like cells, accompanied by increased phosphorylation of mTOR and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) p65 and their migration to the nucleus.220 This study first revealed the interaction between mTOR and NF-κB under mechanical stretching, indicating their key roles in regulating the cellular homeostasis of osteoblasts under mechanical stretch.

The PI3K/AKT pathway, involved in regulating various biological processes including cell growth, survival, metabolism, and angiogenesis, plays a central role in cellular functions through the activation of AKT.221 Angiogenesis is critical for the success of DH, where endothelial progenitor cells play a vital role. Research shows that under DH and hypoxic conditions, the angiogenic capacity of endothelial progenitor cells increases with the elevation of m6A methylation and methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) levels, while METTL3 enhances endothelial progenitor cell angiogenesis by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway, thus, promoting bone regeneration.222 Additionally, using a canine DH and bone defect model, it was found that the expression of cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34), CD133, HIF-1α, and heat shock protein 20 (Hsp20) at the mandibular distraction osteogenesis site was up-regulated, revealing a new mechanism by which Hsp20 regulates endothelial progenitor cells in a hypoxic environment through AKT activation.223 Further, canine endothelial colony-forming cell-derived exosome thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) mediated angiogenesis and osteogenesis in DH through the PI3K/AKT/ERK pathway.76 These findings highlight the importance of the PI3K/AKT pathway in promoting bone regeneration and angiogenesis during DH, providing new research directions and treatment strategies to accelerate bone regeneration. These results underline the synergistic action of mTOR and PI3K/AKT in DH. They not only individually affect bone cell growth and differentiation but also strengthen the response to mechanical and biochemical signals through their interaction. Therefore, the interaction between mTOR and PI3K/AKT in DH provides a new perspective for understanding the molecular mechanisms of bone regeneration and may guide future clinical treatment strategies, especially in promoting bone repair and regeneration.

Other signaling pathways

In addition to the main pathways discussed, other pathways, such as the HIF-1α pathway, have also shown their ability to promote bone formation in DH.16,224, 225, 226 Furthermore, the chemokine C-X-C motif receptor 4 (CXCR4)/stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) pathway also deserves attention.227,228 In a rat mandibular DH model, recruitment of exogenous MSCs was mediated through the SDF-1/CXCR4 pathway.229 Similarly, tibial transverse transport surgery facilitated the healing of diabetic foot ulcers through the activation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling pathway.230 In addition, a recent study has shown that the RhoA/Rho-associated kinase (ROCK)-tafazzin (TAZ) axis can regulate bone formation within the cranial suture osteogenesis.231 Another study indicates that tensile stress activates and exosomal transfer of the YAP/TAZ-Notch circuit designates H-type endothelial cells for segmental bone regeneration.232 These findings warrant future studies to delve deeper into the molecular mechanisms of these signaling pathways.

Recently, the signals of osteocytes responding to mechanical stress have been preliminarily revealed to be processed and interpreted in the brain. Lv et al demonstrated how mechanotransduction through skeletal interoception regulated bone and fat metabolism via the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)/prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 (EP4)-hypothalamic pathway. This shows how mechanical signals influence systemic energy balance, linking DH with metabolic control.233 Guo et al further revealed that unloading-induced skeletal interoception reduced PGE2 levels, leading to bone loss through hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) signaling.234 Their subsequent research confirmed that mechanical stress-induced PGE2 activates hypothalamic cAMP-response element binding protein (CREB), promoting bone formation and regulating sympathetic activity.235 This study underscores the critical role of mechanotransduction in DH and its implications for conditions such as osteoarthritis. These studies collectively illustrate the vital role of mechanotransduction in musculoskeletal regeneration and its broader systemic effects through neuroendocrine pathways.

Perspective

Current research on bone disease, DH, and mechanosensitive channels show how mechanical signals are transmitted through the extracellular matrix and cell membrane, activating a variety of signaling pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin, mTOR, MAPK, Smad, and PI3K/AKT. These signaling pathways play significant roles in regulating bone cell proliferation, differentiation, and matrix synthesis. However, challenges and gaps still exist. For example, research on how mechanosensitive channels is activated during DH is still scarce, and a more in-depth understanding of the roles of the downstream signaling pathways activated by mechanosensitive channels in bone growth and tissue regeneration, as well as their interactions and regulatory mechanisms, is still needed. Additionally, current research on DH primarily focuses on in vitro experiments and small animal models, with large-scale clinical studies being rare. Therefore, more clinical research is needed to verify its applications in bone and tissue regeneration.

With a deeper understanding of mechanotransduction mechanisms, we anticipate that DH will be further optimized and expanded in its applications in treating orthopedic diseases, craniofacial disorders, ischemic diseases of the lower limbs, and refractory ulcers, among other areas. Moreover, considering the potential of DH in the regeneration of blood vessels, skin, and other tissues, interdisciplinary collaboration will be key to driving innovation and applications of DH. With new research directions being explored, DH is poised to become a powerful tool in promoting tissue regeneration across various fields.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xiajie Huang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Resources, Data curation. Wenjun Hao: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Data curation. Yangzhou Mo: Validation, Software, Formal analysis. Xinyun Liang: Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xiaomei Wu: Formal analysis, Data curation. Daofu Zeng: Investigation, Data curation. Yubin Mo: Data curation. William Lu: Writing – review & editing. Di Chen: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Yan Chen: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82360429 and 82060406), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China (No. 2023GXNSFAA026474), Advanced Innovation Teams and Xinghu Scholars Program of Guangxi Medical University, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M650235), and Key R&D Project of Qingxiu District, Nanning, Guangxi, China (No. 2021003).

Conflict of interests

The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Footnotes

Peer review under the responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.

References

  • 1.Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(238):249–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ilizarov G.A. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:263–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rice J.C., Cowin S.C., Bowman J.A. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech. 1988;21(2):155–168. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carter D.R. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984;36(Suppl 1):S19–S24. doi: 10.1007/BF02406129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Troulis M.J., Padwa B., Kaban L.B. Distraction osteogenesis: past, present, and future. Facial Plast Surg. 1998;14(3):205–215. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aronson J. Cavitary osteomyelitis treated by fragmentary cortical bone transportation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;(280):153–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwartsman V., Schwartsman R. Corticotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;280:37–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamamoto H., Sawaki Y., Ohkubo H., Ueda M. Maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis using osseointegrated implants. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997;25(4):186–191. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(97)80074-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gubin A.V., Borzunov D.Y., Marchenkova L.O., Malkova T.A., Smirnova I.L. Contribution of G.A. Ilizarov to bone reconstruction: historical achievements and state of the art. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016;11(3):145–152. doi: 10.1007/s11751-016-0261-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Malkova T.A., Borzunov D.Y. International recognition of the Ilizarov bone reconstruction techniques: current practice and research (dedicated to 100th birthday of G. A. Ilizarov) World J Orthoped. 2021;12(8):515–533. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liang X., Xu L., Zhou C., Fang J., Sun D., Qin C. Innovative application of the Ilizarov technique for long nerve defect reconstruction: a detailed case report. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(9):2295–2300. doi: 10.1111/os.14208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen Y., Kuang X., Zhou J., et al. Proximal tibial cortex transverse distraction facilitating healing and limb salvage in severe and recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(4):836–851. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu G., Li S., Kuang X., et al. The emerging role of tibial cortex transverse transport in the treatment of chronic limb ischemic diseases. J Orthop Transl. 2020;25:17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nie X., Kuang X., Liu G., et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport facilitating healing in patients with recalcitrant non-diabetic leg ulcers. J Orthop Translat. 2020;27:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen Y., Ding X., Zhu Y., et al. Effect of tibial cortex transverse transport in patients with recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Orthop Translat. 2022;36:194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu J., Huang X., Su H., et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport facilitates severe diabetic foot wound healing via HIF-1α-induced angiogenesis. J Inflamm Res. 2024;17:2681–2696. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S456590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang J., Sun Y.X., Li J. The role of mechanosensor Piezo1 in bone homeostasis and mechanobiology. Dev Biol. 2023;493:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jin P., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.N. Mechanosensitive ion channels: structural features relevant to mechanotransduction mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020;43:207–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang C., Ogawa R. Mechanotransduction in bone repair and regeneration. FASEB J. 2010;24(10):3625–3632. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-157370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coste B., Mathur J., Schmidt M., et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330(6000):55–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1193270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gubin A., Borzunov D., Malkova T. Ilizarov method for bone lengthening and defect management review of contemporary literature. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2016;74(2):145–154. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu Q., Liang J., Liu Z., Guo H., Wang M., Zhang Y. Global trends and current status of distraction osteogenesis: bibliometric analysis of publications from 1980 to 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hosny G.A. Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0541-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Costantino P.D., Friedman C.D. Distraction osteogenesis. Applications for mandibular regrowth. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991;24(6):1433–1443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McCarthy J.G., Schreiber J., Karp N., Thorne C.H., Grayson B.H. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(1):1–8. discussion 9-10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paley D., Herzenberg J.E., Paremain G., Bhave A. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(10):1464–1480. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199710000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baumgart R., Betz A., Schweiberer L. A fully implantable motorized intramedullary nail for limb lengthening and bone transport. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;343:135–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chiba Y. Distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis. Noshinkeigeka. 2022;50(6):1237–1246. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schmidt B.L., Kung L., Jones C., Casap N. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60(10):1170–1175. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.34993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McCarthy J.G., Katzen J.T., Hopper R., Grayson B.H. The first decade of mandibular distraction: lessons we have learned. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(7):1704–1713. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000036260.60746.1B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ramanathan M., Kiruba G.A., Christabel A., Parameswaran A., Kapoor S., Sailer H.F. Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery: demystifying differences in concepts, techniques and outcomes. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19(4):477–489. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01414-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu Z., Xu C., Yu Y.K., Tu D.P., Peng Y., Zhang B. Twenty years development of tibial cortex transverse transport surgery in PR China. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(6):1034–1048. doi: 10.1111/os.13214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hua Q., Zhang Y., Wan C., et al. Chinese association of orthopaedic surgeons (CAOS) clinical guideline for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using tibial cortex transverse transport technique (version 2020) J Orthop Transl. 2020;25:11–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bai S., Lu X., Pan Q., et al. Cranial bone transport promotes angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and modulates meningeal lymphatic function in middle cerebral artery occlusion rats. Stroke. 2022;53(4):1373–1385. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang X., Liu J., Wu X., et al. Remote continuous microinjury-triggered cytokines facilitate severe diabetic foot ulcer healing via the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. J Inflamm Res. 2025;18:1755–1772. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S493505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Eming S.A., Martin P., Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(265) [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Long L., Ji D., Hu C., Yang L., Tang S., Wang Y. Microneedles for in situ tissue regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2023;19 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Skaggs D.L., Hale J.M., Buggay S., Kay R.M. Use of a hybrid external fixator for a severely comminuted juxta-articular fracture of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(6):439–442. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199808000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang Z., Tao H., Ye Z., Jin L., Lin N., Yang D. Bone transport for reconstruction of large bone defects after tibial tumor resection: a report of five cases. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(8):3219–3225. doi: 10.1177/0300060518774992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lovisetti G., Rohilla R., Siwach K. Circular external fixation as definitive treatment for open or comminuted femoral fractures: radiologic and functional outcomes. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(Suppl 1):S115–S122. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ilizarov G.A., Deviatov A.A. Surgical elongation of the leg. Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1971;32(8):20–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yasui N., Kojimoto H., Sasaki K., Kitada A., Shimizu H., Shimomura Y. Factors affecting callus distraction in limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(293):55–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Farr S., Mindler G., Ganger R., Girsch W. Bone lengthening in the pediatric upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(17):1490–1503. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aronson J. Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(8):1243–1258. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199708000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ghoneem H.F., Wright J.G., Cole W.G., Rang M. The Ilizarov method for correction of complex deformities. Psychological and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(10):1480–1485. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199610000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tetsworth K.D., Paley D. Accuracy of correction of complex lower-extremity deformities by the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:102–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yu J.C., Fearon J., Havlik R.J., Buchman S.R., Polley J.W. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(1):1E–20E. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000130416.86351.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Winston K.R., Ketch L.L., Dowlati D. Cranial vault expansion by distraction osteogenesis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;7(4):351–361. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.PEDS10330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tae K.C., Gong S.G., Min S.K., Oh S.W. Use of distraction osteogenesis in cleft palate patients. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(5):602–607. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0602:UODOIC>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alcan T. A miniature tooth-borne distractor for the alignment of ankylosed teeth. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(1):77–83. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0077:AMTDFT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dolanmaz D., Karaman A.I., Pampu A.A., Topkara A. Orthodontic treatment of an ankylosed maxillary central incisor through osteogenic distraction. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(2):391–395. doi: 10.2319/033009-182.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Xu J., Jia Y.C., Kang Q.L., Chai Y.M. Management of hypertrophic nonunion with failure of internal fixation by distraction osteogenesis. Injury. 2015;46(10):2030–2035. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kocaoğlu M., Eralp L., Sen C., Cakmak M., Dincyürek H., Göksan S.B. Management of stiff hypertrophic nonunions by distraction osteogenesis: a report of 16 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(8):543–548. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200309000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Krishnan A., Pamecha C., Patwa J.J. Modified Ilizarov technique for infected nonunion of the femur: the principle of distraction-compression osteogenesis. J Orthop Surg. 2006;14(3):265–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saleh M., Royston S. Management of nonunion of fractures by distraction with correction of angulation and shortening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(1):105–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kulkarni S., Kulkarni G., Shyam A.K., Kulkarni M., Kulkarni R., Kulkarni V. Management of thromboangiitis obliterans using distraction osteogenesis: a retrospective study. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(5):459–464. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.83954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Qu L., Wang A., Tang F. The therapy of transverse tibial bone transport and vessel regeneration operation on thromboangitis obliterans. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi. 2001;81(10):622–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cheng B., Fu X. The focus and target: angiogenesis in refractory wound healing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018;17(4):301–303. doi: 10.1177/1534734618813229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kathawala M.H., Ng W.L., Liu D., et al. Healing of chronic wounds: an update of recent developments and future possibilities. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25(5):429–444. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2019.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dixon D., Edmonds M. Managing diabetic foot ulcers: pharmacotherapy for wound healing. Drugs. 2021;81(1):29–56. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01415-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xie J., Liu X., Wu B., et al. Bone transport induces the release of factors with multi-tissue regenerative potential for diabetic wound healing in rats and patients. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(6) [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhu Y.L., Qu L., Ye Z.M. Tibial cortex transverse distraction for primarily lymphoedema in the lower limb: a case report. J Orthop Transl. 2020;25:25–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cui Y., Xu Q., Wang J., et al. Application of external fixator traction in the treatment of syndactyly. J Orthop Transl. 2020;25:39–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.van der Woude J.D., Nair S.C., Custers R.H., et al. Knee joint distraction compared to total knee arthroplasty for treatment of end stage osteoarthritis: simulating long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness. PLoS One. 2016;11(5) [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jansen M.P., van der Weiden G.S., Van Roermund P.M., Custers R.H., Mastbergen S.C., Lafeber F.G. Initial tissue repair predicts long-term clinical success of knee joint distraction as treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26(12):1604–1608. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yao Y., Wang G., Wang Z., Wang C., Zhang H., Liu C. Synergistic enhancement of new bone formation by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and osteoprotegerin in trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis: a pilot study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(11):e446–e455. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shen J., Sun Y., Liu X., et al. EGFL6 regulates angiogenesis and osteogenesis in distraction osteogenesis via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02487-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ru Y., Gu H., Sun L., Zhang W., Wang L. Mechanical stretch-induced ATP release from osteocytes promotes osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Discov Med. 2024;36(182):494–508. doi: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202436182.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jia Y., Zhu Y., Qiu S., Xu J., Chai Y. Exosomes secreted by endothelial progenitor cells accelerate bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis by stimulating angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1115-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fu R., Bertrand D., Wang J., et al. In vivo and in silico monitoring bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis of the mouse femur. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 2022;216 [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Choi I.H., Chung C.Y., Cho T.J., Yoo W.J. Angiogenesis and mineralization during distraction osteogenesis. J Kor Med Sci. 2002;17(4):435–447. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Xiao X., Zou S., Chen J. Cyclic tensile force modifies calvarial osteoblast function via the interplay between ERK1/2 and STAT3. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12860-023-00471-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yukata K., Shukunami C., Matsui Y., et al. Chondromodulin is necessary for cartilage callus distraction in mice. PLoS One. 2023;18(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Li G., Simpson A.H., Triffitt J.T. The role of chondrocytes in intramembranous and endochondral ossification during distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999;64(4):310–317. doi: 10.1007/s002239900625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Byun J.H., Park B.W., Kim J.R., Lee J.H. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(4):338–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liao F., Liao Z., Zhang T., et al. ECFC-derived exosomal THBS1 mediates angiogenesis and osteogenesis in distraction osteogenesis via the PI3K/AKT/ERK pathway. J Orthop Translat. 2022;37:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Qin W., Liu K., Su H., et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport promotes ischemic diabetic foot ulcer healing via enhanced angiogenesis and inflammation modulation in a novel rat model. Eur J Med Res. 2024;29(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01752-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol. 2003;200(4):500–503. doi: 10.1002/path.1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schiller J.R., Moore D.C., Ehrlich M.G. Increased lengthening rate decreases expression of fibroblast growth factor 2, platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and CD31 in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(8):961–968. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181558c37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.De Deyne P.G. Lengthening of muscle during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(403 Suppl):S171–S177. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200210001-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yang Y., Li Y., Pan Q., et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport accelerates wound healing via enhanced angiogenesis and immunomodulation. Bone Joint Res. 2022;11(4):189–199. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.114.BJR-2021-0364.R1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yang S., Wang N., Ma Y., Guo S., Guo S., Sun H. Immunomodulatory effects and mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41368-021-00156-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yu L., Zhang D., Yin Y., et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport surgery improves wound healing in patients with severe type 2 DFUs by activating a systemic immune response: a cross-sectional study. Int J Surg. 2025;111(1):257–272. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Farhadieh R.D., Nicklin S., Yu Y., Gianoutsos M.P., Walsh W.R. The role of nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in inferior alveolar nerve regeneration in distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(6):859–865. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200311000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tang Z.L., Hu J., Li J.H., Zou S.J. Effect of nerve growth factor and Schwann cells on axon regeneration of distracted inferior alveolar nerve following mandibular lengthening. Chin J Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2004;7(2):81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Byun J.H., Lee J.H., Choi Y.J., Kim J.R., Park B.W. Co-expression of nerve growth factor and p75NGFR in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(5):467–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wang X., Yu Y., Zhang R., Xu J., Kang Q. Enhanced bone regeneration by Schwann cells through coupling of osteogenesis and angiogenesis via β-catenin signaling in a preclinical model of distraction osteogenesis. Int J Med Sci. 2025;22(1):209–226. doi: 10.7150/ijms.100854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ranade S.S., Syeda R., Patapoutian A. Mechanically activated ion channels. Neuron. 2015;87(6):1162–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Martinac B., Poole K. Mechanically activated ion channels. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;97:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Poole K. The diverse physiological functions of mechanically activated ion channels in mammals. Annu Rev Physiol. 2022;84:307–329. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-060721-100935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ridone P., Vassalli M., Martinac B. Piezo1 mechanosensitive channels: what are they and why are they important. Biophys Rev. 2019;11(5):795–805. doi: 10.1007/s12551-019-00584-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Arnadóttir J., Chalfie M. Eukaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:111–137. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Perin M., Chinigò G., Genova T., Mussano F., Munaron L. The impact of plasma membrane ion channels on bone remodeling in response to mechanical stress, oxidative imbalance, and acidosis. Antioxidants. 2023;12(3):689. doi: 10.3390/antiox12030689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wu J., Lewis A.H., Grandl J. Touch, tension, and transduction - the function and regulation of piezo ion channels. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(1):57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ge J., Li W., Zhao Q., et al. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature. 2015;527(7576):64–69. doi: 10.1038/nature15247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wang L., Zhou H., Zhang M., et al. Structure and mechanogating of the mammalian tactile channel PIEZO2. Nature. 2019;573(7773):225–229. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1505-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Xiao B. Mechanisms of mechanotransduction and physiological roles of PIEZO channels. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024;25(11):886–903. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00773-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fang X.Z., Zhou T., Xu J.Q., et al. Structure, kinetic properties and biological function of mechanosensitive Piezo channels. Cell Biosci. 2021;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13578-020-00522-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Liu H., Hu J., Zheng Q., et al. Piezo1 channels as force sensors in mechanical force-related chronic inflammation. Front Immunol. 2022;13 [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Syeda R., Florendo M.N., Cox C.D., et al. Piezo1 channels are inherently mechanosensitive. Cell Rep. 2016;17(7):1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Huang L., Jiao Y., Xia H., et al. Strontium zinc silicate simultaneously alleviates osteoporosis and sarcopenia in tail-suspended rats via Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ signaling. J Orthop Translat. 2024;48:146–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tang H., Zeng R., He E., Zhang I., Ding C., Zhang A. Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (Piezo1): a promising therapeutic target and its modulators. J Med Chem. 2022;65(9):6441–6453. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Xu X., Liu S., Liu H., et al. Piezo channels: awesome mechanosensitive structures in cellular mechanotransduction and their role in bone. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(12):6429. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Murthy S.E., Dubin A.E., Patapoutian A. Piezos thrive under pressure: mechanically activated ion channels in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(12):771–783. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nunez D.S., Malik A.B., Lee Q., et al. Erratum: Piezo1 induces endothelial responses to shear stress via soluble adenylyl cyclase-IP3R2 circuit. iScience. 2023;27(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li J., Hou B., Tumova S., et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature. 2014;515(7526):279–282. doi: 10.1038/nature13701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hu W., Guo Z., Tang W., Long J. Mechanoresponsive regulation of tissue regeneration during distraction osteogenesis. FASEB J. 2024;38(18) [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Dzamukova M., Brunner T.M., Miotla-Zarebska J., et al. Mechanical forces couple bone matrix mineralization with inhibition of angiogenesis to limit adolescent bone growth. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3059. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30618-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sun W., Chi S., Li Y., et al. The mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is required for bone formation. eLife. 2019;8 [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sasaki F., Hayashi M., Mouri Y., Nakamura S., Adachi T., Nakashima T. Mechanotransduction via the Piezo1-Akt pathway underlies Sost suppression in osteocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;521(3):806–813. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.10.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhan H., Xie D., Yan Z., et al. Fluid shear stress-mediated Piezo1 alleviates osteocyte apoptosis by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2024;730 [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chen P., Zhang G., Jiang S., et al. Mechanosensitive Piezo1 in endothelial cells promotes angiogenesis to support bone fracture repair. Cell Calcium. 2021;97 [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Chen S., Li Z., Chen D., et al. Piezo1-mediated mechanotransduction promotes entheseal pathological new bone formation in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(4):533–545. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Liu Y., Tian H., Hu Y., et al. Mechanosensitive Piezo1 is crucial for periosteal stem cell-mediated fracture healing. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(10):3961–3980. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.71390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.He Z., Du Y., Peng C., et al. Piezo1 promotes osteogenesis through CaMKII signalling in a rat maxillary expansion model. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025;28(1):196–206. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Wang B., Shao W., Zhao Y., et al. Radial extracorporeal shockwave promotes osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling of bone marrow stromal cells from senile osteoporosis via activating the Piezo1/CaMKII/CREB axis. Bone. 2024;187 [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lei L., Wen Z., Cao M., et al. The emerging role of Piezo1 in the musculoskeletal system and disease. Theranostics. 2024;14(10):3963–3983. doi: 10.7150/thno.96959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Li X., Han L., Nookaew I., et al. Stimulation of Piezo1 by mechanical signals promotes bone anabolism. eLife. 2019;8 [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Du Y., Xu B., Li Q., Peng C., Yang K. The role of mechanically sensitive ion channel Piezo1 in bone remodeling. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12 [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Li X., Zhang C., Vail C.E., Sherrill J.T., Xiong J. Piezo1 expression in mature osteocytes is dispensable for the skeletal response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2025;190 [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sugimoto A., Iwata K., Kurogoushi R., et al. C-terminus of PIEZO1 governs Ca2+ influx and intracellular ERK1/2 signaling pathway in mechanotransduction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;682:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.09.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Shen B., Tasdogan A., Ubellacker J.M., et al. A mechanosensitive peri-arteriolar niche for osteogenesis and lymphopoiesis. Nature. 2021;591(7850):438–444. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03298-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Huang Z., Huang Y., Ning X., Li H., Li Q., Wu J. The functional effects of Piezo channels in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03452-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Zhou T., Gao B., Fan Y., et al. Piezo1/2 mediate mechanotransduction essential for bone formation through concerted activation of NFAT-YAP1-β-catenin. eLife. 2020;9 [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ambattu L.A., Gelmi A., Yeo L.Y. Short-duration high frequency MegaHertz-order nanomechanostimulation drives early and persistent osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. Small. 2022;18(8) [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wang L., Wang X., Ji N., Li H.M., Cai S.X. Mechanisms of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1 protein in mediating osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells via the Notch signaling pathway. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi. 2020;38(6):628–636. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhou Y., Zhang C., Zhou Z., Zhang C., Wang J. Identification of key genes and pathways associated with PIEZO1 in bone-related disease based on bioinformatics. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):5250. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Jiang Y., Guan Y., Lan Y., et al. Mechanosensitive Piezo1 in periodontal ligament cells promotes alveolar bone remodeling during orthodontic tooth movement. Front Physiol. 2021;12 [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Jin Y., Li J., Wang Y., et al. Functional role of mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 in human periodontal ligament cells. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(1):87–94. doi: 10.2319/123113-955.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Shen Y., Pan Y., Guo S., Sun L., Zhang C., Wang L. The roles of mechanosensitive ion channels and associated downstream MAPK signaling pathways in PDLC mechanotransduction. Mol Med Rep. 2020;21(5):2113–2122. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Xie B., He X., Guo Y., et al. Cyclic tensile stress promotes osteogenic differentiation via upregulation of Piezo1 in human dental follicle stem cells. Hum Cell. 2024;37(6):1649–1662. doi: 10.1007/s13577-024-01123-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Schröder A., Neher K., Krenmayr B., et al. Impact of PIEZO1-channel on inflammation and osteoclastogenesis mediated via periodontal ligament fibroblasts during mechanical loading. Eur J Oral Sci. 2023;131(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Tian C., Lyu T., Zhao X., Wang R., Wu Y., Yang D. Piezo1 channel: a global bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2024. Channels. 2024;18(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mickle A.D., Shepherd A.J., Mohapatra D.P. Sensory TRP channels: the key transducers of nociception and pain. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;131:73–118. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Okada H., Tanaka S. Plasmalemmal interface for calcium signaling in osteoclast differentiation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2022;74:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2022.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yoshida T., Miyajima Y., Wakamori M. Springer Japan; Tokyo: 2010. Mechanosensitive TRP Channels in Osteoblasts. Interface Oral Health Science 2009; pp. 205–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Erkhembaatar M., Gu D.R., Lee S.H., et al. Lysosomal Ca2+ signaling is essential for osteoclastogenesis and bone remodeling. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(2):385–396. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cox C.D., Poole K., Martinac B. Re-evaluating TRP channel mechanosensitivity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2024;49(8):693–702. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2024.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Caterina M.J., Schumacher M.A., Tominaga M., Rosen T.A., Levine J.D., Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature. 1997;389(6653):816–824. doi: 10.1038/39807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Al-Sheikh U., Kang L. Mechano-gated channels in C. elegans. J Neurogenet. 2020;34(3–4):363–368. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2020.1832091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Xu B.Y., Jin Y., Ma X.H., Wang C.Y., Guo Y., Zhou D. The potential role of mechanically sensitive ion channels in the physiology, injury, and repair of articular cartilage. J Orthop Surg. 2020;28(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Mizoguchi F., Mizuno A., Hayata T., et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 deficiency suppresses unloading-induced bone loss. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216(1):47–53. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Brugman K.I., Susoy V., Whittaker A.J., et al. PEZO-1 and TRP-4 mechanosensors are involved in mating behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1(5) [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Ji C., McCulloch C.A. TRPV4 integrates matrix mechanosensing with Ca2+ signaling to regulate extracellular matrix remodeling. FEBS J. 2021;288(20):5867–5887. doi: 10.1111/febs.15665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Corrigan M.A., Johnson G.P., Stavenschi E., Riffault M., Labour M.N., Hoey D.A. TRPV4-mediates oscillatory fluid shear mechanotransduction in mesenchymal stem cells in part via the primary Cilium. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22174-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hu K., Sun H., Gui B., Sui C. TRPV4 functions in flow shear stress induced early osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:841–848. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lyons J.S., Joca H.C., Law R.A., et al. Microtubules tune mechanotransduction through NOX2 and TRPV4 to decrease sclerostin abundance in osteocytes. Sci Signal. 2017;10(506) [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Williams K.M., Leser J.M., Gould N.R., et al. TRPV4 calcium influx controls sclerostin protein loss independent of purinergic calcium oscillations. Bone. 2020;136 [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Jin S.S., He D.Q., Wang Y., et al. Mechanical force modulates periodontal ligament stem cell characteristics during bone remodelling via TRPV4. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(10) [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Steinecker-Frohnwieser B., Lohberger B., Toegel S., et al. Activation of the mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and TRPV4 in primary human healthy and osteoarthritic chondrocytes exhibits ion channel crosstalk and modulates gene expression. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(9):7868. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Liao Z., Umar M., Huang X., et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1: a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Prolif. 2024;57(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Zeng D., Chen Y., Liao Z., et al. Cartilage organoids and osteoarthritis research: a narrative review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11 [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Wei G., Lu K., Umar M., et al. Risk of metabolic abnormalities in osteoarthritis: a new perspective to understand its pathological mechanisms. Bone Res. 2023;11(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00301-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Chen Y., Zeng D., Wei G., et al. Pyroptosis in osteoarthritis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Inflamm Res. 2024;17:791–803. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S445573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Liu Y.S., Yu-An L., Huang C.J., et al. Mechanosensitive TRPM7 mediates shear stress and modulates osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells through Osterix pathway. Sci Rep. 2015;5 [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Xiao E., Yang H.Q., Gan Y.H., et al. Brief reports: TRPM7 senses mechanical stimulation inducing osteogenesis in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell. 2015;33(2):615–621. [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Henao J.C., Grismaldo A., Barreto A., et al. TRPM8 channel promotes the osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Knoepp F., Ashley Z., Barth D., et al. Shear force sensing of epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) relies on N-glycosylated asparagines in the palm and knuckle domains of αENaC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(1):717–726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911243117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kashlan O.B., Wang X.P., Sheng S., Kleyman T.R. Epithelial Na + channels function as extracellular sensors. Compr Physiol. 2024;14(2):1–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Wang R.Y., Yang S.H., Xu W.H. Role of epithelium sodium channel in bone formation. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(5):594–600. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.176994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Canessa C.M., Schild L., Buell G., et al. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature. 1994;367(6462):463–467. doi: 10.1038/367463a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Kizer N., Guo X.L., Hruska K. Reconstitution of stretch-activated cation channels by expression of the alpha-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel cloned from osteoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(3):1013–1018. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Barth D., Fronius M. Shear force modulates the activity of acid-sensing ion channels at low pH or in the presence of non-proton ligands. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43097-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Montgomery D.S., Yu L., Ghazi Z.M., et al. ENaC activity is regulated by calpain-2 proteolysis of MARCKS proteins. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2017;313(1):C42–C53. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00244.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Lu L., Wu L., Chen J., Lin X.H., Wan C., Li Q.N. Effects of sodium on rat osteoblast and the role of epithelial sodium channel. J South Med Univ. 2011;31(11):1871–1874. [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Nam H.Y., Murali M.R., Ahmad R.E., Pingguan-Murphy B., Raghavendran H.R.B., Kamarul T. Mechanical strain-mediated tenogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells is regulated through epithelial sodium channels. Stem Cell Int. 2020;2020 [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Chen J., Zhang H., Zhang X., et al. Epithelial sodium channel enhanced osteogenesis via cGMP/PKGII/ENaC signaling in rat osteoblast. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(4):2161–2169. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3065-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Dalton C.J., Lemmon C.A. Fibronectin: molecular structure, fibrillar structure and mechanochemical signaling. Cells. 2021;10(9):2443. doi: 10.3390/cells10092443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Saraswathibhatla A., Indana D., Chaudhuri O. Cell-extracellular matrix mechanotransduction in 3D. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(7):495–516. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00583-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Weinberg S.H., Mair D.B., Lemmon C.A. Mechanotransduction dynamics at the cell-matrix interface. Biophys J. 2017;112(9):1962–1974. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Singh P., Carraher C., Schwarzbauer J.E. Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:397–419. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Romani P., Valcarcel-Jimenez L., Frezza C., Dupont S. Crosstalk between mechanotransduction and metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(1):22–38. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00306-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Martinac B., Nikolaev Y.A., Silvani G., et al. Cell membrane mechanics and mechanosensory transduction. Curr Top Membr. 2020;86:83–141. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctm.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Singer S.J., Nicolson G.L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Nicolson G.L. The fluid-mosaic model of membrane structure: still relevant to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of biological membranes after more than 40 years. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1838(6):1451–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Reddy B., Lu A., Bavi N., Hsu A., Borgnia M., Perozo E. High-resolution structures of MscS in a lipid bilayer: reinterpreting "force from lipids" activation in mechanosensitive channels. Biophys J. 2019;116(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Delmas P., Parpaite T., Coste B. PIEZO channels and newcomers in the Mammalian mechanosensitive ion channel family. Neuron. 2022;110(17):2713–2727. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Wallrath L.L., Bohnekamp J., Magin T.M. Cross talk between the cytoplasm and nucleus during development and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;37:129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Nusse R., Varmus H.E. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 1982;31(1):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90409-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Choi R.B., Robling A.G. The Wnt pathway: an important control mechanism in bone's response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2021;153 [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Williams B.O., Insogna K.L. Where Wnts went: the exploding field of Lrp5 and Lrp6 signaling in bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(2):171–178. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.081235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Joeng K.S., Lee Y.C., Lim J., et al. Osteocyte-specific WNT1 regulates osteoblast function during bone homeostasis. J Clin Investig. 2017;127(7):2678–2688. doi: 10.1172/JCI92617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Liu J., Xiao Q., Xiao J., et al. Wnt/β-catenin signalling: function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2022;7(1):3. [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Liu G., Vijayakumar S., Grumolato L., et al. Canonical Wnts function as potent regulators of osteogenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Biol. 2009;185(1):67–75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Song D., He G., Song F., et al. Inducible expression of Wnt7b promotes bone formation in aged mice and enhances fracture healing. Bone Res. 2020;8:4. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0081-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Kasaai B., Moffatt P., Al-Salmi L., Lauzier D., Lessard L., Hamdy R.C. Spatial and temporal localization of WNT signaling proteins in a mouse model of distraction osteogenesis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60(3):219–228. doi: 10.1369/0022155411432010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Zhou Z.C., Che L., Kong L., Lei D.L., Liu R., Yang X.J. CKIP-1 silencing promotes new bone formation in rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(1):e1–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Zhu P., Jiang W., He S., et al. Panax notoginseng saponins promote endothelial progenitor cell angiogenesis via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03219-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Wang X., Luo E., Bi R., Ye B., Hu J., Zou S. Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for distraction osteogenesis in rats. Connect Tissue Res. 2018;59(1):45–54. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2017.1300154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Ryaby J.T., Sheller M.R., Levine B.P., Bramlet D.G., Ladd A.L., Carney D.H. Thrombin peptide TP508 stimulates cellular events leading to angiogenesis, revascularization, and repair of dermal and musculoskeletal tissues. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 3):132–139. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Amir L.R., Li G., Schoenmaker T., Everts V., Bronckers A.L.J.J. Effect of thrombin peptide 508 (TP508) on bone healing during distraction osteogenesis in rabbit tibia. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;330(1):35–44. doi: 10.1007/s00441-007-0448-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Li K., Liu L., Zhang J., Liao C., Hu J., Song J. TP508 promotes bone regeneration on distraction osteogenesis via the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2025;26(3):402–410. doi: 10.2174/0113892010289575240306033011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Li K., Liu L., Liu H., Xing J., Hu P., Song J. LATS1/YAP1 axis controls bone regeneration on distraction osteogenesis by activating Wnt/β-catenin. Tissue Eng Part A. 2024;30(3–4):154–167. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2023.0091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Li S., Yang S., Ren A., Dai H. Investigation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway on regulation of Runx2 in cementoblasts under mechanical stress in vitro. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi. 2015;33(1):35–39. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Song J., Ye B., Liu H., et al. Fak-Mapk, Hippo and Wnt signalling pathway expression and regulation in distraction osteogenesis. Cell Prolif. 2018;51(4) [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Xu X.L., Dai K.R., Tang T.T. The role of Smads and related transcription factors in the signal transduction of bone morphogenetic protein inducing bone formation. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;17(5):359–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Feng X.H., Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:659–693. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Hellingman C.A., Davidson E.N., Koevoet W., et al. Smad signaling determines chondrogenic differentiation of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: inhibition of Smad1/5/8P prevents terminal differentiation and calcification. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(7–8):1157–1167. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Ma T.T., Meng X.M. TGF-β/Smad and renal fibrosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1165:347–364. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Khanal A., Yoshioka I., Tominaga K., Furuta N., Habu M., Fukuda J. The BMP signaling and its Smads in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Oral Dis. 2008;14(4):347–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Chen G., Deng C., Li Y.P. TGF-β and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8(2):272–288. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.2929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Luo K. Signaling cross talk between TGF-β/Smad and other signaling pathways. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2017;9(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Liu D., Zhao Z., Jiang W., et al. Panax notoginseng saponin promotes bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis via the TGF-β1 signaling pathway. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Sun W., Li M., Zhang Y., et al. Total flavonoids of rhizoma drynariae ameliorates bone formation and mineralization in BMP-Smad signaling pathway induced large tibial defect rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Sato M., Ochi T., Nakase T., et al. Mechanical tension-stress induces expression of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and BMP-4, but not BMP-6, BMP-7, and GDF-5 mRNA, during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(7):1084–1095. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Radomisli T.E., Moore D.C., Barrach H.J., Keeping H.S., Ehrlich M.G. Weight-bearing alters the expression of collagen types I and II, BMP 2/4 and osteocalcin in the early stages of distraction osteogenesis. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(6):1049–1056. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Farhadieh R.D., Gianoutsos M.P., Yu Y., Walsh W.R. The role of bone morphogenetic proteins BMP-2 and BMP-4 and their related postreceptor signaling system (Smads) in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15(5):714–718. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200409000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Haque T., Mandu-Hrit M., Rauch F., Lauzier D., Tabrizian M., Hamdy R.C. Immunohistochemical localization of bone morphogenetic protein-signaling Smads during long-bone distraction osteogenesis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54(4):407–415. doi: 10.1369/jhc.5A6738.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Raman M., Chen W., Cobb M.H. Differential regulation and properties of MAPKs. Oncogene. 2007;26(22):3100–3112. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Pearson G., Robinson F., Gibson T.B., et al. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. Endocr Rev. 2001;22(2):153–183. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.2.0428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Majidinia M., Sadeghpour A., Yousefi B. The roles of signaling pathways in bone repair and regeneration. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(4):2937–2948. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Yang Z.H., Wu B.L., Ye C., et al. Targeting P38 pathway regulates bony formation via MSC recruitment during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rats. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13(10):783–789. doi: 10.7150/ijms.16663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Yang Z., Wu B., Jia S., et al. The mechanically activated p38/MMP-2 signaling pathway promotes bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell migration in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;76:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Tang L., Wu M., Lu S., et al. Fgf9 negatively regulates bone mass by inhibiting osteogenesis and promoting osteoclastogenesis via MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(4):779–791. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Zhang N., Cui M., Liu X., et al. IL-17F promotes osteoblastic osteogenesis via the MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(4):1052. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Jiang L., Tang Z. Expression and regulation of the ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in periodontal tissue remodeling of orthodontic tooth movement. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(1):1499–1506. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Laplante M., Sabatini D.M. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149(2):274–293. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Wang S., Wang J., Wang S., et al. mTOR signaling pathway in bone diseases associated with hyperglycemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(11):9198. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Nakai N., Kawano F., Oke Y., et al. Mechanical stretch activates signaling events for protein translation initiation and elongation in C2C12 myoblasts. Mol Cells. 2010;30(6):513–518. doi: 10.1007/s10059-010-0147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Wang D., Cai J., Zeng Z., et al. The interactions between mTOR and NF-κB: a novel mechanism mediating mechanical stretch-stimulated osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(6):4592–4603. [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Liu X., He H., Zhang F., et al. m6A methylated EphA2 and VEGFA through IGF2BP2/3 regulation promotes vasculogenic mimicry in colorectal cancer via PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(5):483. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04950-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Jiang W., Zhu P., Huang F., et al. The RNA methyltransferase METTL3 promotes endothelial progenitor cell angiogenesis in mandibular distraction osteogenesis via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Han Z., He X., Feng Y., Jiang W., Zhou N., Huang X. Hsp20 promotes endothelial progenitor cell angiogenesis via activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway under hypoxia. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2022;19(6):1251–1266. doi: 10.1007/s13770-022-00481-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Wan C., Shao J., Gilbert S.R., et al. Role of HIF-1alpha in skeletal development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1192:322–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05238.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Wan C., Gilbert S.R., Wang Y., et al. Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha pathway accelerates bone regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(2):686–691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708474105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Özdel A., Sarısözen B., Yalçınkaya U., Demirağ B. The effect of HIF stabilizer on distraction osteogenesis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turcica. 2015;49(1):80–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Hosogane N., Huang Z., Rawlins B.A., et al. Stromal derived factor-1 regulates bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced osteogenic differentiation of primary mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42(7):1132–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Xu J., Chen Y., Liu Y., et al. Effect of SDF-1/Cxcr4 signaling antagonist AMD3100 on bone mineralization in distraction osteogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;100(6):641–652. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0249-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Cao J., Wang L., Du Z.J., et al. Recruitment of exogenous mesenchymal stem cells in mandibular distraction osteogenesis by the stromal cell-derived factor-1/chemokine receptor-4 pathway in rats. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):937–941. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Ou S., Wu X., Yang Y., et al. Tibial cortex transverse transport potentiates diabetic wound healing via activation of SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling. PeerJ. 2023;11 [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Ye J., Wang J., Zhao J., et al. RhoA/ROCK-TAZ Axis regulates bone formation within calvarial trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis. Cell Signal. 2024;121 [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Wang F., Li S., Kong L., et al. Tensile stress-activated and exosome-transferred YAP/TAZ-Notch circuit specifies type H endothelial cell for segmental bone regeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2024;11(12) [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Lv X., Gao F., Li T.P., et al. Skeleton interoception regulates bone and fat metabolism through hypothalamic neuroendocrine NPY. eLife. 2021;10 [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Guo Q., Chen N., Patel K., Wan M., Zheng J., Cao X. Unloading-induced skeletal interoception alters hypothalamic signaling to promote bone loss and fat metabolism. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;10(35) [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Gao F., Hu Q., Chen W., et al. Brain regulates weight bearing bone through PGE2 skeletal interoception: implication of ankle osteoarthritis and pain. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41413-024-00316-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genes & Diseases are provided here courtesy of Chongqing Medical University

RESOURCES